Lucas Black did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Jimmy Blevins in All the Pretty Horses.
All the Pretty Horses is a bit of a failure as a film, and marked the immediate end to Billy Bob Thornton as a potentially notable director despite his success with Sling Blade, though the film falters in more than a few ways in its tale about two cowboys who go through quite a lot while searching for work, I think one of the central flaws is in the main casting of the romantic leads (Matt Damon, Penelope Cruz) who are both dull and out of place within the style Thornton seems to be going for.
Supporting my point to an extent I think here is one of the few carry overs from Thornton's previous film, Lucas Black, the young performer who gave a successful performance as the young boy who befriends the unusual central character of Sling Blade. Black appears here, and again, despite being a little bit older, maintains that feeling of authenticity, notably missing from Damon's turn. Black appears a strange young man riding a seeming stolen horse who comes across the other two men of Damon and his riding partner (Henry Thomas). Black's performance honestly does seem out of a different movie, or perhaps the movie Thornton was unsuccessfully trying to make. Black brings an off-beat energy to his performance, though also distinctly feels honest to the setting and attempted style of the film. This as he brings this certain bluster that he plays just the right way, to be too much in regards towards how the characters see him within the film, but not too much that he becomes obvious within his own acting. Black finds the right elegant balance there, and has this right nonsensical, but also quietly endearing power to the role. Black makes his Jimmy Blevins, who rides on what seems like a stolen horse, a fool but a fool you don't dislike.
Eventually we find him again as the prisoner of a corrupt Mexican prisoner, where he has been mistreated and abused. Black's work again is just engaging at a far more complex and interesting level then his co-stars. This as there is a real sense of intensity and even dread in the moment of finding in the prison. Black giving a sense of what the boy has been through, but also still a sense of the earnest seeming innocence that still exists in the kid. Black's recounting of the boy's story, in which he killed several men. Black's performance is terrific in this moment as he manages to create a sense of the kid's character as in his delivery of explaining what happened, Black is able to craft some sense of innocence even though it involved the death of the men. He delivers the right earnestness about even as there is this somber undercurrent showing the pain of the situation, while also showing more than anything the boy ran into problems as a fool not with maliciousness. Black ends up being quietly heartbreaking in his final scenes this as he still carries that same earnestness in his manner as the boy's spirit isn't completely gone as dire as his situation appears. Black brings a troubled optimism as he believes there's something for him still even as it is clear his captors have little interest in his side of the story. Black is altogether great in his final scene in portraying the moment of realization that he is about to be taken to be executed. This just physically showing the boy doing everything to try to fight in his escape, and being wholly devastating conveying the terrible sense of fear as he is taken off to his death. The last frame of his performance being rather haunting n showing the boy finally fully understanding where it is that he is going. Although it isn't saying much to say he's the best part of the film, his work suggests the path the film could've or should've taken, that feels this authentic tale of the modern west, not some glossy Hollywood nonsense that the rest of the film comes off as. Although I think Black is an actor who is often cast in the wrong films, glossy Hollywood nonsense, he's actually consistently good when given the right role with the material that serves his honest and unfussy presence as a performer.
74 comments:
Okay, Irons is definitely being reviewed last. I suppose you want to leave the garbage to the very end.
Ratings and any thoughts on the rest of the cast.
Haven't seen this, but apparently the main character in the novel is about 16 and he's played here by 30-year-old Matt Damon.
Matt: I for one am ready for a remake with Ben Platt in the lead role.
your thoughts on the Direction of Sling Blade?
Apparently Weinstein cut this one to ribbons to spite Thorton for not cutting Sling Blade enough.
It's funny, I was just thinking "I remember them REALLY trying to make Lucas Black a thing for a while, what happened?" and then I glanced at his Twitter.
Luke:
Damon - 2(He's actually not terrible just in terms of some general moments, but still he's largely dull. The major problem though is he's just not right for the role and seems often detached from the material which is the biggest problem. He definitely tries however can really overcome his obvious miscasting.)
Thomas - 2(Probably tries harder than Damon to feel relevant to the material, and that is part of the problem. His performance in terms of accent feels very overwrought and over the top. This while still seeming just as out of place as Damon unfortunately.)
Cruz- 2(She's just kind of forgettable more than anything.)
Blades - 3(Honestly find that he's always good, including bad films based on Cormac McCarthy's writing. This is no different adding the appropriate sort of actual sense of the character and setting.)
Matt:
Ahh, the actor's path to self-destruction since 2006.
Tim:
Thornton's direction from Sling Blade feels very much in line fittingly with Jim Jarmusch (who is in the film), but also I'd say Wim Wenders's work with Paris, Texas. This is that often scenes are about the seemingly mundane and his work is finding what is compelling within such situations. Helped by his greater screenplay, however his direction here is founded by restraint. This including the scenes of the most intense moments involving Yoakam's characters, which he actually makes more brutal by playing them so quietly in terms of his direction leaving them as often the unpleasant elephant in the room. Many moments though are these careful, and rather remarkable touches, such as the recounting of the sling blade, where he puts unsettling touches in the sound design, while leaving the camera on himself in a simple though quietly atmospheric shot. They aren't big choices, but they are quite effective choices that illustrate the nature of the story, while we see Karl's aggressively to the point recounting of his murder. Or the final murder, that is brilliantly handled by Thornton's particular restraint. So many scenes work just in Thornton leaving the camera, like his use of J.T. Walsh's speeches, and again, wholly gives you the purpose of the scene, amplifies and through such simplicity. Thornton's work here actually is so on point, one ponders what happened with the rest of his directing career, though maybe this was the one story he had in him.
Louis: Your thoughts on the Succession season 3 premiere and your episode MVP?
Marcus:
LOVED IT, particularly just how it just got off the ground running, instantly setting up dynamics, increasing tension and not losing a beat from the finale of last season. Especially loved everything in the car ride from the press conference. MVP for me was probably Strong, though Braun was not far behind for delivering pure comic gold with every one of his lines.
Matt: Still can't match the Twitter Heavyweight Champion in that regard, James Woods.
I found a late answer to what Mitchell asked some days ago, about a central performance that completely saves a show. Tim Allen in Last Man Standing. The supporting cast around him is actually fine, but that's it, fine. And honestly, the show is filled with Boomer Humor to the max, but Allen honestly makes it really watchable
Louis: While I do think Karloff would be a perfect Wake, what do you think of the idea of Walter Huston playing that part for a 40's The Lighthouse? I was also thinking the younger Huston for director and screenwriter of that version.
Tim: I'm gonna disagree HARD on that one.
8000's:
I mean based on The Devil and Daniel Webster most definitely, though I think in turn William Dieterle would be more ideal for director in terms of crafting the appropriate atmosphere for the film. Although the younger Huston could do a thick kind of atmosphere it wasn't his natural setting.
Louis: Your thoughts on the screenplay and direction for Sing Street, and your top 5 Jack Reynor acting moments?
Louis: Your thoughts on these scenes from White Heat.
"Cody stops Verna from escaping"
"My radio ain't working again"
"Cody admits his loneliness"
"Cody finds out Fallon is a cop"
Top 10 worst best original song winners?
Seeing as how Halloween is coming up, what would be everyone's thoughts on the following songs, and their use within each respective film?
Man Behind The Mask - Jason Lives
Red Right Hand - Scream
Hex Girls - Scooby Doo and the Witch's Ghost
It's Terror Time Again - Scooby Doo on Zombie Island
I'll admit, revisting those last two hit me with a good dose of nostalgia, right when I was needing it most.
Somewhat related to Mitchell's question: If anyone has listened to "Screen Violence" by CHVRCHES, what horror/thrillers could you attach to each song on the album? So far I got:
"He Said, She Said" - Rosemary's Baby
"Violent Delights" - Nightmare on Elm Street
"California" - Anything based in L.A. though Drive comes to mind
"Final Girl" - It Follows
"Good Girls" - Promising Young Woman
If you guys haven't listed to it, I highly recommend it. It's one of the few albums I've listened to that feels catered to cinephiles. Even Letterboxd just interviewed them over it.
Watched The Wolfman (2010) which SUCKS, but I do have a question. Does Anthony Hopkins have it in his contract that no matter what the part is he gets to play the piano at some point?
Oh yeah, cast ratings for The Wolfman, cause why not.
Del Toro-1.5(I know it was his passion project and all but he is miscast like CRAZY.)
Hopkins-1.5
Blunt-2.5
Weaving-3(God bless him.)
Louis: Which roles would you say Michael J. Fox could play, be it for improvement or just suitable ones (basically in a dream reality where he never gets Parkinson's)?
Matt: It's a minor point for the film, but I thought it would've been smart to discard Talbot's human looking face while he was in wolf form. I get that they were paying homage to the original, but simply adding more hair to someone's face just makes them look like they have hypertrichosis. You could do more with the pointed, predatory design of a canine muzzle, I think.
Also, has anyone here seen the "Shape Shifters" short from "Love, Death & Robots"? It's simple enough from a story perspective, but it's final fight is pretty gnarly.
Lastly, anyone have thoughts on the "Uncharted" trailer?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F4BbkcI1HE
Personally, my immediate reaction could be summed up as followed:
-Since they obviously couldn't get Nathan Fillion, I guess Holland will have to due as Drake
-Wahlberg DID NOT need to be in this film, much less play Sully
-Chloe looks decent
My review of Free Guy is out. It was written for a test, but it has been treated with the same care as my other reviews. Hope my english teacher gives me an A.
Mitchell: Meh, not interested at all in the Uncharted live-action movie.
Mitchell: "Sully doesn't have any friends. I should know, I'm one of them."
I'm confused. I thought this would be a prequel that would lead into the game series, but they are using scenes from later games now.
Ever since i saw that short film with Nathan Fillion and Stephen Lang i have been very hesitant on this on principle. And now i am sure that i hate this casting. When the actor playing Sully a) DOESN'T HAVE A FUCKING STACHE and b) gives more of a Drake vibe than the one playing Drake ... I'm out.
If i had never played Uncharted, i would still think ít looks kind of generic. Throw Dwayne Johnson in that trailer, i would not bat an eye
This is the worst video game to film casting ever period.
Luke: Considering well got John Leguizamo as Luigi and John Claude Van Damme as Guile...that's saying a lot.
Truthfully, I'm not surprised that Holland was chosen since he's a young star with a decent background in action centered roles. He's still WAY too young, don't get me wrong, but I can see the logic beside his casting.
Wahlberg, on the other hand, is just a bizarre choice for Sully, and one that probably shows where the film maker's priorities lay. Why the likes of Stephen Lang (or a potential choice for me, Kelsey Grammer) weren't consulted I'll never know.
I was gonna say, I think Jean-Claude Van Damme as an All-American Hero is still worse.
RIP Martha Henry. A lot of you guys probably don't know her, but she was a legend of Canadian theatre.
Loved Dune. This is an example where I can understand the reservations if one wished it was more expansive like the novel particularly in terms of focus on particular characters, however given the mess that was Lynch's film in particular, I think Villeneuve and crew made the right decision to narrow the focus to Paul's hero journey, and suggest the overarching world more often than getting caught into its aggressively sprawling narrative. My only real complaint can be potentially removed in the future, which is it definitely is a part 1 in its ending, but as long as we get a part 2, that reservation should be removed. And my only fake complaint, is the pronunciation of Harkonnen was cooler in the Lynch version. Otherwise though, I just loved everything in terms of the scope and spectacle. I mean Villeneuve can world build and atmosphere build all day as far as I'm concerned, and I will be gripped to the screen for every second of it. I mean in a way that would've been enough, however I did get the investment as well, in part as I think the style is in itself enough, but also the crafted through line for Paul, which is how this script is structured. Really hope it does well enough to get that sequel.
Saving Chalamet, though I will say Villeneuve FAR more intelligently shot him in the action scenes than David Michod did in The King.
Ferguson - 4.5
Isaac - 4
Brolin - 3.5
Skarsgard - 3.5
Bautista - 3
Henderson - 3.5
Zendaya - 3
Dastmalchian - 3.5
Chen - 2.5
Duncan-Brewster - 3.5
Rampling - 3.5/4
Momoa - 4
Bardem - 3.5/4
Guessing Chalamet is a 5, and couldn't be happier given how many roles he gets.
8000's:
I think with White Heat is kind of interesting where Cagney was really known for playing the sympathetic hoods, and that strangely is still the case with Cody even though he is far more brutal and really plainly evil than his other gangsters. And Walsh you see cleverly subverts an expectation in making Cody almost an Anti-Hero at times in the Verna scene as you are with Cody actually in his cruelty in his interrogation, while also seeing her manipulation in their toxic relationship.
The same with the radio where you get such disdain all around their seeming "sweetness" that is anything but.
The scene that convinced unquestionably that Cagney had to be a five for the film, this as even as evil as he makes Cody, he manages to be genuinely heartbreaking in a way without sabotaging that evil. This in a way being all the crueler as he pours his heart out to another guy who really doesn't care about him either.
In a way the scene that shows the code in a film that really pushes at it throughout, this just how blunt Fallon is erases seemingly the potential sympathy, however I think it still works by showing are technical hero as indeed just working a job this whole time, while Cody the villain was putting his heart into every moment.
Anonymous:
1. "You Must Love Me"
2. "We May Never Love Like This Again"
3. "We Belong Together"
4. "It's Hard Out Here For A Pimp"
5. "Jai Ho"
6. "It Goes Like It Goes"
7. "For All We Know"
8. "My Heart Will Go On"
9. "It Might as Well Be Spring"
10. "Secret Love"
Ytrewq:
Ray (War of the Worlds)
Mark Baum
Michael Rezendes
Harry Lockhart
Joel (Eternal Sunshine)
Chas Tenenbaum
Thoughts on those songs as well as "The Morning After"?
I literally promised Timothee Chalamet I’d see Dune in theaters, so I’ll probably wait to see it until Tuesday when I can afford it.
Louis: Thoughts on Dune's cast and score?
Anonymous: The score might get nominated, so hold off on that, I think.
Liked Dune, but also kind of thought it was hilarious that Skarsgärd spent 9 hours in the makeup chair at a time for like 8 minutes of screentime.
RIP Halyna Hutchins. What a terrible tragedy.
The more I think about Dune the less I like it, so I guess I’ll have to wait and see what happens on rewatch. Probably doesn’t help that I’m a big Yueh fan.
Also count me in the minority but that score will be my least favourite winner in quite a long time if it ends up winning (I don’t think it will).
The Score might get nominated, but it definitely will not win.
Dune in the weeks since i saw it, i must say i didn't have to keep thinking about it afterwards, if you know what i mean. It kind of went in one ear, was fun there, went out the other.
My biggest problem with it is still how cold it is; mainly in that it seemed to want to focus mainly on the plot; but kind of forgot the emotional connection.
I mean take the Harkonnen Attack. Visually there are a lot of things that stayed in ym mind, but overall it doesn't really work that well.
In Helm's Deep, they added shots of the people of Rohan hiding in the caves, showing them, how scared they are, making the motivation for Theoden clear.
In Dune we just basically see tons of faceless people fighting. Not knowing most of them. Not knowing the place at all. And sadly not really caring that much about those we know.
Also it never really makes clear why Leto is becoming powerful; how exactly space travel, spice and everything around i works and why exactly spice is supposed to be so goddamn important; It doesn't even really make sure how important Water is to that world.
Either that movie was intended for those that are already fans, or just expects that everybody read the book
Tim:
Felt the emotional connection was through the characters we were with, the Duke, Duncan, Gurney and of course Paul and Lady Jessica during the attack. I don't think we needed random crowd shots to create investment there.
But we will have to agree to disagree on that point, but the movie literally states directly to the audience why spice is important.
Also it doesn't need to state why water is important, we ourselves know why water is important in a desert...the same reason why water is important in a desert on our world.
In a world where no vegetation can exist, where Water has to expensivrly be imported from other planets and where the book spoke about how important it is almost every other page, i say treating it like a deseert from our world is not really representing it well.
And on the Spice thing, correct me if I'm wrong - it's been a month - but don't they literally just say the spice is the most important thing in that world as it is important for space travel + that is is a psychotuc drug, but not how those things are related, how the calculus works etc.?
I just wonder what would happen if i asked somebody who has only seen that film about the lore of the story, how much they really understand completely, you know?
Tim: So basically you need every single detail explained for you constantly and in depth or the movie fails?
Tim:
Uh, but just like our world Tim, you need water to survive as a human, don't think the film needed to spell that out any more. Plus visually showed it was plenty desolate and hot. More exposition was NOT needed.
I mean the religious/drug spice is a good enough explanation on its own, space peyote, they could've drawn out the explanation on the navigation purpose, however I don't think such minutia was needed for the success of the film. Spending too much time on a McGuffin typically doesn't make films better.
Matt: No. I don't need the machine uprising backstory for example
but if you want to set up a world that is based on the importance of one specific thing, then sorry, make clear how that thing works! make clear why there can't be a substitute! make clear why it evokes people to kill thousands!
this is like the rebellion wanting R2-D2 "because he's important to them". That's it. Never finding out more.
*that the rebellion NEEDS R2
It's the empire that wants him, my mistake
Tim:
Again it says what the spice does and why it was important, just as it says the plans are to destroy the Death Star, Star Wars however doesn't go into detail why the exhaust port was specifically so poorly designed. Both hit the point, not sure how much more explanation we needed.
Louis: What is your current ranking for Denis Villeneuve's films?
Anonymous:
"You Must Love Me" - (Again I have nothing strictly against Webber like some do, however I just found this song to be dull and lifeless beyond belief. A ballad without inspiration or a hint of really any passion whatsoever in any aspect of itself.)
"We May Never Love Like This Again" - (Well to cover the Morning After, which was maybe patient Zero for this very studio mainstream 70's ballad, which actually when generic is a sound I kind of hate, as it just feels so produced and just like cloying its approach. Well this is the worst of the Oscar recognized as everything sounds like just some variation on other songs, including the Morning After, which I least has kind of a central melody that is memorable, and at least there is something comical involved with that one just by virtue of its overplay. This just is the b-side to that song.)
"We Belong Together" - (I'm not a fan of Randy Newman's Pixar efforts to begin with as so many of them sound exactly the same. This is perhaps the most extreme in that effort, as it just sounds like some left over and really discarded riffs from his better songs.)
"It's Hard Out Here For A Pimp" - (Rap isn't exactly my tempo to begin with, but that doesn't have anything to do with this song. I just found it actively grating both the repeated titular line and the actual rapping which I found uninspired.)
"Jai Ho" - (Really hate the instrumentation of this one that is actively grating. Otherwise this is far inferior to the other Bollywood with modernized songs that I have heard, this feels like an attempt to be special by being everything, and in turn is far too much.)
"It Goes Like It Goes" - (Again that particular style of ballad is decidedly not my thing, this being another example as it just seems to go from idea to idea without real natural rhythm and just built in with overdone lyrics.)
"For All We Know" - (I have to admit I don't really care for the Carpenters's song to begin with. This combined again with another generic sounding ballad that I actively find forgettable, and just don't care for. Also how the hell was "Let It Be" not nominated that year?)
"My Heart Will Go On" - (I'm with Kate Winslet, this song just hits some sort of anti-chord in me that causes me to wretch in its particular over the top maudlin approach, much like my feelings against the film I'll admit.)
"It Might as Well Be Spring" - (Rodgers and Hammerstein could write plenty of memorable songs, this one is not it, and feels just like a throwaway tune from them with no particular life of its own, and again like most of my bottom 10 it is just forgettable.)
"Secret Love" - (Forgettable ballad again, slow paced and just dull.)
Aidan:
1. Blade Runner 2049
2. Arrival
3. Sicario
4. Prisoners
5. Incendies
6. Maelstrom
7. Enemy
Won't rank Dune yet, intend to watch it again this weekend (to watch it again, but also to get Villeneuve a HBO Max view as well), though my feelings are that it would be in the "Arrival/Sicario" tier, doesn't touch Blade Runner, which is a flat out masterpiece in my mind.
Anonymous:
Ferguson - (In a way this sort of ideal casting where she delivers, and that's that, and that should not be at all diminished either. This as she brings the right sort of combination between this motherly love but also this kind of undercurrent of ferocious intensity that speaks towards both her protection towards her son and her personal measure. Throughout the film she is simply excellent in terms of bringing two things towards the film. One granting conviction and understanding within the exposition of her character, her order and Paul's potential, while also having excellent personal moments showing her real heartbreak when attached to the downfall of her family.)
Isaac - (With this and Scenes from a Marriage, Isaac could be on an upswing after all. Thought here he brought just the right tone for the Duke. This bringing just the kind of grace you'd want, but a quiet humor and charm to the part as well. Creating the right reasonable sense of the father, and the ruler as one. Crafting a sympathetic leader to be cared about, while also making the most of his latter scenes which I won't get into more at the moment.)
Brolin - (I mean more than anything I take from him as compared to Momoa as the two characters have a similar but not he same bent. Brolin in respond being effectively similar in his sort of personal bravado but with more a straight laced conviction and manner.)
Skarsgard - (Wouldn't have minded more of him, just because I was thoroughly enjoying the grotesque energy he was bringing here. In the same spirit as McMillan but while still doing his own thing in his portrayal as this kind of human slug in a way.)
Bautista - (It does seem like his scenes might've been deleted and if something was cut, I'd guess there might've been more of a prologue. Bautista though I still felt brought just the base animal his character should be.)
Henderson - (Fascinating casting choice and brings a nice sort of atypical energy for what is now a more expected advisor kind of role.)
Zendaya - (Obviously she will be far more focused upon the sequel, but thought she brought a fine ethereal quality to her scenes.)
Dastmalchian - (Brought the right off-beat intensity as the needed for the part where you get the sense of the calm intelligence, but also his own sort of lurid energy ideal for the Harkpnnen brain.)
Chang - (The weakest link, and while I will grant they could've given him more time, I also felt Chen just didn't really deliver enough of an impact with what he did have.)
Duncan-Brewster - (Felt she thrived here in giving this sort of spiritual exposition in a way. This in both bringing the right conviction towards these explanations but showing this specific personal history in connection with it.)
Rampling - (Like Ferguson ideally cast, however she does not disappoint in delivering on that promise. This being every bit of the cold witch you'd desire, and bringing such a power in her voice even beyond the literal power of the character in that regard.)
Momoa - (Every bit the swashbuckler you'd want him to be as Duncan. Brings the right spirited energy and passion to every moment he's onscreen, while also just being excellent in crafting a real chemistry with Chalamet that is rather endearing.)
Bardem - (The most I've liked him in some time, and the most I've felt he "popped" since his breakout supporting roles. Bardem here bringing that off-kilter energy to really the sand native for the lack of a better word, and delivering this fascinating and specific intensity. A kind of fascinating juxtaposition as he manages to be seeing low energy, however in that crafts such an energy befitting a man who has to choose all battles and all uses of his energy very carefully.)
Louis: Your thoughts on Scenes From A Marriage and the cast. And where would it rank in Isaac and Chastain's careers.
Luke:
Haven't finished it yet.
Sorry guys but Dune needed a quip every 3 minutes, bland cinematography and some sort of sky beam or big monster for the third act. Zero stars.
Louis: in defence of Chen, they probably cut his role down more than anyone in the film besides maybe Hawat/Henderson (who I agree did manage to do well with what little he had), I grant maybe he could’ve brought more to his final scenes but suddenly introducing that crucial plot element in his penultimate scene robs him of any chance to really go with it.
Louis: Is it alright to watch Dune if you've never read the novel/seen Lynch's version.
Louis: The interesting thing about that scene of Cody stopping Verna from escaping is that Mayo thought that Cagney was going to kill her there. Goes to show his ability as an actor, eh?
I've seen some people comparing Cagney's Cody Jarrett to Ledger's Joker. Thoughts on such comparisons?
Calvin:
That could be true, a la Sean Bean in Fellowship. And, hey I'm all for an extended edition.
Anonymous:
Well I would be interested to see if it is, so I would suggest going to see it. Honestly the reservations I've seen tend to be most frequently from those who a greater awareness of the novel/Lynch's film.
8000's:
Yes, and I would also say the comparison fits in they're similar unpredictability of performance. This as Cagney in a given scene can be friendly, menacing, completely psychotic, or actually entertaining with a degree of levity just like Ledger. The scene with Verna is a good example where we don't know what Cody is going down to do, because of Cagney's way with the part.
Louis: Your thoughts on the direction and screenplay of Sing Street? If it's too time-consuming, just thoughts on the direction would also be okay.
Sean: He was in Lead up until the point Louis actually reviewed him and realized he was supporting. He barely has 20 minutes of screen time.
Louis: Your thoughts on these casting choices that didn't happen.
Henry Fonda and Paulette Goddard as Robert Jordan and Maria
Jimmy Stewart as Sam the Lion
James Cagney as Judge Hoffman (Nicholas Ray thought of him for a recreation of the Chicago 7 trial in the 70's)
John Barrymore as Norman Maine
Robert Mitchum as Johnny Guitar
William Holden as Frankie Machine (The Man with the Golden Arm)
Laurence Olivier as Dr. Ernst Janning, Cyrano de Bergerac and Don Fabrizio Corbera
Anne Bancroft as Chris MacNeil and Nurse Ratched
Lee Remick as Marnie
Greta Garbo as Christine Mannion (Mourning Becomes Electra)
Michelle Pfeiffer as Lynn Bracken
Really enjoyed The French Dispatch, especially the final story, though I get why it's been divisive.
Murray: 3.5
Wilson: 3
Swinton: 2.5
del Toro: 4
Brody: 3.5
Seydoux: 3.5
McDormand: 3.5
Chalamet: 4
Khoudri: 3
Wright: 4.5
Amalric: 3
Park: 3.5
Schreiber: 3.5
Everyone else is pretty much a solid 3 or so
Louis: Have you seen A Quiet Place Part II.
I'm gonna need you to review Toby Huss in "Copshop." You're welcome in advance.
Louis: Your thoughts on Mob Psycho 100's first opening sequence?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bw-5Lka7gPE
Louis: If F. Murray Abraham had a more successful career post-Amadeus, which roles would he be perfect for.
Just saw the Uncharted trailer. I have always been a huge fan of the games, and to quote my favorite movie:
"Look how they massacred my boy."
Anonymous:
Carney's direction, despite his claims to the contrary, feels very much influenced by Alan Parker's The Commitments (I mean come on Parker, you got one of the key actresses from that film, and Gillen's dialogue seems ripped straight from Colm Meaney in that earlier film), which is the combination of kitchen sink and almost high fantasy between the realities of the film's world then the fun of the exploits of the musical realm. He finds a nice balance between the two here in particular, creating the right basis in the "real" scenes to craft a sense of place, against just having fun in the musical scenes, and in particular the major fantasy scene which is a great scene that where his direction manages to be fun while making something quite sad within that fun.
8000's:
Goddard again would've probably been too old, and definitely not a part that would've played to her strengths. I could see Fonda there, though I think he could go either way.
Stewart would've been great, one just needs to remember Anthony Mann Stewart and you can easily see him in the part. Johnson though was great so I'm glad he got that part.
Cagney could've been a great curmudgeon.
Barrymore basically played the part in Dinner At Eight, effectively so, so yes.
Mitchum I think would've been ideal bringing the same toughness but would've brought more of the off-beat charm that Hayden lacks.
Holden likely would've been better there as much as that film is frustrating on its own.
Olivier could do anything in my view, so yes to Janning, very much yes to Cyrano Fabrizio. Though I'm glad we got Lancaster for the first and the last, as his physical presence I think was really important in both parts, and Ferrer's voice was MADE for the Cyrano monologues.
Bancroft could do it all and I think she would've been great in both roles, though I think her performance would've been similar to Burstyn's and Fletcher's turn anyways.
Remick would've been superior I feel as Hedren was not a great actress by any measure and the parts with real nuance suffer due to that. I feel Remick would've gotten more out of those.
I mean Garbo would've been all the more ferocious and domineering I feel.
Pfeiffer would've been perfection, shame that one didn't happen, as she already has the vivaciousness however I think she would've brought WAY more in terms of the back and forth with both Crowe and Pearce.
Luke:
I mean I've had it on the que for some time at this point, but I just keep losing the motivation just before hitting play.
Marcus:
I like the style in terms of the use of color, as usual I have no idea what's going on, though intriguing, less crazy about the song that feels a little all over the place.
Luke:
Thomas Fowler
Colonel Behrani
Christof
Say which are the best 2021 so far:
- Picture: CODA
- Director: Julia Ducournau (Titane)
- Lead Actor: Nicolas Cage ((Pig)
- Lead Actress: Jodie Comer (The Last Duel)
- Supporting Actor: Tony Leung Chiu-wai (Shang-Chi)
- Supportig Actress: Ann Dowd (Mass)
- Original Screenplay: Nine Days
- Adapted Screenplay: CODA
Un rêve d’enfant est-il déjà devenu réalité ? Je doute. C'est comme dans les https://cinemay.tube/11509-les-inseparables-2023.html films.
Post a Comment