Sacha Baron Cohen received his first acting Oscar nomination for portraying Abbie Hoffman in The Trial of the Chicago Seven.
The Trial of the Chicago Seven depicts the trial of several different protest group leaders after the riots during 1968 Democratic National Convention.
Sacha Baron Cohen depicts perhaps the most famous, or infamous (depending on the way you look at it), member of the titular seven, Abbie Hoffman. The leader of the YIPPIES, aka the Youth International Party, who are depicted here as almost a purposefully chaotic even comedic group meant to disrupt all of society, not just for the intention of peace. This is to the point the film builds a conflict between him and the, depicted here, more straight laced Tom Hayden (Eddie Redmayne) based upon the nature of their methods. Now Cohen, from the outside in, seems like a change of pace for the comic performer. This in taking a role as a historical figure in a historical drama. Although as Hoffman is depicted here, frankly Cohen seems typecast almost by taking on this part. This as Cohen is known for his, particularly now, politically charged chaotic and comic actions against the establishment. This as he has more in common as Hoffman here than expected with his other major performance in 2020, that being his reprise of his most famous character, Borat of Kazakhstan. Both men are shown to want to to subversive, while also getting people to laugh, by making jokes at the expense of those in power. So with all that going for him, is Cohen ideally cast? Well....let's talk about it.
Now first off he's not portraying Abbie Hoffman the man, he is playing writer/director Aaron Sorkin's version of him, which has some truth, but also is fashioned for a different purpose. This actually does help more than it hurts Cohen. This is as Cohen is considerably older than Hoffman was at the time, Cohen only being a couple years younger than when Hoffman died. This creates a different energy. I give Cohen credit that he doesn't try to create some youthful vibe, rather he plays into Hoffman here almost kind of like a slightly past his prime celebrity hippie, still doing his thing. Additionally Hoffman had a mix of experiences growing up giving him a strange mix of an accent. Anyone doing a Hoffman accent is going to sound weird, so Cohen basically finds his own strange pseudo Hoffman accent. It isn't accurate, but I think it ends up being more than fine because Cohen makes it consistent and at least natural within his own performance. It still sounds strange, but really it technically should. This is the basic crafting of the character who here represents the extreme side of the activist within Sorkin's script, who will do anything to disrupt. This including taking on the trial most so an opportunity for him to continue his chaotic brand of activism rather than fall in line in order to avoid the potential jail time that would come from a conviction.
Being an Aaron Sorkin script, who I think always wants his work to be entertaining in at least some way, treats Hoffman's brand of chaos largely as the comic relief. Now to be fair, this holds true in reality to some extent as well where Hoffman would make jokes and make purposeful displays of comic disruptions during the trial. This element of the film is played for laughs to the point he and Jerry Rubin (Jeremy Strong doing his best Charlie Kelly as Jerry Rubin impression), are made to be a comic duo. Rubin being the overt simpleton who is almost entirely played for laughs, against Cohen whose approach is a bit more moderated. Here we see Cohen's performance as he shows a man brimming with glee as he approaches the courthouse. Cohen suggesting a man who loves an audience though perhaps loves his brand of mischief all the more. Cohen speaking his first lines to his counsel, and his first lines to the judge, with a complete lack of shame. In fact Cohen instead amps it up to show a purposeful irreverence to all. He plays towards the joke with his little grins and as he speaks with a directly over the top comic intonation. Although I'll say the comic bits have a bit of diminishing returns on re-watches, though not to a terribly detrimental point, Cohen timing is still pointed as expected, and the right approach in realizing the intention of the character. The character purposefully treating the trial as one big show.
Cohen modulates his performance outside of the trial scenes effectively. This as when we see him interacting with the other men, particularly Redmayne's Hayden, Cohen tones it down and redirects his work a bit. There is still a joking manner, but it is more pointed and hectoring in these scenes. Cohen portraying more of a personal bitterness in his eyes towards his rival with the same purpose, and less so playing towards the crowd, so to speak. He still presents Hoffman as a man who can never quite fully turn it off, but balances it. This in having bits of seriousness as he speaks to his position with a calmer clarity, or his reaction towards some of Hayden's accusations. For example, his eyes sharpen with a very real anger when Hayden accuses him of wanting to keep the war going. Cohen shows a more serious mind within the act, even as the act is ongoing. Now this conflict is ongoing towards where both actors slowly moderate the disdain towards a degree of respect. This in each mainly showing less anger and disdain in their interactions. Cohen doesn't over do this, but rather just keeps it largely internalized through his reactions towards Tom throughout. Eventually this leads to Hoffman taking the stand, and also taking a moment of compromise while later Tom acts out. Anyway, that's the setup and Cohen does earn this. This again through those moments of a tempered attitude in private, and the direct moments where we see his passion for his cause. The famous real moment of Hoffman being asked his price, Cohen delivers well as shaking off any pretense and just speaking as man saying his truth. This naturally seguing to Hoffman taking the stand where Cohen is effective in bringing this same attitude towards the moment. This being a calmer straight demeanor. He creates the right physical tension in his manner both of a man holding himself back, while also speaking with a strict sincerity as he speaks his message. This is a good performance by Sacha Baron Cohen. He navigates the material well, even if again I think the jokes diminish the second time so that part of his performance diminishes a bit as well. I still chuckled a couple times, but a few more begin to sink rather than swim on re-watch, although again this is more so on Sorkin. The better qualities of his work are still prevalent nonetheless in realizing this specific depiction of Hoffman. This which is almost a riff on Cohen's own presence, which is a prankster, but a prankster with a purpose.
103 comments:
Louis: Are you ready to give ratings and thoughts on strong?
Damn...you nailed it Louis. Much like the reviews of Adam Driver and Sam Elliot for 2018, this is a performance I'm slightly higher on myself, but still agree with every word.
Also, I'm going to change my predictions:
1) Raci
2) Stanfield
3) Kaluuya
4) Odom Jr
5) Cohen
Louis: Am I correct to assume that he was a 4.5 on initial watch?
too late to change a last time?
1. Raci
2. Kaluuya
3. Stanfield
4. Odom
5. Cohen
Your thoughts on the screenplay of Soul?
Anonymous:
Strong - 3.5(His bit surprisingly worked for me. I mean I do enjoy the comic styling of Charlie in IAS, so...Either way, his constantly slightly out of it stoned demeanor strangely I just cottoned to, which is even stranger given that I typically don't like Strong at all...though I am liking him in Succession. I don't know he just finds a certain purity within his bit here that makes it work I think, as he always much plays within it, never winking out of it, making the jokes come from his constant state of being.)
Anonymous:
Yes.
Tim:
Soul's screenplay in part is very much the Pixar formula. Someone goes on a journey with a companion where they are trying to get home, meanwhile they learn more about each other and themselves. It is a good version of that. The duo works, particularly through Joe's story, where it grants a bit more maturity to which is well observed. 22 is a bit more standard, but I think she still works. It also has the unlikely Pixar setting, only in part here, and usual they have fun with it in the screenplay. That is fun here in creating the soul world, particularly the lost soul world. I will say the villain as written was not terribly creative, lifted directly from Hunt for the Wilderpeople, but at least they don't overuse or overemphasize her. Then of course you have various bits, which here are all pretty good. I think the key here though is how does it get through the bits, how does it get to its message (which is a particularly inspiring one), how does it get through the journey. Well here the writing just has a bit more depth, a bit more beauty and a bit more sense of place. Compare this to Onward, which felt really thin, and you see the strengths of Soul. They have a similar outline, but one is filled with originality and life...the other is not.
Louis: you ready to give your thoughts on any of the rest of the Chicago 7 cast?
1. Kaluuya
2. Stanfield
3. Raci
4. Odom
5. Cohen
Louis: I hope you're reviewing Rylance because it would be strange not to do a write-up on the MVP.
1. Raci
2. Kaluuya
3. Stanfield
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
Don't know what the hell happened there.
Louis: You’re not going to believe me......but I was actually planning on asking you if J&TBM reminded you of The Molly Maguires after you wrote both Stanfield & Kaluuyas’ reviews.
Calvin:
Well not Rylance.
Redmayne - 4(One of his better performances, and after seeing enough of his work, I have to concur with Robert's theory that Redmayne's face just naturally has weird expressions rather than it being weird acting choices. Not sure if that makes him an ideal actor, but I digress. This is a good counterpart to Cohen's performance this essentially as the "stick in the mud" in contrast. This as he delivers everything with a constant passionate streak. He importantly doesn't over do it, leaving the right sort of space to allow for himself to also create basically the audience surrogate every man seemingly within the 7. Redmayne finds the right balance within his various reactions of trying to field different elements. This being his frustration and later respect towards Abbie, but also his moments of a sense of shame of his own position in other moments. It is a good performance, and he even delivers well on his more overtly passionate moments. He earns them by making that state a constant, but bringing out as something fiery only at the right moments.)
Abdul-Manteen - 4(Obviously his role is more limited. He is good though in portraying the particularly intense and deep seeded discontent over his predicament even compared to the rest. I like that he does balance with enough of a vulnerability and sense of anxiety within this, not just anger, as the character could have easily been one note as written. His role is limited still but he does what he can in finding this balance. I like his moments with Hampton showing the right hints of camaraderie. This to carry his moment reflecting on his death, where he brings the right combination of somberness and dejected anger in the scene. Leading naturally towards his final unrelenting outburst, where his performance properly expresses a man who has had enough.)
I would raise Langella up to a 4, who to those who say he's too much, I'd advise they read about the actual judge.
He's a 4.5 for me, but Rylance is MVP for sure.
Louis: I read an interview with Langella in Indiewire where he said he went researching to find out more about Judge Hoffman to help his performance, only to discover the guy was just pure evil. Certainly made me appeciate his acting even more, since he could've gone a lot more overboard.
Langella was great.
*Sees Cohen getting slightly downgraded*
Me: "Father, no!"
I do like a lot of the things you get at with this review. I think the "prankster with a purpose" line rings very true. I'm also fairly surprised you enjoyed a Strong performance not taking place in Succession.
Could I have your thoughts on Hayden and Hoffman's big argument scene?
I thought he was good also, but it's a bit underwhelming that he was the only one in the film to get awards buzz, and he hasn't really left much of a lasting impression on me like Rylance has. I honestly thought he was much better in Borat Subsequent Moviefilm.
I get why Sacha Baron Cohen got recognition for this, as Abbie Hoffman is obviously the most well-known figure from this group and he's got the big snarky moments, but man, I found his performance to be very underwhelming in the face of Rylance's perfect composure, Langella's fiery demagoguery, Keaton's scene-stealing smoothness, Lynch's heartbreaking decency, and Abdul-Mateen II's fraying stoicism.
Frankly, I think the problem is that Sorkin never really got these guys.
Psifonian: Keaton was such a scene stealer I forgot he was even in it until you said that.
Okay, after finally seeing Judas And The Black Messiah.
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
Luke: your ratings for stanfield and kaluuya?
Anonymous:
Stanfield - 4.5/5 (Excellent)
Kaluuya - 4.5 (He's great but something felt missing to me though to no fault of his)
I must say Kaluuya is quite unfortunate not to get five as of yet.
Luke: I still think he's an easy, no question about it 5 for Get Out, but that's me.
Matt: I'd give him a 5 for it as well. I was referring to him being unlucky so far when it came to the blog.
OK, well he may be a five for this, we'll see.
Luke & Louis, I'm going to have to change mine for a 2nd time.
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
I really need to get Whishaw in Bright Star soon.
Matt: Louis' thoughts on the screenplay really changed my mind whenever he made The Molly Maguires comparison.
Looking at the screentimes for the One Night in Miami guys, is there a lead in that movie or is it pure ensemble?
Matt: The person who made the website said on his twitter that he considers ben-adir and odom lead and he considers goree and hodge supporting.
Gonna change my prediction just slightly,I'm gonna swap the positions of Kaluuya and Stanfield.
Matt: You need to post the full prediction because I use to only swap the two and that caused some issues.
I saw JATBM too and I have to agree with Luke here. Stanfield left more of an impact.
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
OK, new prediction:
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom
5. Cohen
*mumble* I predicted that before it was cool.
Robert: Well, I haven't seen the movie so this was mostly just guess work lol
Oh snap, almost forgot.
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom
5. Cohen
Anonymous2:
Robert, count me in.
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Cohen
5. Odom
Okay i will change my predictions.
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom
5. Cohen
Anonymous2:
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom
5. Cohen
Louis: Your thoughts on Mank's editing and screenplay.
Robert: If you end up being right, I’ll forgive you for leading me towards AN, but if not......eh, I’m mostly over it now anyway.
Im surprised the tide is suddenly so in favour of Stanfield. I’m predicting Kaluuya to still get a 5 mostly because I would still easily give him a 5. He’s my win for 2021. Granted I do find Hampton a lot more compelling than O’Neal so I don’t know.
Glad Abdul-Mateen II is a 4. Frankly he might be my second favourite of the cast besides Rylance. And I 100% agree with Psifonian.
Luke, if not Ray Winstone in Scum, have you thought about what your next request will be.
Calvin: I mean they could easily both be 5s.
Anonymous:
Either Clancy Brown in Highlander or Karl Markovics in The Counterfeiters.
Matt: Oh yeah I fully expect that, but I personally think Kaluuya will still end up above Stanfield. Who’s also a 5 for me anyway.
1. Paul Raci
2. Daniel Kaluuya
3. Lakeith Stanfield
4. Leslie Odom, Jr.
5. Sacha Baron Cohen
Robert: Your thoughts on Kaluuya and Stanfield.
I agree with everything about this review, especially the slight diminishing returns on the humour.
I'll try to rewatch Judas and the Black Messiah before making any changes to my predictions, but I'll stick with my original ones for now.
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
Alright, changing things up again.
1. Raci
2. Stanfield
3. Kaluuya
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
I'm not going to change my prediction again. For some variation and because i myself am sick of changing the fucker.
Unrelated, but i just saw Seven Psychopaths, and had the time of my life doing it. Deliciously meta, always waiting up with another surprise, surprisingly emotionally honest and funny, man is it funny! Especially the scene where Rockwell is telling his movie-ending set in the graveyard was the most i laughed in months (and i saw Tucker And Dale VS Evil high the other day).
Definietly my favorite McDonagh.
Farrell: 4.5
Rockwell: 5
Harrelson: 4.5
Walken: 5
Waits: 3.5
Stanton: 3
the female "characters": 2.5
Tim: LOVE Seven Psychopaths.
Tim: One of us, one of us...
On a side note, who thinks that LaKeith Stanfield being nominated for Supporting Actor will become the next big meme for this award season?
Bringing up Seven Psychopaths always brings me joy. The world could really use another McDonagh film right now.
Louis: Talking about Seven Psychopaths, what's your thoughts on the "Angela" scene (a.k.a. Psychopath N7 reveal).
Now that I think about it, I’m switching mine. Kaluuya had more refined material to work with, whereas Stanfields’ arc wasn’t as well-realized as it could’ve been, in my view. Make some room in the ship Calvin (sorry Robert!)
1. Raci
2. Kaluuya
3. Stanfield
4. Odom
5. Cohen
This is a bloody nightmare for me to decide on. I'm gonna sleep on it.
On another unrelated note, and I ask this out of sheer curiosity; For anyone that visits Youtube a fair amount, what would be your go-to channels to kick back and de-stress?
Me personally, I quite like "Markiplier", "MXR Plays" and "Good Mythical Morning". I find all of them to be consistently enjoyable, mainly due to the interplay between their various hosts IE Mark and friends, Henry and Jeannie, or Rhett and Link.
Just want to point out that Psifonian has the same as mine, and he and Louis agree more often than not.
Anyway, my abridged take on it is: O’Neil’s arc is somewhat murky, but Stanfield threads the needle to make it both believable and powerful. Kaluuya is undoubtedly charismatic, but Hampton... doesn’t really have an arc? I kind of understood the arguments putting him in supporting since the film seems to view him in the abstract for scenes that don’t include public speaking, which were fewer than I expected. If anything I thought the script hampered Kaluuya and not Stanfield.
Eh I personally thought Hampton not having an arc was entirely appropriate. Watching The Murder of Fred Hampton beforehand solidified my belief that what the film was going for was not really any sort of character development but to show how firmly established Hampton was as an individual, how engaging he was in unifying members to his cause, and thus how tragic his assassination was. On the other hand, O'Neal's arc felt like the screenplay didn't know exactly what to do with him. It's telling that Shaka King has mentioned in interviews that some ways the whole Departed-esque undercover story was a way to make the film for more appealing to studios, because it does seem like he would've preferred to make a film entirely centred on Hampton with O'Neal as more of a side character, given that is where (in my opinion) the true strengths of the film and the essential purpose of telling such a story lies. To each one's own though.
For me, the scenes that had more focus on Hampton are the ones that have stayed with me more since I saw the film. Kaluuya was of course terrific in the “leading the charge/public figure” scenes, yet I also found him moving in the scene where Deborah tells him that she’s pregnant.
Louis: thoughts on 'Epiphany' from Soul's score?
Mitchell: I've seen a couple of vids from Markiplier back in the day, mostly because he was the only person with a personality that bothered playing Off by Mortis Ghost.
I'm mostly devoted to VanossGaming & friends, Kubz Scouts and Poofesure every now and then.
Anybody know where I can watch some of the nominated live-action/animated shorts?
Louis: Thoughts on Tenet’s cinematography and score if you haven’t given them?
What are everyone's picks for Sup. Actress? I think it depends entirely on who SAG awards.
SAG goes to Close: They don't even need to announce the nominees, just give it to her already
SAG goes to Bakalova: Maria's name is pretty much engraved on the Oscar statuette
SAG goes to Youn: Youn vs. Bakalova race, probably will depend on the BAFTA results
SAG goes to Colman: all hell breaks loose
SAG goes to Zengel: Congratulations on your first Oscar, Amanda Seyfried
Well, I ripped off the bandaid and watched Hillbilly Elegy.
Nope.
I really want to think they'll award Youn as a way to award Minari and not have it winless (since I do think it is at the very least a top 4 contender now). But I'm not going to overthink it too much now to disappoint myself when it doesn't happen. Anyone but Close would be a good winner.
Razor:
Feeling Through - www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1CqzntEZZ8
A Love Song for Latasha - www.netflix.com/title/81304985
Colette - www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7uBf1gD6JY
If Anything Happens I Love You - www.netflix.com/title/81349306
A Concerto is a Conversation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoEZR5miMvo
All of these are pretty good/great by the way and worth watching.
I might be missing a few, I'll post 'em here later if I can.
I honestly think Bakalova might go the whole way.
Matt: As Louis has said, she's gotten this far and clearly has the support, so why not.
Matt: The fact that she got nominated in the first place and that she's the only one of the 5 nominees to be nominated everywhere makes it very hard for me to say she won't win. I'd honestly hope that's the case, she'd make a great winner and more comedic performances deserve to be recognized by the Academy.
I was also thinking Colman could be a possibility if they really end up loving The Father as much as the over performance suggests. But if it's getting a win anywhere I'm thinking a dark horse Editing win might be the one on the cards since Chicago 7's momentum in that regard is beginning to die down a bit and The Father has a bit more 'flashy' editing.
R.I.P. Yaphet Kotto
RIP Yaphet Kotto
RIP Yaphet Kotto
RIP Yaphet Kotto
RIP Yaphet Kotto
For the final time:
1. Raci
2. Kaluuya
3. Stanfield
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
RIP Yaphet Kotto
Luke, you really are desperate to win again, I can't blame you. I've decided to change mine again as well because after having read both sides of the argument, I'm leaning towards Kaluuya.
1. Raci
2. Kaluuya
3. Stanfield
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
And RIP Yaphet Kotto
Yet another "Alien" alumni has sadly left us, and he will surely be missed by his family, friends and fans alike.
Rest in peace, Yaphet Kotto.
Calvin: Have you seen the first Shaun The Sheep film. It's really good and the sequel was fine though better than Early Man.
Luke: I haven't, but I really should.
RIP Yaphet Kotto.
Louis: Assuming that you preferred Vinterberg's direction in Another Round to his work in The Hunt, which one do you prefer overall as a film.
1. Raci
2. Kaluuya
3. Stanfield
4. Odom Jr.
5. Cohen
Louis: Could you give ratings and thoughts on tom hanks in news of the world? (Because i am 99% sure you only saved him due to the possibilty of him being nominated).
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on Bill Murray in On The Rocks and David Strathairn in Nomadland.
I remember when some people were predicting Ben Affleck and Tom Hanks to be potential upsets in the Lead Actor lineup. Glad we don’t live in that universe.
Well like Robert, I also bit the bullet and watched "Hillbilly Elegy"... and that's two hours of my life I'm never getting back.
It’s Winter’s Bone for assholes.
Robert: Its winter's bone without good performances from Jennifer Lawrence and john Hawkes.
Anonymous: Except Winter's Bone is great even beyond those two performances, it's well-written and extremely well-directed.
R.I.P. Yaphet Kotto
R.I.P. Yaphet Kotto
And yes, there's much more wrong with Hilbilly's Elegy than those 2 performances. The stupid manipulative melodrama writing and the blandest, most boring direction I've ever seen come to mind.
Emi: You mean 4 performances. The other two being basso and asztalos.
Even putting "Hillbilly Elegy" in the same sentence as "Winter's Bone" does that great film a disservice.
If anything, the movie is more akin to those fake trailers at the start of "Tropic Thunder" - except someone actually spent time and money making one of them.
Also...Haley Bennett needs a new agent.
It looks like a 30 Rock movie.
I would be more angry, I suppose, but mostly I'm just kicking myself since I could've easily re-watched "Fate/Zero" and "Fate/stay: Unlimited Blade Works" back to back - and I would've been far more enraptured with those 24+ hours of animation than that 2 hours of dreck.
Oh, and just to get this out of the way...
Close - 1.5
Adams - 1.5
Basso - 1.5
Hopkins - 2
Pinto - 2.5
Bennett - 2.5
Anonymous:
Ask me again in Oldman's review.
Emi Grant:
Quite effective in being honestly surprising in the switch, where you're actually taken a bit back in the reveal even as it was in plain sight the whole time.
Razor:
Let me re-watch first.
Calvin:
A gorgeous piece and in a certain sense a combination of the two sides of the score. This as you have the syncopation but now through a piano rather than the overt techno. This as it calmly yet powerfully builds its simple melody.
Anonymous & Luke:
Will get to those on the next post.
Emi:
It's one of the better scenes by Sorkin in terms of setting up the split. From Tom's directed passion against Abbie's direct sort of an honest moment of being upset in thinking he's doing it all for show. A good scene that manages the philosophies in effective character moment.
Tahmeed:
I mean I love them both so it is microscopic difference. Also the experience is a bit different as one is wholly devastating while the other more of a mix of emotions. I think I might say that The Hunt has the height, while Another Round might have the distance.
Post a Comment