Tuesday, 15 February 2022

Best Actor 2021: Benedict Cumberbatch in The Power of the Dog

Benedict Cumberbatch received his second Oscar nomination for portraying Phil Burbank in The Power of the Dog. 

The Power of the Dog tells of the conflict that develops when a rancher's brother brings home his new wife in early 20th century Montana. Watching the film for a third time, I remain fairly consistent in that I think it is a good film that gets occasionally a little stagnant essentially whenever the characters of Phil and Peter aren't onscreen. 

I have to say it is with great pleasure when I must admit that I am wrong about a performer. If a performer proves themselves at some point, Dev Patel and Robert Pattinson come to mind, I love to see that. Benedict Cumberbatch proved me wrong in less than a year's worth of time with this performance. After seeing his turn in the The Mauritanian I decried that Cumberbatch was simply incapable of playing an American, then came this film where he not only plays an American, he plays a western cowboy. Both aspects if they were only on paper I would've scoffed and thought "there is no chance that Cumberbatch can pull this off". Well I was wrong as Cumberbatch does what I thought was the impossible here, which is he is convincingly American in this film. Cumberbatch fashions a convincing accent of a man from Montana. For once while watching the film I actually forgot about Cumberbatch's rich English accent as he took on this harsher timbre here in crafting Phil's voice. A voice that becomes such an essential and natural part of this performance, and Cumberbatch delivers the strongest accent of any of his performances up until this point. Not only does he find a far greater consistency, it is also wholly effective in making you believe that this is a man of Montana from this period, and you just accept it. Cumberbatch forcefully cuts down my own criticism I long had for him, and proved the seemingly impossible possible, and that's established just from the first few minutes of his performance alone.  

It must be said at least one repeat viewing feels essential for this film to understand the film properly, but also to fully appreciate Cumberbatch's performance. This is notable though because Cumberbatch delivers a great performance upon initial viewing, but he almost seems to give another yet different great performance on watching the film again. I feel due to this it is best to look at this performance and as it plays both on my initial viewing on subsequent re watches. Cumberbatch on the initial viewing of course delivers on his accent, but he also delivers on his whole presence as this rough cowboy. Cumberbatch really is best known for his upper-crust English chaps, yet Cumberbatch cuts that image of him down with ease. It isn't the dirt, it is the way that Cumberbatch makes the dirt convincing on him. Cumberbatch's walk is deliberate as a man used to uneven ground and moving through the muck. Cumberbatch's eyes bear an innate intensity of a man who is as used to rocky ground as he is a soft bed. Cumberbatch's physical performance is perfection, as the years of this life exude from every inch of his Phil. The mastery in Cumberbatch's performance doesn't merely end with the way he carries himself, as impressive as that is on his own. 
 
There is so much more that he brings that speaks to his character as Cumberbatch fashions so much in just the way that Phil interacts in his space and with the other people around him. The most surface version of Phil we find is when he is with the rest of the cowboys from his ranch. Cumberbatch simply owns every scene where he basically portrays Phil as holding this kind of king's court among the men. Cumberbatch speaks with an unquestioned authority and just this simple sort of sense of power among the men. There is more to it than that though as he brings this kind of showman's quality to it as well. Every word he speaks has it with it this kind of grand statement as though Phil is speaking these blatant words of wisdom from the lord among men. Cumberbatch is magnetic as he so effortlessly articulates this sense of power that shows him both as the leader among these men but it seems to go even further as this man who just absolutely controls every second of his situation. Cumberbatch shows a man so innately in his element that there is just this force of will about him that is absolutely remarkable. What is most remarkable is that Cumberbatch does it in an entirely new way. Cumberbatch has controlled the screen before as the cold master like in Sherlock, but here he does so with this earthiness that is just as transfixing, but in an entirely new way. 

Cumberbatch in the early scene of the restaurant is brilliant work from the performer every moment he is onscreen. Whether he is standing up or leaning within his chair Cumberbatch demands attention, even kind of enforces it. Every ounce of him exudes the forcefulness of a man's man who is going to make sure you know he's that much of a man's man. Cumberbatch's delivery of the bawdy jokes is fascinating in itself as he delivers them in that aggressive way but with this sort of eyeing insurance that he's making sure he is hitting his marks almost. He's totally convincing but Cumberbatch also is performing as Phil is performing to his crowd of men that he's controlling in his way. Cumberbatch in this same scene shows both Phil's way through specific charisma with these particular men and especially the toxic ways this reveals itself. When commenting on some paper flowers in the restaurant Cumberbatch fashions this kind of almost pleasantry about it initially, playing up the cowboy who should be so happy to get a flower from a pretty lady. When he learns that it was in fact made by Peter Gordon (Kodi Smit-McPhee), their waiter and son of the restaurant owner Rose (Kirsten Dunst), that quickly changes to violent derision. This with the amount of venom Cumberbatch brings in mocking his way of saying "drips" with a lisp with this careful side eye that accentuates the way Phil is playing up to his "manly men" how unimpressed he is by this less traditionally masculine waiter. 

Upon initial viewing it seemed to me that a dominant aspect of Phil was his seeking dominance. And we get that early on with the men and his brother George (Jesse Plemons), with his casual put downs but even more so the ferocity that is shown when something is out of his control. When a player piano interrupts Phil's meal, it also disrupts his control of the situation. Cumberbatch immediate switch to such a powerful intensity is striking and truly menacing as he demands the piano stop playing. Cumberbatch in the moment shows that there is much to back up his swagger and the viciousness of the man is something he can call upon with such powerful ease. This becomes a central conflict when George decides to marry Rose despite Phil's protest to the idea. While Phil cannot dissuade George, we see what this results in as Phil loses control again. Bluntly as he attacks one of their horses noting it to be a female horse, where again Cumberbatch's portrayal captures the extent of the hate that fills Phil. It is incredible work from Cumberbatch as he is absolutely searing on screen in his portrayal of this. When Rose tries to reach out to him in any way, Cumberbatch's delivery couldn't be blunter or more impactful in showing just how little Phil thinks of Rose and sees her as an unwanted presence on the family ranch. Phil doing everything he can to mock and belittle her, and credit to Cumberbatch for simply through his sinister expression can he make banjo playing menacing, when Phil plays an articulate and extravagant tune against Rose's middling at attempt to play the piano. 

The eventual central relationship of the story realizes itself as Peter comes to the farm, and despite Phil initially terrorizing him as well, Phil eventually takes him under his wing to teach him how to ride a horse and work on the ranch. In my initial viewing I thought this relationship closer to something like Claggart and Billy Budd from Billy Budd. Where it speaks towards Phil's hidden homosexuality, but the relationship is built upon the idea of a dominant and submissive relationship. And I think one can be convinced of it in this sense as Cumberbatch certainly portrays this certain joy as he teaches Peter the ropes, and takes great satisfaction over essentially stealing Rose's son away from her. This to the point he's willing to unleash his own wrath against Rose when she sells away the ranch's hides, and Cumberbatch again shows the sheer extent of his hatred when any part of his authority is being questioned. Cumberbatch even still seemingly presenting the state as the proper man's man to Peter as they share a particularly intimate moment when Phil explains having been saved by his old mentor the deceased Bronco Henry and probable lover of Phil. There one could perhaps take it as Phil regaling the tale with whom he had been the submissive one to with George and speaking so with this kind of pride in the relationship as Phil believes he now has such a relationship with Peter. Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately for everyone who's not Phil, Phil is poisoned by anthrax and quickly dies. That is the end of my first viewing, and I thought a stunning portrayal of a hectoring villain. 

I was wrong though and as much as that already would've been a great performance there is so much more to be found in this performance that as there alone. Take his relationship with George where I took it initially as just him belittling his brother. Cumberbatch, even when brutally questioning his decision to want to marry Rose by basically belittling the concept of treating women as anything but a sex object, or plainly calling George names that lack seeming endearment like "Fatso" and "Old man", Cumberbatch actually does quietly suggest that Phil does love his brother in a strange way. Even in the cruel nick names it is with a smile and this odd warmth in Phil's eyes. What's brilliant is Cumberbatch makes it both about power but also genuine human desperation that one can see in the more subtle moments of this performance. In the scenes of Phil alone at night, while George is spending time with Rose, I thought I only saw anger, but no. There is a sense of jealousy, but also this palatable sense of loneliness that Cumberbatch conveys. A desperation that Cumberbatch evokes of a man who seems to believe that he cannot ever have that kind of companionship so he's both angry that his brother has found it, but also saddened by the fact that his brother has left him alone in this way. It's striking by how startling human Cumberbatch is in this moment and reveals so much nuance in Phil. 

Even the scenes of Phil seemingly at his most braggadocios and real the purposeful performance has shadings to them that Cumberbatch so naturally, and brilliantly brings to the character. When Cumberbatch is with all of the other men he rarely glances a look at any of the men. They are essentially this group to be entertained in order for them to fawn over Phil, however there is no a moment in which Cumberbatch conveys genuine connection. They are always merely a crowd for his ego no more and perhaps a lot less. Even the scene of the paper flower misconception Cumberbatch delivers this glint of contemplation towards the beauty of the flower even after having denounced it with such intensity by insulting Peter. There is an appreciation that Cumberbatch suggests albeit so quietly speaking towards the truth of the man while still showing to everyone else the man who would be theoretically disgusted to have praised the pretty flower made by a man. The lack of connection, even with that odd warmth he does show, extends towards George partially from Rose but more so the class separation when George asks that Phil cleanup for a fancy dinner. Honestly a scene I didn't pay that much attention to on initial viewing, in fact thought it was due to Rose's attendance that Phil hated the idea, however it goes deeper than that. Cumberbatch speaks each response dismissively and aggressively as the man who likes "his stink". In that though it isn't just hate it is vulnerability that Cumberbatch conveys as the man who cannot be himself more ways than one. In turn only recapturing his pride in a way by forcefully unleashing his power as he steps in on the dinner. Even with the way Cumberbatch delivers Phil's purposeful mispronunciation of piano, is a man to purposefully play the role of the uncultured, however to do so as an attack in order to defend. 

The aspect of the film that most expanded for me in terms of Cumberbatch's performance was the relationship between Phil and Peter. Although the power dynamic still is there, and likely is motivation for part of Phil's decision to take Peter under his wing, it is not at all the truth of it. Cumberbatch's performance rather reveals that this connection with Peter does go deeper. There are moments even as Peter is initially failing to ride where there are this brief seconds of pride that come across Cumberbatch's face as Phil. Cumberbatch looks directly at Smit-McPhee in their scenes together, and shows the man who is ready and willing to connect in a way he has not been able to for some long. Cumberbatch successfully shows that Phil's intent might not even be wholly the desire for physical companionship rather for mental companionship as well. When Peter says he sees something in the distance as Phil claims to, Cumberbatch's reaction is one of revelation and hope, as though Phil sees the chance for something he thought might've been impossible. The scenes then are colored differently as Phil speaks with some real love, not just to hold dominance, but rather companionship as they work the grounds together. The scene where Peter tells Phil about his father's death is sheer dynamite. The moment where Peter says his father thought him too strong, Cumberbatch delivers the initial insult that Peter's father was "wrong" as he does for George as this reflective instinctual action, however subtly Cumberbatch's expression changes to suggest actual regret for the insult, and even more striking his eyes pierce of a man genuinely trying to listen to Peter in the moment. 
 
The scene of Phil's rage after Rose sold his hides takes on new meaning in particular, as both the motivation that Phil is genuinely upset that he will not be able to finish making a rope for Peter without the hides, but also the reaction to Peter offering him additional hides to finish the rope. Cumberbatch's speaks every word towards Peter, which are words of support and comfort, with absolute earnestness. In the moment he shows the companionship Phil feels is absolutely true and more than just a power play. Even his rage speaks both to his hatred for Rose and his desperation to finish this gift for Peter. The final scene between Peter and Phil then takes on new meaning. Phil telling his story of Bronco Henry and himself Cumberbatch colors with the man reaching out and speaking generously to the connection he once felt. When he shares the cigarette Cumberbatch subtly reveals the eagerness to fully realize this same type of connection with Peter as though Phil has finally found someone he can share life with again. As much as Phil is a horrible person, on re-watch I have to admit I found this moment kind of oddly heartbreaking as Cumberbatch revealed the real vulnerability in Phil, right down to the moment where Phil is dying from Anthrax and wants to give the finished rope (which Peter used to poison Phil) to Peter. Cumberbatch shows the man honestly wanting to give the gift to the man who ended up being his murderer not his companion. This is an extraordinary turn by Benedict Cumberbatch. As on the surface it is an effortlessly compelling and domineering portrayal of a man attempting to control all aspects of his life, but as you look closer Cumberbatch reveals an even more potent portrayal of a man wrestling with the loneliness of his idiosyncratic self. Cumberbatch realizes such complexity here and crafts an astonishing portrait of Phil Burbank where the more you peel away the more there is.

55 comments:

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Given just how elaborate and glowing this review was...I think we have a winner.
Phenomenal work by Cumberbatch. I loved that as brilliant he was as this showy villain and deconstruction of masculinity, it's the loneliness in his eyes that really sells the tragedy of the character.

Luke Higham said...

Incredible performance, great to see him get his 1st film five (3rd overall) here.

Mitchell Murray said...

Outstanding work. Not only his best American accent (an old point, but it deserves repeating), but his new career peak by far.

I'll admit, Cumberbatch showed sides of his range here I wasn't expecting at all; It's such a searing, intense portrayal of a man lashing out at the world, overcompensating to try and live up to an image of man-hood - all the while screaming internally for relations he can't have. It's a transformative, layered, visceral turn that will hopefully be given it's due praise.

Bryan L. said...

Does anyone here feel that Cumberbatch may have actually been miscast on purpose? As in, the fact that he isn’t American adds another layer to his performance, since the main point behind his character is that he’s macho posturing.

Also, it’s Jane Campion, so she surely had to have know what she was doing in the casting stages.

Bryan L. said...

(Just some food for thought)

Also, does anyone want to discuss how they filmed this in New Zealand (when it takes place in Montana)? I know it was most likely out of necessity and to keep costs down, but…I don’t know…I feel like it adds a new look to the Western, in a good way.

Mitchell Murray said...

Bryan: Possibly. The fact that he was able to share scenes with multiple American co-stars (including the Texas born Jesse Plemons) and seem totally at home does speak to it's effectiveness.

Mitchell Murray said...

I mean, New Zealand has such a diverse and beautiful terrain, I'm sure a lot of film makers would love shooting there. As a temperate climate, it's also similar enough to most parts of North America, you could pass it off as almost anything but the southern States.

Matt Mustin said...

Brilliant performance, and BY FAR the greatest work I've seen from him.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Day-um, he might win overall!

Matt Mustin said...

Also, this is an extraordinary analysis and one thing I didn't really think about too much is how the roles are completely reversed by the end of the film, where Phil is entirely submissive to Peter at the end, and Peter, who started out very much being dominated by Phil, ends up being the dominant one and neither performance loses a single step in showing that.

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: Also, this has nothing to do with this, but I remember something you wrote once about the tavern showdown in Unforgiven about how Eastwood was always known for squinting and in this, maybe the most intense moment of his career, he kept his eyes wide open. I never, ever thought about that before, and I was looking at that scene again and it really does change it.

Luke Higham said...

The difference between this and his 1st nomination is staggering.

Anonymous said...

Where could I find Louis' thoughts on Belle?

JimmyStewart said...

I know Louis hates Dunst, but, actually, one of my most favorite scenes from this outstanding movie are those, when Rose silently and with fear in her eyes follows Peter and Phil. At first, I thought she fears Phil will hurt Peter. But now, after rewatching it several times, I gravitate towards thinking that Rose is probably the only person who has recognized Peter's true nature. And she knows it is her son who is more capable of doing something evil to Phil.

I also think if Cumberbatch isn't awarded this year for this terrific performance, in a few years they will give him an Oscar for some mediocre role, just because he's a good actor. A Morgan Freeman, Jack Palance or Tommy Lee Jones sort of a pity award.

HTT said...

Love seeing a 5 for Cumberbatch. Certainly one of the best performances of the year.

Also, is it only me who thinks Dunst was excellent? I'd personally give her a 4/5 or a 4.5/5.

Razor said...

Hmmm... looks like a career best performance and possible overall winner.

Anonymous: Belle thoughts...

https://actoroscar.blogspot.com/2022/01/alternate-best-actor-1971-clint.html

Anonymous said...

Luke, your updated top 5 Cumberbatch performances.

Luke Higham said...

1. The Power Of The Dog
2. Henry VI, Part II and Richard III
3. Sherlock (My 2nd favourite after McKellen)
4. Patrick Melrose
5. The Imitation Game

I remember years ago when there was a discussion about him and Redmayne being comparable and it feels utterly absurd now.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: When you get to 2016, I'm pretty certain you'll watch War & Peace (Dano/Buckley) and The Night Manager (John Le Carré) but please don't put Hollow Crown II on the back burner, Cumberbatch's portrayal is a worthy companion to both Olivier and McKellen.

Luke Higham said...

Also, Cumberbatch will take the win here because no matter how much Louis loves a Shakespearean performance, they generally don't win an overall or even finish 2nd with McKellen, Cagney and soon to be Hunter being the only exceptions and even Cagney won due to having only solid turns rather than great ones during that period.

Calvin Law said...

Delighted with this review and I’m really happy for him. You loved him even more than I expected honestly.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Have you seen any of these films:
Memoria
Benedetta
Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy
The Souvenir Part II
The World To Come
Bergman Island
Bruised
The Unforgivable
A Journal For Jordan

Calvin Law said...

Also I really do hope he wins the Oscar. I can’t wait to see what they use for his clip.

Calvin Law said...

Luke: He’s seen Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy and liked it, gave the cast a collective 4.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: Thanks, that's one I easily forgot about.

Anonymous said...

Cumberbatch and Washington are the new names that will enter the "My Nominations" page.

Anonymous said...

I really hope that Cumberbatch is as lucky as Hopkins when it comes to winning an Oscar.

Luke Higham said...

Oh and Patel being mentioned in the review gives me alot of hope for his Green Knight review.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Pretty ridiculous we considered him and Redmayne comparable even then, just his work in Sherlock blows everything Redmayme did out of the water.

Tim said...

Calvin: I hope they do it like '20 and show several clips again

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Just give ratings for now and I'll ask for thoughts on any 4+ afterwards.

Emi Grant said...

Goddamn. I knew I could expect a 5, but this definitely reads out like a year-winning performance. I gotta admit, while I could understand some of Phil's points of vulnerability and his implied hidden homosexuality throughout my first two viewings, there's still stuff I missed (like the power dynamic play) that I now realize with this review.

I swear I find so much more substantial criticism in this blog than anywhere else. Excellent write-up, Louis.

Luke Higham said...

I think it's a tad premature to say he's winning the overall but he's definitely top 3 minimum.

Mitchell Murray said...

Emi: Yah, that's one of the reasons I ultimately decided to stop my own blog spot. Creative writing takes a lot out of you, and some of us are more gifted at it then others. Also in retrospect, I couldn't help but feel a lot of my reviews were pale imitations of the ones found here.

I guess the fact that I focussed on purely leading turns also didn't help, since they generally take more time and focus than supporting performances.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I think it's between Cumberbatch, Nishijima and Washington for the overall. If I had to guess though, probably Cumberbatch.

Anonymous said...

Guys, what would you rather have. Alternate Supporting or Lead next.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Supporting. Lead is without doubt the main event this year. Reason we had Supporting last from 2020 was mainly because the Academy struck gold with their lead actor lineup in the same way as 2016 and Louis had already decided on his winner whereas he didn't decide his winner for Supporting until the overall ranking was revealed.

Luke Higham said...

And I've just noticed, I like the Nightmare Alley shot in the background Louis.

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Spinotti's work in The Last of the Mohican.

Anonymous said...

Luke, aside from the performances you're predicting fives for, who do you predict to be the highest 4.5.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Either Peter Dinklage (I have a feeling he's gonna be Calvin's Lucas Hedges in Boy Erased for 2021 where he rates him very highly but Louis can't quite put him on that level, his reservations about the songs are a stumbling block and with any musical performance you need the overall package to have a good level of consistency to elevate it further) or James Norton.

Emi Grant said...

Mitchell: I get that. There's an unspoken grind to creative/critical writing.

That said, I personally miss your blog, dude. You struck gold with Mary Elizabeth Winstead's review for All About Nina.

BRAZINTERMA said...

Hello Louis and folks.
Starting today I want to do a new series of posts when Louis does a year's reanalysis: sharing the translated names of the movies. For those who are from a country whose language is not English, please feel free to talk about the translations.

For starters I will talk about the films that are running for the Oscars 2022. There are some films that I don't mention because the titles were kept in the original name or were translated literally. Very well, the translations made in BRAZIL are...
- CODA = In the Rhythm of the Heart
- King Richard = King Richard: Creating Champions (when a character's title is always accompanied by a subtitle)
- The Power of the Dog = Attack of the Dogs
- West Side Story = Love, Sublime Love
- Being the Ricardos = Introducing the Ricardos
- Coming 2 America = A Prince in New York 2

Did you know that a lot of people believed that Licorice Pizza would have a name translated to "Park of Dreams". Fortunately it was all a mistake, it was all just a Google confusion between the PTA movie and animation Wonder Park (2019).

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I find the retitling of films in other countries to be really fascinating. Bangladesh doesn't do that though, they usually leave Hollywood films with their original titles.

Tim said...

Brazinterma: legit, not a single title from a Best Picture Nominee was changed in Germany this year.

Some like Parallel Mothers, No Time to Die and the Disney movies got literal translations. Other than that; The Tragedy of Macbeth turned into simply "Macbeth" and The Lost Daughter is called "Woman in the Dark". That's it.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Brazinterma: In Poland The Power of the Dog is known as The Claws of the Dog and The Lost Daughter is now simply the Daughter, but all the other translated titles are otherwise pretty uneventful.

Louis Morgan said...

Matt & Emi:

Thank you, honestly anytime someone says they see something new in a performance from one of my reviews I view it as the highest of compliments.

Luke:

Memoria - Didn't like it. I get what it was going for, pacing didn't work for me in the approach again not everyone can be Tarkovsky to be the broken record again. Also the Dead Don't Die scene was just ridiculous, particularly since such a scene had already been done with Tilda Swinton.

Swinton - 4

Benedetta I really didn't care for either. Thought it was overlong and really seemed to be depending hard on its more salacious elements, which I didn't mind, but the film never quite came together for me as something truly compelling in analyzing its atypical themes.

Efira - 3.5
Rampling - 3.5
Patakia - 4
Wilson - 3

I liked The World To Come's aesthetic, and Kirby's performance, but sadly everything else was far too thin. Whether it be the main character, or the men, I mean if you're going to risk the baggage of Affleck at least have him act as he's good at it. The presentation is there, just the content isn't quite. Also that's definitely not New York...but I digress.

Waterston - 3
Kirby - 4
Abbott - 2
Affleck - 2.5

I kind of hated Bergman Island, which didn't pay homage to Bergman in my mind, rather did their own Woody Allen Bergman take, yet less effectively. In fact I felt it successfully failed twice in the same film to do any sort of Bergmanesque realizations.

Wasikowska - 3
Krieps - 3.5
Roth - 3
Lie - 3

Luke Higham said...

Thoughts on Swinton, Efira, Rampling, Patakia, Kirby and Krieps.

Louis Morgan said...

Brazinterma:

Song:

With Inside:

My Nominees:

"Lend Me Your Voice" - Belle
"No Time to Die" - No Time to Die
"U" - Belle
"Welcome to the Internet" - Inside
"White Woman's Instagram" - Inside

Rest Of the Top Ten:

6. "Goodbye" - Inside
7. "A Million Miles Away" - Belle
8. "That Funny Feeling" - Inside
9. "Skies of Song" - Belle
10. "All Eyes on me" - Inside

Without Inside:

My Nominees:

"A Million Miles Away" - Belle
"Lend Me Your Voice" - Belle
"No Time to Die" - No Time to Die
"Skies of Song" - Belle
"U" - Belle

Rest of the Top Ten:

6. "So May We Start" - Annette
7. "Be Alive" - King Richard
8. "We Don't Talk About Bruno" - Encanto
9. "Gawain Runs and Runs" - The Green Knight
10. "Every Letter" - Cyrano

Anonymous said...

Louis: Thoughts on Abbott, Affleck and the rest of the Bergman Island cast.

Calvin Law said...

I’ve read this review multiple times now and like Cumberbatch’s performance, it gets better on re-reading.

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Well as always Mann goes for that naturalistic lighting look to his films. Here fashioned not in the darkness and fluorescent lighting of a city rather the splendor of nature that has been only lighting touched by civilization. Spinotti beautifully captures the simple pleasure of it by making the lighting just natural as that, and making appreciate as straight forward as it can be. This is though with framing and composition that purposefully shows an expansive area, and the glory of the horizon.

Luke:

Swinton - (I mean some ways one of her most straight forward performances as her whole portrayal is to emphasize just a person living her life with this pressing question on her mind. Swinton certainly articulates this particular conflict effectively and brings the appropriate degree of naturalism. Her portrayal being convincing within the style even if I think there is too much dead air in and around when she is actually doing something.)

Efira - (I will say here is where a better performance could've take it to higher heights for me. This is because while I thought she was fine I only ever got kind of a surface idea of her performance. There's not a lot of depth within her turn and creates no sort of internal logic within her performance. She's fine as is, but there is never that more visceral sense of the character if she managed to bring to life her particular connection to faith say compared to say what Redgrave does in The Devils.)

Patakaia - (The more interesting of the two performances in the film because I do think she gets towards a little more depth in the more straight forward version of the part, who is more a victim of circumstance and her relationship to her situation is more matter of fact. Efira's performance delivers on that stress upon the situation and blunter sense of dissatisfaction and trauma.)

Rampling - (I mean its one where the performance is more or less what you'd expect which means she delivers but almost to the point that she might deliver too much of exactly what you might expect.)

Kirby - (Again the best part of the film. She not only just evokes the period effectively, she really gives this effective combination between life and distress. This in the scenes with Waterston she is beautiful in terms of crafting the sense of life and warmth that she gets from the interactions between the two. She finds the right genuine endearing connection there. This against the scenes of portraying the sense of anxiety and degradation that she suffers as her situation becomes more severe.)

Krieps - (I mean just *Slightly* more interesting than anyone else, who are all fine though fairly surface in portraying the particular complexities of life being discovered here. They don't make the complexities all that complex though as the interactions just are too simple and the manner too relaxed in way. She's fine just as everyone is in the film, but only just that to a fault. There's just a little more in her portrayal of her creative frustrations but that's about it.)

Anonymous:

Abbott and Affleck - (Both super thin roles. Affleck's a complete waste. He's just kind of there, though he's fine. Abbott struggles with the bad husband role going for an obvious and rather overplayed one note.)

Refer to my Krieps thoughts.

Calvin:

Thank you.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: your thoughts on "Just Look Up" from Don't Look Up, "We Don't Talk About Bruno" from Encanto and "So May We Start" from Annette?

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

"Just Look Up" pretty much summed up the humor of the film for me. As the song is mostly a derivative ballad but they say the f-word hehehehe, isn't that hilarious? No. Well I rarely like auto-tune anyway so the only segue I found quite tiresome. Like the rest of the film, maybe an idea there, but the execution is off.

Where I felt a lot of the Miranda magic was off in Encanto, in that I have come to actually dislike most of the songs at this point unlike Hamilton, In the Height and even Moana where I liked almost all the songs, this one actually come together in creating a conducive chorus and effectively does his typical way of telling story through the song. The balance works here, and as does the actual beat of the song.

So May We Start is interesting in that I really wasn't all that into the song when watching the film, but listening to it since then I have come to rather like it. This with just a terrific percussion build that builds in the syncopated lyrics, and slowly adding voices into the songs that is the only song in the film that seems to desire to have any real fun with the material. This one actually works in basically introducing the film though and delivers quite the upbeat and kinetic intro to a film that is anything but.

Mitchell Murray said...

Emi: Thank you for saying that. Although with that performance in particular, it doesn't surprise me at all that I seemed to be the only person covering it.