Ciarán Hinds received his first Oscar nomination for portraying "Pop" in Belfast.
Belfast is Kenneth Branagh's semi-autobiographical film about his time as a young boy in Belfast during the time of "the troubles" between protestants and Catholics. An imperfect, but wholly affable, film that works best when it is lower key in its largely sentimental and nostalgic approach.
The always reliable character actor Ciarán Hinds takes on the essential role of so many coming of age stories, that of the loving grandfather. This actually is a pretty big departure for the type of roles Hinds is known best for, those being the often cold or at least stoic authority figure. Hinds though makes you instantly forget all that, and steps right into the role of the loving grandfather as though he's been playing this role his whole career. Hinds really is fantastic in crafting this role, that is technically very mannered, but you really wouldn't know it unless you know Hinds from elsewhere. Hinds alters his accent as well as his overall voice to be reflective of this elder man of Belfast from an older time. This delivering the Belfast accent while also accentuating a greater age within his deeper more labored voice. His physical manner is much the same as exudes the age of the character. He moves around with this natural difficulty. He moves around as a man who needs to be mindful of his steps and careful of his movements. He simply is this grandfatherly type who has that age of his life as simply a part of him and Hinds's performances grants that gradualness as a part of who Pop is. What is again impressive about this is that if you've never seen Hinds before you just simply accept it, but honestly what's even more impressive is that if you have he instantly makes you forget that you've seen him before. At the very least you wonder if Hinds simply aged a great deal since you've seen him last, as he's so comfortable in this role.
Hinds comes in and out of the film most frequently providing some kind of council to his grandson Buddy, typically as Buddy struggles to get close to a girl in his class he has a crush on. Hinds has such a wonderful sincerity in the role, despite again technically being a mannered performance, but you don't think of any of that as he inhabits this loving natural state of Pop. Hinds's delivery is filled with warmth and a loving mischievousness as he attempts to offer Buddy a few pointers. Hinds has this wonderful tone as he brings this sort of eagerness to match the energy of the boy, and a playfulness in his eyes. Hinds shows that as much as the old man is in a way playing on the boy's field of thought, he's also loving to do so and so overjoyed to be able to give him a bit of his perspective. Hinds brings the right sort of fun in this as Pop teachers Buddy the valuable lesson of cheating slightly in math via bad handwriting or just suggesting he try to see his crush outside of school. In each instance Hinds has this wonderful way of showing the way Pop is processing Buddy's problems with this keen thoughtfulness of a man truly thinking for his grandson whom he loves. Hinds is in so many ways the representative of the major virtue of the film, which is when the sentiment completely works. Again so often it is when it is low key. This as Pop serenading Granny (Judi Dench) with "How to Handle a Woman" from Camelot, I think could have gone wrong, but Hinds's delivery of it is filled with such striking earnestness.
There is no pushing for the lovely moment, he just simply makes it by singing the song with such an easy grace and honest love. Every one of his scenes is a little bit of a gem, largely just through how good Hinds is here in making all the material here work. The highlight of such being when Buddy comes to visit Pop while he's in the hospital. Hinds is amazing in this scene and shows not only the virtues of his performance but the virtues that do exist within his film. Hinds, for a lack of a better word, is lovely in this scene. Again the warmth he brings and the sweetness of his performance is here. This in the earned humor of commenting on a old story about robbing the rent man which Hinds delivers with this spirited remembrance so filled with personal nostalgia and again that playfulness as he's actively entertaining the boy with the tale. There is a greater depth though in Hinds's work, this as in the scene Buddy is speaking about the family moving from Belfast, where Pop obviously will not be coming too. Hinds so naturally brings just in these momentary glances a quiet sense of the concern and unease that Pop is feeling for himself to lose that family, that the man actively hides within him to try to do what will be best for his children and grandchildren. This subtle distress makes his encouraging words towards his grandson all the more powerful. Hinds's delivery though is filled with warmth as he advises the boy against fear and reminding him that he has so much no matter where he is. Hinds delivers the speech just so simply and in that way so powerfully by showing a man foregoing any of his own loss, but just trying to wholly comfort his grandson. Hinds finds just that right tone where of course there's sentiment there, the right sentiment as he so honestly portrays this sense of familial love. This is true for every second of Hinds's work here that represents the film's greatest virtues through the honest ease in which he realizes this loving old man from Belfast.
49 comments:
Definitely my favorite of Belfast’s nominations. Hits the right sweetspot of sentimentality without falling into cloying.
Loved him here. Wish he hadn't been so underutilized in his career.
I'd go as far to say that he gave my 2nd favourite performance in Deathly Hallows Part 2 after Rickman.
Just watched Pig and I really loved it. Expertly directed and incredibly well-acted. Goes through a lot of themes of grief and revenge, but always stays engaging. The story hit close to home for me and really moved me. Also, maybe my personal favorite Cage performance to date? Certainly one of my favorite performances of the year. Going to be thinking about this one a lot.
9.4/10
Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/pig-2021/
Cast ratings:
Nicolas Cage - 5/5
Louis: You should check out Rome eventually, he's terrific as Julius Caesar.
Louis: And rating and thoughts on Dornan.
Another film I have yet to see but am meaning to. I've always found Hinds to be an interesting screen presence, and this seems to be situation where a reliable character actor is given his proper due.
Something I'll also note is that when I read Hinds was playing a grandfather, I looked up his age and was actually surprised at how old he is (he turned 69 yesterday!). He's one of those guys that's just kind of...stayed the same throughout his career, so good on him really.
He's lovely and it's nice to see Academy Award nominee Ciaran Hinds.
I know I've been pretty anti-Belfast on here but I can't really fault any of the performances, Dornan and Balfe in particular grew on me on rewatch.
I will say though. and I understand why there isn't because of the child's perspective, but I think I'd have liked one or two more scenes between him and Dornan, because what little we got I did really, really like between them.
Also, since I've been trying not to spoil the film for myself, I also didn't know until now it was a semi-autobiography of Branagh's childhood.
Incidently, I also didn't know Branagh was Irish until today, so for those here of UK birth, forgive my ignorance.
There were 9 first time acting nominees this year which is pretty good.
I did some calculations on how many first time acting nominees there were since 1936, the most amount of first time nominees is 15, in both 1940 and 1995.
Mitchell: Technically, Belfast is in the UK.
Last year was 12 and this year was 9, so it's definitely a sign in the right direction.
Then again they did have Dench getting her eighth nom while Negga couldn't become only the fourth black actress to get repeat noms so I'm not giving them too much credit on that front (yes, I know it was Buckley who was probably in that fifth spot but she was great and also a first-timer so she deserved the spot).
Luke: I know, but I thought he was England this whole time.
Louis: which film do you think was harmed most by a bad campaign/release strategy this year? I've been discussing with people and we've pretty much come to the conclusion that it's Cyrano, was never going to be a BP player or anything but if they'd stuck with the release date originally I think Dinklage, and a few other technicals (after all it got into one where its presence felt odd anyway, costume design) wouldn't have been out of reach.
Whatever everyone thinks of the film, fair play to Branagh for becoming the only person in Oscars history to have been nominated in 7 separate categories throughout his career.
It's an impressive achievement, no doubt about that, and I'll take a Branagh in director over McKay any day.
Luke:
Dornan - 4(Dornan gives the best performance that I've seen from him as the dad here. This as I think he finds the right balance between this sort of idolized stoic demeanor that a kid often views their dad as, with these alternate moments of a bit of cheekiness, or the moments with Balfe. They are terrific together, well not as potent or distant, similar to Yeun and Han in Minari in creating the sense of the love that got them married is somewhat obscured by their frustrations and difficulties with just life in general. They find the right natural quality together in this sense, and balance it well by the moments of more ease like her side eye at dad's film going choice or Dornan's serenade of her, which is the highlight of Dornan's performance as the man who originally charmed her to be his wife.)
Calvin:
Cyrano without a doubt. Quite honestly the choice to release it so late is just baffling, there was no way to build buzz for it. Belle I think also released WAY too late to properly make the impact it should've.
Calvin: Not to mention, his directorial debut and first oscar nod came from the one of the most praised Shakespeare adaptations of all time - all when hadn't even turned 30!
Belle's release strategy was terrible. Though that's about on par the course with a lot of anime releases Stateside. They really need to sort that issue out.
Mitchell: It's certainly impressive and I always forget how young he was when he pulled that off.
Also with Belfast, anyone else think Balfe could've been the casualty of vote splitting between Lead/Supporting? Because while I know Dench is an Academy favourite it's still weird that Balfe couldn't make it in with her buzz. Have a feeling what helped Stanfield get in last year might have conversely affected Balfe from getting in this year (which is a shame because she is in the right category).
And as promised:
Brazinterma:
Poster:
1. Licorice Pizza (Drawn)
2. Annette
3. Spencer (Dress)
4. Last Night in Soho (Double)
5. Nightmare Alley (Stanton)
6. The Tragedy of Macbeth
7. Shiva Baby
8. Red Rocket
9. Passing
10. Parallel Mothers
Luke:
Makeup & Hair-styling Nominees:
Army of the Dead
Candyman
Dune
The Green Knight
The Suicide Squad
Calvin:
That's certainly possible.
In regards to Caitriona Balfe splitting, I've never been fully sure on this but I assumed that you could only be placed in one category, would Balfe have been on the voting ballot/longlist for both Actress and Supporting Actress?
My thinking is, if they thought Balfe was leadish, I thought that would help her if anything, one thing that helped Daniel Bruhl for Rush get so nearly there despite the film having no buzz at all, was because he was basically a lead placed in Supporting, and ye same Lakeith.
RatedRStar: Oscar voters can decide the category for themselves. It's how Winslet got in for Lead for The Reader when the studio was pushing her supporting. A lot of people think it's how Stanfield got nominated too (voters who voted for Kaluuya in Lead, voted for Stanfield in Supporting, letting them both get in).
Marcus: Yes that makes sense.
Louis: Your 1970s cast & director for The Harder They Fall.
Louis: Your thoughts on these Hitchcock and Welles interviews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xh9IlXHHCIk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NTOSevzp4w
Bryan:
The Harder They Fall 1970's directed by Gordon Parks:
Nat Love: Richard Roundtree
Rufus Black: Brock Peters
Stagecoach Mary: Margaret Avery
Trudy Smith: Earth Kitt
Bass Reeves: Woody Strode
Jim Beckwourth: Glynn Turman
Cuffee: Diahann Carroll
Cherokee Bill: Yaphet Kotto
8000's:
Don't quite have the time right at this instance.
what do you think about Brian Cox as Aberforth Dumbledore in DH Part 2.
I mean, i love Ciaran Hinds, even in mediocre stuff like Spirit of Vengeance, and i always like seeing him, and i am as happy as anyone else to see him get nominated, but ... why him? Cox was right there!?
Tim: What the hell
Tim: Are we thinking of the same Brian Cox? Because nothing about what you said makes sense.
I didn't expect for Hinds to be this high, but I agree with everyone at calling him the best performance out of the Belfast cast. He certainly had his moments.
Louis: Rating and thoughts on Dench.
John Smith: Louis, thougts on the 'Everlasting Love' scene and the scene in the theater from 'Belfast'
JimmyStewart: https://actoroscar.blogspot.com/2021/11/alternate-best-supporting-actor-2000_9.html
Just watched The 12th Man in history class. This is a Norwegian film that tells the true story of Jan Baalsrud, a member of a Norwegian sabotage group under world war 2. During one mission, he was the only one who survived and was chased by the nazis through Norway. It's a very fascinating story that is told quite well here, even though it is quite noticably historically incorrect. It is a very flawed film, but one I found to be quite engaging.
6.3/10
Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/the-12th-man/
Cast ratings:
Thomas Gullestad - 3.5/5
Jonathan Rhys Meyers - 3.5/5
Robert and Matt:
I Porbably had some weird wordchoice yesterday. Granted, i was fucking plastered last night.
What i wanted to say: i like Ciaran Hinds a lot. I like seeing him in everything. I like seeing him nominated. (Saying that was definitely the most out of place thing which i think led to confusion)
And i also like that he is in Harry potter, but it is odd that he played the role and not Cox. So i meant, what WOULD you think about Cox as Aberforth.
Don't drink and write.
Louis: your 20 best Peter Sellers and Malcolm McDowell moments?
Louis: Had King Richard been snubbed for Best Picture, do you think Cumberbatch would be the favourite to win? It is interesting to note that those two are the only lead acting nominees who got their films into Best Picture.
I actually think Cumberbatch could still win.
Same. Smith's good, but I'm just not buying the 'overdue' narrative for him. From a 2010s reference point, one could argue Cumberbatch is more overdue in a way.
I honestly think Cumberbatch is in a pretty good position to win, he’ll be winning BAFTA, SAG honestly isn’t out of the realm of possibility, plus his film is like incredibly strong. Also Smith is (surprisingly) not really campaigning at all.
I think we ought to wait 'till the Critic's Choice to get a more concise view of what will happen. The way I see it, Smith is understandably the favorite after the Globe win alongside his film making the BP line-up.
However, if anyone truly feels like they have any chance to beat him, it's Garfield imo. While Cumberbatch feels more like the critic-favored choice that doesn't quite gain momentum (like Riz Ahmed last year or Adam Driver the year before that), Garfield I think has the narrative of "acclaimed actor getting a consolidating turn" that leads him to win the big one.
I really don’t see where Garfield has any narrative to win currently unless he wins SAG, with how tick tick boom has been performing.
It's weird, as much as I didn't jive with tick, tick... BOOM, his work has sat pretty well with me.
John Smith:
Everlasting Love is just a wonderful scene. It's where the cinematography is the best, and it just succeeds in being such a joyful moment, particularly in creating the real sense of the love between the parents who have had a contentious relationship during the rest of the film.
Which one?
Ytrewq:
Feel like I might've given those.
Marcus:
I think Cumberbatch could easily win, as sometime the critical favorite does win (Affleck, who had a whole lot more baggage than Cumberbatch). Even if he loses SAG, the BAFTA feels very likely for him, so it ought to come down to the wire, unless Smith becomes the default choice. But yes, I think I'd have little reservation of picking Cumberbatch if Richard had been snubbed in picture. Right now they're on equal footing and will be, again unless Cumberbatch loses BAFTA.
Emi Grant:
Critics choice is meaningless. The Globe isn't far off, and ought to be meaningless this year with the boycott.
Garfield being snubbed by BAFTA (or at least not making it into the top 2), and Tick Tick...Boom largely under-performing makes me think he lost his momentum. I think he still has an outside chance, but just that.
Robert: Same honestly. Granted I don’t think any of the film’s faults stem from the acting.
Post a Comment