Nicol Williamson did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Major Horn in The Wilby Conspiracy.
The Wilby Conspiracy I guess you could say is a bit of a prototype for the Edward Zwick style message picture, where it takes populist style approach towards a rather serious minded subject matter. In this case it focuses on the then very real apartheid in South Africa, though through a spy/diamond hunting actioner featuring a South African Freedom Fighter (Sidney Poitier), and an English Engineer (Michael Caine) as the unlikely pair on the run together.
One of the benefits of my little endeavor here is to discover remarkable performers who have flown under the radar of a more generalized view of cinema. One such discovery is Nicol Williamson who though I had always thought was compelling as the mentor wizard in Spawn of all things, most of his work had been unseen by me. Well as I discover more of his work it is clear that besides having one of the most underrated voices of cinema, he is an especially dynamic performer. The Wilby Conspiracy, though pretty disposable overall, though does give an outlet for Williamson's talent in the form of Major Horn an operator in South African Bureau of State Security. The villain who will be chasing our fugitive heroes for the duration of the film. Not much in this really stands out past acceptable enough, with the exception of Major Horn due to Williamson. The sheer power of his presence alone makes an impact as we first meet him casually smoking in the office of superior. Williamson quickly steals the scene, and really the film, in just his perfect timing in his brush off of wishing as he could quit smoking as he dismisses his superior. Williamson simply has the force overpower in his precise yet also rather witty delivery that makes the Major instantly compelling.
Although it might be easy enough to just make the Major a devil in the flesh, given his intentions throughout the film, Williamson takes an alternate approach. He doesn't seek to grant sympathy for the character, but what he does do is create a clear motivation within Horn. Williamson is amazing in the moment where he so sufficiently describes Horn's position which isn't as a drooling racist, but rather a man trying to lay claim to a land through his view of history, though with a strict racism within that idea. Williamson brings such conviction and strict passion in the moment showing such a forcefulness in the man's words. His delivery is particularly notable as he has it controlled the entire time, as a powerful man would, though has this fantastic way of realizing this certain pride combined with a fear mongering hate wrapped within as he speaks of his view of the fate of Afrikaners if he does not perform his perceived duty. Theoretically this could have been just a minor scene that gives us the villain, yet Williamson brings such substance to the words through his performance that both establishes the villain, but also establishes his danger by so honestly revealing the man's firm beliefs that will compel him throughout the narrative.
Williamson will give us what will be the hunter for the film as he begins to trail the two men. It is always fascinating to see performer so rise above his material, not that this is a terrible film, but Williamson makes merely scenes of exposition of things we technically already know for the most part the best scenes in the film. This again is within how strong his presence is, and how properly idiosyncratic of a performer. Williamson is brilliant as he brings attention to himself without ever for a moment seem like he's showing off. He does it with such ease as he holds such sway on screen to the point that there is something immensely fascinating about just the way he holds his cigarette. Williamson's striking ability as a performer cuts through every scene making every little threat from Horn carry such a remarkable menace. What's incredible though is that Williamson is so good, he even in way grants the character one liners just through his dynamite delivery of every one of his lines. A common line is given such gravitas, and good one given such impeccable timing that allows Williamson to become this oppressive yet charismatic force who terrorizes and interrogates with a cheerful smile.
Williamson is great as he realizes the man's technique as he switches from a false amiability with charm to a violent intensity on a dime's notice creating such a dangerous man through this. Williamson finds this confidence within the technique that makes Horn particularly imposing as again he makes every switch of intention so natural as he weaponizes his personality at every point of following the two men and their conspiracy they slowly unravel involving black revolutionaries, smuggling Indian dentists, and diamonds. Of course the man who unravels it all isn't one of our two heroes, but rather the villainous Major Horn, which is a good thing since Williamson is on call for the exposition. Williamson is amazing in the scene bringing such smug satisfaction as he mocks all of his victims, and brings such a distinct slimy joy in every venomous word as he notes how they all played right into his game. It is rather astonishing as Williamson even owns the scene when the tide turns against Major Horn. Williamson just is another level as even when Michael Caine is explaining why Horn should surrender rather than kill a rebel leader, Williamson takes the moment for himself as his reaction of Horn calculating his odds and taking in the information makes more of an impact than the information itself. This is the type of performance I love occasionally coming across as Williamson by the sheer will of his own work creates a great villain, in what is not a great film. It is a fantastic turn from an actor I look forward to uncovering more of.
119 comments:
His work in Excalibur has been talked about quite a lot on this blog as being one of the great hidden gems, and since he was good in Balors Gun, I imagine he will appear again at some point.
Louis: Speaking of the 80s, what do you reckon to this potential performance? you spoke about this film in a review briefly quite a while ago (building suspense here), I am actually curious since there was a lot of set problems with this film, yet every mention of the film it seems praises this performance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnvbtAoucPU
Louis: One more thing, before I go to bed lol, what are your thoughts on Diana Rigg in her only major film nominated performance in The Hospital? (I am in a Rigg mood lol just watched an Avengers episode as well)
Louis: Your present film roles for Alec Guinness?
And are you looking forward to the Top Gun sequel? I like to think of it as Tom Cruise delivering his own The Color of Money, since he'll be around the same age Newman was (61) when the movie comes out (58) and he'll be reprising a character. I do hope that this sequel is better than that one.
Louis: Your thoughts on the screenplay and cinematography of Road to Perdition and A History of Violence.
Louis: your top 20 oliver reed acting moments
Louis: your thoughts on the screenplay, cinematography, score and direction of the green mile and the shawshank redemption
I saw A Star is Born and really dug the hell out of it. Granted, I might be attaching myself to it because of he horrible stuff in the news earlier today that I emphatically don’t want to talk about, but I was very moved. Gaga definitely deserves it over Close, this shouldn’t even be a contest. Cooper would be a worthy Actor winner.
Is Williamson’s rating for The Bofors Gun final?
Robert: What did you think of Sam Elliott.
The Reckoning is a great leading role performance by Williamson.
Houndtang: I've heard he's really amazing in that film and that's probably where he's gonna get his five, though I personally would love it if he got one for Excalibur.
Louis: How close was Williamson to a five because the review as written is more of a 5 than a 4.5.
Robert: What bad news? I dont want to assume, unless it is this.
RIP Scott Wilson
RIP Scott Wilson
Daniel: As sad as that is, what Robert is referring to is the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh as a U.S. Supreme Court Justice. Which is disastrous not only because Kavanaugh himself is a horrible garbage person, but also because it creates a clear conservative majority in the Supreme Court that could likely last for decades and potentially set our country back by centuries.
Michael: Ahh I see.
Or haha maybe those allegations were false and politically motivated?
I'd suggest we avoid opening this can of worms any further if we can.
Anonymous: Oh fuck off.
I guess not.
Will get to the other thoughts soon.
Saw A Star is Born, actually liked it a great deal, though I do have a few minor reservations regarding some of the editing, and I wish there had been more scenes between the brothers early on, since I quite liked the idea of that addition.
RIP Scott Wilson
Can we please not talk about politics or at least not try to piss each other off.
My Supporting overall prediction.
1. Shaw
2. Cazale
3. Von Sydow
4. Dreyfuss
5. Meredith
6. Burns
7. Williamson
8. Dourif
9. Bates
10. Owen
11. Durning
12. Cox
13. Tognazzi
14. Sarandon
15. Dern
Louis: Your rating and thoughts on Lady Gaga.
Louis: And yes, I too wish we got more of Sam Elliott as he was great with what he had.
Speaking of Elliott, my sister gave birth to a son yesterday named Elliot.
Congrats to your sister Luke!
Louis: thoughts on the rest of the cast you’re not saving (i.e. Chappelle, Ramos, Clay, Gavron).
Calvin: Thank You. :)
Louis: I'm not sure If you're gonna give thoughts on these until Cooper's review, but your thoughts on 'Shallow' (I love that song) and 'I'll Never Love Again'.
And what did you think of Cooper's direction.
I saw A Star is Born as well. Lady Gaga is certainly quite good although i was really disappointed because i thought Elliot would have more to do.
Luke:
Gaga - 4.5(Her musical performance scenes are all outstanding both in terms of the technical aspect, but more importantly (when examining an acting turn) she delivers the right emotions that reflect the state of her character in certain numbers. "Shallow" and "I'll Never Love Again" are particularly remarkable in that regard the first in terms of Ally finding her confidence within the song, and the final in showing the weight of the finale. She's also very good in terms of striking up a chemistry with Cooper particularly in the early scenes of their relationship. Their best moments I'd say are the early playfulness which are just delightful. Now I did think there are a few iffy moments. An early scene with Clay, she goes a little too big I think as she seems to want to be literally Cher from Moonstruck as the Italian American daughter. Also there is the occasional moment, usually brief though, where her reactions don't quite capture a scene fully, and sometimes her work perhaps defers too much to Cooper to carry some moments. Again these brief though, and never add up to anything truly problematic especially given when she's at her best, she's great. For the most part she does deliver in the dramatic moments as well, though usually best when the "actor" rather than the reactor. Again these are only minor faults as this is a terrific proper star turn overall.)
Let me hold off on the songs, though I'll say both will be deserving nominees and potential winners.
Cooper's direction overall is remarkable directorial debut, not say Welles or Laughton good, but definitely good. Now he does fall a little bit into a common feature of an actor turned director debut which is tryingtoohardtoimpressionism. Although this is a much better trait to have than to be a workman, so I don't mind too much. Plus it actually isn't too overt (unlike say something like Drive, He Said) and there is only the occasional moment where there's a shot choice, or an editing choice that feels showy for the sake of it. Again I also do wish he focused upon the brothers more, as I have a feeling that was probably editing rather than script. For the most part it is assured work, especially his handling of the musical scenes which are fantastic on a directorial front. In those moments he brings out such a vibrancy in the visuals that compliment the music beautifully. There are moments where there is that bit of over editing, but he also does find the right times to sort of let the camera sit allowing the performances to naturally develop within the scene. And I will even though there is occasional an ambitious choice that doesn't work, I love some of the minor choices like just the moment of leaving a pivotal reaction from Sam Elliott as he's trying to back up his truck up. Although there are imperfections, Cooper definitely shows a definite talent behind the camera.
Calvin:
Chappelle - 3.5(I wish there had been more of him as he brings a wonderful warmth in his few minutes of screentime, and has a dynamic presence onscreen. It is a nice wholly earnest bit of work from him.)
Clay - 3.5(The same goes for another edgy comedian, and it is almost a little comical that Clay plays such a warm hearted character. Clay brings it out in such low key genuine way though. I also really like his one moment out of that where he shows the frustration in the way that connects it directly as concern for his daughter.)
Ramos - (Well he's certainly in the film. I didn't find he made much of an impact one way or the other. Not bad, just not particularly notable.)
Gavron - 2(He's pretty bland and is a little too cliched in an already cliched role as the "britush music manager". I mean as such he's no Alan Bates in the Rose, well really he's much less, as he's just really a bit of a caricature. I'll admit the writing does him no favors in particular, but he doesn't add anything to his thin role either.)
I’m ashamed to admit my immediate reaction to Ramos was to assume he’d start singing some Hamilton verses.
Luke: Congratulations to your sister! :)
Tahmeed: Thank You. :)
Luke: Congratulations to your sister!
Anonymous: Thanks. :)
Luke: Congrats =D
RatedRStar: Thanks.
:)
Louis: Your thoughts on this scene from Spider Man 2.
https://youtu.be/yRhRZB-nqOU
Tahmeed: I'm pretty sure he has given his thoughts on that scene before.
Tahmeed: The train sequence in Spider-Man two is just a stellar action set piece playing to Raimi's strength as a kinetic director. It really what should have been probably the climax of the film since it builds its intensity so well throughout and is one of those scenes that just feels what a superhero film is all about. As it gives us the hero in a demanding, and visually engaging sequence, while also playing with the idea of the the actual hero who saves people while fighting the villain. My only negative would be the extras and featured extras really ham it up a bit too much.
(For some reason my account isn’t working)
Louis: thoughts on the finale of Better Call Saul? The Mike stuff was strong (Banks’ best work in quite some time), Lalo stuff was pretty fun though I would’ve preferred maybe a bit more Nacho (Mando was great this season whenever he had the chance), and the opening flashback was terrific, however the best part was definitely how it toyed with our feelings with Jimmy’s ‘redemption’ and Odenkirk was simply amazing.
Louis: Thoughts on the 'Is he smart?' scene from Forrest Gump. That scene alone bumps Hanks up to a 4 for me.
Louis: Your thoughts on the cinematography for each of the Lord Of The Rings & Harry Potter films.
Saw Venom, I have to admit although this is easily the weakest superhero film this year, I did get some entertainment value despite the lack of development between Hardy and Williams (pre-transformation), no interesting supporting characters, mediocre script and an inconsistent tone. If not for the box-office numbers, I would've been worried for Hardy. A sequel's definitely gonna happen though Sony better get rid of Fleischer and make good use of Harrelson.
Hardy - 3/3.5
Williams - 2 (She's completely misused here)
Ahmed - 2.5 (Same as Williams though he does have a few okay moments)
Luke: Your thoughts on Hardy?
And I finally watched Justice League, prior to Aquaman's release. I enjoyed Gadot and especially Miller but I pray Aquaman is way better than this and poor Cavill with his unseen moustache.
Bryan: I don't think everyone is gonna take to him, could perhaps be alone on this one, but I enjoyed what he did, despite not being able to develop any real chemistry with Williams and having to deliver some god-awful lines.
And please make the sequel Rated-R.
Luke: Hardy's the only reason I'm planning on (eventually) watching the movie now, and I did read that he was the main (only?) highlight of the film in several reviews. Thanks!
Well I'm going to be disgruntled for a bit as half of my detailed responses got deleted on me. But I will get to them, but thought I'd get to a few shorter ones first.
RatedRStar:
Well he is already set for one of his villain turns from the 80's, but I could see reviewing him for that as well.
Rigg's performance is quite good actually given that the role is a touch to much of a screenwriters invention. In that the creation of the character seems a little too obvious. Rigg though manages to bring enough vivacious style along with enough nuance honestly within her performance to make up for a bit of the contrivances. This mostly in being so lustful, but with an actual honesty within her interactions with Scott.
Bryan:
Vyacheslav Molotov
Professor X
Mr. Holmes
I do have a certain interest in Top Gun II, though I'd actually wager it would have to be reversal of Hustler/The Color of Money, where the sequel is the more mature effort. As to try to bring the same eighties cheesiness would probably be a mistake, especially since Cruise has grown a great deal as an actor since that performance, though Maverick is certainly an iconic role for him.
Michael:
No, in fact I greatly regret having come across his performance after having already done 68 lead.
Calvin:
Would have liked more closure with Nacho for the season. Everything was terrific though nonetheless with Mike being pushed to really his Breaking Bad limit, and the whole sudden intensity within that story. Loved the final straw though in Jimmy's transition in every bit of the episode particularly his final moment where he seemed to go finally full Saul. Also felt the use of McKean was far more effective here than the last flashback where he was kind of wasted. Great finale to be sure.
Louis: Could you possibly review Williamson in The Bofors Gun after the bonus rounds are complete.
Louis: your top 10 michael mando acting moments
Louis: Your cast ranking for It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.
Everyone: Thoughts on the new Pet Sematary trailer?
I would go:
1. Glenn Howerton
2. Charlie Day
3. Kaitlin Olson (though she's definitely more consistent)
4. Danny DeVito
5. Rob McElhenney
All great in their own ways.
And for the guest stars:
1. Andrew Friedman
2. Gregory Scott Cummins
3. Jimmi Simpson
4. Lynne Marie Stewart
5. Catherine Reitman
6. Sandy Martin
7. David Hornsby
8. Roddy Piper
9. Artemis Pebdani
10. Shelly Desai
11. Lance Barber
12. Dave Foley
13. Brian Unger
14. Chad Coleman
15. Alanna Ubach
16. Mary Lynn Rajskub
17. Travis Schuldt
18. Judy Greer
19. Sean William Scott
20. Nate Mooney
21. Mary Elizabeth Ellis
22. Kyle Davis
23. Stephen Collins
24. Jason Sudeikis
Luke: I feel like no one would mind just seeing a spontaneous review of Williamson in The Bofors Gun before then if Louis wanted to. Maybe in the lull before the Oscars.
Michael: I'd be happy enough to have it probably after the oscars because we will end up recommending stuff beforehand and I really want Louis to review Sean Connery in The Offence. Who knows, he could do a special lineup with Connery, Dano, Williamson, Claude Laydu in Diary Of A Country Priest (The comparisons to Winter Light and First Reformed, as well as being named as one of the greatest performances of all-time have me intrigued) and one other.
Michael: Actually, that 5th slot should go to Toshiro Mifune in The Bad Sleep Well. Louis did say he could go up on a re-watch.
Louis: your top 20 oliver reed acting moments
Louis: Seen any other new releases lately.
Louis: Your top 10 musicals movies
I would like to see Louis review some highly rated performances he didn't get to the first few times around. Williamson & Mifune for example & whoever else he missed who could get a 5.
Anonymous: Hey, ask him those questions for another time, alright? Give him some room to write the other answers to the other people's answers.
*questions
Louis: Looking back at all the years you've done so far, Claude Laydu in Diary Of A Country Priest (1951) is the most glaring omission from the Lead overalls.
Luke: I'd say Robert Blake in Electra Glide in Blue is a glaring one, Golden globe nominated as well lol and from an actor who has 2 wins to his name lol
RatedRStar: There are a few others like Ray Milland in Alias Nick Beal, Ernest Borgnine & Lee Marvin in Emperor Of The North, Helmut Berger in Ludwig and James Mason in The Last Of Sheila (I assume it's an ensemble). Laydu however has a much greater reputation.
Btw, if anyone wants to use any of these for future recommendations, I'd fully appreciate it since I'm already going with some animated films for the Voice Acting lineup, which I would like to have after the Oscars as well.
Alias Nick What?? lol
RatedRStar: Oh and Warren Oates in Dillinger.
Louis: Your thoughts on the second Glass trailer?
Luke: Is Dillinger good? I assume Oates is good, but not the film.
I've heard he gives at least a strong performance. Oates as John Dillinger would be a fairly interesting one to examine if Louis wants to.
Louis: What are your thoughts on the Joker flashback from the uncut version of Return of the Joker?
Louis: Your top 10 Anthony Hopkins acting moments
So "Bad Times at the El Royale."
This movie was made for me. Damn near perfectly pitched from start to finish, and I honestly think it manages to steer clear of Tarantino-esque self-indulgence. It actually felt like watching a classical play, from the staging to the dialogue, but still maintaining a cinematic edge.
The ensemble is utterly stunning, with Jeff Bridges gives one of the most revelatory performances of his career, with a heartbreaking soliloquy that deserves to be shown at the Oscars this year. But it's Cynthia Erivo who is the film's real secret weapon, giving a barnstormer of a breakout performance as a troubled songstress. Jon Hamm is a delightful scene-stealer, and Lewis Pullman might very well have one-upped his dad with his debut already. Hemsworth is probably the film's weak link for me, but he's still having a bundle of fun and I enjoyed him. Dakota Johnson's performance has a rough first scene, I'll admit, but by her final moments she is damned strong and if she hits those peaks in "Suspiria", we are in for a good time.
Definitely a film worthy of more acclaim and recognition than it has and likely will get, and certainly one I will be rewatching in the very near future.
So yeah, Louis, I expect to see some of the "El Royale" gang grace your end-of-year ratings. And I'm very curious to discuss category placement. I have them all in supporting myself, but one could make a lead argument for two of them.
Psifonian: I was sure Hemsworth was gonna be the standout. I hear he doesn't get much to do? I'm glad the cast is great.
He's fine, but the role requires a much more charismatic actor than he actually is. It's a departure from his typical shtick and he's entertaining, but I think Chrises Evans and Pratt would've been better choices for that sort of role, just off the top of my head.
Everyone: your top 5 for television shows this year thus far? For me,
Shows:
1. Atlanta
2. Better Call Saul
3. Silicon Valley
4. Westworld
5. It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia (so far)
Actor:
1. Bob Odenkirk, Better Call Saul
2. Benedict Cumberbatch, Patrick Melrose
3. Dan Stevens, Legion
4. Donald Glover, Atlanta
5. Jeffrey Wright, Westworld
Actress:
1. Rhea Seehorn, Better Call Saul
2. Thandie Newton, Westworld
3. Emma Stone, Maniac
4. Rachel Keller, Legion
5. Evan Rachel Wood, Westworld
Supporting Actor:
1. Zahn McClarnon, Westworld
2. Zach Woods, Silicon Valley
3. Glenn Howerton, It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia
4. Brian Tyree Henry, Atlanta
5. Peter Mullan, Westworld
Supporting Actress
1. Aubrey Plaza, Legion
2. Zazie Beetz, Atlanta
3. Jean Smart, Legion
4. Anna Madeley, Patrick Melrose
5. Kaitlin Olson, It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia
I am quite excited to see Bad Times at the El Royale, need a good film with some plot twists once in a while.
Calvin: I wish I was more of a tv person than I am lol just haven't the time to see much tv.
I did watch a few episodes of Strangers with John Simm and in his first fully english role Anthony Wong.
RatedRStar: Was it any good, John Simm has been one of my favourite TV actors since Life On Mars. I've been watching Bodyguard with Richard Madden lately and I've been enjoying it quite alot. Started watching Titans as well, Can't give an opinion on it just yet.
I'm glad you loved Atlanta, Calvin. One of the best shows right now, without a question.
Alex: It's a fantastic show. Though I will say that though I do find it consistently funny and frequently hilarious, my favourite episodes/moments are whenever it goes serious, whether it's with drama or with its social commentary.
Guys, any suggestions for 1998.
Lead
Sean Gullette - Pi
Christopher Lee - Jinnah
Shah Rukh Khan - Dil Se..
Rufus Sewell - Dark City
Hugo Weaving/Tony Martin - The Interview
John Hurt - Love And Death On Long Island
James Woods - Vampires
Michael Caine - Little Voice
Peter Mullan - My Name Is Joe
Clive Owen - Croupier
Supporting
Jim Caviezel/Sean Penn/Nick Nolte/Woody Harrelson - The Thin Red Line
Ulrich Thomsen/Henning Moritzen/Thomas Bo Larsen - Festen
Jean Reno - Ronin
Jim Caviezel/Sean Penn/Nick Nolte/Woody Harrelson - The Thin Red Line
Ulrich Thomsen/Henning Moritzen/Thomas Bo Larsen - Festen
Donald Sutherland - Without Limits
Robert Duvall - The Gingerbread Man
Jean Reno - Ronin
I saw The Old Man & The Gun today. It’s a damn entertaining movie, and I love that it manages to pack the story full of emotionally compelling characters and performances while still maintaining a relatively light tone.
Redford: 5
Affleck: 4 (Might go a little higher, we’ll see)
Spacek: 4
Glover: 3.5
Waits: 4
Sumpter: 3
Washington: 3
Moss: 4
Keith Carradine is in it too but he’s basically an extra.
Michael: Are there any performances from 2018 that you would prefer to be saved for the bonus round. I've got Robert Pattison in High Life, Paddy Considine in Journeyman and Marcello Fonte in Dogman (If no English subs copy comes by the end of February). You'll probably disagree with me here but I'd rather see Daveed Diggs for Blindspotting in the bonus round as well. I won't mind him being reviewed for the Alternate round if Fonte's pushed back.
High Life does have a 2018 release date in France but won't be released in the UK and USA until after March.
I'm beginning to believe Foster could get nominated this year for Leave No Trace.
Eh, I liked El Royale. A little too long and self-indulgent for my tastes, but I was engaged. Erivo and Not Tom Holland were my favorites.
Luke: Not really, though personally I don’t see much point in saving any peroformances for the Bonus Rounds
if you know about them already. That way there are less likely to be performances that are missed after the Bonus Rounds actually happen.
Also, I think a 5 for Cage in Mandy is unlikely.
Michael: I'd really like to see a review for Considine but I don't think he would make it into the alternates, so the bonus round is more preferable to me. Also, I barely found 5 performances for 2017 lead. I'd prefer to get the higher profile turns out of the way first then the hidden gems like Considine later on.
Lastly, does anyone seriously want to be left with nothing when we return to 2018.
2018 Oscars/Lead
Bradley Cooper - A Star Is Born
Viggo Mortensen - Green Book
Christian Bale - Vice
Ryan Gosling - First Man
Willem Dafoe - At Eternity's Gate
Alt. Rami Malek - Bohemian Rhapsody
2018 Oscars/Supporting
Mahershala Ali - Green Book
Ben Foster - Leave No Trace
John C. Reilly - Stan & Ollie
Sam Rockwell - Vice
Richard E. Grant - Can You Ever Forgive Me?
Alt. Sam Elliott - A Star Is Born
2018 Lead
Ethan Hawke - First Reformed
Ben Foster - Leave No Trace (If not nominated)
Clint Eastwood - The Mule
Rami Malek - Bohemian Rhapsody (If not nominated)
Robert Redford - The Old Man And The Gun
John Huston - The Other Side Of The Wind
John C. Reilly - The Sisters Brothers
Yoo Ah-In - Burning
Lakeith Stanfield - Sorry To Bother You
Daveed Diggs - Blindspotting
Sorry will get to the other requested thoughts, just have been busy on several fronts lately.
Contradicting that slightly I did see First Man, which I loved.
Fucking LOVED A Star is Born which I finally saw, though it's not flawless I'd say it hit me in all the right places. Cooper and Gaga are both easy 5's for me, I'm a huge advocate for a Sam Elliot nomination despite his limited screentime, and I'd say the screenplay is a hugely underrated asset of the film.
Louis: after you've gotten through your requested thoughts and finished business on those fronts, your thoughts on First Man and the cast sans Gosling.
Also watched A Star is Born. Not flawless indeed, but I liked it well enough.
Cooper- *CENSORED*
Gaga- 4.5
Elliott- 4/4.5
Chappelle- 3
Dice Clay- 3.5
And First Man, which I quite liked. The action scenes were quite thrilling. Also, this is going to sound weird, but I thought this film felt Malicky at times, in a very good way.
Gosling- *CENSORED*
Foy- 4
Chandler- 3.5
Stoll- 2.5
Clarke- 3
Hinds- 3
Anonymous:
Road to Perdition's screenplay is an example where a singular idea was gradually purged from the material. This purging began with pulling from the graphic novel source material where it pared down certain elements specific to that medium (more on that with A History of Violence), though some remained like Jude Law's hitman who has more in common with the Joker than an actual mob hitman. It did not stop there as this idea was furthered not only apparently through un-credited re-writes (judging by some of David Self's other work this may have extensive) but also in the editing of the film. This idea, which I would say is part of the criticism of the film in some though I find it to be to the overall narrative's benefit, which is to be less a gangster film, and more of a westernized redemptive samurai story with fedoras. It has more common with the films of Masaki Kobayashi than it does Martin Scorsese. This idea though was evidently one of slow realization though as even in the film's deleted scenes you see more in terms of fleshing out the overall gangster world of the period, which was simplified in the final film. It eventually was simplified down, which was within the screenplay however not an idea of the screenplay, to the story of fathers and sons. It is here that the power of the writing resides in its thematically rich realization of the Sullivans, Sullivan/Rooney, and The Rooneys, and how their separate dynamics overlap or override to find both the thrust of the plot, and the emotional stakes of the narrative. That is also where the power of the film eventually is found though it was an effort beyond the screenplay to find that most remarkable element therein.
Road to Perdition is a tremendous swan song for the great Conrad Hall that rightly earned him a posthumous Oscar win. It is simply a stunning looking film that amplifies those aforementioned ideas, and general style of the film. Again Hall doesn't shoot as much as a traditional noir, or gangster film. He takes a far more overtly grandiose approach more fitting to a western or a samurai epic. This creates a particularly unique looking film as it realizes that period aesthetic in rather different way. The detail is incredible only amplified by Hall's composition of every shot that so often focus on the individual within a grand tapestry of the environment around them. It is this very atypical match with this exact style of that western gangster, that amplifies the film brilliantly resulting in Hall's work being the film's greatest asset.
A History of Violence is another graphic novel adaptation, which seems to entail a few requirements. One being the removal of a far too common element in the medium which is shocking content for the sake of it, which is saying something since this is hardly a tame film as is. The reduction is both appreciated and necessary given how absurd it can become, such as the torso Richie of the comic. This also is in the removal of some ridiculous lines through the improved dialogue of the script, such as action hero line "best have your coffee first" featured in the graphic novel thankfully absent in the film. Of course the whole film is a notable expansion on the central idea reducing the exploitative qualities with an attempt to graft more humanity within the central narrative. What is maintained, more or less, as the plot beats are more or less the same, but the details are different. This is in the minor such as changes in the names of the characters, though also more expansive in terms of the idea of family. That idea is obviously already present in the graphic novel, but the screenplay brings far more depth to it. This is the wife discovering who her husband is, the husband revealing himself, the son's own descent towards violence, and the intelligent addition to make Tom's past based within family. The whole change of Richie is far more potent with his monologue being an arguable highlight of the film. The idea though shows the expansion beyond this just being about a man being found it. The screenplay takes towards the idea of it being this dissolution of the traditional family, that requires the purging of his past family to even attempt to regain what was lost.
As typical for the work of Peter Suschitzky, especially in regards to when he works with Cronenberg, is rather low key. The two together typically go for a mainly naturalistic approach, this being particularly strict in that regard. This is fitting to Cronenberg's approach in the film which isn't documentary like but rather strictly ordinary. This is purposeful and effectively so. The lighting is very to the point, moody, but fitting to just the shadows of a small town. It avoids overt expressionism. The composition and framing of shots has a similar philosophy, and effectiveness. They are dynamic but always in a "by chance" type of way. It is a well shot film, but doesn't make a show of it.
Calvin: What's your rating for Sam Elliott.
Luke: A strong 4.5
Calvin: I guess we're agreed then. :)
Definitely. Is Gaga still on the border between 4.5 and 5 for you?
Calvin: Yes, If I were to give her a 5 now it would be due to the strength of her musical performance scenes, but it's getting to the point where I can't hold off on giving it to her since I love those scenes so much.
And don't worry, Cooper's safe and sound.
Cooper's performance is easily my favourite of his career. I usually find him just a tad bit smarmy or insincere even in his best performances previously, but he broke me here. As for Gaga, I definitely could agree that she had a few moments of inexperience in some minor line readings, but she nailed every big scene, not just the musical performance ones, IMO.
Calvin: She's definitely very good at least in her other dramatic moments but I would have to rewatch those scenes to see whether they would go higher in my estimation. And that was easily the best performance I've seen from Cooper and I'm really looking forward to seeing more self-directed performances from him in future.
I haven't seen A Star is Born yet, but I hope that's the last A Star is Born film someone ever makes. I mean, how many of those films do we need? Is the story really that interesting that it needed to be remade three times?
Anonymous:
Reed:
1. Defending himself in court - The Devils
2. The Wedding - The Devils
3. Story of meeting Marcus Aurelius - Gladiator
4. Fighting the "doctor" - The Devils
5. Uncle Song - Tommy
6. Execution - The Devils
7. How to be a Gladiator - Gladiator
8. After murdering Nancy - Oliver!
9. Targeted for his own assassination - The Assassination Bureau
10. Sexual repressions - The Devils
11. Come here bullseye - Oliver!
12. Climax - The Assassination Bureau
13. Against the hysteria - The Devils
14. They squawk - Oliver!
15. Versus the French - The Assassination Bureau
16. Murdering Nancy - Oliver!
17. A Cure - Tommy
18. New gladiators - Gladiator
19. Rejecting the deviants - The Devils
20. Vulcan's Jealousy - The Adventures of Baron Munchausen
Luke:
Well let me start with half the Harry Potters
Philosopher's Stone - (Features some fine work from the talented John Seale, though I wouldn't say Columbus pushes him too much. Seale though achieves a wonderful little aesthetic though that captures a certain mood while still maintaining a certain generalized family film look. It doesn't push anything but it is fine work with some notable shots within the series as a whole particularly the arrival to Hogwarts.)
The Chamber of Secrets - (A step down as Roger Pratt mostly tries to replicate what Seale did and in most case less effectively. The lighting for the most part does its job, but just a lot of shots are far less refined in terms of framing and composition. Of course this is never to a truly problematic extent, but it is certainly lesser work.)
The Prisoner of Azkaban - (Well aside from that very questionable last shot, on both Michael Seresin's and Alfonso Cuaron's parts, this film's cinematography is perhaps the best of both worlds in regards to the philosophy of the series's aesthetic. In that it captures both the haunting with the magical in terms of lighting. Whether that be the grandeur of the flight with buck beak, or the horror of the werewolf. Seresin's work is wonderfully atmospheric and emotional. It also is considerable far more dynamic, aided of course by Cuaron's eye, but the two together create far more engrossing shots than seen in the other two shots. It essential part to the film's whole effort of taking the series to another level in cinematic terms.)
Matt:
One of the all time great Joker sequences in any medium. It is truly disturbing with such darkly shaded work from Hamill, that is made all the creepier as the Joker's trademark humor is still there though this time to a particularly vicious end. It too is an amazing sequence for the dynamic between the hero and villain, with such a notable moment of a vulnerability for Batman that isn't even hidden wholly within the rage. The final moment is especially powerful in every sense from Joker's moment of not laughing, to Batman at his own near final gasp, and the breakdown of Robin from laughing to crying.
Anonymous:
I've done that before.
Psifonian:
Plan to watch it soon.
Tahmeed:
It is without a doubt a good scene for Hanks who manages to not over play the sentiment in his performance that is particularly subtle in that moment yet doesn't at all feel out of character for Forrest.
Emi:
Eh I have to say the trailer is suggesting it might be more Split than Unbreakable (which is a bad thing for me). McAvoy looks fun again, Willis looks like he's trying, but Jackson looks like he's going a touch arch which is a shame given his turn in the first film. More than that though the trailer was just filled with a lot of those excessively on the nose Shyamalan lines. Hopefully the final film will have more nuance, but I'm losing even my cautious optimism towards the film.
Calvin:
First Man I do think might be a bit divisive overall, for some may have wanted more of a sequel to the Right Stuff than the very insular film that Chazelle ended up making. Now what probably won't be all that divisive are the technical aspects that are all pretty much impeccable from the incredible sound design, the marvelous score from Hurwitz once again, and Chazelle's direction of every single one of the action sequences that are some of the most visceral of any space travel film I've seen. Now the choice to make everything focus so much on Armstrong as truly the "first man" is perhaps less unanimous. As everything in the film is based around how it influences and effects the man towards that fateful flight. This leads to fewer details on the other men, and the program in general. I wouldn't have minded seeing The Right Stuff 2 (that is a great film after all), but I also loved this atypical approach to the story. For me it absolutely worked in bringing you into the man's space (no pun intended) both physically, and emotionally, which is notable given the introverted nature of the character. In the end I was surprised by just how affecting this minimalist approach was in the end, as I found myself on that "tears edge" by the end of the film in a way I did not expect. Again I loved it.
Foy - 4.5(The trailer very much misrepresents her performance, the scenes focused on her are the outliers for the character, and very much earned in the film as well as through her performance in the actual film. I really found her rather wonderful in the part, despite her accent slightly slipping a few times, finding a certain type of grace in the woman who is this certain balance to Gosling's Armstrong. Foy shows someone who is more emotional yet still reserved in her own way fitting a woman of an exact background. She delivers the right naturalism in the scenes of the home life, while bringing that emotional bluntness in the scenes that are shown to be her forcing herself out of her own emotional comfort zone by necessity. She brings the impact of those scenes with the right passion, but they really find their power through all those quieter moments of reaction showing the building concern for her husband's safety.)
Clarke, Chandler, Stoll - 3.5/3/3(Each are good in finding a bit of honesty to their characters in a very little actual focus. Whether it be Clarke as the more open yet similarly spirited man as Armstrong, Chandler doing his best as "a man in charge" again, and Stoll being a nice little troll of sorts.)
Louis: Is Chazelle your Director win now?
Matt:
Yes, very easily at the moment.
Yeah, I just got out of First Man and loved it as well. First film of the year to get me to tear up. Never thought I’d like a Chazelle joint this much.
Louis: Do you think Terrence Malick would've been a good choice to direct a 90s version of First Man (think The Thin Red Line)? I think the material could've suited him very well.
I just watched "Dont Worry, He Won't Get Far on Foot", and while I think the film is a little bit of a mess, I feel like Phoenix and Hill could potentially be interesting bonus reviews.
Louis: Your top 10 directors that deserve a comeback in your opinion.
Anyone have thoughts on the "Ben is Back" trailer?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7ckCekdGr8
I have to say, Hedges seems very promising in this. There are a couple moments in the trailer that already look like some of his best work. Julia Roberts on the other hand.. umm.. not terrible, but we'll have to wait and see.
A Star is Born and Bohemian Rhapsody going Drama at the Globes, interesting, I also think Willem Dafoe could miss out, I just dont see his film performing too well, he will need critic awards I feel.
Will get to all other thoughts I missed on the next post.
Bryan:
Actually, yes.
Post a Comment