Showing posts with label Nicol Williamson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nicol Williamson. Show all posts

Tuesday, 11 October 2022

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1981: Results


5. James Woods in Eyewitness - The most interesting part of his film as he manages to find some character in really what isn't much of a role. 

Best Scene: Confronting Daryll
4. David Warner in Time Bandits - Warner gives a wonderfully over the top turn that brings just the right heightened villainy to his film. 

Best Scene: "A Reasonable Man"
3. Dennis Hopper in Out of the Blue - Hopper gives a quietly disturbing turn where he slowly reveals the vile nature of his man. 

Best Scene: Deciding to rape his daughter.
2. Griffin Dunne in An American Werewolf in London - Dunne balances comedy and horror as his demonic messenger. 

Best Scene: Second visit.
1. Nicol Williamson in Excalibur - Good predictions Luke, 8000's, Tahmeed, Ytrewq and Mitchell. Williamson delivers a downright brilliant turn that both gives the material the absolute gravitas it needs, while also constantly subverting it with his wily turn. 

Best Scene: Tricking Morgana

Next Year: 2016 Lead

Saturday, 8 October 2022

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1981: Nicol Williamson in Excalibur

Nicol Williamson did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Merlin in Excalibur. 

Excalibur tells the Arthurian legend. 

The saving grace of the first half of the film, Nicol Williamson does what the film cannot, which is attempting to find some kind of balanced tone to make the material palatable. Williamson is a natural fit for the role of Merlin as he is an actor that exudes gravitas from every pour of his being. His voice, one of the greatest, yet sadly largely forgotten, in cinema commands attention with such ease. Although speaking of the voices one of the persistent flaws of the film is the poor sound design, which supposedly Boorman turned from stereo to mono, which perhaps is the cause of it, but it causes almost many to sound poorly dubbed, Nicol Williamson being the most major exception. Maybe Williamson just delivered his lines again with a greater thought to them, or maybe they were able to retain his audio, either way, it only adds to Williamson being the center of attention. Williamson himself adds to this through his performance that very carefully maneuvers the film's fantastical yet dark tone. Williamson in just the bluntest aspect does deliver on the very idea of the legend by being that powerful presence he is, that instantly commands the respect of Merlin as this figure of such a tremendous force. When his Merlin speaks with authority, that authority can only be seen as the truth due to Williamson's striking manner as a performer, and when he speaks you very much must listen, just as all men must listen to Merlin the sorcerer. 

Merlin the sorcerer of Arthurian legend of course isn't this simple mentor wizard archetype, he's of a more complicated sort, even taking very questionable actions in his strange quest to see the legend of Arthur pass. Williamson's performance in turn isn't so simple as just there to deliver the gravitas to these early moments, something he does, but rather he helps out the film greatly by taking a bit out of the film's aggressively dramatic tone. Williamson pulls off a fascinating trick which is that he both takes the material very seriously, yet also doesn't take it seriously at all. There is a cheekiness that Williamson brings to his performance that is a welcome relief through the film's overall insanity of the legend, which seems particularly important given the initial mechanizations of the film involve Merlin basically getting a King laid that will lead to the birth to the eventual King Arthur (Nigel Terry). Williamson realizes a remarkable method of being able to speak the words to create the spell to create this scenario with the utmost seriousness, however, at the same time, his eyes can denote this certain calculation about Merlin, a knowing quality within the character. Williamson's method makes it so it does grant the idea of Merlin's foresight into the knowledge of the future that he is in a way purposefully composing a destiny, while also just making Merlin seem beside it all in his own way as the entity who walks on a different mental plane. 

Essentially as the film runs its course in the first half, which I do think is a lot of noise for the most part, Williamson consistently is the one who clears it away with his portrayal of Merlin's very specific machinations, which includes as much as taking a mother's child in order to fulfill destiny. Williamson though carries himself with such a powerful stride that manages to craft a properly entertaining spirit out of the cunning sorcerer. His manner as the advisor to Arthur, and in a strange way Arthur's nefarious sister Morgana Le Fay (Helen Mirren), who is also a magic user, is that of many things. There is a bit of warmth he does bring to his interactions with Arthur, but there is also that sense of intelligence as Williamson delivers every thoughtful suggestion with the sense of a man who has seen the future. Williamson though naturally delivers comedy in that same idea like when it seems like Arthur is lusting like the old King, and Williamson's sudden and annoyed reaction is pitch-perfect hilarity as the sorcerer who has had enough of the lusts of man. Although speaking of lusts, Williamson's scenes with Mirren are so carefully realized as Williamson presents still this certain captivating command as he instructs her almost in this dismissive way, while also conveying this certain internalized intrigue in her just as Merlin claims he cannot be captured by lust. Williamson is always compelling while making these qualities of Merlin seem consistent within the singular being of Merlin. 

Although as destined at a certain point Merlin finds himself imprisoned, which was very concerning, thankfully the rest of the film comes together to a pretty triumphant film in the second half even without Williamson around to steer the ship. If the film had left Merlin at that moment that might've been enough to be a great performance, nonetheless the greatest scenes of Williamson's come in the final act as Merlin returns to help Arthur one last time. Williamson is genuinely amazing in the scene as Arthur hopes for Merlin to help because it illustrates the magnificent juxtaposition he so effortlessly pulls off. As we have Williamson open the moment with such potent sincerity and affectionate warmth as Merlin notes that Arthur's love brought him back as a dream. I love the look of pride on Williamson's face as he looks upon Arthur at this point as a proud father. But it is only Williamson perhaps who could go from such a tender delivery of "a dream to some" and then such ferocious intensity as he finishes "a nightmare to others". Williamson showing in just one magnificent line delivery, which contains such a dramatic yet effective shift from calm earnestness to tremendous grandeur, powerfully realizes the nature of this Merlin. His final scene of dispatching Morgan by getting her to speak a self-destructive spell is outstanding. Williamson chooses such a fascinating choice as he speaks in whispers, yet whispers that only Williamson could do as never have whispers captured more intensity. Williamson in this manages to speak in this almost seductive come hither to Morgana, convincingly so,  while at the same time his eyes speaking the truth of his real intent towards such hatred for the evil witch. Williamson is absolutely wonderful in crafting this killing blow as Merlin pesters her with compliments, destroying her with this mischievous praise. An altogether brilliant scene due to Williamson's masterful choices as a performer. Williamson though masters the material entirely within his great performance that always manages to maneuver in just the right way to realize a perfect hypocrisy by playing material wholly as truth, while also not exactly taking it all that seriously. 

Sunday, 25 September 2022

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1981

And the Nominees Were Not:

Griffin Dunne in An American Werewolf in London

David Warner in Time Bandits

Nicol Williamson in Excalibur

James Woods in Eyewitness

Dennis Hopper in Out of the Blue

Friday, 1 January 2021

Alternate Best Actor 1970: Results

5. James Fox in Performance - Fox gives an effective against type turn portraying the right intense viciousness of a gangster, while also hitting the right notes in the film's messy psychedelic conclusion.
 
Best Scene: Acts of violence.  
4. Richard Harris in The Molly Maguires - Harris gives a strong understated leading turn, portraying both the technique and guilt as an undercover policeman in a outlaw group of miners.

Best Scene: Jail cell. 
3. Peter Sellers in Hoffman - Sellers gives one of his most raw, and also effective portrayals of a man trying to hide from his desperation.
 
Best Scene: False confrontation. 
2. Jason Robards in The Ballad of Cable Hogue - Robards gives a wonderful funny and just lively turn as a idiosyncratic western sort.
 
Best Scene: Cable's goodbye. 
1. Nicol Williamson in The Reckoning - Good predictions Mitchell, Razor and Bryan. Williamson takes this fairly easily for me in giving such a powerful and captivating portrayal of a man defined by his heritage both in his vulnerabilities and his cruelties. 

Best Scene: Getting revenge.

Next: 1970 Supporting

Friday, 18 December 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1970: Nicol Williamson in The Reckoning

Nicol Williamson did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Michael Marler in The Reckoning. 

The Reckoning is a mostly effective character study, despite not everything exactly tying together, about an Irish/Englishman businessman dealing with the death of his father.
 
We return to Nicol Williamson, once again teamed with director Jack Gold, as an idiosyncratic figure, though a seemingly different type of man from his self-destructive soldier in The Bofors Gun. Here instead we have his Michael Marler, a successful businessman. We open the film though getting a glimpse of Michael in his relationship with his seemingly quite horrid wife. In this opening the one can already see the sheer command of self that Williamson has a performer that is pretty incredible all its own. This as we have each moment within his wife behavior that is equally disdainful and lusty towards Michael. Williamson's portrayal is brilliant, in presenting in a way both how Michael is complicit within the relationship but also how he isn't exactly interacting in what would deem a healthy one. This in her more immediate insult there is amazing moment in the twitch that Williamson realizes within his face just for a moment to convey how his wife's behavior does irk him. This all the same more verbally unleashing her disdain to match her own though wrapped within this strange lust. Williamson bringing to life an instance the intensity of the relationship. This as Williamson brings the viciousness of a lust based upon this certain hatred, as he lashes out in truth against her barbs towards him as an Irishman, while still prodding him sexually. Williamson's eyes capture a mania befitting the insanity of the relationship and showing the raw lust yet also painful nature of their tryst. 

Williamson artfully changes gears as we see him go off to work. Williamson providing a greater refinement within the man fitting of a proper Englishman living as a businessman. Although with a fantastic intensity within his work, something that Williamson is one of the very best at, as in his eyes there is a strict conviction even just as he drives to get to work on time. Williamson within the office is simply brilliant and absolutely magnetic in crafting the man who moves through organization less like an office worker, and more of a warrior. This as Williamson brings a cutthroat quality within every moment within this sequence. This as he notes every strategy or idea within the company Williamson doesn't just merely say to someone, he seems to almost weaponize the words each time. This with a powerful lack of hesitation or concern. His articulation of every mistake of his boss Williamson brings this certain relish of a kill as though he's a hunter. Williamson treating every moment as though it is a battle within which Michael will eat whatever other dog he needs to survive. Williamson being exceptionally compelling in making this manner though seem so natural to the state of the man. This state of an innate intensity granting the history of a man almost as a sense of the immediate background of coming from a place or at least idea that one must fight to survive. Williamson brings this idea in every moment in showing a man who has fought for his place and aims to keep it. 

Hearing from an injury of his Irish father though Michael must return home, and even as entering to see his sister and mother, it is of a different man. This as Williamson walks with a calmer step and there is a fare more purer kind joy in just his gentle greeting to his mother, than we had seen previously in Michael. This is followed by just an astonishing scene with Williamson as he sees his bedridden father, who has died in the meantime. Williamson brings such a tenderness in the greeting and a complete sense of the affection he feels for his father. In the moment of realizing his father has died Williamson's reaction is heartbreaking as he brings the tears slowly from his eyes, in realizing a man suddenly experiencing more vulnerable emotions that he's likely suppressed in his marriage and job. Williamson's work is simply stunning as he manages to create the moment with such honest of this sort of crafted naturalism within the emotion suddenly hitting the man as the tears begin to flow. Williamson is effectively quiet, in almost showing the boy who once lived within this realm, as we see him deal with his father's sudden death, and later hears of the cause of it from his father's realm, who reveals he was killed in a bar fight by a young hooligan. Williamson is fantastic by actually reducing his own intensity to moments of quiet contemplation of the news, filled with hatred for English police in the story, where Williamson reflects a more submissive and somber state of Michael. 

Without the film stating it right away, what we see of what defines Michael through Williamson's deft performance. This as his heritage as an Irishman, to his English hating father whom he loves. In that Williamson creates two sides to the man, even though both sides Williamson shows is defined by this single aspect that create both sides. This as we follow Michael at home, where he has a brief affair with an older woman (Rachel Roberts). This where we see the tenderness of the young son seemingly trying to connect with his past on a more nostalgic quality. This even as he speaks of his father mainly speaking of his hatred with the English Williamson delivers it with a sentimental quality, earning this as his expression of a man thinking back upon his father whom he loved. This relationship, albeit brief, is contrast to his married one, though with a similar lustful quality within it at times. This also is in stark contrast though when we see Michael return to his job once again in the meantime before his father's funeral, and before he is expected to wreck havoc on the man who caused his father's death. Williamson is again rather astonishing in this sequence, this as he shows still the Irishman's son, as the savage businessman, this as man who designed his life believing, as his father taught him, that he must fight for everything. Williamson is compelling within himself. This in his striking barrage as he takes down a corporate rival and seems to shrink the man just through his verbal edge. This followed by an even greater moment, this just his eyes filled with this pure understated glee for the "kill" as he watches the man further defeated within a meeting. Williamson playing it so perfectly by both being incisive in a moment, then blithe in the next, almost twisting the knife into the other man, as though the man defeat shouldn't take up too much of his time.

Williamson finds a natural complexity though in creating the man that is Michael really is a mess of loyalties, expectations, and circumstance. This as in a later moment Michael ponders on the idea of needing to beat down a man for his father's death. He does this with a very honest and quite normal disbelief and exasperation of the whole idea. This as he expresses a man somewhat aware of being caught within his own strange situation. We see later as we watch him at a dinner party hosted by his wife. Williamson brings this tension within himself as he interacts guest with an increasingly hostile attitude. Williamson playing as man almost trying to attack what they represent to him still, just in his cutting sophisticated way, at first. Eventually Michael recognizes his father by singing a tune, much like his father, and this just an amazing moment for Williamson. This as he sings with a sense of pride in his voice, a sadness in his eyes, but also an awkwardness in his manner in this tribute. This as Williamson in this moment shows the strange tribute that Michael is to his father, this as he is trying to recognize him, but also not quite knowing how to do it. This becoming all the more evident right afterwards with a guest call him Irish in a derogatory way, leading to a rather instinctual violent reaction from Michael. Michael once again being the man designed by his father, in his own very sloppy way. This state of the man though is perhaps best revealed when Michael goes about his "revenge" by finding the young man with the intention of beating him with a blunt instrument. When he gets the man cornered, who pleads for mercy, Williamson's reaction is amazing. This as for a moment all the sense of real empathy and hesitation for the strange action comes to him, albeit briefly before he returns to beat the man for his father's name essentially. Williamson delivers an outstanding performance, particularly since I think he makes better sense of the central idea more so than the film itself does. This in Williamson's portrait of Michael, he creates a captivating realizing of a man defined by his father. This though in finding such complexity that even in a loving relationship, hatred can conspire into a broken man. Williamson not only making sense of this difficult idea but doing so with such masterful precision and power.

Monday, 7 December 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1970

And the Nominees Were Not:

James Fox in Performance

Peter Sellers in Hoffman
 
Nicol Williamson in The Reckoning

Richard Harris in The Molly Maguires

Jason Robards in The Ballad of Cable Hogue
 
And a review of:
Alec Guinness in Cromwell

Saturday, 7 March 2020

Best Actor Backlog Vol. 1: Results

5. John Hurt in 1984 - Hurt gives a devastating of a portrait of a man slowly finding humanity only to have it immediately and violently expunged from his soul.

Best Scene: "I love you"
4. Sean Connery in The Offence - Connery plays into yet also against type in creating a brutal and powerful portrait of a man unraveling within his mental trauma from his work as a detective of the worst crimes.

Best Scene: What really happened.
3. Claude Laydu in Diary of a Country Priest - Laydu gives a moving portrait of a man curious descent as he becomes confounded by his duties intertwined within personal doubts.

Best Scene: Personal Confession.
2. Al Pacino in Scarecrow - Pacino gives one of his best performances in his expressive, endearing but also very moving portrayal of a man who tries to get through his tough life by bringing joy to others.

Best Scene: "Baptism"
1. Nicol Williamson in The Bofors Gun - Honestly watching this performance again, this work deserves far more recognition in general, as it is one of the most captivating and searing portrayals of a self-destructive man that I've seen.

Best Scene: Asking for an answer.
Next: Still 43 lead/supporting, which judging by what I've seen so far, will not be a lineup, not that they're bad performances, just haven't found anything *too* remarkable yet.

Tuesday, 18 February 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1968: Nicol Williamson in The Bofors Gun

Nicol Williamson did not receive Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a BAFTA, for portraying Gunner Daniel O'Rourke in The Bofors Gun.

The Bofors Gun follows a long night of watching a defunct gun and the power struggle that develops between a NCO and an insubordinate soldier.

Nicol Williamson is a fascinating actor to explore into his specific career which was one of perhaps a slow downfall. This as he fell towards a certain obscurity, even within his passing, despite the acclaim during his early career. This was not example of an actor wasting his talent, but one torn down by his own ego and vices. Looking into his life suggests two things, one that there ought to be a film about Williamson (even if in a perhaps everything except name fashion), and the strange similarities between himself and his character of Gunner O'Rourke within this film. One being rather superficial as Williamson himself took the rank of Gunner in his time in the armed forces, but more so in this figure that is O'Rourke, who may share a similar, albeit far more extreme, case of self-destructive tendencies. Now Williamson here is actually secondary lead to David Warner as the milquetoast Lance Bombardier Terry "Lance Bar" Evans, whose been recently promoted, and is given the strange duty of leading the men to "protect" the defunct gun. The problem is Terry is more interested in getting home to England by trying to avoid any trouble in the night, but for that there is one major thorn in his side. The thorn in his side being Williamson's O'Rourke who comes into the film, marching towards the duty, with a mocking walk, along with an outrageous cry as he takes his place along the line, Williamson setting up instantly that O'Rourke is likely to be a problem.

Williamson is brilliant from his first disagreement as he asks the purpose of their duty to guard the useless gun, from the non-existent enemy. Williamson asking the question with an intensity illustrating a false sincerity in questioning the need. There is in that already a sense of something else in Williamson's performance, something unnerving that goes beyond simply being cynical about his strange duties as a soldier. The following scene though is that of the greatness of Williamson, and in that perhaps something so unfortunate about his own career as an actor. This is in the following scene where he bullies another soldier into changing beds, without permission from Terry, nor protest. Williamson is this force of personality with such ease. He captures the moment with such a powerful force of space, of a man who in this reveals so effectively O'Rourke. This as a man of this fierce personality, however he uses it in a way only seemingly to tear down his environment for the sake of the action. Williamson, mind you, controls that environment with such effortless power, however with such limited purpose. Williamson showing a man who much succeeds in being larger than life, a quality potentially useful in a soldier, however with little purpose in this. As the men begin to mock Terry, to which he says little, Williamson brings the most pronounced insults as he mocks the bombardier. This with the most natural venom, and Williamson using those eyes of his to make even a mockery some severe act of a violent in a way, through how piercing they are alone.

It is rather fascinating just how striking Williamson can be in a scene even when laying on his back, just adding a few words of derision, as the men discuss Terry's position. Williamson's voice used to such potent purpose, as he makes O'Rourke's verbal attacks brutal, even in seemingly the most casual asides. Of course O'Rourke does go beyond even deriding Terry, as he attacks another of his disobedient soldiers for his sexual fixations, where Williamson brings this callous dominance seemingly of the proper soldier, however used without any sense of one. When it seems in this moment of mutual insult, Terry himself throws one casually O'Rourke's way. What follows is a truly astonishing bit of acting from Williamson, in his eyes shift from a casual disregard to a vile hate, as his eyes become that of killer all just within Williamson's work. Williamson is genuinely terrifying as this shift is so naturally realized as he appears to aim himself towards Terry. What follows though is an act of violence, not towards Terry, but rather towards himself as he grabs a hot coal for several seconds before declaring his disdain for all. Williamson is amazing in as he captures the violence of one man for another, externalized in the sharpness of his delivery, but internalized in his eyes that seem to indicate towards some deeper chaos within the man. O'Rourke retiring in the moment, in a way that Williamson suggestst as his only option, that seemingly would've otherwise resulted in his own breakdown or the violent end for Terry.

O'Rourke I'd say honestly is a role most actors would struggle with, not only because the part requires as striking of a presence as Williamson, but it would be so easy to make the actions of the man just random moments for the sake of performance. That is never even remotely the case for Williamson's work which crafts a logic in this seeming illogical man. This is as Williamson's performance captures this specific nature of the man vividly. This as any action comes from the same core that is the man.This is as even early on when he sings a jovial song, or seemingly jokes, there is even that this intensity Williamson brings to it. The attempt at something jovial seems real enough however Williamson's portrayal of it is this though still as some anguished act all the same. Williamson making O'Rourke's unwieldy state as a natural state of nature for where the man is. There is a moment where O'Rourke questions Terry's authority directly while also telling him he should essentially preemptively have him locked up. Williamson delivers the derision with the incisiveness in his words and his disregard in his eyes, however when speaking of the suggestion, there is nothing mocking in it. There is almost a cry for help in Williamson's portrayal that has this derangement within it, yet a sense of clarity as he makes the suggestion for Terry to not let him go be free into the night. Williamson in these two acts is able to reveal the man who is a particular dangerous combination as he most willing wishes to disobey, yet is as keenly aware of the problem of this.

The reason for this is briefly reflected in a moment where O'Rourke notes that the night will mark his birthday, as well as his time of turning to the age of 30. Williamson is simply incredible in the moment as his eyes capture a man truly looking into a nihilistic void as the man remarks how he'd never wish to turn 30. Williamson delivering this as a fundamental philosophy of a man, who as hostile as he is, Williamson alludes to within this a horrible depression.The rest of the night essentially becomes this prolonged suicide, that Williamson realizes with a terrible vividness. This as he does not portray it as exact, anything but as the man is both quite assured in his "mission" while not at all assured in the exact method. O'Rourke delivers this potent id within the man, that portrays a destructive style that means to destroy all in his path, himself included. Williamson delivers this emotional wretchedness of the man as he speaks of killing within the army, yet seems to be looking towards only an emptiness. His random destructive actions become of near animalistic violence. Not quite though as Williamson quite simply is outstanding in these scenes as it is not a singular emotion of violence, that is there, along with these moments of temporary joy, those that only delay a profound decay that Williamson returns to as O'Rourke basic expression. All other actions being these temporary delays towards his inevitable fate he has declared for himself. That depression that is brutally, yet powerfully depicted within Williamson's performance. This as he does not make this momentary lapse, but this seething quality of a man who has long determined himself, or at least his existence, to be useless. Williamson is amazing as the way he manages to show even a descent within this idea as the man becomes messier and drunker throughout the night. Williamson delivering the only respites towards O'Rourke's own depression, being his hate towards others.

Williamson creating this searing since of self-destruction as this crutch of anger towards others that he holds onto, as that intense emotion is the only relief from his own self-hatred. What oddly becomes the most off-putting moments are when O'Rourke attempts to return to joke, that become these unnerving asides in Williamson's portrayal, as the man willing almost to say anything given he intends to leave the world quite shortly. When Terry threatens to turn him in, Williamson delivers O'Rourke's lack of concern towards the consequences, as wholly earnest, as a man content to waste away. The final minutes of the film are this extreme that Williamson makes so vivid as he creates the mania of O'Rourke. This as he threatens Terry himself it is with a maniacal loathing in his eyes towards Terry, but just as much towards himself. Williamson brings a hostility to every one of O'Rourke's words to Terry, who attempts to talk sanity into him. Williamson speaks each word with a painful combination of treating the world as an abomination but doing himself with the same treatment. Williamson delivering this sincere outrage towards Terry's selfishness for his fixation on his promotion however he does not make it as this arbiter of justice, but rather a man clawing at anything he can find as he intends to lose it all. As he pushes Terry to name why he is suicidal as a game, I love how Williamson, as much as he is so despairing towards Terry's opinion, there is this as powerful desperation as though there is a glint of need that Terry would really be able to give O'Rourke a semblance of an answer for his own self-destruction. The final few seconds of Williamson work shows the sheer brilliance of his performance. This as he does not turn O'Rourke into a device to challenge Terry, but rather shows that this is very much O'Rourke own personal journey to the end. This as hateful as the man is, the humanity in his own suicide is kept ever prevalent in Williamson's performance. This as we see as he is about to stab himself, there is that vile hate again in his voice, yet in his eyes we see the profound sorrow in the man accepting destruction, not with ease, but with the suffering one would expect. This is a brilliant performance by Williamson as he manages to give one of the most captivating portraits of self-destruction committed to film, as he never makes this simple act, but a complex irrational feast of decay within the man's mind. 

Monday, 10 February 2020

Best Actor Backlog Volume 1

And the overlooked performances are:

Nicol Williamson in The Bofors Gun

John Hurt in 1984

Claude Laydu in Diary of a Country Priest

Al Pacino in Scarecrow

Sean Connery in The Offence

Sunday, 21 October 2018

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1975: Results

5. Ugo Tognazzi in My Friends - Tognazzi gives a wonderful endearing turn that creates the right dynamic with the titular friends while also creating a undercurrent of pathos within the man.

Best Scene: Death bed of a friend.
4. Bruce Dern in Smile - Dern gives a hilarious yet also somehow moving portrayal of a man who has devised his own form of the American dream that he uses to live life by.

Best Scene: Talking to his friend in prison.
3. Alan Bates in In Celebration - Bates, along with all his co-stars, gives a terrific turn portraying so effectively the desperation in his portrait of a son struggling to find a way to reveal his discontent with his life and family at a reunion.

Best Scene: Can't sleep.
2. Nicol Williamson in The Wilby Conspiracy - Williamson steals his film wholesale through his dynamic and domineering portrayal of a cunning villainy fighting passionately for what he believes in.

Best Scene: Revealing the conspiracy.
1. Richard Dreyfuss in Jaws - Dreyfuss, as with his two main co-stars, gives a great performance that compliments them wonderfully through his off-beat energy while also effectively realizing his own place within the dramatic elements of the film.

Best Scene: Indianapolis reaction.
Updated Overall

Next Year: 1987 lead

Saturday, 6 October 2018

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1975: Nicol Williamson in The Wilby Conspiracy

Nicol Williamson did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Major Horn in The Wilby Conspiracy.

The Wilby Conspiracy I guess you could say is a bit of a prototype for the Edward Zwick style message picture, where it takes populist style approach towards a rather serious minded subject matter. In this case it focuses on the then very real apartheid in South Africa, though through a spy/diamond hunting actioner featuring a South African Freedom Fighter (Sidney Poitier), and an English Engineer (Michael Caine) as the unlikely pair on the run together.

One of the benefits of my little endeavor here is to discover remarkable performers who have flown under the radar of a more generalized view of cinema. One such discovery is Nicol Williamson who though I had always thought was compelling as the mentor wizard in Spawn of all things, most of his work had been unseen by me. Well as I discover more of his work it is clear that besides having one of the most underrated voices of cinema, he is an especially dynamic performer. The Wilby Conspiracy, though pretty disposable overall, though does give an outlet for Williamson's talent in the form of Major Horn an operator in South African Bureau of State Security. The villain who will be chasing our fugitive heroes for the duration of the film. Not much in this really stands out past acceptable enough, with the exception of Major Horn due to Williamson. The sheer power of his presence alone makes an impact as we first meet him casually smoking in the office of superior. Williamson quickly steals the scene, and really the film, in just his perfect timing in his brush off of wishing as he could quit smoking as he dismisses his superior. Williamson simply has the force overpower in his precise yet also rather witty delivery that makes the Major instantly compelling.

Although it might be easy enough to just make the Major a devil in the flesh, given his intentions throughout the film, Williamson takes an alternate approach. He doesn't seek to grant sympathy for  the character, but what he does do is create a clear motivation within Horn. Williamson is amazing in the moment where he so sufficiently describes Horn's position which isn't as a drooling racist, but rather a man trying to lay claim to a land through his view of history, though with a strict racism within that idea. Williamson brings such conviction and strict passion in the moment showing such a forcefulness in the man's words. His delivery is particularly notable as he has it controlled the entire time, as a powerful man would, though has this fantastic way of realizing this certain pride combined with a fear mongering hate wrapped within as he speaks of his view of the fate of Afrikaners if he does not perform his perceived duty. Theoretically this could have been just a minor scene that gives us the villain, yet Williamson brings such substance to the words through his performance that both establishes the villain, but also establishes his danger by so honestly revealing the man's firm beliefs that will compel him throughout the narrative.

Williamson will give us what will be the hunter for the film as he begins to trail the two men. It is always fascinating to see performer so rise above his material, not that this is a terrible film, but Williamson makes merely scenes of exposition of things we technically already know for the most part the best scenes in the film. This again is within how strong his presence is, and how properly idiosyncratic of a performer. Williamson is brilliant as he brings attention to himself without ever for a moment seem like he's showing off. He does it with such ease as he holds such sway on screen to the point that there is something immensely fascinating about just the way he holds his cigarette. Williamson's striking ability as a performer cuts through every scene making every little threat from Horn carry such a remarkable menace. What's incredible though is that Williamson is so good, he even in way grants the character one liners just through his dynamite delivery of every one of his lines. A common line is given such gravitas, and good one given such impeccable timing that allows Williamson to become this oppressive yet charismatic force who terrorizes and interrogates with a cheerful smile.

Williamson is great as he realizes the man's technique as he switches from a false amiability with charm to a violent intensity on a dime's notice creating such a dangerous man through this. Williamson finds this confidence within the technique that makes Horn particularly imposing as again he makes every switch of intention so natural as he weaponizes his personality at every point of following the two men and their conspiracy they slowly unravel involving black revolutionaries, smuggling Indian dentists, and diamonds. Of course the man who unravels it all isn't one of our two heroes, but rather the villainous Major Horn, which is a good thing since Williamson is on call for the exposition. Williamson is amazing in the scene bringing such smug satisfaction as he mocks all of his victims, and brings such a distinct slimy joy in every venomous word as he notes how they all played right into his game. It is rather astonishing as Williamson even owns the scene when the tide turns against Major Horn. Williamson just is another level as even when Michael Caine is explaining why Horn should surrender rather than kill a rebel leader, Williamson takes the moment for himself as his reaction of Horn calculating his odds and taking in the information makes more of an impact than the information itself. This is the type of performance I love occasionally coming across as Williamson by the sheer will of his own work creates a great villain, in what is not a great film. It is a fantastic turn from an actor I look forward to uncovering more of.

Monday, 24 September 2018

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1975

And the Nominees Were Not:

Alan Bates in In Celebration

Brian Cox in In Celebration

Bill Owen in In Celebration

Bruce Dern in Smile

Richard Dreyfuss in Jaws

Nicol Williamson in The Wilby Conspiracy

Ugo Tognazzi in My Friends

For Prediction Purposes:

Bates in In Celebration