Ben Affleck did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a SAG award for the wrong performance, for portraying Count Pierre d'Alençon in The Last Duel.
The Last Duel is a fantastic film by Ridley Scott that depicts the final officially sanctioned duel in France which resulted from the rape of Sir Jean Carrouges's (Matt Damon) wife Marguerite (Jodie Comer) by Jacques Le Gris (Adam Driver).
While the film is brilliantly presented through the three different perspectives of the principals involved with the crime, Ben Affleck isn't really part of that whole structure, because as the saying goes "once a frat bro, always a frat bro". Ben Affleck seems atypical casting for a historical piece of this ilk, though he acquitted himself well enough in his previous foray via a supporting role in Shakespeare in Love. Affleck does so again, as once more in crafting one's presence in a historical piece it often isn't about being strictly accurate to reality rather feeling natural in the film's reality. Affleck doesn't fashion an English accent, or a French accent that would be far more accurate, he takes the same technique as former all American leads in a film about French duelists, Scott's other fantastic film about duels The Duellists, of Harvey Keitel and Keith Carradine, it is rather by the reduction the stronger Americaness of his natural voice. A technique that wholly works honestly and Affleck as much as he isn't the first you'd think of for the material, he ends up fitting right into the world that Scott creates, though in his own way. Affleck after all doesn't play one of the people, or even one the knights working hard to maintain their castle and lands via war-craft, he rather is one of the few people who just gets to enjoy life being a Lord who simply waits for others to bring him money and more power.
As mentioned before Affleck is a consistency in the stories in terms of who Pierre is, however how much we see of him changes substantially. Affleck's appearances in the first recounting, which is Jean's, are brief but terrific in the passive dismissiveness of his performance towards his off-screen friend in Matt Damon. Every time Jean enters a room Affleck does this perfect near eye roll, like, "oh he's this guy again". His delivery of "closer" when Jean is pledging his loyalty is with the pitch perfect complete disregard for whatever the man may be presenting to him. In Jean's version you get one thing clear, that Pierre thinks very little of him and Affleck accentuates that wonderfully well. Affleck really takes much closer to center stage when we see Jacques's version of the tale, which where we got a straight forward story of the noble hero, an epic of old with Jean, in Jacques we get more of the modern Game of Thrones style take where there's more than little bit of debauchery required. Affleck's Pierre is right at home in this version of the tale where his role is its most substantial, and I think essential in terms of his placement in the film. Being a tale as it is, in a time as it is, it is difficult to find too much levity, thankfully Affleck provides just that by offering us a medieval frat boy for the ages.
Affleck is terrific in his first substantial scene by in a way playing the part so differently from the far more serious turns of the rest of the cast. Affleck doesn't over do it, but he has just the right amount of fun with it, fittingly as one of the few people at the time who seemingly was allowed to have fun within a horrible system. Affleck in the scene is arguing against any defense of Jean's failures as a commander to Jacques, who actually wants to defend the man, which Affleck doesn't accentuate based on seemingly any reasonable loss rather based on just how boring Jean is. Affleck is less passionate about losing land and is more so as he speaks of his low view of Jean in every regard, showing a man who the one thing he really can't stand is someone as dour as Jean. This emphasized all the more as Affleck puts as much passion into his brief moment afterwards as he questions Jacques about his shoe options, something obviously as important to Pierre as anything else might be. This moment is quickly topped as we see Pierre as the Lord at a dinner party and is a hilarious lout. Affleck so pompously speaking Latin words as this great thinker, though said with all the cunning of a lecher reading a salacious novel. This particular obsession seemingly only shared as much by Jacques, and Affleck's reactions show that Pierre's favoritism towards Jacques comes more than anything just is on his same frat bro wavelength. That of the man who likes to present himself as a great thinker, but he only greatly thinks about one thing, how to get laid.
Affleck provides the right comic relief at the right time by showing a man wholly interested in just his vices and showing the mutual companionship with Jacques that comes from just that mutual fixation. Affleck is hilarious by showing that anything other than that, is to him a bit of an inconvenience. When speaking of his business interests Affleck's delivery is rambling, mumbling, something Pierre barely likes to even talk about even when he must. I especially love his moment over overseeing his sons on some hunting expedition, with Affleck just so passively looking on and putting in the barest effort as he praises his son. Especially love his moment of hesitation and near double take when having a second thought on whether he got his second son's name right or not. A wonderful scene for Affleck is when Jacques comes to Pierre with concern that Jean is suing him over a property dispute, while Pierre is naturally in the middle of an orgy. Affleck throughout the moment is great by showing the sleaziest smile on his face as he just wants Jacques to stop moping and join in on some debauchery already. Affleck's reactions in the moment are great as though he's just barely listening and just bemused by the whole situation of the lawsuit. His reaction of it not even as inconvenience, completely summing himself up as a man who always gets what he wants. His moment of "fixing" the situation by simply giving Jacques even more power, with this phony grand gesture, as a quick fix of the man, who really just wants to get back to the sex already.
We also get a few more moments with Jean and Affleck is again delightful by being as broadly as dismissive as he can be towards Jean. What I really love though is Affleck's reaction each time is with this certain boredom and disbelief as though saying "oh look it's the bore again". Affleck's terrific by playing every moment as just barely being offended rather almost just amused by how angry and to him boring Jean is at every point. His delivery of pointing out Jean's poor strategy to build favor is with this casual manner of "you serious dude, this isn't the way to get ahead with me". Affleck's greatest scene actually though isn't overly comic, though there is kind of a humorous undertone within Affleck's own performance, where Jacques and Pierre discuss the rape charge against Jacques. Affleck is a little quieter emphasizing that even within Pierre he knows the charge is something serious and not even something he can bring his usual blitheness to. Affleck's delivery is fantastic in the scene because he is able to say it with his hesitation as though Pierre is hoping that it can be dismissed immediately as nonsense, yet there's kind of a slight unease that it won't be. When Jacques admits to it, but as something he claims is consensual, Affleck's reaction is flawless as though he's saying "dude, come on, it's me". When Jacques basically admits to it, again Affleck's reaction is great by saying it without saying it as "really dude, why?". Affleck doesn't quite make Pierre any less than despicable still, but I do love that he shows that even Pierre isn't fooled by Jacques's claims, even if he will help cover it for him. The cover up which Affleck plays as Pierre in a way at his most formal as he states the charge as a rumor and just something that should be ignored, which he believes it will be if it falls only on his authority. Unfortunately when Jean circumvents Pierre by going straight to the King for appeal, Affleck's performance is pure gold in the intensity of his anger and the perfection of his exasperated delivery of "cuuuunt" referring to Jean, showing the man's frustrations knowing that now the charge will not be going away anytime soon nor his troubles. Affleck again is limited in Marguerite's telling, though we do get him watching the final duel from the stands, where I do adore Affleck's investment in the entire affair, and especially his final reaction of "oh man, he was my dude" when things don't go his way. Despite what some organizations will tell you, which should've been defunct before they were even funct, Ben Affleck delivers a great performance here. He finds his place within the style of the film, but finds just the right variation to offer a perfect breath of fresh air within its proceedings, even if probably smells of wine...among other things.
31 comments:
Love this performance to bits and the Razzies can go fuck themselves.
The people who picked Affleck over Razzie were idiots, instead of nominating last year's Oscar winner Anthony Hopkins for the terrible The Virtuoso.
He's excellent.
Shaggy: Hopkins was fine in The Virtuoso.
Louis: could I have your thoughts on The Last Duel's screenplay and editing?
Calvin: Really?! To me he was acting in lazy mode Bruce Willis
This objectively the best performance to be nominated for a Razzie since Shelly Duvall.
I actually think his best scene is his most dramatic: Seeing Driver's desiccated corpse. He looks genuinely heartbroken.
That Razzie nomination proves that Affleck is still being perceived by people through the Gigli-tainted glasses.
That moment when I liked the Razzie lineup for Supporting Actor more than the Oscars.
Calvin:
The screenplay is excellent work from Damon, Affleck and Holofcener. Taking the novel, which details the history of the event, and turning it into something truly cinematic is no small feat on its own, but they do so much more by literally creating the third acts as the three perspectives. Again, what is great there is while the screenplay doesn't re-write each section as a completely different genre, they instead explore the different form the genre can take, making it not just taking the Rashomon idea and that's it. Instead the film re-writes each of the characters per chapter but with the sense for these variations of genre. Writing Jean as the stoic hero (as Jean would imagine himself) burdened by duty in the first as the lead of your classic period epic, as a whiny fool in the second, then finally a petulant unlikable brat hated by all in the third who just can happen to fight, however that's all he's good at it. Jacques first as the former friend turned fiend, then by his own accounts the heroic rebellious yet romantic anti-hero (as he would envision himself) as your hero of the modern revisionist period epic, then Marguerite as the dutiful perfect wife in the first, the flirtatious love interest in the second and then just a woman living in what is a terrible state for everyone but a few. As well fashioned as the two initial tales are, the third is most intriguing in being a new revision that details elements you'd never expect, both like just the day to day conversations of the women away from the men, or just having to deal with self-indulgent fools in a life that was basically just having to follow one order after another. What I think the screenplay does brilliantly there actually though is even as harsh as it is, there is a balance of trying to display a greater reality of the period, by in terms of the issues being faced, but also just hearing the voice that is usually just the dutiful wife or the love interest. Although it repeats the same scene, and all build to the same final conflict, each truly offers new meaning and new perspective in each, through changes both big and small in showing the eventual truth of the material. In turn it creates a powerful narrative, that isn't about revenge, even all the step for that are set up, but rather a woman attempting to exist in this system, that is unexpected and deeply potent work. It's an exceptional work, and the trio were sadly robbed all season.
The editing takes the concepts of the perspectives and takes them to an even greater level. I have to say it is something that gets even better on re-watches as you don't think about the differences in the first sequence, yet on re-watch you can more greatly appreciate the touches there. The editing paces the film extremely well in my mind in offering not repetition, but rather an alternate view, in replaying the right moments, and replaying them in the right way to make an impact in those changes little and large. Also notable here, and part of Scott's direction, is the editing of reaction shots here are especially essential. In every scene there is so much meaning often by just seeing one of the main character's different reactions, or even just smaller bit players add a lot. For example, a fantastic edit, is after Pierre's dinner speech we get his wife's actual reaction to him as she's walking away, or the capture of her reaction when he is refuting the charges against Jacques. The editing captures the three perspectives, but it actually captures so much more than just those three throughout, that is particularly a joy on re-watch.
Ytrewq:
I mean the Razzies should probably switch some nominees instead to "worst personal life" as that seems often their basis. I haven't seen Dangerous, and don't really intend to, but if it is anything like the nomination for his work in Expendables 3, Gibson's there for being Gibson not for giving an actual bad performance.
One of the most underappreciated films of the year.
Louis: With your Lead Actor pick now decided, how do you rank all the Oscar nominated performances for this year?
I can't say I see the same brilliance as others of you do when it comes to this performance, but I will admit that this is a frankly great performance from a frankly great film. His Razzie nomination is easily one of the worst Razzie nominations since Duvall in 1980.
The Razzies should have nominated Don Cheadle for Space Jam 2 instead.
Aidan:
1. Benedict Cumberbatch - The Power of the Dog
2. Denzel Washington - The Tragedy of Macbeth
3. Kristin Stewart - Spencer
4. Kodi Smit-McPhee - The Power of the Dog
5. Jessie Buckley - The Lost Daughter
6. Olivia Colman - The Lost Daughter
7. Ariana DeBose - West Side Story
8. Jessica Chastain - The Eyes of Tammy Faye
9. Ciaran Hinds - Belfast
10. Andrew Garfield - Tick, Tick...Boom
11. Aunjanue Ellis - King Richard
12. Penelope Cruz - Parallel Mothers
13. Troy Kotsur - CODA
14. Nicole Kidman - Being the Ricardos
15. Will Smith - King Richard
16. Judi Dench - Belfast
17. Jesse Plemons - The Power of the Dog
18. J.K. Simmons - Being the Ricardos
19. Kirsten Dunst - The Power of the Dog
20. Javier Bardem - Being the Ricardos
Maybe the razzies just thought Affleck looked funny with bleach blonde hair, therefore his performance must reflect that ridiculousness.
Either way, I've heard nothing but good things about Affleck's work here, and I'm curious how I'll respond to the rest of the film personally.
Just rewatched Terry Gilliam's Brazil. This is a movie I have never had the best history with (read my Letterboxd review if you want context), but I'm happy to say it's complete madness clicked with me. Lovely movie that has aged disturbingly well.
10/10
Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/brazil/1/
Cast ratings:
Jonathan Pryce - 5/5 (if you go to my 1985 Letterboxd list, you won't see him in my top 5 best actor line-up, but that's just because that year was so strong)
Robert De Niro - 4/5
Katherine Helmond - 3.5/5
Ian Holm - 4/5
Bob Hoskins - 3.5/5
Michael Palin - 4/5
Kim Greist - 3.5/5
Louis: your ranking of the best performances of films directed by Ridley Scott
today i finished Season 4 of Breaking Bad, which is certainly the best one yet. I found myself really loving espcially the last couple of episodes. That was the quality i expected based on ths shows reputation.
Yeah, he's pretty excellent here. "Come on in, take your pants off!"
The Academy announced their nixing eight categories from the telecast. Fuck you, David Rubin.
Fucked up decision, especially since those categories are the ones which really benefit from the spotlight and exposure (their letter said those speeches will be recorded and 'edited into' the live telecast but we all knows that means they're going to be cut down to the bare minimum and also a very clear 'fuck you, you're not as starry and important as the rest of us' deal).
Shaggy:
Ask again in the results.
Robert:
I guess Jon Bailey's leadershipx2. Why is it bad skits, overly long presenter intros and pointless montages are never on the chopping the block?
Watch when they give a goddamn spotlight to that stupid Cinderella movie after that wins the Twitter poll.
Robert: The Academy being fucking stupid.
Then. Now. Forever.
The moment where Affleck shouts “Recalculate!” and smashes the abacus is the hardest my mom and I have laughed together in a theater in some time.
Tim: Thoughts on Espositio? I thought Season 4 had his best moments on the show.
Also, with the academy's recent decision...it's braindead moves like that which contribute to it's ever decreasing viewer count.
Mitchell:
A character type that is nothing revolutionary, but still already sounds impressive when just desribed, i already liked him in 3 a lot, where he managed to change from professional to stonecold with seemingly just a tilt of his head. Now, while towards the end the villain side of him took control, I still got exactly what i wanted with S4, that uncanny "it's strictly business" type that is absolutely inscrutable in some scenes, but also a hint more personal backstory done in the two pool scenes, in which he absolutely delivers.
to the Academy:
you guys high? you tried that already in '19 and had to abort the mission after a (more than deserved) backlash. Now pumping that number up by 100% is supposed to be better?
If i were nominated, or honestly just a filmmaker invited, i would honestly not attend the ceremony, and be very vocal about it!
Instead of just running your course and showing yourself as a respectable institution, you think going the most obviously desperate route possible is going to be good for your image?
Also, why is Score in there? Let me tell you, outside of the Acting, Directingn and Picture brands, Score is basically the only category casual moviegoers also show actual interest in
The Last Duel was great. Everyone was great, minus Jodie Comer, who's just a terrible actress all around and nearly sank the 3rd act. I agree that Affleck was excellent and maybe his best performance.
Post a Comment