Monday 22 March 2021

Best Actor 2020: Chadwick Boseman in Ma Rainey's Black Bottom

Chadwick Boseman received his only Oscar nomination for portraying Levee Green in Ma Rainey's Black Bottom.

Ma Rainey's Black Bottom, which depicts a tumultuous recording session in 1927, feels like a bit of a missed opportunity. The play feels like a good starting point for a great screenwriter to expand it to something truly cinematic and special, akin to something like Amadeus. The material itself feels quite stagey with the little adapting done to the material. It doesn't help having George C. Wolfe as the director, who is better known as a stage director and it shows. There's just so many little moments that have a certain awkwardness to them, and there isn't any choices that really invigorate the film on a visual level. Additionally the more I spend time with the film, the more I feel that Viola Davis was wildly miscast, both due to lacking the vocal ability, and also perhaps is too aggressively serious as an actress for a role like Ma Rainey, which I think deserved a bit more vivaciousness. 
 
This film is notable for marking the final film of Chadwick Boseman. An actor who left us far too soon, and unlike many, it wasn't due to any tragic vice, just simple tragedy. An actor who managed to make a substantial cultural impact in such a short time in the spotlight from his progression of portrayals of various notable African Americans, and of course his role as T'Challa in Black Panther/MCU, which has already become a kind of cultural touchstone. I will admit for most of his career I saw Boseman as a rock solid leading man/movie star style performer. Someone you could always depend on even if you more or less get what you would expect. This by the way is not at all a slight, this as his presence alone was something remarkable in itself. And as limited as the roles were in some respects, you could see a talented actor there. This kind of expected Chadwick Boseman role was even found in his other 2020 film Da Five Bloods, which relied on that presence as a confident man of action. Boseman just was able to carry that quiet stoicism in a way that still was magnetic even if it often presented a degree of limitation in terms of the roles he was tasked to play. Of course all of that was not taking into account his final performance here as Levee Green in Ma Rainey. This being a performance that is entirely unlike anything else Boseman had done, and suggests perhaps there was an even greater actor beyond that of the one we had become familiar with.

Now forget Ma Rainey, because there is Levee Green here as the hot shot trumpet player and song writer determined to make a name for himself. I mean I already mentioned Boseman being magnetic, but actually his other performances honestly seem like warm ups compared to this one. Boseman's charisma here is at an all time high here, as he just seems to pierce through the screen here. This even in his first scene where he tries to steal the spotlight from Davis's Rainey during a musical performance through his Trumpet solo. Boseman successfully doing so, in part because his also dubbed trumpet playing is far more convincing than Davis's atrocious lip syncing, but also because this is just Boseman in this part, where he is the star of this show. Boseman storms into his first scene, into the major portion of the film which is the recording session, with the other band mates and eventually Ma Rainey. Levee walks in to show off his brand new shoes. He storms in with his considerable presence, and I think there is so much in just how Boseman approaches this first moment. This as he is brimming with energy and confidence. He's ready to make stamp on things and Boseman is fantastic in just exuding this glow of ambition. There's more to this then that though. This as Boseman from the outset is showing this man who is a whole lot more than you think. This just though in any situation he shows a man who charms first, and reveals himself later. The smile of his almost seemingly glued to his face, to create a kind of weaponized affability from the outset. 

Although the film is stagey, it is remarkable how well Boseman handles the dialogue, which can be a mouth fill in occasionally at times. It never seems as such though as Boseman delivers it with such ease and never does it interfere with his potent sense of character. Boseman seems born to play Levee here as he has so much comfort in this role, which is truly special when this is quite the complex man. This even in his initial discussion with the band-mates who each serve their kind of philosophies. Boseman measures his work so brilliantly in the way he makes his smile a weapon in a way. This as when they initially discuss about Levee's ambitions, which includes using his own arrangements for the recording session, Boseman wields his intensity so effectively. He becomes more upfront about it, albeit briefly, when anyone seems to relent in his favor, Boseman switches back to that smile and that charisma. He seems to encourage once again and becomes just the most agreeable sort again. Boseman is brilliant as just from the cursory look Levee makes you think he's just an affable young man who is eager to please. There is so much going on beneath the surface. An amazing moment early on is when Levee speaks to being all set to deal with the devil, much to the religious band mate Cutler(Colman Domingo)'s dismay. As Cutler questions this, there's a moment where Boseman loses his smile as he insists on his unpleasant background, it is honestly downright chilling as Boseman suggests something terrible that is bubbling just beneath the surface. 

There is a darkness within Boseman's work that is fascinating with the way he plays with it here. Boseman frankly makes the film for me, because when it does work, it's because he is being onscreen and is just so captivating to watch here. He is like a mater of ceremonies quite frankly for the film. This even in the way he handles the scene he has that potent energy in every motion he takes. Boseman doesn't waste his space and he never wastes an opportunity. When Ma Rainey doesn't use Levee's choice, Boseman again puts forth the frustrations again a real anger at seeing an authority oppress him. When it seems though he can't really bluff his way out, Boseman's smile returns and Levee attempts to reclaim the scene by mocking Ma Rainey's nephew who is given a small part in the recording due to nepotism. Suddenly Boseman shows Levee back on top of the world. He is loving the take down of the man and you see the man in power of the situation again. Boseman fashions this incredible duality that he never makes simplistic, though and so powerfully makes it this fluid aspect of his performance. There is a brief moment later where one of the recording execs suggests an opportunity for Levee to sell his songs. Boseman again charisma full blast a man as he is just so eager to please seemingly in selling himself to his way to a presumed top. When the man leaves though, Boseman's face hardens suddenly yet so naturally in showing the strict serious ambition within the man. The hardening though suggesting as much fear connected within the ambition as there is drive.

As the story progresses the first real indicator to the nature of Levee comes as he delivers a monologue to the other band-mates about his mother and father. I think there is a danger in delivering a dramatic monologue such as this, if the actor is not good enough it come off as very stiff very fast, well thankfully, Boseman's not just good he's great. This as he recalls it all with such an immaculate delivery. Boseman's performance has a certain almost nostalgia quality at first in telling of his father's early success, until beginning to speak of when white men came to rape his mother. Boseman naturally seguing to the memory of this on his face, as his eyes slowly develop tears in his eyes. You can feel the pain within Boseman's delivery. As he explains his attempt to save his mother, Boseman speaks with a real vulnerability of a very real wound that is felt within every word of his pained delivery. As he continues, he speaks to the story of his father, as a man who smiled towards his wife's attackers and simply left. Boseman is stellar as he continues to speak of his father going back to get revenge. He speaks with this understated joy and pride in the story just as there also is such a deep pain in speaking to his father's death. Boseman in this single monologue goes through every emotion of it with such ease. Making it such a  vivid and powerful story, but going even further. This even in his delivery as he explains the weapon of the smile, Boseman shows the thought within Levee's methods, and how the man has come to approach the world.

I think the only flaw here might be that Boseman is too good (not an actual flaw by the way), this as Levee's ambition is basically trying to steal Ma Rainey's thunder, Davis just is not on Boseman's level here. As he comes at here with that incisive intent Davis doesn't deliver the same, to the point I kind of wish the film just had been about Levee. This is even to the point, there is a moment where I frankly thought Boseman steals a scene just in maintaining his satisfied smile while Ma Rainey complains about not getting a coke. Boseman is THE star of the film, and honestly takes no prisoners here, as anyone playing Levee should as it would be against the very nature of the character to share the spotlight. And I have to admit, I love it, particularly since it is perfect for who Levee is as a character. This as Levee is trying to get everything Ma Rainey has, even her seeming mistress. In this moment of seduction Boseman is just exuding all the charm here, he just owns the moment like he owns every moment. He has not only the charm though, but this kind of drive in his eyes as the intention seems to be an accomplishment that is even beyond seducing a beautiful woman. The aggression within the smoothness that is so notable in Boseman's work. His confidence both fueled by his ambition and fueling his ambition. Boseman though effectively shows the progression within this is where an instability comes as the particular nature of Levee's ambition leads to his downfall.
 
As the other men press Levee on his beliefs, he pushes back particularly against Cutler's belief in God. This as he is initially mocking with little dismissive asides though with a bit affability, the surface of Levee that Boseman is projecting. As Cutler continues though the darkness of the man reveals itself all the more. As he listens to the story of a African American preacher who danced among a group of racists to survive. Boseman's face takes in the story even is incredible in showing the man both angry at the story, but also attached to his own plight. This as he further attacks Boseman brings forth such an intensity in his hatred towards God. Boseman though even in this shows this vulnerability within the attack, a man so wounded by his past experience that he has almost a personal vendetta against everyone who isn't him, which especially includes God. Boseman in the moment of calling out God, is filled with such a potent mix in his face of absolute rage and anguish. Boseman finds naturally the self-destructive tendency of the man who as much as he tries can't quite control himself. This leading to his firing by Ma Rainey and something far more extreme. This as the studio exec rejects Levee's songs. A great scene for Boseman again this as the smile is fading and his facade is becoming ever more desperate. His delivery becoming strained and falser by the second. The hostile man behind it all within the smile now out and ready to be seen. This leading Levee to stab band-mate Toledo for stepping on his shoe, a scene I think a bit bungled by Wolfe who doesn't know how to shoot it or pace it, yet it still works due to Boseman. This as Boseman shows all the hate in the man's heart no longer hidden by anything. Tears in his eyes, just such anxiety and pain in his voice. Levee a man with nothing but all his pains out in the open. Boseman showing the ambitious man now with out ambition as nothing but a broken man. Boseman finding the right heartbreak within the moment, by showing as much hate as there is in Levee, you sense it came from the abuse the world has given him over the years. This is an amazing performance by Chadwick Boseman. This as he realizes every potential, every bit of complexity and every bit of power within this tragedy of a man whose  distaste for the world finally overwhelms him. Even as much as I don't love the film as a whole, greatness is found by Boseman. This is outstanding work, that proved that in the end we didn't lose a good actor when Boseman passed, we lost a great one. 

63 comments:

Anonymous said...

Louis: Anhy rating chances since first seeing the movie?

Anonymous said...

Looks like hopkins and oldman are the last two reviews. I am not sure what rating oldman is gonna get (Hopkins is a gaurnteed five at this point).

Calvin Law said...

Brilliant performance and as you say, one that dominates the film entirely.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

A performance that is so good, that he becomes the sole lead of the film by force. Probably one of the greatest swan song efforts ever.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Also, 'his only Oscar nomination'...just hurts to read. We lost a great actor when Boseman passed, and I'm really glad he's a lock to win.

Mitchell Murray said...

Unquestionably Boseman's best work, and a performance that completely steals the film from the title character. It's a shame we'll never get to see what else he may have done, but I can't help but admire Boseman's courage and work ethic even throughout his battle with colon cancer. I think we we're all rather blind sided in learning that, and I also think the greatness of this turn will be remembered for many years to come.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Do you think Boseman would still win if he had not died or would Hopkins be winning?

Calvin Law said...

I know Anonymous probably didn’t intend it this way and I think Louis won’t answer this until at least Hopkins is reviewed, but I will say this: posthumous wins are posthumous wins not merely because of the person’s passing, they have to be great perfomances. As Louis and several others have mentioned before, posthumous nominations aren’t actually that common even for revered actors, and the performance has to be truly undeniable in greatness to get a win - that’s how I feel about the matter personally. Obviously the scenario would be a bit different if he was still around, and I’m sure everyone would much rather he was still here to produce more work of this calibre - but every performance every year that goes for a nomination has its own narrative. I think he would still be contending.

Anonymous said...

Calvin: I think that if chadwick had not died they would have frauded him into supporting.

Luke Higham said...

Brilliant performance from a man who could've been a major star for years to come.

Louis: Your rating for Viola Davis.

Matt Mustin said...

Stunning performance.

Psifonian said...

My view is this: if he had not died, there would be a lot more competition for the win, but it's clear that none of the other nominees really want to promote themselves too much because they know that it would be in poor taste. Boseman's track record the season isn't like Ledger's was; Ledger was undeniable and cleaned up almost every single award, whereas Boseman has always had strong competition from Ahmed, Hopkins and the unnominated Lindo. Boseman certainly gets nominated, and he might very well win, but I think that if we were looking at the race through a prism where Boseman was still alive, I think we would be considering his chances undercut by the film underperforming at the Oscars in that timeline ("Ma Rainey" missing BP and Screenplay).

Anonymous said...

I dread the moment when chadwick wins and the entire internet goes "he only won because he died" not knowing he did an amazing performance. If he won for da 5 bloods i would understand but not ma rainey's.

Matt Mustin said...

I gotta say one thing real quick, this whole "are they just winning because they died" discussion happens all the time, and I always find it EXTREMELY distasteful. Let's just appreciate an amazing performance.

Calvin Law said...

Anonymous: Stay away from Gold Derby, that awful discourse has been going on for ages there (thankfully with some rightful pushback). This awards season has been filled with awful discourse, from Black/Asian nominees in the acting categories being 'token'/woke nominations to the love to female directors and screenwriters being pandering, and of course the stupid 'this was a bad year for film'/asterik year for the Oscars - but the Boseman discourse definitely stands out as some of the most vehement.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: Problem is they don't actively watch the films and decide whether or not they merit the nominations.

Calvin Law said...

Luke: They just sweep everything under one rug. It’s all very tiresome - all it takes is just a clip of Boseman’s performance to show to people that the awards attention is very deserved.

Luke Higham said...

Anyway, I'm looking forward to Hopkins tonight.

Luke Higham said...

Guys, once Louis has finished the bonus rounds and reviewed every 5, I might actually go back and reread them all from Dudley Manlove onwards.

Calvin Law said...

Will never cease to amuse me how that was the first ever performance reviewed on this blog.

BRAZINTERMA said...

Louis and folks: Say your TOP10 of the best performances farewell or last film.
PS: it is only worth mentioning actors who managed to complete the whole work. Examples: The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus does not enter due to the interruption of Ledger, and whoever is to quote Peter Finch is worth for Raid on Entebbe (1977) and not for Network (1976).

10º Clark Gable - The Misfits
9º John Cazale – The Deer Hunter
8º James Dean – Giant
7º John Wayne – The Shootist
6º Phillip Seymour Hoffman - A Most Wanted Man
5º Chadwick Boseman
4º Robert Ryan - The Iceman Cometh
3º Heath Ledger – The Dark Knight
2º Richard Farnsworth - The Straight Story
1º Harry Dean Stanton – Lucky

Mitchell Murray said...

On a random note, "Death Battle" released it's new episode today on Youtube: Shadow Vs Ryuko (Kill la Kill)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNo-wo6sPy4

They're follow up fight is going to be a textbook Marvel/DC match up: Lex Luthor Vs Doctor Doom

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous & Luke:

Domingo up to a 4. Davis down to a 3.5, watching it again, as much as I think she's fine in depicting her approach, her approach is all wrong. This as you even take her seducing scene, she's so serious there even. Although this is not a comedic performance, there should be hints of levity here, yet Davis treats every scene with the same degree of seriousness which is a mistake. Especially compare that to Boseman. Also I think frankly Turman and Domingo show additionally that they could, while still overshadowed to a degree, could live in the same space as what Boseman is doing, whereas Davis is an afterthought when they share the screen.

Tahmeed:

Minari has some strong low key editing to be sure. This in particularly in how it combines so often with the score, and so much of the work is realizing the connection between the two. This being beautifully done. Additionally any film like this, a certain rhythm is essential, which the film captures as beautifully in granting you a sense of normalcy, though never falling into dullness nor becoming too slick for the nature of the story. And of course, it just has strong drama editing in terms of getting the best within the scenes, as there is a natural cutting between characters that emphasizes the point of a given scene each time.

Anonymous:

I guess here are the most compelling and convincing married couples...not necessarily god marriages.

Adrien & Rocky - Rocky
Amy & Biff - The Strawberry Blonde
George & Mary - It's a Wonderful Life
Jacob & Monica - Minari
Johan & Marianne - Scenes from A Marriage
Karl & Kristina - The Emigrants & The New Land
Marge & Norm - Fargo
Nick & Nora - The Thin Man
The Old Man & Mrs. Parker - A Christmas Story
Sean & Mary Kate - The Quiet Man

Anonymous & Anonymous?:

I don't think they would've frauded him, since Boseman would've gotten the reviews no matter what. The fact is, for you get to recognized posthumously, you have to deliver, I actually think every case (except Ralph Richardson, who is the exception), shows you have to deliver above and beyond. Boseman, Ledger, Finch & Dean (X2), both had stellar career defining reviews. Compare that to say James Gandolfini, Alan Rickman, Pete Postlethewaite or even Ledger for Doctor Parnassus. They had good reviews, but that just wasn't enough (Side Note: I think Harry Dean Stanton could've gotten in with an actual campaign sadly Magnolia is a terrible distributor in the regard, I had to literally, yes as in me, ask Gold Derby to include Stanton in the possible actor predictions that year, that's how poor they got the word out.)

Now to answer your question, I think he would've been nominated but the win would be up in the air. I think Ahmed or Hopkins could've taken it, particularly given their films have done considerably better with nominations.

Luke:

Appreciate the dedication Luke, but please at least skip 72 lead, those reviews are painful to me.

Brazinterma:

Ask again in the results.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I appreciate your concern. I have read the 72 reviews a few times and doesn't bother me that much. Anyway it'll always remind me of your progression as a writer and I don't think you should be ashamed of it. If you want to fix them later on then I won't object.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Matt mentioned Cynthia erivo as an alternative to Viola Davis. Do you think she would have been good?

Anonymous said...

Louis, what are your thoughts on Gary Oldman in True Romance?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: You weren't enthusiastic about Massimo Troisi from what I recall.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

I'd say she's a little young at this point, but even with that, I think I would rather have seen her in the role.

Anonymous:

I'm quite sure I've covered him before.

Luke:

No shame, in fact I think how simple some of reviews were are funny to me in retrospect, that year though in particular really deserves an update, particularly for Olivier, Caine and Brando.

Troisi's a little different. I wasn't personally impressed by his work, but he wasn't someone who would've been seen as a last chance, because he was basically an unknown performer in the U.S. His nomination came more so as a side effect a push for the project as a whole, seen as this deeply personal project, to the point he supposedly gave off potentially life saving surgery to film it. It's a bit of a different situation from the rest, who were all nationally known actors in the U.S.A.

Anonymous said...

I have nothing against troisi or the postman but I do not understand why they nominated him over Morgan freeman.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

There was a major campaign for him, if you watch Siskel & Ebert they covered it on their Oscar nominations reaction video for 95.

Freeman really wasn't in contention, nor was Seven. Ian McKellen for Richard III was probably #6, as he got both Globe and BAFTA nominations.

Anonymous said...

Louis: There is a rumor that McKellen missed out by a single vote.

BRAZINTERMA said...

Louis: Ok, I will rewrite.

Matt Mustin said...

Anonymous: It's not really a rumour, it's just something someone put on IMDb.

Luke Higham said...

Aside from 2018, I'm so glad the academy have become less lazy in recent times.

Mitchell Murray said...

Louis: I'm sure someone here has mentioned this before, but do you think Queen Latifah could've been great as Ma Rainey?

Given everything that's been discussed about the character - I would certainly say yes.

Calvin Law said...

I’m probably the only one here who has Davis as a 4.5 lol I thought her approach was the right one, though I also 100% see where Louis is coming from.

Anonymous said...

Mitchell: Louis said in his original thoughts on ma Rainey's that he would have casted queen Latifah.

Mitchell Murray said...

Anonymous: Well...there you go.

Matt Mustin said...

I was trying to figure out what, exactly, didn't work for me about Davis's performance, and yes, that's it exactly, she is ultra serious through the whole thing.

Robert MacFarlane said...

You know, now I want to see her in a Dean Wormer-styled comedy role that uses that seriousness and innate gravitas for something truly ridiculous.

Michael McCarthy said...

Yeah, after reading this review I think I’ll have to bump Chadwick up to third in my ranking, what a fire cracker of a performance this was. Sorry again, Mads.

Michael McCarthy said...

Also speaking on who would’ve been a better fit for Ma Rainey, what about Yvette Nicole Brown? She’s not too much younger than Davis, she mostly known for comedies so her tale would likely have been lighter, AND she wouldn’t have had to lip-sync.

Anonymous said...

Micheal: I am now imagine Shirley doing ma rainey and i...don’t really see it.

Michael McCarthy said...

Well I’m not saying she should play her as Shirley. I’m sure she’s capable of other characters.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Nicole would have been EXCELLENT.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

That claim seems to be an antiquated bit of questionable Oscar trivia that used to be more frequently seen on the internet, another one I remember was that Albert Salmi turned down an Oscar nomination for The Brothers Karamazov or my favorite, that Anthony Quinn had like 3 minutes of screentime for Lust For Life (even though you could simply watch the film to know that was false). So I think all of them are pretty phony, though it is possible that McKellen was close.

Robert:

I'd love to see that honestly.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If Sweeney Todd (2007) was better overall as a film, who would you've chosen for the title character and your choice for 1980s/90s/10s/20s.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Apparently Joe Dante tried to make Sweeney Todd in the 80’s with Christopher Lee, but studios turned him down.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I mean a theoretical better adaptation could easily be made (no that I even think the version we got is bad), Burton just needed to be a bit less dour with the material, honestly I think probably would've been if he had made the film in the 80's or early 90's.

Anyways:

80's:

Tim Curry (which let me enter an alternate universe where this exists)

90's:

Kevin Kline

10's:

John C. Reilly

20's:

Chris Pine

Louis Morgan said...

Robert:

Would've also loved to have seen that, and I imagine Dante at least would've tried to bring the darkly comic humor that is present in the musical yet is mostly lost in Burton's adaptation.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I wonder if Dante was pissed he didn’t direct Little Shop, especially since Roger Corman was his personal mentor.

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: I'd rather see John C. Reilly as Pirelli actually.

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

Honestly I just want more tracks of Reilly singing, even theoretically. Also Todd wasn't designed as a punk rocker emo heartthrob as Depp played him, Reilly is actually closer in type to George Hearn and Len Cariou, two noted stage Todds.

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: No, I'm very aware of that, it's my favourite musical and I've seen multiple versions of it. Reilly would do a good job as Todd too, but he'd be SO MUCH FUN as Pirelli.

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

True to be sure.

Calvin Law said...

All your suggestions for Sweeney Todd make me think about how there’s a true masterpiece of a film adaptation waiting for it to happen. Also, I do rather like Michael’s suggestion of Yvette Nicole Brown.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: your thoughts on ‘Rain Song’ from Minari?

Emi Grant said...

A guy I know from college has referred to Boseman's performance as "an underserved Heath Ledger" when he won the Globe, which very much makes me lose my cool in every sense of the word.

It's incredible how Boseman carried this film from beginning to end. I'm very glad he has the win in the bag. I think this review alone guarantees Boseman to be a least on the Top 3 of Louis' overall ranking.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Love the rain song as it manages to blend the lyrics, evidently by Han Ye-ri, so naturally and powerfully with Mosseri's score, which I've previously praised but I'll do it again. This as the music is such elegance in the slow build of the disparate pieces in creating this unique yet so fitting and haunting blend of instrumentation. The lyrics, which I'll admit I don't understand, and Han's vocals though do take it to even greater heights in granting such potent emotions that so naturally amplify that music. The music that is this kind of perfect blend between a kind of somberness and a kind of hopefulness.

Aidan Pittman said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the tracks "Garden of Eden" and "Paul's Antiphony" from Minari's score?

Anonymous said...

Louis: What made you downgrade Sean Penn for Dead Man Walking? Only asking because your review of his work is very positive.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: new David Lynch series about to start filming soon apparently.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Garden of Eden has such a lovely melody, and the really the gradual nature of the tempo makes for such a unique piece. This fashioning a kind of wonderful combination of evoking classic kind of pastoral themes, but doing it in its own way.

Paul Antiphony, is I suppose befitting its character named with the jumbled seemingly almost random piano scales. This again though this combination with that and the more pleasant vocals crafts a distinct kind of beauty to the piece.

Anonymous:

Mainly on re-watch just a couple of his early moments of the news moments.

Calvin:

Put the coffee on.