Tuesday 16 March 2021

Best Supporting Actor 2020: Leslie Odom Jr. in One Night in Miami

Leslie Odom Jr. received his first acting Oscar nomination for portraying Sam Cooke in One Night in Miami.

One Night in Miami is a good film that depicts the meeting of four iconic African Americans, fittingly, one night in Miami after, then, Cassius Clay becomes boxing heavyweight champion of the world. 

Leslie Odom Jr., the singer songwriter fittingly portrays singer songwriter Sam Cooke. Odom having an accidental banner year, by the early release of the filmed stage version of his breakout stage role as Aaron Burr in Hamilton. This allowing a bit of stretch of his range by playing a far more recent figure, even if the role does make natural use of his golden pipes in the role Cooke. I'll get more into this, but this is ideal casting due to that. While Odom doesn't try to replicate Cooke's exact vocal style, he isn't completely dissimilar to begin with, which is a great asset for the film to have at its disposal, though more on this later. The film opens as we see each of the 4 icons dealing with their lives with particular problems in their lives before that night. We find Cooke as he flops at the Copacabana. We get to see though Odom walk into the role with the right confidence. This as we see him waiting with baited breath, but also a confident sense of frustration. This as Odom brings the right power of personality even as he lashes against his manager, suggesting Cooke's strength within controlling his own industry. In his short, unsuccessful performance, due to a hostile crowd, Odom brings on the showman effectively albeit briefly. This sort of juxtaposition something that Odom brings naturally and we will see more of as the story unfolds. 

The story reveals itself as we see the four iconic men meetup after Clay, soon to be Muhammad Ali, wins the championship, leading to him, Odom's Cooke, Aldis Hodge's Jim Brown and Kingsley Ben-Adir's Malcolm X meeting up in a hotel room as fashioned by the latter. Even in the way the men arrive we get a sense of Cooke, who comes early through his fast sports car, and treats Malcolm's humorless security with a jovial kind of indifference. Odom's performance delivers on being the super star within Sam Cooke. This is as he brims with the right charisma that even more so shows a guy just high on life. Cooke captures a carefree attitude in the public with this ease of self. Odom carries, fittingly, a smile more attitude as a man who seems to coasting on life at this point. A sincere ease in his manner, which is notably different from Malcolm X who is weighed upon by both his sense of purpose and his impending break from the nation of Islam. Meanwhile Ali and Brown are somewhere in-between. This is kind of where the film develops itself into to examine the men as successful African Americans in America in the 60's. This as largely a conflict then to the most different of the two in the "stiff" Malcolm against the easygoing Sam. Now only lightly at first, where Odom naturally modulates his performance in the company of his friends, downplaying the overt charisma just a bit, but still carrying the same essential essence of a more carefree soul. 

This break between the two is seemingly minor at first, or at least minor in nature. This as we see Malcolm trying to keep the men from vices, while Sam carries hidden alcohol in his guitar case. This develops to more though as the men come to represent two different approaches to a potentially mutual cause. Now the film very much takes this as a Two Popes approach, where for purposes of drama it simplifies the conflict a bit to make it especially direct. This as Sam comes to represent the man working within the establishment for success while Malcolm wants to directly attack it, meanwhile Ali is a point of contention in this fight, and Brown almost stays as this referee throughout. Odom is good though in presenting Cooke when attacked by Malcolm. There's a nice mix of emotions that we see. When really pleading his own case, which is through making his own label he's been bringing opportunity and cash to his brethren he is making a difference even within the system. Odom is good in that there is a definite defensive quality in his delivery of these words, but there's a bit more. There is a sense of persistence and even drive within the man. Odom captures a sense of conviction in one's self in each claim, and even a distinct pride and joy in speaking these successes. Odom grants a seriousness within Sam in these moments as much a businessman as an entertainer. 

Malcolm continues to press Sam, particularly on his lack of songs with cultural substance or importance. Again Odom presents effectively the basic annoyance and eventual overt disdain for Malcolm in these moments. Odom balances it just right though in showing a sense of understandable defense, but also a honest nerve being hit in many of Malcolm's words. Eventually the two form a bit of a truce by Malcolm recalling the first performance he saw of Sam's. A nice moment though in just their interactions that is done well by both actors muting it a bit actually. There's a sense of genuine camaraderie in their glances and just an earnest bit of warm nostalgia for Sam's earlier success. This as we see Odom's two musical performances they kind of close out the film. The first is the remembrance of a time where Sam was sabotaged well trying to perform. Odom is wonderful in the scene in showing the showman in every respect. This in his manner that is distinctly Sam Cooke, with the particularly expressive movements that never feel forced or over the top, rather just a natural part of his performance style. In this though Odom delivers that full fledged charisma in basically wielding the crowd, and making a convincing moment as he gets the crowd to act as his own percussion. The second though is Sam doing what Malcolm challenged him on which is in his performance of his powerful ballad "A Change is Gonna Come". This connecting the two, as the men would not see the change, both dying violently within months of one another. In this scene though Odom is great in showing the sort of lighter performer slowly losing itself towards a genuine just soulful turn by the end of the song. A striking ending to his work, that very much shows why Odom was the right choice for this part. Of course, even beyond on the singing, this is a very strong performance by Leslie Odom Jr. that delivers beyond just being ideal casting.

64 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Any upgrades at all.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on Hanks, Murray and Strathairn.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Which performance by Leslie Odom junior did you prefer: Hamilton or one night in Miami?

Mitchell Murray said...

About the rating I was expecting given what I've heard of the performance/film, which from the premise alone, I'm rather curious about.

I'm just happy that Odom Jr's found greater success here (and "Hamilton", of course) than his thankless role from "Harriet".

Tim said...

Any chance left for an upgrade of Robert Donat in Goodbye Mr Chips?

Robert MacFarlane said...

I thought he was good, but I was more taken with Ben-Adir and Hodge.

Mitchell Murray said...

Also, just going back to the last post - that terminator line is still so god damn dumb!

Last time I actively vent on "Hillbilly Elegy", I promise.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Yes, I'd move Hodge also up to a 4.5.

Hanks - 4(Side note, I have to say I knew I was in trouble with News of the World, when in the opening Hanks's character said he was going to let people forget their troubles by reading the news only to proceed to tell them about a cholera epidemic. Anyways is a rock solid leading turn by Hanks. He brings what you'd expect, and what serves the role well with that. There's that Hanks's charm and warmth. He has a nice chemistry with Zengel as Hanks is generous as ever in his interactions with his co-star. Hanks carries the right honesty towards the role even to sell the action beats by granting them the right intensity through the innate sympathy and empathy in his performance. It isn't the biggest challenge for him, but he delivers on the challenge there is.)

Murray - 4(The best part of the film, even if like Hanks, this is just purely in Murray's wheelhouse...honestly I'd like to see these two swap films maybe that could've shaken things up a bit. Anyways, Murray does do well within the expected part. This as he brings his typical charm of his sad Murray phase. He has a nice chemistry and sense of history with Jones, and even if I didn't always care about what he was saying, he said it well. He brings the right sort of mischievousness just as he has kind of a skewed kind of warmth. This isn't the biggest challenge for him, but he delivers on the challenge there is.)

Strathairn - 4(It's a good performance that more than anything he avoids becoming too attention seeking as the other name actor in the piece. He has a nice almost chemistry with McDormand. This as you can see the seeking of a greater affection even as she never quite returns it all the way. Strathairn captures the eagerness well though with an earnest quality that wholly works. This just with a strict sincerity of the attempt, while never overdoing it at any point. He finds the right strict naturalism in his work, to the point you could see him working in his own story in the way McDormand does in hers.)

Anonymous:

If I saw him on stage in Hamilton, probably that, but as film performances, this.

Tim:

No.

Matt Mustin said...

David Strathairn is pretty much always rock solid as far as I can tell.

Luke Higham said...

With that upgrade, it bodes well for Hodge's Clemency review.

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: I forget, have you given your thoughts on Kingsley Ben-Adir, or are you saving him?

Anonymous said...

Matt: Louis saved him.

Luke Higham said...

Matt: Pretty sure he's saving him, he's a possible five.

Matt Mustin said...

OK, that's what I figured.

Calvin Law said...

Delighted to see Hodge raised up! And glad Odom Jr. got a good review here, I’m in the same boat as Robert but that doesn’t take away from the excellence of his performance here.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: that opening to your Hanks thoughts gave me a chuckle because I had the exact thought. Probably the closest News of the World has to a funny bit.

Calvin Law said...

Joker and Promising Young Woman being compared online is how I become the Joker.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Calvin: Nope. We’re not having this discourse. Don’t do it. Don’t. No.

NO.

Calvin Law said...

But you don’t understand Robert, they both have scenes of characters applying makeup!

Mitchell Murray said...

Let me throw this distraction at you guys before we go down too dark of a path...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiK-62XJWZs

I'll admit, they probably shouldn't have done this video at all since the fight's stupidly one sided, but I still like what they did.

Aidan Pittman said...

I watched Hillbilly Elegy.

Adams - 1
Close - 1.5/2
Basso - 1
Asztalos - 1
Bennett - 2

Robert MacFarlane said...

Given that JD Vance is apparently going to be running for a GOP senate seat in 2022, I will hereby refer to him exclusively as “Fucking Guy” in a Nandor the Relentless voice.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: what would be your lineup choices for Sound Editing/Mixing for 2020? Been working out my personal lineups and it actually seems to be quite a packed year.

And on that note your thoughts on Another Round's sound design, because you had me thinking in your thoughts on Vinterberg previousy, how good the sound work in that film is.

Calvin Law said...

Does anyone know if Quo Vadis, Aida? is 100% a 2021 release?

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Sound Editing:

Color Out of Space
The Invisible Man
Soul
Sound of Metal
Tenet

Sound Mixing:

Another Round
Color Out of Space
The Invisible Man
Saint Maud
Sound of Metal

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Actually looking closer to the releases listed on imdb I think it is 2020 after all. This as its only home country release (Bosnia and Herzegovina), is in 2020, and I don't see an alternate.

Anonymous said...

What do you think about minari's Oscar chances? In my opinion as much as I would like to say otherwise, I think it could possibly go 0 for 6.
Best picture: Very likely going to nomadland.
Best director: Zhao has it in the bag.
Best actor: Boseman has it in the bag.
Best supporting actress: Could win but we need to see how youn does at bafta and sag to be sure.
Best original screenplay: Either going to trial or promising young woman.
Best score: Soul has it in the bag.

Anonymous said...

Louis: top 5 film actors with a great but underused character range?

Calvin Law said...

Anonymous: I think it could do a Lady Bird (it’s closest equivalent) and there’s no shame in that. It doesn’t have an Editing nomination which in the last decade is a requisite (except for Birdman which was just a case of people not understanding how brilliantly the editing works in that).

Louis: I’ll try and do a bit more research. It could have just been a festival release, I just thought I’d check it up.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: https://deadline.com/2020/10/war-drama-quo-vadis-aida-set-as-bosnias-entry-for-2020-international-oscar-race-1234597172/

This suggests that the 10 October 2020 date was a special premiere, in which case it would still be a 2021 release! So I think your placement was in the right.

Calvin Law said...

This further supports it - https://www.srebrenicamemorial.org/en/article/291/youth-from-the-region-gather-in-srebrenica-for-bih-premiere-screening-of-quo-vadis-aida

BRAZINTERMA said...

Louis: When you publish your video and the list of winners in 2020, do you intend to keep the categories of sound editing and mixing?

Anonymous said...

So I just looked at the screen time data for the best actress nominees and man does viola Davis really stick out like a sore thumb in terms of screen time. For context the screen time data for the best actress nominees are:
Andra day:1:27:42/67.38%
Carey mulligan:1:23:09/73.36
Frances mcdormand:1:20:56/75.21
Vanessa Kirby:1:18:32/61.53
Viola davis:26:41/28.36

Tim said...

Your thoughts on my cast for a modern The Shining? (with character development)


Jack: Jeremy Renner
Wendy: Margot Robbie
Danny: actually an unknown kid would be best, but if we age him up a little maybe Jacob Trembley
Halloran: Samuel L. Jackson
Ullman: Kyle Chandler
Grady: Vincent Cassel

Director: Ari Aster

Matt Mustin said...

Tim: Jackson's a little too intense for Halloran, I think.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I maintain Jack being a shit from the start was an improvement. But then again, I don’t like the book.

Matt Mustin said...

Robert: He's an asshole from the beginning in the book too, despite what King claims.

Matt Mustin said...

Also, Bill Duke for Halloran.

Tim said...

He is an asshole, but he isn't round-eyebrows-crazy

Matt Mustin said...

Tim: Correct.

Bryan L. said...

“Director: Ari Aster”

Tim, I can’t agree with that one.

Bryan L. said...

(Also, is it just me or does anyone else feel post-Clockwork Kubrick is a hotbed of disagreement on here?)

Matt Mustin said...

Bryan: Yeah, but that's just how it is pretty much anywhere. For the record, I think The Shining and Eyes Wide Shut are both masterpieces.

Tim said...

Bryan: really, why not not Aster?

Also, gotta say Matt is right there. With late Kubrick in general filmfans everywhere just seem to agree to disagree

Tim said...

*just one "not"

Bryan L. said...

Tim: Aster would most likely just replicate one of the problems that’s already in the film; Jack being this inevitable character that already wants to kill his family. That’d go against what you mentioned about character development, I feel. Also, he’d probably go overkill on the atmosphere-building.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Appreciated, and frankly prefer it as 2021 release, as it makes for a strong opening #1.

Anonymous:

I think what you speak of helps Youn's chances actually. Minari is a top five film even without editing due to it overall haul. So it should theoretically win somewhere as the passion is clearly there. The Father is the one that will probably unfortunately goose egg, though I do think it has an outside chance in screenplay and editing. I could even see Youn winning a la Tilda Swinton, the sole rep for her film and Bafta/Oscar combination.

Anonymous:

Robert Downey Jr.
Charles Dance
Simon Pegg
Morgan Freeman
Harvey Keitel

Brazinterma:

They will stay separate, because they are separate achievements. I will say, my winners in the sounds are not the same film. My winners will be revealed once I'm done with both alternate lineups.

Tim:

I have zero affection for Aster at this point. Again, any more films opening with the death of a family member...I'm out. So obviously he'd re-write the Shining to open with the death of Jack's dad. Fine casting though.

Anonymous said...

Louis, your updated top ten underrated actors and actresses of all-time.

Anonymous said...

Luke, your final picks for the Supporting lineup.

Luke Higham said...

Laurie/Whishaw
Rylance
Mendelsohn
Hoult
Dennehy

Mitchell Murray said...

Luke: Just to clarify...Hoult from "True History of the Kelly Gang"?

I mean, he was good as usual, but not my favourite performance in the film.

Matt Mustin said...

Mitchell: I agree with you, but most people on this blog seemed to really love him.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I really don’t get why Whishaw would be reviewed, he was so miscast. Granted, I didn’t like the acting in David Copperfield sans Patel and Laurie (who, while good, should not be the one who wins).

Mitchell Murray said...

I'd be down for Laurie making his debut on this blog, at least. Since we won't be getting reviews of his turns from "House" or "The Night Manager", it may be as good a chance he has given the rest of his film work.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Truth be told I could live without a Hoult review. He’s good in True History, but it’s just a warm-up to his better work in The Great. Crowe left more of an impression.

Mitchell Murray said...

It seems we're on the same page there, Robert.

Matt Mustin said...

Agreed, I like Crowe more.

Luke Higham said...

I have no problem with Crowe getting the review instead of Hoult if Louis is in agreement with you.

Calvin Law said...

With my last rewatch of Sound of Metal, Raci is currently my win, and the more I think about it the more I’ve realised Ahmed should be higher on my personal rankings.

Mitchell Murray said...

Little side note about "Sound of Metal": Even though I haven't seen the film yet, I can't help but feel happy for Ahmed. He's someone who I kept seeing pop up here or there (Most recognizably in "The Sister's Brothers"), and I always thought if he played his cards right, he could really go places...

And sure enough, here we are in 2021 and he's got an oscar nomination under his belt. So yah, in a similar vein to my comments on Cohen and Seyfried - good on that dude.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: I'm not necessarily predicting it yet, because historical trends suggest otherwise, but I do think The Father has a chance at editing. Chicago 7 is the one everyone assumed would be the sweeper, but thus far Sound of Metal making its mark has shown that this would be the year to award the 'atypical' film's editing. If voters lean towards spreading to love (since I feel Sound of Metal is a lock for sound), they want to go for something a bit different to the more 'showy' editing, the fact that The Father over performed and how important the editing is in the film, I'm leaning towards thinking it actually does have a shot.

Michael McCarthy said...

Hoult is still my (soft) supporting win, so I’m gonna go ahead and unambiguously endorse him for a review spot.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Will the review be up tonight.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Hope you're right, although I'll say I don't even think "Trial" would be a bad win, but there are better choices this year.