Nicol Williamson did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Michael Marler in The Reckoning.
The Reckoning is a mostly effective character study, despite not everything exactly tying together, about an Irish/Englishman businessman dealing with the death of his father.
We return to Nicol Williamson, once again teamed with director Jack Gold, as an idiosyncratic figure, though a seemingly different type of man from his self-destructive soldier in The Bofors Gun. Here instead we have his Michael Marler, a successful businessman. We open the film though getting a glimpse of Michael in his relationship with his seemingly quite horrid wife. In this opening the one can already see the sheer command of self that Williamson has a performer that is pretty incredible all its own. This as we have each moment within his wife behavior that is equally disdainful and lusty towards Michael. Williamson's portrayal is brilliant, in presenting in a way both how Michael is complicit within the relationship but also how he isn't exactly interacting in what would deem a healthy one. This in her more immediate insult there is amazing moment in the twitch that Williamson realizes within his face just for a moment to convey how his wife's behavior does irk him. This all the same more verbally unleashing her disdain to match her own though wrapped within this strange lust. Williamson bringing to life an instance the intensity of the relationship. This as Williamson brings the viciousness of a lust based upon this certain hatred, as he lashes out in truth against her barbs towards him as an Irishman, while still prodding him sexually. Williamson's eyes capture a mania befitting the insanity of the relationship and showing the raw lust yet also painful nature of their tryst.
Williamson artfully changes gears as we see him go off to work. Williamson providing a greater refinement within the man fitting of a proper Englishman living as a businessman. Although with a fantastic intensity within his work, something that Williamson is one of the very best at, as in his eyes there is a strict conviction even just as he drives to get to work on time. Williamson within the office is simply brilliant and absolutely magnetic in crafting the man who moves through organization less like an office worker, and more of a warrior. This as Williamson brings a cutthroat quality within every moment within this sequence. This as he notes every strategy or idea within the company Williamson doesn't just merely say to someone, he seems to almost weaponize the words each time. This with a powerful lack of hesitation or concern. His articulation of every mistake of his boss Williamson brings this certain relish of a kill as though he's a hunter. Williamson treating every moment as though it is a battle within which Michael will eat whatever other dog he needs to survive. Williamson being exceptionally compelling in making this manner though seem so natural to the state of the man. This state of an innate intensity granting the history of a man almost as a sense of the immediate background of coming from a place or at least idea that one must fight to survive. Williamson brings this idea in every moment in showing a man who has fought for his place and aims to keep it.
Hearing from an injury of his Irish father though Michael must return home, and even as entering to see his sister and mother, it is of a different man. This as Williamson walks with a calmer step and there is a fare more purer kind joy in just his gentle greeting to his mother, than we had seen previously in Michael. This is followed by just an astonishing scene with Williamson as he sees his bedridden father, who has died in the meantime. Williamson brings such a tenderness in the greeting and a complete sense of the affection he feels for his father. In the moment of realizing his father has died Williamson's reaction is heartbreaking as he brings the tears slowly from his eyes, in realizing a man suddenly experiencing more vulnerable emotions that he's likely suppressed in his marriage and job. Williamson's work is simply stunning as he manages to create the moment with such honest of this sort of crafted naturalism within the emotion suddenly hitting the man as the tears begin to flow. Williamson is effectively quiet, in almost showing the boy who once lived within this realm, as we see him deal with his father's sudden death, and later hears of the cause of it from his father's realm, who reveals he was killed in a bar fight by a young hooligan. Williamson is fantastic by actually reducing his own intensity to moments of quiet contemplation of the news, filled with hatred for English police in the story, where Williamson reflects a more submissive and somber state of Michael.
Without the film stating it right away, what we see of what defines Michael through Williamson's deft performance. This as his heritage as an Irishman, to his English hating father whom he loves. In that Williamson creates two sides to the man, even though both sides Williamson shows is defined by this single aspect that create both sides. This as we follow Michael at home, where he has a brief affair with an older woman (Rachel Roberts). This where we see the tenderness of the young son seemingly trying to connect with his past on a more nostalgic quality. This even as he speaks of his father mainly speaking of his hatred with the English Williamson delivers it with a sentimental quality, earning this as his expression of a man thinking back upon his father whom he loved. This relationship, albeit brief, is contrast to his married one, though with a similar lustful quality within it at times. This also is in stark contrast though when we see Michael return to his job once again in the meantime before his father's funeral, and before he is expected to wreck havoc on the man who caused his father's death. Williamson is again rather astonishing in this sequence, this as he shows still the Irishman's son, as the savage businessman, this as man who designed his life believing, as his father taught him, that he must fight for everything. Williamson is compelling within himself. This in his striking barrage as he takes down a corporate rival and seems to shrink the man just through his verbal edge. This followed by an even greater moment, this just his eyes filled with this pure understated glee for the "kill" as he watches the man further defeated within a meeting. Williamson playing it so perfectly by both being incisive in a moment, then blithe in the next, almost twisting the knife into the other man, as though the man defeat shouldn't take up too much of his time.
Williamson finds a natural complexity though in creating the man that is Michael really is a mess of loyalties, expectations, and circumstance. This as in a later moment Michael ponders on the idea of needing to beat down a man for his father's death. He does this with a very honest and quite normal disbelief and exasperation of the whole idea. This as he expresses a man somewhat aware of being caught within his own strange situation. We see later as we watch him at a dinner party hosted by his wife. Williamson brings this tension within himself as he interacts guest with an increasingly hostile attitude. Williamson playing as man almost trying to attack what they represent to him still, just in his cutting sophisticated way, at first. Eventually Michael recognizes his father by singing a tune, much like his father, and this just an amazing moment for Williamson. This as he sings with a sense of pride in his voice, a sadness in his eyes, but also an awkwardness in his manner in this tribute. This as Williamson in this moment shows the strange tribute that Michael is to his father, this as he is trying to recognize him, but also not quite knowing how to do it. This becoming all the more evident right afterwards with a guest call him Irish in a derogatory way, leading to a rather instinctual violent reaction from Michael. Michael once again being the man designed by his father, in his own very sloppy way. This state of the man though is perhaps best revealed when Michael goes about his "revenge" by finding the young man with the intention of beating him with a blunt instrument. When he gets the man cornered, who pleads for mercy, Williamson's reaction is amazing. This as for a moment all the sense of real empathy and hesitation for the strange action comes to him, albeit briefly before he returns to beat the man for his father's name essentially. Williamson delivers an outstanding performance, particularly since I think he makes better sense of the central idea more so than the film itself does. This in Williamson's portrait of Michael, he creates a captivating realizing of a man defined by his father. This though in finding such complexity that even in a loving relationship, hatred can conspire into a broken man. Williamson not only making sense of this difficult idea but doing so with such masterful precision and power.
99 comments:
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast.
Really happy you loved this performance and can't wait for Excalibur.
Great review. 1970 really is a great year for performances.
Also a question for Louis. Have you seen maniac i remember Calvin speaking highly of the show and after watching it I understand way.
Jonah Hills best performance imo.
Just finished watching Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom. Am i the only one that was kinda disappointed here? But yeah, don’t really have much to say about it honestly. I give it a 6 out of 10/C+
Here are my ratings for the cast:
Chadwick Boseman - 5
Viola Davis - 4.5
Glynn Turman - 4
Colman Domingo - 3.5
Michael Potts - 3
Taylour Paige - 2.5
Dusan Brown - 2.5
Jonny Coyne - 2.5
Jeremy Shamos - 2.5
First Cow won for Picture, Flanigan won Actress, Wolfwalkers won Animated Feature. I don’t reallythink this NYFCC is really gonna affect the run much, other than Lindo and maybe Boseman
I thought Ma Rainey's Black Bottom was pretty good, bur it is glaringly obvious at all times that it was originally a play, sometimes distractingly so, other times not, which might be the result of George C. Wolfe being much more prominent as a theatre director than a film director. I'll say though that the material is so strong I can look past that, as I was always invested in the film, partly due to my own love of blues music and blues history, but also largely due to the extraordinary performance at the center of it.
Boseman-5
Davis-4(She could be a 4.5 but I felt she was overshadowed to almost a ridiculous degree, and also there were some elements that didn't really land for me. Overall though, it's strong work. Incidentally, she could almost be argued as more supporting here than she was in Fences.)
Turman-4(Glad to see him again so soon.)
Domingo-4
Potts-3
Paige-3
Brown-3
Coyne and Shamos-2
So I guess my top 5 for lead actor at the moment would be as follows:
1. Chadwick Boseman in Ma Rainey's Black Bottom
2. Delroy Lindo in Da 5 Bloods
3. Gary Oldman in Mank
4. Leslie Odom Jr. in Hamilton
5. Jesse Plemons in I'm Thinking of Ending Things
Also watching Boseman in this made me realize for the first time what a powerhouse theatre actor he probably could have been.
Luke:
Roberts - 4(Far more limited role than the other times I've seen her. However again she brings such an honesty within her work. This in portraying both the qualities almost a fantastical sort of lust, of the woman living out a dream. Doing so that is both overtly sexual but with this sense of craving a more direct affection within that.)
Bell - 3.5(Delivers well a matching kind of intensity against Williamson in portraying the same type of combined, more hollow, and vicious lust in their scenes together. This in her bringing that combined with this overt sense of consistent disdain as well.)
John Smith:
I have not.
My current Top Five for Best Actor would be...
1. Mikkelsen
2. Lindo
3. Ahmed
4. Boseman
5. Oldman
I know we have Hopkins and Yeun still to come but I'm praying for a Mikkelsen win, Personally he deserves it after coming so close for The Hunt.
I’m almost 100% Mikkelsen is winning the overall. Especially if Hopkins won’t be counted in as 2020 under Louis’ guidelines (we’ll see).
I’m beginning to think Raci has a serious chance at a nomination.
Calvin: Louis is accepting the MOMA Virtual screening on New Year's Eve.
Louis: Thoughts on the "Harry hates everybody" scene from the first Dirty Harry movie? Also, thoughts on the voice of John Mitchum.
Watched Another Round. Definitely one of the best of the year. A (9.5/10)
Here are my ratings for the cast:
Mads Mikkelsen - 5 (it’s going to be hard to pick my Best Lead Actor of 2020)
Thomas Bo Larsen - 4
Lars Ranthe - 4
Magnus Millang - 4
Maria Bonnevie - 4
It's a little random, but I revisited "The Lincoln Lawyer" last night, and it was about what I remembered: A decent court room thriller overall, despite it's story being a tad sloppy and overlong. It's also interesting to view the film as part of the "McConaissance", both as a prelude to that period and a reminder of why it happened in the first place.
McConaughey - 4
Tomei - 3
Macy - 3
Lucas - 3
Cranston - 2.5
Legiuzamo - 2.5
Pena - 2.5
Phillippe - 2 (I never "got" him, to be honest - not that your supposed to like his character here, but I still felt he was rather insufferable in the role)
Hello everyone. Have you all discussed your thoughts and ratings of Mank and The Prom performances? I can't find it anywhere...
moviefilm: You can find the Mank rating/thoughts in Bokeem Woodbines' review for Jason's Lyric.
As far as I know, only Calvin & Omar have seen The Prom though. Not sure about anyone else.
Guess it really is Ahmed who’s going to be taking that 5th spot now. We’ll have to see if anything changes up but it’s probably going to be Boseman, Hopkins, Lindo, Oldman, and Ahmed then (although one never knows, but Yeun desperately needs to get into the major awards now). Glad to see Youn Yuh-Jung got LAFCA though. And Mulligan seems like an inspired choice, this definitely helps her chances.
Anonymous:
Brazen in pretty much a way only a 70's would do, but pretty much sums up Harry in a quick instance, with his equality defined by hating all.
Well he pretty much sounds like his brother, with a softer version of his voice.
Calvin:
Yeah I think we now know what is probably the five in lead actor...probably....though given how much time there is even till SAG and Globes...who knows for sure.
Supporting actor though...I have to say rarely has my potential nominee radar been off by so much with Raci, Turman and Boseman being the winners so far. I still don't think all will translate, but an interesting turn of events.
Thank heavens for Mulligan. Been unpleasant to see her wait 11 years for her 2nd nomination.
Louis: Any thoughts on the Actress wins.
Luke:
For lead so far, McDormand is to be expected. Flanigan seems like a prime candidate for the Indie Spirit win, I have a hard time seeing the Academy embracing that film (even disregarding my own feelings)...but this year is this year...so I won't count her out, however she and the film scream "Critics only". Mulligan needs any momentum she can get, that's a start...but not a guarantee.
Supporting Actress, any love that Youn gets is a good thing for her, however let's not forget about the critical love for Yeun for Burning and how that turned out. I think though if the passion stays she could make it, based on how thin the category is. Bakalova...I just don't see happening. I just see too much of a bias against the nature of the performance.
How are we all dealing with Small Axe? Is it a miniseries or are they individual films?
Matt: They're individual films but were first shown on BBC television.
Individual films. And most of them are very great.
Also if with Ahmed, Youn and Yeun, and Awkwafina and Zhao last year, there’s another shutout of Asian acting nominees, I’m gonna cry foul and say, there is without doubt that there’s some anti-Asian bias/racism in the Academy’s ranks. At least Zhao is a lock for a Best Director nomination.
Not to mention Parasite getting shut out of acting nominations, of course.
Matt:
I've been on the fence, but leaning towards giving them the exception just for this year like Bad Education (though then each must be considered as separate pieces).
Matt:
Side Note though, I think that LA winner choice is bunk, since either they are a whole therefore television, or you need to take them as separate films.
Louis: Yeah, that's why I asked, because you can't give different films best picture.
Matt:
Very much agreed, particularly as the series is not entirely consistent in quality (though none of the 4 I watched are bad, it goes from greatness to just fine).
Louis: Thoughts on the Small Axe films you've seen plus ratings and thoughts on the casts.
Luke:
Mangrove - (The best of the films, and I'll say a little unfortunate that it opens with it, as it set up my expectations quite high only for them to diminish a bit. This just as this one feels a stone cold terrific film that would live on its own merits, where the other films benefit from being part of a piece. This as it features some of McQueen's most precise and least fussy direction and easily is his best written film period. This actually even seeming to show "Trial of the Chicago Seven" how it it is done in some ways. This as we understand where the characters are coming from while just having incredible drama within the court proceedings.)
Lovers Rock - (Where Mangrove was more writing centered this is entirely built upon McQueen's direction, too much so I'd say as the film is sort of an extended version of the birthday scene in City of God. I will say I more admired the technique more so than I was entirely caught up with it. I think eventually its too minimalist for its own good, and after awhile it didn't hold my focus, despite the thoughtful touches in McQueen's visuals and use of music. I just wished I had gotten more character to carry me through the night.)
Red, White and Blue - (Very good, but feels like half a movie. Given the eventual success of Boyega's character, I would've thought they would've continued to follow him, as the film feels like it gets cut off rather than ends. Having said that, it is good up until that abrupt ending. This in showing such a detailed experience with a strong leading anchor all the way through it. This granting both the specific hardships in his course both within his own community and within his job. Again, only wish it had been a complete film, rather than sort of middle ground between a short film and a feature.)
Alex Wheatle - (Didn't get much out of it honestly. It's "fine". There's nothing wrong with it, but nothing really stands out about it in any major way. All the scenes are okay, decent enough, but never do the character's become that compelling nor does the titular Alex's experience become that vivid. Exactly why it shouldn't be considered a singular piece as this is considerably less successful than Mangrove.)
Mangrove:
Wright - 4.5(Terrific in bringing the firebrand energy to the proceedings. This though in balancing in the moments where she's not that. This just finding the right life to the character in portraying the organizer and the crusader in equal measure. This though in wholly excelling within her spotlight scenes and delivering the thunder so to speak both in court and in her individual speech about staying together. Each one she excels with it and gives a magnetic and properly passionate portrayal.)
Kirby - 4(Most notable for his big cross examination scene where he is indeed great in delivering every single cutting remark with such a specific energy and power to it. Otherwise though just offering a right sense of sympathy within the plight that remarkably builds towards that centerpiece courtroom moment.)
Parkes - 4(Very good as the sort of pseudo modest lead at the center of it all. This though in offering the right presence as this sort of man who is trying to make a stand though doing so in a far more modest way than his more overtly passionate compatriots. He's very effective though in this modesty particularly in terms of internalizing the emotional state of the man during the trial. I especially thought his final reaction was simply tremendous.)
Sandall - 4(Although I really think all the defendants are good, thought she very often stood out in her reactions throughout. This conveying the sense of anger towards trying to find her fair shake and realize the equality. Her portrayal though finding the right nuance in bringing the humanity that drives the anger and discontent so powerfully.)
Lowden - 4(Quite good here in providing the radical style lawyer. Although his part is purposefully limited, he's particularly good in portraying the combination of sympathy but almost a certain gamesmanship of someone wanting to help people make a stand. Lowden's particularly good in the first court scene in his attempts to be cutting and then his reactions in coming against the hard and seemingly, initially, hostile judge.)
Jennings - 3.5(Quite liked how he offered seemingly the same "immovable object" style presence initially as was found with Langella in "Chicago Seven" though we slowly find out his judge is far fairer despite initial perspective. Jennings though maintains the same sort of manner, portraying a man who maintains a specific position within the law no matter the circumstances.)
Lover's Rock:
Everyone is good, but it is an fairly extreme case of a "Director's film".
Red, White and Blue:
Boyega - 4.5(Perhaps his best work so far, even as I do think the film cuts him off early. This as he brings such a strong sense of the character's conviction. This that he finds a real nuance with. This as we see the more overt passion of it in certain moment in wanting the change for good. We also though see the quiet assurance of a man who wants to do the right thing. Most importantly though in the act he finds a terrific combination of manners. This with the intensity needed to be police officer, but also the certain humor in trying to still connect with his community. This though with the right sense of discontent in his interactions with his racist fellow officers with a more overt rage, against his more personal and sympathetic frustration with his family and friends who struggle to understand his choice. Boyega's presence carries the film and he also so artfully such a vivid sense of the man's pioneering journey.)
Toussaint - 3.5(Offers a good sense of the complicated relationship his character has with his son. This in creating a sense of love even in the sense of a kind disappointment. He's good in offering a certain warmth within the interactions even when there is also a palatable somberness at the same time.)
Alex Wheatle:
Cole - 4(I'll say to an extent his story felt at a distance, just because this film felt the least concise, and seemingly couldn't decide if it wanted to be a mood piece like Lover's Rock or a more plot intensive piece like the other two. Cole to his part though is good in creating just an honest enough lead. This in creating enough of a sense of the man taking in what is around him and realizing his state of being. Sadly his story remains a little oddly vague in the scheme of the film, but he is good.)
Gee - 3.5(More than fine as really this mentor character, who perhaps make his statements too late in the proceedings. Gee though delivers this though with a wonderful off-beat quality that is traditionally powerful while done in its own idiosyncratic fashion.)
Perhaps I'm being too optimistic but I don't think Youn Yuh Jung should be compared to Steven and Song Kang Ho/Parasite because Youn has actually consistently racked up regional Critics nominations across the country, unlike Yeun and Song. Yes, they are only Critics Awards, but aside from Seyfried, Youn has actually been getting awards unlike "supposed" supporting actress frontrunner like Colman, Burstyn and Close
I also think a big thing that needs to be done for Minari is they need to keep pushing it as an American film, which it is.
Decided to wrap Small Axe and watched Education which...is more cohesive than Alex Wheatle but feels like a first act, then part of a second act, then that's it. Just kind of loses its focus a bit, and is a little all over the place. All these different places are good on their own, but again one that needed more time to grow I think. There's a lot I wanted it to explore, but sadly it just kind of ends, and not in a satisfying first half way RWB did either.
Sandy - 3.5(He gets a bit lost in the narrative but he is good in portraying the singular struggle of the dyslexic kid. This in bringing a real honesty in his insistence that there's nothing wrong with him, when he does have a difficulty. It's very naturally portrayed towards someone who doesn't know they can find help, and that it isn't his fault. It's a good performance even if he loses his lead status as the film goes on.)
Lawrence & Whyte - 3(Both are good but again the dynamic of the family is definitely something I wanted explored more. We get a slight sense of it through their effective turns that create a believable dynamic, but sadly I wanted it to dive deeper.)
Ackie & Simon - 3(Both are good in portraying the quietly supportive activists. Again this idea I feel needed more exploring but they are good with the bit they have.)
I'd rank em as:
1. Mangrove
2. Red, White and Blue
3. Lovers Rock
4. Education
5. Alex Wheatle
Anonymous:
Not to be too blunt, but the only thing more meaningless to Oscar voters than critics awards, are critic nominations. If Youn gets in for SAG, then I'll hear it, until then let's wait. I mean Awkwafina got a Globe win, and that didn't matter either.
Calvin:
Sadly The Farewell had that same element, and we know how that turned out. I'll be the first to say I hope I'm completely wrong about this, but the track record just isn't there.
I completely agree Louis. Don't worry I get you completely - I do like how measured and evenhanded this board is generally on these matters beforehand. We'll have to wait and see.
Louis if you finished the Mandalorian can I get a cast ranking for season 2?
Anonymous:
Can't say the acting really is what one comes for....also the whole, we're a show to make 500 other shows has almost entirely cleared away even the fairly vague interest I've had left for the show.
1. Bill Burr
2. Pedro Pascal
3. Rosario Dawson
4. Richard Brake
5. Temuera Morrison
6. Giancarlo Esposito
7. Katee Sackhoff
8. Carl Weathers
9. Timothy Olyphant
10. Omid Abtahi
11. John Leguizamo
12. Titus Welliver
13. Michael Biehn (what a waste)
14. Ming-Na Wen
15. Horatio Sanz
16. Mercedes Varnado
17. Gina Carano
18. Diana Lee Inosanto
19. Amy Sedaris
Did the obvious holiday rewatch of It's A Wonderful Life, and I think I now have to call Jimmy Stewart my favourite actor, despite barely having scratched the surface of his filmography yet.
Also, just for fun, because I don't think I've given them before, my ratings for the cast, minus Stewart, who's obviously a perfect 5, come on.
Reed-4.5
Barrymore-5
Mitchell-4.5
Travers-5
Warner-4
Faylen and Bond-3
Hinds-3.5
Grahame-3
Albertson-3
Anderson-2.5
Leonard-3
Whoever plays the guy who's dumbstruck in the "Angel 2nd Class" scene-3.5(One scene, but every one of his reactions is hilarious)
Agreed with every one of those ratings except that I might just give Reed a 5, and Hinds is probably a 4 for me. And yeah the dumbstruck guy is amazing.
Calvin: Yeah, Reed probably should be a 5 actually.
Yeah, Reed is easily a 5 for me. She's simply lovely in her role.
i don't really know, i would give her a 4.5. Hard to describe, i just feel off saying she was a 5
Louis: your thoughts on William Fichtner and Djimon Houndsou as Actors?
Louis, have you given your thoughts on the cinematography, direction and script for the south korean film Bruning? I cany find tuose thoughts anywhere.
Bryan: Thank you!
Omar, Calvin & anyone else who's seen The Prom: What are your ratings and thoughts on its performances?
Moviefilm: I saw Calvin's analysis on his Letterboxd profile and James Corden sucked again as per usual.
Has Corden ever been good? I haven't seen Into the Woods, but I find it hard to believe he's good in it.
Matt: He's a surprisingly good fit for the Baker. His worst tendencies aren't on display either. That said, rewatching the 1991 stage filming, I prefer Chip Zien.
Matt: That's the only time I ever found him earnest rather than obnoxious throughout an entire performance from him. He did on occasion have those moments in BBC's Gavin and Stacey (Rob Brydon's my favourite thing about that show) but they were few and far between.
For what it's worth, I found Corden surprisingly decent in Ocean's Eight.
Matt: In regards to Corden, I did like him in "Into the Woods" at least. My issues with his film work aren't really tied to a lack of charm or humour, but rather Corden being a "personality" more than an actor in a traditional sense. As such, there is a certain style and range from Corden that can be put to good use, but can also be far too excessive if funneled in the wrong direction.
Mitchell: I think his public persona definitely dictated subsequent roles in terms of how he played them. He’s now no different than any other comedian over-reliant on a shtick.
I can’t believe this is the year of all years that I’m rooting against one of my favourite actors ever, Gary Oldman getting a nomination. 2020 really hits different huh.
Another reason why I loved Another Round, an example, the brilliantly directed diner scene at the start, when Mikkelsen is about to burst into tears, I just loved the reactions of everyone else, like it felt like a real warm friendship between the 4 of them.
I also think that Bo Larsen is not a 4 at all, I think he is easily review worthy.
Like Mikkelsens reaction for example when they ask if he considers anyone else, his reaction is just perfect, in how his wife cared for his dad.
I find it funny that Vinterberg basically just assembled the cast of The Hunt again.
I actually agree that Larsen could be bumped up. All of the friends were brilliant.
Today I finally got to watch The Late Show. I really liked the movie and it was just Louis doing Art Carney wins the overrall.
Louis a doubt: for you is Lily Tomlin a lead or a supporting?
Anyone seen the Borat sequel? If so how good is Bakalova actually lol
Anonymous: I actually kind of loved it, and Bakalova would be an absolutely inspired nominee.
Bakalova is good but she's not really supporting. I wouldn't mind her getting in, though I've yet to see all the contenders.
Louis: Regarding that ultimate focus lens that Toland was working on before he passed away, he actually managed to compose a shot with it. According to the short-lived magazine Sequence, the shot had everything in focus, with a face of a person filling one-third of the left side of the frame, another face which was in the center of the foreground and the rear wall of the studio (a hundred yards away), which showed the telephone wires and architectural details.
Louis: not that it actually matters one way or the other, but what are your category placements for the Hillbilly Elegy performances? I just saw someone argue that Adams could be argued as supporting. Either way she's at the bottom of my ranking, but would be nice to know your thoughts.
Louis: Could Bo Larsen go up for Another Round? I completely agree with Daniel, I'd love to see a review for him as well.
Happy Birthday to Ralph Fiennes, one of the most talented British (and overall) actors of his generation......
...and me.
Happy Birthday Bryan. :)
Happy bday bryan!!!
Luke & John Smith: Thanks!
Happy Birthday Bryan!!
Happy Birthday Bryan!!!
Corden is simply insufferable to me in anything he's in and I hate that he keeps showing up when he doesn't have much talent.
Oh, happy birthday by the way to Bryan and Ralph Fiennes.
Happy Birthday Bryan!
Time to watch 'It's a wonderfull life' for the first time.
Louis: Your thoughts on the 'Waterloo' scene from Muriel's Wedding.
Daniel, Matthew, Anonymous & Tahmeed: Thank you.
Happy birthday Bryan :D
Happy Birthday Bryan! Hope I'm not too late, lol...
Calvin: Thanks. I might use one of my birthday wishes on you getting into a Minari virtual screening haha.
Emi: Don’t worry, just in time. Thanks.
Happy Birthday Bryan, you’re a good dude.
Thank you, Michael
Luke, what's next from the 1980s.
Anonymous: 80/81 though I personally would rather have Backlog Vol. 2 and recommendations (Which is now a yearly tradition) before 2020.
Luke, I agree. I want Hopkins up to a 4.5 at least for The Remains Of The Day.
How do you guys know the order he's going in?
Matt: I'm going by the order that he went with during the alternates which he has mostly followed with a few exceptions like 83 or 96.
And the 80s have always come after the 70s.
Happy birthday, Bryan!
Happy Birthday, Bryan!
Happy Birthday, Bryan!
I, by the way have the same birthday as Willem Dafoe! I find that cool too
John Smith: Wait ... is that legal?
Aidan, Robert & Tim: Thank you gents!
I'm a little late to the party, but happy birthday Bryan!
Also, to add to yours and Tim's comments, I share a birthday with F. Murray Abraham and Kevin Kline.
John Smith:
Around that year's alternates should be some of that.
Tim:
Fichtner is a good consistent character actor. He pretty much brings what he needs as a typically somewhat smarmy authority type. This with the variation being how much emotional range is asked of him in that type. He generally delivers enough within that range, which is limited within that scheme. He's one though who generally is used for that one thing, but does that one thing well, with slight variations. Haven't seen him really tested one way or another, but rather is consistently kept within his type.
I find Hounsou to be a two note actor, this to almost a comical degree with how extreme those two notes are apart. This as he's either yelling his lines at the top of his lungs with a wild mania, or whispering them with a zen like demeanor. This with little to no in-between in his performances. He certainly can hit those notes, but haven't really seen him do anything beyond that sort of constriction.
Shaggy:
Lead.
Anonymous:
Shame he died before completing his work.
Calvin:
I mean I don't categorize my "worst of" lists so it doesn't matter too much. Nonetheless I put Adams lead as the film centers it often around her breakdowns, but she could be supporting.
Tahmeed:
Not out of the question.
Luke:
Beautiful bit of kind of owning a moment even within a certain purposeful kitschy awkwardness, and just really being a great example of showing the charm of both Griffiths and Collette's performances. Both really are so wonderfully silly and over the top, though in a way the scene is made by the sheer satisfaction of them against hte discontent of the "mean girls".
Bryan:
Happy birthday.
Post a Comment