Showing posts with label 1936 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1936 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts

Sunday, 10 May 2015

Alternate Best Actor 1936: Results

5. Spencer Tracy in Fury - Tracy is charming and moving in his depiction of a man wrongly facing death, but he plays the second half too much like a villain.

Best Scene: Embracing Rainbow.
4. Jean Gabin in The Lower Depths - Gabin gives an enjoyable portrayal of a charismatic thief which effectively matches the tone of this version of the story.

Best Scene: His first meeting with the Baron.
3. Charlie Chaplin in Modern Times - Chaplin gives a very entertaining and rather wonderful sendoff to his most famous creation.

Best Scene: The Ending.
2. Charles Laughton in Rembrandt - Even with the film's rather swift pace Laughton gives a remarkable portrayal of the famous painter throughout his life's journey. 

Best Scene: Rembrandt attempts to paint his wife one last time.
1. Edward Arnold in Come And Get It - Good Predictions RatedRStar, Michael McCarthy and Luke. The underrated Edward Arnold is given the chance to depict the origins of one of his rich and powerful men, and does not waste that chance. He gives a heartbreaking performance that realizes what such a man might sacrifice to earn that power.

Best Scene:  The Ending.
Overall Rank:
  1. Edward Arnold in Come And Get It 
  2. Charles Laughton in Rembrandt
  3. Charlie Chaplin in Modern Times
  4. Walter Huston in Dodsworth 
  5. William Powell in After The Thin Man
  6. Jean Gabin in The Lower Depths 
  7. William Powell in My Man Godfrey
  8. William Powell in The Great Ziegfeld
  9. Leslie Howard in The Petrified Forest
  10. Clark Gable in San Francisco
  11. Warner Baxter in The Prisoner of Shark Island
  12. Errol Flynn in The Charge of the Light Brigade
  13. Gary Cooper in Mr. Deeds Goes to Town
  14. James Cagney in Great Guy
  15. Boris Karloff in The Invisible Ray
  16. C. Aubrey Smith in Little Lord Fauntleroy
  17. Oskar Homolka in Sabotage
  18. Fred Astaire in Swing Time
  19. Freddie Bartholomew in Little Lord Fauntleroy
  20. Fred Astaire in Follow the Fleet
  21. Paul Muni in The Story of Louis Pasteur 
  22. John Gielgud in Secret Agent
  23. Roland Young in The Man Who Could Work Miracles
  24. Gary Cooper in The General Died At Dawn
  25. Fred MacMurray in The Trail of the Lonesome Pine
  26. Spencer Tracy in Fury
  27. Jack Hayley in Pigskin Parade
  28. Henry Fonda in The Trail of the Lonesome Pine
  29. Fredric March in Anthony Adverse
  30. Robert Taylor in Camille 
  31. John Loder in Sabotage
  32. Leslie Howard in Romeo and Juliet
  33. Kenneth Craig in Reefer Madness
Next Year: 1936 Supporting

Alternate Best Actor 1936: Charles Laughton in Rembrandt

Charles Laughton did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn in Rembrandt.

Rembrandt is a fine biographical film about the famous painter, my only major complaint would be that it probably should have been longer.

Rembrandt is the second biographical film directed by Alexander Korda starring Charles Laughton. The first was The Private Life of Henry VIII, for which Laughton won his only Oscar. Rembrandt is far lesser known film of the two, I imagine mostly because of Henry's Oscar recognition, although they technically follow a similar formula. Both examine the life of the two famous individuals mainly through their romantic relationships. Rembrandt opens very near the death of his wife, just as Henry opened near the death of Anne Boleyn Henry's second wife, although the nature of the deaths could not be more different. The men also could not be more different and it is interesting to see Laughton take on this role. In the early scenes of the film Laughton presents Rembrandt as very specifically the great artist. After all why should he not be seen as such considering he's quite successful as well as has a happy personal life with his wife and son. Laughton carries himself in a very particular way that accentuates just how much of a genius Rembrandt is, and the reason for this is his successes allow him to behave in this way. Laughton's excellent though in that he brings a certain pompousness of his artistic ideas, yet he still manages to make it seem rather earned by the man.

Laughton captures a merited greatness of the man as the words he speaks do seem to have depth and meaning even though he technically speaking might be a bit indulgent in his approach. Laughton importantly does not make this seem an intentional instead he creates this man who has almost risen to a higher echelon of thinking. This can't last forever though when Rembrandt's wife suddenly dies. Laughton is incredibly effective in realizes the way the death changes Rembrandt as he has been thrown off his pedestal by being hit with the cruelty of reality. Laughton is very good in realizing the unique sort of grief in Rembrandt as he deals with the death. He does not play it as an overt sadness but says so much through the way the man withdraws somewhat. There is one especially powerful moment where Rembrandt shows just how much he cared for his wife by attempting to draw one more portrait of her even though he no longer has her there to model for him. Laughton is quite moving as he portrays Rembrandt last moments of holding onto his wife until her image fades from his mind forever. Onward, even after his grieving period, he is still unable to find his former self, not at all helped by his son's wet nurse, his first mistress, who seems to demand her position as such due to having put her time in, more than because she truly loves Rembrandt.

Rembrandt's work in particular changes and Laughton projects a rougher personality altogether. In a scene where he has to deal with some unhappy costumers who did not care for his portrait of them, Laughton is terrific in bringing a strong incisiveness to Rembrandt as he bluntly states what he dislikes about the men without hesitate. Laughton is great in bringing a certain vicious bitterness in Rembrandt as now he seems to place himself above others, but does not hesitate to remind them of this fact now. At the same time though Laughton brings a certain earthy quality in these scenes as though Rembrandt is more aware of the world he exists in, the fact that he's far less successful as artist does not seem to hurt. There is one particularly good scene where Rembrandt goes back to his family in the country and has to deal with the locals. There dynamic that Laughton strikes up that is rather brilliant. He projects Rembrandt taking in the local color as one of them with a certain joy, yet he still brings his artistic flourishes that keeps him a distance. Every once in a while Rembrandt will make a quote, which every time Laughton delivers in a flawless and beautiful fashion that so well suggests the man's artistry without showing him creating a panting.

Rembrandt continues in his problematic dueling natures until he meets a different potential mistress his maid played by Elsa Lanchester. The real life husband wife had shared the screen as at least potential lovers in Henry VIII, but their relationship basically amounted to a comic bit. This time though the relationship is taken far more seriously. Laughton and Lanchester have inherent warmth in their scenes together and do quite well to show exactly how this relationship differs from Rembrandt's previous mistress. The relationship has many difficulties though as he is unable to marry her due to his wife's will, and the public looks down upon their unwed status leaving her to become excommunicated. In these scenes Laughton very gradually brings Rembrandt perhaps to his best point as a man and as artist as he finally seems to start to find contentment in his life and his work. Laughton brings back a joy to life in Rembrandt, but without even the distance he created in the early scenes. Instead Laughton very effectively brings Rembrandt to the point where he finally seems to fully understand his place in the world and how to find happiness within it. What is perhaps most notable his transformation throughout is that technically it is all a bit rushed by the film's swift pace, yet Laughton never stumbles in fact making it seem as though Rembrandt's life story is not rushed at all.  This is a tremendous performance by Laughton as he so well realizes every moments of this journey through his complex depiction of this remarkable man.

Friday, 8 May 2015

Alternate Best Actor 1936: Charlie Chaplin in Modern Times

Charlie Chaplin did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying a factory worker in Modern Times.

Modern Times is a delightful semi-silent comedy about the struggle to live in an industrial society.

The way Modern Times is set up it can almost be looked upon as an origin for his tramp character since at the beginning of the film he is an employed factory worker. Well it's safe to say much hijinks will ensue, as it does from the first scene where the worker fails to maintain the assembly line as it simply becomes faster and faster. Chaplin's comic approach here is rather simple in that he plays every scene with a certain naivety with the worker. There is an enthusiasm about him in that he seems to want to try his best, but that probably means he's just going to screw up anyways. Chaplin's enthusiasm he brings in the improbable task is particularly enjoyable to watch. Chaplin adds a bit of extra comedy in this case though in that he gives a bit of "realism" in his worker as he has to deal with the line, as well as a torturous feeding machine, since he portrays the life wearing down the working to the point that he breakdown mentally. Of course this is all in good fun and most importantly quite funny.

The worker continues his transition to the tramp really by first endings up in the hospital after losing his job, then immediately finding himself in prison. What Modern Times is technically made up of is the worker failing at one thing from another. Whether it is failing not to get arrested by accidentally being mistaken for a communist organizer, or even failing at prison by thwarting a prison escape due to having mistakenly ingesting some cocaine.  To be honest this whole setup seems like something that could become repetitive considering it is basically the same thing over and over again. Well Chaplin as a director and actor keeps it ever feeling as such. Chaplin no matter what brings such energy to every single one of the situation and never does it feel as though he will ever let a setup go half-baked. He's there to sell every bit to its fullest and here is quite good in bringing a certain variation to his reactions to the setups even though the idea behind each is basically the same.

Chaplin here also does rather quietly formulate into the Tramp character in that he bridges the worker of the first scenes who goes through the hardships of mental breakdowns and prisons to eventually become the bum he was always meant to be. Although of course that bum still tries his hand a various jobs always managing to goof them up in one way or another, and usually in ways that are quite humorous to be sure. Again the whole set up, since many of the mistakes made by the Tramp that either get him fired or in jail or both are usually his own fault. This could make the character become annoying but it never does because of how endearing Chaplin really makes the worker who has become the tramp. I suppose it should also be noted that the Tramp does actually speak here, although only in a musical number that is pure gibberish. Like pretty much everything that Chaplin does in the film it is a very entertaining moment, and kinda sums up the Tramp character since you still can't hear what it is that he saying yet you completely understand what he means.

With Chaplin it never is purely about the laughs, even if those are in abundance as they are here, but the comedy is never without a heart. That element is particularly strong in Modern Times well founded through the Tramp's relationship with a girl in similar circumstances only known as a Gamin played by Paulette Goddard. Chaplin and Goddard are wonderful together as there is such a strong warmth that comes out of even the tiniest interaction they share. One could not ask for a sweeter couple to follow in the film with Chaplin's shy little smile, and Goddard brightly shining grin that might be one of the cutest imaginable. Their relationship though is not simply about the joy they share together but as well as the hardship, which is what perhaps makes Modern Times just so special. They are incredibly moving together in their moments of failing as everything seems to go wrong for them, even after it seems like things go right, and the sadness of each defeat is palatable despite being funny when it happened initially. There is always resilience in the pair with that final unforgettable moment where Chaplin presents still such a beautiful tenderness as the Tramp encourages her to keep going on even when things look at their worst. This is a marvelous performance that is a worthy sendoff for perhaps the most iconic character in cinematic history.

Thursday, 7 May 2015

Alternate Best Actor 1936: Edward Arnold in Come and Get It

Edward Arnold did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Barney Glasgow in Come and Get It.

Edward Arnold most often played the rich and the powerful and he once again plays such a man in Come and Get It. There is a difference in this case, well other than that Arnold is the lead in the film, in that here we actually are given a view of how he earns his position in society, unlike his appearances in Frank Capra picture where he apparently lost his heart long ago. In this film we are first introduced to Arnold's Barney where he is the head of a crew of lumberjacks. Arnold does something important in these scenes because the film really does not do much to age him in terms of makeup between the twenty year gap of the story, which is to convey the youth of the character. There is the enthusiastic spirit of a younger man projected through Arnold's performance as he expression very specifically the fun that Barney is having as he works with his crew in the woods. The love of life seems to be simply a part of him as Arnold so well brings across the idea of a man ready and willing to live life to its fullest at this moment. Of course within these scenes though we are also given sight for once how an Edward Arnold character gets to become the rich and powerful man he is.

Arnold is very effective in portraying the ambition of the man in his performance as well. Although he's clearly having a good time there is always a certain intent that Arnold gets across well. In the dealings that Barney is making, in order for his jobs to propel him forward in terms of riches, Arnold brings a needed command in his manner. Arnold realizes the power of personality in Barney in these scenes particularly well as a man who would be able to scale the world to become the powerful man he desires to be. What Arnold does so incredibly well in these scenes though is that he in no way plays it as some sort of evil brewing in Barney. Instead Arnold is very good in bringing even an idea of a nobility of sorts in the act. Arnold does not portray it as though Barney is a thief taking away from others, but rather a man completely fulfilling his own desires through his own abilities. This is particularly great work from Arnold here in that you can see technically speaking perhaps the beginnings of so man of the characters he played. We always see him after he's a man of riches and power, but he we actually are given the journey. Arnold makes the most of this and actually earns the riches so to speak by believably showing us the rise to power.

Just before his rise is basically complete Barney decides to party with his best friend Swan (Walter Brennan) at a questionable bar where he meets the saloon singer Lotta (Frances Farmer). Arnold brings such a surprising yet genuine sweetness in the scene. This is especially important though given that the romance between Barney and Lotta is really the crux of the film yet it is only set up in technically a few scenes. Arnold though manages to make it work through his portrayal of Barney's love for Lotta. There is the more obvious and understandable immediate infatuation, but Arnold gives it more depth than a mere lust in the man. Arnold is excellent in the way he brings a certain tenderness and most necessary and understanding in the moments between Lotta and Barney. Arnold manages to make it work to the point that it manages to overcome the brevity of the scenes as he realizes the romance as something special. This is very needed since Barney has already decided to marry a different woman who would further allow him to advance in terms of his position. The honesty that Arnold brings to Barney's relationship with Lotta effectively creates the tragedy behind Barney's decision to favor wealth over love. This leads Barney to take off without a word to Lotta, and leads to the film's twenty year flash forward.

This section begins with Glasgow's family at breakfast with Barney being referred to in an excessively formal way by his wife. We meet Barney as the man he technically wished to become and Arnold now fits into the role he most often played. Well there was a reason for that because Arnold was good at it as he so well personifies a man defined by his wealth. Arnold though with this does show what has happened to Barney. That old enthusiasm is gone, and there is still an ambition of sort though much colder without that energy of the old days. In his relationship with his wife, and to a certain degree his son (Joel McCrea) Arnold brings a considerable distance portraying a relationship more based around responsibility than any sort of affection. What I really liked about Arnold's performance though is he does not make Barney irredeemable at this point. In Barney's relationship with his daughter Arnold alludes just every so slightly to the old Barney. Although he still has a coldness as he goes along with his wife's ideas for who his daughter can marry, his interactions with his daughter carry a hint of that old warmth alluding to the fact that the old Barney is not completely dead. This becomes awakened all the more when Barney goes back to see his friend Swan, who married Lotta, and finds Swann's daughter Lotta, with the now deceased Lotta, looks just like her mother, after all she's also played by Frances Farmer.

Arnold is excellent in his portrayal of Barney's relationship with the young Lotta, since it's actually quite tricky. It's easy to see how a lesser actor would have made Barney just seem like a creepy old man, since Barney kinda is. Arnold does not allow it to be so simple with his performance. He portrays an infatuation with her to be sure, but also Arnold brings a certain confusion in the man as though he can't quite comprehend her since it's his past mistake staring at him right in the face. Most remarkably though is the way Arnold brings a greater pathos in the relationship. When he hears her sing in particular Arnold creates such a haunting quality in Barney as Arnold shows him clearly thinking to the past, and the mistake he made. Barney's wealth though essentially allows him to convince Swan and his family to do what he wants, and brings Lotta closer to him. Arnold again is terrific though as he manages to seem far less problematic than it technically is through his performance. Arnold presents Barney as almost being lost in the nostalgia as parts of that youthful spirit appears, and he is attempting to recreate his lost love without exactly realizing it himself. Barney's plan falls apart though when Lotta becomes naturally far more interested in Barney's son than Barney. Barney eventually comes to blows with his son, leaving Lotta to save Barney from being hurt by his son by reminding him that Barney is an old man. Arnold reaction is perfection as Barney dream shatters in a moment, and Arnold shows that Barney finally realizes that he will never be able to relive the past. Arnold's in his last scene portrays Barney being emotionally overwhelmed by finally understanding what he has lost, and is heartbreaking in his depiction of Barney knowing he has wasted his life.

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

Alternate Best Actor 1936: Jean Gabin in The Lower Depths

Jean Gabin did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Pepel Wasska in The Lower Depths.

The Lower Depths is Jean Renoir's effective adaptation of the play about the lives of the denizens of a slum.

The Lower Depths was later adapted by another great director Akira Kurosawa in 1957. The two versions differ greatly in terms of the general tone as well as the focus. Where Kurosawa made it a truly ensemble piece where all the various characters were more or less just as important, Renoir's version tightens the focus upon the thief living in the slum. The other characters are still there, but only have brief moments that are intertwined around the story of the thief Pepel played by Gabin. Again this character is played by the biggest star in the film, as Toshiro Mifune went on to play the character in Kurosawa's version. Gabin's depiction differs quite bit from Mifune, which can be seen from the earliest scenes. Mifune played it as though his thief was really just part of the crowd, that's not quite the case for Gabin's performance. Gabin gives the thief more overt of a style as a thief as he plays the part with a certain suaveness in the way he moves. He's not a low down dirty thief as Mifune played, rather Gabin plays him as a much more of the romanticized sort of thief. Gabin plays the part with a distinct smoothness in his physical manner as well as the way in which he speaks.

Gabin's approach works well with Renoir's approach for the material which is taking a bit of a lighter touch to the material. One of the aspects of this version is that the thief is made essentially to be the protagonist, which he's not in Kurosawa's, and it makes sense for him to be a made more likable do to that. Gabin is very charming here in portraying the thief with a very specific sort of cool that works also to portray the thief as someone who might live in the slum but never intends to be part of it. In addition with the possible murder plot involving the married couple and the thief is handled very differently here. Gabin very specifically shows that Pepel never even gives a second thought to being a murder, and instead plays his scenes with the wife a whole lot differently as well. Gabin does not show any true affection or desire to her but rather just Pepel lightly stringing her along in order for him to improve his circumstances by using her husband as a fence for stolen goods. This as well his thieving is technically amoral, but Gabin is able to get around this by suggesting not even the slightest violent urge in Pepel's heart.

With this different intent in mind Gabin makes Pepel a very endearing thief to watch apply his trade, especially when he goes to rob a baron, the baron does not mind because he has lost everything anyways. Instead they strike up a friendship in the night and Gabin makes this quite believable through just how much charisma he brings to the part. The scene the two share together is rather delightful as Gabin wins him over just as he seems to wins almost everyone over including the audience. Of course the murder plot is still hanging overhead in a way, even if Pepel wants nothing to do with it. This becomes all the more complicated when it becomes obvious to the wife that Pepel is far more interested in her husband's sister Natascha, despite her being quite critical of Pepel's choice of profession. Gabin is very good in the scenes between Pepel and Natascha as he so well reflects essentially the admiration in Pepel for Natashca because of her moral code. Gabin brings a genuine sweetness in these scenes and makes the romance feel natural.

Not everything goes to plan though as eventually a death does occur although in no way is it a murder even though Pepel is technically involved. Gabin is good in this scene though as he in no way expresses any other sort of character change in Pepel just rather plays in an authentic gut sort of reaction of the moment. Unlike the Kurosawa version this film is given much more of an happy ending, even though both do end with a suicide, and this version does not have the darkly funny punchline, but I'm getting off track. This version though does let the thief go so to speak as the thief is allowed to escape the suffering of the lower depths, and is given a far less rough treatment than Mifune's thief. This ending very well might not have worked as it technically can be seen as cheapening the tone of the story. Gabin manages to earn it though simply because he makes Pepel someone you do want to see escape his assumed fate. His performance works his way through any possible problems by charming his way through to the point that you simply want to see the thief walk away into the sunset with the woman he loves.

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

Alternate Best Actor 1936: Spencer Tracy in Fury

Spencer Tracy did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Joe Wilson in Fury.

Fury is a heavy handed although not entirely ineffective film about a man seeking revenge after almost being killed by a lynch mob for a crime he did not commit.

Spencer Tracy plays the role of Joe Wilson who in the first scenes of the film we just meet as a well average Joe. We meet him as Tracy is likable and charming enough in portraying Joe who just wants to live his life. He has a nice enough chemistry with Sylvia Sydney as his fiancee Katherine, and really his biggest issue is telling his brothers to stay a lawful course in passionate way. Eventually Joe is arrested on a misunderstanding and gossip spreads that he must behind a kidnapping. Tracy is effective enough in these scenes in simply portraying the simple confusion as Joe attempts to deal with accusations against him. Eventually things become even worse when the town gets riled up and the lynch mob decides to take justice into their own hands. Tracy is fairly moving in the simple scenes of him screaming for his life. There's an especially poignant moment from Tracy as he embraces his dog as though it is the last living thing he's going to interact with.

Well that's when everything takes a downturn as the police station burns down to the ground and apparently Joe along with it. Well that's not the case for Joe who manages to survive just barely although he only informs this fact to his brothers for them to prosecute the mob that tried to kill him. Well Tracy plays these scenes all wrong as though Joe is just really ticked off and wants the revenge as almost a maniacal villain. It would have been interesting for him to show Joe Wilson as having been scarred by the experience which propels him for revenge. The problem is Tracy way overplays the idea making Joe's, well, Fury seem more that of an evil man than a man seeking revenge out of something horrible that was done to him. Even when he hears that things are going his way Tracy plays it up with too much of a devious glee. It ends up just not making sense for the way he established the character in the first third. It's not a broken man that Tracy presents but a completely different man which really loses a great deal of the power behind his crusade.

As is oddly the case with many of Tracy's "lead" performances early on his career there's not a great deal of him. He's not simply supporting though like he was in his Oscar nomination for San Francisco but the film takes a great deal of time showing the court case against the mob where we only see the occasional cutaway to Joe. Eventually Joe is taken to task by Katherine about his plan of revenge which causes Joe to do some soul searching. This is pretty rushed although Tracy at least seems to bring back Joe anywhere near the character he established early on the film, and ends on a fine enough note as Joe makes his survival known to the court in order not to take revenge. This performance does have strong moments most notably just before Joe thinks he's going to die but the whole middle section of his work seems like a missed opportunity. Instead of portraying a decent man committing a vendetta over what has been done to him, he instead makes Joe into far too simplistic villain that really removes the heft of the needed dramatic weight for the film.

Monday, 4 May 2015

Alternate Best Actor 1936

And the Nominees Were Not:

Edward Arnold in Come and Get It

Charles Laughton in Rembrandt

Charlie Chaplin in Modern Times

Spencer Tracy in Fury

Jean Gabin in The Lower Depths