LaKeith Stanfield received his first Oscar nomination for portraying William O'Neal in Judas and the Black Messiah.
Now onto the "Judas" half of the film. Speaking of up and coming actors, LaKeith Stanfield, in a fairly short amount of time, much like Daniel Kaluuya, has fast been crafting a varied and remarkable filmography. He's an actor I'm always happy to see appear in any film and quite eager to see what he does next. Compared to his co-lead, Stanfield has a very different challenge. This as I'm not sure the film quite knows what to do with William O'Neal but Stanfield does. This as where Kaluuya has a, for about half of the film at least, a clearly defined narrative and motivation to build from, for the character of William O'Neal, things are a little sloppier, though not for Stanfield. Stanfield makes a cohesive character here, but it is through from seeming to make a fundamental choice from his opening scene where O'Neal goes to shake down a bar by posing as an FBI agent. That fundamental choice being that Stanfield seems to define O'Neal as a fool. This could seem an easy way out, but what Stanfield does with it is truly incredible. This as he finds a path for the character that would've been far more difficult without the insight of his performance. I actually think he fashions kind of a fascinating sort of anti- or at least unorthodox charisma with the role. Take his opening scene where he tries to shake down a bar by posing as an FBI agent. There is just so much nuance even in the awkwardness of his manner as he tries to posture so laughable. Even with way Stanfield holds tight to his hat on his face has sense of fallacy that he can do anything here other than getting chased and almost killed, which is naturally what happens.
Stanfield's escape in this first scene is a brilliant bit of physical acting. This just in that he captures this sense of fear obviously as he runs but this kind of weaselesque energy in the movements. There is something fascinating just to watch Stanfield make his escape as you see a guy putting everything he's got into it, even in his rather messy way. I especially love as he drives off with one of patrons stolen car away, finally making his escape. Stanfield expresses so much relief with a bit of joy that he really effectively pulls you into the frame of O'Neal mind, even as he's a particularly lowly sort. This dynamic approach he finds even continues in what could be a perfunctory scene, where his eventual FBI handler (Jesse Plemons) goes about interrogating him for his previous crime, though is in fact trying to recruit him as an FBI informer/plant. Stanfield's a face of a man seemingly just lost within the interrogation room waiting whatever punishment may await him. In explaining his method of using a badge to rob, Stanfield's delivery is brilliant, this clearly his voice as he speaks with a nearly stilted fear. As well as Stanfield places you within O'Neal within the moment, the most essential moment is when the handler asks if he cares about the deaths of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. The former Stanfield begrudgingly admits to some sadness as a generalized feeling, but for Malcolm X there is nothing. In this Stanfield shows a man who believes in one thing, his own survival.
O'Neal is then set to infiltrate the Black Panther party, specifically the chapter lead by Fred Hampton in Chicago. Stanfield is terrific in the early scenes of the man observing the organization. This as again as the fool he doesn't react as a man who really has any high minded ideas, therefore the presentation of them is rather meaningless. Instead Stanfield shows the observer quite effectively as the man looking for his opportunities for his own survival. This as he conveys this as depth-less as the man should be, however this isn't even remotely a criticism. Rather it is fascinating the way Stanfield stands out within the shadows. This as he's to the side, and I just love how much Stanfield does in every silent aside as O'Neal. This as he conveys the working of his brains, and his motivation as this unique thing. Something we understand because we know where he came from, but also wouldn't raise too many questions for others. O'Neal even breaking his cover slightly by hitting on a female member of the party, leading to minor punishment. Stanfield even portrays that as no more than the common lusts for the common man that is O'Neal. O'Neal who is most capable only in finding ways to slip through the clutches of authority. In the moment of convincing the FBI to give him a car, so he can be Fred's driver supposedly, Stanfield speaks with confidence for once in this idea, but mainly as Stanfield shows the far more palatable desire for the car more than anything.
Stanfield's portrayal captures this sort of marvelous duality of laying low while presenting to us what he's feeling, and is fantastic work. Take a moment on reflecting on the Panther's gun collection he speaks in the phony surprise of admiration of some kind, against the undercurrent in Stanfield's work conveying a fear for his life by the danger the guns present to him as an informer. I think it is fair to say, Stanfield is one of the very best actors working today in terms of portraying jittery fear. The man just has a face for it as he evokes so much anxiety in an silent instance, that most actors would need a dozen screams to represent. Stanfield in this creates create antithetical focal points in the Hamptons speech scenes, because as compelling as Kaluuya is leading the crowd, Stanfield is as compelling in creating O'Neal's kind of paranoid fear deep within the lion's den. A highlight scene for Stanfield, and the film, is when O'Neal's Bona fides are directly questioned as he's held at gun point to prove himself as a car thief. Stanfield is amazing in the scene. This as he captures the tension of the moment. This in both trying to evoke confidence, while always almost failing miserable, while also trying so hard and so desperately to convince. Again though what he is so convincing is as this fool, that there's some nugget of truth within all his fear to make himself convincing. Stanfield is the greatest tight rope walker, a tight rope walker who only ever walks on the tips of his toes and the back of his heels, while waving his arms ferociously to stay up.
Stanfield finds his path within O'Neal's story, which I think the film could've made more compelling if they had connected Fred and O'Neal beyond him driving for him. Stanfield finds his path though in showing again how the fool navigates this life. This in his moments with the FBI, there is joy and pride in his accomplishments initially as he earns payments and favor for his successes. As the situation grows more dangerous though, Stanfield wields that desperation so effectively. Again Stanfield creates such a fantastic focal point in making himself such a fascinating parasite of an alternate protagonist. Where I think, if not for Stanfield, the logic of the character would be lost in the progression towards the end. This as the film doesn't quite decide what O'Neal is all about in terms of his relationship with the Black Panthers. Of course this is on the record itself where it is disputed whether or not he committed suicide out of guilt or not for his time as an informer. Stanfield explains this actually within his performance. This as he presents the man who really isn't wise enough to know if he has real friends in the party, or if he has loyalty for any friend. Stanfield projects the desperation of the fool who doesn't know what t think in a given moment. Stanfield presents a man so gripped by fear for himself that he never quite seems to make a decision wholly for himself. Stanfield is great here because he makes sense of the possibly senseless. I think the flash forward scenes, based on O'Neal real single interview, are essential. This as he speaks, Stanfield's expression is one of a confusion that weighs upon the man and haunts him. Stanfield doesn't show it as quite guilt, but not exactly that either. It is rather something eating at a man, who himself lacks the ability to truly confront himself over his own actions. This is a brilliant turn by LaKeith Stanfield, as he creates a captivating turn, not based on hope and selflessness, but rather fear and self-preservation.
27 comments:
Happy for him but damn, lost again.
Im really happy because i predicted him to get a 4.5/5 when everyone else was merely predicting a 4.5.
Except Robert of course.
Louis: really love how you pointed out that while Fred Hampton was about hope and selflessness, William was about fear and selfishness.
There's still hope for my prediction, it seems...
And much like you, Louis, I'm also happy for Stanfield's recent breakthrough. I'm very much looking forward to see what he does next.
This role was such a tightrope. Cowardice is arguably the single hardest emotion to humanize on screen, and he did so expertly. Even though this is the biggest eyebrow raise of category fraud since Rooney Mara, I’m just kind of glad Stanfield has an Oscar nomination for a role that feels like it normally would have been overlooked.
(Also, he canceled Leto’s nomination thank Christ)
I have to say, I think he's probably the most interesting actor working right now.
Also, I love that he has some Michael Shannon-levels of idgaf energy in interviews and social media.
Well, this might be a close one. I do think Stanfield made so much out of what feels like such a messy role. As written, I wouldn't be able to tell you much about his character, as performed, LaKeith makes a very vivid sense of whatever pressure he's in.
I think the Safdies should just let him star on whatever they do next.
Looking forward to the Alternate Lead Actor review for Plemons.
Aidan: Not sure if plemons is gonna get an review.
Anonymous: Maybe not for this, hopefully for i'm' thinking of ending things, though. I think he's still saved.
Anonymous:
I'm quite sure that was a joke, since Plemons is technically the only option for the male lead in this film if Stanfield and Kaluuya somehow aren't.
I will say as much as I dislike category fraud I didn't hate it here, one because the likely sixth contenders were far from Stanfield in quality, second because it makes Stanfield an Oscar nominee.
Anonymous: I know, it's just a joke that's been going around lately with both Kaluuya and Stanfield nominated in Supporting.
Emi: I think he still is saved, and I would hope for a review too because that is a great performance from him.
Emi: i knew he was referring to im thinking of ending things, i just don’t think he will be reviewed unless it is a 10 lineup.
Oh just realised what he meant my bad.
Anonymous: I think if Aidan wants to request him for ITOET, I'm sure Louis wouldn't have a problem doing a 5 lineup and an extra review which he has done enough times in the past.
Louis: You're telling me the lead is not J. Edgar Hoover?!
Even with this Warner Bros fraud I still prefer Stanfield among the nominees than Leto, Murray or Boseman.
Louis: Your thoughts on the voices of Genevieve Bujold, Mia Kirshner, Stephen McHattie and Bruce Greenwood.
Louis: And to add to Anonymous' comment - Graham Greene.
For as calming and earnest as Greene's voice is a lot of the time, I also think he's rather adept with dry sarcasm when needed.
Also, in keeping with the trend of the above comments, I'm always a bit taken back by the number of Canadian actors with memorable voices.
To be honest, it may be because I still struggle with recognizing the ways people can differentiate our accent. At least to my ears, it's never sounded terribly distinctive.
I really liked this writeup. My preference is still Kaluuya as I just didn’t find O’Neal as compelling, but I entirely agree that as vague as the writing was, Stanfield crafted the narrative himself and frankly, maybe that was the point as you’ve said, that O’Neal was a simple man out of his element who’s unable to confront himself about his actions.
Also with regards to the Minari screentime divisions I’m glad this puts some of those ‘Yeun should’ve run supporting’ arguments I’ve seen on the internet to rest.
Louis: So when Hanson gave Spacey the script of L.A. Confidential, he told him to think of Dean Martin while Crowe studied Sterling Hayden's performance in The Killing. How do you think Hayden and Martin would have fared as White and Vincennes respectively? Hayden would have been an excellent White.
As much as I joked about his category placement, I am really glad that Stanfield is an Oscar nominee for a deserving performance. Also, his reactions to his nomination were hilarious to say the least.
Luke:
Remember Luke, I don't accept requests for the next year in line.
Shaggy:
Actually Stanfield's category wasn't even WB, they campaigned him lead. There just must've been a concerted effort, or whole bunch of accidentally in line passionate voters, who wanted to get him in, which is rather impressive.
Anonymous:
Bujold's kind of an accent you don't get much, which is the French Canadian accent, which has a wonderful unique flavor to it.
Kirshner kind of has a fascinating tender vivaciousness.
McHattie sounds like Lance Henriksen, I'm pretty sure he's his doppelganger.
Greenwood has perhaps the most straight forward man's voice around, which is not a bad thing.
Greene's got a wonderful voice that does kind have a nice wavelength between earnest and sarcastic...I wished he get more work.
Anonymous:
Hayden could've been amazing potentially if he really brought out the vulnerability, and you can totally see that approach in Crowe. Martin could be good actually with the right direction, and I could see that.
Post a Comment