Showing posts with label 1953 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1953 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts

Wednesday, 27 May 2026

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Results

5. Kazou Hasegawa in Gate of Hell - Hasegawa is able to hit the extreme notes called upon him as a character with limited substance but is very much overshadowed by his co-stars who express a bit more nuance in their roles. 
 
Best Scene:  Ending
 
4. Jack Hawkins in The Cruel Sea - Hawkins gives a reliably good performance however his fully lead performance here suggests the possible limitations of his ability as a leading man as a opposed to a character actor. 
 
Best Scene: After the choosing to ignore the men in the sea. 
3. Charles Boyer in The Earrings of Madame de…. - Boyer gives an effective performance in very much playing into his imperious presence in an effective way as essentially presenting his character as above typical human interaction.
 
Best Scene: Requesting the duel. 
2. James Stewart in The Naked Spur - Stewart gives an effectively raw portrayal of a damaged man and successfully downplays his typical charm and heroic presence. 
 
Best Scene: Making the final choice. 
1. Chishū Ryū in Tokyo Story - Good prediction Calvin. Ryū gives a low key but powerful portrayal of the different quiet shades of a father and finding the joy but also painful truths of this man. 
 
Best Scene: Tragedy strikes 
 
Next: 1953 Supporting Reviews (Not a lineup) 

Friday, 15 May 2026

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Chishū Ryū in Tokyo Story

Chishū Ryū did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Shūkichi Hirayama in Tokyo Story. 

Tokyo Story is a masterful film about an elderly couple visiting their adult children in Tokyo. 

Longtime Yasujirō Ozu collaborator Chishū Ryū plays the male half of the couple, along with Chieko Higashiyama as Shūkichi’s wife Tomi, who actually wasn’t particularly old when the film was shot. Ryū plays the old man though it works honestly because he doesn’t try to put on any overt “old man” mannerisms like a crusty voice or over the top movement. Rather Ryū is convincing just with the calm deliberate manner of the man. That's a very subtle but believable way to make us believe that his father is the age the film says he’s in. Although anyone familiar with Ryū shouldn’t be too surprised that he takes such a modest approach as that is very much his creed as a performer and always the ideal fit for the equally modest style of Ozu. Much like Ozu, Ryū thrives often in the margins and in this instance Ryū’s performance particularly exists in the moments between moments. As much of Ryū’s screen-time as the father is just going about as a visiting dad. We see him with his wife where he and Higashiyama share a naturalistic and believable chemistry. There’s nothing complicated about it; they just simply are connected as they are. When visiting the adult children, including his daughter Shige (Haruko Sugimura), a hairdresser, and son Kōichi, a doctor, (Sō Yamamura), Ryū’s performance is one of largely quiet modesty. Ryū exudes the sense of the father not wanting to be too much of a bother most of the time keeping largely a smile on his face and a very pleasant demeanor even when both children end up struggling to spend all that much truly devoted time to their parents. The only person in Tokyo who truly goes out of her way is their daughter-in-law, the widow of their deceased son, Noriko (Setsuko Hara), who gladly spends time with them. Where Ryū even within his frequently smiling manner does exude that much of a greater genuine appreciation in this interaction that shows the difference between the smile just to be pleasant and the man reacting to a real appreciation for him. 

The majority of Ryū’s performance is that smile and a pleasant nod, that isn’t a criticism however as the power of his performance is when that smile or nod is broken in anyway and the keen way in which Ryū is able to make such an impact out of so little changes within that, which ends up being rather profound in the nuance. There’s a moment early on where his wife mentions his drinking in older times and just the little annoyed noise that Ryū makes speaks to so much suddenly, as we get some insight into a man whose younger years were a bit more defined by alcohol than maybe he’d like to admit to. When speaking to his wife about his children even within the certain disappointment towards how his daughter is meaner than she used to be and his son is a much smaller scale doctor than he expected, Ryū’s changes to more contemplative and you are gained instantly the insights into how the man truly feels beneath the pleasant smile. When discussing the kids in general not having time for him and his wife, Ryū’s performance keeps the calm yet the sadness is so profoundly there between the smiles. It is truly remarkable because Ryū makes it all feel so natural when you catch just those glimpses of the man’s pain that he mostly keeps down. One of the most profound moments of this is when he goes out drinking with some other older men and Ryū’s moment of talking about his deceased son is tremendous. It isn’t a long moment yet just his degree of losing his composure, the sadness suddenly coming up, before pushing it down to just be there to be joyful with his friends is outstanding work from Ryū. Which the scene probably leads to his most overt scene though less serious, where Ryū is regardless effective in depicting the drunken near blacked out saunter of the dad who takes his friend to his daughter’s home and steadfastly ignores her questions. 

The journey ends as it does with the parents returning home, however spoilers tragedy strikes when the mother takes ill then dies soon afterwards. This being quite frankly executed in one of the least melodramatic deaths in any film while also being one of the most heartbreaking because of just how natural it all feels. Key to the power of this is Ryū’s performance, he is amazing because we just see the steps in the man losing his composure, it is almost entirely physical work, particularly just as his wife dies, yet in the way you suddenly see the anxiety and sadness take over it is so painful to witness within the man who had almost entirely such a calm sunny disposition. Maybe most powerful is that even physically we see that he is absolutely distraught as man, his delivery of words just admiring the dawn, Ryū delivers with almost that same calm yet even within that calm we see how fundamental of a loss this truly was for the man. A man who in no way takes his loss as his own and we see Ryū’s portrayal of him being there for his children. Even more so there being for his daughter-in-law, the person who stays the longest with him and seems to most understand his loss. Their final conversation is so poignant where Ryū brings such earnest empathy as he encourages her to move on from his son, meanwhile still showing the pain of essentially looking forward to a life of loneliness himself. Ryū manages to bring the power in the subtle sense of the man’s acceptance, that isn’t acceptance without pain but rather is acceptance of that pain. His final scene being particularly understated of the man just looking out, now alone, in a new day Ryū has that consistency of the man’s presence yet he is no way the same man. You feel that loss in his quietude, and it is as tremendous as the most intense tragedy. 

Friday, 8 May 2026

Alternate Best Actor/Best Supporting Actor 1953: James Stewart & Robert Ryan in The Naked Spur

James Stewart did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Howard Kemp in The Naked Spur. 

The Naked Spur is a terrific western about three disparate men trying to take in one outlaw with a large bounty on his head. 

Despite my love of Stewart as an actor I have somehow never talked about one of his most important collaborations in his career which was with director Anthony Mann in a series of westerns starting with Winchester ‘73 in 1950. These are not your standard westerns and this is a distinct set of performances within Stewart’s career. Long have I held It’s A Wonderful Life as this essential branching off point between essentially pre-war and post-war Stewart where there was a combination through the easy going “aw shucks” charm of the previous period while also alluding to the darkness that would come later with Mann and also two of his collaborations with Alfred Hitchcock, particularly Vertigo. Although interestingly I would say with the Hitchcock films Stewart is still utilizing some aspects, to tremendous impact, of his old presence very modestly, the Mann westerns are notable in that they feel almost like an outright purge of that spirit. As Stewart in this film won’t be saying “aw” or “shucks”, not once, and despite ostensibly playing our hero of the film, to describe his Howard Kemp simply as a hero would not be strictly accurate. 

That idea is quite evident from the opening scene of the film as even Stewart’s resting face here just feels burdened by life already and there’s no sense that he intends to charm anyone. Rather his eyes are evoking a man just on a mission to the point he comes across everyone with suspicion and Stewart, who really always had the most potent of intensity whenever he needed it, delivers that as an innate factor. As we first follow him as he comes across an old prospector Jesse Tate (Millard Mitchell), with suspicion first, Stewart delivers every word with an exact interrogation and every movement is to control the potential attack of the other man. Only when it is clear the man isn’t a threat to him that we get an offer from Howard to Jesse to help him catch the man he’s looking for. Although even in the offer Stewart is cold in just shaking the coins in front of Jesse with no desire to offer the man friendship, it’s simply a business transaction no more no less. Leading to less of a friendship or partnership as they ride together, Jesse wanting no danger and Stewart presenting only the most annoyed frustrations at the other man’s seemingly cowardly demeanor. 

Stewart reaches his man at the top of a rocky incline who seems to have an ideal position to ward off any attackers, requiring that Howard try some separate way up, however before we can get to that the two men run into a third man, a recently dishonorably discharged cavalry officer and sexual miscreant Roy Anderson (Ralph Meeker), where Stewart can do so much with just a glance and his expression the moment he sees the man’s papers Stewart’s quietly disgusted eyes immediately states just how Howard feels about this guy, despite Roy wanting to immediately help. A physical moment but I think a notable one comes when Howard tries to climb the rocky mound first but stumbles and falls. There’s nothing cool in Stewart’s performance, no humor even in recognizing his stumble, rather there’s fear, embarrassment even, and an unpleasant reaction that would likely reflect most falling in a dangerous situation in front of a random stranger who may or may not be on the level. Leaving instead Roy to climb up it successfully and corner the man who had been dropping rocks from above, leading to the introduction of the man who makes this standout among the Stewart/Mann westerns, Robert Ryan. 

Robert Ryan did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Ben Vandergroat in The Naked Spur. 

Robert Ryan made his career out of playing various fiends, including many that I have covered here including his Oscar nominated prejudiced killer in Crossfire and the sadistic master d’arms in Billy Budd. From the moment we see him onscreen however the nature of this villainous turn from Ryan immediately reveals itself, which Ryan is having a blast with this role. When Roy corners Ben, Ryan turns around not with a grimace but the biggest smile on his face as he greets the man. Ryan is disarming, charming, quite frankly as his delivery is pretty casual as though, unlike Stewart, that everyone is his friend and almost seems to commend the man for getting on the drop for him, though this is the first trick as Ben’s companion Lina (Janet Leigh) sneaks up behind Roy giving Ben a brief chance to make a go of it. Almost being successful until Howard and Jesse make it to the top. Ryan begins to set sail with this performance where he bites into every scene so wonderfully as his whole demeanor as the captured man is defined by that confidence of his nearly ever present smile of a man who has more than a few tricks up his sleeve. His next one being the way he addresses his former acquaintance Howard. 

We get the first face off between Ryan and Stewart which in itself is fascinating as the actor known for playing the heel is so wonderfully warm in his manner, even if subterfuge, compared to the often quite charming Stewart only filled with a quiet rage that only gets stronger in Ryan’s perfectly needling yet so falsely genteel way of addressing Howard as “Howie” like they’re former best buds. Instantly challenging the setup as Ryan with glee lets everyone know he has a large bounty on his head and that Howard not only isn't a lawman he’s also in it for the money. Which gets to the crux of this film, and common to Mann westerns which while they are certainly evil, most everyone is a shade of grey, some stronger than others. In this instance not even the often heroic Stewart is a pure hero here. As we see Stewart face down not only Ben but also the two other men who worked with him to arrest him, and Stewart’s eyes are as intense towards them as Ben. There’s a viciousness to him that is wholly distinct within Stewart’s presence within these westerns, particularly this one as Stewart shows that calculation of potentially killing everyone to keep the money for himself, before coming down from that extreme. A process that Stewart for a moment suggests is easy and brings that genuine darkness into the moment for technically our hero. 

Howard is forced to take Ben in with the other two men splitting things three ways, though easier than it sounds as this film shares much with The Treasure of The Sierra Madre as the lure of the financial reward is more than a bit. And that’s where Ryan just runs off with so many moments of this film in presenting the intense deviousness that is Ben in his methods to survive. A performance where frankly he is manipulating everyone constantly. Ryan brilliantly layers his performance though as we have that surface smile where he is trying to disarm everyone. Yet he also essentially constructs a different type for everyone in the party for him to try to get what he wants out of the situation. With Stewart Ryan projects that pestering familiarity that not only denotes a history but also speaks in every delivery the man purposefully tries to push the man’s personal buttons whenever he can. For Jesse Ryan is softer with every expression being with a bit of phony interest in the older man and even a sense of deferment. Ryan’s delivery of his compliments to the old man on his prospecting skills while alluding to potential gold mines somewhere, all as Ryan makes it all look like Ben is genuinely impressed by the guy, though we ought to know better. With Roy, Ben presses his obvious instant obsession with Lina, and Ryan against shifting his expression a little to almost noble in his earnest request that the “good man” watch out for Lina around Howard. Meanwhile Ryan’s so great in his silent reactions where he conveys so effortlessly Ben’s moments of calculation and moments of direction intention just before he makes his various moves throughout the trek to turn him in. 

Stewart I think rightfully lets Ryan just run with the show in his way, presenting effectively and I think quite impressively as the man deferring in the right way. What Stewart does is reflect the sense of that pressure as Howard not only needs to concern himself with Ben and Lina but also the two other men who are supposed to be his allies. In turn having the moments of hard bitten decision where you just sense the powerful exasperation that defines a man almost tired of the moral lows of others. A state that is only broken when Howard gets shot and in a point of feverish dream where he hallucinates Lina as an old lover of his. Stewart’s remarkable in he has so much weight lifted within his work as we see the old Howard where we also in a way get the classic Stewart, although broken in fever, as the man pledges his promises to a memory. A memory that Ben takes no time in revealing the truth of, where we get an early taste for the truest form of Ben as he so caustically and with a real sadism in every word notes however Howard’s intended not only left him, essentially robbed him of his home. Which in turn becomes a point of exploitation as we see the key relationship of Ben with Lina. Ryan’s fascinating in what he does in his scenes with Leigh, which in no way are the true Ben. Rather Ryan presents an ideal believable Ben, as he desperately pleads with her to help the first time, as a man you can believe, maybe even a good man. The next time though you see more of this devil in disguise as it becomes clear he’s playing her just like the rest as he so earnestly reminds her to use herself as a woman to distract the men, particularly Howard whom she’s made a connection with. 

We get the main scene between Stewart and Leigh, where it is fascinating what Stewart is able to pull off in this moment as basically we see him present Howard potentially believing in humanity again as she shows him empathy. Stewart’s remarkable in the way he goes from a quiet suspicion to easing into some of his considerable charm as they keep speaking, a charm that is quite powerful here because it contrasts so strongly from the coldness before. Stewart doesn’t suddenly become “aw shucks” though as Stewart even in bringing some of his charm still shows an intensity where he is grasping at this hope in a moment almost with the same degree we see him in the moments of violent action, and while I would describe the romance as rushed, Stewart does it best to sell it as drowning man gasping for air. Unfortunately as Ben makes an attempted escape leaving Howard to think it is one more trick and return back to his cynical ways. Where the climax comes as Ben manages to fully trick Jesse into helping him escape with the promise of gold to prospect. When Ben gets the gun from Jesse, Ryan’s instant switch to the real Ben is amazing as he still portrays such joy, but now it is sadistic. I have particularly affection for his reaction for being described as literally devil, as Ryan doesn’t just have Ben accept the title, he owns it with aplomb. Ryan emphasizes the truly psychotic nature as he shoots Jesse down still with the same smile of a man who has no moral qualms whatsoever about killing and showing the true colors so brazenly and brilliantly in his performance. Ryan makes the most out of every second of his performance as Ben, as he makes him a master manipulator throughout, a villain that is just a true magnificent bastard and is simply just so much fun to watch. Which in a way I think is essential, despite being the main villain, as he actually lightens the mood to the right degree by having so much fun. Stewart, while in a way the more thankless position, I think smartly plays into that difference by offering a man basically suffering in this world of amorality. Leading to his final scene where basically he has a choice between Ben’s bounty and potentially a happy life with Lina. There’s just something particularly heartbreaking about Stewart when he of all performers breaks down, because it does feel so raw and fundamental and painful perhaps given he can be such a joyful presence. What Stewart delivers in this moment is the messiness of a man essentially nearly completely losing it, not because he's lost faith, but rather that suddenly there’s this chance to regain it. Stewart delivers the fundamental severity of such a realization and finding a hopeful moment to the end film on, though also a truly painful one. Stewart and Ryan make a great pair here where Stewart offers the tragedy of a man struggling with losing himself to a cruel world, against Ryan as thriving and loving the same cruelty. 
 (Stewart)
(Ryan) 

Tuesday, 5 May 2026

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Charles Boyer in The Earrings of Madame de...

Charles Boyer did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying General André de... in The Earrings of Madame de….

The Earrings of Madame de… follows the possession of the titular earrings of a well to do wife of a General and how their ownership changes the dynamics of her and her husband’s life. 

It’s been quite some time since I’ve covered a Charles Boyer performance, and the only time I’ve covered a Charles Boyer performance where he was speaking in his native French. An actor I’ve always thought had presence but his standout role for me has always been Gaslight because his cold imperious demeanor seemed to fit the manipulative horrible husband of that character. Boyer once again plays a manipulative husband although the situation is quite a bit different here as we follow his relationship with the fairly shallow Madame de… first name Louise (Danielle Darrieux). The opening act follows Louise as she sells her earrings to support her lifestyle while putting on an elaborate act of “losing” them at the theater to convince her husband of such. Honestly throughout this sequence I found Boyer to be the most charming I’ve seen him in anything, not because he presents any sort of great loving husband or anything of that ilk, rather it is the way he presents the General as a man so very much in comfort both with himself and his wife’s approach to life as obviously imperfect as it is. Boyer’s quite a bit of fun as he goes along with the act with the sense that the General has some doubts to begin with and is just having fun playing along with it. One moment particularly worthy of note is a tradeoff with a servant of a man who accuses the General of having stared at his wife. Boyer’s playful delivery of deflecting while also completely admitting to the notion via a compliment of the beauty of the man’s wife before talking with pride of his own is just a wonderful bit of work, and genuinely charming in that very specific ownership of the situation. 

An approach by Boyer that only continues as he learns from their jeweler of his wife’s deceit. Boyer’s reaction though isn’t of any negativity whatsoever, in fact his reaction presents a certain enjoyment of the whole situation. I will admit particular affection for his reaction to his wife bemoaning the loss after he fully knows and Boyer’s exuding this particular joy of someone just loving the game more than anything. An aspect that only continues when the General chooses to give the earrings off to his own departing mistress as a gift. Boyer in that scene brings a playful energy as a man making the gift a bit of a trick of his own. The film then switches its focus more so on the romance between Louise and Baron Fabrizio Donati (Vittorio De Sica). Where the General is just occasionally checked into. Boyer supposedly had arguments with writer/director Max Ophüls over the motivation of the General, and understandably so as the character becomes a bit more enigmatic. Boyer apparently responded by choosing to play his scenes as omnipotent and taking that info manages to make some sense of the General’s switch from being amused by his wife’s actions to becoming a imperious judge against them. Boyer I think does maintain the thread though presenting the General essentially as this force for the social order and less so on a specific personal level. The scene of him pleading for her to maintain the arrangement is less of a desperate or even jealous husband, and more of an authoritarian ruler making quite clear the specific laws of his nation. An idea only extended upon later in the film where he challenges Donati to a duel. Again a scene where Boyer actually doesn’t play it all emotional, and I found his approach even slightly comical as the General speaks around the true infraction in a way. Boyer delivers the scene so rapidly and as a matter-of-fact, as again more so this is a requirement of the society that he make the duel challenge more than this is an emotional man trying to keep his wife. Boyer I think finds an internal logic within the film and his own performance. As much as I think Max Ophüls is the true star of the film, Boyer I think manages to stay present beyond the vision even when working in the vision by finding some genuine entertainment within presenting the General in consistently more satirical terms. 

Wednesday, 29 April 2026

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Jack Hawkins in The Cruel Sea

Jack Hawkins did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite receiving a BAFTA nomination, for portraying LT. Commander George Ericson in The Cruel Sea. 

The Cruel Sea takes a realistic approach of a single crew going through World War II. 

If that role sounds primed for Jack Hawkins, the man required to be in every epic during a certain period, you would be correct. This very much is mostly in his more expected wheelhouse just in the lead role, although just barely as the film very much focuses on several members of the crew to get a wider scope of how this life impacts the men. Hawkins provides his presence to the role of a British officer with the innate strength you’d want, and fitting to the most seasoned man called to deck. Hawkins often must fulfill those needs with delivery of his orders with that regal voice of his and with a quiet confidence about a man who knows what he’s doing. That is the set-up however that isn’t all there is to the film or his portrayal of Ericson, though Hawkins certainly does well in filling that Naval uniform so to speak. The film though is trying to be realistic so this isn’t at all about the glory of the navy, and I would say Hawkins is good because even when he’s in his most official capacity he’s not emphasizing any “rah rah” quality, just a man being professional. 

The film gets much darker when the men come across British men in the water but also know there is a German U-boat below the surface. Hawkins is good in this scene where his eyes do capture essentially the cruel but needed calculation of the man as he understands the gravity of his choice yet then proceeds to calmly order that the boat proceed to attack. When he’s called a murderer, even though Ericson had no choice lest their ship also be destroyed, Hawkins’s reaction takes that as truth even as he continues but still maintaining a veneer of indifference to maintain himself as the proper commander. We have a followup scene where Ericson confides his first officer his true heartbeat over the scene, and I’d say Hawkins is good in the scene, but I can’t help but admit I think he’s better in a short, yet very similar scene, in the end of The Bridge on the River Kwai where he also must justify his sacrificial action. There I truly felt the emotion, here I think Hawkins presents it well, certainly delivers on the needs of the moment, but his performance didn’t impact me to the degree of his later work. 

We follow the ship as it has its own destruction where Hawkins again has a good scene where he is recovered with the few remaining crew delivering genuine fear in his expression and conveying the severity of the situation. We follow that even with a personal note of the unfaithfulness of his wife where Hawkins delivers an effective bit of quiet exasperation, where he does care but has been through too much to care all that deeply. Hawkins shows instead the focus of the man now on his job where we have his pivotal scene of becoming obsessed that there is a German U-Boat even though all signs suggest otherwise. Hawkins is good in this scene in managing to portray this dancing on the line in his intensity between determination and paranoia. Hawkins plays around on the note effectively in the build up before he is proven to be right and once again saves the day in less than typically heroic circumstances. Hawkins gives a good performance here, but I will say, along with some of his other leading turns I’ve seen. There is something missing. Don’t get me wrong, he’s good in those other turns, he’s good here, but the weird thing is he weirdly feels like he has a greater presence…when in supporting roles. And it might just be that strange intangible of what makes a star a star, as Hawkins is good, has a strong presence, yet as a leading man, he’s just not quite as gripping as when he comes in and out of a film. 

Saturday, 25 April 2026

Alternate Best Actor 1953

And the Nominees Were Not:

Chishū Ryū in Tokyo Story

Charles Boyer in The Earrings of Madame de...

Jack Hawkins in The Cruel Sea

James Stewart in The Naked Spur

Kazuo Hasegawa in Gate of Hell

Monday, 6 October 2014

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Results

5. Montgomery Clift in I Confess- Clift gives a solid performance that always remains true to his character even if I wish it was a little less overshadowed by the plot.

Best Scene: Father Logan confronts the murderer.
4. Marlon Brando in The Wild One- Brando's performance is mostly repetitive but fitting for his character, and the few moments where he breaks the mold are quite effective.

Best Scene: Johnny runs from the mob.
3. Glenn Ford in The Big Heat- Ford might not reach the heights that the role seems to offer, but he still gives a fairly striking subversion of his usual decent average man type of character.

Best Scene: Bannion confronts the murderer.
2. Masayuki Mori in Ugetsu- Mori's performance is somewhat limited but good in portraying every moment of his character's rather odd journey.

Best Scene: Genjuro reunites with his "wife". 
1. James Mason in Julius Caesar- Good predictions Luke, JackiBoyz, and Kevin. Mason gives a powerful performance bringing such poignancy to his depiction of a man who stands by his convictions no matter how dark of a place they bring him to.
 
Best Scene: Brutus stabs Caesar.
Overall Rank:
  1. Montgomery Clift in From Here to Eternity
  2. James Mason in Julius Caesar
  3. Chishū Ryū in Tokyo Story
  4. James Stewart in The Naked Spur 
  5. James Mason in Charade
  6. Burt Lancaster in From Here to Eternity 
  7. Masayuki Mori in Ugetsu
  8. Charles Boyer in The Earrings of Madame de….
  9. Masayuki Mori in Love Letter 
  10. Clifton Webb in Titanic   
  11. Charles Vanel in The Wages of Fear
  12. Yves Montand in The Wages of Fear
  13. Hans Conried in Peter Pan 
  14. Trevor Howard in The Heart of the Matter  
  15. Glenn Ford in The Big Heat
  16. Marlon Brando in The Wild One
  17. Montgomery Clift in I Confess
  18. James Mason in The Man Between 
  19. Lars Ekborg in Summer With Monika 
  20. Eitaro Ozawa in Ugetsu
  21. Charles Winninger in The Sun Shines Bright
  22. Jack Hawkins in The Cruel Sea 
  23. Alan Ladd in Shane 
  24. Vincent Price in House of Wax 
  25. Gregory Peck in Roman Holiday 
  26. Richard Widmark in Pickup on South Street 
  27. Arturo de Córdova in El
  28. Louis Jourdan in Rue de l’estrapade 
  29. Fred Astaire in The Band Wagon  
  30. David Niven in The Moon is Blue 
  31. Fredric March in Man on A Tightrope 
  32. Laurence Olivier in The Beggar's Opera 
  33. Charlton Heston in The President's Lady 
  34. Alec Guinness in The Captain's Paradise 
  35. Åke Grönberg in Sawdust and Tinsel 
  36. Kazou Hasegawa in Gate of Hell  
  37. William Tallman in The Hitch-Hiker 
  38. Van Heflin in Shane 
  39. Niall MacGinnis in Martin Luther
  40. Howard Keel in Kiss Me Kate 
  41. Jack Palance in Man in the Attic
  42. John Wayne in Hondo 
  43. Raf Vallone in Thérèse Raquin
  44. Jacques Tati in Monsieur Hulot's Holiday 
  45. Richard Burton in The Desert Rats 
  46. Edmond O'Brien in The Hitch-Hiker 
  47. William Holden in The Moon is Blue
  48. Spencer Tracy in The Actress
  49. Stewart Granger in All The Brothers Were Valiant 
  50. Tyrone Power in The Mississippi Gambler 
  51. Richard Widmark in Take the High Ground 
  52. Michael Wilding in Torch Song 
  53. Frank Lovejoy in The Hitch-Hiker 
  54. Kenneth Moore in Genevieve 
  55. Bobby Driscoll in Peter Pan
  56. Clark Gable in Mogambo  
  57. Bud Abbott in A & C meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
  58. Lou Costello in A & C meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
  59. Dean Martin in The Caddy 
  60. Max Showalter in Niagara 
  61. John Gregson in Genevieve 
  62. Edmond O'Brien in The Bigamist 
  63. Robert Taylor in All The Brothers Were Valiant 
  64. Richard Burton in The Robe
  65. Cary Grant in Dream Wife 
  66. Mel Ferrer in Lili
  67. Stewart Granger in Salome  
  68. Tommy Rettig in The 5000 Fingers of Dr. T 
  69. Gene Barry in The War of the Worlds 
  70. Elroy Hirsch in Crazylegs  
  71. Jerry Lewis in The Caddy 
  72. Robert Wagner in Beneath the 12-Mile Reef 
  73. Robert Taylor in Knights of the Round Table 
  74. Ed Wood in Glen or Glenda
  75. Richie Andrusco in Little Fugitive
  76. John Brown in Robot Monster
  77. George Nader in Robot Monster
  78. John Mylong in Robot Monster
Next Year: 1953 Supporting

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Marlon Brando in The Wild One

Marlon Brando did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Johnny Strabler in The Wild One.

The Wild One is only an okay film about a group of bikers who invade a town causing stuff to happen.

Since it is Marlon Brando we are talking about here his role as Johnny Strabler is merely his least iconic out of his iconic roles. Brando plays the role of a 50's rebel, a 50's rebel being a young man who just seems to have more of a bad attitude rather than honestly fighting for or against something. He rides bikes with his gang who go harass a motorcycle race than proceeds to go harass a town for awhile. Brando plays Johnny in a fairly simple in some way one dimensional fashion, although I don't think he exactly plays his incorrectly by taking this approach. Johnny after all really doesn't have a purpose in his behavior such as when he randomly fights with the leader of another gang or frankly shown directly when asked what he was rebelling against and all Johnny replies is "Whadda you got?". Johnny is less of a rebel and more of just some young guy who just seems to not care about anything.

Brando's performance does work within the confines of his character as his mostly one note takes makes since for the character. Johnny isn't even like James Dean's Rebel without a Cause in that he secretly, or at least not according to what is shown in the film, that suggests he's pained by something in his personal life with family. Johnny on the other hand seems to be more or less content in being a motorcycle punk. Brando's performance therefore mostly depends on his charisma to portray the particular 'cool' of Johnny. Brando certainly is good in doing the understated charisma which works for Johnny. He has the power of personality and he does exude that certain element that would make everyone seem to almost bow before him whether or not they are part of his gang. Although Brando never has that smouldering magnetism that was found in his performance in A Streetcar Named Desire.

Brando's performance stays fairly steady except for a few moments where Johnny hangs out with the local waitress. Brando is fine as he suggests a little depth in Johnny as he pursues her. Brando is good in that he shows Johnny doing it in a half-hearted way as he portrays Johnny trying to hang on his 'cool' even when he is technically caring about something for once. Brando's best moment actually comes late in the film when the two finally turns on the bikers and attack Johnny. After Johnny manages to escape the mob Brando has one great moment where he completely loses the cool. Instead he rather powerfully turns Johnny into just a scared kid for a moment who is both surprised and hurt by suddenly being treated in such a way. That is a fantastic moment as Brando reveals Johnny's attitude to technically be a facade allowed by safety.

After that point Brando brings Johnny back to his normal not caring attitude although he adjusts it just enough to now suggest that he is more actively hiding emotions just underneath the surface. Brando no longer makes it a pure calm but rather a bit of cover as though perhaps Johnny could break down under the wrong circumstances. Unlike most of his other iconic roles this isn't quite a great performance. The character is perhaps a bit too limited and technically Brando's work here is not exactly filled with variety. Brando's approach does work, and his particular charm works for the character. Also the three dimensionality he does managed to infuse in Johnny comes out naturally and does make for some fairly poignant moments come from a character who simply could have been obnoxious.

Sunday, 5 October 2014

Alternate Best Actor 1953: James Mason in Julius Caesar

James Mason did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Brutus in Julius Caesar.

Julius Caesar is an effective adaptation of Shakespeare's play about Julius Caesar's assassination and the results of it.

Although Marlon Brando was Oscar nominated for lead for the film is was much more of supporting in the role of Marc Antony although he certainly makes a strong impact with his relatively limited screen time. Mason plays the true lead of the story of Brutus who is one of the chief conspirators against Caesar, but it is notable that he also is Caesar's friend.  The first act of the story focuses on Brutus as he decides and eventually prepares for the assassination of Caesar who has been seen as having become tyrannical. Mason, despite technically playing a conspirator in a coup, portrays Brutus in a fairly straight forward fashion. This might seem an inconsistency but Mason technically takes the right approach for his Brutus. Brutus is the only man with power who actually does what he believes is best for Rome unlike all of his other compatriots and even Marc Antony who show far darker shade of themselves after the assassination takes place.

Mason takes that approach and is quite good in taking this approach. Although Brutus's speeches come later in the film Brutus is fairly reactionary at first as he listens to the other conspirators who are trying to convince him to come to their way of thinking. Mason even when not having the showy performance at a particular moment knows how to carefully makes his impact in these scenes. Mason is excellent in every reaction of Brutus as the time moves closer to the assassination and more men reveal their plans. Mason conveys conflict brilliantly in his expression as he portrays Brutus as seemingly always calculating every element involved with the plot while still carrying a certain emotional volatility reinforcing the idea of how dear Caesar was towards Brutus. Mason expresses the differing thoughts in Brutus of the situation quite effectively as he portrays the pressure in him as he seems to be trying to find what is truly the right thing to do.

Where the other conspirators are all portrayed with a certain level of deviousness Mason appropriately shows not the slightest hint of it in his portrayal of Brutus, and we all know Mason's a man who knows how to be devious. When Brutus decides to take part in the assassination of Caesar Mason does not portray Brutus as a man seeking power or in some way lusting for violence. No instead Mason carries himself with a very specific passion in these scenes. In Mason's eyes he presents no evil rather a drive to do what he believes is necessary to prevent Caesar from destroying Rome through his growing tyrannical attitude. Mason makes Brutus a truly righteous man in his manner and there is never a doubt that Brutus is the most virtuous man in the film. Mason earns his place by making Brutus the honorable man he should be by showing that in every step of the assassination that Brutus understands the gravity of it.

The assassination scene itself is fantastic scene for Mason as the men go over one more issue with Caesar as the men all take their positions to murder the man. Mason is great in the moment as Brutus asks Caesar to reconsider the issue as Mason shows the dire need in Brutus to try to reach Caesar even if one can see the same futility in his expression as the men approach from behind Caesar to end his life. Mason is particularly effective in the important moment where Caesar literally asks him if Brutus as well is part of the betrayal. Brutus rather bluntly confirms this by stabbing Caesar once more. Mason does not portray this action as the same way the other seem to stab with a certain maliciousness. Mason instead continues to portray the conflict in Brutus even in this moment as Mason expresses still a dismay at betraying one he loved and respected even while he must fulfill his own perceived duty by killing the man.

After the assassination Brutus must attempt to explain his actions to a volatile crowd and it is interesting to compare Mason's performance from Brando's speech that comes right afterwards. Mason's portrayal is far less intense than Brando's but this actually makes sense because Brutus is trying to calm the crowd not rouse them in anger. Mason in this way is equally effective in portraying Brutus's equally impassioned yet far calmer speech to the crowd. Mason keeps his emotions more focused on point as he shows Brutus's speech to be one of more of a politician pleading for understanding opposed to the hellfire preached soon afterwards by Antony. Mason carries himself with the necessary command in the scene and makes it believable that Brutus would be able to calm the crowd for the moment. It's a great scene and technically slightly thankless in that he does technically allow Brando to showboat, but Mason's humble approach is the approach that works best for the story.

Antony's speech forces Brutus and his allies into a war in which it seem they will likely lose. Mason still keeps Brutus as a righteous man in his steadfast approach to even confronting his closest allies if their is corruption in the ranks. Mason in this later scenes though is very moving in portraying a slowly growing grief in Brutus as he sees all his dreams fade to nothing in his losing crusade and things are only made worse by learning that his wife has died. Mason does not necessarily portray Brutus as being filled with regret or remorse, but rather as a man being forced toward a doom. Mason shows Brutus as a man who's true passion, the preservation of the Roman republic, to ever wain although he brilliantly undercuts in reflecting the way he is being torn apart by not only the killing of Caesar, but all the other tragedies that have come to him. Mason is heartbreaking as he makes Brutus's final fate a natural progression of a man who technically never lost his way.

Saturday, 4 October 2014

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Masayuki Mori in Ugetsu

Masayuki Mori did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Genjuro in Ugetsu.

Ugetsu becomes a rather haunting tale of two men attempting to change their lives during a war.
 
Masayuki Mori is a bit of the Japanese Chameleon as far as I can tell as I have failed to recognize him as the same man in his performances such as the corrupt businessman in The Bad Sleep Well, the quiet "fool" in The Idiot (A performance and film I very much ought to reexamine), or the bitter shades of a samurai from Rashomon. Mori once again seems like a wholly different individual as Genjuro who technically is a fairly average guy not really that much different than Ken Ogata's character in The Ballad of Narayama. Genjuro is a bit a different though unlike Ogata's character who was content enough with his hardship as a peasant Genjuro has an ambition to become rich through his pottery business. It's technically made even worse that both he and his neighbor in a way see the war raging around them as a chance for their own personal gain.

Mori is quite good in the role by portraying Genjuro having a bit of a simple charm in the role. He does particularly well in regards to showing Genjuro's various ideas about being rich even as their village is threatened by violent soldiers. Mori doesn't portray Genjuro's ambition as some sort of unshakeable drive in his personality, but rather presents it as something far more down to earth as well as fitting to an average man like Genjuro. Mori shows both the greed and the ambition to be pretty simple fitting the simple man as he is as just the search for the pleasure the money will bring. There is no scheming or grand ideas in his eyes instead Mori is quite good, almost like a game show contestant, in portraying this particular sort of desire. Mori handles this well because he manages to be endearing in the role even though Genjuro begins to do some rather reprehensible things.

Genjuro eventually leaves his wife and son, supposedly for their own safety, as leaves with his friend, who is ever worse in his own dream of becoming a samurai, and heads off to sell his pottery for a great profit. While there Genjuro comes across a strange alluring woman who seems to be oddly interested in him. At this point in the film Mori's performance mostly reactionary in nature as Genjuro allows himself to be manipulated by this odd woman and her servant. Mori does not get to do all that much but he's actually quite good in his depiction of Genjuro being pulled into this odd world the woman seems to inhabit. Mori's performance works especially well in tandem with the film's direction. It creates this otherworldly scene and Mori does well to amplify that through his reaction as Genjuro. Mori portrays a true astonishment and entrancement as he is brought into the woman's house and eventually seduced by her. 

Masayuki Mori's performance is always consistent and allows the moments to play out well by always showing Genjuro to act as most normal man would in his situation. The ending of the film is very powerful and poignant and Mori aids in this. He always makes the situations feel real in the world allowing every revelation to have the needed impact. The moment where Genjuro believes he's met his wife again is moving as Mori portrays just a honest happiness at finding his old life again. He makes it all the more heartbreaking when things turn out differently than they appeared as Mori portrays Genjuro's sadness in such an unassuming yet so perfectly tender. This is a very good performance from Mori, and I have to give credit for once again disappearing in a role. 

Friday, 3 October 2014

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Glenn Ford in The Big Heat

Glenn Ford did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Det. Sgt. Dave Bannion in The Big Heat.

The Big Heat is a rather effective film noir about a detective who will get to the bottom of the murder despite rampant corruption around him, and threatens to his life and family. 

Glenn Ford is not the greatest leading man from the period as some of his performances can be a bit bland, and he does not exactly have the most range as an actor. In the Big Heat it appears as though this will be fairly standard Ford type of performance as the film opens. That being the devoted man with a loving family but dealing with some tough issues like his roles in Trial and The Blackboard Jungle. It is a fairly good example of it though as Ford has enough charm and likability in his scenes with his family. In the scenes of the early investigation Ford is also wholly solid in showing the straight method of Bannion as he goes about his task. He brings the right underlying passion in his portrayal of Bannion drive but is careful to show that at the end of the day Bannion still seems to be a man who's merely doing his job, although definitely determined to it to the best of his ability.

Of course everything is suddenly turned on his head when the gangsters who were behind the murder make an attempt on Bannion's life. Bannion is not harmed but the gangsters accidentally kill someone very close to the man instead. It is interesting as the film turns the usual Ford character on his head as Bannion has to deal with this death and it changes from the upstanding cop he was before. Bannion instead turns into a much darker character than before and it is rather fascinating to see Ford handle the role at this point. It's a bit more of stretch for him and Ford breaks apart his usual performance in a rather effective fashion. He pretty much drops the average guy charm instead giving a far more withdrawn portrayal as he conveys the way that Bannion seems to be now consumed by his desire for revenge.

Glenn Ford changes from the Glenn Ford style hero to a far more hard bitten type of detective more in the style of Robert Mitchum or Kirk Douglas. He does so in a rather convincing manner actually and gives a strong portrayal of Bannion as he is more interested technically in causing suffering for those who wrong him than simply upholding the law. Ford portrays it almost a sort of madness in Bannion as he seems to be almost wholly bent to the idea of revenge without being able to think of much else. He carries himself with a certain intensity at all times portraying Bannion, although in the right, as in a way lost to his own hatred. The only time Ford expresses a different side to Bannion is when must recall the one he lost. Ford makes these scenes rather poignant without making them seemed forced showing them as though he is remembering the good rather than experiencing it.

This is a good performance by Glenn Ford and he effectively leads the film noir quite well. He manages to break the mold of his usual standard sort of performance and is fairly striking in taking this more daring approach with work. I will be blunt when I say this is not quite a great performance though as Ford is not quite a great actor. He is indeed a decent one, and this is easily the best performance I have seen from him. Now having said that I do this Bannion as a character had potential for a truly great performance and one could easily see that if it were indeed in the hands of someone like Kirk Douglas, Robert Mitchum or maybe Ray Milland. Ford never quite reaches the heights one would imagine were possible for the role, but even so it is really a solid performance that still realizes his character rather well.

Thursday, 2 October 2014

Alternate Best Actor 1953: Montgomery Clift in I Confess

Montgomery Clift did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Father Michael William Logan in I Confess.

I Confess is a decent enough, albeit not particularly thrilling film from Alfred Hitchcock, about a priest hearing a murder in confession while later being suspected of that murder.

Montgomery Clift plays a very different from Private Prewitt in From Here to Eternity as he plays the unassuming priest Father Logan. They do share one strong similarity in that they are both men of an intense moral conviction. Prewitt refused to fight in the Captain's boxing team, despite constant harassment for doing so, and Logan refuses to break his vows as a Catholic priest to reveal what was told to him. Technically Clift could have taken the exact same approach for both Logan and Prewitt but it is interesting to see how Clift approaches Logan in a different fashion. Although obviously hearing the confession of the murder obviously bothers him for obvious reasons, even before he is being suspected of the murder, Clift does not portray Logan's conviction in causing him any personal pain rather he uses this to show the nature of Logan as a priest.

Clift portrays Father Logan as a man who has absolute belief in the sacred nature of the confession and therefore there is never a doubt in his mind about not speaking about the confession. Clift is very good in every scene where Logan is pressed for any information associated with the confession only to speak in a way that in no way alludes to anything being held secret. Clift suggests merely the purity of the man's conviction as he keeps Logan's demeanor matter of fact as he refuses to divulge any information about the confession. It technically would probably be tempting to portray some strong internal struggle in the character but Clift stays true to the character by just carrying a pronounced sense of duty in his manner in these scenes. Clift continues to take a seemingly unorthodox approach to the other aspects of the role as well particularly in regards to the past romance that Logan had with a woman before he became a priest.

Logan technically forces himself to be even more quiet about the murderer because he was a blackmailer of his old flame (Anne Baxter), and Logan in no way wants to harm her reputation. Clift again is very much true to his character as a good priest above else. Even in the scenes where she declares her undying love for Logan Clift is very careful in his reaction. Clift is quite effective in showing that Logan's feelings for her have diminished long ago in favor of his devotion to the priesthood. Clift treads quite a fine line in that on one side he makes it clear that Logan no longer shares his sentiments and portrays an understanding of that without being overly warm yet still avoiding presenting Logan as an emotionally cold man. Clift finds the right balance that always feels right for the self-sacrificing character that is Father Logan. Clift simply never cheats the character and creates the selfless nature of the man in an honest and affecting fashion.

Although Clift is lead the film spends a considerable amount of time with Baxter's character or with Karl Malden detective who is slowly building the case against Father Logan. The film never quite bothers to choose if it wants to be a character driven piece on the Father or a more traditional Hitchcock thriller suffering due to that. Clift's performance is forced to be particularly reactive in nature, but he manages to create a fairly powerful portrait of this man through this. The end of the film is especially striking because of Clift's work in the way he so wonderfully realizes the selfless nature of Father Logan. As he stands accused of murder, and considered guilty by many even before the trail begins. Clift reactions are consistently effective in showing the way Father Logan quietly seems to almost absorb the responsibility of the situation. It's poignant soulful work from him here and I only wish the film was not quite so confined by the progression of the plot.

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

Alternate Best Actor 1953

And the Nominees Were Not:

Masayuki Mori in Ugetsu

Glenn Ford in The Big Heat

James Mason in Julius Caesar

Montgomery Clift in I Confess

Marlon Brando in The Wild One