4. Franchot Tone in Mutiny on the Bounty- Franchot done does his job well enough, but he never is all that amazing either. His character mostly reacts. Tone handles his reactions well enough, but still his performance never really stands out all that much.
3. Charles Laughton in Mutiny on the Bounty- Charles Laughton plays Bligh as a cruel man, a man who is simple and very cruel. Laughton portrays Bligh's cruelty in an effective manner both quietly when being systematically evil, and when being louder when his authority is challenged.
2. Clark Gable in Mutiny on the Bounty- Clark Gable has his usual slick charm and manner here which work especially well for Fletcher Christian. Gable gives a strong star performance that fulfills Flercher's role of passion and power perfectly.
1. Victor McLaglen in The Informer-McLaglen gives a terrific portrait of a man whose conscience slowly but surely grows on him, despite making great attempts to ignore it. McLaglen performance is incredibly effective and very memorable. He makes Gypo Nolan a fascinating as well as likable character, making this an early Oscar well deserved.
Showing posts with label 1935. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1935. Show all posts
Tuesday, 11 January 2011
Best Actor 1935: Victor McLaglen in The Informer
Victor McLaglen won an Oscar from his first Oscar nomination for portraying Gypo Nolan in The Informer.
The Informer is an effective film, since it takes view of the informer, and really presents his fight with his own conscience. My own problem with film is I think it should have stayed with Gypo Nolan for the entire film rather than drifting from his point of view a few times which it really should not have.
Victor McLaglen who eventually played many character actor roles as usually a tough Irishman of varying dispositions. It rather interesting to see him here as Gypo Nolan though because Gypo although is still technically formidable physically he is a very unassuming man. It is fascinating to see McLaglen as a very vulnerable man. I think particularly here scene where he meets his old IRA pal. His telling of how he could not kill another man, really shows that Gypo is a simple man who was forced by others to be more brutal than he wanted to be.
I find McLaglen creation of Gypo rather interesting because he makes him such a simple sad man. He is not what I would say as stupid exactly but just simple. He really wants just a good life, but sees things in too simple of fashion. McLaglen creates this almost always drifting character wonderfully. The fact that Gypo informs on his old friend to the British army really is completely natural because the way McLaglen established Gypo as such a man. He did not really even seem to inform on him for Greed but rather that getting 20 pounds from his informing would everything right. Now none of this really said in the film, but I feel McLaglen suggests it all in the sad faced, simple performance Gypo.
After receiving his awards McLaglen shows a more joyful Gypo, combined with a sometimes clear and sometimes silent guilt that slowly grows as his night drinking and spending the money goes. McLaglen creates a fascinating performance of a man who tries to hide his guilt and responsibility with outburst of sadness, with blaming others, and with pleasures gained from the money. McLaglen portrays all of Gypo's conflicting emotions well without overplaying any of them, but always seeming to react in the perfect way which fits Gypo.
The growing guilt and drunkenness are both handled well by McLaglen as they both grow through the night, until finally he is brought to an IRA trial, where his guilt is brought to the forefront, and his drunkenness turns to the pain of a hangover. McLaglen is excellent in this pivotal scene showing both the internal and external pain of Gypo equally well, creating a powerful performance showing the Gypo really just did not know what he was doing when he turned his friend in. I find this is a great performance since he makes a very simple man fascinating, is compelling to follow through his journey during the night, and since he makes Gypo, who did a very bad thing, stay likable. I was on the fence of a 4.5 and 5 but I fell to the latter because the performance has really had a lasting effect on me, and remain quite vivid.
The Informer is an effective film, since it takes view of the informer, and really presents his fight with his own conscience. My own problem with film is I think it should have stayed with Gypo Nolan for the entire film rather than drifting from his point of view a few times which it really should not have.
Victor McLaglen who eventually played many character actor roles as usually a tough Irishman of varying dispositions. It rather interesting to see him here as Gypo Nolan though because Gypo although is still technically formidable physically he is a very unassuming man. It is fascinating to see McLaglen as a very vulnerable man. I think particularly here scene where he meets his old IRA pal. His telling of how he could not kill another man, really shows that Gypo is a simple man who was forced by others to be more brutal than he wanted to be.
I find McLaglen creation of Gypo rather interesting because he makes him such a simple sad man. He is not what I would say as stupid exactly but just simple. He really wants just a good life, but sees things in too simple of fashion. McLaglen creates this almost always drifting character wonderfully. The fact that Gypo informs on his old friend to the British army really is completely natural because the way McLaglen established Gypo as such a man. He did not really even seem to inform on him for Greed but rather that getting 20 pounds from his informing would everything right. Now none of this really said in the film, but I feel McLaglen suggests it all in the sad faced, simple performance Gypo.
After receiving his awards McLaglen shows a more joyful Gypo, combined with a sometimes clear and sometimes silent guilt that slowly grows as his night drinking and spending the money goes. McLaglen creates a fascinating performance of a man who tries to hide his guilt and responsibility with outburst of sadness, with blaming others, and with pleasures gained from the money. McLaglen portrays all of Gypo's conflicting emotions well without overplaying any of them, but always seeming to react in the perfect way which fits Gypo.
The growing guilt and drunkenness are both handled well by McLaglen as they both grow through the night, until finally he is brought to an IRA trial, where his guilt is brought to the forefront, and his drunkenness turns to the pain of a hangover. McLaglen is excellent in this pivotal scene showing both the internal and external pain of Gypo equally well, creating a powerful performance showing the Gypo really just did not know what he was doing when he turned his friend in. I find this is a great performance since he makes a very simple man fascinating, is compelling to follow through his journey during the night, and since he makes Gypo, who did a very bad thing, stay likable. I was on the fence of a 4.5 and 5 but I fell to the latter because the performance has really had a lasting effect on me, and remain quite vivid.
Monday, 10 January 2011
Best Actor 1935: Clark Gable, Franchot Tone, and Charles Laughton in Mutiny on the Bounty
Mutiny on the Bounty is an aged film certainly but it still is enjoyable in its own old fashioned way. The story is not really accurate apparently Captain Bligh was really just a man trying to do his job, and the mutineers all ended up basically killing each other when they got to their paradise of an island, instead the it position the film as a struggle between good and cruelty. The three nominees represent different parts of this conflict on the ship.
First there is Clark Gable who received his second Oscar nomination for portraying Fletcher Christian. Fletcher Christian as portrayed here is the good man aboard the ship who tries his best to help his fellow sailors, and eventually takes the ship due to the cruelty of Captain Bligh. Christian is not all too complicated none of the characters are, nor do they exactly need to be.
Clark Gable sans his usual mustache portrays Fletcher Christian effectively. Christian as I said is not a complicated character but just an honest man doing his best to make conditions on the Bounty better. He portrays Christian with the right amount of passion, and power in the performance. He is instantly believable as the the commander of the men, and there is absoultely no doubt that people would look up to Christian in this film.
Clark Gable gives a very good performance and does have his usual charm which is an always welcome factor in his film. I would say that his charm is not quite as great as in his other two Oscar nominated performances but it still is always apparent in this performance. I would say the most important part of his performance is just the fact that it is so easy to follow through the film with Gable in the lead. He was a true movie star and he proves that once again with his undeniable charm and screen presence. It is not his best performance but it is again a good one, which completely works well for the dashing daring Fletcher Christian.
In the middle the semi-neutral party is Ensign Byan in portrayed by Franchot Tone with his only Oscar nomination. Byan is a simple idealistic midshipman, who like Christian wants to be treated with respect, and also dislikes the cruelty of Captain Bligh. Byan though does not really act out, he says Bligh has done wrong, but does not end up participating in the Mutiny himself.
Tone actually is just fine in his role as Byan, who really is more of a supporting role, but since there was only one actor category there is no surprise he was nominated here. Byan is not complicated but Tone portrays him as just the good guy he is. He handles Byan's reactions realistically and effectively enough. He and Gable get along well in the film as well, and their scenes together work fairly well.
My reservation is Byan does not do all that much, but stand in the middle between the forces for most of the film, but he does not standout like Bligh's nastiness does, and Christian's charm, but than again nor should he since he is the man in the middle really. Byan though eventually does have to stand up for himself, when he is put on trial as a mutineer. Tone handles his one big scene at the end fairly well, even if not amazingly. Overall Tone is never all that special in his role, but he is just fine.
Finally the last part of the struggle is the evil Captain Bligh portrayed by Charles Laughton in his second Oscar nomination. Charles Laughton portrays Bligh as an evil slimy Captain. Bligh I would not say is really portrayed as a whole human being but perhaps is more representation of a type of systematic cruelty.
Laughton portrays Bligh fairly well even if the character is rather simple. Bligh as written mostly does just two things. One of them is smugly look at the proceedings as he orders other people about, whether that is their task, or if he orders a cold punishment for a mind infraction. Laughton is properly cold and calculated in his cruelty. He shows his characters power madness in such a strict structural ways that works well once again with the film.
Bligh really is never not being evil even if at times he is doing the ship work in a normal captain like way. He never really acts as a normal human being, but nor is he suppose to be. This is a film about very thematic characters and no character is more like this than Laughton. Laughton never really acting like a normal descent person is appropriate with Bligh's power hungry attitudes, and the fact that he is suppose to be really just an evil villain not a normal person.
He really is suppose to be the representation of cruelty which Laughton does quite well. He does this both when he acts rather quietly evil with just the orders when he is control, or when he roars and yells back at Christian in the pivotal mutiny scene. Laughton performance is not an amazing one, or even a subtle one but like the others it is an effective performance that work well for the film.
First there is Clark Gable who received his second Oscar nomination for portraying Fletcher Christian. Fletcher Christian as portrayed here is the good man aboard the ship who tries his best to help his fellow sailors, and eventually takes the ship due to the cruelty of Captain Bligh. Christian is not all too complicated none of the characters are, nor do they exactly need to be.
Clark Gable sans his usual mustache portrays Fletcher Christian effectively. Christian as I said is not a complicated character but just an honest man doing his best to make conditions on the Bounty better. He portrays Christian with the right amount of passion, and power in the performance. He is instantly believable as the the commander of the men, and there is absoultely no doubt that people would look up to Christian in this film.
Clark Gable gives a very good performance and does have his usual charm which is an always welcome factor in his film. I would say that his charm is not quite as great as in his other two Oscar nominated performances but it still is always apparent in this performance. I would say the most important part of his performance is just the fact that it is so easy to follow through the film with Gable in the lead. He was a true movie star and he proves that once again with his undeniable charm and screen presence. It is not his best performance but it is again a good one, which completely works well for the dashing daring Fletcher Christian.
In the middle the semi-neutral party is Ensign Byan in portrayed by Franchot Tone with his only Oscar nomination. Byan is a simple idealistic midshipman, who like Christian wants to be treated with respect, and also dislikes the cruelty of Captain Bligh. Byan though does not really act out, he says Bligh has done wrong, but does not end up participating in the Mutiny himself.
Tone actually is just fine in his role as Byan, who really is more of a supporting role, but since there was only one actor category there is no surprise he was nominated here. Byan is not complicated but Tone portrays him as just the good guy he is. He handles Byan's reactions realistically and effectively enough. He and Gable get along well in the film as well, and their scenes together work fairly well.
My reservation is Byan does not do all that much, but stand in the middle between the forces for most of the film, but he does not standout like Bligh's nastiness does, and Christian's charm, but than again nor should he since he is the man in the middle really. Byan though eventually does have to stand up for himself, when he is put on trial as a mutineer. Tone handles his one big scene at the end fairly well, even if not amazingly. Overall Tone is never all that special in his role, but he is just fine.
Finally the last part of the struggle is the evil Captain Bligh portrayed by Charles Laughton in his second Oscar nomination. Charles Laughton portrays Bligh as an evil slimy Captain. Bligh I would not say is really portrayed as a whole human being but perhaps is more representation of a type of systematic cruelty.
Laughton portrays Bligh fairly well even if the character is rather simple. Bligh as written mostly does just two things. One of them is smugly look at the proceedings as he orders other people about, whether that is their task, or if he orders a cold punishment for a mind infraction. Laughton is properly cold and calculated in his cruelty. He shows his characters power madness in such a strict structural ways that works well once again with the film.
Bligh really is never not being evil even if at times he is doing the ship work in a normal captain like way. He never really acts as a normal human being, but nor is he suppose to be. This is a film about very thematic characters and no character is more like this than Laughton. Laughton never really acting like a normal descent person is appropriate with Bligh's power hungry attitudes, and the fact that he is suppose to be really just an evil villain not a normal person.
He really is suppose to be the representation of cruelty which Laughton does quite well. He does this both when he acts rather quietly evil with just the orders when he is control, or when he roars and yells back at Christian in the pivotal mutiny scene. Laughton performance is not an amazing one, or even a subtle one but like the others it is an effective performance that work well for the film.
Labels:
1935,
Best Actor,
Charles Laughton,
Clark Gable,
Franchot Tone,
oscar
Saturday, 8 January 2011
Best Actor 1935
And the Nominees Were:
Victor McLaglen in The Informer
Clark Gable in Mutiny on the Bounty
Franchot Tone in Mutiny on the Bounty
Charles Laughton in Mutiny on the Bounty
Who will it be the informer or one of the men of the bounty?
Note: I decided not to include Paul Muni in Black Fury because he was not nominated actually. He got votes but someone like Boris Karloff for Bride of Frankenstein technically could have as well, so I decided to only take the actually nominated.
Victor McLaglen in The Informer
Clark Gable in Mutiny on the Bounty
Franchot Tone in Mutiny on the Bounty
Charles Laughton in Mutiny on the Bounty
Who will it be the informer or one of the men of the bounty?
Note: I decided not to include Paul Muni in Black Fury because he was not nominated actually. He got votes but someone like Boris Karloff for Bride of Frankenstein technically could have as well, so I decided to only take the actually nominated.
Labels:
1935,
Best Actor,
Charles Laughton,
Clark Gable,
Franchot Tone,
oscar,
Victor McLaglen
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













