Javier Bardem received his fourth Oscar nomination for portraying Desi Arnaz in Being the Ricardos.
Being the Ricardos tells the story of one week in the production of the hit show "I Love Lucy", where its star Lucille Ball (Nicole Kidman) must go through a series of personal and professional troubles in that short span of a week. The film is essentially why writer and now director Aaron Sorkin should never direct what he writes. Although he is talented, he also falls into easy excesses and eccentricities. Here there was some decent idea within it, however he over-stuffs it both in terms of all the different things he tries to cover in Ball's life, but also just through his dialogue that tries so hard to be clever that it all sounds pretty dumb. That's isn't even speaking of his direction that wants to be oddly serious and overly dramatic in depicting the life of the most famous of comediennes. The film desperately needed a second voice to temper Sorkin's excesses and to get him to hone in on something, as David Fincher did with The Social Network.
Now the biggest controversy around the film was the casting of Nicole Kidman as Lucy, while Javier Bardem's casting was less focused upon, though where Kidman at least can be described in the general atmosphere of the same type, Bardem seems a stratosphere away from what I think of when I think of Desi Arnaz. Arnaz is a performer, both as a musician and a sitcom lead, was all about levity, not the first word I think of when I think of Bardem, known for his heavily dramatic or often rather malicious turns. Bardem can be charming and humorous, but it is not what is his innate presence. Unfortunately this makes for a weird choice for "Cuban Pete" himself. Where one thing Kidman does very successfully is is create a natural approximation of Lucille Ball's voice, Bardem fails miserably at this attempt. I write attempt because Bardem kind of sort of tries to do Arnaz's higher pitched voice and specific Cuban accent in some scenes, and forgets to do it altogether in most scenes. Frankly he would've been better off not attempting at all, instead he randomly "spices" some scenes up with that will only cause one to think "wait is he trying to imitate Arnaz's voice right now?". It doesn't work, and it is just step one of something that doesn't work in Bardem's performance sadly.
Again Bardem can be charming, but Bardem is charming in what is best described often in a very sexual kind of way. This isn't Desi Arnaz who is supposed to be a far more family friendly kind of charming, that someone may find sexy, but he's not being sexual innately. Well Bardem correctly doesn't try to bring that quality when trying to be the charming Desi, however what is left over is a bit of vacuum. The flashback scenes where we see Bardem portraying Desi playing the bongos or performing a light number like "Cuban Pete" is genuinely extremely awkward to witness. There appears to be almost this active discomfort in Bardem as he tries to play it "Light" which sadly results in coming off anything but. Bardem's singing isn't good, but that's not really the problem. The problem is you don't believe him as this light entertainer. He seems so constricted, so uneasy in his manner that when Ball later claims Desi would be Cuban movie star if there was such a thing, you wonder what's she's talking about. Now Bardem is most certainly a movie star, and truly can pop off the screen, when he's playing into what makes Bardem a great performer. Here though he's playing against that quality, and in turn the compelling dramatic performer is woefully inadequate at playing the easygoing musician.
The same is true in the scenes of Desi performing as Ricky in the reenactments and live recordings depicted. You'd think Desi was the worst performer in the world if you go by Bardem's portrayal, which again is absurdly out of place. He almost seems like he doesn't know how to stand in a given scene, and more than anything lacks the kind of grace that the real Desi did have when performing the show. He was an atypical sitcom lead for the time, but his presence was genuinely charming. Bardem though is kind of gangly when performing as Ricky, if not even oddly kind of creepy while trying to stand as Desi trying to be funny. There's nothing about him that suggests a guy with a comfort onscreen, and once again Bardem just seems entirely wrong for the part. He doesn't embody anything that you'd think of when thinking about Desi Arnaz. This could be okay theoretically, if he came up with some alternative presence that also worked even if in a different way. That's the case, he just seems like a guy who isn't quite sure why he's there, and is even more awkward when trying to perform as the type of entertainer that Bardem simply is not. Although to be fair, that is not the only task that is given to Bardem here, as really the focus of the sitcom scenes is more focused on everyone else, as he also needs to portray Desi as the husband and businessman.
Unfortunately we hit another snag in the form of Bardem needing to deliver Sorkin's particular dialogue, which is some of the weakest he's written for the aforementioned attempt and failure at constant wit. Bardem though in particular struggles with finding the appropriate rhythm for it. Although the awkwardness is now different from his "performance" scenes, the awkwardness remains in trying to rattle off the various witty lines Sorkin gives him. Bardem's delivery is best described as low energy and he doesn't have the sort of verve needed for the material. Yes the material isn't the best here, but even if it were better, the same sort of timing and technique would be needed, and Bardem struggles with even the attempt to sell the material as good here. There's a dourness about his performance when Desi isn't performing onscreen and he struggles with finding any kind of appropriate tone. Sorkin himself does here too, but Bardem may be the worst offender in this struggle. Honestly Bardem is all over the place in the rapid dialogue scenes and there's a strange level of uncertainty in his performance that exudes from him, an uncertainty that seems ill-fitting for Desi who is written as the boss in more ways than one. Actors often speak of the struggle it is to get down Sorkin's dialogue, and I think you see a victim of that struggle here.
I guess I'd be willing to forgive some of this if there is some aspect that Bardem finds his comfort and his place to excel with Desi. I mean we do have the film detailing the whole love affair between him and Lucy. And as much as it is shown to be this legendary thing, even if flawed, the chemistry we get between Kidman and Bardem is on the charts, near the bottom of it. They're...okay together. They aren't completely detached, but you also don't feel the needed spark between them. They're not complete strangers but you don't get the dynamic partnership the film is suggesting. So that doesn't save him for me. The last aspect he has are the dramatic scenes randomly thrown into the film where Desi refers to his early childhood when his father was arrested during a revolution and Desi obviously went through some trauma. These relatively brief scenes are where Bardem appears to be at his most comfortable. In fact it is the only time in the film where Bardem seems remotely in his element. Bardem finally calls upon his intensity in order to describe Desi's anger and despair regarding this element of his past. Of course these are so randomly implemented, and questionably written, that the only notable thing about them is that awkwardness is finally less present for Bardem albeit briefly. Far too little and far too disconnected to keep from the truth. The truth is that Javier Bardem was severely miscast here as Desi Arnaz, and throughout you see the struggle, and sadly the failure by Bardem to overcome it.
51 comments:
Just imagine, you could have avoided writing this if the acting branch got over its fear of nominating "creeps" and put in Cooper.
You know you've messed up when your performance makes Daniel Plainview this upset.
1) Wahington
2) Cumberbatch
3) Smith
4) Garfield
5) Bardem
So basically Javier Bardem has been nominated 4 times and one of them was deserved.
1. Cumberbatch
2. Washington
3. Smith
4. Garfield
5. Bardem
Jeez, I can't imagine what you'd pick for a 1 star Daniel Plainview rating.
1. Washington
2. Cumberbatch
3. Garfield
4. Smith
5. Bardem
Luke: Probably a screencap of him screaming “I’VE ABANDONED MY CHILD!”
1. Washington
2. Cumberbatch
3. Smith
4. Garfield
4. Bardem
Fuuuuck. I'm late
1. Washington
2. Cumberbatch
3. Garfield
4. Smith
5. Bardem
He was also about 15 years too old for the part - Desi Arnaz was 36 in 1953, Bardem is 52. I don’t watch many new films but I have seen Being the Ricardo. Thought it was dull and miscast. Amazed it has so many acting nominations. The Oscars are a bit of a barrel scraping exercise these days!
Even lower than I was anticipating, but as someone who hasn't seen film, I'm in no position to argue against the low rating.
It's funny...Bardem's three nominated performances before this saw him struggle in more straight forward leading parts (Before Night Falls and Biutiful), and absolutely nail an idiosyncratic supporting villain (No Country For Old Men). Perhaps this says something about Bardem's skill set, perhaps about the kind of roles he's been offered, but either way that would be "Skyfall" nod is looking pretty good right about now.
Bryan and Luke: If we came down to not 2, but miserable 1 star rating, then forget Daniel Planview- screencap of Ron Burgundy crying in a phone booth is a way to go.
A bit late, but here's my predictions:
1. Washington
2. Cumberbatch
3. Smith
4. Garfield
5. Bardem
I'm also going to my local cinema to see Drive My Car today. Incredibly excited. Haven't been so excited to see a film at the cinema since The Worst Person In The World. I predict that this may become my film of the year. I don't know if it will beat Titane and Inside, but I have a feeling it's going to be up there.
1. Washington
2. Cumberbatch
3. Smith
4. Garfield
5. Bardem
1.Washington
2.Cumberbatch
3.Smith
4.Garfield
5.Bardem
1. Cumberbatch
2. Washington
3. Smith
4. Garfield
5. Bardem
LOL thank you Louis. Love this.
Thoughts on the Nope trailer? I think it looks a lot of fun.
And for what it’s worth regarding the lead actor 5th spot, I think it’s definitely a sign of the actors’ branch being behind on times when a character study like Drive My Car nabs Picture, Director and Screenplay nods but the…actor playing the character in the middle of it all doesn’t. You’d never see that happen with a George Clooney in Descendants of Up in the Air (though I guess it happened before with Paul Giamatti), but man, seeing Nishijima left out of the 5 feels particularly egregious.
1. Cumberbatch
2. Washington
3. Smith
4. Garfield
5. Bardem
I saw Being the Ricardos after the list was revealed.
Sorkin needs to have a producer or actor/actress who has the same balls as David Fincher to say to his face the phrase: "I know what I'm fucking talking about... It announces it as a thesis. You know what I mean ?"
My winning request would be Anthony Hopkins for A Doll's House
1) Cumberbatch
2) Washington
3) Garfield
4) Smith
5) Bardem
Quite off topic, but I've just watched the trailer for this thing called Pinocchio:A True Story and well... until now I was certain that Tommy Wiseau would have been the worst voice actor if given a chance, but I had to revoke my statement 17 seconds in.
Louis: If you were still doing a complete best actor ranking, where would this performance sit among fairly recent nominees (IE 2000 onwards)? As in, what other best actor nominated turns would it be most comparable to?
1. Washington
2. Cumberbatch
3. Smith
4. Garfield
5. Bardem
Robert & Calvin:
It's a real shame as they could've resolved the fifth spot even within the best picture lineup, and without really giving much away (yes Cooper and Nishijima are more than 2's for me), would've been a far better choice. Again though you see the lack of imagination on the acting branch, because they didn't get the go ahead from precursors to recognize a bastard like the great Stanton or a non-English speaking non-established western actor in Nishjima, we get this tired work from Bardem getting recognized instead, which again while I have heard positive things about his performance the passion is muted and certainly didn't hear anyone think he was the best performance of the year by any measure.
Calvin:
Looks intriguing as per usual for Peele, as Peele's been great at 1st and second acts. Hope he pulls off a third act this time with the actual satisfying plot revelations of Get Out and the comedic sensibilities of Us.
Mitchell:
Well higher than the 1.5's (Penn, Smith in 01), and in the 2's.
On that note Louis, assume you might want to wait for the Nightmare Alley review but is Blanchett up to a 4.5 for Nightmare Alley by any chance?
Calvin:
Well that's a performance I'll be interested to see what it does for me on re-watch either way, as it is one where I'll admit personal expectation was hard to temper just knowing it was such a potent role from the 47 version and the novel.
I absolutely hated Death On The Nile. Watched it last night and it is one of the worst of the year so far
Letterboxd Review: https://boxd.it/2zLpwB
Cast Ratings:
Kenneth Branagh - 4
Armie Hammer - 2
Gal Gadot - 3
Ali Fazal - 2.5
Tom Bateman - 1.5
Letitia Wright - 2.5
Annette Bening - 2.5
Russell Brand - 3.5
Dawn French - 2.5
Rose Leslie - 2.5
Emma Mackey - 3.5
Sophie Okonedo - 3
Jennifer Saunders - 2.5
As an added bonus, i’ll give my ratings for Murder On The Orient Express (2017), which i thought was decent
Kenneth Branagh - 4
Tom Bateman - 1.5
Penelope Cruz - 3
Willem Dafoe - 3
Judi Dench - 3
Josh Gad - 3.5
Johnny Depp - 2
Derek Jacobi - 3
Leslie Odom Jr. - 2.5
Michelle Pfeiffer - 4
Daisy Ridley - 3.5
Olivia Colman - 2.5
Lucy Bonyton - 2.5
Manuel Garcia-Rulfo - 2.5
Sergei Polunin - 2
Also, i watched House Of Gucci a week and a half ago. What a complete disaster in almost every way. In my top 3 worst movies of 2021
Cast Ratings:
Lady Gaga - 4
Adam Driver - 2.5
Al Pacino - 3 (fell flat during the comedic scenes, but is solid during the dramatic scenes, even if it’s not his best work)
Jared Leto - 1 (my pick for worst supporting actor of 2021)
Jeremy Irons - 3.5
Salma Hayek - 2.5
Jack Huston - 2
By the way, has anyone seen the trailer to "Joe Vs Carole" IE the TV series about Carole Baskin?
I will say I'm curious but wary of such a show, because that whole "Tiger King" debaucle is so larger than life, and so easy to turn into parody (I mean, beyond the parody it already is).
As for the casting, I can't say I know much of John Cameron Mitchell's work, but they did a good job transforming him into Joe Exotic. For Kate McKinnon as Baskin - I'm not sure. I've never really taken to McKinnon as an actress, as I find she can be very self aware and one track in her performances. That said, if there were a role that could match her style and help her find more range, it would be Baskin.
Louis: What are your thoughts on Ball and Arnaz's performances from what you've seen of I Love Lucy?
Honestly thought everyone in Gucci was pretty good, might be rooting for it at SAG Ensemble the more I think about it honestly.
Brazinterma:
Editing:
My Nominees:
The Last Duel
Licorice Pizza
Summer of Soul
The Tragedy of Macbeth
West Side Story
Rest of the Top Ten:
6. The Worst Person in the World
7. Last Night in Soho
8. Val
9. Dune
10. The Suicide Squad
Luke:
Cinematography:
My Nominees:
Last Night in Soho
Nightmare Alley
Spencer
The Tragedy of Macbeth
West Side Story
Rest of the Top Ten:
6. Dune
7. Licorice Pizza
8. Passing
9. The French Dispatch
10. Censor
Brutal category to get even down to ten.
Marcus:
Well I haven't watched them recently, but when I used to occasionally watched the show when it showed on TV Land (or Nick at Night can't remember), I enjoyed them (even if I'll always be more of a Honeymooners man which totally holds up). It was a fun show though, and both Ball and Arnaz had a great comic ease particularly in their ability to do the screwball style loving conflict.
Louis: do you think Marielle Heller would have been a good director for Being the Ricardos, and if not who do you think would have been?
Thoughts on Val.
Lucas:
Potentially, the fact that she fired Julianne Moore from Can You Ever Forgive Me shows she's willing to make the tougher choices to get a better film. No matter what you would've needed someone to do what Fincher did with Social Network (though I think the base script was probably better there to begin with). Heller's style seems more appropriate for the material anyways as I could see her fashioning kind of a sitcoms style to the story, like how she did the episode styling for A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, rather than Sorkin's "this is a incredibly important drama" tone.
Luke:
I don't think it comes to any truly revelatory conclusions, but it does successfully tell Kilmer's story with some strong editing by doing so through the use of Kilmer's own footage.
I’m also a bit stumped as to how the top two will place. Louis is a bigger fan of Macbeth, yet Denzel isn’t the *only* great factor of the film (the rest of the cast, the direction, the production values, etc). He’s technically less positive on Power of The Dog overall, yet Smit-McPhee got a 5, and one could argue Cumberbatch even fills in a bit of blanks that the script underdevelops (his relationship with George, a scene missing with Peter, etc).
Louis: Your alternate casting choice for Desi Arnaz? I believe Oscar Isaac was being eyes in the early casting stages of the film, along with Blanchett.
Bryan:
Isaac with ease, though if you want to keep someone closer in age to Kidman (though Arnaz was younger than Ball anyways), I think Antonio Banderas doing full Mask of Zorro charm could've worked.
I just finished Season 3 of Breaking Bad. The first half was weaker, the second half was even stronger than Season 2.
I actually liked it best when it focused on this Seasons MVP; Dean Norris. He got a lot to do and had the best episode focues on him, appreciated that.
Even still not exactly feeling that "greatest Show ever" thing, though
Tim: To be honest, even I didn't get the "GOAT" feeling with the show. It's definitely one of the best shows I've watched, however, and I think a lot of it's brilliance really sinks in after the final episode - or more specifically, after following the character's arcs to completion.
And Norris is my #3 behind Cranston and Paul; Hank could've come off as just a jerk, but even in season 1 he's a jerky guy with a genuine heart, who becomes far more developed and layered than expected.
Also, you have some great things coming in Season 4...that's all I'll say.
So apparently Jean Claude Van Damme is cooking up a farewell movie that is basically the same as JCVD, but his character has lost memory of who he is. Guess I'd watch that.
Finally watched Shang-Chi. Liked it a fair bit, actually, although it does fall into "Marvel climax syndrome" and the comedy is not exactly amazing, for the most part. Overall more than decent though, with one absolutely aspect to it, I think you can guess what that it.
Liu-3 (He's fine, but he doesn't QUITE have the leading man thing down yet. I can see him growing into it though.)
Awkwafina-2.5 (She's OK in her semi-dramatic moments, but I did not find her funny at all)
Zhang-2.5
Chen-3
Munteanu-3
Wong-3
Yeoh-3.5
Kingsley- 3.5(The comedy that does work basically all comes from him)
Leung-5(Single handedly elevates the entire film by not playing a villain but instead showing us a man who's completely blinded by grief.)
RIP Ivan Reitman
RIP Ivan Reitman. That one really sucks.
R.I.P. Ivan Reitman
Rest in peace, comedy legend Ivan Reitman.
Also, in an effort to brighten the mood a little, I did wish to mention that I watched "Howl's Moving Castle" for the first time tonight.
After my initial viewing, I'm once again reminded on why I adore Hayao Miyazaki; There's a simple, quaint charm to seeing such spirited hand drawn animation, coupled with a wonderful sense of whimsy complementing some decivingly in depth themes. I liked it a lot, and the fact that it's so hopeful and compassionate doesn't hurt either - especially in these current times.
Post a Comment