Monday 21 February 2022

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2021: Tony Leung Chiu Wai in Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings

Tony Leung Chiu Wai did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Xu Wenwu in Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings. 

Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings feels like a compelling martial arts saga stuck somewhat in the confines of the marvel formula, leading it to be a somewhat middle of the road film for the studio, where a greater film seemed possible if it leaned a bit more into being different.

Tony Leung is the man who needs no introduction here and also requires no de-aging technology no matter when a scene takes place. I'll admit I was somewhat bemused by the amount of viewers discovering the charismatic Leung for the first time, as with even a cursory knowledge of Hong Kong cinema, one will be well aware of the remarkable performer that is Tony Leung. For the longest time, despite having a natural command of the English language, Tony Leung had not taken a western role, so this was a notable event for anyone with an interest of Leung as a performer. And the film in its opening seems aware of this as we follow Leung, in a nearly silent performance, as Xu Wenmu, with his ten rings, as he defeats and conquers various enemies. And in this sequence, even with all the visual effects, Leung is the most compelling aspect just as the magnetic performer he is even when just portraying a direct menacing kind of determination. Leung never leaves it to a singular note even as he is just showing a man basically seen as the unstoppable one. The introductory sequence ends with Xu meeting Ying Li (Fala Chen) in the mystical land Ta Lo. Leung is wonderful in this scene by managing to show even in the action scene the way Xu is both baffled and wholly impressed if not quite intrigued by this woman who is able to to defeat him despite his power. Leung naturally establishing in this sequence the two essentials of the role, the ruthless ambition of the character and the love for his wife that will be Ying Li. He does so with ease and that charisma of his, while also setting up a great villain. 
 
Leung however doesn't really appear again, despite a few very brief flashbacks of him, as we establish our hero, Xu's son Shang-chi (Simu Liu), until he comes to find his children after they left him. The moment Leung re-enters a scene, he instantly owns the screen. Leung uses his natural charisma here so effectively, as never the literal tallest man in a scene, he nevertheless has the most commanding presence. Leung captures one's attention with ease, but does more than that. Just the way we see him as he captures his two children, Leung does so with that ease of menace, but also the clear pride in his eyes of the man appreciating his children's skills even as they technically defy him. "The family gathering" scene is exceptional work from Leung, and goes to show what an actor can bring to a scene. This as the scene ostensibly is there to establish  Xu as the technical "Mandarin" while deriding the previous iterations of the character both in the films and the comics. While one can immediately appreciate just how commanding Leung's voice is in English, to the point I would love to see him act in the language again, he also shows how much one can convey with the subtext of performance. Leung just as he is playing the villain in the derision of the situation, there's also this patriarchal wisdom as accentuates the importance of one's name, and shows as much as Xu is a villain there is a convincing belief in one's past. Leung as naturally evokes the still potent sense of grief for the loss of his wife in this speech, that there is no simplicity to, rather it is essentially the reckoning of his moral character as man whose hate is defined by love in a way. 

We are then granted more substantial flashbacks where we see the married life of Xu and Ying, where there is a sweet chemistry, and Leung brings a natural warmth both in those interactions we see and the moments of Xu seemingly content as a family man. Leung's best scene in a way might be a kind of brief one, where after the death of Ying due to Xu's enemies, we see Leung just contemplating on what has happened. Leung portrays the grief, the sense of guilt, but also the intensity of revenge as he decries the changes his wife tried to make out of him. Although really only like a minute long Leung shows the entire emotional distress of the man in the moment and the change to becoming a worse self. This followed by Leung emerging as just the cold villain who encourages his son to only live life through violence and for revenge. Leung's performance accentuating hatred rather than love, though always in the hate there is this sort of vulnerability in it of a man suffering for it. These are not even long scenes, or really all that deep as written, it is Leung's performance that finds such real nuance and complexity that it is pretty outstanding given how short these scenes are. Although I'll admit this creates also a point of frustration because while we see what Leung can do with this limited material, one can't help but wonder, why they don't give Leung more to do.

Where the film suffers is when half way through the film they introduce CGI monsters, who have no motivation other than they're evil, who show up even later, and whose main purpose is to release an even bigger CGI monster who is just bluntly evil. Not only does this feel sloppy because they're introduced so late, it also feels so tacitly connected to who we thought was the real villain in Xu. The way the film establishes its conflict is within the family, and the climax should be between Xu and Shang-Chi, and while that is in the film it seems somewhat rushed and the complexity removed that way we can instead get to the fight against the CGI monster. The worst sin of this decision is that it really undercuts the complexity of Leung's turn. He does his best to bring something between the singular determination to bring his wife back and the final glimpse of love for his son, however so much feels left on the table because of the rush to get to soul sucking demons. The balance isn't found between the two, and instead Xu sadly seems like a foot note to the real conflict against the big monsters, which again feels more formulaic, and whole lot less interesting. Every time a great actor is cast in a Marvel film I always am concerned that they may be easily wasted in some lame expository role, rather than properly utilized for their talents. Well thankfully this was not the case with Tony Leung's whose talents did nicely comes across still, however the choices of the third act did leave some wasted potential. It's a shame because honestly with a lesser actor I think Xu could've been an entirely forgettable villain. Leung prevents that, but his performance in a way shows what is lacking in this film. There was so much more to explore in the father/son dynamic if it stuck with dealing with the idea of your father as the villain, who does love you, but that is part of the issue. Instead this is too easily abandoned in favor of a more mainstream digestible conflict of "evil scary monsters are evil". If the film had stuck to a smaller scale finale, it could've stayed with the central conflict, and I think we would've gotten a far more potent ending, at the very least we would've gotten more Leung. Instead we get some Leung, which is in a way enough, but still not enough. 

28 comments:

Robert MacFarlane said...

I still can't believe he even accepted the role.

Calvin Law said...

Happy with this review, he did all he could with the role and a bit more even though I agree the CGI heavy third act leaves a bit on the table (still a 5 for me nevertheless). I am glad he’s gotten more eyes on him from audiences who strangely never exposed to him before - the number of film buffs who’d never seen a Wong Kar-wai film!!!

Really hoping he gets a review for Happy Together, incidentally.

Matt Mustin said...

He's a five for me. I thought he took a stock villain and made him a truly tragic portrait of being so deep in grief he can't see anything else.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: what ‘prestige’ Western directors would you like to see Leung work with? Particularly since Wong Kar-wai is, to put it mildly, not very active.

Louis Morgan said...

Also watched Death on the Nile, which I enjoyed even if I felt like half the cast gave underwhelming or bad performances. I enjoyed though Branagh's twists to the original narrative and do appreciate him trying to bring back the all star mystery in a largely traditionalist way even if very imperfectly.

Branagh - 4
Bateman - 2.5
Bening - 2.5
Brand - 3.5(There's something weird about a movie where he gives the most subtle turn in the film.)
Fazal - 2.5
French - 2.5
Gadot - 2.5
Hammer - 1.5
Leslie - 3
Mackey - 3.5
Okonedo - 2
Saunders - 2.5
Wright - 2

Calvin:

I'll admit the third act was especially disheartening when I read that Leung had physically trained for the role, it's like "give the man a proper practical fight scene!" but I digress.

Given his affection for Wong Kar-wai, I'd love to see Scorsese use him for something. I'd also love to see him lead something by Villeneuve or Refn, as his internalized approach could do wonders with their styles.

Matt Mustin said...

Considering the Wong Kar-wai influence on his work, I'd like to see Leung work with Barry Jenkins.

Calvin Law said...

Oh damn, I liked the cast a lot more than you, especially Okonedo and Bening. Glad you liked Brand though, thought the exact same thing.

100% agree on those three, Refn in particular would be an inspired choice. I could also see him working with Vinterberg as him and Mikkelsen share a lot of strengths in common with their presence.

Calvin Law said...

Matt: Oh that’s an incredible choice. Would love to see him under a Jenkins close-up.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Why do you think Benedict Cumberbatch excelled in portraying an American (a western cowboy to boot) in The Power of The Dog, whereas he underwhelmed in the films where he’s played one before?

Bryan L. said...

(To clarify, his accent as Doctor Strange has improved over time, but I just find it interesting that he played an American-as-it-gets character and nailed the part).

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Well one Campion typically is a better director than some of the other directors he's worked with when playing an American, I also think something about the specific period might've also worked in his favor, thick Boston (Black Mass), and thick Southern (The Mauritanian) are particularly tough to pull off, but I also just think Cumberbatch was bringing his A-game.

Robert MacFarlane said...

You know, the performance Cumberbatch reminded me most of was actually Neill in The Piano, if that makes any sense. Both play monsters with humanity and are defined by their insecurities.

Louis Morgan said...

And speaking of Cumberbatch, I finally settled. And he takes the win out of the nominees for me (though nothing against Washington, whose performance still is very very tempting). And the prediction winners were therefore Calvin, Robert and Moviefilm.

Matt Mustin said...

Campion pushed him and he was game to go right along with her, I think a lot of it really comes down to that.

Matt Mustin said...

I don't mean "pushed" in a forceful way, either. Maybe "challenged" was the better word.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Alright, I'll request another Campion man: Paul Schneider in Bright Star

Marcus said...

Here's a question I have about The Power of the Dog: how did George not get anthrax from giving the rope Phil made to Peter? Peter did use gloves to handle it at the end of the film, after all.

Matt Mustin said...

Marcus: Well, what I got is that the anthrax entered Phil's body through the wound on his hand. That's why there's that shot of his bleeding hand in the water as he tends to the hide.

Louis Morgan said...

Marcus:

Remember it wasn't the whole rope that was made out of the infected hides, just part of it. Although the rope still poses a danger if George were to get a wound and rub on the bad end of the rope, it isn't overly likely, the reason Phil got infected was because he had the cut on his hand, and he was tying it in water with the directly infected material.

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the screenplays of A Story of Floating Weeds and There Was A Father.

Oliver Menard said...

A Leung/Scorsese or Leund/Refn pairing sounds incredible. I didn't know I needed that until now.

Oliver Menard said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Bergmann's direction of Shame and A Virgin Spring.

Luke Higham said...

Probably the best MCU villain we've had to date.

Congrats to Cumberbatch on getting the win.

And can't wait for Ben Affleck next.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on Branagh.

Calvin Law said...

My request is Bronco Henry for Best Supporting Actor.

Okay, no…I’ll give my actual request down the line. I do love to see Benedict take the win though, he’s my choice too of the nominees.

HTT said...

Here's an update on what I've been watching:

Three days ago, I watched The Mitchells Vs. The Machines and holy sh*t, I loved it. I can't call it perfect, but it's charm spoke to me on such a level that I will admit that I considered giving it a 10. If this film loses to Encanto or Luca or something like that, I can't exactly say I will be happy.

9.9/10

Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/the-mitchells-vs-the-machines/

No cast ratings. Still haven't figured out how to rate voice performances.

That day, I also watched CODA, a film I was a bit underwhelmed by for the most part. The third act is by all means perfect, but the two other acts are a bit unengaging and boring.

7.9/10

Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/coda-2021/

Cast ratings:
Emilia Jones - 4/5
Marlee Matlin - 4/5
Troy Kotsur - 4.5/5
Eugenio Derbez - 2.5/5
Daniel Durant - 3.5/5

The day after that, I watched The Last Duel and I loved it. It had a bit of a slow start, but once I realized that it was basically medieval Rashomon, I was hooked. The format worked like a charm and the cast here is one of the year's best. Ridley still has it in him.

9/10

Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/the-last-duel-2021/

Cast ratings:
Matt Damon - 4/5
Adam Driver - 4.5/5
Jodie Comer - 5/5
Ben Affleck - 4.5/5

And yesterday, I finally watched Belfast. I don't exactly have any big problems with Belfast, it's just that it is a movie that literally has nothing to say. It isn't doing anything bad, it isn't doing anything good, it just is, making it an incredibly uninteresting film. I really hope this film doesn't win Best Picture.

5/10

Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/belfast/

Cast ratings:
Jude Hill - 4/5
Caitriona Balfe - 4/5
Jamie Dornan - 3.5/5
Judi Dench - 4/5
Ciaran Hinds - 4.5/5

HTT said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Louis Morgan said...

8000's & Oliver:

I'd save such requests, based on earlier years, until after I am done with the alternatives.

Calvin:

Well I'll give you the blank review with just a screen capture of Henry's old saddle.

Luke:

Branagh - (A strong reprise from him, and again, while he's not my favorite Poirot (Ustinov), I certainly do like him in the part. His approach overall that is much more emotional and in some ways more pompous. It fits well to Branagh's performance style and he brings the right sort of natural extravagant zest to his performance. Again though his portrayal creates more of an overt attachment to the case, and I do think Branagh did some strong work here in terms of showing Poirot's anger and sadness as he gets closer to the end of the case and it slowly gets far more personal for him.)