Saturday, 20 March 2021

Best Actor 2020: Riz Ahmed in Sound of Metal

Riz Ahmed received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Ruben Stone in Sound of Metal. 

Sound of Metal is a terrific character study about a heavy metal drummer who begins to rapidly lose his hearing. 

Riz Ahmed is yet another up and coming actor Oscar nominated this year who has slowly been building up an impressive resume for himself. While much of his film work, since his semi breakout in the dark comedy Four Lions, has been in supporting roles, Sound of Metal gives him the chance to take center stage once again. Ahmed takes on the role of drummer Ruben Stone who we find as he is living, in his own words, the gypsy life with his girlfriend/band-mate Lou (Olivia Cooke), which entails riding in an RV and doing various small time gigs. Ahmed's role in the opening is one really all about the past as we see a seemingly, relatively, normal living. This as much as his character is covered in tattoos, much like the previous Derek Cianfrance/Darius Marder collaboration character played by Ryan Gosling in The Place Beyond the Pines. Although this initially isn't a performance at all about being tortured, though the past is there. Ahmed's work, with Olivia Cooke, actually artfully captures a particular kind of normalcy between Ruben and Lou. They have a nice kind of ease in their chemistry. This as we just see them play together, and spend time together in their constantly moving life. Their conversations though are casual and both actors really capture the nature of a longer relationship here. There in that ease we just see these two have been together for awhile. It goes a bit further though than that in creating the essential history, which isn't quite spoken, where the two likely met at a rehab facility for drug addiction. 

I think in this you have very important moments within their interactions. Such as an early scene where the early riser Ruben prods Lou to get up to basically dance with him. A simple scene yet Ahmed uses it so well. This as his performance on one end reaffirms a clear sense of love between the two, but there is also a bit more. The way Ahmed prods has a certain sense of facilitation. This isn't a negative rather we see in Ahmed's performance a sense of a set routine he has to try to keep Lou on the straight and narrow path. This as they create a rather effective sense of this relationship which I think so artfully borders the line between just a straight up loving relationship and a co-dependent situation. In their interactions we see both, and in this they create the real history of two former addicts who found solace and support in each other, while it was probably lacking in most places. Again this is all almost entirely unsaid, and it is just impressive in the vivid sense of the relationship that both Ahmed and Cooke bring. We get those moments of just normal people in a relationship, but still the sense of a connection of a desperate need in each other to live each moment. Even though the film doesn't at all give us an obvious backstory we have a strong sense of where Ruben is coming from due to Ahmed's nuanced performance. This setting up the man clearly where he is, before he has the rug pulled out from under him as he suddenly begins to lose his hearing.

As Ruben starts losing his hearing Ahmed is great in depicting the progression of this realization. This in starting out in these reactions of just genuine confusion of not knowing what is going on, and just surprise at the situation. His reaction to his diagnosis is terrific in balancing a sense of disbelief but also a kind of denial all the same. As he speaks instantly of the potential alternative of a cochlear implant, Ahmed delivers these words with a fearing immediacy. This as he speaks towards needing just a solution to the problem as soon as possible without a sense of really even accepting that his situation is about to get worse before it improves. This as Ahmed shows just a worsening state of denial and internalizes powerfully that sense of that anxiety. In his eyes you almost get an idea of the barrier of denial in this time as Ruben seemingly tries to not even think about it. This to the point when he suggests alternatives for their performances again Ahmed speaks as a man looking for solutions that would quickly avoid the problem more than anything else. When Lou has Ruben call his sponsor, suggesting a potential relapse, Ahmed is terrific in his conversation. Speaking every word with an emotional defensiveness which signals a very real frustration while also trying so hard to assure that every thing is fine. Ahmed showing naturally a man truly at an edge, wholly earning his raw emotional breakdown as the man just seems at a complete loss for answers. Ahmed presenting the moment as just a mess coming from a bursting at the seams after trying so hard to hold it together and falling apart all at once. 

Eventually they seek help in a shelter designed for addicts who are deaf lead by Joe (Paul Raci). Ahmed's performance in the initial interview is excellent in conveying the state of uncertainty of a man who has been in a very specific relationship and comfort zone with Lou. This as anything against that he speaks as with a anxiety ridden dismissiveness. When Joe particularly suggests the two will need to separate during the period in which he becomes accommodated with the shelter, that defensiveness becomes all the stronger to the point of initially rejecting the shelter. Following that, Ahmed shows Ruben speaking his suicidal words as the state of the man now completely unsettled and lost in the moment as he is unable to cope with his hearing loss that uproots his life. Due to Lou refusing to let him not go to the shelter he finally does. Here we get some great work by Ahmed and I love that he doesn't suddenly become Randle McMurphy, which would be ill-fitting to the nature of this story. Instead Ahmed presents something befitting this man who is struggling on the outside with what had been his place of comfort for so long. Ahmed's eyes bringing a sense of two things. One being still that anxiety of a man at first so ill at ease at suddenly no longer being within his zone, but also the seeds of a sense of discovery. This as he watches everything going at the shelter with a degree of both confusion and the right hint of curiosity. 

In the shelter scenes Ahmed's work is pivotal in creating an arc that fittingly is so often in silence. We see that discontent early on and minor bits of almost an annoyance as though he's almost a kid sent to camp who didn't want to go. In this though Ahmed captures the energy of the character so effectively in creating the state of sort of needing some kind of output, which keeps him from any comfort. This leading Joe to get Ruben to try a practice of sitting a room in the morning of either sitting or writing. Seemingly simple moments comes from this, yet so important, this in Ahmed showing really the difficultly Ruben has in accepting the silence so to speak. This creating a real sense of the frustration of just sitting and as he initially out pours onto the paper in an emotional rage of sorts, but gradually seems to find some sense of solace in the practice. With that though we also have a progression of beautifully performed scenes by Ahmed of Ruben just slowly coming to accept the shelter and better himself through it. He makes this progression feel so honest and natural, by just slowly losing that sense of anxiety and discomfort, this instead replaced by connection within the interactions with everyone around him. Ahmed making such simple moments, as playing with kids or teaching them the drums, genuinely moving by depicting this genuine change in the man to finding an authentic output for himself essentially. This is where we see Ruben coming to accept not only his deafness but himself. This again is rarely spoken outright rather Ahmed, makes you feel every moment of this natural transformation. 

The one thing that seems to hold Ruben back is actually what once propped him up, this is as he sneaks off every so often to try to check on Lou. In these moments we see a return to that anxiety in Ahmed's eyes as he watches whatever she is doing next, and see now the negative side of that co-dependence. This leading Ruben to sell everything he owns to afford his cochlear implants, which are not quite the perfect fix that he was hoping for. Ahmed again is great by so fundamentally creating the right sense of the experience within his own work. This as his reactions show a different discovery, a somewhat unpleasant one as his expression is of the disconcerting realization that he could not simply just return himself to his old self. The following confrontation work is simply one of the best acted scenes of 2020, as the moment isn't really about right and wrong, but rather the difference within their philosophies and personal intention. This as Ruben goes to explain himself Ahmed's sense of passion is real and even his sense of real love towards Joe as he explains himself. He explains himself not from a place of discontent in the same way, rather showing a man who cares deeply, while trying to plead his case. Ahmed is fantastic in conveying the sense of split loyalties within the moment as he tries to explain, and Ahmed finds the emotional desperation in trying to come to an understanding however failing to do so. It is heartbreaking work on both end, because both actors so vividly grant you a sense where each man is coming from. What I see as the epilogue of the film then follows Ruben as he tries to recapture his old life by returning to Lou who is now in France. I think here Ahmed is great actually by the understated nature of his work. This as he shows that even that underlying motivation is almost perfunctory to some degree. When he speaks about returning to their old life, it isn't with a straight passion, but rather almost as a dutiful choice to hold up the past. The moment that is not perfunctory is their recognition of their relationship where both are remarkable in expressing just the genuine love and gratitude to each other. Even in this though Ahmed carefully shows that something has changed, and the two are no longer linked in the way they had been for so long. The love is there, but it is now different. This making his choice to leave alone an earned one. This only followed by really the pitch perfect ending through Ahmed's always outstanding performance that finds the right nuance in this moment. This as it isn't just a physical unpleasantness that he shows as Ruben removes his implants to embrace the silence. Rather Ahmed is able to project finally a contentment within the man in the moment, a man who can now be still and embrace himself for who he is. 

71 comments:

Anonymous said...

Okay im chaing my predictns slighty:
1. Hopkins
2. Ahmed
3. Boseman
4. Yeun
5. Oldman

Matt Mustin said...

Sticking to my guns with this prediction. Just am.

Luke Higham said...

Fuck it, I'll stick with mine as well.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: The other requests were Kyle MacLachlan in Blue Velvet (Matt) and Danny Glover in To Sleep With Anger (Aidan).

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Do you think any comparisons could be made with both "Quo Vadis, Aida?" and "Dear Comrades!"? They do seem to have several elements in common, though in a positive way.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I apologize if you thought I insulted your intelligence. I just wanted to help out. I admit I can be abit of a nuiscance at times but I can't help myself.

Mitchell Murray said...

No surprises here, and I'll likewise stick to my initial predictions.

Also, I'll again profess my admiration for Ahmed with his current streak. I'm glad he was able to bounce back after "Venom", something that his more established co-star has been surprisingly unable to do.

Roger Parma said...

1. Hopkins
2. Boseman
3. Yeun
4. Ahmed
5. Oldmam

Anonymous said...

Louis: Would you say that ahmed following his terrible performance in venom with this amazing performance two years later is similar to Elliot Gould doing the long goodbye two years after the touch?

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Don't worry about it, but I've never forgotten a request in the past, so please take that as my standard.

Bryan:

Well yes, particularly since they BOTH should've been nominated (man that Better Days nom, would be easily my Siskel & Ebert "worst nomination" if it weren't for Close). Although obviously very different in overall tone, you get a similar since of urgency along with POV of the mother desperately trying to navigate a massacre or a pending massacre.

Anonymous:

Not quite, Ahmed was working with a terrible part and a lackluster, at best, director. Also for a studio that is very capable of making boneheaded decisions. Gould was working for Bergman, and gave legitimately the only bad performance I've seen in a Bergman film so far.

Aryan Varma said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mitchell Murray said...

Louis: Speaking of "Venom" a little more, who would be your personal choice to play Carnage?

I like Woody Harrelson a lot, and he's certainly done his fair share of villainous roles, but I'm still not sure what to expect from his Cletus Kasady. It may something to do with his age...or that terrible wig.

Luke Higham said...

Mitchell: They scrapped the wig for the sequel. I don't know, I'd rather see him first before knocking him down.

Louis Morgan said...

Mitchell:

Walton Goggins.

Mitchell Murray said...

Luke: Thank god they did, then. That would've just been distracting.

Louis: I second Goggins.

Luke Higham said...

Those who've played GTA V, do you think Walton Goggins would be the perfect Trevor Philips in a Live-Action adaptation.

Anonymous said...

Luke: I'm trying to imagine how Walton Goggins would do the "You are a hipster" scene.

Mitchell Murray said...

Luke: Now I'm just imagining Goggins playing out a lot of Trevor's scenes, and it's absolutely hilarious.

Unknown said...

Luke: Who would you cast as franklin and Michael?

Luke Higham said...

Unknown:
Michael: Ray Liotta or Michael Madsen (Let's say these men were still in their 50s)
Franklin: Trevante Rhodes

Emi Grant said...

Actually, Ahmed is playing a Hardcore noise-punk drummer, Louis. Subtle difference, I know, but I did go to drumming classes for a year and a half, so of course I know everything about drummers.

I'm kidding of course. That said, I do have one minute nitpick with Ahmed's performance that I don't know if anyone else notices or cares about, but on the initial scenes of him just playing on concerts, he seems so stiff and uptight when playing. Which would just make everything he's playing so difficult on himself and seems ill-fitting for what I think is implied to be an experienced drummer.

Then again, this is such a small issue that doesn't really hold any weight compared to the rest of his performance. I'm glad you mentioned how they imply and hint at Ruben and Lou's history together through their interactions, 'cause that could have easily been lost with a lesser actor.

Luke Higham said...

And Jonah Hill is obviously Jimmy De Santa.

Bryan L. said...

Luke: I was actually thinking of Corey Hawkins for Franklin, and maybe Shea Whigham as Michael.

Emi Grant said...

Also, I'm wondering, does anybody have a Top 5 of their favorite drummers out of any band they listen to? Here's mine:

1. Brann Dailor - Mastodon
2. Dave Lombardo - Slayer
3. Gene Hoglan - SYL/Testament/Death
4. Scott Travis - Judas Priest
5. Abe Cunningham - Deftones

Bryan L. said...

Emi: #1 for me is Neil Peart, but others I like are...

John Bonham - Led Zeppelin
Stewart Copeland - The Police
Keith Moon - The Who
Dave Grohl - Nirvana
Dave Lombardo - Slayer
Tre Cool - Green Day
Jimmy Chamberlin - The Smashing Pumpkins

Bryan L. said...

(I actually haven't heard that much from The Who, but Keith Moon makes an IMPRESSION.)

Matt Mustin said...

Emi: Not gonna rank them, but I'll give you five. Hard to narrow it down though.

Ian Paice-Deep Purple
John Bonham-Led Zeppelin
Neil Peart-Rush
Stewart Copeland-The Police
Mitch Mitchell-The Jimi Hendrix Experience

Bryan L. said...

1. Hopkins
2. Ahmed
3. Boseman
4. Yeun
5. Oldman

Thomas said...

Luke: I read an earlier post from you a few years back about National Anthems and what are your top 5.

Luke Higham said...

Thomas:
Russia
Wales
France
England (Jerusalem)
South Africa

I much prefer America The Beautiful over Star Spangled Banner.

Matt Mustin said...

Did anyone watch the Falcon and the Winter Soldier premiere? Mixed bag for me, but I thought Sebastian Stan was very good.

Luke Higham said...

I wish I had the motivation to watch the MCU shows but it really feels like overkill.

Anonymous said...

Matt: Robert said on his twitter that he surprisingly enjoyed it.

Tim said...

your thoughts on the direction and editing of Rocky?

Emi Grant said...

Bryan, Matt: Peart and Bonham are such GOAT players. Ian Paice is a great shout-out too.

Calvin Law said...

BRILLIANT performance, I can’t stress that enough and gets better each time, in fact he might be my favourite of the nominees. And I love your choice of photo Louis.

Louis: I can FINALLY ask this. How do you think Matthias Schoenaerts would’ve fared in the role? Him and Dakota Johnson (and in turn I think Cooke was the better choice) were originally cast. I think he would’ve been great, but I think Ahmed brought something a little different, a bit of a different energy and I think Schoenaerts would’ve given a great but different performance too.

Calvin Law said...

Also, your top 10 Ahmed acting moments.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Apparently Matthias Schoenaerts and Dakota Johnson were supposed to play Ruben and Lou before being replaced by Ahmed and Cooke. How do you think they would have done? For me personally... I don't really see it.

Anonymous said...

Wow I was writing the question when Calvin asked it. Wow :)

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: Do you prefer him in this or The Night Of.

I think the top 10 Ahmed moments should be saved until the next review as it could influence predictions.

Calvin Law said...

Luke: this, definitely. Although that is not to diminish his The Night Of work at all.

Also I’m happy performances in films like this are getting recognition this year, because I can think of a few previous years where Ahmed and Raci might’ve gone AWOL in awards season altogether.

Anonymous said...

Luke who do you think the next review will be? I think Oldman will be the last review.

Luke Higham said...

If not for the more recent breakthroughs in Academy membership, it would've gone completely under the radar unfortunately.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Agreed on Oldman since he has an uncertain air about him but I think it's going to be Yeun next.

Calvin Law said...

Luke: it does seem so doesn’t it? Although I will grant that in the past few years, the directors and screenplay branches in the Academy make their fair share of inspired decisions. Before Vinterberg, there was Pawlikowski; and there’s always nifty interesting choices in Screenplay almost every year.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Lord help me, I liked the Snyder cut.

Tim said...

Robert: (eternal grinning) elaborate

Mitchell Murray said...

Robert: I'm curious, because I've been avoiding the Synder cut like the plague; What urged you to seek it out?

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Johnson I'd have more trepidation over but Schoenaerts I agree would *also* have been great. It is important to remember Schoenaerts's amazing range, and if you're thinking Bullhead or the Mustang it is harder to see it, but if you think Rust and Bone and The Drop it's easy to see his path. Would've been definitely different still, but like Mifune in The Karate Kid, glad we got the casting we got, but I would like to visit the alternate reality with Schoenaerts's take.

Robert:

Yeah...me too.

Mitchell:

Probably this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhbeugRm66U

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on it and updated ratings and thoughts on the cast.

Louis Morgan said...

Tim:

John G. Avildsen's direction really shouldn't be take for granted. This as it did establish a template that so many have tried to copy ever sense. Now part of the film is a lot of more 70's docudrama stylings, that I actually think work great in giving the film the right lived in quality, and a sense of place in Philadelphia that really is effective. You get to know Rocky from truly a street level. It is also important to note the way he let Stallone tackle certain scenes in re-writing moments to make them work better like choreographing the fights and changing some moments, although this also goes to show you just how fundamental Stallone was to the film in every sense. The major element though is in crafting the big moments of the training and the final fight, where the choices go way beyond this film in terms of influence. This in streamlining and just making the sports film so much more compelling and engaging.

Speaking of the editing is all time great in reworking film language in some ways in this particular montage to score that it realizes that goes above and beyond in that technique. So many montages of the future owe so much of their debt to what the Rocky editors did in crafting this technique so powerfully. Of course that is among otherwise a well edited drama film, because as much as the montages are brilliance in cutting, the film itself is overall calmer however wholly effective in this editing of the drama.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I mean this was like watching Anthony Franciosa in Career, you gotta give me a moment...

Matt Mustin said...

Can the Snyder cut be considered it's own movie? Ie will the cast be ranked for 2021, or is that not fair?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: We’ve lived long enough to see ourselves become the villains

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

Um...I mean technically it should be 2017, but I'll admit this is more so a grey area than most director's cuts. Most director's cuts are the film with additional scenes maybe some reworking here and there. Here the two cuts honestly only share the action scenes (which also vary heavily at times) and really some establishing shots. I don't know the exact percentage of new footage (including the alternate takes which are new footage given the dialogue is completely different every time), but I imagine it is extremely high.

Robert:

Yeah, time to get out the burned coin.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

One of my favourite nominations period, and that's not even taking into account how much this means for Muslim actors in Hollywood. Great work.

Louis: Your thoughts on the direction of Sound of Metal?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Here’s my basic thoughts that I jotted down on Facebook. Forgive the stream-of-conciousness writing.

So. I’ve spent five years of my life frothing at the mouth at any mention of Zack Snyder after my rather infamous disadain Batman v. Superman. I still loathe it just as much as I did at the time. I skipped out on the release of Justice League because I didn’t want to waste anymore of my time. When the calls for the apparently fabled “Snyder Cut” came, I was annoyed. The most irritating and abusive online fanbase spammed it on Twitter until finally, when WB could spare to burn the money with their recent HBO Max acquisition, the caved.

Naturally, I balked at every given opportunity to this film’s existence. I was incensed that spoiled brats got their way for kicking and screaming for four years. I mocked, and jeered, and made some regretful comments I’d rather not get into.

But then I read an article where Zack Snyder talked about the death of his daughter during post-production of Justice League, the effects it had on him, and how he watched a work that was rightfully his shredded to ribbons while he grieved. I stopped my rhetoric a few weeks ago after reading it. In hindsight, even with my criticisms of his work, I’ve been needlessly hyperbolic in my hatred. I made it my “brand”. I should have never made something as toxic as hating a movie part of my entire identity.

So, with all that said, I sat down and watched the Snyder Cut of Justice League, and to my very pleasant surprise, I rather liked it. Is it perfect? No, far from it. It’s obviously needlessly excessive in its 4 hour length, and his flourishes can still be dumb. But what a surprise to see his emotional growth.

He’s learned from some previous mistakes. I reached this epiphany in just a five second moment of Batman patting a hurt soldier on the back and encourages him to reach safety. No needless civilian deaths, no Ayn Rand spiels, and some thoughtful character moments that I really didn’t think he would be interested in.

Now, the CG borders on awful at times, but it’s hard to deny Snyder’s sense of mis en scène. He has a visual language that can sometimes be ridiculous, and other times thrilling. The scripy is rather basic, and honestly that’s a good thing. The only true sour spot is an awful, needless epilogue showcasing a sequel that won’t happen featuring a cameo the worst Joker.

You know what? Even with all of that, I enjoyed it. Kudos, Mr. Snyder. Sorry for being a dick for five years.

Calvin Law said...

Agreed with Robert on all fronts. Plus, seeing all the Whedon nonsense he pulled on the set of JL makes me glad we have a version that the cast and crew are happier with overall. Agreed that the awful epilogue is a bum note (and not looking forward to revisionist takes on Leto being a good Joker), but it was an engaging watch overall, particularly appreciated the expanded role to Cyborg and his backstory.

Robert MacFarlane said...

The scene that unexpectedly moved me was in the ACTUAL epilogue (AKA characters wrapping up their arcs) was Billy Crudup’s joy at seeing Barry successfully get a job. It just... hit. Really the themes of parents (specifically paternal) hit harder when you know the tragedy Snyder had to go through. It’s really more introspective than I would have ever imagined.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

As someone who hasn't seen either cut of Justice League, I will just say that it's pretty awesome that Snyder was able to overcome his personal tragedy and make the film he wanted.

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: I know you're not there yet, but I would like to apologize pre-emptively, on behalf of all Canadians, for the fact that you're going to have to watch Bon Cop, Bad Cop.

Anonymous said...

The writer's guild of America awards are on today. My predictions for original and adapted screenplay:
Original: Promising young woman.
Adapted: Ma Rainey's black bottom....I guess.

Luke Higham said...

On Snyder, I was happy to be proved wrong.

Mitchell Murray said...

Matt: That's a little harsh, isn't it? The film has poor aspects but I wouldn't go as far as to call it bad overall; Feore and Huard pretty much save it from being so.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Robert covered it perfectly honestly. There are definite excesses (though even there I can grant some forgiveness as the action is a whole lot punchier than it was in the Theatrical cut), and any comparison to the theatrical cut, Snyder wins. The removal of the heart and depth to both Flash and Cyborg's stories, in favor of horrible comic scenes and the goofy Russian family stuff, are downright baffling. More than anything, I saw Snyder learned from many of his mistakes in BVS and made what I felt was his best film in the DCEU. Not a perfect film by any measure, but definitely a good one. Honestly the things I balked at entirely were relatively minor, like Leto's cameo (this is his best take yet still doesn't work for me), or the sea bubbles to speak, heck I actually even liked tacked on Martian Manhunter because I loved the idea of Harry Lennix being upgraded into that part. The extra epilogue, I think could've been re-framed as additional short scenes or something an addendum, as they play more like extra deleted scenes than part of the film, because the final Joe Morton monologue montage, I thought was quite strong and would've been a terrific note to end on.

Regarding the cast, everyone fares better. Affleck is no longer some bizarre comic foil, instead you actually get a bit of actual comedy that works in scenes between him and Irons. Fisher and Joe Morton's performances are actually there, I mean I can see why the former was ticked, they gutted everything he did. Miller works better here with less terrible comedy, and some actual heart, his climactic scene is another moment where I have to ask "In what world would you cut that out?". Gadot probably got hurt the least by Whedon's changes, but even she is allowed to be more consistent to her original Wonder Woman performance with again less bad jokes.

Tahmeed:

Darius Marder makes a confident debut, this is kind of the year of confident debuts honestly. One part of his direction is just strong work in crafting a low key drama of this sort. This in having the confidence to know when to push and pull so to speak. This as he finds the right quality within his often naturalistic approach to the material. It is easy to create dullness while claiming naturalism, Marder never makes this excuse. This capturing the right pacing within the material, but also knowing when to kind of push his hand a bit in terms of creating the drama of a given scene. He knows when to show his hand and not to, that shows a real confidence with what he has. Now, what also needs to be mentioned, where he also gets a lot of credit, is the focus on the sound design choice. Marder by making this choice not only puts us often in Ruben's experience, it actually makes us think about sound in a completely different way. A masterstroke of direction there. Beyond that though, this is just strong un-fussy work, especially for a debut.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: thoughts on this scene from Sound of Metal? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7wa5O1m4qI

I think it's a great example of that sound design choice (probably the best in the film) and also a highlight of Ahmed's performance.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Is Ezra miller still a 3 for justice league? Because I was surprised that you liked him so much: I thought his brunch joke was horrendous.

Calvin Law said...

Also, as for the Zack Snyder's Justice League cast, my new ratings for them would be:

Affleck: 3
Cavill: 3
Adams: 3.5 (also thought she was benefited)
Gadot: 3
Fisher: 3.5
Miller: 4 (and yeah why on earth did they cut that out)
Momoa: 3
Irons: 3.5
Lane: 3

And agreed completely on the whole idea of Lennix being Martian Manhunter.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

It is great sound design there, this you get their duet that sounds nice as we hear it, then we hear how Ruben it hears it as the unpleasant intertwined interference. A great kind of symbol, amplified by Ahmed's reaction, where we see really that Lou is probably helped by her relationship with her father again, but there isn't really a place for Ruben in that.

Anonymous:

Well first to be fair, the brunch joker weren't *his*, however I believe I made it clear in my original thoughts was that was entirely for his reaction to Superman seeing him during his speed-force scene, the one joke that totally worked for me....and it was Snyder's.

Matt Mustin said...

Mitchell: Not harsh at all. The two are decent together, but outside of that it's worthless.

Mitchell Murray said...
This comment has been removed by the author.