Showing posts with label 1994 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1994 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 November 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Results

10. Robert De Niro in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein - De Niro is the best part of his terrible film, attempting to find some humanity in the concert of ridiculousness.
 
Best Scene: Listening to the family. 
9. Woody Harrelson in Natural Born Killers - Harrelson gives a convincing portrayal of a brutal madness, even if the character is rather limited. 

Best Scene: Interview.
8. Shah Rukh Khan in Kabhi Ha Kabhi Na - Delivers a nice charming turn as a somewhat atypical romantic hero given where the romance goes.

Best Scene: Accepting the situation.
7. Brandon Lee in The Crow - Lee tragically proves himself a capable leading man both delivering the intensity and charisma needed for the part. 

Best Scene: Before the kidnapping.
6. Kevin Bacon in The River Wild - Bacon gives a fine menacing turn bringing the right degree of sleaze with just enough charisma in there.

Best Scene: "There's no way"
5. Ge You in To Live - Although overshadowed to a definite degree, Ge You still gives a moving portrayal of man just making his way through trauma.

Best Scene: The hospital.
4. Tom Cruise in Interview With The Vampire - Cruise is surprisingly able to disappear into his role as his vampire who loves being a vampire.

Best Scene: Ending.
3. Temuera Morrison in Once Were Warriors - Morrison gives a terrific portrayal of both the brute and the charmer that allows a vicious cycle of abuse to exist.

Best Scene: Winning his wife over.
2. Xia Yu in In The Heat of the Sun - Xia gives a wonderful coming of age turn that amplifies every moment of his young man's journey into life and love.

Best Scene: "Party"
1. Ben Kingsley in Death and the Maiden - Good predictions Lucas, Tim RatedRStar, Anonymous, Matt & Jack. Kingsley delivers one of his best performances in both creating such a compelling question then delivering an unforgettable answer.
 
Best Scene: Confession.

Next: 1994 Supporting

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Jim Carrey in Dumb and Dumber

Jim Carrey did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Lloyd Christmas in Dumb and Dumber. 

Dumb and Dumber, I find to be quite the hilarious, dumb movie, about two dimwitted friends who go on a cross country trip to return a suitcase to a beautiful woman, that is in fact a ransom. 

Well after despising Natural Born Killers, which I found to be all of Oliver Stone's worst tendencies wrapped within one aggressively unappealing package. Its obviously intended to be off-putting, however I felt it was what it seemed to be deriding, while also seeming to attempt to pretend to have some unearned pretension. I thought what was particularly notable about that film is how so many of the techniques that worked so well in JFK fail horribly there, although many reasons why, but I won't get into that here. Although Woody Harrelson is actually more than decent in his role, I don't feel like devoting a review to that film. Instead I'm going to enjoy myself by discussing Jim Carrey's final film in his breakout banner year. That which opened with his breakthrough with Ace Ventura, then his somewhat more traditional, though still heavily comic turn as any man Stanley Ipkiss, given strange abilities, in The Mask, and finally topped with his work here, that makes itself clear. This after all Carrey is the dumber in the title, and with that I really just need to stop all pretenses and just state my delight for this performance. Now notable is this as I've reviewed Carrey three other times, but none for a pure comedy, even Man on the Moon, is far more interested in its biographical recreations than really the comedy. Carrey of course achieving his stardom through comedy, and with Dumb and Dumber, it is easy to state why. This as we get the greatest purity of this form here in Dumb and Dumber, that to describe as silly might be an understatement, but that's the key of the film, that is largely here just to be hilarious. 

I mean this is pretty obvious from the outset as Carrey appears his least movie starish looking with his simpleton's haircut and his authentic chipped tooth. Carrey's not even an off-beat leading man here, he's a complete goofball just from this image. From the opening scene, where Carrey's Lloyd Christmas pretends to be a limo passengers, when in fact the driver, pretty much sets the tone for his performance, which is really to derive a bit of comedy out of anything. And I mean anything, this from the more obvious in the scene with his over the top reaction to hearing an accent from the woman he's speaking to, to his horrendous accent that isn't even the right one. But also just the way he floats his head down as he closes the limo's window and way of moving back into the front scene, Carrey brings this deft kind of foolishness, as every thing feels right to the simpleton that is Lloyd, while also being hilarious in its awkwardness. I think though there is something about comic performances, particularly leading ones, that requires a little more, and it kind of goes to why am I reviewing this performance and not Ace Ventura. While part is material, another for me is variety. Take Carrey's first scene of picking up the beautiful woman Mary Smasonite (Lauren Holly) to take her to the airport. Carrey is still comic gold in his reaction to see her, however it is difference. He's still goofy in his reaction to her, but rather than energetic awkwardness, it is overly earnest puppy dog adoration that is so funny here instead. His interactions with her throughout the ride are different from his initial scene, and also great, in playing every "romantic" moment so grandly, hilariously and stupidly. 

Carrey's performance in a way, is the balance between being ridiculous, but doing so in an honest way. Now by that nonsense, I mean Carrey is playing the part in that ridiculous fashion, however everything within the logic of his character and what he exudes in the role is true, to Lloyd anyways. Take as he grabs Mary's briefcase to rescue it, but fails to get to her plane, his call to the airport security "don't worry I'm a limo driver" is absolutely sincere, which makes it so funny. Now I think an essential part of this dynamic is in his co-star Jeff Daniels, as the slightly less dumb (I mean he can read), Harry. This as Daniels, who up to this point, definitely was not considered a comic actor best known for his more dramatic turns. Now Daniels obviously doesn't give a dramatic turn here but those sort of instincts though do inform his work in a way, particularly in the way he interacts with Carrey. This as Daniels is this kind of facilitator to Carrey antics, now quite a straight man, that's really all the bystanders, but a balancing factor. This as Daniels doesn't really downplay Harry but he doesn't try to upstage Carrey in turn providing the right sort of anchor. The anchor being that the as much as their interactions are comic in nature, there is a believable sense of their petulant friendship, that is innate in their work. Now having said, they are also just funny together in this dynamic of Daniels in playing bass basically to Carrey's tenor. Whether that is literally (well kinda) when singing their less than stellar rendition of "Mockingbird" to motorist in need, in fact criminal (Mike Starr), or just his expression of grand enjoyment as Carrey unleashes his personalized rendition of the most "annoying sound in the world". 

Now I could just describe a how bunch of individual moments that I love in Carrey's performance here, and I will. You have his maniacal madness when successfully poisoning his friend or imagining murdering Mary's eventual husband, that is mad gold. You have his other fantasy, which really is accentuated by Carrey goodness, with a great particular affection for his own sound effect of "aah" when rising up to face an opponent after seemingly defeated. In fact so many moments that are fantastic in Carrey's work here are the little ones, like his overly intrusive way of looking behind Mary to see he can spot Harry, or his improv exuberance when Lloyd randomly discovers the moon landing, decades later for the first time. Again though there is something about the sincerity of the stupidity, that reaps the laughs. A main instance in this being the scene of Lloyd finally getting to declare his love for Mary without reservation speaking from the heart, right in Carrey's performance, asking if he has a chance. When receiving the news that he does, one in a million, Carrey's reaction sheer hilarity by just how sincere the pure joy he brings to delivering "so you're saying there's a chance". Up until this point though I have avoided what I feel is in a strange way the most important scene in the movie, despite being the only scene that comes close to being serious, and in a way predicted Carrey's later forays there. Although there are many problems in the film's atrocious sequel, one of the central ones is the complete lack of heart, something given by this scene. The scene being when Lloyd and Harry decide to go to Aspen to search for Mary. Carrey is straight forward great in bringing so much genuine emotion, without a hint of irony, as he quietly speaks Lloyd need to no longer eek by and be a nobody and have nobody. Carrey brings the heart in this scene established the needed real motivation in the character behind all the hi-jinks. It's an actually moving moment thanks to Carrey's earnest performance, and it is exactly what the film needs to provide just the right degree humanity. Now having said that, beyond that this is just a hilarious performance that, to me, is the very best example of Carrey going full force with his comedic powers. 

Sunday, 15 November 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Xia Yu in In The Heat of the Sun

Xia Yu did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning the Volpi Cup, for portraying Ma "Monkey" Xiaojun in In The Heat of the Sun. 

In The Heat of the Sun is an absolutely wonderful, and criminally under seen, coming of age (hidden gem to be sure), directorial debut film, by Jiang Wen. 

The film is said to be semi-autobiographical by actor turned director Jiang Wen, and that can easily be seen in the absolutely brilliant casting of Xia Yu, who bares more than a passing resemblance to Jiang Wen, who narrates the film as "himself". Xia's performance goes far beyond just deft casting however, as Xia is as confident onscreen in his debut as Jiang is in his directorial debut. This as we can sort of move right past the typical pitfalls of the young performer. One doesn't need to worry about any of that. Xia's absolutely just is the part here, as he is so incredibly natural onscreen you don't give it a second thought. Rather he seems instead this perfect representation of the boy that was Jiang Wen. Now because Xia is so confident we can also kind of move past the second potential accusation of my own feelings that this is only a director's film. Not at all. Now Jiang's vision is absolutely remarkable here, Xia is in no way overshadowed by that or the narration of some of the character's feelings. He lives on his own. This from the opening scenes of the film where we meet the seemingly almost orphan like Monkey as he passes his time breaking into homes to hang out and explore, while not actually stealing anything. 

Here's where you see an excellent performance that works within the vision, these being this absolutely fantastic scenes of nostalgic memory. Xia is not merely in them however but is essential in creating the tangible feeling in them. That is Xia expresses the youthful delight as he looks upon every little thing in the home, or the joy as he uses a "borrowed" spy glass to look upon the actions of a disliked school master. Xia's work grants the sense of discovery and the right sense of mischievousness. His portrayal doing more than just representing it, but truly evoking the emotion. Creating within the scene the needed empathy with Monkey, that you too feel the excitement of the game. This can be said of Xia's whole performance that is so very honest and lived in. This as again he simply is Monkey, and each experience we see him go through is all the more tangible through that. When he is hanging out with his friends, who play different games, or even get into little street fights, Xia is never just in a scene. His performance grants the sort of dogged determination one moment to bring "justice" to bullies or another in the rapturous joy of some random truce. His work not being overshadowed, by rather properly accentuating each scene so beautifully as he elevates his work far beyond that of a surrogate. 

What is so notable about his work beyond this though is how much Xia fleshes out who Monkey is. This particularly in representing this sort of cross roads time in the boy, soon to man's, life. Xia has this particularly exceptional way his face can be so many things all at once. This as we have those moments of hanging out with friends or sneaking around someone else's house where there is that mischievousness of youth. All the same though we have also the moments of quiet brokenness of youth that are equally palatable, where Xia almost looks like a different boy. This as we initially understand more of his home life just through an absolutely brilliant monologue by Xia where he speaks as his own father figure. Xia's delivery with the false sort of "older man" kid's voice, but also a real sense of heartbreak in his eyes as each word becomes more brutal in its discipline. This as the more we see of his real relationship with his parents the more dire it appears. In these moments Xia is so moving in just expressing in his reactions that of any boy being mistreated and also ignored by his parents. His eyes shattered in a quiet sort of sadness, and more than anything we see the sense of the escape in his mischievous fantasies away from that world. Xia showing very much the boy that defines Monkey, even as so much of his actions attempt to show a maturation.

Now the final portion of the film focuses closely on his relationship with one of the individuals whose house he broke into. This being a young woman Mi Lan (Ning Ling). This presented purposefully as kind of a broken set of memories as really this strained relationship that is one of nostalgic perfection and that of broken hearted memories. We start with the former in their early scenes together where Xia projects more so the boy in the innocent interactions. This with such playful warmth that he brings, that quietly at times projects a certain maturity as the two seem to speak regarding anything of substance. Xia is exceptional in the way he doesn't play the relationship a single way, rather finding the sense of the boyish crush and the complexity within that as it clashes with an attempt at something more. We see this as he brings her into his gang of all boys. Xia's initially fantastic in being so sweet in delivering the invitation with this quiet excitement as though he's got something great for show and tell. This though changing as she does show up and instantly all the boys are obviously quite interested. The sense of the personal connection being tested Xia excels in showing the sort of hidden frustration within Monkey's attempts at posturing in front of her. This as his "show off" moments Xia presents with a certain jealous desperation to keep her interested in only him, even as she strays. Xia's work gradually building this frustration where he also expresses more petulance in the boy almost interfering with the attempt at manhood. This culminating in two scenes. The first being a heartbreaking one where Xia unleashes such a pent up bitterness as he verbally attacks Mi Lan in a thoughtless exercise of jealousy. What I love is that Xia keeps it very much as the failure of Monkey to mature in the moment. This culminating further as he attempts to force himself upon her, and Xia showing a greater regression to that of a crying infant having lost any sense of personal growth. Now a masterstroke I feel is in Jiang's writing and direction that makes both scenes likely are falsehoods of frustrated memories, however Xia is essential in realizing this failure of the past as a broken boy in reflection. Xia work finding this balance in the joys of remembering a nostalgic youth, and also the pain of replaying the failures of the past that can never be rectified.

Wednesday, 11 November 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Temuera Morrison in Once Were Warriors

Temuera Morrison did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Jake "the Muss" Heke in Once Were Warriors. 
 
Once Were Warriors is a powerful, though brutal, viewing experience that focuses on a dysfunctional family of Maoris in New Zealand. 

I'll admit I went into this film without any knowledge of it whatsoever. This as we see the opening of the family living different lives including Temuera Morrison who at first seems just like potentially, the slightly rough, but charismatic dad who is just hanging around with his mates. Morrison brings a larger than life power within his presence here. He's just the life of the given room as he matches really this personality intensity as we see his hard drinking Jake living up his life, though early warning signs begin as he seems to have little interest in the rest of his family, including his oldest son whose joining a gang, his younger son who is sent to juvenile hall or his daughter who seems to live life in a slight depression per her surroundings. Morrison though portrays Jake seemingly still having the time of his life and Morrison projects that joy remarkably in making you believe that might be the case for him. This though is harshly set aside when his wife Beth (Rena Owen), questions verbally many of his recent decisions, such as getting fired. When immediately happens is startling to understate as Morrison instantly unleashes a feral intensity. A feral intensity without caution or concern as he brutally beats and later rapes his wife. Morrison presents it without hesitation rather almost a purely animal reaction built within such a palatable sense of bitterness in his eyes as he commits his heinous crime. 

Morrison effectively bluntly shows the hard edge as we see essentially the hangover as he delivers each word even afterwards with a disregard both for his previous actions and towards any actual concerns for his family. Morrison's portrayal is hard to watch but convincing in showing just a festering anger that defines the man who is either looking for a good time or for someone to blame. Where some films I think  struggle in depicting truly toxic relationships, is within the idea of how the relationship existed to begin with. Well in this instance it shows again so well how relationship exists between Beth and Jake because of the performances of the actors. Morrison is great in a few scenes later where Jake seeks to reconcile. He portrays a real charm and quiet warmth in the moment. There is a sense of how he won her over to begin with with the calm earnest sweetness Morrison brings in the moment of showing his love for Beth, even if far more so a manipulation. Morrison though is wholly convincing in realizing the reconciliation. He doesn't suddenly make Jake a good man, rather he realizes the attractive qualities of the man, and how they would once again put a veil over Beth's eyes to his true nature of a person. Seemingly though Jake's better side is prevailing for the moment as he agrees to take Beth and the family to see their son in juvenile hall. 

Morrison again shows the appeal of Jake as even as he sings along with the car there is a real endearing cheer to Morrison's' work. He almost wins the viewer over to his seeming reformation like he is in some way a better person. There's a great moment where with the family where Jake and Beth recall their relationship. Morrison speaks the initial words of pride in taking a "prized" woman from her proud heritage of Maori warriors. As he continues to reflect on the idea, including his heritage of slave Maoris, Morrison eyes create such a palatable sense of bitterness. There again is that hatred even in him still even as he is not just yelling. Morrison revealing the considerable chip on the man's shoulder we witnessed quite loudly beforehand but now nearly silently. Morrison in this reveals the nature of the man, a man he portrays almost essentially driven by ego. This as he's not finding joy to think about all his failures in life through drinking and the like, which Jake ends up choosing to do rather than seeing his son, he rages against them. This though specifically as how it all revolves the man and only him. Morrison expresses joy only when nothing interferes with himself, but when it does, it is with a strict dissatisfaction. Morrison so well realizing the machismo of the man, that while won over Beth in the past, now rules the man's behaviors towards reacting with violence first and never thinking about it later. This as even as we see tragedy come to the family, largely due to Jake's selfishness, Morrison's reactions is essential. This as he manages to convey a degree of grief, but it is almost hollow. This as Morrison expresses as much with just still a general rage of something getting in the way of living life as his broken pride dictates. Morrison's great in this in managing to find humanity within the character, but a venomous humanity. This as we consistently find the man defined by his cruel actions and his senseless actions built around his fragile ego. Morrison gives a striking turn here by finding depth within the role of Jake without even for a moment limiting the character's terrible nature.

Saturday, 7 November 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Kevin Bacon & David Strathairn in The River Wild

 Kevin Bacon did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe, for portraying Wade nor did David Strathairn for portraying Tom in The River Wild.

The River Wild is a dated though more than decent thriller about a family going on a rafting trip who unfortunately come randomly in contact with some thieves making an escape on the same river. 



So return back to the reliable Kevin Bacon. Bacon is an interesting case in that I'm not sure I'd call him fully underrated, but one could easily make the case for him to be deserving of being an Oscar nominee, though probably a one time Oscar nominee would suffice. Speaking of one time Oscar nominees, we have David Strathairn here as well, an actor of kind of similar caliber even despite that previous aforementioned fact. Here we have them playing dueling leading roles, though Bacon was campaigned in supporting for this film, as the man who initially shows up at the start of the trip. The man who seems to be such a friendly stranger that you know he's gotta be up to no good. Bacon though is pretty good in bringing on the charisma here however. He finds the right ease about it that even within the obvious setup, Bacon delivers on the setup in making his Wade genuinely charming before he's going to really reveal himself. Now Strathairn on the other hand plays the overworking husband to Meryl Streep's rafting expert Gail, and father to Joseph Mazzello's Roarke. Strathairn being rather ideal as the "boring guy" in the early scene, having that sort of pressured manner that is just ideal of a man whose thoughts seem to be caught on elsewhere as the film opens, and he initially claims to be unable to make the trip. Strathairn's just one of the actor's whose presence is just ideal, and frankly you expect he could be some footnote in the film to be forgotten form much of the proceedings. This just as you believe Strathairn strictly as the "forgettable" guy, though he's not a forgettable performer. 

Bacon is good at playing up the charm adding a bit of southern twang similar to his JFK work though downplaying slightly here to ease into some sort of generalized idea of the potential other man as Gail has second thoughts about her marriage due to her husband's focus on work. Strathairn on the other hand is wonderfully goofy and seemingly out of his depth as he initial shows up last minute to the trip. As the early scenes go on we get the minor flirtation well played by Bacon with a sense of manipulation in the approach. Strathairn takes a convincing approach in portraying the combination of Tom's frustrations with his wife's interactions with Wade, and even his son getting too comfortable with the other man. As the scenes go on though Strathairn naturally realizes the more charming sides to charm. What I like about Strathairn's work is that without the obsession of either work or jealousy, he shows that Tom isn't an entirely different man however there is just a gradual warmth that reveals itself within the frame of the pretty straight laced guy. Strathairn brings the right earnest quality to this making the moments of reconciliation with Streep genuinely a strong scene. This as they realize a strong chemistry, after purposefully having a more strained one, both creating the right sense of intimacy in their interaction and just the right degree of playfulness in the moment. Strathairn's performance working as really kind of quietly revealing the greater depths of what we initially take his Tom as, one thing, but he is more. 

Immediately after the reconciliation we hit the overt thriller element as Wade and his partner Terry (John C. Reilly), reveal themselves as thieves and Wade being a gun touting killer. I'd say in these scenes Bacon borders on going over the top several times, I'd say though he basically hold back, though some of his specific readings maybe go out of bounds just slightly. Still Bacon brings a natural intensity and viciousness that works well for the role creating the right sense of menace in his work. Strathairn I suppose is a bit of a balance to Bacon as he stays in a strict reality where Bacon's work is definitely that of a 90's thriller, both in a good way and a more dated way. Strathairn though is terrific in bringing an honesty to the thriller element by showing both a real fear but also sense of persistence within his character. His silent reactions add up to a great deal in bringing the intensity of the scenes, just as much, if not more so, than Bacon's performance. This as any given scene of threat Strathairn makes it real. This in showing that while Tom is more than meets the eye he also isn't some superhuman.This in the most overt thriller scenes he shows the very real fear of the threat of death in every expression. Now the film, while doesn't become bad, gets a little repetitive in its third act as we keep getting Wade flopping around as Gail tries to trip him up on the river, meanwhile Tom trails behind trying to surprise Wade downriver. This doesn't give either too much to work with, but I'll give particular credit to Strathairn in doing his best to make these scenes compelling by consistently granting them as the actions of a normal man even as he goes to these great lengths. These as every moment of climbing a cliff or taking a leap, his work brings a strict sense of both the conviction of the character in his eyes, while also making the sense of danger still within at the same time. Bacon's work becomes less memorable during this time, though he makes up for it in his final scene. This as he takes upon the best sort of quiet repentant tone as he tries to trick Gail. Bacon's delivery being wonderful insincere while being sincere, before quickly reverting back to his true vicious nature for the final moment. In the end both Bacon and Strathairn, the reliable actors that they are, give fine performances here with Bacon properly realizing the expected trappings of the genre, while Strathairn doing his best to try to elevate it. 

Monday, 2 November 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Ge You in To Live

Ge You did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning Cannes, for portraying Xu Fugui in To Live.

To Live is a powerful film that follows a couple through years of upheaval in China during the 20th century. 

The films of Zhang Yimou, well his non Wuxia films, seem to seek to grant a real humanity to stories that could potentially be examine in a detached sort of reverence. This is appropriate than that this film is called simply to live, as that is what we see these people do in the husband Xu Fugui and his wife Jiazhen (Gong Li). The film reminded me a bit of Farewell My Concubine, also starring Gong Li, from the previous year and a bit of Masaki Kobayashi's masterful The Human Condition Trilogy. The notable difference with the former are those people were isolated slightly in the world of Chinese opera, and from the later in the protagonist who attempted to make a difference within a oppression regime, the protagonist here is less active. We in fact open up with Ge portraying Xu as basically a bit of a fool. This where he is spending all his money and losing it quite quickly in one bet after another. Ge's performance has a nice bit of foolish endearing quality in it. This as there is this dumb type of optimism as he tries to make every bet with eyes that suggest a man who genuinely thinks he will suddenly win any time now. Of course in fact he loses all his money and even his wife with his non stop betting, and Ge's reaction is less horror and more bafflement from a man who takes quite awhile to fully comprehend much of anything. 

Eventually he wins back Jiazhen's good graces finding himself a father. Ge's performance finds though the same foolishness though creates the same sense of purity really in his warmth with Jiazhen. It is a simple given that he loves his wife and the chemistry between them is sweet even as Gong suggests her sense intelligence that is accepting of her husband's foolish behavior. Now as the film proceeds we do see the two of them go through history, and what Ge's performance really emphasizes is the simplicity in which Xu goes through all this complex history. We find this as he has to go off to sort of fight in the war, though Xu mainly moves around artillery and reacts to the deaths of other. Ge's performance though is moving in portraying the simple reactions of Xu to these deaths. He's distraught however just with general sadness rather than any sort of change in his sort of spirit as a person. We see him as he continues to react with the sense of just a very average man, who takes in no great sense of the greater sense of the world, he's just part of it. Although with that one can run into a little bit of Louis's reviews bingo, and I would qualify To Live as a director's film. This as the depiction of Xu is largely offering this specific perspective not of the actor but the reactor of what is occurring around him. A small part of a larger tapestry who goes along with the world around him. 

We see this as he sort of side steps both the communist revolution and the cultural revolution. In both Ge is good in bringing a sincerity of a man just trying to go along by getting along. He makes his meager living, occasionally through shadow puppets, as a loving father and husband and just really that. Even in the moments of speaking to the party lines demanded by the communist party is with just  a carefree quality of obeying what society currently expects from him. Unfortunately this twice leads to tragic consequences. This first as his son dies in a tragic accident when he is sent to do dangerous work as required by the party. Ge is quite moving in showing the sheer devastation of the reaction. Although I'll say in this instance, and later instances Gong's reactions tend to be more dynamic of the more dynamic person. Whereas Ge as Xu shows the reactions still of the simple man, who even when reacting to the man who caused the death of his son, Ge's portrayal takes in this idea but even shows Xu reacting as basically as he can to it to still maintain some internal peace within himself. Tragedy strikes again, again caused by communist policies that leave children in charge of childbirth, and again we see the dueling reactions to the death of their other child. Ge is moving, but Gong keeps the stronger more potent reaction. Ge though again is truthful towards the role as he shows this wonderfully simple guilt about accidentally feeding an actual experienced doctor, brutalized by the cultural revolution, too much. Ge showing still the nature of the man just to take the personal route of least resistance even in expressing guilt. It isn't as a man who avoids it, rather he just experiences it almost with a childlike clarity. This is a good performance by Ge You, but I will admit other elements of the film left a greater impression on me.

Saturday, 31 October 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Tom Cruise in Interview With The Vampire

Tom Cruise did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Lestat de Lioncourt in Interview With the Vampire. 

Interview With the Vampire, which tells the story of the life of a southern plantation owner as a reluctant vampire having been turned by a far more eager vampire.

Much casting controversy ensued in the casting of star Tom Cruise in the role of Lestat from source material writer Anne Rice. Cruise, though still had some forays away from it beforehand, largely was working within crafting and maintaining his still ongoing star persona. This persona that in no way has anything in common with the fancy vampire who loves being a vampire in Lestat, seeming more befitting a more off-beat actor perhaps just on the surface. The thing is though despite Tom Cruise being a great star, he has shown the ability of an actor throughout his career. I think perhaps Rice should've been more concerned by Brad Pitt in a more standard leading part as Louie, the more reluctant vampire, where he seems a bit lost at times particularly in the early scenes of the film, more so than I feel is the intention for his character, whereas Cruise seems right at home. Now as usual though Cruise's portrayal actually isn't entirely alien to his star persona as one would assume, though this is probably one of the bigger stretches of his range. This as Cruise does do an accent here, smartly he doesn't overplay his hand fashioning a slight English accent, perhaps better described just a historically refined accent that honestly simply works for the part. It does more than that though in that you can easily accept him within the role with that touch. This furthered by his physical manner here that takes a distinctly classical patrician manner, that again Cruise is believable in crafting and importantly consistently realizing his Lestat as a classic vampire villain, of sorts. 

Now where there is an overlap between Cruise as his persona and in the role. This is that Cruise typically delivers a particularly type of intense personality. Intensity though specifically related to a personal drive that almost comes through in every Cruise performance, this one included. The difference here though instead of trying to win a race, hustle pool or be the top gun, he wants suck blood, a lot of blood. Cruise's particular intensity serves the character as his eyes just have that certain manner of a man, well a vampire, who lusts for the undead life of the vampire. Cruise's sort of energy he brings is ideal in crafting this idea of the man who just loves the state of being as such. His initial intention in trying to get the moody Louie to be part of this life with him. Cruise makes this a particular sort of villainy as he brings that star presence but instead wields it here as part of the power of the persona through that willingness just to go head first, into a feast. Cruise's performance really is quite essential, as the film takes quite awhile to find a plot, more of just having random acts of vampirism for awhile. Cruise though is what makes these engaging as throws himself into every scene, and honestly, in a rare instance of it, I kind of forget its really Cruise in this part despite technically having those remarkable traits of his presence present. 

The film finds its direction once Louis randomly bites a juvenile plague victim and Lestat blithely turns the victim into a vampire, Claudia (Kirsten Dunst). This where we have the two vampires becoming parents of sorts to the little girl slowly becoming a woman stuck in a little girl's body. Cruise is fantastic in actually managing to find the right balance in these scenes between a flamboyant humor and actually selling the general concept of it. This in portraying Lestat's genuine fascination with the new vampire, as he did with Louie, and the sincere, though devious, joy that Cruise portrays in every fiendish smile of his. This though with a certain cheekiness that is overtly comical when scolding Claudia for randomly killing people, and Cruise again plays it nicely with that balance he finds. Eventually though Claudia turns on Lestat attempting to kill him leaving a more feral vampire in the wake. Cruise once more does not lose the state of the character showing sort of those edges of viciousness in his manner as it comes full front. This switching to sort of the overt monster which Cruise pulls off with a genuine ease. Cruise then disappears for much of the film, with only an enjoyably creepy Stephen Rea to pick up the slack, before appearing in the denouement. These are two scenes honestly at odds against each other one a more repentant Lestat recognizing his past mistakes and the other a flamboyant return to evil. As much as there is the hypocrisy Cruise is effective again in showing an even more dreadful state in presenting Lestat with none of his pomp or circumstance to hide behind. Cruise finding just the right hint of a depth there, carefully not showing a fully regretful side of Lestat but at least a slightly understanding one of how he got to his dismal state. This against his final scene where Cruise is magnificent again in just throwing himself into the sheer bliss again at Lestat embracing his life again. Despite being at odds with his previous scene, it works because of Cruise's performance again that honestly owns both the role but also the needed tone for the material. He shows that quite frankly Lestat enjoys himself too much to really ever better his ways. Again I think it is almost easy to forget that really none of this should work on paper, and in a way one can understands Rice's concern. Tom Cruise as a flamboyant vaguely European vampire does sound positively ridiculous, but Cruise not only pulls it off, it does it to the point you just accept the character and forget this is Tom Cruise, which is something quite special in itself.

Friday, 30 October 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Shah Rukh Khan in Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa

Shah Rukh Khan did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Sunil in Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa.
 
Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa is a decent enough rom com musical about a day dreamer musician and naturally the woman he wants to woo.

Shah Rukh Khan plays the ne're-do-well "hero" who dreams of marrying the woman he loves Anna (Suchitra Krishnamoorthi) though really without much of an honest plan. Khan here has the requisite qualities for such a role as the loafer romantic. This being a charm and eagerness that ensures likability while it would be quite easy to dislike his character without those qualities. Khan brings the needed goofy sort of energy though to his portrayal. This throwing himself head first into the musical numbers with a lot needed cheer and just in general finding the right sort affable qualities of the character. This even in presenting the character's dreaming with the right sort of sloppy optimism. There's a distinct lack of thought in Khan's reactions that are kind of needed in portraying the man who really doesn't have any real plan to achieve his goals, but rather thinks he can just sort of dance his way into her heart. Khan's natural charisma carries us past really the more despicable elements about this, and properly sets us up for buying into his foolhardy endeavor. 

His endeavor that is indeed that. A method most questionable as so many a romantic "hero" goes about engaging in deception to win his love, here in sabotaging Anna's own suitor. Although unlike many he actually gets called out for his nonsense. Khan's good though in showing really the honest spirit behind the actions in presenting the pretty straight sense of love in his eyes in the moment though while also not hiding the emotionally shallow manner in which he decries her suitor and lies as boldface as possible. In the latter though he ease nicely by playing it with frankly enough, well stupidity, to present the right kind of naivety in the deception. This as Khan makes it the actions less of a master manipulator and far more so a sloppy fool with a bad plan. This as though Sunil is rejected for this approach and kicked out of his band, as Anna and the other suitor was a fellow member of it.. Only being able to rejoin through the old fashion musical rescue during a  disastrous performance, however still leaves him as the unloved one. Khan's genuinely moving though in the moments of reflect on his state of sadness just showing the blunt heartbreak of it all, fitting for an overt romantic such as Sunil. Although I do think this film suffers from the flaws of many of this ilk, that being it is overlong, but Khan's work is consistently winning in portraying the transference from the petulant romantic to a more mature one as the story goes on. This as not following traditional expectations Sunil isn't meant for his intended love after all. Khan is effective in showing the maturity even within still keeping that energetic charm. This as his reactions convey more so an understanding of really all those around him rather than that singular focus upon his sole goal. Khan's work finds the gradual increase in really the nuance in the character while importantly losing none of his charm. This in emphasizing really that sense of real introspection and empathy that ends up being rather moving. This as he manages to express the action of someone blindly in love, then later truly in love. In earlier aspect Khan being a properly endearing fool, then later a heartbroken, but honest man. 

Sunday, 25 October 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Brandon Lee in The Crow

Brandon Lee did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Eric Draven aka the titular character in The Crow. 

The Crow, for being a superhero film pre-coup de Superhero, is a decently effective, if dated and a little rough around the edges, atmospheric film about a man coming back from the dead to seek revenge against his, and his fiancee's killers. 

The career of Brandon Lee, the son of the legendary Bruce Lee, can sadly only be mentioned with the same note of tragedy same as his father. Although perhaps even greater given that it continued to the next generation and whereas Bruce was able to shine brightly, albeit so briefly, it was in this film that likely could've been his breakout sadly led to his death. His death resulting from a freak on-set accident that depicted his character's onscreen death. Lee though had completed much of the film before this enabling the film to be finished with some changes. This enabling one to see the lost potential within Lee's performance. There are a few flashback scenes with Lee pre-Crow as Eric Draven as just an average guy with girlfriend, and Lee brings a nicely lightly charming qualities to these moments. Lee playing them without overt style just rather as straight forward in showing the normal life that was broke. He takes a generally likable that rightfully distinguishes these moments from the majority of his scenes as the vicious spirit of vengeance version of Eric Draven, the white face painted, black leather sporting The Crow. 

A performance that I would say genuinely surprised me in parts for the different sides Lee brings within the role that is more than just an iconic look. This though we get his opening revival which is sort of a classic creation of a monster moment, though a bit more based around emotional anguish. Although I would say this really is a warm up as Lee's anguish is believable enough it doesn't really quite hit you in the moment with the visceral need you might want, this might be in part because you barely even know the character at this point given we really get a sense of the guy after he's already dead. Lee's performance, fittingly I suppose, comes to life once he becomes the Crow. This as Lee doesn't play the part as a hero, but in many ways how a villain might be portrayed in a more mainstream comic book film. Lee though is magnetic in the moments of the true spirit of vengeance. This as he brings the real intensity needed in his eyes more so a monster than a man. He delivers a viciousness about and offers the sort of sense of the need for vengeance that fuels him. What takes his performance further though is the real grunge style he offers. This as Lee, for the lack of a better word, is cool here in portraying the moments of Draven menacing the bad guys who killed him. There's a joy in his slick smiles, but really a rocker type style just in his movements and manner that gives the character a unique sort of life. 
 
He's not one note of dread, he is that, but there is that much needed style that Lee thrives with. As the film goes on, in kind of a Robocop sort of way, we do get more glimpses into the humanity of Draven even beyond the flashbacks. These mostly being found in his relationship with a good cop Sgt. Albrecht (Ernie Hudson), and a near orphan Sarah, who knew Draven and his girlfriend before their deaths. Lee handles these scenes well as he switches from his cutting voice of a demon, to that of a man when he interacts with both of them particularly Sarah. The switch Lee uses well as Draven basically becoming his old self in these moments represented by his voice but his whole manner. Although the scenes are relatively simple, there are genuinely affecting moments as Lee recaptures a sense of warmth in these very quiet scenes that he plays well by playing them so sincerely as the good man beneath it all. Although his arc is very rushed, there is a certain vulnerability that Lee delivers in the final climactic battle to help distinguish the final act of vengeance from the rest. This in no longer playing him really as the demon killing the men who killed him, but rather the man delivering justice. This in his final fight with the final boss (Michael Wincott), Lee in a way merges the two sides to still find a certain menace in his presence but with a greater humanity in the actions. Although I wouldn't say this is a great performance, this is a good one. Lee realizes the tricky role effectively, with that sense of style, but also just enough depth to back it up. The performance suggests a leading man in the making, and it's a true shame we never got to see it realized.

Saturday, 24 October 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Ben Kingsley in Death and the Maiden

Ben Kingsley did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Dr. Roberto Miranda in Death and the Maiden. 

Death and the Maiden follows a woman kidnapping a man she believes had raped her while she was the captive of a brutal regime. While I do think the film on the whole is effective, it suffers from an uncharacteristically bad performance from Sigourney Weaver as the woman and a mostly bland performance by Stuart Wilson as the woman's husband, also an attorney for the new ministry of justice. 

Well this film only has really three characters, with two of them being not particularly well performed, it leaves Ben Kingsley to pick up the slack. Ben Kingsley initially appears as a man who just gives the husband a ride back to the couples secluded seaside home. As seemingly meaningless as this scene is, Kingsley's performance does begin within this first scene, this when he hears the name of the man that indicates the husband will be one of the men prosecuting the criminals of the previous regime. Kingsley's expression at hearing the news glints a change in the man's thoughts. On initial viewing this may seem rather meaningless, however re-watching with the knowledge Kingsley's performance is one saying the truth of the man, just as it is hidden. This is as his expression changes to a man thinking on the matter before leaving. The man eventually turning, claiming to bring back a left behind wheel to the man, but also supposedly to state his agreement with the attorney's job to find justice for the previous regime. Kingsley's delivery being slightly a little much, purposefully, as a man putting a bit of air of support. This almost too formal in certain respect of the man showing an earnest respect. Again the degree of formality though that Kingsley places on it is perhaps just a man putting it on too thickly, or maybe is a man purposefully trying to hide who he is by agreeing with something that would easily lead to his eventual downfall. Now importantly though when not strictly speaking of politics, Kingsley's performance delivers a more naturalistic bent within the man just casually speaking to the man regarding car breakage or offering some strange counsel to the attorney about his obviously rather emotional wife. These moments importantly suggesting that the doctor may in fact just be some any man with no great secret to hide.

The turn happens though as the wife first steals the doctor's car in order to supposedly find some kind of evidence as she feels she has recognized his voice as the man who tortured and raped her. This leading her to immediately bound and gag him as she prepares to find a kind of revenge for herself, though without actually knowing whether he is in fact the man or not, having only heard him in her time of torture. Where Weaver is bizarrely terrible in her immediate sort of interrogation, hard to call it that as the doctor is initially gagged, Kingsley on the other hand is terrific by playing the scene entirely close to the bone in his reactions. This in presenting a man just absolutely terrified by the place he's in in his reactions, and in many ways having exactly no idea how to react to what is going on beyond him. Kingsley doing so much with his eyes in the moment of the man exhibiting the right sense of confusion within the moment, just as he conveys a sense of the man attempting to figure out what this inquiry is. Even in his eyes though Kingsley conveys an essential nuance as again there is a sense that the confusion could be of a man just sincerely confused at what is going on however there is also the potential for a man perhaps calculating whether he has in fact been caught in his crime. Kingsley grants the right visceral intensity to the moment, though a bit lost by just how hammy Weaver is, however Kingsley strictly finds a reality of the situation. When immediately released from his gag, Kingsley's great through his delivery of capturing the immediate trauma and terror fitting to a man having been tortured and threatened. 
 
Kingsley's performance then becomes basically the central tension of the film, again maybe this would be less the focus if his co-stars were a bit better, but nonetheless Kingsley is prepared for this. Kingsley's excellent in his scene where the attorney begins to sorta believe and interrogates the man himself. Kingsley is able to effectively tip toeing around the truth within his performance. This as he creates the right anger within his doctor that again can be that of a man who is trying to hector those interrogating him away from the truth, or that of a man righteously ticked off over the accusation. Kingsley importantly though even within these moments convey switching his eyes still that palatable sense of fear and desperation of the situation. Again though Kingsley's portrayal of the fear could be that of an innocent for his life or a guilty man for his life. Kingsley is incisive in his portrayal as again there is that duality of his work. This as he could be that of a master manipulator prodding in the insecurities of his captors or that incisiveness of who is in fact an innocent victim pleading for his life best he can. Kingsley's work is compelling in both on initial viewing crafting the question of the man's innocence or guilt, and on repeat viewing seeing the man playing the sides of the situation. When we see first a false confession, pushed by the husband to avoid a killing and the wife for satisfaction, Kingsley is great at being phony. Kingsley giving a stilted delivery of the man going through the motion of a confession in the most matter of fact way. The confession of an innocent man.

As strong as I do think Kingsley's performance is in balancing the sense of potential guilt or not while also making up for his less than compelling co-stars, what makes this a great performance to me is in his final speaking scene. This as the two literally push the doctor to the brink by threatening to kill him by pushing him into the sea. A specific one shot monologue solely on Kingsley. Kingsley is amazing in this scene as it isn't simply just a confession of what occurred by a man confessing the entirety of himself in the moment. This is as he opens with speaking towards a claimed innocence of losing himself to the temptation of the situation. A sadness but also some strange attempted pride as he speaks as a man trying to explain himself. As it continues though this twists itself towards some pride in his deeds instead as he reveals a chilling quality as he speaks of the man. Kingsley speaking with a vile rage at his own pathetic state in dealing with women in reality, and creating in his expression a since of power within the man as he speaks. A violent hatred suddenly, and even a casual quality in speaking of his "experiments" in the situation. The longer Kingsley speaks the more the man reveals himself enjoying the corruption of the state seemingly at the pinnacle of his evil. The ending of the speech is Kingsley at his most brilliant as he creates a juxtaposition. This as he is both unashamed and shameless at the same time. This as when noting "I was sorry it ended" there is a sorrow that Kingsley portrays not of his actions exactly but rather a man who thought himself as a good having fallen so far. The hesitation in his voice hinting at the humanity destroyed while his words showing a man who willingly allowed it to happen. Kingsley is outstanding in the speech as he is indeed chilling, but more so he reveals the entirety of the man's experience of the past in this single speech.

Wednesday, 21 October 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Robert De Niro in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Robert De Niro did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Frankenstein's monster in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. 

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein I imagine was propositioned as a spiritual successor to Bram Stoker's Dracula, given the title, the faithfulness of certain aspects of the adaptation (including the strange seemingly extraneous bits) and the fact that it was produced by Francis Ford Coppola, who originally intended to direct. The difference is though the aforementioned film is some operatic kitsch that is brilliant somehow...this film is not. 

Anyway naturally much of the film follows not De Niro as the monster, but director/star Kenneth Branagh in the leading role as Dr. Frankenstein hell bent on reversing death. De Niro shows up first as a man with pox who becomes violent before being quickly executed. I will spay just watching this scene it is easy to forget the time in which De Niro was a typically a devoted actor, as that certainly is the case here. For one thing he is not phoning it in. This is the fact that De Niro doesn't instantly stand out in his first scene is notable, as his accent isn't unconvincing, and it is easy to believe him as this simplistic thug if just for a few moments of screentime. I must grant that it is more than decent work from De Niro who in this scene seems to desire some kind of reality unlike his director. His director who again I think suffers from attempting to realize that tone Coppola found for Dracula, unsurprisingly, again I'm not entirely sure how Coppola even managed to make that tone work. De Niro appears again when the doctor succeeds in creating the monster a more ragged creature than the unforgettable Karloff rendition. In this aspect though I will commend the attempt and say it is not entirely a failure. De Niro's first appearance one could say is underplayed, though with conviction, in portraying just the scared almost senseless creature as he immediately runs from the mob.  De Niro moving just as a ill-formed human and a terrified one only defending itself within its escape. 

Honestly I'd say De Niro's greatest hindrance is his makeup always has a certain artificial quality to it, yes he's supposed to be made up however it looks like literally that he is makeup. I think this limits really accepting him as the monster in say the way one instantly did for Karloff in the role. It's shame as I do think there is an innate poignancy as we follow the creature learning to be more human, such as befriending a blind man and learning how to speak from a family. An actor of De Niro's note frankly could be very silly, but De Niro actually stay devoted to the concept. This in speaking with a muted tone of a man trying to break free some bound to speak again. This in portraying simple but earnest emotions of fear and happiness at the bit of tenderness he finds. His conversation with the blind man is actually quite remarkably performed by De Niro in the purposefully stilted delivery of the creature still learning, but his eyes filled with a simple hope for some joy. Equally earnest is his break down at being as quickly banished form the circumstances by those who can see him. Sadly, unaided by Branagh's over the top way of shooting it, his cry of "Frankenstein, revenge" becomes more silly than anything, although again the way he's framed in the shot is mostly what makes it that way. 

The creature becomes more so the villain in the second half as the film becomes more so a mess. De Niro's performance is actually interesting though as we see the more developed creature confront Frankenstein directly. This as De Niro speaks with a quiet menace and a degree of contemplation. There even as he threatens there's a sadness within his work that reflects the strange state of the creature. Although Branagh seems largely interested in bombast, again perhaps mistakenly going for that Dracula tone again, whereas De Niro seems to seek something closer to a more intimate idea of crafting a man out of many and just leaving him to his own devices without guidance. Sadly that is all thrown out it in favor of a series of progressively sillier scenes of the monster killing Frankenstein's loved ones while the doctor kind of just runs about. It doesn't go anywhere terribly interesting. Even the big "Bride of Frankenstein" scene carries little emotional weight, though I'll credit De Niro in trying to make something of it, even in brief glimpses. Sadly the latter portion of that performance is that. Branagh's direction doesn't really spend any time with the two men as characters, rather just kind of rams through the conflict in a sloppy and wholly detached way. This sadly leaving De Niro, much like his character, left in the middle of a ocean without really anywhere to go. De Niro I do think has something to say within the role, sadly it gets muted by some truly sloppy direction. 

Sunday, 18 October 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1994

And the Nominees Were Not:

Ben Kingsley in Death and the Maiden
 
Ge You in To Live
 
Temuera Morrison in Once Were Warriors
 
Shah Rukh Khan in Kabhi Ha Kabhi Na
 
Woody Harrelson in Natural Born Killers

Predict These Five, Those Five or Both:

Robert De Niro in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
 
Kevin Bacon in The River Wild
 
Tom Cruise in Interview With The Vampire
 
Brandon Lee in The Crow 
 
Xia Yu in In the Heat of the Sun

Friday, 12 July 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Results

5. Tony Leung Chiu-Wai in Chungking Express- Tony Leung gives a nice charming performance even if it is fairly simplistic.

Best Scene The Cop reveals he has bought the snack shop.
4. Ralph Fiennes in Quiz Show- Fiennes gives a strong performance showing both the man performing to become a media sensation, but as well the very well real man whose fairly reasonable desires suck him into creating the false image of himself.

Best Scene: Charles Van Doren confesses to his father.
3. Johnny Depp in Ed Wood-Depp gives a very good performance by creating a genuine character who always stays optimistic no matter how bad he is at his true passion.

Best Scene: Ed talks Bela out of suicide. 
2. Tim Robbins in The Shawshank Redemption- Robbins gives a great performance where he works with the film to create some truly beautiful scenes throughout.

Best Scene: Andy tells Red how he "killed" his wife.
1. Gary Oldman in Immortal Beloved- This one was difficult for me to choose this is one where I won't say this is necessarily final Robbins who is great in a great film, Oldman is a my winner who is great in a sometimes problematic film. Oldman overcomes his film's problems creating a fascinating portrait of Ludvig Van Beethoven, and he manages to be compelling even when the film itself falters.

Best Scene: Beethoven on his death bed. 
Overall Rank:
  1. Tim Robbins in The Shawshank Redemption
  2. Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction  
  3. Gary Oldman in Immortal Beloved
  4. Ben Kingsley in Death and the Maiden
  5. Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption
  6. Nigel Hawthorne in The Madness of King George
  7. Xia Yu in In The Heat of the Sun
  8. Johnny Depp in Ed Wood
  9. Ralph Fiennes in Quiz Show
  10. Jim Carrey in Dumb and Dumber  
  11. Temuera Morrison in Once Were Warriors
  12. Gerard Depardieu in A Pure Formality
  13. John Travolta in Pulp Fiction
  14. Takeshi Kaneshiro in Chungking Express 
  15. Tom Cruise in Interview With the Vampire 
  16. Bruce Greenwood in Exotica
  17. Paul Newman in Nobody's Fool 
  18. Terence Stamp in The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert
  19. Jean Reno in Leon: The Professional 
  20. Roman Polanski in A Pure Formality 
  21. Christopher Eccleston in Shallow Grave
  22. Elias Koteas in Exotica
  23. Albert Finney in The Browning Version
  24. David Strathairn in The River Wild
  25. Zbigniew Zamachoswki in Three Colours: White
  26. Tony Leung Chiu Wai in Chungking Express
  27. Bruce Willis in Pulp Fiction 
  28. Oleg Menshikov in Burnt by The Sun
  29. Ge You in To Live
  30. Jack Thompson in The Sum of Us
  31. Guy Pearce in The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert 
  32. Stephen Dorff in Backbeat
  33. Jeff Daniels in Dumb and Dumber 
  34. Hugo Weaving in The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert 
  35. Russell Crow in The Sum of Us
  36. Wallace Shawn in Vanya on 42nd Street
  37. Kevin Bacon in The River Wild 
  38. Brandon Lee in The Crow
  39. Sihung Lung in Eat Drink Man Woman 
  40. Michael Keaton in The Paper
  41. Shah Rukh Khan in Kabhi Ha Kabhi Na
  42. Mel Gibson in Maverick 
  43. Ewan McGregor in Shallow Grave
  44. Sean Nelson in Fresh
  45. John Turturro in Quiz Show 
  46. Nikita Mikhalkov in Burnt by the Sun
  47. Philippe Noiret in Il Postino 
  48. Tim Roth in Little Odessa 
  49. Vincent Perez in La Reine Margot
  50. Woody Harrelson in Natural Born Killers 
  51. Leslie Cheung in Ashes of Time
  52. Jim Carrey in The Mask 
  53. Robert De Niro in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
  54. Tommy Lee Jones in Blue Sky
  55. Jeremy Davies in Spanking the Monkey
  56. Tom Hanks in Forrest Gump
  57. Ian Hart in Backbeat
  58. Andy Garcia in When a Man Loves a Woman
  59. Edward Furlong in Little Odessa
  60. Larry Pine in Vanya on 42nd Street 
  61. Jackie Chan in Legend of the Drunken Master
  62. Harrison Ford in Clear and Present Danger 
  63. Hugh Grant in Four Weddings and A Funeral
  64. Patrick Stewart in Star Trek Generations
  65. Danny Dun in Confucian Confusion
  66. Tony Leung Ka-Fai in Ashes in Time
  67. Tim Allen in The Santa Clause   
  68. Leslie Nielsen in Naked Gun 3 1/3
  69. Keanu Reeves in Speed  
  70. Brad Pitt in Interview with The Vampire
  71. Stuart Wilson in Death and the Maiden
  72. Kurt Russell in Stargate
  73. Arnold Schwarzenegger in True Lies
  74. Tim Robbins in The Hudsucker Proxy
  75. Rob Morrow in Quiz Show
  76. John Cusack in Bullets Over Broadway 
  77. Tim Robbins in IQ 
  78. Jason Scott Lee in The Jungle Book
  79. Massimo Troisi in Il Postino 
  80. Kevin Costner in Wyatt Earp
  81. Jeff Anderson in Clerks
  82. James Spader in Stargate  
  83. Lee Kang-sheng in Vive L'Amour
  84. Chen Chao-jung in Vive L'Amour
  85. Mackenzie Astin in Iron Will
  86. Billy Crystal in City Slickers II
  87. Jim Carrey in Ace Ventura Pet Detective
  88. Eddie Murphy in Beverly Hills Cop III
  89. Alec Baldwin in The Shadow  
  90. Allen Payne in Jason's Lyric
  91. Joseph Gordon-Levitt in Angels in The Outfield 
  92. Rick Moranis in Little Giants 
  93. Tommy Lee Jones in Cobb 
  94. Brian O'Halloran in Clerks
  95. John Goodman in The Flintstones 
  96. Willem Dafoe in Tom & Viv
  97. Macaulay Culkin in Richie Rich  
  98. Peter Berg in The Last Seduction
  99. Nicolas Cage in Guarding Tess
  100. Kenneth Branagh in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein 
  101. Brad Pitt in Legends of the Fall
  102. Liam Neeson in Nell 
  103. Jean Claude Van Damme in Street Fighter 
  104. Jeff Bridges in Blown Away
  105. Macaulay Culkin in The Pagemaster
  106. Dylan McDermott in Miracle on 34th Street
  107. Luke Edwards in Little Big League
  108. Brad Renfro in The Client
  109. Michael Patrick Carter in Milk Money 
  110. Robert Wuhl in Cobb
Next Year: 1994 Supporting

Thursday, 11 July 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1994: Tim Robbins in The Shawshank Redemption

Tim Robbins did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for Sag, for portraying Andy Dufresne in The Shawshank Redemption.

Despite the Shawshank Redemption having been nominated for best picture and the secondary lead/narrator Morgan Freeman being nominated for best actor, Tim Robbins who plays the primary lead was not Oscar nominated. This in part may have been due to the nature of the character of Andy Dufresne and the way that Robbins plays him. Robbins plays a man who is convicted of the murder of his wife and her lover and is sentenced to life in prison even though he is in fact innocent. Even though that is the case Robbins does not actually go out of his way to make Dufresne likable and in fact shows why he would be unable to gain sympathy from the judge and jury as well why some prisoners would see him as stuck up. 

Tim Robbins does not make Andy the traditional hero of the institution in same way Paul Newman did Cool Hand Luke or Jack Nicholson in One Flew over the Cuckoos Nest, instead Robbins makes Andy a much colder hero who tries to find life in the prison not so much through a intense radical energy, but instead through far more deliberate and precise action. Robbins colder take is the right approach as it allows there to be a mystery in Andy as a character, and not just in regards to whether or not he committed the murder. Robbins as well allows a certain mystery in terms of the motivation of his action within the prison that only adds to his character without making him seem underdeveloped.

Andy Dufresne is not like the rest of the prisoners and Robbins is very effective in portraying this. It is not just because he is an actually innocent man, but Robbins gets across the way Defresne is never just another one of the men. This is not to say he is apart from them or anything close to being a snob as some of the men believe him to be. Instead Robbins brings about this resilience in Andy that is tremendous. It is something quite subtle in his performance, and not really something that stands right out. It is always there in his portrayal though of Andy as there is that extra element in the man that keeps his soul alive even while his body is imprisoned.

Robbins though does not make Dufrense some sort of immortal man, or some otherworldly creature who has a supernatural barrier around. Robbins makes him still a man in a horrible situation, even if he does have that resolve in him not to ever be destroyed by it. He physically captures the role though in the scenes of distress particularly when he is abused by the guards, other prisoners, and the evil warden. The strength in Andy is shown in Robbins's performance by the fact that Andy is never full defeated. There is something within him always that keeps his head above the water, something that always allows him to overcome any hardship that he faces in the prison.

The crux of his performance though is his chemistry with Morgan Freeman's Red the long time prisoner who is also the prison scrounger. Their relationship is interesting one because although the friendship is very understated yet so very poignant. There discussions about life in and outside of the prison are always quiet, but always just so absolutely genuine in the connection Robbins and Freeman portray between the two men. In these conversations Robbins also gets to reveal more to Andy as a character. There is not a lot about his past but in the parts he reveals he is very moving in showing the regrets in the man not due to the murder he was accused of, but due to the mistakes he had made in his past.

Robbins has a certain flow with the material here that brings to life the power of the story wonderfully. It is rather interesting in for the most par this is not one of those loud passionate performances that enforces the theme of the film. Robbins's performance is largely underplayed and his performance works in tandem with Frank Darabont's direction. There are so many beautiful moments in the film and most are a combination of visual, story, music, character, and the performances. Not a single one of these elements overwhelms the other making such an emotional impact. Where Robbins stands within them is in that face of satisfaction, a purely good satisfaction from the humanity Andy manages to bring back to the men within the institution.