Saturday 19 February 2022

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2021: Andre Holland in Passing

Andre Holland did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Brian Redfield in Passing. 

Passing tells the story of two light skinned African American women reigniting their friendship over several years which creates complications as one of the women occasionally "passes" (pretends to be white) in public while the other does so all the time. The film works best as a mood piece with the aesthetic and tone well realized by Rebecca Hall's impressive directorial debut.

Andre Holland portrays the doctor husband of one of the two women Irene (Tessa Thompson). Holland's performance in a way is the opposite of so much of the film. This is befitting his character of Brian Redfield who isn't caught up in a grey area in race, as someone who would never "pass" however also as someone who would never have any intention to "pass". Holland is wonderful from the outset by being decidedly unfussy in his approach showing bluntly this ease of the man's manner as he talks to his wife, his expression of his love towards her just a truth about him. Holland's portrayal is of very much a practical man which seems to stand in contrast to his wife who seems mentally caught up on the world of her friend Clare (Ruth Negga), who pretends to be white all the time, to the point she's married to a rich racist (Alexander Skarsgård). Holland is good by being just so honestly this man who isn't hung up on the seeming grey areas in the same way. When asking even about her relationship with Clare, he asks with just a bemused interest as one would converse about a casual situation. His performance accentuates a practical man of the world to the point even when reading Clare's letter it is with a little bit of a joking tone as a man who is just rather confused by the the particular tone of it. Although also a fantastic bit of nuance in his work as a moment of a deeper curiosity glints upon Brian's face when he reads just how passionate Clare's request to see his wife is, perhaps even a bit of concern.  

Holland's performance though accentuates a man thinking very much to what is going on directly in his life and speaks to the surface. What works so well about his performance is it provides this contrast against Thompson's and Negga's performance that are almost entirely about in-between the lines. Holland has this great natural presence about himself here. Even in the scenes of dancing out in the town, Holland's performance thrives with the ease of his work, that feels appropriate to the film's period, which the periodness of this film is very thick, yet still feels entirely natural as the character. He provides a great balance between the two sides seeming someone from the 1920's but still wholly tangible as a person you could believe from any time. Where we see the real power of this comes in when the film covers the blunter realities of African Americans living in American during the period. Holland just in the way he delivers the news to his wife that their son was called the n-word it is with such power because Holland says it in such a straight forward way, almost reflecting the way their real life isn't in her high society friend and her life of a strange duplicity, but the reality of what they and their kids are actually living day to day. His delivery of the new of a lynching to his sons, Holland speaks of the severity without hesitation or softness, as a man who wants his sons to know the realities of their life. This isn't without caring though, his way of his face falling after letting his son run off reveals such a sensitivity to the plight of his boys and the very terrible concern he has for them. When this clash between innocence and reality, Holland is terrific in the confrontation scene with Thompson over the issue of telling their sons this reality. Holland's performance so clearly articulates the intensity of his belief as attached to the severity of the situation. Although all that contrasts against the disruption of their lives represented by Clare, to which Irene seems to believe her husband has some belief in, however I liked how Holland plays every scene with Negga as seemingly uncomplicated, rather just a man again very to the point and charmed by her graceful presence. His uncomplicated reaction in a way creating the complication as Irene begins to believe Brian is having an affair with Clare, by showing a man smitten with her, however leaving the question if truly smitten merely smitten as everyone seems to be with Clare to some degree or another. Holland plays the reactions to the accusations well by again playing right on the middle while being believable. Holland expressing either a man guilty because of true guilt, or guilty due to shame of the thought of the act that would be guilt. Although that is seemingly assuaged tragically by the ending, though again Holland's work is strong by in a way being straight forward in his reaction portraying the horror of the moment but also projecting the concern for his wife as well. Although Brian isn't exactly the focus of the film, Holland gives a very strong performance as he articulates effectively often the alternative perspective within the piece. He is never simply the "husband" character finding his own depth and most importantly providing that essential contrast within the narrative.

34 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Have Negga and Thompson gone up.

Stephen Patterson said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Passing's cinematography and screenplay.

Calvin Law said...

Glad he got a strong rating, love this film so much.

Stephen: He gave his thoughts on the cinematography before, I’ll try to find them.

Calvin Law said...

Here: https://actoroscar.blogspot.com/2022/01/alternate-best-actor-1966-uttam-kumar.html?m=1

Louis: could I have your thoughts on the following scenes from Passing?

Clare and Irene’s first meeting
The first party scene
The garden chat (‘I wish we were better friends’)
The ending

Calvin said...

Calvin: Thank you for the link.

Stephen Patterson said...

Calvin: Thank you for the link.

Accidentally put your name in the name/url section.

Bryan L. said...

1. Wright
2. Affleck
3. Cooper
4. Pacino
5. Strathairn

1. Faist
2. Lie
3. Okada
4. Leung
5. Holland

Luke Higham said...

1. Cooper
2. Affleck
3. Wright
4. Pacino
5. Strathairn

HTT said...

Although I wasn't all that crazy about this performance (probably a 3.5 to a 4 for me), I'm still happy to see Holland get a well-deserved 4.5. Really hoping this film clicks with me soon lmao

Bryan L. said...

I have to be honest: I’m not sure as to why a lot of you guys are predicting Cooper to win his part of the lineup. He’s very good, but he’s not really in the film that much, and I have a feeling that the only 5s’ Louis will give in Licorice Pizza are Hoffman & Haim.

(No disrespect to anyone, but I’m just curious).

Bryan L. said...

To reiterate, he’s one of the highlights of the film; it’s just that the performance doesn’t scream “1” to me.

RatedRStar said...

1. Cooper
2. Affleck
3. Wright
4. Pacino
5. Strathairn

1. Lie
2. Faist
3. Okada
4. Leung
5. Holland

RatedRStar said...

Bryan L.:I think lineup 2 is stronger than 1.

Calvin Law said...

Louis has repeatedly talked many times about how much he adores the entire Jon Peters secret, hasn’t really made a secret of how my how much he loves Cooper’s performance.

Lucas Saavedra said...

1. Cooper
2. Affleck
3. Wright
4. Pacino
5. Strathairn

1. Lie
2. Faist
3. Okada
4. Leung
5. Holland

Bryan L. said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Bryan L. said...

Calvin: Alright yeah, I do understand that more now.

Louis loving the Jon Peters sequence of the film could have just as much to do with PTAs direction as it does with Cooper too though, but we shall see.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the recent casting announcements for Nolans’ Oppenheimer?

Peter Griffin said...

1. Cooper (won the lineup)
2. Wright
3. Affleck
4. Strathairn
5. Pacino

1. Okada
2. Faist
3. Lie
4. Holland
5. Leung

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Thompson yes, and sorry Calvin, no to Negga, still don't *quite* see the greatness of her work, though I do think she's very good. I actually got more out of her character though in terms of Thompson's portrayal of her perspective of her.

Stephen:

Hall's screenplay uses the basic structure of the novella, and much of what is said and what happens is more or less the same. There is a bit more detail in like Brian's character, where his overall point in the narrative is the same we get a bit more detail on that. Though Hall actually reworked and simplified to a degree the initial meeting where one character is wholly removed from the scene. Mostly though what the original material is, is what Hall is transplanting largely this rumination of a single character rather than a exploration of the greater issues. Irene is the character in question, as even Clare is largely an enigma which Irene reacts to, and deals with a commentary of. The greater implications around "passing" aren't really in the novella, and I think is fair to say Hall could've perhaps explored that more, though that would've been a less faithful adaptation. It is more so this examination of this singular woman in the society, and I would say as such, Hall's screenplay delivers that. Of course I think her direction is more impressive here, because so much of the novella is descriptive prose of one's thoughts and one's behavior, so her ability to have captured that with her direction is remarkable.

Calvin:

First Meeting I think is what you do get to Hall's direction, as it is actually very to imagine such melodrama with how that scene is handled, however as so much of it she lays the importance on capturing the reactions between Thompson and Negga.

The first party scene is where the film is perhaps most analytical, and I think could perhaps steer one into thinking the film is not what it is. What it works most well at as creating the sense of the way we see that Clare is such a fixation for Irene, and Thompson is able to show that this fixation is a particularly complicated one.

The garden chat is what you have the technical unspoken conflict that is essentially the seeming ease of Clare's life against Irene, as Clare charms any room she's in, even just when casually sunning in an afternoon.

The ending actually is what changed most for me on re-watch as the first time, I thought it was simple murder per the intruder, though watching it again, where Irene's feelings clearly are not just of love towards Clare, it became fairly obvious that her actions in many ways were more fundamental, with the ending not being about a sadness of a misplacement of justice, but rather this sadness over one's own feelings of insecurities that led to tragedy.

Bryan:

Well I have not objections except maybe Olli Haaskivi who was atrocious in Falcon and the Winter Soldier. Some interesting choices particularly with Downey and especially Safdie who might have *the* supporting role with Edward Teller as a classic treacherous "friend".

Louis Morgan said...

Also watched the Souvenir Part II, and actually really liked it. I appreciated the lack of dead air and constant droning conversations with an instantly tiresome man (Had my concerns with Charlie Heaton thankfully he exits quickly). I saw one review that said if you didn't like the first one, you wouldn't like this one, that's completely wrong. This film played for me as how the other film intended to be, with actually engaging conversations, a true narrative thrust, and far more interesting visual choices.

Swinton Byrne - 4.5
Swinton - 3.5
Ayoade - 4
Dickinson - 3
Heaton - 2
Alwyn - 3

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the cast.

Luke Higham said...

And it is now officially a record-equalling year for Lead Actress.

Marcus said...

Louis: Your top ten favourite film sequels? You can include third and subsequent films as well.

Also, are my predictions still valid?

Calvin Law said...

That's fine, Louis, I'm delighted to see Thompson's gone up for you either way, and also that you liked The Souvenir Part II which I agree seems like an entirely different film in the best possible way. Agreed that Heaton is the weak link and love to see Swinton Byrne get such a high rating, I thought she got way more of an opportunity to shine in this one.

Calvin Law said...

Also, I think I could watch an entire film around Ayoade's Patrick. What a dynamic character, would absolutely love to see more of his egotistical yet strangely compelling tendencies.

Anonymous said...

Louis: your top 10 ruth Negga acting moments

RatedRStar said...

Passing was my 8th favorite film of 2021, I think 80% percent of that goes to Rebecca Hall, its such a methodical film and yet it has a massive payoff that rewards the slow patient bulidup.

Calvin Law said...

Agreed on her methodical precisions and payoffs. Given her background in acting in them, I would absolutely love to see Hall tackle a slow burn horror/thriller film, I think she would be phenomenal at doing those.

Louis: retro choices for films Hall could tackle?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Another agreement between me and Louis this year: Thompson > Negga.

Mitchell Murray said...

Yah, I suppose I should chyme in on Holland here...

I honestly wasn't expecting him to be reviewed, but he is good and adds a definite realism to the film, mostly as a blunt yet needed reminder of the hardships Negga's character is trying to avoid.

Mitchell Murray said...

Also, I have a voice acting question and a rock music question for everyone here: For anyone whose seen/heard the following, what would be your thoughts on these VA performances and songs?

Performances:
Graham McTavish as Dracula - Netflix's Castlevania series
James Arnold Taylor as Obi Wan Kenobi - Clone Wars
Eric Loomis as Iron Man/Rick D. Wasserman as Thor - Earth's Mightiest Heroes
Troy Baker as Joel/Ashley Johnson as Ellie - The Last of Us (2013)
Henry Rollins as Zaheer/Zelda Williams as Kuvira - The Legend of Korra

Songs:
What Lies Beneath - Breaking Benjamin
Darkest Part - Red
Ten Million Voices - Shaman's Harvest

Calvin Law said...

It is a shame that Thompson's more understated performance couldn't get more traction, then again I'm of the opinion that Passing was done dirty throughout awards season by Netflix (though I understand why they picked Don't Look Up and The Lost Daughter to campaign harder because of the wider appeal, doesn't mean I have to like the decision).

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Swinton-Byrne - (I feel gets to express more and thankfully gets away from Burke's character of dullness. I think she captures well this very specific kind of spirit of uncertainty of her age. Her work I think has a fundamental charm because of her very naturalistic style that in a way is both wholly different from her mother's presence, even though she certainly by nature still evokes her. Her work here works though just by being ever present particularly in so many key silent reactions whether that is investigating the seemingly meaningless threads of her layabout deceased lover, or the difficulties of trying to move on personally and professionally. I particularly liked her reactions of taking in the struggles and frustrations of others as she tries to consistently direct her film best she can.)

Swinton - (Honestly one of her least Swintony performances in a way despite perhaps playing one of her most Swinton roles by playing her off-screen daughters mother her. I liked Swinton here because she actually doesn't play it with any sort of out of the ordinary note, she's just a loving mother, somewhat concerned but mostly just caring and patient.)

Ayoade - (I agree with Calvin I think you could've made a whole film about him here. Ayoade is a whole lot of fun in bringing such a potent pompous self absorption. Ayoade just brandishing the wall of the "genius" just as you see nothing by this hollow sense of ego of a man who thinks he's brilliant yet has failed to prove his brilliance. His best moment probably being his final one where you still see him putting on the wall of his greatness while he clearly is dealing with very much a shattered ego.)

Dickinson - (Liked his passionate attempt at character analysis.)

Heaton - (Yeah I don't see his appeal I guess if he's not acting with Noah Schnapp. Very try hard "cool" here and didn't work for me at all.)

Alwyn - (Liked his low key charm and thought he was particularly good in making the awkward moment both naturally awkward but also sweet in its own way due to his earnest explanation of the situation.)

Marcus:

Yes, you and Shaggy as well certainly commented enough in the past to legitimatize yourselves.

Anyways, favorite sequels that aren't part of planned or thematic trilogies (e.g. no Human Condition or LOTR).

1. The Godfather Part II
2. Mad Max: Fury Road
3. Blade Runner 2049
4. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
5. The Dark Knight
6. Aliens
7. The Empire Strikes Back
8. Skyfall (If Casino Royale is the "first" film)
9. Spider-Man 2
10. The Bride of Frankenstein

Calvin:

Changeling
White Nights
A Bergman adaptation maybe Persona.

Anonymous:

1. Win the war - Loving
2. "fight of sorts" - Loving
3. Meeting the lawyer - Loving
4. Marriage proposal - Loving
5. Return - Passing
6. Argument - Loving
7. Dinner table - Loving
8. First scene - Passing
9. Garden - Passing
10. Final party - Passing

Probably worthy scenes in Preacher that I'm not remembering because of my intense dislike of the show, despite her being good in it.