Saturday 25 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Results

10. Song Kang-ho in Broker - Song brings a  naturalistic and charming chemistry even if the film tasks him to go into some less than natural directions for this character late in the film. 

Best Scene: Seeing his daughter. 
9. Robert Pattinson in The Batman - Pattinson gives a great depiction of Batman that gives a greater insight within the development of the character and the different shades of his identity. 

Best Scene: "Bruce WAAAYNE"
8. Christopher Abbott in On the Count of Three - Abbott gives a captivating depiction of a man on an extreme mental edge that manages to be intense, heartwrenching but also at times rather funny. 

Best Scene: Seeing the high school bully. 
7. Mehdi Bajestani in Holy Spider - Bajestani gives an extremely disturbing portrayal of a man whose depravity goes far beyond just psychopathy. 

Best Scene: "Not Crazy"
6. Mark Rylance in The Outfit - Rylance amplifies his film every step of the way, giving a consistently captivating portrayal of a man who essentially weaponizes modesty. 

Best Scene: "I'm the mole"
5. Alexander Skarsgård in the Northman - Skarsgård delivers a powerful performance that goes beyond just his tremendous physical presence and also gives a potent portrayal of the emotional weight of his journey. 

Best Scene: The Queen's truth. 
4. Felix Kammerer in All Quiet on the Western Front - Kammerer gives a heartbreaking portrayal of the effects of war, both in terms of the bonds between soldiers and of the terrible mental degradation from the losses and horrors suffered throughout his experience. 

Best Scene: In the crater. 
3. Timothée Chalamet in Bones and All - Chalamet delivers for me his best performance, that offers an honest off-beat charisma, a fantastic chemistry with his co-star, and a powerful emotional vulnerability, all in his depiction of a cannibal. 

Best Scene: What really happened with his dad. 
2. Ralph Fiennes in The Menu - Fiennes gives an amazing performance that manages to be extremely intense, but also incredibly hilarious as his hate and regret filled killer chef. 

Best Scene: A cheeseburger. 
1. Park Hae-il in Decision to Leave - Park gives an entirely captivating and absolutely haunting portrayal of obsession. 

Best Scene: The snowy mountain.
Overall:
  1. Colin Farrell in The Banshees of Inisherin
  2. Park Hae-il in Decision to Leave
  3. Bill Nighy in Living
  4. Ralph Fiennes in The Menu
  5. Timothée Chalamet in Bones and All
  6. Felix Kammerer in All Quiet on the Western Front
  7. Paul Mescal in Aftersun
  8. Alexander Skarsgård in the Northman
  9. Mark Rylance in The Outfit
  10. Mehdi Bajestani in Holy Spider - 5
  11. Ram Charan in RRR
  12. N.T. Rama Rao Jr in RRR
  13. Christopher Abbott in On the Count of Three
  14. Robert Pattinson in The Batman
  15. Mark Rylance in The Phantom of the Open
  16. Song Kang-ho in Broker
  17. Adeel Akhtar in Ali & Ava
  18. Jonathan Majors in Devotion
  19. Denis Ménochet in As Bestas
  20. Daniel Giménez Cacho in Bardo
  21. Daryl McCormack in Good Luck To You, Leo Grande
  22. Eden Dambrine in Close
  23. Gang Dong-won in Broker
  24. Jeremy Pope in The Inspection
  25. Daniel Kaluuya in Nope
  26. Austin Butler in Elvis
  27. Gabriel Labelle in The Fabelmans
  28. Ricardo Darin in Argentina, 1985
  29. Brendan Fraser in The Whale
  30. Diego Calva in Babylon 
  31. Ben Foster in The Survivor
  32. John Boyega in Breaking - 4.5
  33. Daniel Craig in The Glass Onion
  34. Michael Ward in Empire of Light
  35. Adam Driver in White Noise
  36. Antonio Banderas in Puss in Boots: The Last Wish
  37. Jack Lowden in Benediction
  38. Jerrod Carmichael in On the Count of Three
  39. Colin Farrell in After Yang 
  40. Brad Pitt in Babylon
  41. Idris Elba in Three Thousand Years of Longing
  42. Nicolas Cage in The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent
  43. Adam Sandler in Hustle
  44. Harris Dickinson in Triangle of Sadness
  45. Rory Kinnear in Men
  46. Donald Elise Watkins in Emergency
  47. Peter Lanzani in Argentina, 1985
  48. Ali Junejo in Joyland
  49. Tom Cruise in Top Gun: Maverick
  50. Will Smith in Emancipation
  51. Viggo Mortensen in Crimes of the Future
  52. RJ Cyler in Emergency 
  53. Peter Capaldi in Benediction
  54. Sterling K. Brown in Hong For Jesus. Save Your Soul
  55. Kenneth Branagh in Death on the Nile - 4
  56. Colin Farrell in Thirteen Lives
  57. Viggo Mortensen in Thirteen Lives
  58. Jon Hamm in Confess Fletch
  59. Dali Benssalah in Athena
  60. Yahya Abdul-Mateen II in Ambulance
  61. Glen Powell in Devotion
  62. Benedict Cumberbatch in Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
  63. Christian Bale in The Pale Blue Eye
  64. Gregory Mann in Pinocchio
  65. Jake Gyllenhaal in Ambulance 
  66. Sami Slimane in Athena
  67. Elliott Crosset Hove in Godland
  68. Zach Efron in The Greatest Beer Run Ever
  69. Christoph Waltz in Dead for a Dollar
  70. Ryan Gosling in The Gray Man 
  71. Joe Alwyn in Stars At Noon - 3.5
  72. Daniel Radcliffe in Weird
  73. Chris Hemsworth in Thor: Love and Thunder
  74. Karl Urban in The Sea Beast 
  75. Luke Evans in Scrooge: A Christmas Carol
  76. Chris Evans in Lightyear 
  77. Jake Gyllenhaal in Strange World - 3
  78. Banks Repeta in Armageddon Time
  79. Sam Rockwell in See How They Run
  80. Brad Pitt in Bullet Train 
  81. Hugh Jackman in The Son - 2.5
  82. Eddie Redmayne in Fantastic Beats: The Secrets of Dumbledore 
  83. Sam Worthington in Avatar: The Way of Water
  84. Daniel Zolghadri in Funny Pages
  85. Will Ferrell in Spirited - 2
  86. John David Washington in Amsterdam
  87. Christian Bale in Amsterdam
  88. Ryan Reynolds in Spirited
  89. Chris Pratt in Jurassic World: Dominion
  90. Mason Thames in The Black Phone 
  91. Dwayne Johnson in Black Adam
  92. Peter Billingsley in A Christmas Story Christmas - 1.5
  93. Cooper Raiff in Cha Cha Real Smooth - 1
Next (eventually): 1961 Lead

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Mehdi Bajestani in Holy Spider

Mehdi Bajestani did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Saeed Hanei in Holy Spider. 

Holy Spider depicts a reporter trying to track a serial killer who targets prostitutes in Iran. 

Mehdi Bajestani plays the role of the serial killer, whom we know is the serial killer fairly quickly within the narrative, and the film is less about catching the killer than looking at the society around this killer. Bajestani's performance is bluntly very disturbing, and disturbing in a way that is unique within portrayals of a serial killer, no small feat in itself given how oft portrayed of a type of character it is. Bajestani's performance is disturbing in particular because it is so many things in it that make it such a chilling portrait of such a man. On the most immediate surface are the moments of the actual killings. The actual killings are extremely unnerving as Bajestani's performance accentuates two things that make Hanei such a nefarious figure. One aspect is the ease of the transition to the killings. Bajestani never portrays these moments as something that Hanei needs to work up rather the nature of the man is to kill and to kill is not something that is difficult for him. The actual killing that comes off as so quick, but also is truly so sickening is the sense of satisfaction that he presents in everyone. Bajestani doesn't portray it as an urge the man needs to control, rather it is the urge that propels him forward to do so at all times. It is something that gives him great satisfaction and we see this in his intense manner in every moment. It is very much a sexually vicious and horrible act and his face expresses this evil as the innate nature of the man simply doing what it does. 

The performance actually has some things in common with films like The Vanishing, because we also see the serial killer in his home life with his wife and son, as the loving family man. Bajestani is as convincing as the loving family man as the killer, but I think the interesting thing about his work is he doesn't put on a false face in either depiction. In both, he is the same man, and in a very disturbing sense, the man is as comfortable in both lives and therefore doesn't really even hide anything beyond avoiding being caught as a criminal. Bajestani honestly brings a great deal of warmth in the moments that Hanei is interacting with his son. He doesn't subvert either at any point he shows that the man does love his son at every one of his points. He even loves his wife as again Bajestani presents it with real sincerity. The man simply is living as a seemingly normal man successfully there is no strain to this there is nothing suggesting that he isn't comfortable in this life. This may seem like something is missing in Bajestani's performance but this choice to actually make the man as convincing in both lives is essential in crafting the true motivations of this man, which is in part psychopathy, but it isn't only psychopathy that fuels the man. As we see Bajestani doesn't portray the two sides of the man as the real and the fake, or the evil and the good, he rather shows the man at home, and the man living out essentially his hobby. 

We see this in the scenes before the killing itself which Bajestani portrays in a particularly insidious way because it is two-fold, one is the man going about his evil in a way, but the other is the man indulging even before he gets to the killing. We see the scenes of him with the prostitutes before the killing begins and Bajestani is again sincere in the enjoyment of the debauchery even before the killing. He shows that the man loves the act of playing with the prostitutes, not even as prey, but wholly with their services at first. Bajestani very much emphasizes the enjoyment of the man getting out of the fantasies he does enjoy as a pure hypocrite as we will later learn. And with that Bajestani reveals it as part of the disgusting process of the man indulging in this kind of behavior before going about the killing as this merged act. It isn't one other the other, but a combination that brings the man such horrible pleasure as he goes indulging in his appetite for sex and violence in equal measure. The key to this is one scene where one of the prostitute kind of equally enjoys the "game" at first and kind of plays with the whole twisted sensibility a bit. Bajestani is amazing in this scene because of just how scared he shows Hanei becomes in the moment. His manner becomes impotent and almost terrified as the woman gets the upper hand on him and questions him in a way. Bajestani shows the real sick pathetic nature of the man as the moment his fantasy is broken in the slightest he's completely lost. 

Hanei eventually gets caught when the reporter goes undercover and finds him. And the scene of Hanei getting arrested is where we enter the next phase of his performance which is equally disturbing just in a completely different way. This is when Hanei is approached by cops Bajestani basically plays with a kind of slightly ashamed but almost joyful manner of the man just as though he's going to need to explain something silly away. There is no sense of the man being concerned about being caught even rather there is almost a strange kind of pride in him as he's going to be called upon for his crimes. This only worsens as he stands trial for his crimes, despite the joy of his sexual depravity, he positions himself as a moral crusader against "low" women. Here is where we see such true insidious work by Bajestani because he presents Hanei as wholly believing his argument and selling every word of it with the utmost conviction. He is is a man who does believe himself in this delusion that he was doing the right thing all along. Bajestani's whole manner is as a moral crusader firebrand in the courtroom scenes. He brandishes his crimes as accomplishments without a hint of shame or anything other than a disparaging manner to his victims and a despicable attempt to portray himself as morally righteous. We see specific moments where he speaks this fact with his son around and his manner towards his son as basically "Look at what dad did", and Bajestani is outstanding in presenting this moral corruption with such ease. 

The only point in which there is any hesitation whatsoever on the side of Hanei is when his lawyers want to save him from the death penalty by presenting him as insane. Bajestani oddly shows the only pure humanity in the character in the little bit of concern he expresses in seeing how his son will see him if he is seen as insane. Of course, that bit of humanity is wrapped around the diseased idea that he is any kind of moral man and therefore needs to present himself as such to his son. Bajestani is fantastic because he is able to make this derangement so very natural in its state and shows the man basically getting gratification for his crimes based on believing it is what is right. Bajestani's whole performance is this twisted "on the stand testimony" moment of grandiose grandstanding, but for his hideous cause as refuses to be seen as crazy. Even after being sentenced to death Bajestani's performance still exudes a man so confident in his state of being that is particularly horrible to see as he so smugly takes in an "offer" from some men that instead of being executed he will be taken away to freedom. Bajestani through the whole process of Hanei's execution consistently shows this man still soaking up seemingly this sense of righteousness as though he will get away with his crimes, and makes these moments particularly frustrating because of how genuine they feel. In turn, it is hard not to feel some catharsis when it is revealed the whole "escape" was nothing but a ruse to get him to the execution chamber without raising a fuss. Bajestani's performance is great at the moment because you finally see the illusion shattered and since his imprisonment a real sense of fear of actually receiving justice for his crimes. Bajestani presents this as the man finally realizing that his society won't protect his hatred of women up to this point. Bajestani showing the fundamental fall of the man becoming a pathetic mess as he can no longer hold onto his delusions. This is a great performance by Mehdi Bajestani as he doesn't give one disturbing portrait of depravity but multiple. He is the psychopath, he is the disgusting sexual sadist, but perhaps worst of all, he is utterly convincing as a man who views his moral depravity as a righteous cause.   

Friday 24 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Park Hae-il in Decision to Leave

Park Hae-il did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Det. Jang Hae-jun in Decision to Leave. 

Decision to Leave is the captivating neo-noir of a detective dealing with the mysterious wife of a man who fell off a mountain. 

Park Hae-il fills a classical role, mixed in with a whole lot of different ideas from this genre as crafted by Park Chan-wook. You have at the center very much the lead of so many noirs, as the straightlaced detective whose moral state is questioned by a femme fatale, a bit of very directly the detectives from both versions of Insomnia, and of course a strong dose of Jimmy Stewart from Vertigo. We open the film fittingly then with Park as the upright detective, against his less-so partner Soo-wan, as they go about their duties in the police department. Park's performance leans into the strait lace in the way of just a very precise man as he goes about his initial duties. He speaks to Soo-wan with an innate kind of authority as he speaks about their ongoing investigation of a known murder. That is wrapped around the idea of the character being constantly in a state of insomnia. Park makes this a fundamental aspect of his performance, as there is just some pressure within him that speaks to this at all times. He succeeds importantly in making it a given in always seeming at least slightly tired in these opening scenes, and showing a man where there is just a cloud over him. He doesn't overdo it, doesn't make it too severe, but rather creates the quiet sense of the man's burdens in his job wrapped within this state. 

We see his theoretical solace with his wife Jung-an (Lee Jung-hyun), a nuclear power plant worker who lives away from the big city, where Jang visits only on the weekends. This relationship is interesting because it isn't quite the obvious bad relationship you might see in a lesser version of this story. Rather Jung-an is perfectly loving towards Jang in an often very flirtatious way even if in a slightly overbearing way in which she kind of diagnoses him and makes regular check-ins regarding the state of their relationship. Park doesn't present Jang's manner in this relationship as anything that is not pure in the stance of just trying to love Jung-an back as much as he can, as he makes always make dinner for them and certainly frequently attentively listens to her. Park doesn't present as something that is actively weighing on him in any way, however, what Park manages to do with his performance is show the way this relationship is very much a passive one for Jang. He shows that Jang is very much listening to his wife, but in a way too often just listening to the point she is always the one talking without really the natural give and take you might expect. Park presents the way Jang very much differs just into a state of malaise, not of one that seems actively painful, but at the same time, there is not the sense of comfort or intrigue in it either. They are together, but it isn't a sense of a striking connection by any means. 

What Park effectively does between the at-home scenes and his working scenes is show the contrast between the two sides of Jang and in a way show that at home Jang is very different, maybe too different, from his existence at work. Because at work, even with the sense of the man's insomnia, Park shows a man much more active and assured in his manner. He presents Jang as very much a detective with conviction as he goes about his task, and creates the right striking presence of someone with that innate drive within his profession. When he discovers a man who has died falling off a mountain even, Jang investigates this by going up the mountain the same way, and in presenting this Park's performance is very much of this sense of calculation and care to his approach as an investigator. Park does what is really essential for any great portrayal of a detective whom we are following, which is to bring the audience into his sense of investigative thinking, so we are with the detective rather than just merely watching him. Park achieves is this in any scene where Jang and his partner are investigating it is never just simple reaction shots from him, rather he consistently creates the potent sense of Jang's mind taking the various clues in and trying to decipher what it is that is going on at this crime scene. He manages within his performance to create the appropriate sense of the investigative mind that defines who detective Jang is. 

The key complication of the film is the death of the man which leads Jang and his partner to look at his much younger wife, also a Chinese immigrant, Song Seo-rae (Tang Wei). And this is the central relationship within the film which develops itself in very unexpected ways throughout the film. In the beginning, she is just a suspect, however, Park's performance effectively plants the seeds right away just in his reactions to seeing Seo-rae where there is this subtle sense of captivation in her. It could be mistaken for just the suspicion of a detective but soon it is clear more than that. We see this initially through the contrasting opinions of the case between the more seasoned and professional Jang, against his fairly slobbish partner Soo-wan (Go Kyung-pyo), who may be a bit of a slob however his suspicions about Seo-rae do make some good points. Park's performance is terrific in being able to find the nuance in this state of denial in approaching it as such. For example denies her lack of obvious grief with a bit of a poetic aside, which Park delivers with sincerity but sincerity that alludes to fascination. When asking her to do anything to get more information for the investigation, Park speaks every word with kindness, perhaps too much kindness, and an obviously kind of strict sort of patience. 

The development of the relationship between the two is quite fascinating because it isn't initially this standard sort of chemistry between the two. Rather initially it is of the flirtation between the surface. Such as when Park takes a more intimate photo of injuries she has sustained from her husband. Park initially falls into this expected professional routine of calling in a policewoman to handle the photo and is perfectly awkward in trying to avoid the more overt sexual nature of the moment. When Seo-rae balks at the suggestion, Park's reaction denotes this internalized intrigue in the act and the growth of an essential fascination with her even while technically going about his duty. And what we see Park cultivate in the successive scenes of further investigation, prodded on by Soo-wan who thinks Jang is smitten with the woman, we see in Park's performance a particularly potent combination in the act of observation. It is great to work as performed because Park is able to convey still Park's attempt to maintain his professional distance, however, when observing her there is this combination of a building intensity of obsession and this strange kind of comfort when observing her. Park doesn't present it as an obvious lust but rather the man experiencing some notions that he simply doesn't get from seeing his wife, and Parks shows Jang being pulled into woman's allure. 

Importantly in this progression towards obsession, we do see Jang still very much the professional in another seemingly more straightforward murder investigation where we see him take down one of the men with a strict sense of determination and really aliveness within the act. We see him further admonish Soo-wan less than deft hand at faulty interrogation, and Park is great in his delivery of the correcting description with a specific sense of duty within it. His eyes are disappointed towards Soo-wan as a teacher disappointed in a student going in the wrong direction. In all of this, we see Jang as the investigator a man in his wheelhouse who is great at his job. And with Seo-rae we see the meeting of the world of the potentially romantic with this world. And the interaction between the two really is about all the little moments of interaction that build towards something more substantial. That is in a suggestive glance, but also just the way the two eat a sushi meal together. I love the performance of Wei and Park in this scene because it isn't about going big in any kind of lust in that moment, rather the sense of this strict sort of pleasant comfort between the two in what is a normal act, made less so by circumstance but not by the process in which we see the two go about it. 

Seo-rae ends up becoming more than suspect, not as an obvious sort of lust-filled interest, but rather a genuine romantic interest as the two progress. As the two connect not based on overt sexuality but rather a connection of personal interest. And the two's chemistry is unusual because the development is more gradual almost as we see them through the first few dates of a relationship where both parties are a little bit reserved. Take just the moment when Park takes in their mutual interest in the sea, where Jang doesn't hold on to it long just long enough to appreciate it. Then when she visits his apartment, providing guidance on a murder investigation, the sheer energy in the expression of the act we see Park as a new man in some respects. When he cooks for her there is so much spirit to it, far less than a domestic chore. When she provides some ASMR to help get him to sleep, Park expresses the purest form of a man finding true relaxation in her lullaby of sorts. The performances of both Wei and Park in their sort of "date" scene are amazing to work because each, especially Park who shows Jang isn't trying to get anything extra out of it other than be with her, put so little weight in the scene. Rather if you took the scene in isolation it could nearly be just a wonderful full date between the two, as at the moment they no longer feel like detective and suspect but something far more. 

And for the rest of the review to go on a spoiler alert is essential to dive into the intricacies of it, as both murder investigations come to a head. The first is the street gangster which just deserves mention for Park's performance which is so different from the rest of his performance but it wholly works at the moment. When he has the criminal dead to rights but is still threatened with a weapon, Jang distracts him by noting his romantic concerns, and Park shifts his delivery wholly to something kind of overtly romantic and of a different man from Jang. As almost a comic moment that wholly works though as we see it as a play, even if there seems some genuine emotion in it, as Jang basically says "psyche" and shoots the man to drop him quickly. The other is the investigation of Seo-rae, which is first closed as a suicide, however by chance further evidence proves that she in fact did kill her husband, while also destroying key evidence seemingly having manipulated Jang to help her do this. Park is outstanding in the confrontation scene because of how bluntly he expresses he presents the feeling of betrayal. The betrayal though is wrapped not in hate but actually in a sense of love in it. Park's delivery of Jang's frustration isn't as negatively inclined as it probably should be rather he effectively shows the profound effect Seo-rae has had on him by just how lost he is in every word. Park shows a man who unfortunately is still obsessed by Seo-rae and broken for it. 

To escape it all Jang moves to a smaller city with his wife, where the relationship really is even less than it was before, though again I appreciate that Park doesn't overplay this discontent. Rather he shows this sense of resignation as she continues to make all sorts of suggestions for him and we see a man just going through the motions, and indeed perhaps dying a bit inside at every turn. Unfortunately, things only get more complicated when Seo-rae appears with a new husband and the couple meet each other at a fish market. This is low-key one of Park's best scenes because he is able to say so much really in every moment of it. This is from his subdued yet still the extremely potent reaction to seeing Seo-rae and embodies still his fascination with her, the surprise of seeing her, and the desperate frustration within himself associated with her. My favorite aspect is Park's performance as a reflection to see how he is with his wife around others. Where he is nearly a husk who just directly repeats anything she particularly would like to hear from him, without any real passion but just the slightest hint of a husbandly duty that propels him through it. Park in the moment though shows the sorry state of Jang in the moment who just is completely lost in this relationship and in this city at this point. 

Matter quickly get more complicated as Seo-rae's new husband is also found dead. Park is amazing in the scene of the investigation in being just completely fed up with her at first, and just exuding this pent-up frustration in thinking she's purposefully played him again. Where now Jang was slow peddling the suspicion towards her, Park now exuding a determined suspicion since really he does know better, despite his small-time new partner, who also hero-worships him, wanted to take Seo-rae at her word not knowing any better. This investigation to doesn't go the expected way, and Park is incredible in embodying the immediate switches, and the emotional swings of Jang throughout this sequence. Where his performance is outstanding is the fact that he never gets lost for a moment, nor does one moment seem too sudden to the next. As his determination changes to release his old fascination with Seo-rae again, as she insists there was genuine feeling between them. Park's reaction in the scene is great because he doesn't show himself going to their old state, even when kissing her, in that he is almost in this state of arrested emotional development in being just wholly lost on how exactly to react as his eyes denote the feelings for her are unquestionably strong yet still is the state of frustration over the past betrayal. 

Jang through this still trying to investigate properly, where he finds Seo-rae didn't kill her husband but did kill someone else to lead to her husband's death. In each revelation Park now shows the building towards the climax of the film, as every bit of the sheer complication of this relationship is in Park's increasingly frantic and really broken state, which only exacerbates things his wife leaves him based on her suspicions of an affair. Park shows the man as no longer able to really hold himself together through his duties as a detective, even as all of it leads to the revelation that Seo-rae is a murderer, but also did love him. Leading to a final scene of Jang desperately trying to find her, unbeknownst to him she has already set up her suicide. Park is astonishing in this scene because he shows all of it come out in this moment, and is this earned release of everything Jang has been holding out. Park now shows Jang wearing his desperation, his obsession for her, his love for her but also the tragedy of losing her in this moment. Park makes Jang this complete mess and is heartbreaking in showing the man truly just lost both in terms of finding her and completely emotionally as he searches for the woman who broke his very existence. This is a masterful performance by Park Hae-il, because he never gets lost in the narrative even when the character technically often is. He brings us so tangibly into this man's state, through every facet of his investigation but also more importantly his obsession. 

Wednesday 22 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Christopher Abbott in On the Count of Three

Christopher Abbott did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Kevin in On The Count of Three. 

On the Count of Three follows two friends as they make a suicide pact to kill each other on the count of three. 

Christopher Abbott plays one half of that duo, who after a brief scene of the two apparently about to go through with their pact, find his Kevin in a state mental hospital. If one has seen his performance in James White, this in a way seems to be in Abbott's wheelhouse which is as men on edge of a mental breakdown or perhaps experiencing it. After that opening scene, we see him converse with a counselor over having attempted to commit suicide. Abbott's performance is remarkable in just this opening as his delivery is this rush of an attempted constrained emotion. Abbott is able to realize this mental illness as an innate quality in a way that manages to be both overt and subdued, externalized and internalized. The opening conversation establishes this so well because Abbott speaks his opening lines of being alright with such a perfect attempted calm, in that there's nothing at all calm about what he is saying but the man is trying to be calm. Abbott's performance expresses this constant pull into Kevin's anguished state even at this moment as he's trying to outwardly present himself as being "okay" in the simplest of terms. Abbott matches this within his expression which is impossibly tight showing Kevin trying his hardest to hold it in, which in turn makes his obvious state of discomfort all the more abundantly clear. 
As the counselor presses him, Abbott is fantastic in just showing the sudden brutal release in his delivery which is almost as this instinctual flow filled with so much pain as he speaks to his mind in a constant state of horror. 

The film's main plot begins when Kevin's friend Val (Jerrod Carmichael) comes to visit him in the mental institute, in order to break him out so they can kill each other. Val differs from Kevin in presenting overtly as a man with a determined sense of his suicide, suicidal as just a basic state of depression, despite having much going on in his life, though having somewhat connected troubled childhood. We get here a fascinating rapport between the two as friends, and Abbott's performance changes considerably around Val. Abbott is effective at the moment in presenting in a way an innate comfort with just his friend there and instantly no longer seems as agitated as he was before. This is to the point that when Val speaks about his intention, Abbott's performance naturally segues from Kevin's own pain to being rather concerned for his friend's state. Abbott shows Kevin in a way this quiet sense of surprise and the way that Kevin is taken aback to the point he becomes less assured of his own intention to kill himself. Abbott shows really Kevin when he's been with Val, where there is some degree of comfort in the sense that he is with a friend, and pulls back on that. He also develops with Carmichael a natural chemistry between the two of them. There is this certain off-beat synergy the two do have as Abbott delivers a lot of talk around lines that are effective in the way almost that Kevin seemingly can be himself a bit around his friend and there is some sense of affection just by that comfort alone. Although darkly in this particular situation as Val convinces the two of them to kill themselves as a unit. 

The act itself goes wrong when Kevin balks at the last moment, suggesting that they enjoy the day itself before dying. Abbott is quite effective in just bringing this visceral fear of uncertainty into the act and showing that as much as the anguish is real his conviction to end it is yet to be 100%. Unfortunately for him, he has a reminder of his life quickly when an old high school bully comes by to remind him of his painful past of being bullied and then freaking out. Abbott is amazing in the scene in the way he almost folds into himself as crumples into this state of such intense anxiety as he closes off in the reminders of the verbal abuse essentially through some new verbal abuse for him to deal with. The moment he leaves the situation we see the aforementioned freakout where Abbott is great in just showing the release of anger into the wind as he shows Kevin not taking direct action against his abusers but rather just lashing out in his suffering without any real solace from the act. Rather Abbott's whole performance in a way suggests that Kevin only suffers the more he thinks about in a way.  Abbott again excels in terms of granting a very tangible sense of Kevin's history at this moment. Showing someone who just is in the constant cycle of being abused by others and that in turn only makes his already troubled mental state all that much worse. Again what is so remarkable is that even after he calms down at the moment, Abbott's manner is of someone who still isn't right within himself, as rare can he be. 

Again the bits of solace we find is just talking with Val, where Abbott speaks a mile a minute but with that, he's good at creating some sense of relief. He's also quite good at managing the darkly humorous moments the two then have as they discuss their "freedom" since they both expect to die. Both manage to deal with these lines, which cover typical non-comedic elements like racial discrimination and mass shootings, with really the right casual energy to them. They don't "sell" them nor do they undersell them rather they just come to them as two very much off-beat friends dealing with a particularly strange situation. And it completely works as again it creates the sense of the uniqueness of this friendship between the two, and whereas strange as it is Kevin at times becomes the upbeat one. Abbott makes it work though by basically showing that every interaction with Val gives him some sense of life and the two having fun together is what gives him some kind of actual life. Abbott is able to make the moment of just genuine joy, where he wants the two of them to go dirt biking, 100% of it is just actually something happy. Abbott performs it well though in just the way he presents it with a childlike sense of fun to it, suggesting that this was long an escape for Kevin in a life with few escapes. 

Eventually the more time the men spend in the day the more they spend contemplating their existence, where we do see some of what compelled Kevin to this state as he was already troubled which was further exacerbated due to being sexually preyed upon by his child psychiatrist (Henry Winkler). In these quiet moments of reflection where he considers what the doctor did to him, and in turn, considers killing him, Abbott's quiet work internalizes just so much pain that is festering in the man as this state of mental decay. There is no obvious comfort in any moment of it and Abbott presents so potently this state of suffering. Abbott is particularly effective in the moment of that petrification that almost allows the doctor to murder him instead if Val didn't step instead. Here's where I think the film falters just slightly because it rushes a bit to get to its ending, not that what we get is bad, in fact, I'd say it's good, but the film probably could've done more with it. In turn, Abbott needs to rush to a rather pivotal point in the character very quickly and I think a bit too quickly structurally. Abbott though still is terrific and is effective in showing the killing of the doctor as this state of a kind of jubilation for himself. There's a certain mania but also even a power that exudes off of him as though Kevin is reacting to finally seeing a demon of his getting wiped after believing he always had to live with them. The final scene with Kevin is the one I think just needed a little more time, though Abbott does what he can with it, I think it could've been more powerful than it is if it was just a bit more drawn out. Having said all that, along with James White, Abbott creates another striking portrait of mental illness, that isn't about reflecting in just big moments, but rather the often way it festers as a near constant. 

Tuesday 21 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Alexander Skarsgård in The Northman

Alexander Skarsgård did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Amleth in The Northman.

The Northman tells the tale of Amleth, the inspiration for Hamlet, about a Viking prince who must avenge the death of his father at the hands of his uncle. 

Alexander Skarsgård takes on the role that eventually would inspire Hamlet, though, in this version of the story, it is fair to say Skarsgård's Amleth has more in common with Maximus Decimus Meridius than most depictions of the Danish prince. I will bluntly say Skarsgård hasn't been a favorite actor of mine going into this film, not that I hated him as a performer, but more often than not I felt it was just "there" as a performer. As Amleth, under the guidance of Robert Eggers's visionary direction, this appears to be the role that was meant for Skarsgård. Partially this just is very strictly speaking physically needed for the role, that of a classical barbarian, as we are introduced to Amleth as an adult here on a wayward path as part of a Viking raiding party, Skarsgård being cut for the role quite literally. Skarsgård's physical work though is down to carb counting and protein intake, and while this is an essential facet of the character really, it isn't all there is to Skarsgård's performance. Skarsgård embodies the berzerker fully in every inch of himself as we see the sheer ferocity of his performance that does carry with this animalistic insanity as we see Amleth go about his "task" of slaughtering defenders of a village in the raid. Skarsgård becoming every inch of that force for violence that is incredibly striking all on its own. Skarsgård's presence here is absolutely tremendous in every sense, in creating this warrior of old, but also in this instance becoming a very specific screen presence that is essential for such a film. 

Often times acting in films of Northman's ilk can be less considered but in many ways, it is actually more essential than many films in terms of making the world convincing. The truth is this sort of material, even with Eggers's attention to detail and crafting such a vivid aesthetic, can fall apart instantly if the actors seem even slightly detached from the period. Northman avoids that by having a fully invested cast nearly across the board, however, Skarsgård is the focal point of it all, and thankfully for the film, he perhaps is the most invested in the material. Part of that is the aforementioned physicality but goes far beyond that. Skarsgård achieves the most essential element which is just simply being Amleth in the man who also transports us to this time. There isn't a line in his performance that never feels off despite being not only written to reflect the period but also with Amleth having to deal with really some of the most operatic notions within the piece. Skarsgård's performance doesn't wink, nor does it seem to force the style of the piece, he rather embodies and amplifies it so powerfully. Skarsgård speaks every line with an absolute conviction that speaks to the period as would a Shakespearean actor with any lines from the bard. With these lines that could be even more twisty potentially, Skarsgård makes them sing in their way, and behind them is this absolute ferocious truth within every word. Skarsgård's work does what is so remarkable it manages to embody the period as much as the aesthetic and embody the tone of the mythical legend in such a way that brings to life the grandeur of a piece but without losing any sense of essential humanity within it. 

Where there exists still the challenge yet is when Amleth is not speaking, which for the first half of the film is more often than not, Skarsgård must carry the film through silence. Skarsgård with that in mind does have a greater connection with any performer trying to lead a sword and sandal epic as the stoic lead, which is itself often handwaved but a specific challenge all its own. A challenge that Skarsgård charges head first into meeting it with every bit of determination necessary. His performance though absolutely brings you into his presence in that way, and one of the powerful examples of it, as Skarsgård face throughout this film is a fascinating kind of juxtaposition on all its own. Because in a certain sense, he is the stoic man, in which he is just compelling in that internalization. What is tremendous though is what he can do within that certain often purposeful constriction that never feels like a constriction. He tells the story of Amleth so often just through his face and does not falter within that. Take for example the raid sequence in which after his berzerker ferocity dies down, Skarsgård's eyes are distant and that of resignation as he looks upon the rest of the slaughter showing a man very much in an aimless state among the barbarians. Contrasting that with when a witch condemns the shirking of his fate, or really any of the witch or spiritual guide speaking of any ilk speaks to Amleth. As much as the other half's delivery is essential to such prophecies, it is Skarsgård's performance that grants them a connection. As in his eyes, and his reactions, he not only grants them profound tangible gravity he also personalizes them within the connection to Amleth, showing the man realizing his purpose, not as something that gives him relief but rather as this weight upon his soul. 

When Amleth finds his way to his uncle, now an exile with his family, lending himself into slavery in order to exact his revenge, Amleth takes upon different roles in turn so does Skarsgård. Skarsgård is great in presenting the guarded presence of the slavey who retires from most sight and does not seem to want to be looked upon, let alone do anything beyond what is expected of him. In that, though Skarsgård at a second's notice presents the cunning glint in the eye of Amleth. Skarsgård with as much ease conveys the sort of calculator but with a sense of the emotional connection of the man coming back to his stolen home, seeing his mother, and seeing the uncle that betrayed his family. Skarsgård doesn't simplify the emotion just because of the nature of the role seemingly as stoic, he is able to still have that stoic presence at times while bringing so much of a sense of the internalization of Amleth's struggle just underneath the most immediate surface. Skarsgård in a funny way perhaps is the bridge between what the studio probably wanted from the film and what Robert Eggers wanted, to which I honestly think the medium we found was fine by my measure. Skarsgård though achieves that by on one end being the proper expected "hero" (well Amleth technically falls under "least bad") with his commanding often quiet presence however just behind that filled with emotion and this is even through the romance we get with fellow slave/witch Olga (Anya Taylor-Joy). The latter even, Skarsgård brings the same conviction to as the romantic lead, not that this is that in a straightforward way, rather Skarsgård achieves this by in these moments with Taylor-Joy showing even this tiniest bit of relief of the man's burden albeit even for a moment. A glint of sincere affection, hope even, which speaks volumes even when lessened to even this minor degree. Again Skarsgård is the expected "hero" but achieves it not in exactly the old-school way. 

Skarsgård's performance realizes particularly potently both what you want from such a character in terms of the expectation but it also ends up being not quite the expectation as well. And no scene speaks more powerfully to this than the moment in which he goes to confront his mother (Nicole Kidman) ostensibly to offer his rescue for her from his terrible uncle. Unfortunately, rather than show her appreciation she rather reveals that she was glad that his father was killed having hated him the whole time. Skarsgård's reaction in this scene is amazing because in his eyes it is just horror or heartbreak to find out this truth, there is this fundamental break in his whole reality. The vulnerability suddenly that he reveals within Amleth at this moment is so tremendous and the sense of real disbelief at it is so profound in every second of it. His mother crushes the specific reality of his mission, and Skarsgård expresses the brutality this is upon the very concept of his life. And within this, vengeance in a way no longer is the simple quest to kill the bad guy and save the day for everyone. There is of course the dark ferocity as he goes about the remainder of his quest, which changes as he must defend the potential future of his own progeny, Skarsgård effectively playing contrasting notes between the real warmth in his moments with Olga against the sheer intensity of his violence as he goes about killing everyone associated with the old murder. There is no disconnection however as Skarsgård plays each note as truthfully as the other. And in turn, gives a more complex realization of this "hero's" journey, which again throughout hasn't been about satisfaction but rather this expectation of destiny to a degree. Take for example the final moment where the two men lay out the gauntlet for their duel, in this moment, where Amleth has killed two her swore not to, though really he had very little choice in the matter, Skarsgård's face isn't of satisfaction but rather a kind of resignation. Again though on the theme of subversion with living up to the expectation, Skarsgård delivers that in the final duel in the belly of the volcano, and I just want to highlight the great screaming acting that marks the final moment of his performance. Screaming can be pretty ridiculous on its own but  Skarsgård shows how to properly activate it here in the final moment where it appears he may die without achieving his goal. His screams begin as just the visceral pain of his wounds, however, with each scream Skarsgård conveys the man finding his strength and determination until his final one is filled with such tremendous power. A particularly brilliant bit of performance, as it is just all screams, but with each scream, Skarsgård managed to convey that final will to fulfill his destiny. Skarsgård delivers here a great performance that meets the challenge of this role. He is the stoic hero seeking revenge, but he is also so much more than that. Completely convincing us of that journey, of this world, but also enriching it with a genuine emotional depth through all of it.  

Sunday 19 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Song Kang-ho in Broker

Song Kang-ho did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning CANNES, for portraying Ha Sang-hyeon in Broker. 

Broker is a good film about the "brokers" of an abandoned child, who go with that child's mother to find a buyer while being tracked by police. On re-watch, though I would say it isn't Kore-eda's best, getting bogged down a bit by the amount of plotting he includes particularly a strangely haphazard one involving a gangster wanting the child. 

Having said that there is still plenty to appreciate about this film within Kore-eda's typical appeal about calm observation via slightly atypical circumstances. This time working with a South Korean cast, led by two well-known South Korean vets Bae Doona as the seemingly cold cop tracking the brokers, and Song Kang-ho as the lead broker. The very idea of the brokers at the core of the story seems a particularly corrupt idea, as Song's Ha along with Gang Dong-won's Dong-soo, who is also an orphan himself, collect babies abandoned at a local church and sell them on a black market. You don't instantly reject them, despite their actual job seeming a bit diabolical on the surface because of the performances of both men, though particularly Song who is his typically charming self. Song brings that innately joyful presence of his that does quickly disarm you from being too suspicious of the men, and you instantly suspect that they must have some better motivation despite how potentially horrid their chosen crime may be. Song just exudes a good man so you believe they must have a good reason and in every aspect of his performance in a way he is putting any viewer at ease because in every instance, even when destroying evidence of their crime, Song presents an affable manner seemingly of a man who isn't nefarious despite the nefarious deed he seems to be committing. 

Matters get slightly more complicated quickly when the mother of the child comes back, Moon (Lee Ji-eun), joins the two men in their slightly rough van to try to sell the child. Early on we do get an explanation for this practice where Ha explains that they would rather the child not just be left an orphan and that they do search for a genuinely loving home. Song's performance is essential in this scene because you absolutely need to believe Ha at this moment. And with Song you absolutely do, who just delivers every word with just sincerity and a kind optimism that is emphasized in every word. His expression isn't of a man hiding something more, as strange as the practice is, and as much as they are making money from the practice, Song shows that Ha is performing a real duty to help the child out in his mind. And everything Song does in the performance shows the good nature of the character. His presence might as well be described as sunshine here with the great big smile that is most often adorning his face in every given moment. Song showing consistently a man who just wants to help the situation even while doing it in a way that most would deem questionable and is in fact illegal when it comes to practical description. 

For much of the film, which is most often on this ragtag group, who are eventually joined by another young orphan just to add to this, and where Song is a great deal of just emphasizing the optimistic manner of his character. Song doesn't present him as foolish within this idea either, rather his manner with this is always as someone keenly empathetic towards those around him and keenly aware of the problems they may be facing. That is where Song does excel in creating a sense of true empathy in really the moments quite simply where Ha isn't smiling and in these moments Song does bring a real emotional depth in the sense of the character's willingness to try to understand others. I love particularly his pivotal scene with Moon where they talk about her choice to abandon her child, and while Ha asks the occasional pressing question which Song delivers with the most genuine sense of concern, his eyes at the same time show this respectful restraint within the character. It is wonderful to work in portraying this sense of the man's real honest goodness even within his profession as the reinforcing trait in Song's performance consistently throughout the film is his care and concern for others. It is simply a given and that is what it should be. 

Now Ha, despite ostensibly being one of the leads of the film probably has the least given to him in terms of backstory for the four main leads of the film. The one scene that differs from this is when we see Song visit his own daughter, where he clearly some deadbeat dad to some extent as he is promising money for his estranged wife and trying to connect with his daughter. Although I think the scene itself is implemented a little imperfectly just it feels placed in the narrative in an overly disconnected way,  Song is great in the scene. As this is a scene where Song doesn't show cheerfulness as the basic emotion in the man. Rather he is filled with a certain insecurity and where in every other moment you see his lack of hesitation to emotionally reach out there's a real power to the restraint in the power of his work at the moment by showing Ha nearly lost for words and holding back his emotions. In turn, what Song shows is Ha dealing with his real pain at the moment where in particular when his daughter quotes a dismissive remark about him, Song is heartbreaking at the moment when he thinks that is coming from his own daughter as you see in his subtle reaction just how much pain is in this. 

Speaking of disconnected scenes though, there are none more disconnected than the gangster also seeking the child, which frankly should've just been removed from the film since they feel so rushed. Sadly Song is the one involved in these scenes. This is particularly in the final scenes with the gangster where two extremely rushed and very brief scenes need to show the typically happy-go-lucky man not only not happy but going straight to murdering the gangster. An idea that I think could've worked if it was built in a more substantial way, but the whole process feels rushed and haphazard. Song is good to his credit, though the odds are stacked against him because he legitimately doesn't have enough time to really convey that determination to take such a rash act. It isn't entirely convincing, not due to Song, I think he does what he can but the writing sabotages the attempt. The same is true for his extremely brief final scene, where Song's silent expression does reveal the weight of the crime, but it is so brief, it limits the power of seeing Ha fall to this point. Again Song does what he can but I do think Kore-eda does a disservice to his performance in both scenes. And I hate in part having to leave this review as such because I don't want to be misunderstood this is a wonderful performance still. He's so great in every little naturalistic moment we get with him and the group. I have to say although the limits of the film, keep this from being one of Song's best performances, and in the scheme of the film, I will say the two female leads left the greatest impression, which was true on my initial watch but only became more abundantly clear on re-watch. 

Friday 17 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Timothée Chalamet in Bones and All

Timothée Chalamet did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Lee in Bones and All. 

Bones And All is a largely compelling, and strangely humane, film about a teenage girl Maren (Taylor Russell) struggling with her urge for cannibalism. 

Let's talk over the much fawned over Timothée Chalamet, who with many a straight-to-stardom with a rabid fan base leads to an aggressive ant-fan base, in turn, many reactions to his talent being that of just extremes, which don't effectively articulate the performer. Which means actually taking each performance on its own. Chalamet appears about 30 minutes into the film, as while I do think he is the lead, he is very definitely the secondary lead to Taylor Russell. He first appears as the second fellow cannibal she comes across via their strange smelling ability. Showing up at a grocery store where Lee takes on an obnoxious drunk, who he tricks into following him out of the store, where he eats the man. Although I wouldn't say Chalamet's charisma has always been completely obvious to me in every performance, it is extremely evident here from that first scene. As he cuts through the screen in his immediacy and really I'd say his kind of cool as he darts out at the guy, and just establishes himself with a very James Deanesque sort of presence. He's not your typical confidence, although it is still all about confidence even in a more withdrawn kind of way. 

In his first major scene, after he has eaten and Maren goes to talk to him, Chalamet really does mumble most of his lines in his rather dismissive manner towards her with each word. It works though as Chalamet manages to play it as someone who actually is a bit at ill ease at being seen at this moment though as someone who is trying to play it off like it doesn't matter to him. Finding in his kind of mumbling whispers that Lee is just trying not to engage, as it seems like they should avoid cannibals. When Maren essentially makes her intentions pretty clear, she goes along with Lee, and he takes her to his last victim's home. Chalamet is great in this scene in the sheer exuberance where he plays it kind of a kid in a candy store in the sense of fun he brings and the eagerness he is to show off to Maren the various records the guy has. Chalamet is terrific by showing very much the "fun" that Lee is able to have despite his very atypical lifestyle, and becomes much more open as well as clear in his performance as he brings Maren along into his world. 

Afterward, Chalamet with Russell find really fantastic chemistry, that isn't instantly romantic, but what they rather find is an instant connection. Chalamet's performance is wonderful in this scene by adjusting towards genuinely listening to her and creating a sense of keen empathy between the two in their conversation. As much as Chalamet brings charisma at the moment, his charm really in the conversation is just how he looks at her. Chalamet is so genuine towards her that every step of the way there is sincerity, and in that he expresses the sort of solace the two can have of mutual experience even while technically troubled by it. Chalamet though reflects it as this kind of comforting "expert" towards her, without pompousness but rather an attempt to truly make her more at ease with her condition. Not that Lee is at all a man fully comfortable with himself. The two are really lovely together and the two building the connection couldn't feel more natural despite their connection is quite unnatural. The two though bring something so essential with just how humane their relationship is in these early moments as Chalamet shows Lee just opening up to her more than anything. Their movement towards more overly romantic chemistry is so natural because it starts just with this ease and intimacy that the two build together. With just so much being in the way they look at each other that speaks, o much to an essential connection between them.

As the two speak more often, particularly on the aspect of cannibalism, is where Chalamet gives almost a proper rectification of his earlier work in Beautiful Boy that fumbled around the idea of an addict. Here though Chalamet expresses it far more pointedly, despite the addiction being for human flesh, the certain drive in Lee for the flesh, and the rush that he describes. He creates it as a sense of fixation and even more so a kind of bonding with Maren over the idea of eating. When they have a discussion Chalamet conveys this certain exhilaration through his delivery and kind of this attempt to control the idea. Within it though there is as much real desperation about the urge even as he speaks of it in this seemingly positive way. He is able to express the lure in Lee toward his addiction, but also kind of the sense of self-delusion within it. As part of the relationship with Maren, we see the connection that also becomes a dependency between the two, as Lee becomes the seasoned addict in a way. And here is where for me Chalamet particularly excelled in a way that I have often been less convinced, that being in conveying an edge with actual intensity. Chalamet is great for example when the two are found by two other eaters who wear the creep on their sleeve, and Chalamet's eyes cut right through in the way Lee immediately identifies them as a potential danger in their life. Playing so well the scene as someone who has a familiarity with the dangers of life and knows how to maneuver around it. 

The other side of this "expertise" comes as Maren tasks with Lee a meal, where she says she's "hungry" almost as if she might as well say she needs to get high. So Lee goes basically both cruising as would a homosexual would in the 80s, which Chalamet plays rather brilliantly in showing the man essentially eyeing a jerk, eyeing a man, eyeing a fix, and eyeing prey. Chalamet manages to take on the idea of a predator and is convincing as such by blending the shades of typical reality with the added strange element of cannibalism. In turn, making the cannibalism strangely tangible. A great moment just before killing the victim is actually focused on Maren doubting, and Chalamet's breaths in the scene are great acting on their own as you sense suddenly the desperate need of the addict, even in the reassuring that there's nothing wrong with what they're doing as someone truly stuck within this terrible habit. Which after the fact, where they find the man had a family, Chalamet's great in the desperation in every inch of his being in trying to make excuses for their action and his "we got to do this" filled with more anxiety than conviction. The real anxiety of someone who knows he's addicted but desperately wants to not deal with that fact.  

The other side we do see of Lee is the brief moment early on when he goes back home, where he seems to stay away on purpose other than to visit his sister on occasion. I love Chalamet's manner in these moments in that he shows Lee to the most out going and really even loving, in his way of referring to his sister in making fun of ways, however with a sense of endearment and love towards her in every ounce of that. Chalamet shows that Lee absolutely loves his sister and that is pure within his manner. At the same time though Chalamet alludes within that so much frustration and a particular vulnerability towards her when questioning what he's doing and where he's been. Chalamet shows that in these moments Lee in a way is at his worst becuase she is part of where he is the most broken based on his relationship with his "missing" dad. Chalamet manages to convey the inherent drama behind it all so potently and directly of what in so many ways defines his pain. Speaking finally on the death of his father, who he ate because he was an abusive father and also a cannibal. Chalamet is great in how he delivers this description at first with a dismissive smile as something that doesn't bother him, but the more Maren presses Chalamet reveals just how much vulnerability and pain is in him. It is an incredibly powerful moment and just a great moment from Chalamet in revealing an essential truth about Lee. The longer it goes the more Chalamet shows the emotions bubble up, and it is incredibly performed in revealing all of what Lee has been holding in this entire time. Chalamet is so great in the scene with every little smile, as a defense that only stays for a moment between just how much anguish in every tear and breath that again reveals every bit of the pain in him. And in turn, what we see Lee really getting through this moment is from it successfully in the relationship with Maren, in which the more they spend time together the more convincing Russell and Chalamet are together. They are amazing together in that scene because of showing the way together they deal with Lee's pain. They are also wonderful with after a while how pure their connection feels and tangible it is with that as the culmination of it. And through that, they've successfully shown how this connection slowly moves away from their co-dependency to love. What's also great are the little flirtatious moments that build, the moments that seem of no importance, yet show such simple sincerity of their love. They earn it so beautifully and manage to make you genuinely care about two cannibals finding love in one another. A notion that should be entirely ridiculous yet feels truly heartfelt by the end of this. And I'll admit coming into this performance I had my doubts about that notion and about Chalamet's portrayal of such a character. But, he entirely convinced me otherwise, because as much as he delivers a charismatic off-beat energy to the role, what makes his work great is how much of it is just an honest portrait of a young man suffering from addiction and a painful life. 

Wednesday 15 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Mark Rylance in The Outfit & The Phantom of the Open

Mark Rylance did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying either Leonard Burling in The Outfit or Maurice Flitcroft in The Phantom of the Open. 

The Outfit feels like an old-school British thriller you might randomly catch on a rainy Saturday, not a great one mind you, just one that is a fun enough watch. The Phantom of the Open is one of the better films of its subgenre, which is the modern period piece British feel-good film about some English eccentric. 


Mark Rylance leads both films in the types of roles I'll admit are my preference for the esteemed actor, over the stranger supporting turns in films like Don't Look Up and Bones and All, though I'll take the latter day any day between those two. These two films, in which he's centered, are my preferred Rylance speed, and together are a great showing of his particular skills as a performer. In both films the initial starting point is affability, and Rylance in both presents himself as such while also being many of seemingly no great importance. Each is a bit different, one being a working class joe in the real life Maurice Flitcroft and the other being technical that though his whole emphasis is on class as a cutter, not tailor, that being a suit maker, the finest suit maker in Chicago. The latter who we are introduced to and updated through narration throughout the film. Rylance's soft and elegant voice is particularly easy to listen to, however even in that seemingly conveying character in the very specific slight accent that seems to be hiding something from a bit of a poorer class purposefully refined. With that, the voice though spells out this method of the cutter with detail but also a noted affection within Rylance's delivery. It is clear that Burling takes great care but also joy in his work, and that is coming just from his voice alone, so it is hard not to take joy in that as well. Funny enough Flitcroft is perhaps in some ways the accent that is hidden away by Burling in some ways as Flitcroft is very much a working-class man. Rylance's accent befitting that background and something that Flitcroft would of course not hide. A very specific voice of a man very much in a specific way of life and part of a life of a family of a certain class seemingly destined to always stay within that class. Rylance even as he introduces Flitcroft with some not-amazing aspects of his life, Rylance again is endearing in this instance more innately off-beat qualities of his performance. Rylance though fashions these off-beat qualities of the man wrapped into a man who just is and manages to balance that with also a lived-in reality about him, even within the technically slightly heightened tone of "Phantom" which is purposefully presented as a bit of a fairytale. 

Each man is rather unassuming however Rylance doesn't portray either man as the same man, but what is consistent is seeing the ideal Rylance presence onscreen. That is that he is playing not really a man who purposefully commands his space in both instances, instead, he's a man who seemingly is flying under it. Rylance thinks nothing less of the characters and wishes us to feel the same way about both men. He shows there to be no shame in a man who makes a seemingly "simple" living, which of course in Burling's case doesn't seem so simple as we see just how meticulous he is in every section of creating a suit. Rylance delivers an easy going charm in his way as he interacts with his receptionist Mable (Zoey Deutch), and is genuinely such by being so pure in his manner towards her. His paternal energy really is just lovely for the simplest description, which would be fitting to this character. The same goes for Maurice who Rylance consistently shows as someone who gets simple joys and treats others with simple respects. His moment of seeing a new tv with 3 channels or hearing that his own step-son is likely to be involved with laying him off from the shipyard where they both work, Rylance's reactions are that of "oh", but in the loveliest way of "oh". When we see his relationship with his wife (Sally Hawkins) the two are tremendously lovely together as Rylance aggressive sincerity towards her as taking her as just a purest gift to himself and every smile as just the purest of love, he again just is hard not to love him a bit as a viewer. Rylance shows Maurice's approach to the world with this certain innnate curosity but also with a sense of a kind of optimism even when in pessimsism. It isn't that Rylance even shows Maurice as aggressively cheerful rather he conveys a man who very much takes it as it is. In both performances Rylance is consistent in that it is hard not to like either man as we are greeted by them into the film and enter into each story. Two very different stories, yet both mounted by a somewhat unlikely protagonist brought to life via Rylance's one of a kind presence that can be meek while also being extremely dynamic at the same time. 

Where each film goes then can be fully accepted as it's already easy enough to buy into Rylance in both leading roles. The Outfit develops into a tricky situation quickly that is purposefully extremely convoluted, but in short, gangsters want a tape that should be located in Burling's shop, which is also used as a gangster's drop. It is Burling's job to somehow get up on top of both gangsters, the chief gangster and any other gangsters that might show up, while also saving Mable at the same time, who just might be involved with the gangsters. Confused, maybe, but actually the film is relatively clear despite the twists upon twists, and helped greatly by Rylance offering a clear point to rest with throughout the story. One aspect of this is where Rylance rather brilliantly in his performance realizes a way in which someone can essentially weaponize modesty. And by that, we see how Burling can play the gangsters against each other because no one would suspect him. Rylance is amazing though in the way he keeps his soft delivery so often as he makes one suggestion or another, and builds suspicion in both men. Rylance is able to present outwardly within the scene the face of a man who couldn't be any less than pure, while with these glints of absolute genius that is the true intelligence of the man. I especially adore one moment where Rylance tells one of the men that he is in fact the "rat" they're looking for with this straight but oddly pure face that makes the gangster just laugh. Rylance at that moment made the confession unbelievable because the man just seems so gentle that he couldn't have more going on than that, disarming the gangster since you couldn't suspect him. My favorite moment though is Rylance's sure grin toward the other man afterward as he leads the man through to accepting it as a joke, yet even in that smile, there's a sense of calculation in Rylance, the calculation that Burling is using to fool the man, by playing very much the fool. A great difference though is Flitcroft who let's just say isn't the most intelligent man, unlike the very intelligent Burling, however even in that Rylance shows another method of getting through a situation, in this case, a man trying to become a pro golfer despite having no perceivable skill or experience.  Rylance though brings such purity within the naivety of Maurice as he scopes out golfing in his rather hapless way, but never not without passion. Rylance excelled though by just showing the natural lack of complication in which the man speaks of golf, such as checking professional on an application for the British open, without any real subterfuge but rather a misunderstanding. A misunderstanding that Rylance presents just as the very nature of Maurice who sees no reason to question his initial definitions.

How both films really work in large part due to Rylance's performance. In The Outfit, I wouldn't say I even accept every twist and turn, but what I do accept is the fun of watching Rylance playing the different sides of Burling in every scene. He brings you into his thought process and makes it actively engaging on how the man can work each man off each other by seeming of no importance. There isn't a moment that Rylance doesn't attach some bit of brilliance to in a reaction or just a line delivery where you see manipulation in its purest form and in such a special way. Rylance can twist himself in every scene from supporting one man to lie to another to acting completely foolish to playing along, and Rylance in its brings two sides really to every moment. One side fits whatever perspective is needed to get the job done, while always subtly alluding to the con in a certain sense to the audience making us a co-conspirator in the best way. In Phantom, Rylance does it by managing to give a completely earnest performance and a completely comedic performance that brings us along his way. Rylance offers the right off-beat energy that is most entertaining as we see Maurice go about his way in the British Open in a decidedly unique, and not overly competent way. I have a particular affection for his opening shot in the open as Rylance's expression is pure gold that is very funny as we see such jubilation while making a terrible shot, but at the same time that jubilation is sincere as Maurice very much is living his dream despite his talent. His later antics of disguises of various sorts to keep playing, despite the gold brass wanting to ban him from all professional golfing in England, Rylance again has an immediate sense of endearing fun the man still just loving it all, but also at the same time bringing the right entertaining comedy in the classical hijinks. That being Rylance's pitch-perfect reactions of fearing about trying to be found out and trying to maintain his secrecy despite not exactly being the best of it. Of course also while delivering his french when playing a fake french men terribly in the best kind of way. Although Maurice might not be dealing with deadly gangsters, Rylance's similarly brings you into the fun of this ruse as well, however really just the general misadventures of the "world's worst golfer". 

The Phantom of the Open Rylance gives a wholly fun performance as Maurice Flitcroft, making him someone you do certainly derive comedy from him being himself, but he is also just marvelous in being someone you want to see succeed in his off-beat way. He brings with the comedy just the right overabundance of heart, not at all forcing the idea of showing the value of a man just living for his passion even when he's not great at that passion. Rylance manages both and delivers here the right light touch that is just right for the material. Rylance as much as he shows the upbeat nature of Maurice, Rylance brings the right nuance in dealing with his unbelieving and dismissing stepson. Rylance shows in these moments in his reactions that there is hurt in his eyes, he just doesn't let it settle for too long, showing it is against Maurice's nature to get beaten down by it all. Rylance finds the appeal of Maurice, and even the power of him, that his constantly optimistic nature just wears away any pessimism to the point that it is hard not to see how everyone isn't won over by him by the end of it. Not his greatest turn, but it was one that brought a smile to my face most consistently. The Outfit is perhaps the greater challenge in a certain sense and it would've been very easy to get swollen whole by the ridiculousness of every little thing that he has to do as Burling. That is never the case though as even though it is darker material theoretically, Rylance brings as much ease to the part and can dance around so much that he elevates every scene with his presence. He does more than that though and manages to offer a bit more humanity to the proceedings. This is particularly in his relationship with Deutch's character, who doesn't give the most likable performance, where he shows that paternal warmth consistently that naturally segues towards paternal concern when she gets set in the sights of the gangster. He creates a deeper investment in every reaction of this ilk, but even more into the history of Burling as he begins to talk about his past. Initially, Rylance conveys that in his disarming way but eventually he reveals more, which is that he lost his wife and daughter in a fire. Rylance is heartbreaking in the scene in bringing just this blunt sense of trauma as he speaks it as something he's been living with for a long. His eyes filled with the loss but also the sense of shame with the guilt. It is hard not to feel for Rylance and in turn, you can see that, while the emotion is real, you can see the method of Burling playing on one of the gangster's care for the family. A moment like that is brought out so suddenly it could easily trip someone up, but Rylance runs with it, with such ease. And that really is every moment of this performance that in a way rides the complicated plot in a way that is truly impressive because Rylance not only doesn't get lost in it, he makes it watchable every step of the way, and makes you actually invested at a personal level by pulling us into Burling as a man. This is to the point that even as it really gets one twist too many, it is also revealed that Burling used to be a gangster, a twist I'd dislike more if Rylance didn't ace his depiction of it. Rylance doesn't lose it, instead, he earns it really just by having that edge throughout, even if that edge was in the hidden cunning of the man. Rylance earns it also at the moment as he delivers his hidden history with this immaculate calm of someone who has put it away for a long, and his emotion slowly seeps out to reveal a greater intensity in the man. Rylance recalls almost the ghost of his own self that is filled with shame, but also an internalized viciousness of the brute that Burling once was. Even while I don't think the twist is needed, Rylance makes me not mind it because it is just another odd knot in the fabric that he manages to weave with the same ease that he does every other moment. This is an amazing performance by Mark Rylance because the pressure is on him throughout the film. He needs you to believe the manipulations, he does that, he needs you to be invested in the story at an emotional level, he does that within his own work and does it all in such an unlikely way. Rylance gives a performance that absolutely dominates his film, not with a fierce voice and a grand stature, but rather a retiring manner and a pointed whisper. 
(For Phantom)
(For The Outfit)