Showing posts with label 2024 Best Supporting Actor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2024 Best Supporting Actor. Show all posts

Monday, 27 January 2025

Best Supporting Actor 2024: Results

 5. Kieran Culkin in A Real Pain - Culkin doesn't give a bad performance but it does feel like he's coasting a little too much in his wheelhouse at times and isn't nearly as charming as the film believes him to be. 

Best Scene: First meeting the group. 
4. Edward Norton in A Complete Unknown - Although I didn't fully believe his Pete Seeger mannerisms, I believed the quiet warmth he brought to the role. 

Best Scene: Seeing Woody for the last time. 
3. Jeremy Strong in The Apprentice - Broad in a way that worked in creating the prince of darkness then pulling the rug out from under you by revealing the vulnerable pathetic man beneath it all. 

Best Scene: Birthday cake. 
2. Yura Borisov in Anora - Borisov brings so much to so many little moments in creating humor but also an essential building empathy that makes a great impact by the end of the film. 

Best Scene: Staying overnight. 
1. Guy Pearce in The Brutalist - Good predictions Robert, Lucas, Bryan, Luke, Tahmeed, A, Shaggy, Jonathan & Tony. I'll admit I was looking for reasons to not love Pearce here when reviewing the performance strangely enough, but the more I wrote about the film the more I found to love in his portrayal of a depraved exploiter who can put on a bright smile but don't believe it as it covers up a snake. 

Best Scene: Story of his grandparents. 

Best Supporting Actor 2024: Guy Pearce in The Brutalist

Guy Pearce received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Harrison Lee Van Buren Sr. in The Brutalist. 

Guy Pearce has finally got his Oscar nomination, which is one of those things that is merely a ridiculous notion given his great work in films like L.A. Confidential and Memento where he should’ve easily made a given five. Regardless, we can all take a moment and appreciate that his overdo recognition has finally come due. I have to admit though as much as Pearce was receiving the “buzz” for this performance in this film, I did have certain concerns going into this film, because as much as Pearce is a great actor who has excelled in many complex roles of various personalities, I always found he struggled a bit with straight villains, so coming into this film where he was said to play the villain, I had my concerns. And I will admit my concerns were not alleviated when he entered into the first scene where László Tóth (Adrien Brody) was finishing work with his cousin in refurbishing Pearce’s rich Harrison Lee Van Buren’s office in his mansion into a reading room at the behest of Harrison’s son. Something that falls onto deaf ears as Harrison, and Pearce storm into the room/film. And Pearce is all into this scene, screaming near the top of his lungs, his face red and just pure rage in the scene as he unleashes a tirade about the men ruining everything, despite their protests and explanations, still yelling as they leave his presence. A scene that is a whole lot, and Pearce is at such an intense level at the moment I was honestly very concerned that this would be Pearce’s setting for much of the film and we would get the singular arch portrayal of a villain we’ve sometimes seen him fall into. 

Thankfully that is not the case and instead that actually feeds into the overall portrait of Pearce, which is a purposeful and brilliant creation of the old school industrialist from the top down. Everything that Pearce does on the cursory is crafting this very specific breeding to be the very best as the American expectation and very specifically of embodying the wasp culture, almost to be the ultimate wasp himself. And Pearce does pull this off, though in large part because after that first scene, and in most scenes much of what Pearce is doing is internalized and quieter, even if the overall creation is fairly broad. It’s a broadness that works in crafting very purposefully this exact type, not unlike, if he had any, the eventual offspring of Daniel Day-Lewis’s Daniel Plainview from There Will Be Blood, but where we saw the old west still part of that man, this is a man of a similar mentality though designed by a fully “civilized” America. Pearce brings the upright posture, that isn’t just up straight it is dominating his scenes by just how controlled and commanding it all is. His voice of excessive schooling and breeding a way where his accent is a man who has worked long on the accent, not Pearce however, but rather Harrison which Pearce embodies as the man who wishes to present himself as a greater breed than everyone and everything. Something that is even evident in his second scene where he seeks out Tóth, now working on basic construction, in a much calmer fashion than we had seen in his introduction. 

Pearce is able to be charming here though the presentation of even that charm is one of immense privilege, where as much as Harrison does apologize for his behavior, there’s a very curious way that Pearce delivers it that is an essential truth to the character. Pearce does apologize while it isn’t false, there’s a specific way that Pearce has this urging tone behind it as though one should recognize and accept it. Pearce is believable enough yet there’s kind of a salesman quality, befitting a successful businessman, where Pearce’s performance does make the “sale” yet it doesn’t feel entirely honest either. In the apology, where Harrison notes his dying mother as reason for his emotion, along with much praise for the atypical designs of Tóth. Pearce’s performance as much as the admiration is real he makes something not quite right in a way, as much as he’s encouraging Tóth, wanting to make sure he will see him later, and making sure that Tóth was able to take a break from this work. Pearce’s eyes as he looks at him are bright, they are filled with a glowing optimism, but it isn’t with a traditional type of warmth. It is rather the sense of opportunity, there’s an underlying quality of greed even with the smile. As much as Harrison is presenting himself as just a “big fan” of what Tóth did, and an admirer, there is nothing so simple about it within Pearce’s work. There is more of a seed there of what will be truly Harrison’s nature as we progress in the film, even though he is more than a little disarming in this scene, Pearce still brings the sense of the man who is doing it all with a less ideal purpose even if he is presenting himself as this ideal. 

Harrison ends up inviting Tóth back to his estate as an honored guest where Pearce is truly amazing throughout this sequence. Perhaps the most pivotal of all his scenes is where he recants Tóth with his own story of success, and a bit of his family history. Every line here Pearce brings so much history and insight into, although as was the case with many of the performances of this lineup, several of these elements were not fully illuminated to me until the rewatch. Pearce’s whole way of delivering the lines about Harrison’s children's mother are a distance of meaninglessness, as though the relationship had no connection with him whatsoever. Pearce puts no emphasis on those lines and clearly was a person he held no affection for though it seems to suggest more than that. That is in stark contrast to his speaking about his mother, often referring to her by her first name. Pearce brings a familiarity with her name that has an ease about it and in a way referring to is not as just a loving son, although more on that for a moment. As we get the standout moment where Harrison relates the story of how his grandparents sought money from him after seeking his success, there’s such callous disdain that Pearce brings to every word but also combined with this prideful disregard. As he continues the story which includes mocking his money wanting grandparents by giving them an unsigned check, Pearce brings such a decided sense of self-satisfaction in describing what he did as more than just revenge but as though he’s teaching them. The most disgust in his voice came when they still begged and accepted a much smaller check, and Pearce’s portrayal has such a fascinating juxtaposition between obvious cruelty though presented as though he’s making a righteous overture. Something that follows that perhaps is one of the most precise insights into the character though is just as mentions his mother one more time and that they “did things for each other”. Pearce’s familiarity in that line is not of the loving son, same with the way he speaks her first name, Pearce in just his delivery suggests perhaps the relationship with his mother alludes to Harrison’s sexual nature, which I don’t think is simple as homosexuality, rather something fundamentally twisted starting with perhaps his mother’s relations with him. A moment that became more noticeable as an essential seed to what comes later, but there’s an even clearer moment that I was surprised I didn’t notice the first time around. Which is when he asks Tóth to describe his approach to architecture, Harrison’s reply that he finds their intellectual conversations stimulating, Pearce’s delivery is genius because he tips it just enough not to fascination but to arousal.

What Pearce’s performance ends up being is the idea of don’t be confused between having use for someone and kindness for someone, as much as Harrison seems to be being friendly to Tóth in these scenes, the truth is as even at his apparent nicest moment Harrison still an exploiter at his very core. Take even the dinner scene, where Pearce’s approach again alludes to more than what is spoken, as he speaks again with pride about Tóth but the pride is weird despite being genuine. Genuine in the pride Pearce is beaming with is for Harrison's own sake in his glint in his eyes isn’t of true care or concern, but rather of a man saying “This is mine” though the thing he owns in his mind is Tóth. I love how Pearce undercuts the actual appreciation with how he says that Tóth is well known in architectural journals, something that feels like almost a stumble in his delivery, a force of not really what Harrison cares about other than that it makes it so Tóth is something he can show off.  Even when Harrison shows Tóth his Jewish lawyer friend who promises to try to help Tóth bring his wife to America, when Tóth thanks Harrison with a pat, Pearce’s expression is so smug, so filled with satisfaction that isn’t warmth, but love of his own grand deed to consider another reason he is great. It is that ownership we see even when he calls upon Tóth to build a community building as a grand memorial for his mother, where Pearce’s excitement is real, his grand delivery is that of a man who loves it all, but never does it feel selfless. The nature of the man is hidden in plain sight in Pearce’s performance but he makes a good show of making you forget it. 

But as we see past the intermission point, as the men are well into prepping the construction, Harrison becomes that much more insidious. A few years later when they bring Tóth's wife Erzsébet (Felicity Jones), there is the key moment where Harrison mocks Tóth's still thick accent as that of a shoeshine man before throwing a coin at him. Pearce’s mocking tone isn’t of some complete switch but rather just of a man who is still playing with his property, he’s just a kid who is a little tired with his toy and wants to start messing with it more than appreciating it. The moment that is more important is the non-apology when he asks for the coin back, he says the joke went too far, but Pearce’s playful fixation on the coin is that even the handing of the coin is just another way to have fun with his toy. Something that continues from Tóth to Erzsébet though less overtly. There’s still a game he’s playing as playing the “great man”. A pivotal moment is Pearce’s conversation with Erzsébet as they ride in a car where they are speaking of a potential job in the city, and he again appears to be kind by offering her a potential job while also even suggesting he’d give her a ride to commute to the city with. All seemingly great things although he also shrugs off vagrants in Grand Central Station, something we’ll hear a few times in racist or prejudiced statements, where there’s no hesitation or even acknowledgement of it in Pearce’s performance. Rather he presents a man where such beliefs are innate and he doesn’t have to try to be racist or prejudiced, he simply is. But there’s even more where when Erzsébet remarks on a reference he makes, where Pearce’s reaction again is great where there’s an overcompensation to noting that he intended for her to get the reference, with again this needless put on confidence of man wishing to be so much more and designating his “good deeds” and "high class" to others. An element realized by the moment any real challenge comes. When Harrison supports cost cutting measures, there’s no empathy in Pearce’s delivery to Brody, it is blithe and blunt as someone who truly doesn’t care. When the whole project must be put on hold due to a railroad disaster, we get one of the realities of Harrison as Pearce brings back that rage from his first scene, as he becomes nothing more than a petulance brat with his delivery of “YES I CAN” as he becomes a boy whose model set fell apart as that is all it is to him on a fundamental level. 

Leaving us not to return to Harrison for some time as he eventually decides to finish the project, where he and Tóth go to Italy to get one more piece. Throughout the sequence there is a discomfort in Pearce’s performance for much of it, showing the man out of his domain out of his command and almost a more severe suspicion to everyone and everything around him. There’s a detached distance between him and everything else as you see the man finally out of control, until he finds Tóth in a heroin induced state. A scene that I think likely will be a point of contention for many who watch the film, though for me it works, and Pearce is essential in making work. One is in that earliest conversation setting up the strange allusions to his mother, his specific fascination with Tóth but also just his whole demeanor as someone who plays with everything he has power over. The Italy scene allowing Harrison to give into his vices openly, but also with Pearce setting up that detachment switching in the moment to now the man seemingly wanting to reassert his control as rapes Tóth. Where Pearce is disturbing through the natural ease of the act he brings in Harrison and that arousal he previously contained, now reveals itself as he rapes with fascination and disgust not for him but for Tóth as an idea of the "lowly" as he finds one more way to “play” with his toy. Giving Pearce only one final scene where Erzsébet confronts Harrison for his actions against her husband, however the focus on the scene is mostly away from Pearce. Pearce’s brief reaction still is pointed in giving just the quick moment of final realization for a second before barking to set things right again though his tantrum does not result in silence this time. Pearce finally delivers his great villainous turn here, through the creation of a man who is of a specific period, but is more than that. Pearce creates a damning portrait of a man defined by his privilege to be hollow and his ability to exploit not just for wealth, but for a stolen sense of purpose in one’s life. 

Sunday, 26 January 2025

Best Supporting Actor 2024: Yura Borisov in Anora

Yura Borisov received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Igor in Anora. 

Anora follows stripper Ani (Mikey Madison) as she gets caught up in a whirlwind marriage with a client  Ivan, who is the wayward son of a Russian oligarch. 

Yura Borisov is a unique supporting actor Oscar nomination as typically the importance of such roles are more immediately obvious within the narrative, where in Anora in general it twists expectations of such a character than is the usual expectation. As quite simply the character is a thug henchmen who we are first introduced as he’s sent by Ivan’s father’s watchdog Toros (Karren Karagulian) along with another henchmen Garnick (Vache Tovmasyan) to try to get control of the situation. And the funny thing is despite having already been introduced to Borisov in a leading role in the wonderful Compartment No. 6, and even recognizing him from there, I didn’t really take any extra notice of him either when he first appeared given the tendency of non-American actors to be cast often as one note villains or just henchmen in American films, so this might’ve been just fitting into that stereotype. Regardless this is a performance that not only benefits from re-watching but is essential in a way to discover just how much Borisov is doing from the outset since there’s little reason to believe he will be important when his initial appearance literally is as Russian thug Igor. But re-watching you do see Borisov laying the groundwork for the character from his first scene where he’s riding in the car with Garnick and hearing about the situation of potentially Ivan having married Ani, creating a headache for most, and Borisov’s naturalistic laugh as the ridiculousness of the situation pretty much instantly establishes what is behind the character. 

When they initially enter the scene Borisov is low key hilarious in playing the awkwardness of the thug trying to figure out what to do in a situation where his bosses don’t know what to do in the situation either. Borisov’s performance works by not really knowing how to present himself as Borisov puts on believable enough sort of “tough guy” distance, while also having little glances in his eyes that denote an awkwardness of not being entirely sure really where to look or how to present himself entirely. You have his brief moments with Ani early on where he introduces himself as Igor. Borisov’s delivery of saying his name is comedic perfection in how rushed and really just strange he makes it sound, though in the rushing there’s a strangely sweetness about it albeit still very awkward. Unfortunately such fumbled pleasantries stop when they find out Ivan and Ani have officially eloped leading Ivan to run off like a complete fool and Ani attempts to do the same leaving Igor to try to keep her put. And again Borisov is hilarious in his very specific timing and really comedic chemistry with Madison in this scene despite the moment being of extreme conflict. As she comes at him by throwing things at him, and Borisov’s dodging then his screaming for her to stop is tilted in just the right way, where he is the thug, but there’s something very human about the way he is doing it that is genuine making it hilarious in the same way. Unfortunately his attempts at verbal subduing fail as he physically attempts to do so leading her to bite him, where Borisov’s faces are just wonderful in being convincing in the reality while in no way hiding some of the ludicrousness of the situation. 

Something that continues as he continues to also interact with Garrick and Toros, where Borisov’s comic timing is terrific in his reactions to each. First where Garrick insists he lets Ani go, despite Igor’s protests that she’ll run, leading her to letting her go and she starts to try to escape leading to Borisov’s hilarious delivery sarcastically noting the obvious leading to go back to holding Ani again. That is until Toros shows up who too questions why they are holding her in place, and you get just a great face from Borisov as he’s holding Ani with this strange sort of conviction that he will keep maintaining his guard as awkwardly as possible knowing what will happen if he lets go. Additionally, having a moment where he reveals the bite mark from Ani as a warning to Toros with a wonderful glance attached as a bit of warning. Once the four sort of combine forces to find Ivan, Borisov has a lot of little moments throughout the sequence. We get the moment where one of Ivan’s friend’s tries to menace the group with a bat, only for Borisov to suddenly bring out genuine menace as it knocks it away as though it is nothing, then takes it to unload on the candy store the friend works for. Borisov is making the most though even of just the casual way he grabs some popcorn in the broken popcorn machine he just broke, or the bit of fun he has with the bat for a moment as they are all walking to the next place Ivan might be. Borisov just adds a little bit more of business, not in a way that feels like seeking needlessly attention but in a way that adds just a bit more comedic energy and character to every moment he’s in. One of my favorite’s as such is his very struggled way of saying “bender” when trying to theorize where Ivan might be. 

What the central value of Borisov’s performance though is to allow Igor to go from henchmen who assaults, or at least batters…let’s leave the debate to Igor and Ani themselves, to seemingly the only person who cares about her in the film. What Borisov needs to do is earn this transition throughout, which he does with even just that sheepish introduction of himself to Ani and only continues as we proceed. A lot of moments of Borisov’s performance are just in the briefest reaction shots, but Borisov handles each one so beautifully. You just see in his eyes honest concern in moments, and more so a real empathy when he sees the blithe way that Ani gets treated by so many throughout. Borisov nicely builds the empathy from moment to moment and you get a greater sense of his real care in each successive scene. This is built upon though through some key conversations, which Ani initially is naturally more than a little hostile towards Igor given his previous treatment of her. Borisov brings a great energy though in his not quite naive but kind “big lug” quality. Such as when they stop to eat, and Igor is trying to understand her insult of him with a big bite of burger in his mouth that is adorable for the lack of a better description. Borisov though is also pitch perfect in his delivery of explaining that he’s not a drug dealer or anything. There’s a simple sweet honesty he brings to every word and trying to present himself as just a guy who really isn’t in any particularly special circumstances himself. 

Borisov through these small moments builds up to the big one where Igor asks in front of everyone that Ivan apologize to Ani for his behavior. Something that is earned in Borisov’s performance and would have seemed forced if not for the building empathy of his performance. Leading to two standout moments in the film where Ani, now with her marriage annulled, gets to stay one more time at Ivan’s large estate overnight with Igor staying on the couch to drive her home the next day. It’s a great scene because you get to see both with the situation now being limited, while Ani is still giving Igor the proverbial shit over his restraint of her before, they have a pitch perfect comedic chemistry. Now in the digs on Ani’s part and the defense on Igor’s, Borisov and Madison bring a warmth even in the defense and attacks, showing two people naturally connecting even in as strange of circumstances as theirs are. Leading to the final scene where Igor leaves off Ani at her house with the end of the situation in sight and her old existence back to where she was which isn't much. Borisov is terrific again not by doing a lot, but keeping it small in just accentuating any chance the care and concern within the warmth, showing him not looking at Ani as an object, or even a task, but as another human. Leading to the final moment where she begins to have sex with him, but instead just ends up breaking down in his arms, the most human in the film, not for the sex but the blunt caring tenderness in Borisov’s face as he cradles her in a genuinely comforting embrace. Borisov delivers a great performance that reveals the man behind the thug, and naturally finding the humor and essential humanity behind the “type”. 

Saturday, 25 January 2025

Best Supporting Actor 2024: Jeremy Strong in The Apprentice

Jeremy Strong received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Roy Cohn in The Apprentice. 

For me Jeremy Strong has one of the stranger trajectories as an actor in terms of my own opinion, as to not beat around the bush, I found him quite the terrible overactor for so many of his early appearances and it wasn’t until his outstanding work on Succession that I was able to see the potential. Of course I pondered if it was something with sort of expanded time frame that allowed his Succession work to grow, although to his credit he seemed to have an idea of who Kendall Roy was from the first episode something that wasn’t entirely true for a few of his fellow cast members and really the show itself. But even with that great performance under his belt I still had seen similar tendencies in his performances in a few films, though the end result was superior to his earlier cinematic work albeit imperfect. That leads us to his performance in the Apprentice following the rise of a young Donald Trump (Sebastian Stan) to power from the 70’s to the 80’s. Strong taking on the role of Roy Cohn, a role that I’ll say probably plays nicely into Strong’s weaknesses in a way, because to preface this is not a completely new Jeremy Strong by any means here, but it is a role that is more suited to the approach. Because the real Roy Cohn was a pretty ridiculous caricature to begin as a man, and take one of Strong’s choices in this role, which is his frequent head bobbing back and forth like he’s a human vulture, befitting someone who basically feasted off corpses as a power broker and lawyer in more ways than one, well that actually was a mannerism of the real Roy Cohn and looked as strange as when Strong does it. But I’ll give Strong the credit in both ways, it is a representation of the real person but even as an archer approach, I have to admit it also works. 

So from the outset of the film, Cohn, while a real person, is in a way the prince of darkness within the early scenes of the film, and the film positions him as such. And one of the great bits of impression, that becomes just part of his performance and speaks most to the nature of the character it would seem, is the completely soulless eyes that Strong manages to pull off as constant. Something that serves him well from the outset as the devil first catching sight of Trump and urging the younger hopeful someday mogul to come see him. And the achievement of the performance begins here, though how it actually realizes itself comes later, but watching the film for a second time illuminated specifically what Strong does here that is so effective. And yes Strong is very big here but again it is within a role that is suitable for the approach. As we get the dead eyes, the birdlike posture, the thick accent with a consistently callous delivery, it is all put on pretty broad, but it works as such. Strong as much as he’s a caricature, he’s a convincing caricature as a man who presents himself as such and more importantly owns that as a part of the power. An essential facet of what Strong does is within even though you could take him as a joke the power of the character feels innate and exudes off of him. As much as he might seem ridiculous, you still very much feel the calm menace of the character because Strong creates the sense of danger that exists in a man who is without shame, care and just owns his immorality. There’s a certain sale that Strong is always pitching, though only as the most confident of pitchmen, who can rattle off his “accomplishments” and his prestigious and dirty associations as second nature to him. 

The course of action for the first act of the film is Cohn taking on Trump as his titular apprentice, by helping Trump with his legal lawsuits against his father’s company. Strong is entertaining just to watch here in playing just into every bit of the cutting nature of Cohn as he shows Trump not only how to sell himself as the best but also how to go to the throat in every situation. Strong’s performance brings more than anything the shamelessness in every bit of his physical and verbal acts of his performance. Whether it is denoting his rules of basically lying, cheating and attacking all opponents no matter what, Strong brings the wisdom of a sage just filtered through the sleaziest of mentalities but with the relaxed and striking manner of someone who knows that it also works. We see him handle himself in court, which is less of a lawyer who is making the best objections or legal angles, rather just as someone who is always willing to go to the lowest common denominator at every hurdle. He brings the same approach when bringing out the dirt against someone to get his way, Strong doesn’t play these moments differently rather just accentuating another tool in his crooked box. Strong approaches these moments as Cohn as having the clearest experience as even when he makes ridiculous objections it is with the absolute precision of someone who doesn’t care and will continue to cut through no matter what. He brings the bluntness of a sledge hammer as a man and Strong’s performance has that force within it. Strong shows Cohn as a man who can proudly deliver the line “if you’re indicted you’re invited” without hesitation or reservation, rather Strong presents it with ownership. One particularly effective bit is when he encourages Trump also to go bigger, such as silently urging him on in an interview to oversell his Trump tower as the “best ever”. Strong’s movements are of the life coach guru, just twisted as a corpse like life like guru on how to sell lines. This is in fact a very funny performance, although achieving the same types of laughs he got in Succession where it is more so the lack of awareness more than anything, yet Strong pulls that off brilliantly and differently from Succession here. It is just Cohn being himself, the horrid self he is, so when he catches the bouquet at Trump’s wedding to Ivana (Maria Bakalova), and celebrates it, it’s very funny however part of it is how completely unknowing Strong shows it to be as why anyone would be offended by it is, is part why it is funny. 

And while I might’ve just enjoyed this performance about owning a caricature, I must give Strong more credit than that, particularly upon re-watch where there is an exceptional setup and payoff with his performance that works in large part due to his approach. Now to begin with there are subtle moments in the overall broad nature of the turn to begin with, such as I do love the moments where Trump throws out a particularly hard task for him, and there’s a pause in Strong’s performance where he shows quietly that even Cohn is a bit taken aback by how brazen Trump is willing to go in his own schemes. The greater impact however is within when the power dynamic between the two shifts as Trump becomes secure in his place while suddenly Cohn starts to seem the hanger on. It’s fascinating because Strong’s performance turns that guy who was so innately in command, begins to look so small and even silly as some artifact that Trump would rather be rid of, just by no longer presenting his own manner with that same power behind it. The idea combines with Cohn getting AIDS and what we have is a complete 180 shift here. Because what Strong brings from the callous villain of the first act to a truly vulnerable man. Strong does so in part by just bringing the increasing physical weakness in each scene that goes from a nagging cough to clearly a man being sucked off all his life slowly, but through that physical vulnerability he also brings emotion. When now Cohn is the one asking for favors, in this case trying to maintain housing for his secret lover, Strong’s excellent in falling apart suddenly, and becoming the fool as everything he did before indicates his power now indicates his wavering ability. Strong brings more overt emotion, and in doing so successfully shows the humanity of the character after it is too late. There is the greatness of this performance by Strong pulling the rug from Cohn by wholly flipping the power dynamic but even more so the presence of the man. It is so striking because the man that seemed so blithely in control as the caricature, now is the one seeking just a bit of help and nearly begging for it which Strong portrays with genuine desperation and suddenly an actual person. Strong makes him no longer the Prince of darkness, now he’s just a dying man asking for help. Strong pulling off quite the achievement by, I wouldn’t say make you feel bad for Cohn, but what he does do is find the tragedy even in an evil man. As Strong’s greatest scene, the one where he's the most intimate, emotional, and involved is when Trump seems to make good on their old friendship by having Cohn over to celebrate his old friend’s birthday, and even gives him a gift of expensive cufflinks. Strong’s fantastic in the moment of describing the gift to Ivana, because in his delivery he’s so small, you see the weakness of his physical state, but you also see an earnestness for once in the man as there is real just honest tenderness as speaks of the gift with such meaning behind the words as it indicates that someone loves him. Ivana however painfully reveals to Cohn that the cufflinks are fake, showing that Trump’s final show of care for his "family" is just an inconvenience for him, leaving Strong to be genuinely heartbreaking in his clearest show of emotion in the entire film as Strong's intense breakdown in seeing the meaningless of the display for him as Trump rolls out a birthday cake for him. Heartbreaking because what Strong manages to show is less that Cohn had any good in him, rather just the tragic realization in the man through this release of overwhelming emotion that his sins truly led him to be nothing more than a shallow unloved husk seeing nothing but a void waiting for him in death. Strong delivers a great performance here. Where his broad approach is one fitting for the character, however more so is utilized so well by making it part of the overall characterization where as Strong only finds the humanity in the role when it is as Cohn realizes too late what he's been lacking in his whole wasted life. 

Friday, 24 January 2025

Best Supporting Actor 2024: Edward Norton in A Complete Unknown

Edward Norton received his fourth Oscar nomination for portraying Pete Seeger in A Complete Unknown. 

Edward Norton isn’t the star of this biopic focusing on Bob Dylan (Timothee Chalamet) but he very much gets to perform in a biopic role in the then established folk singer Pete Seeger. The real Seeger having a very distinct manner to himself with this almost country preacher relaxed manner and his kind of sing songy way he would speak as almost a country twang despite being from New York. The musician was very unique to say the least, so part of Norton’s performance is bringing that sing-songy quality to his own voice that is more than a little mannered all by itself. And what Norton does is more or less what Seeger sounded like however I will say it never quite hit that happy medium for me where Norton felt entirely like this was the voice of Seeger and not Norton trying to do the voice Seeger. It isn’t that I think he does it poorly even if the attempt still felt evident to me to create the voice rather than just expressing it with a natural ease that I found completely convincing as is the case with the very best performances of the ilk. And maybe he should’ve been more of an evocation rather than trying for the exact idiosyncratic quality, but still doesn’t completely work for me. What works better though his physical manner as Seeger which is very different from what Norton became known for in his early intense performances, as he plays an adamant peace loving pacifist and Norton way of cocking back, walking slow in his particularly relaxed movement and having this easy way about him, that is where while I still saw Norton, what I did feel was a presence of someone seeking to find connection and peaceful persuasion than hate. We do get some performance scenes where Norton plays the banjo and even leads a crowd with ”Wimoweh”, which Norton performs admirably enough albeit not the focus of the film, though honestly what I like most of Norton’s performance in these moments is his minor bits of hesitation which reflect someone who knows he’s not the biggest of the stars but more often than not is happy to play along. Frequently this idea of contentment being an innate acceptance, such as when we see him at home, where he is a bit of a fuddy duddy in a certain sense, and Norton delivers earnestly with a hint of knowing of someone who knows he’s that, but also absolutely accepts that about himself. 

Part of the character of Seeger here is to be the establishment of the folk scene who helps to introduce Dylan, and often literally introduces him. In that Norton literally introduces Dylan several times throughout the film along with some other singers and Norton goes about this with proper introductory qualities…I guess. The dramatic shift, theoretically as I don't find it particularly dramatic in this film, is as Dylan wants to expand his musical repertoire beyond the confines of the folk genre. Something that Seeger ends up being an aspect of in creating the overall conflict. Although we get his first scene at the folk meeting, where potential problems with Dylan are first discussed, Seeger comes in with a mediating voice, which where Norton is best in this performance is kind of in and around the mannerisms. And once again I don’t think the mannerisms are bad, but what Norton does most successfully is accept the role of the supporting character in a way, which is through his often silent reactions in a given scene. This scene for example Seeger just cautions the folk festival committee to not be too dogmatic, and Norton’s very good in his reaction behind the line where he conveys the sense of concern for his old protege. Something however that is contrasted when he too comes to talk Dylan out of “going electric” at the climactic concert, which Norton brings a nice warmth within the undercurrent of the quietly frustrated urging as Seeger makes almost a parable out of it otherwise, suggesting the old mentor still caring even as he gets into conflict. The climax itself, which the intention of why it is the climax is a little lost on me, when Dylan’s electric turn is met with very mixed results to understate, Seeger is one of the people reacting to it going so far as trying to turn the sound down and considering cutting it off with an axe. Transitions I’m not sure make perfect sense to the Seeger we know, except that I do like how Norton again non-verbally plays the scene because even as he goes to intend to shut Dylan down his eyes evoke a sense of concern even then. I do even like the whole reaction to the axe bit, because when his wife stops him, and Seeger says okay, Norton has kind of a double take where you see the internal quick moment of realization that he’s lost his head in the moment as he nearly smiles about himself going too far. Although the film doesn’t give a proper moment to really let Seeger reconcile with Dylan, we see him watch as he drives off the next day which Norton again handles well by expressing clear admiration in the glance, but it does feel like there should’ve been a scene of acceptance or something more than what we get. 

I purposefully went out of order in this review, because within the confines of the overall film, Norton’s role ends up being more reduced as the film goes on, though he’s in the film throughout, but the best scenes of his work I do think very much are in the opening act of the film, which also happens to be the best section of the film. The section when Dylan is a complete unknown just trying to establish himself and doing so by going to visit the dying Woody Guthrie (Scoot McNairy) in the hospital. Before that we are given Seeger’s most personal story scene where we see him dealing with the courts related to his political activities, and we see Seeger brings his same quiet sensibilities to facing down Federal charges as he does anything else. A scene that I think had potential, but the fact that the film never bothers to follow up with it in any way whatsoever does cause me to question its inclusion, particularly as Seeger’s political convictions barely come up otherwise. Regardless it leads us to the best scenes in the film which are whenever we go see Guthrie, where Seeger frequently visits him and it is where both first meet Dylan together. Here’s where some of Norton’s best work is within the film largely again through his quiet reactions in the scenes. When you see him talk and look at Woody, Norton internalizes the quiet sense of grief beautifully and evokes a long friendship with the man even though that friendship is never focused upon. Norton does just through silent performance and his expressions particularly the understated joy when he sees that Woody is finding any joy in something, like when Dylan sings to them. When later he says he’ll tour the world a bit away from him, the quiet resignation in Norton’s eyes speaks to the possibility of never seeing Woody again, and you are granted that connection and history the two share. It is to the point honestly that I wish the film was about this relationship but unfortunately it is not and we don’t see Seeger check in with Woody again, which is a shame. Regardless I do like this performance, did I absolutely accept him as Seeger the person? No, but in terms of bringing a calm, tender mentor energy and crafting history that was lacking or missing on the page, I thought Norton delivered nicely. 

Thursday, 23 January 2025

Best Supporting Actor 2024: Kieran Culkin in A Real Pain

Kieran Culkin won his Oscar from his first Oscar nomination for portraying Benjamin "Benji" Kaplan in A Real Pain. 

A Real Pain tells the story of two cousins going to visit the homeland of their deceased grandmother in Poland.

Kieran Culkin recently won an Emmy for playing Roman Roy, a man who often says inappropriate things to cover up his deep rooted trauma in Succession. While Culkin here plays a man who often says inappropriate things to cover up his deep rooted trauma, but this time he's called Benji. The differences are slightly more in that Benji is decidedly poor (or perhaps just where Roman would be if he didn't have a rich father) and he's a bit less nefarious though still often caustic or creates conflict with his statements. Actor's have received praise and awards for similar roles before, and playing a similar role does not inherently mean a performance is bad or just coasting, if the actor finds a new way into a similar character or shows new range within the same type of character. I will bluntly say, I don't think Culkin does either of those things in this performance. In fact, he finds less in the role. This isn't to say he's exactly doing what he did as Roman, but it is very close. From the opening scenes where we see the uptight, responsible David (Jesse Eisenberg) contrasting against his cousin, Benji, Culkin comes in with his trademark, on or off screen, chaotic energy where he very much bounces around in his delivery that is nearly always slightly sarcastic and tends to have relaxed if not slightly random posture. We get all that, and to be fair, this is fitting enough for Benji to create the sense of a man who is eccentric, does things his own way, and very much differs from his much calmer cousin. However, except for saying less cruel things, or at least seeming to not mean them in some cases, Culkin's performance feels very much like he's hitting repeated beats without surprising variation to those beats. It feels just like Benji is a nicer Roman. Maybe unfair, but at the same time Culkin could've differentiated these performances more, but he doesn't. 

We get kind of two types of scenes within Benji acting out as he does, which the film assumes are all very endearing no matter what. This comes into play when we see him with the tour they’re seeing Poland through, which including Holocaust related sites, including the tour guide James (Will Sharpe), an older Jewish woman Marcia (Jennifer Grey), a man who went through the Rwandan genocide Elgoe (Kurt Egyiawan), there’s also a married couple but they matter less than the already other underwritten characters. The first type of scene is where Benji acts out seemingly to get everyone involved or out of their shell. Which Culkin brings an energy to, such as assigning roles at a WWII monument for each of the people, and everyone thinks is amazing because it is written as such. I must admit, I don’t find Culkin quite has the specific endearing energy the film assumes he has here, seems kind of annoying at times, so everyone absolutely loving him without question feels contrived and part of it is Culkin doesn’t entirely sell it to me, despite certainly bringing a chaotic energy to the proceedings however seems more forceful than inviting. The other are moments where he attacks our guide for seeming not showing enough respect, which Culkin is less smiley in these moments, but other than looking slightly annoyed I will say there’s a lack of depth. These moments, I assume, are to show Benji acting out due to his especially hard to cover up the real trauma he’s going through by thinking about what his deceased grandmother went through, but Culkin’s frustration feels very much on the surface. I’ll say part of the reason for this feels so evident to me is that I’ve seen Culkin convey this very type of action covering emotion in Succession, so much more successfully, with so much more intensity in his eyes, sense of anxiety in every moment reflecting someone putting up their emotional defenses. Culkin in his earlier work found variations even in this notion where you really felt the sense of history as he acts up, here Culkin tries but it feels like he’s acting up in order for the scene to have Benji acting up rather than a natural expression of his character’s inner turmoil. 

There is emotional turmoil in this performance but it feels like moments set aside for them. We open seeing him alone at the airport clearly depressed, where his expression is well performed by Culkin and convincing as such. When he talks about his grandmother we have a mini breakdown over her loss, again natural pain shown as the emotions surface in Culkin’s face. The same is true when they take the concentration camp part of their tour and it leaves Benji sobbing. The sobbing is all again very convincing as we see the man just writhing in anguish. But, unlike in Succession where those bigger emotional moments fueled other quieter or defensive moments, these moments feel isolated within the narrative and sadly I have to say within Culkin’s own performance. Because the emotion is so limited in the eccentric acting out scenes, these feel sometimes like emotions for the sake of them. The thing is each moment isn’t any kind of check point or arc within his overall work. They are moments for that moment, they don’t fuel how he is in the next few scenes or where Benji is going from there. The film wants us to believe all of this turns Benji for the better by the end when we see him thoughtful but happy in the same spot at the airport at the end of the film. Culkin portrays that expression convincingly just as he had the other, but I never felt I saw what truly created this change in the man from possibly suicidal to finding renewed life.

It all just happens and while it speaks to the weakness of the screenplay it also speaks to limitations of Culkin’s own performance that feels like autopilot more often than not. Not a bad autopilot, he’s good at the approach in a general sense but it never is especially inspired. Take the core relationship between David and Benji, where Culkin acts up a storm being eccentric while Eisenberg stays reserved most of the time. Okay, that dynamic is clear and obvious but does it feel like we truly sense the history between them? I would say not really, just get the basic gist, even when we lead to conflict it is basic notes of frustration between them, no sense of years of conflict or breaking apart or anything that truly would elevate it to feeling like we’ve come into these two at an essential crossroads. The whole grandmother element I think is fundamental in what is missing because the character is missing, yes in conception we don’t meet her, but we should meet her through Culkin’s performance, but we don’t. When Culkin talks about her, he’s sad sure, but you don’t get shades of tenderness, of guilt, of nostalgia, to really let us fundamentally feel the loss beyond a generalized sadness. Culkin isn’t bad, but much like the film, he’s aggressively fine. There’s nothing here that feels new in Culkin’s repertoire, and to be perfectly honest it feels like a lesser variation of his far greater work in Succession. In Succession Roman felt like a real person. Here while Culkin can convey real emotions, in the end Benji feels like a screenwriter’s creation only, who we’re told is charming, yet we don’t really sense that, we told he’s troubled but mostly we just see that he’s sad. Benji was clearly a role tailor made for Culkin, but maybe too much, because it all feels very safe and feeling safe makes Benji feel a little false. 

Best Supporting Actor 2024

And the Nominees Are:

Edward Norton in A Complete Unknown

Jeremy Strong in The Apprentice

Guy Pearce in The Brutalist

Kieran Culkin in A Real Pain

Yura Borisov in Anora