Showing posts with label 1977 Alternate Supporting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1977 Alternate Supporting. Show all posts

Friday, 1 November 2024

Best Actor & Best Supporting Actor 1977: James Caan in A Bridge Too Far, Harrison Ford in Star Wars, James Coburn & Maximilian Schell in Cross of Iron

James Caan did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Staff Sergeant Eddie Dohun in A Bridge Too Far. 

A Bridge Too Far follows the various exploits within Operation Market Garden, the failed wannabe final offensive against Nazi Germany. Within it there are various vignettes constructed by director Richard Attenborough, as a film that I would say is perhaps too inconsistent to be great, but is better than its original "overblown misfire" its reputation would suggest. But the inconsistency here isn't between bad and good, it's between fine and great. One such great element is in the side story of James Caan, an American soldier within the operation we see before the start of the offensive who is asked by a fellow soldier not to let him die. And from the beginning of his screen time, Caan tries to make as much use of it as he possibly can, in immediately granting the dynamic as this comforting figure to his fellow soldier not through any big action but rather through the calm in his presence. Caan plays it just right in terms of seeing the man accept the task but also has just the right sense of a kind of doubt in his eyes. Not an overt doubt in self, but rather this disbelief that he can personally ensure this safety of this one man though is willing to obviously try his best to do so. We next jump back to see Eddie as he's within the operation and we see his friend having suffered a severe injury while Eddie drives both of them in a jeep just barely avoiding German gunfire. One moment that Caan makes the most of is where he dodges a patrol by driving into the forest only for another group of German to stop in the same portion of the soldiers, even one German noticing him. Caan's reaction to the moment is just about perfect in the low key approach he makes to the soldier nonverbally of "hey man we're both human", which the soldier seems to briefly respect before Eddie makes his escape once other soldiers notice. When he arrives back at the makeshift hospital the doctor asks Eddie just to put his friend among the other corpses, and from here is where the greatness of Caan's performance truly comes out. And often is the case with Caan, he's at his very best when he challenges his presence as the macho force. That's the case here, because as much as we see him as a confident soldier, what is so powerful in this scene is the way Caan subverts this as he presses the doctor to look at his friend and even points his gun at the doctor to force the issue. Caan's amazing in his delivery because we hear the wavering and just barely holding it together as makes the threat. Caan shows the "tough guy" barely keeping it together just enough and the very real heartbreak in the man's voice just as he also brings such a fierce conviction in his eyes to force the doctor to check who is friend, who is still alive despite the injury. Caan brings this real power by combining the vulnerability of the man potentially losing a friend and failing to live up to his promise, and through the strength of the soldier who will follow through on that promise to the very best of his ability. The close of the scene is as the doctor has Eddie briefly arrested for 60 seconds before being released and commenting that he believes Eddie might've been bluffing. With Caan having one more great moment in the blunt honesty of his delivery following that showing that there was never a question in Eddie's mind that he would've killed even his own army's doctor for the sake of his friend. Although a brief performance, Caan makes a striking impact that stands as the highpoint within the film. 
Harrison Ford did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Han Solo in Star Wars. 

Re-watching Star Wars, without needless frame cluttering of CGI monstrosities and weird character slides, helped to illuminate once again how much George Lucas got right in what was his rather extreme gamble. There is so much that works about it that it is baffling in a way to compare so many of the decisions he later made as a creative, including the equivalent of if Vincent Van Gogh wanted to "improve" The Starry Night by adding sharpie drawn people randomly throughout the frame, which was against this very film. One of the keys to this success is casting, even with Leia's random English accent, where Lucas found an artful combination between gravitas, and earthiness. The gravitas delivered best by Guinness who sells every concept no matter how ridiculous it could be Guinness allows you to believe in the force and the past histories alluded to, the earnestness is really everyone because if the cast didn't portray it as though the character believed in the world nor should we, but there is also that essential earthiness where Harrison Ford is the most important cast member for. This is obvious from his first scene where he comes in as the potential pilot for Luke and Obi-wan, not as the pilot for some fantastical adventure but he might as well be a pilot for a World War 2 spy thriller quite frankly. Ford's approach is casual right from the way he's leaning, seemingly barely caring about the conversation and states his role as pilot as matter of factly as possible. Ford not giving a chance to be anything other than real, allowing you to accept the world and him, with this certain level of Steve McQueenesque cool where the cool exists through his blithe "I don't give a damn". Although sometimes misinterpreted as Ford not really caring about the acting, that is incredibly unfair and really just lacking observation of seeing what Ford does here. Because in that open he has the cool, even the confidence as Luke challenges just how good it is, but there's more particularly the way his eyes glow when Obi-wan offers a substantial payment. Ford's whole delivery though is so honest to creating a believable place as he names the trick of avoiding imperials and the price as any man would, let alone a "space man". But where Ford excels is instantly setting up really the nature of Solo the moment Luke and Obi-wan leaves as suddenly he's bursting with excitement and much more open with his partner Chewbacca, revealing a bit of his humanity actually by showing that there's a guy who just wants the cash underneath the calm cool we saw with Luke. Of course that's not all as he gets cornered by Greedo and we get Ford returning to that setting with his calm as he deals with a man ready to kill him, however there's also the smile of the swindler as he attempts to explain his previous loss of cargo. When we get to the pivotal moment, that honestly hasn't been overstated, as Han kills Greedo after being only threatened by him, where he coldly walks away merely tipping the bartender for "the mess". Ford's performance in the moment is essential as he is a genuine scoundrel in the moment, a cool one mind you, but one where the killing, even in semi-self defense is something he's comfortable with. And with just that first scene we have three different types of Solo, and Ford brings it all to life while being a singular man as Han, that despite the definite hero he will become, leaves the character distinctly grey against the obviously good Luke and Obi-wan. 

Where Luke is on the well known hero's journey, Han is on the journey of the scoundrel's redemption that honestly is more dynamic in terms of the emotions, as Luke always wants to be a hero and just finds his path to be one, Han doesn't want to be a hero early on and in fact is doing everything for the money or survival. We get glimpses of this as he rides with Obi-wan and Luke, Ford playing strength in his maneuvers with the Millennium Falcon, though with just the slight flashes of hesitation even foolishness that makes Han capable with just a hint of haplessness. Ford balances beautifully because he is cool but he's also very human by in no way being perfect. The pivotal moment on the journey is perhaps the moment of Han doubting the force, because the way Ford delivers it isn't dumb ignorance, as it might've been with a worst take, there is rather this seasoned cynicism he presents as more so a protection for himself from needing to truly believe in anything. Which results in his reluctance when they end up in the Death Star, trying to find a method of escape, with Luke suggesting they rescue Princess Leia. Something that Ford again brings a lot to even in the dismissiveness, which again he makes it as human as possible in speaking of the dangers, not emphatically but rather as the easy way through life. Only being convinced by the potential reward, something Ford plays with easy humor that tiptoes on scoundrel yet still keeps him likable by making the lighting up of his eyes so very honest. And that's the first turn because within the action is where we basically get Harison Ford the star revealing himself as he joins Luke to rescue Leia. Which is that Ford isn't just one thing ever in these scenes. He is the man of action when he leads the charge in one moment or genuinely helps Luke in the fight. He also subverts that wonderfully when running away from that charge not cowardly but rather in a very relatable moment of the sudden reaction of realizing you've bitten off more than you can chew. My favorite moment in this sense being when he tries to hold off the Imperials from coming by putting on a slightly high pitched voice and hilariously in his attempt to make an excuse particularly his just perfectly misplaced "how are you?" followed by his moment of unease realizing that wasn't probably the best ruse. He also gets to be the great romantic bickering lead when they finally meet the not all that much impressed Leia. Something where Ford just picks up such natural chemistry where he runs with the comedic frustration that plays off Fisher ideally. Through the course of the action Solo in different moments takes charge, acts slightly foolish and argues, however what Ford does is create a natural investment in the moment to convince us of Solo finding some reason to care as he progresses. This is most evident as they run from the Death Star and fight off the pursuing Tie-Fighters, where Ford is completely in the moment, invested and even joyful along with Luke as they battle together. Naturally leading to some over cockiness from Solo which Ford does so well because the way he manages to play it is completely look foolish however in a way that actually makes you like Solo more even though he's being a bit of a dolt in the moment. Same goes for the following moment where he ponders if he could ever get to Leia as a self-doubting but hopeful question in Ford's delivery, which Luke immediately shuts down. Once more Ford actually allows himself to be uncool, yet by allowing that he doesn't cancel out the other cool moments, rather he just makes Solo much more endearing. Which leads to the finale of the film which in a way Ford has to do the most in terms of a character arc out of anyone in the film, even though the focal point is more so on Luke embracing the force, I'll say what goes on with Solo has become the far more emotionally impactful element of the film for me. Where the battle with the Death Star appears to be a last ditch, if potentially fatalistic effort against the Empire, Han decides to just take off because of that. The key to making this moment work is again Ford's way of describing it as a passive grasping onto the safety of the choices he's long held, with the easy sense of really the basic reality of a man who has long chosen the cynical path because it is the safter one. Ford's delivery of "May the force be with you" to Luke says it all, as his tone manages to convey Solo's self-doubt and shame about his choice, though with the shame being found in the sincerity of phrase towards Luke as someone on the edge of caring but not quite there. Contrasting that to his line to Chewbacca a moment later where his "I know what I'm doing", lacks any sincere albeit cynical conviction, it is someone who is finally wavering on such choices. These two separate but pivotal line deliveries, along with the gradual change of Solo manner throughout earning the climactic moment, and maybe the most powerful moment of the film for me now, Solo coming back in the key moment to knock Darth Vadar and his fighters off Luke, to enable Luke to make the Death Star killing shot. I love Ford's performance at the moment because this is now Han absolutely living his best life as he's caring about something, and helping his friend at the moment. The excitement he brings isn't just the joy of the moment but the joy of someone finding something to fight for as he delivers on Solo going from the scoundrel to the hero. Ford delivers a great performance, a star making performance, that also creates a truly iconic character at the same time, but is more than that. As Ford wholly earns the transition of Solo from the self-interested man to the money maker, but also just the in-scene moments from the cool hero, to the comedic fool, he makes it all easy, while also making the whole world so much more tangible. Ford doesn't play the role as a "sci-fi" role, he plays it the man of the Earth who just happens to be in a space adventure, providing the essential grounding to the series to help make it so much more than just another adventure film and into something that changed the entirety of the American cinematic landscape. 
Maximilian Schell and James Coburn did not receive Oscar nominations for portraying Hauptmann Stransky and Feldwebel Rolf Steiner respectively in Cross of Iron. 


At the center of Cross of Iron are Maximilian Schell and James Coburn representing opposing views and natures as it comes to being German soldiers on the Russian front during the later days of World War II. Schell had a banner year in 77, where he was Oscar nominated for nomination juggernaut Julia, for his brief role as a resistance member who gives some quick bits of important info to Fonda's Lillian Hellman as she goes to see her friend in occupied Germany. While not a bad performance, an extremely limited one and a testament to the laziness of the academy as that was his most "darling" film, meanwhile Schell was far greater elsewhere. Even his performance in A Bridge Too Far is superior as well giving just the right hints of sympathy as one of the least evil high ranking German officers around, but both performances pale in comparison to his work here as the new Captain to the Russian front Captain Stransky. From Schell's first scene he makes a remarkable impression as he wears this face of glee upon his brow and speaks to the other cynical German officers Colonel Brandt and Captain Kiesel (James Mason, David Warner) who are both done with the war at this point. Schell's whole manner is of a man lacking any of that experience but is a man with a mission. When asked "why" he wanted to be transferred to the front, Schell first speaks the absolute truth of the matter where his delivery is perfect as he states emphatically that he wants "an iron cross". Schell says it with delicious intention where he can almost taste the notion, and seems almost waiting for everyone else to understand his desire for this, though this is instantly subverted as the Colonel offers a few of his own to him as he degrades the notion. Schell's brilliance is in the switch in this moment because as will be the case in his performance throughout, Schell never simplifies Stransky despite being the overt villain of the piece consistently by virtue of his performance. Schell's amazing in how he shrugs off the comment, because Schell plays it almost in the peer pressure social circle of the officers as he casually denies it as a kind of joke with not the most consistent conviction while returning to his prideful manner as though he's here to bring some kind of personal greatness to the Russian front. 

Contrasting heavily with Schell's performance is James Coburn in the lead as Corporal Steiner eventually Sergeant who is the leader of a unit, on the frontlines and living the war in its purest form. Coburn's performance here is a testament to just how much accents really matter to a performance. Coburn here kind of tries the German accent at times but mostly just is doing his normal accent but this in no way diminishes what works about his performance. The first aspect being Coburn's grizzled presence which is one of the best cinematic uses of it in this film. He just has that immediate sense of the man defined by the way and just comes across with the unique power of his experience. Coburn owns the wear to an extent and in turn is just commanding as to be expected, though commanding with the sort of reluctance that naturally combines with his command that defines the character. Coburn is utilized most effectively to be the "Man's man" type character in Steiner who is constantly working hard on the battlefield but the power of this performance exists beyond that. In fact the power of his work is particularly the opposite of it, as such as early on where Steiner and Stransky first meet, where the men are coming back from a battle where they took an extremely young Russian prisoner. The scene is great work from both, as Schell states the order with a coarse conviction of expectation of a proper Nazi officer while Steiner emphatically denies the order, which Coburn delivers with a calm but powerful conviction. A great moment for Schell comes within even the cruel ordering of it as the way he brandishes the gun has this innate awkwardness to it as a man who probably hasn't fired nearly as many guns as he claims, and then just the visceral fear he portrays when a mortar goes off near him, which doesn't phase the battle hardened men, naturally emphasizes this contrasting point between the men. Now as good as Coburn is at playing the tough sergeant, the real strength of his performance is outside of that realm, even when he is with the young Russian prisoner. Coburn naturally brings this understated warmth to his performance where there is never a question that Steiner cares entirely about the safety of his men and the one thing he wants to do is ensure their survival. 

One of Schell's best scenes is within the bunker of the unit where he spots one of the officers making a homosexual gesture towards another, and even Schell's performance of spotting the act is absolutely incredible. There is this predatory smile that appears on his face but also sudden potent intrigue to something he can make use of while maybe subtextually indicating something about Stransky himself. The following interrogation one has to think Tarantino and maybe as well Christoph Waltz might've taken into consideration when constructing the character of Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds. Schell brings this same playing with tension not through overt menace but rather through playfulness. In this instance asking the two men about their knowledge of Southern France as some location for homosexual behavior. Asking with this jovial incisiveness as Schell asks as though Stransky himself is interested in a world without women as he interrogates the men, and maybe he is, but further Schell makes Stransky's methods imposing through the charismatic ease of his approach. The approach that in no way causes him to be any less menacing. As the unpredictability of it both creates menace and makes Schell absolutely fascinating to watch. Particularly as he jumps on one of the men's "agreement" with this maniacal nearly insane jubilation that he repeats and repeats each that Schell delivers with this increase of the tension, before cutting it through it with the direct and completely vicious declaration that the men would be killed for such behavior were he to become aware of it. The moment that again seems very much alike the opening scene of Basterds where Waltz executes a similar sudden switch so well realized. 

The real power of Coburn's performance as Steiner is consistently the humanity of his performance despite in simple terms, and also in terms of his natural presence, that of the military "badass". But that's not the defining factor of the performance even if it is what makes Coburn's work special, because it is the vulnerability that he brings to the role. The vulnerability isn't something that Coburn gives away easily but yet still does he feel so generous in his performance. Quite the trick to pull off but one that Coburn does with ease here. Because Coburn isn't wearing his heart on his sleeve yet never is it in doubt which doesn't seem like it should make sense but Coburn rides the line in the ideal way. We see this in an pivotal moment where Steiner lets the Russian soldier go with this quiet encouragement that seems so much more encouraging by the hard Coburn bringing this sincere gentle moment of fatherly warmth to the boy. Something that makes the moment where the poor boy gets gunned down by his own side in cross fire almost instantly play directly into Coburn's eyes in his reaction. His reaction is tremendous because the horror is internalized by Coburn in a way that while he is still most certainly pained and shocked but there is almost this glint of expectation of the moment as though he's used to it, it doesn't make it truly any less painful for him. The moment leading to an attack and a severe head injury that leaves Steiner with his brief respite in hospital. Although I would probably say these scenes are the weakest in the film, though not bad, they do reveal the constricted state of Steiner importantly as a man completely lost in the hospital, in part due to his injury, but due to being away from his men he can protect. He is not the badass in these scenes, he's just an injured man and Coburn doesn't hide presenting the quality of being wholly lost. He lets his presence lessen from the expectation and presents again an unexpected yet potent vulnerability. This makes the moment where Steiner quickly jumps at the chance to go to the front line completely believable as for better and more likely worse, the Russian front is Steiner's home. Something we see bluntly in a later moment where one of his men is going through ptsd, and the "man's man" Coburn brings such nuanced vulnerability and empathy as he says with such warmth that the man will never be alone again. It is a truly poignant, if ont beautiful moment, that is tremendous because Coburn genuinely reveals this unexpected side of himself of an actor that makes the moment that much more potent. 

The film's central conflict ends up between Stransky and Steiner though not in exactly the way you might expect. As Steiner is actually given a chance to get rid of Stransky by Brandt and Keisel early as they offer him the ability to refute Stransky's claims of heroism, to get his iron cross, and have Stransky punished. Steiner though refuses stating emphatically and even dismissively in Coburn's delivery that their conflict is a "personal matter". When Brandt and Keisel question this decision Steiner reprimands both them in a remarkable bit of performance where Coburn unleashes just a hint of the rage in Steiner as he speaks every word with such venom, noting that while the two officers are more enlightened than most they still represent the horrible regime he's stuck in. Coburn brings this specific passion, that is very much a 70's rebel moment, but stronger than many because of the intense reality of Coburn's performance and of course the fact that Steiner's words are so pointedly true. Back at the bunker near the front Stransky is very much the same though Steiner does confront him on the "why" regarding his ambition for the Iron Cross, presenting his own as a meaningless bit of metal. Schell's amazing in this moment because again he subverts the expectation of the moment however in a way that illuminates more to the "why" of Stransky even though he doesn't at all eliminate his villainy. Schell's delivery is frankly humble and even vulnerable as the Stransky from a Prussian aristocrat family admits he couldn't return home in such shame without such a medal. Schell doesn't suddenly make you care about Stransky but he potentially makes you see a greater depth to the man even if it is technically only further illustrating a flaw. 

The conflict comes to a head as the Russians make an advance which despite getting orders to the contrary Stransky does not inform Steiner of the strategic retreat. A great moment again for Schell in for a moment you see the pettiness but still a loyal soldier as Schell brings so much begrudgement as he indicates to inform Steiner, only to contrast that as he rips out the phone which Schell plays perfectly as this instinctual pettiness. Leaving Steiner on the front line with his men trying to find a way through the Russian army to get back to safety with his men intact. Which again here Coburn brings so much of that ease as you see the man of specific action at every point, I especially think he excels in the sequence where they find a group of Russian military women, where Steiner keeps focus to the point of admonishing his men for any inappropriate behavior playing his character's blunt morality as direct and just without exception. Steiner using his cunning to make it back to the German line only for his own army to shoot at his men, based on a suggested order of Stransky to another officer, a moment again that is just delightfully diabolical in the way Schell shows every bit of the intelligence of Stransky not for heroism but for duplicity as he comes up with an excuse that Schell reasons out with the right combo of logic and delicious deceit. The shooting leads to a massacre of much of his unit to which the officer says it was all Stransky and not his fault, and you have the greatest moment in Coburn's performance. Where we return to that same sense of when the poor young Russian died, where you see him haunted by the notion of the loss, maddened by it as just the senseless however as the moment continues we see a ferocity growing a ferocity that isn't of pure rage, though it is that to, but true unrelenting heartbreak as we see the loss of each man in Coburn's eyes, until he unleashes his wrath on the officer. Steiner afterwards continues his advance to find Stransky just as the Russians are advancing, and it is a fantastic scene between both men. Coburn brings this disgust but almost mixed with a tempering strange pity as instead of killing him he will instead take him to the fighting to finally get his cross. Coburn tells him where the "Iron Crosses grow" as a fool's challenge to the fool. Again Schell who is so perfectly smug in the moment if considering killing Steiner, but then allowing the challenge. Something that Schell conveys all in just his face going from one potential idea, to then allowing himself to prove himself as a soldier to Steiner Schell's face filling with unearned bravado of a man who will absolutely fight for his Iron Cross. Leading to the film's finale, which honestly works because of Schell and Coburn selling its final message even in abruptness. As we get to a point where Stransky has run out of ammo and doesn't know how to reload revealing just the non-soldier he's been the whole time. Schell is the perfect incompetent suddenly in every bit of fear and honestly as a buffoon as he handles the gun like he's never held one and even is juggling around his helmet like a total dolt. A moment that perfectly summarizes Stansky in the moment, which is contrasted perfectly by Steiner/Coburn's reaction of just bursting out laughing, his laugh being a pure moment of absolute joy at seeing just how incompetent his opponent has been and to see him barely able to even stand properly. A laugh though that goes beyond that as Coburn's laugh is a laugh at the entire hypocritical world he's existed in as a proper capper as man seeing the nonsense of it all for what it is. 

Next: 1986 Lead

Sunday, 9 November 2014

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1977: Results

5. Peter Cushing in Star Wars - Cushing gives an effectively evil performance making the most out of his very simple role.

Best Scene: Testing the Death Star.
4. Dirk Bogarde in Providence - Bogarde is good enough in his rather broad scenes as an excessively cold man, but his best scene is in portraying the warm version of the man.

Best Scene: Clive's Birthday.
3. Richard Attenborough in The Chess Players - Attenborough has a limited part but makes a strong impact as usual with his powerful screen presence.

Best Scene: Outram's introduction.
2. James Mason in Cross of Iron - Mason gives a great portrait of the quiet exasperation and sadness of a man who still fulfills his duties while having no real passion for it.

Best Scene:  Colonel Brandt sends Captain Kiesel away.
1. Dennis Hopper in The American Friend - Well this was no contest for me as Hopper just stood easily above the rest. Hopper's version of Tom Ripley is absolutely compelling, chilling and yet surprisingly moving.

Best Scene: The Train Murder.
Overall Rank:
  1. Dennis Hopper in The American Friend
  2. Maximilian Schell in Cross of Iron
  3. Harvey Keitel in The Duellists
  4. Harrison Ford in Star Wars
  5. James Mason in Cross of Iron
  6. David Warner in Cross of Iron
  7. Alec Guinness in Star Wars
  8. James Caan in A Bridge Too Far
  9. Anthony Hopkins in A Bridge Too Far
  10. Barry Miller in Saturday Night Fever
  11. Richard Attenborough in The Chess Players
  12. Anatoly Solonitsyn in The Ascent
  13. Jeroen Krabbe in Solider of Orange
  14. Robert Redford in A Bridge Too Far
  15. John Cassavetes in Opening Night
  16. David Gulpilil in The Last Wave
  17. Edward Fox in A Bridge Too Far
  18. Dirk Bogarde in Providence
  19. Gerard Blain in The American Friend
  20. Jason Robards in Julia
  21. Robert Fortier in 3 Women
  22. Tom Conti in The Duellists
  23. Sean Connery in A Bridge Too Far 
  24. Peter Cushing in Star Wars
  25. Maximilian Schell in A Bridge Too Far
  26. Fancisco Rabel in Sorcerer
  27. James Earl Jones in Star Wars
  28. James Whitmore in The Serpent's Egg
  29. Oleg Basilashvili in Office Romance
  30. Bill Macy in The Late Show
  31. Edward Fox in Soldier of Orange
  32. Amidou in Sorcerer
  33. Laurence Olivier in A Bridge Too Far
  34. Martin Shakar in Saturday Night Fever
  35. Norman Alden in I Never Promised You a Rose Garden
  36. Bob Balaban in Close Encounters of the Third Kind
  37. Klaus Lowitsch in Cross of Iron
  38. Edward Fox in The Duellists
  39. Christopher Walken in Annie Hall
  40. Dirk Bogarde in A Bridge Too Far
  41. Alun Armstrong in The Duellists
  42. Francois Trauffaut in Close Encounters of the Third Kind 
  43. Albert Finney in The Duellists 
  44. Klaus Kinski in Operation Thunderbolt
  45. Gene Hackman in A Bridge Too Far
  46. Eugene Roche in The Late Show
  47. David Warner in Providence 
  48. Michael Caine in A Bridge Too Far
  49. Vincenzo Crocitti in An Average Little Man 
  50. Hardy Kruger in A Bridge Too Far
  51. Bruno Cremer in Sorcerer
  52. Vas Bisoglio in Saturday Night Fever
  53. Romolo Valli in An Average Little Man
  54. Amjad Kahn in The Chess Players
  55. Tommy Lee Jones in Rolling Thunder
  56. Warren Oates in Sleeping Dogs
  57. Tony Roberts in Annie Hall  
  58. Vadim Glowna in Cross of Iron
  59. Victor Banerjee in The Chess Players 
  60. Roberts Blossom in Close Encounters of the Third Kind
  61. Maximilian Schell in Julia
  62. Tom Skerritt in The Turning Point
  63. Curd Jurgens in The Spy Who Loved Me 
  64. John Considine in The Late Show
  65. Strother Martin in Slap Shot
  66. Paul Benedict in The Goodbye Girl 
  67. Geoffrey Hearn in The Spy Who Loved Me
  68. Anthony Daniels in Star Wars
  69. James Earl Jones in The Exorcist II: The Heretic
  70. Ed McMahon in Fun With Dick and Jane
  71. Dick van Patten in High Anxiety 
  72. Desmond Llewelyn in The Spy Who Loved Me
  73. Denholm Elliot in A Bridge Too Far
  74. Harvey Korman in High Anxiety
  75. Lou Gossett Jr. in The Deep
  76. James Stewart in Airport '77
  77. Bernard Lee in The Spy Who Loved Me 
  78. Nicholas Ray in The American Friend
  79. Roger Fritz in Cross of Iron 
  80. Elliot Gould in A Bridge Too Far
  81. Tom Berenger in Looking For Mr. Goodbar
  82. Fritz Weaver in Black Sunday
  83. Christopher Lee in Airport '77
  84. Paul Sorvino in Oh, God!
  85. Jim Jordan in The Rescuers
  86. Michael V. Gazzo in Black Sunday
  87. Ralph Bellamy in Oh, God!
  88. Jackie Gleason in Smokey and The Bandit
  89. Richard Kiel in The Spy Who Loved Me
  90. Max von Sydow in The Exorcist II: The Heretic   
  91. Rena Santoni in I Never Promised You A Rose Garden
  92. John Vernon in A Special Day
  93. Jeff Carlson in Slap Shot
  94. Steve Hanson in Slap Shot
  95. William Atherton in Looking For Mr. Goodbar
  96. Colin Blakely in Equus
  97. Harrison Ford in Heroes
  98. Donald Pleasence in Oh, God!
  99. Mike Henry in Smokey and The Bandit
  100. Ryan O'Neal in A Bridge Too Far
  101. Mickey Rooney in Pete's Dragon
  102. Lionel Stander in New York, New York
  103. Ron Carey in High Anxiety
  104. Alan Feinstein in Looking For Mr. Goodbar
  105. James Mitchell in The Turning Point
  106. Lawrason Driscoll in Rolling Thunder
  107. Harry Andrews in Equus
  108. Lou Salerni in Sasquatch The Legend of Bigfoot
  109. Mikhail Baryshnikov in The Turning Point
  110. Richard Gere in Looking For Mr. Goodbar
Next Year: 1946 Lead

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1977: Peter Cushing in Star Wars

Peter Cushing did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Grand Moff Tarkin in Star Wars.

It is always interesting to note that in the original Star Wars the head villain actually wasn't Darth Vadar, instead it's Peter Cushing uniquely named Grand Moff Tarkin. This goes even so far in that he directly order Vadar around as he wishes, and it seems Vadar is completely subservient to him. There really is not much to Grand Moff Tarkin, he's really just a generally evil guy who does some generally evil things until he's exploded along with the Death Star. Technically he is replaced in the sequels by some other colonel Sanderses who hold decisively less sway over Vadar. They also hold less sway over the viewer as well as they are rather interchangeable for the most part, and rather quickly forgotten after being killed by Vadar. The only reason old Grand Moff Tarkin stands out, other than his odd name, is because of Peter Cushing's performance.

Peter Cushing, who perhaps is best known for dispatching Christopher Lee on more than one occasion, has such regal command perfect for this sort of role. Cushing has a rather clever method of this since he manages to be so commanding while all speaking very sufficiently, and never really even bothering to raise his voice. He frankly makes it okay that Darth Vadar is pushed around by Tarkin simply because Cushing is such an easy guy to be pushed around by. Cushing's rather interesting in that he consistently makes Tarkin seem a much more devious and intelligent foe than he really is as written. Tarkin actually constantly is quite stupid in his disregard of important information as well as far too much confidence of his precious Death Star. Nevertheless Cushing has such a cold wisdom in his delivery that Cushing makes Tarkin actually seem quite intelligent and imposing even if you already know he's going just to end up as a puff a smoke.

Cushing is always good whenever he is onscreen and I particularly like his chilling demeanor as he destroys Princess Leia's home planet even though she seemed to have given him the information that he wanted. There is just this general darkness that Cushing conveys with his expressions, and manages to personify the evil of the Empire quite well. If just being generally evil is the task of the part Cushing is more than up to it, and I do feel he brings a nice style to Tarkin who could have been extremely bland otherwise since there's not much to the character. Cushing gives a good performance and makes the most of the little he is given to do giving a bit more gravitas to the sci-fi fantasy world of Star Wars, nevertheless after watching the film once again though I can't quite say Cushing leaves that much of an impression and I would only rank him third out of the cast behind Harrison Ford and of course Alec Guinness.

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1977: Dirk Bogarde in Providence

Dirk Bogarde did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Claude Langham in Providence.

Providence tells the story of an aging writer Clive Langham (John Gielgud) with many personal demons as well as the actually story he's concocting in his head while he fails to sleep one night. The style of the story in the story never quite worked for me, although I did think the "real" scenes were fairly effective.

Dirk Bogarde's performance is a slightly tricky one to examine as the majority of his performance is very much of a particular style. He's not playing a real man but rather the Claude Langham which is created in the mind of his father Clive Langham. The character is obviously never meant to be realistic exactly so it explains Bogarde's performance. The first scene we see him in Claude is prosecuting a man (David Warner) who mercy killed another man with extreme prejudice. Bogarde's certainly good as he brings such a brutally cold intensity in his monologue against the man. Bogarde doesn't really cut back much on this after he gets out of the courtroom though as Claude is in a loveless marriage where his wife (Ellen Burstyn) actively seeks another man, the man being the man he had been persecuting, and Claude does not seem to care all that much.

Bogarde only really internalizes the cold intensity of Claude and makes it a tad less aggressive. He still makes a rather forceful element of any scene he is in as Claude has no hesitations in his ridiculing others and seeming to lack any warmth whatsoever towards his wife. This is turned on its head a bit though when we see Claude mistress who is an older woman who shares the appearance of Clive's wife and Claude's mother. These scenes seem to be purposefully strange which are made even more so by Bogarde's performance. He's technically a little less icy I suppose but still cold. This is obviously the point though as Gielgud's narration jokes about the way Claude let's his affections be known which are in his typical structured fashion. Bogarde's certainly continues to his serve his purpose accordingly though, even if it all a perhaps a little too much.

Bogarde fully exonerates himself though as he let's the purpose of his performance in the majority of the film by relatively brief finale of the film. The finale depicts Clive's birthday in reality where he is visited by Claude and his wife who are not all like the people he depicted in his story. Bogarde takes a far more naturalistic approach in this scenes as he portrays the actual Claude. As the real Claude Bogarde turns in a rather unassuming portrayal of a man who really doesn't have any major problems in his life as he seems to love his wife, and not even mind his problematic father. Bogarde is rather effective though as he quietly suggests some sadness that Claude feels regarding his past with his father but what makes it so effective is that he only allows it to be a glimpse. Bogarde in handling this way shows that Claude really is not haunted or even deeply troubled by it rather it is a sad memory.

Well this is certainly an interesting display of Bogarde's talents as he gets to go quite broad than rather subtle in portraying the fake and the real Claude. He's certainly good in both sections, but a problem arises which is my problem with the film as a whole. I never found the story section of the film to be all that compelling, funny or even very moving, after awhile they became a little repetitive. I felt the best moments of the film were any scene involving Gielgud which were basically any moment that wasn't truly part of the story section.  I will give Bogarde credit in that I do think he makes a go of the story sequences better than any of the other actors, and I did feel he the best part of those scenes besides Gielgud's narration. Bogarde's performance does not fully break free from the shortcomings of these scenes though and I still feel his most effective scene is as the real Claude.

Saturday, 8 November 2014

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1977: Dennis Hopper in The American Friend

Dennis Hopper did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Tom Ripley in The American Friend.

The American Friend is an effective thriller about a terminally ill picture framer Jonathan Zimmermann who is convinced to become an assassin before he dies.

Dennis Hopper plays the role of Tom Ripley who is probably best known currently from The Talented Mister Ripley where the character was played by Matt Damon. After watching Hopper's performance I probably have developed even more reservations towards Damon's performance as I feel his whole approach is flawed. Both the film's and Damon's approach of making him overtly homosexual, and his sexual urges being made a driving force behind his actions, takes away perhaps too much of the mystery out of the character. Also Damon probably just goes about a fairly obvious psychopathic creep approach to the character and makes it far too easy to read Ripley in every turn of the film. This is not that case for Dennis Hopper's take on the character, although I will admit that is partially helped by the way Ripley is cleverly implemented in the film by director Wim Wenders, since he is not the lead in the film, although I would say Hopper borders lead.

The main story follows the seemingly normal man Jonathan (well played by Bruno Ganz), and Ripley periodically comes in and out of his life. Jonathan first meets because of his job as a picture framer, and Ripley's current criminal activity selling the paintings for a painter who pretends to be deceased. Hopper doesn't play Ripley as an obvious psychopath from the beginning of the film even though he obviously stands out being an American in Europe, and seemingly trying to reinforce that fact even further by often wearing a cowboy hat. Hopper carries himself in a certain way here that is quite compelling as it becomes hard to read exactly who Ripley really is. Funny enough his earliest scenes are technically where he seems most the villain. When he first meets Jonathan, Jonathan brushes Ripley off due to Ripley only being in the art world for money. This is something so chilling about Hopper's reaction in the moment as if it is in this instance that Ripley has decided to make Jonathan his new game.

Ripley goes about doing this by telling Jonathan's illness to a man who goes to offer Jonathan the "opportunity" to become an assassin for hire. The film follows Jonathan who goes through with the killing after apparently receiving a diagnosis which appears to indicate the worst for him. During this time we get a few scenes with Ripley which are fantastic, almost silent, moments for Hopper's performance. Hopper does not portray Ripley as spending his time alone as some normal criminal mastermind, say a Hannibal Lector type, drinking wine, listening opera that sort of thing, or even killing people. Hopper is very interesting as he portrays Ripley as possible a lonely man who is perhaps trying to find his life for himself, such as when he leaves his seemingly meaningless recording to himself. There is perhaps a loneliness as Hopper portrays Ripley reflecting on his own place, and Hopper is outstanding in the way he creates Ripley as enigma while allowing us to still allow us to meet this strange man.

Eventually Ripley comes back into Jonathan's life, but not in the way you might imagine. Ripley, perhaps trying to find some place for himself, comes to Jonathan's shop in a rather friendly fashion. Hopper is great in these scenes as he doesn't let you perfectly read Ripley here. He may be there to actually improve on their initial meeting or perhaps to lead Jonathan down a path of even darker path than the one he's already on. Hopper keeps that often piercing stare and a certain oddness about Ripley that suggests the unorthodox nature of him. Hopper though brings a rather surprising warmth to the part though as he begins to speak more kindly to Jonathan and it seems as though might form an actual friendship. Hopper manages this without compromising Ripley as a character, and seems to show the warmth to come from the part of Ripley that wants to find something to attach himself. Hopper is quite effective as he slowly seems to reveal that perhaps there is some good nature to Ripley, well good nature for Ripley.

Ganz and Hopper have surprisingly great chemistry together and they are absolutely believable in their interactions. They create this casual ease of two good old friends, and it's quite fascinating that they manage to pull it off. This leads Ripley to not only suggest that Jonathan not take another assassin job but to actually come to Jonathan's rescue when he ends up doing it anyway. Jonathan's second murder is on a train and it is a virtuoso scene for Hopper. Hopper is extraordinary in this scene as he seamlessly maneuvers Ripley's constantly changing manner. In one instance he offers such a comfort with Ganz and as well a certain, oddly even disturbingly, fun as two friends play a game of sorts as they try to dispose of some bodies without getting caught. Hopper never loses the weight of the situation though and he's particularly good in the moment where Ripley murders one of the men as Hopper shows the full psychopath in the man. It's an amazing scene and one that Ganz and Hopper realize brilliantly.

Hopper's portrayal of Tom Ripley here is consistently fascinating as he makes a convincing friendship between a normal man and a psychopath with the psychopathy of the man hardly being a secret to the other man. It's not surprising that Wenders landed on the title of The American Friend as that whole aspect of the story is what makes the film so memorable. Hopper is chilling in the ways you would expect for Tom Ripley, but it is particularly intriguing that he delves into a greater detail with the man. His Ripley is a complex man and he even manages to be moving in the part. The final scene where he is abandoned by Jonathan is honestly affecting, as Hopper so tenderly portrays Hopper's sadness as Tom has lost someone that he actually connected to and cared about. This is a fantastic performance by Dennis Hopper as he is anything but a typical antagonist, which he is since he does cause Jonathan's descent into darkness, as he is strangely enough able to make Ripley almost the hero of the film as well.

Thursday, 6 November 2014

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1977: Richard Attenborough in The Chess Players

Richard Attenborough did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying General James Outram in The Chess Players.

The Chess Players is an interesting enough and enjoyable film about the comic story of two chess players as well the process that results of the Indian Kingdom that they live is about be taken over by the British.

Richard Attenborough is the one major western actor in the film as the British General in charge of dealing with Britain's involvement in India. Attenborough has about four scenes or so and often it is to state some sort of exposition that moves the plot of the British takeover a little bit more. Thankfully it's Attenborough in this role which could have been easily forgotten in a lesser actor's hands. Attenborough's considerable presence is once again on display as he instantly commands every scene he is in, in the way a General like Outram should do. Attenborough though is always so fantastic, once again here, in just providing character in the way in which he delivers his fairly simple lines as in Outram's first scene where he is asking for information on the culture of the Kingdom from one of his men.

Attenborough always lively performance style works particularly well here to keep these scenes quite engaging even with their relatively simple intents. Attenborough knows how to play the proper British type, after all he played that part to perfection in Guns of Batasi, but it does not feel though Attenborough is simply playing his character from that earlier film Major Lauderdale. General Outram is not there to push his own personal conviction rather those of the crown. Attenborough though carries himself beautifully with that right manner but in this case kinda makes it a tad less intense. Outram, for the moment, is trying to find a peaceful solution and Attenborough fittingly conveys a certain ease in this performance. This is not to say he portrays Outram as not slightly taken aback by the Indian ways as Attenborough has a gentle critical manner as Outram asks certain questions to his man to try to get a bead on the people he must deal with.

Attenborough is quite effective here as he does not portray Outram as simply wishing to brush of the Indians as quickly as possible. Attenborough does portray the right forceful and that restricted passion key for his character. There's a palatable power in the personality he gives Outram as he learns of the new developments as well as goes about trying to negotiate with either the King or even his mother. What I really like about Attenborough's performance is the subtle way he does express a slight sympathy that Outram has for the plight of the King. It is not overpowering, as he's obviously must do his job, but Attenborough is quite effective in showing in Outram's eyes that he finds no pleasure in doing his duty. I do wish the film had let Attenborough explore the character a little more, you really can never have enough Attenborough after all, or at least a conclusion scene since his performance feels cut short. Nevertheless this is fine work from Richard Attenborough as he still manages to make Outram a compelling man with just a few minor scenes.

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1977: James Mason and David Warner in Cross of Iron

James Mason did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Colonel Brandt and David Warner did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Captain Kiesel in Cross of Iron.

Cross of Iron is a rather effective war film about a German unit on the Russian front during World War II.

One of the ways Cross of Iron stands out is the ample time it devotes to the characters played by James Mason and David Warner. Technically they only have very little to do with the ongoing battle of personalities between Sgt. Rolf Steiner (James Coburn) and Captain Stransky (Maximillian Schell), and technically they could have been fairly easily written out of the film. I am glad they weren't though as their scenes are some of the best moments in the film. Mason plays the highest ranking German officer in the vicinity. Mason is no stranger to playing disillusioned Nazi officers and his role is a bit like Rommel, if Rommel had far less power, and was made even worse for wear by the war. His level of disillusionment is no match for the Colonel second Captain Kiesel played by David Warner.

Captain Kiesel's nature is made abundantly known when he basically introduced himself to the passionate Stransky by telling Strantsky that he has diarrhea. Warner instantly establishes his character as the hard drinking and hard smoking officer who spends most of his time in a daze while awaiting their inevitable defeat. Warner is terrific in the way he makes Kiesel out to be absolutely spent by this time of the war. Warner's so good in showing the physical degradation of Kiesel that it seem like you can almost smell him. Warner brings has such a lack of regard for any ceremony with his performance as there is nothing soldierly about his performance in the least. Most often Warner portrays Kiesel as a man who seems to be viewing himself at the end of his own personal world so there's no reason for any pretensions.

In almost every one of his scenes Warner's performance is a terrific personification of a true cynicism. What is so great about Warner's portrayal though is that there is not even a tremendous passion for the pessimism toward the war. Warner instead shows Kiesel as a man who barely seems to care so his cynical nature is merely part of that rather than some thing that propels him. Warner does not portray Captain Kiesel as trying to convince anyone else of his view at any moment, but rather reflects a man whose views are merely a forced part of his existence. Warner is able to tear through in each scene he is in the nonchalant despair, of sorts, that he espouses. Warner whole portrait of the officer who's basically given up on most things is just great fun to watch especially against Maximilian Schell's character who is still fervently into the war in hopes that he will earn his very own cross of iron.

Mason's performance is an interesting contrast in that Colonel Brandt probably has just as little regard for the war, but Brandt has more responsibilities than Kiesel does so he does not need to meet a few more demands. Mason is also great in portraying the state of his character who has lost all bluster, if he ever had it, by witnessing the slow demise of their already rotten "cause". Mason's also portrays a definite cynicism but he's a bit more quiet about it. Instead of letting it rule him as it does for Kiesel Mason shows Brandt to still completely do his best as an officer, but refuses to put on a false act. His reaction to hearing Stransky's desire for the cross is particularly enjoyable as Mason is so forthright in the Colonel complete disregard for the medal as he rather calmly states that the Captain can have one of his if he wants them so badly. Mason is so effective by being so natural in showing how the war has worn the passion out of Brandt.

Mason and Warner have a certain humorous quality in their scene with Schell as they both successful at giving two somehow completely different expressions of "You've got to be kidding me" with Warner more about his disregard and Mason portraying more like he's seen men like Stransky before so there's no reason to get to energetic about his dismay. Their performances go past just being an entertaining bit of two men who are done with foolish patriotism. What is so strong about both their performances is the emotionality that is still pervasive with their performances. Warner is very good in that he portrays that perhaps Kiesel is a step away from a breakdown as there is a intensity under the surface as though his disregard is his last defense mechanism against it. Mason is equally moving though in portraying just an honest sadness of a man who cares about his men deeply, but unfortunately can do little but wait for some sanity to arrive.

They both importantly show a more active side to both men in one scene where Stransky has made a claim for the Iron Cross by trying to take credit for a heroic act of a man who died in combat. To try to trap Stransky they ask Steiner for his testimony. Warner and Mason both bring a quite passion in these scenes as they show the two men finally getting a chance to do something worthwhile which is to oust the despicable Stransky. When Steiner refuses simply because he hates basically everything about the Nazis and does not care to oust Stransky using Nazi laws. Mason reaction is absolutely perfect as he basically shows a very subtle yet complete agreement in Brandt while he asks Steiner just to leave. Warner also excels in the moment in an emotional fidget of sorts as though Steiner's blunt statement has caused Kiesel a bit more pain since it directly forced him to recognize something he knows quite well himself, but tries to hide in his own way.

In their last scene Brandt recognizes that their nearing the end and decides to send Kiesel away despite his protests. Warner expresses the sudden devotion of Kiesel almost as a confusion to himself which fits his character so well. Mason carries himself with such genuine warmth though as Brandt tells Kiesel that he's one German worth saving after all. Mason keeps Brandt as a commander but suggests a underlying tenderness in the Colonel's words. In turn Warner's reaction is perfect as he shows Kiesel to be surprised but so touched by Brandt's words. It is a surprisingly heartfelt scene but Mason and Warner completely earn the moment. Both Mason and Warner make a strong impact throughout the film despite appearing in only few scenes as they realize both men in such vivid detail. As I wrote in the beginning, Kiesel and Brandt can easily be seen as superfluous characters, but that is never the case due to the incredible work from these two great actors. 

Tuesday, 4 November 2014

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1977


And the Nominees Were Not:

James Mason in Cross of Iron

David Warner in Cross of Iron

Peter Cushing in Star Wars

Dennis Hopper in The American Friend

Dirk Bogarde in Providence

Richard Attenborough in The Chess Players

For the Prediction Contest:

Mason