Sunday, 17 October 2021

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2000: Malcolm McDowell in Gangster No. 1

Malcolm McDowell did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying the old Gangster in Gangster No. 1.

Gangster No. 1 remains a bit of an underrated gangster film about the rise of an English gangster in the 60's. 
 
Okay, let's talk category confusion for a moment, this as Malcolm McDowell plays the titular gangster and the leading character, however he plays the character only in the film's brief introduction, slightly longer epilogue, and through narration. The character as a young man is portrayed by Paul Bettany for the vast majority of the film, this resulting in an odd spot as McDowell physically is barely in the film, but portraying the main character. I though can only defer though to the placement I typically give to the older man recounting his younger times, like The Green Mile, and Life of PI, where I deign the recantour as supporting. I will note though if only it were so simple however as McDowell feels far more dominant and important than those equivalents. Part of that is there is a bit more of him, but I also think a great deal of it has to do with McDowell and just the impact of his performance. Not sure I can exactly say for sure where McDowell should be, but for now I'll keep him supporting...for now.

Anyways, let's speak to McDowell's work here that opens the film with his introduction where we see his Gangster on the top of the world, living the good life, smoking cigars, watching boxing, peeing in champagne glasses, anything that anyone could ask for really. McDowell seems to be aware that this is one of his best roles since his breakout, and bites into the role with great aplomb. This right in the opening scene where he carries this magnificent swagger of a man on top, even in his dismissing of the bathroom attendant he acts as some kind of benevolent King commending his servant. This is instantly twisted when it seems he's about to drink his urine soaked champagne, though stops to directly address the audience and ask "What do you take me for, a cunt?" which McDowell delivers with a malevolent glee. From the start McDowell is both what you'd expect, but also delivering something you don't expect. There is something innately unpredictable right from the opening, who goes from one insane act, to really a different one, and we know that his gangster isn't exactly someone we should assume too much about. McDowell then technically takes the backseat to Bettany who leads much of the film as the younger gangster, who we see rise from hired henchmen to much much more. McDowell's presence never leaves however as he recounts the tale through his narration. This led already by McDowell's brilliant accent work here, this as this minor cockney variation that is both lurid and blunt in the best of ways. His delivery of the narration throughout though is remarkable because it is one of the most active narrations you'll hear, in that McDowell delivers not just as this recounting, but this emotional detailing so often the nature of his gangster. Bettany is often a man of few words in the flashbacks, and it is through the voice of McDowell we truly come to understand the gangster. 

McDowell's delivery has this innate viciousness and really unpleasant, in the best of ways, intimacy about it as he truly pulls you into this derangement. There are moments where he speaks just lovingly, even nostalgic for his early success or his commentary on his hatred of including women's one life as though he is imparting some kind of wisdom. There is far more though within McDowell's delivery though this in an early scene where the young gangster is eyeing his rival, McDowell insistence at "look at me" is of this violent predator, a searing not even hatred but rather this insatiable urge for violence. Other moments though are of the explanation of the method, including one specific slow speaking his past's way towards a slow and brutal murder of the leader of a rival gang. McDowell's speech you can almost seem to hear the spit as he names the room numbers, and the directions. McDowell speaking eloquently yet wholly in this rapture of a man reliving seemingly his greatest experience as a self-envisioned apex predator. McDowell speaks to far more than just words and puts us within the deranged mind of the gangster as he speaks. This isn't a recounting of the past, but truly the way he experienced it all within his specific set of reality. And in this McDowell shows what is essentially different between the gangster and his original boss Freddie Mays (David Thewlis), who seems like he could enjoy life within his success, as brutal as he could be, and would even allow him to love someone else. McDowell's narration though paints anything else other than killing towards success to be nonsense. 

Of course, as shown by the opening of the film, the young gangster finds his way to the boss's chair therefore, according to him, the top. A way entirely painted with blood. When finally there this is where we return to McDowell with the release of his old boss from jail, and we stay with McDowell in person for the last 20 minutes of the film. McDowell is wholly brilliant throughout this sequence as his performance is nothing of the expectation, and in a way is not the continuation of Bettany and that is the point. Now McDowell carries himself with the expected swagger now of the boss, he's still a leery gangster, wavering his gaze to look at beautiful, brutally talk to his underlings, there's a slight change in that now he's the guy seemingly in command, and now much older, however this isn't the point still. When McDowell is asking an underling whether he's killed a man, and whether he would kill a man, McDowell is amazing as on the surface seems still brutal gangster talk, however the minor pause in his manner, and the certain stress on the man's face notes a man contemplating the concept in a way he has not before and couldn't have as his younger self. Still McDowell as bluntly speaks towards the same underling "Who says I'm not going to?" when the man inquires why the gangster hasn't killed him yet, but there's more going on with him. We see even more this when he goes to see Freddie's old flame Karen (Saffron Burrows), who was nearly assassinated with Freddie. McDowell is amazing in the same in the playful approach as though he feels he can flirt with her like an old friend. When she treats him as the wretch he is, McDowell naturally falls to the inherent cruelty, however there is more that is so potent in his performance. When he mentions that he "deserves love" within his rage, McDowell is oddly kind of heartbreaking as you see in his eyes there's a real pain in there even as speaks so cruelly. Even more essential is perhaps meeting with Freddie again, who despite having lost his power and having been incarcerated for a crime the gangster committed, seems to be enjoying his life much more than the gangster seems to. McDowell is outstanding in the scene by internalizing such distress even as he postures his power and anger towards Freddie. McDowell's performance as he tries to essentially break down Freddie, it is with this potent desperation and anxiety. McDowell playing with this need for the other man to admit his failures, or else what exactly does the gangster have? When Freddie desires nothing from all the gangster's ill gotten gains, McDowell's reaction is incredible by his expression shows a man whose fashion of reality is breaking, and in turn he is falling into such dismay over the issue. This leaving nothing but threats and anger, however McDowell always shows the shy man within it all. When he recollects his old killings that gave him his power, McDowell speaks not with pride rather this sadness over the fact that it really gave him nothing in the end. McDowell creates this fantastic duplicity between the man's realization of the meaningless of his life and his attempts to create meaning just through the most superficial and violent "achievements". McDowell crafting from Bettany's performance, this man who reveals his internal monologue of his youthful tunnel vision, but in the end also this tragedy of what comes from such a life of violence. The greatest scene that exemplifies this, and the greatest scene of his performance being his final one where McDowell is screaming all to nothing in speaking of his greatness with all this bluster on the surface with his repeated "I'm number one" that McDowell speaks with rage, but more so of a man trying so hard to convince himself of his success. This until his final delivery of number one, where McDowell face so remarkably shows a man who at last has this realization and acceptance that his life has been meaningless.

40 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Happy that he got his 2nd five.

Louis: Any other rating changes.

And did you re-watch The Green Knight.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ignore the second comment.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Including this one, what have been some of the toughest "category confusion" examples that you've struggled in figuring out where a performance belongs?

(I.e. No Country for Old Men gentlemen, the quartet in Another Year, etc.)

Shaggy Rogers said...

So quickly. I thought McDowell would be the penultimate to be analyzed by Louis.

Anonymous said...

Shaggy: The penultimate review will probably be Considine.

Michael McCarthy said...

I guess I’m in the minority here as I’m perfectly comfortable putting McDowell in supporting. I’m honestly much more conflicted about Phoenix in The Yards as far as placement.

Bryan L. said...

The final scene is actually why I feel there’s a strong argument for him being Lead. My take on the film is that it’s about McDowells character reflecting on his gangster days while also coming to terms with the fact that his life has indeed been meaningless. There’s definitely a bit more “oomph” to the ending.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Lowered Marsan a bit because as much as I think he's excellent in his first major scene, I had forgotten how ridiculous his "old" voice is for his last scene.

Bryan:

Well No Country For Old Men trio (though Brolin's screentime dominant is greater than I thought), I'm actually kind of waiting on screentime central for Jim Caviezel in The Thin Red Line, Similarly to McDowell John Randolph in Seconds, Pulp Fiction story leads.

Conversely interestingly I've never had a second thought about some placements where I know more are conflicted like Peter Finch in Network or Brando in The Godfather.

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Again though I think about F. Murray Abraham in The Grand Budapest Hotel (who also bookends the film while narrating throughout), or Irrfan Khan in Life of PI, who I'd say we really don't give a second thought to putting in supporting despite having some key emotional moments of reflection, and also technically playing the or a main character. And yes, McDowell has *a little* more than them, but not much more actually.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Lucas: ratings and thoughts on the rest of the Gangster No. 1 cast?

Matthew Montada said...

Just got back from watching The Last Duel and I absolutely adored it!

Letterboxd Review: https://boxd.it/2dpNdr

Cast Ratings:
Matt Damon - 3/3.5
Adam Driver - 5
Jodie Comer - 5
Ben Affleck - 4.5/5
Harriet Walter - 4
Nathaniel Parker - 3
Alex Lawther - 3
Ċ½eljko Ivanek - 3

Matt Mustin said...

"McDowell's presence never leaves however as he recounts the tale through his narration." " Bettany is often a man of few words in the flashbacks, and it is through the voice of McDowell we truly come to understand the gangster."

That's why I think he's lead. The nature of the narration, and the fact that it's so constant puts us in McDowell's POV the entire time. Even when Bettany has thoughts, they're through McDowell's voice.

Anyway, regardless of category, it's a brilliant performance.

Emi Grant said...

Having just watched it, yeah, McDowell is straight-up terrific very second he's on screen and is a very easy 5. Hoping for him to keep his titular spot on the rankings.

I personally feel he's *just* leaning into supporting, given that in the end, Bettany still has approximately the better part of an hour of screen-time while McDowell has a little under 27/28 minutes at best.

Marcus said...

I don't understand how people can be conflicted about Finch's category placement when the movie explicitly says in the beginning and end that it's his story.

Matt Mustin said...

Marcus: With him it's entirely a screen time issue for people.

Tim said...

Marcus: well, yeah, it is his story, but that's not how it's delivered to us. It's his story, told mostly through the perspective of other people.

Mary Poppins for example is definitely Mr Banks' story; It is him who has to learn something, him who changes, and his arc being the point of the Film. But it is told from the perspective of the kids.

I'd say Network warks the same way

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Oswald Morris' work on Huston's Moulin Rouge and Moby Dick.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this mini documentary. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0hqnMUi3NA

Mitchell Murray said...

Question for everyone here: What would be some live action tv shows that are completely saved by their central performance?

I have an easy example - House. Even as medical procedurals go, it's consistently formulaic and unbelievable in some of it's scenes and plotlines. Nevertheless, Hugh Laurie is just so on point in the title role that I wish the show around him was equally engaging.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Mitchell: Bones. I wish Hollywood gave Emily Deschanel the amount of roles her sister has gotten.

8000S said...

Mitchell: Laurie is amazing in House. Really, really amazing.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on The Lost Daughter trailer.

RatedRStar said...

Mitchell: I would say Wallander with Kenneth Branagh, completely average acting and writing, typical by the numbers Scandinavian cinematography. Branagh pretty much carries the whole series.

Michael Patison said...

Robert: Totally agree. I really enjoy Bones, but the show sometimes says under the weight of it’s more poorly performed relationships. TJ Thyne and Michaela Conlin just are not up to it.

The show is saved by Deschanel’s multi-layered performance and her chemistry with Boreanaz, who I also love. John Francis Daley is also delightful.

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

I believe they have been covered previously.

Anonymous:

Interesting personal story on its own, though always interesting to see the dark side of things given the unfortunate path of Jake Lloyd who was the one who got the part anyways, and in turn inspirational in finding your own path despite a seeming set back.

Side note, insight on the actual auditions though, his take honestly was the best, though I think Lucas's whole approach was obviously the problem. One he probably should've had Anakin be older to begin with, but secondly his idea seemed to be "All American Boy", which disagreed with his own script as "slave kid". The part really should've been to someone with a more innate hardness quality to them, though again I think that would've been easier to maintain if he had skewed older from the outset, using the same actor for all three would've been the better choice.

8000:

I'd say in general Morris was better when he was working with black and white. I think these are two instances of ideas that don't fully cohere. This as there are strong elements in parts of the lighting some of the composition of shots in both. The realization of this within color cinematography though never quite coheres fully to create a truly dynamic film in either instance. With Moulin Rouge the colors occasionally overwhelm each other, and in Moby Dick, the style is never as penetrating as it could've been. Not that either film is poorly shot mind you.

Luke:

The trailer was a little weird with the musical shift half way through there, however Colman/Buckley you don't really need to say much more to me, more intrigued frankly for those performances overall, however the film seems intriguing on its own to be sure from this snippet.

Louis Morgan said...

So I don't typically update before supporting results, but just couldn't help it as I watched Jiang Wen's Devils on the Doorstep, which is incredible, and I can't believe his first two films are as obscure as they are. It is actually a rather apt companion piece with Joint Security Area, though with a bit larger scope.

Louis Morgan said...

Although apparently it's a 2001 film due to a Chinese ban.

Matt Mustin said...

Quick question, because I'm actually not sure, The Shining doesn't qualify as an Original Score, does it?

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

No, it's almost entirely repurposed classical pieces, including the main theme which is an arrangement of a traditional Dies Irae.

Matt Mustin said...

Watched The Changeling (1980). I've heard it called one of the greatest horror movies of all time. I certainly wouldn't go that far, but it's pretty spooky with some terrific atmosphere.

Scott-4.5

Devere-4(She's mostly just fine, and has good chemistry with Scott, but what boosts her rating is that she is TERRIFIC at being hysterically afraid.)

Douglas-3.5

Calvin Law said...

Louis: With the raves from both you and Omar, I definitely need to make this a priority.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Have you watched Nuremberg.

Shaggy Rogers said...

I finally got to watch No Time to Die. The film is good thanks to the competence of the Fukunaga direction and the technical aspects, the film only needed two things to become a masterpiece: a better story and a better villain. Craig's journey as Bond was truly a rollercoaster in every movie he walked through: high points (Casino Royale and Skyfall), low points (Quantum of Solace and Specter) and flat surface with NTTD.

Craig - 4.5
Seydoux - 3
Lynch - 3.5
Whishaw - 3.5
Harris - 2
Wright - 3
Waltz - 1
Fiennes - 3
Magnussen - 2.5
de Armas - 3.5
Malek - 2.5 (I confess that this character had everything to make us redeem for the actor after playing Freddie Mercury, what a mistake. Malek at the moment needs to work with some great director who makes a really good film and clearly extracts a great performance; I hope Malek will someday work with the Coen brothers, Safdie brothers, Darren Aronofsky or Paul Thomas Anderson (in fact they worked together on The Master, too bad the character was almost an extra).

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Being The Ricardos trailer.

Mitchell Murray said...

Shaggy: I'd hardly say Malek needs to be "redeemed" after playing Mercury; He did win an oscar for it, after all, and the vast majority of the film's problems weren't because of his performance.

I do agree, though, that Malek should find a quality project that really plays to his strengths. From what I've seen, he has too much of an interesting screen presence to be wasted or misused in lesser fare. I actually wouldn't mind seeing him in another video game, considering his memorable work from "Until Dawn".

Mitchell Murray said...

Side Note: Has anyone here played "Jedi: Fallen Order"?

I played the game with a friend not too long ago, and it's pretty solid. It has a lot of callbacks and references to other Star Wars media (it occurs after Order 66), but does stand apart with its own characters and fun game mechanics.

RatedRStar said...

Mitchell: Its pretty good, I wasn't expecting too much before it came out, then when it came out and got surprisingly great reviews I had to try it out, I really liked it, only thing I didn't like bizarrely was that I kept getting lost trying to find my way back to the ship on some of the planets.

Agree on Malek, he was pretty solid in Until Dawn.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Please do, and hope you get as much out of it as I did.

Luke:

I mean I did when it came out...

I see Sorkin is sticking to the HBO movie aesthetic...but looks like it could be fun. And honestly Sorkin can do some of his best work outside of politics, so hope he strikes a chord here.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Nuremberg and from what you can remember, what did you think of Baldwin, Cox, Plummer, Craven and Feore.

Louis Morgan said...

It's been 21 years...