Showing posts with label 1962. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1962. Show all posts

Monday, 8 November 2010

Best Actor 1962: Results

5. Burt Lancaster in Birdman of Alcatraz- Burt Lancaster does his best despite Robert Stroud being an incredibly oddly written character. Lancaster does succeed as much as he can with his material, and does show his charisma and star quality almost throughout the film.
4. Marcello Mastroianni in Divorce Italian Style- Mastroianni is downright hilarious, and creates a brilliant performance of deadpan brilliance. His performance is simple at times by always appropriately so, and always to maximize the hilarity of his performance.
3. Gregory Peck in To Kill A Mockingbird- Gregory Peck gives an especially effective and just about perfect performance as Atticus Finch. He is especially brilliant in his creation of Atticus which is absolutely magnificent. He also adds the right heart in his scenes with the children, and the right power and passion especially in his final speech at the trial.
2. Jack Lemmon in Days of Wine and Roses- Lemmon gives a brilliant and searing performance. Lemmon excels in all of his scenes, first carefully suggesting his alcoholism early on, but later having truly chilling moments involving his most troubled moments of alcoholism. A truly brilliant performance that is sometimes hard to watch simply because he is so good.
1. Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia- Peter O'Toole gives a performance of true greatness as Lawrence. He not only holds interest throughout his long running film, but he also shows an incredible unique portrait of a fascinating man. His transition of all forms are brilliantly shown, and he gives a performance of utter brilliance. O'Toole is absolutely perfect in every moment of his incredible performance, that I think is one of the greatest, and certainly O'Toole's best.

Deserving Performances:
James Mason in Lolita

Sunday, 7 November 2010

Best Actor 1962: Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia

Peter O'Toole received his first Oscar nomination for portraying T.E. Lawrence in Lawrence of Arabia.

Lawrence of Arabia is simply a fantastic film, a true epic, that is both a spectacular sight to behold, but also is brilliantly written, showing the interesting relationships between nations, and creating incredibly complex and memorable characters. On an interesting Oscar related side note this film has  not only Peter O'Toole who has the most unsuccessful Best Actor Nominations but also Claude Rains and Arthur Kennedy who share the most unsuccessful supporting actor Oscar nominations.   

Peter O'Toole seemed to be tailor made to play Lawrence, if it was not for their height difference I would say O'Toole is almost a dead ringer for the real Lawrence in this film. Like Gregory Peck from this year, O'Toole from the creation of the part just seems perfect for the part. I never for a moment question him as Lawrence, and this is something that is very good for his performance. He never needs to try to convince me he is Lawrence and merely is this saves time for O'Toole in a way, and adds no unneeded distractions in his performance such as a voice or mannerisms. Again like Gregory Peck seemed to be the only person who could be Atticus Finch, and only Peter O'Toole could really be T.E. Lawrence, which is a true achievement since unlike Atticus Finch, Lawrence was a real person.

Peter O'Toole also does something that seems rather simple in this part, but is essential to the success of the film. That is he is always completely watchable for the entire length of this very long film. His performance always remains interesting throughout the film, never loses his charisma or energy for a moment. This is very much needed for a long epic such as this, since O'Toole stays watchable he and the film never become at all boring, or tiresome, and the film stays interesting for its whole running time. O'Toole stays watchable therefore he stays as a character you can follow throughout this gigantic epic in a very similar way one could follow Vivien Leigh through Gone With The Wind, which is a true achievement. 

Peter O'Toole fulfills the role of a lead in an epic completely but his role is not that of a simple hero in anyway. O'Toole shows the various aspects of Lawrence brilliantly despite how strange and complicated some aspects of the character can be. O'Toole is particularly effective in showing Lawrence and his transformations throughout the film which are many and many different complications. One of his transformation is his original position of a fairly unassuming solider, who follows his orders and goes deep into the desert. He is a rather plain spoken man who wishes to learn and O'Toole early shows the proper earnestness and understanding of Lawrence as he finds out more about the Arab people. He shows both a great interest in their ways but later and distaste when his original guide is killed simply because the guide drank from the wrong water well. O'Toole mixes Lawrence feeling well, it seems fairly simple at times, but O'Toole is also the viewers guide into this life and O'Toole excels in this spectacularly well.

Lawrence though soon gains more knowledge of the Arabs, and transitions from an outsider to not one of them but something different. He becomes of Arabia but not an Arab in a odd but fascinating fashion. He gains their trust through his ability, and his connection with them. O'Toole here creates another presence that is larger than life. His gain in confidence and control is shown to have always been there by O'Toole and something that finally needed a chance to be realized. He becomes a hero of sorts to the Arabs, because of his command and charisma. It is certainly a challenge for O'Toole to have the right charisma and power in his performance but he does. I never questioned his ability to calm and lead the people who were incredibly energetic, and very much unsubdued. O'Toole is able to prove this great ability of Lawrence without absolutely no faults which is simply incredible.

O'Toole is fascinating also in showing an aspect of Lawrence that the film did not even need to draw attention but it does, and adds greatly to the character of Lawrence. This is the idea of Lawrence's masochism at first that slowly turns into sadism. The film does not draw that much attention to the film but it is shown with incredibly subtlety by O'Toole, the film overtly mentions briefly but the transition is all up tot O'Toole. Early on he shows his ability to hold a match for long, and his slight strange pleasure he clearly shows in his face when he blows out his match.

He changes over the film to sadism, a sadism that grows within in Lawrence, which O'Toole shows carefully and all too effectively. His pleasure he shows when he executes a friend of his is chilling because O'Toole shows it with complete naturalism. His love of killing grows and O'Toole is coldly realistic despite this oddity of Lawrence especially in his scene where he tells the General that he enjoyed killing. It is truly fascinating because O'Toole does not turn him into a psychopath but rather a man who simply gets an odd pleasure from killing which seems far more chilling than if he was just a psychopath. O'Toole is particularly haunting in his revenge scene where the purest brutality of Lawrence comes out when he calls for no prisoners. A that whole sequence O'Toole is truly freighting showing how Lawrence has changed and how his enjoyment of causing pain had grown to such a point.

O'Toole still has one last point of his performance which is the most compelling and essential. That is Lawrence's growing madness of sorts. Not the traditional madness of going insane or his sadism, but his growth of his belief that he is some sort of savior to the Arab people. O'Toole brilliantly suggests this early by Lawrence's confidence in his plans and his abilities. He brilliantly leads this to his own view of himself growing larger and larger in his eyes. He is especially strong because Lawrence starts fairly unsure at the first moment. He grows though but not completely after an early victory. But he shows both a confidence and fear when he announces his victory to his command. He shows that Lawrence seems partially afraid and partially astounded by what he has done and what he is becoming. Lawrence even more so develops his own image of being this odd savior to these people. O'Toole excels in showing Lawrence's larger than life dementia of sorts, something that seems completely odd and impossible, but isn't because O'Toole makes it so. He becomes a man of complete power and control, over these people, a man who believes many serve his cause simply because he is the one in charge. This aspect of his performance is awe inspiring to behold, and simple magnificent.

Here is a performance that is simply perfect, yet all too incredible because Lawrence is a complex character, one of the most complex in a film. O'Toole finds the right tone, the right madness, and the right reality for every aspect of Lawrence's psyche. O'Toole performance is one that I could write and write about because there is simply so much to it. Every single scene O'Toole shows such magnificence in his performance, that only the greatest of performances can have. O'Toole never seems false or strange but real, and makes Lawrence completely as Lawrence should be. O'Toole's performance has so much to it that I could not really even described completely everything there is to his performance. I did not even mention many of his incredible individual scenes showing Lawrence's history with Ali (Omar Sharif),or spectacular single scenes such as when he fakes the proper British mannerisms in an odd attempt to fit in with the world where he is not more than a man. This is performance that I find is something that is truly awesome to behold. O'Toole performance is one that I believe should be considered even more legendary than it is, it is that great and perfect in my opinion.

Best Actor 1962: Gregory Peck in To Kill A Mockingbird

Gregory Peck won an Oscar from his fifth and final Oscar nomination for portraying Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird.

To Kill A Mockingbird is a very effective drama film with an interesting story, and a incredible sense of place.

 Atticus Finch is a character who is fairly simple yet for some reason terrific. He is one of the most upstanding characters, yet he does not seem one dimensional because of this, instead that just seems to be right for Atticus. Gregory Peck creates Atticus incredibly well just from the initial conception of the character he is perfectly developed. Everything physically about Peck in this performance just seems right and completely honest for Atticus. His posture and his demeanor just absolutely brilliant, he just is completely the character he never seems not to be Atticus, he is always the perfect honest southern lawyer. He just absolutely fits the part, everything he does adds to his portrayal and he makes it seem like no one else could be Atticus besides Peck.

Peck excels in every single scene he is in,  I particularly like how warm of a performance he gives. He really seems like the perfect father to the children, and Peck does this with the utmost grace and simplicity. He never seems to be trying to be the perfect father, the words of wisdom and discipline that come with Atticus always are absolutely natural from Peck. He tells his stories and comforts the children so naturally, that Peck is Finch in this role there is no question of that. He always adds the right amount of heart to every moment of speeches to the children. He never makes the scenes sappy or corny, but rather effective moments of the true unconditional love a father has for his children. Scout says that Atticus always said things in the right way and this is completely true because Peck always says everything in the right way a truly heart warming performance that earns every second of warmth it creates.

Peck most famous and most powerful scene does come during the trial of Tom Robinson. Peck first of all controls and stands out in the trial scene. He throughout it shows Atticus' brilliance in the courtroom, showing his knowledge and control of his situation. His best moment of the scene comes in the summation to the jury near the end of the trial. Peck in this final summation is simply magnificent. His performance at the end here always consistently gives me chills because he is so good. He stands on the screen for nine minutes, not a single second could I stop watching him. He is just incredible putting all truest passion, and power into the scene. His honest urging for the jury to find Robinson innocent is one of the most powerful speeches in film history, and that is due to Peck's pitch perfect performance. Overall Atticus is not in the film that much in fact one could possibly try to argue he is supporting but that matters not Peck is wonderful in this performance and makes the most of every second he has. This is the type of performance that seemed to be destined for Peck, and Peck met his destiny completely.

Thursday, 4 November 2010

Best Actor 1962: Marcello Mastroianni in Divorce, Italian Style

Marcello Mastroianni received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Ferdinando Cefalù in Divorce Italian Style.

Divorce, Italian Style is a really enjoyable Italian film. It is very strange at times, but also interesting to watch, and most importantly is very funny.

Marcello Mastroianni's performance in this film is a comedic performance the type that the academy does not like to nominate too much, since his performance is almost entirely comedic. His type of comedic is dead pan brilliance. Mastroianni creates Ferdinando so perfectly from the opening shot, where there is simply just something funny about him. Specifically what he does physically as Ferdinando. His posture he uses and that face he makes is just perfect. The way he is always looking is simply hilarious and really works brilliantly along with a character who is planning to murder his own wife to go marry his cousin. This concept could seem  too dark but is instead hilarious due to the script, and due to Mastroianni perfect expressions throughout the movie.

Mastroianni is great in every scene getting every laugh he can possibly get with the script with his perfect timing and delivery. I really like how you hear his thoughts along with his voice. You know what he is thinking but the other character do not. Do to this there is always a joke to be let in on by his reactions which are always perfect always adding the humor to his scenes. I like him throughout the film but there are some specific scenes I thought were incredibly good. I like especially the scene where he looks at himself in the mirror admiring his looks and charm, but slightly saddened by his stomach. Simply brilliant Mastroianni is because it is a pretty simple moment, but Mastroianni makes the most of it with his humorous performance. One other scene I really liked was a pivotal scene where he is partially beaten too his objective, his reaction with "What about my honor?" he could not be better his hangdog expression is perfectly hilarious.

This performance really is a simple brilliant comedic performance, that despite the fact his character never really changes, nor does he have that many emotional scenes it is an incredible accomplishment. I found myself liking this amoral jerk, because of Mastroianni is so funny and charming. He really takes this role and shows how good a comedic performance can be in the simplest sense. It really is genius work because he never seems to go for laughs precisely but he certainly got them from me. He created his whole character brilliantly with his face his cigarette, and walk. He never misses a chance for humor with his character. I could not get enough of him in this he is that good, I could have certainly watched the further adventures of this rather stupid man who thinks he is so smart, because Mastroianni's performance is just comedic gold.

Wednesday, 3 November 2010

Best Actor 1962: Jack Lemmon in Days of Wine and Roses

Jack Lemmon received his fourth Oscar nomination for portraying Joe Clay in Days of Wine and Roses.
Days of Wine and Roses is an effective drama about alcoholics. I thought it was particularly effective because it did not start with the character basically dying from alcohol but it showed what lead to it very well.

Jack Lemmon received his first dramatic Oscar nomination after a three Oscar nominations for comedic performances. This certainly was his chance to shine in a dramatic sense. He begins in the film, with his character as a not overly spectacular sort of man who works as a public relations man for a company that requires him to do sometime degrading work like finding women for a party. Lemmon does not go for any cheap laughs with his behavior with this performance. He does not try to do any of his standard Lemmon behavior and plays Joe as a pretty standard person, that there is not anything that special about, and that is what leads to the strength later on in his performance. One thing Lemmon did brilliantly early on with his performance was his extremely subtle indications of his future alcoholism. Lemmon carefully showed him hold onto his drink a little tighter, and a little harder perhaps than a common social drinker. This was something small but somethign brilliant Lemmon did.

Joe soon finds love in the secretary Kristen (Lee Remick) of one of the people he works for. Their relationship works because both Lemmon and Remick really try for a pretty realistic romance. They conflict at first, but only briefly. They never seem to be going for an over the top Hollywood romance, and play it as just two people who have fallen in love which works far more effective. The two eventual find something which they have a lot of fun together that is of course Alcohol. The way Lemmon introduces her to it, is brilliantly played by Lemmon as him just basically wanting her in one the fun with him. Fun is also what they do have together, and their natural fun they have while drinking is both fascinating and disturbing. It is difficult thing to show the fun they are having without over doing it or making it disingenuous but both are actors pull it off magnificently.

Now after awhile of being married and drinking the adverse effects of drinking start to show, which allows Lemmon to really triumph in his performance. The first extreme indication of how bad the effect on him comes from an outburst against his wife when he cannot find a drink. Lemmon leads to these problems particularly well showing how Joe is always very much attached to his drinking and carefully shows how it grows on him. His first outburst though really is terrifying because how real Lemmon is and how cruel Joe becomes while looking for drinking having an intense hate for everyone and everything. Joe immediately calms down after he has a drink, and becomes regretful. Lemmon shows Joe, with pure realism, and it is really chilling scene because of Lemmon great performance.

They both are no longer able to keep a job to support their drinking and their daughter so they live with Kristen's father (Charles Bickford). In the sequences at his green house they are simply fascinating, first in their scene where Joe sneaks in Alcohol. The way they drink it and enjoy, it has the right oddity to it that really is disconcerting. There seems something odd, and unnatural about what they are doing, yet it rings completely true due to the drunken joy the two bring in the role, something that is almost disturbing. Not as disturbing though as the scene where Lemmon goes to look for another one in a pot in the greenhouse during a thunder storm. His breakdown in this scene is frightening creating a nightmarish scene through his performance, that simply feels almost too real. It is a brilliant scene and a remarkable feat from Lemmon.

Similar scenes come afterward which are almost hard to watch because Lemmon seems so real. His jerky and reactions in the sanitarium, are truly great feats of acting, that show Joe's problem is not just an addiction but a disease for him. Lemmon is brilliant in these scenes but he is also brilliant in the scenes of his recovery. Lemmon shows how Joe struggles to stay sober, and in fact loses it once, and relapses. Joe though pulls through that, and becomes rather regretful of his actions, and his inability to make Kristen to recover too. Lemmon has brilliant scenes in which he really shows the experience of Joe, which he internalizes perfectly. His greatest scene though at the end though is when he confronts Kriten after she has delved deeper in alcoholism, but Joe has recovered finding a job, being sober, and living successfully while raising his daughter. This final scene they have together is truly heartbreaking scene, where Joe struggles to reject her because she won't give up her drinking even though he still loves her. Lemmon's final speech is magnificent, and a truly honest portrait of a man who cannot keep with his true love, and he knows it is partially his fault that she drinks. The scene ends with her leaving, and him calling out once but holding himself back because he knows he has to. Lemmon is fantastic with this final scene putting the full amount of truth, and heart into his performance. This scene and the rest of his performance are truly remarkable feats of acting, and Lemmon certainly shows himself here to be a brilliant dramatic actor.

Best Actor 1962: Burt Lancaster in Birdman of Alcatraz

Burt Lancaster received his third Oscar nomination for portraying prisoner Robert Stroud in Birdman of Alcatraz.

Birdman of Alcatraz is a problematic film for a few reasons. The most obvious is the real Robert Stroud. The film wants to show prison as problematic and hindering great minds, and that even changes are only for conformity. This might have worked if Stroud was not reportedly a psychopath in real life, therefore trying to make him look like a great hero is just wrong. The other problem was I did not even sympathize with the sanitized version of Stroud, because there was one thing they did not change and that was his two murders. The film does not show the first but the second instantly made me not be able sympathize with him. Sure the guard was a bit of a jerk, but Stroud certainly had no right to kill him. That in itself makes the film fail in its point, they should have instead used the bird loving ideas, and fictionalized the rest including the main character in name and personality because Robert Stroud seemed to honestly be an a very bad person. All in all I still did enjoy watching the film to a degree and after 1991 I really see that older most of the time are better even when deeply flawed.

The portrait of Stroud early on actually hinders Lancaster's performance. Stroud early on is shown to belligerent and some what psychopathic. He acts angry to the Warden who really is at first just doing his job, and he acts psychotically to other inmates over his mother despite the other inmates only very passively asking about her. Still Lancaster is properly effective in showing the defiant and somewhat psychotic Stroud. He shows the appropriate inner anger to the man, and possibly hinting at his psychotic, and mother's boy nature intertwined quite well. The only problem with this is this portion of the character and Lancaster's performance is completely forgotten about for the rest of the film. Once his sentence for killing a guard is changed to life sentence the film and Lancaster completely change the portrayal of Stroud suddenly. It is not really Lancaster's fault that is characterization is not consist it is the direction and script which makes him change so quickly and not even allowing him time for a character transition period.

After this initial scene Stroud is shown to be a fairly pleasant man who dislikes the prison system, but plays by its rules mostly. He calmly spends his time in his cell. I will admit there is a slight hint of the earlier portrayal but not much of one. Early Lancaster acts as a bit of a jerk demanding everything from his friendly guard without ever thinking of common curtsy. He gets over this flaw too to become almost a perfect man by finally thanking the guard. Lancaster acts his slight jerky nature well, enough but after that short part Lancaster finally settle as Stroud, as just a decent man who tries to live a life while calmly fighting the conforming prison system. I think Lancaster does well despite how simple his character ends up becoming. I did certainly find him always watchable, and certainly knew how to command the screen even when he was just washing a bird cage or building one. Somehow despite doing so little in these scenes where he takes care of birds Lancaster stays watchable, which obviously shows how and why he was such a star.

Still the film presents more problems for Lancaster due to the strangeness of some of its plot elements. For example Stroud marries a woman who he started a bird business with. They get married in attempt so he can stay where he is with his birds. There scenes at first are brief, and unromantic including when he proposes to her. But later in the film it their last scene together it is implied they actually loved each other which was not earned by the film. Lancaster does try to make this and all of the other elements tossed together in Stroud's character. Lancaster does a fine job despite the poor writing of Stroud, which really is some sort of achievement. The writing though stops him from giving a great performance. His best scenes are his scenes of the agreed Stroud. Lancaster subtle shows a man who now has come to treasure life, and the idea of freedom. He both obviously states this with the proper passion but also shows it carefully in his eyes and his face.  The film never helps him but he still gives an okay performance.

Monday, 1 November 2010

Best Actor 1962

And the Nominees Were:

Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia

Jack Lemmon in Days of Wine and Roses

Gregory Peck in To Kill a Mockingbird

Marcello Mastroianni in Divorce, Italian Style

Burt Lancaster in Birdman of Alcatraz  

Who do you predict, who do you pick?