Friday 27 August 2021

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1964: Shailen Mukherjee in Charulata

Shailen Mukherjee did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Bhupati Dutta in Charulata. 

Charulata follows the lonely wife of a newspaper editor as she bonds with her husband's visiting cousin. 

Shailen Mukherjee plays the traditional role of the "husband" though this role is considerably different than in most stories of this ilk, particularly due to Satyajit Ray's intimate understanding of human relations. In turn we get something quite a bit different, and fitting that Mukherjee's performance is far from the dispassionate fool and the jealous tyrant that is often the undesirable husband. Actually Mukherjee portrays really a great guy, but with an unfortunate bit of oversight on his part. The part on paper is similar to Karenin from Anna Karenina, at least the properly depicted ones, where the husband actually is a good man, and in part his goodness is part of what creates the situation involving his wife potentially looking elsewhere. The film opens with the wife, the titular Charulata (Madhabi Mukherjee) being lonely and bored in a house that can't quite suit her interests. We do see her interact with her husband, where the male Mukherjee really is nothing but a sweet husband. He greets her with a bright smile, and genuine sense of affection. There is though an essential kind of complacency in these interactions however where Mukherjee projects perhaps too much comfort in the relationship, as every moment has a sense of taking it all for granted. This is never in a cruel way, rather Mukherjee expresses sincerely a man who just believes his wife is happy, just as he is happy, and feels they can go on as they have been doing so. 

What disrupts this is the arrival of Bhupati's cousin Amal (Soumitra Chatterjee), who is interested in Bhupati's newspaper, that is devoted to democratic political movements. Bhupati supports both this interest, and actually providing his wife a companion to discuss her interests while he is taken away to the duties of his paper. Mukherjee's scenes are infrequent but important throughout the emotional "affair" had between Amal and Charulata. We have scenes of him running his newspaper where Mukherjee portrays a great enthusiasm and passion in his involvement with the development in the country. There is the kind of engagement we don't see in his wife, however what Mukherjee portrays is the type of passion that would denote a dogged newspaper hero if we only saw the scenes at the newspaper. We see him as this genuine crusader where Mukherjee delivers this innate sincere energy within his performance, as a man who is trying to truly help others best he can. This is further emphasized oddly enough in his scenes with Chatterjee. This as he encourages him to spend time with his wife, and encourages the man's own interests in general. Mukherjee doesn't portray a fool but rather the goodnatured state of the man. This as his delivery and manner is just dripping with enthusiasm for seeing his wife happy and cultivating the interests of his cousin. In these moments there are no doubts, because Mukherjee presents a man who would be incapable of seeing anything but the purest intentions in his family. This is shattered though when other members of his family steal from him, ruining his business and really his trust in humanity. Mukherjee has a heartbreaking moment with Chatterjee, this as Bhupati insists he's the only man he can trust, while Amal has finally caught on to Charulata's interest in him. Bhupati's delivery is still so sincere in his eyes presenting such familial affection, but not broken by that mistreatment he felt from others. This makes Mukherjee's delivery have this painful desperation of a man, who doesn't just believe in Amal, but essentially has to keep any faith in the world. Amal does this by leaving quickly and preventing any real affair from occurring, leaving the end of the film between the two Mukherjees. Mukherjee is incredibly moving in showing Bhupati moments with his wife, that are so sweet, such as when she suggests to write for his paper, and Bhupati's reaction is perfection. This as his reaction is true enthusiasm, but also this kind of surprise as though he's heard the greatest of ideas and can't believe he never thought of it before. They are also though very heartbreaking this as Bhupati finally catches onto what was going on between his wife and cousin. Mukherjee never has big reaction involving this. Rather it is in his quiet reflection of his wife's reaction to Amal's leaving, that you see such pointed heartbreak in the man's realization of what has happened. The final scenes then are heartbreaking in Mukherjee brings the man trying to be the best possible attentive husband he can be, while there is this quiet resignation that he'll never be good enough for his wife. Mukherjee finds this elegant and pained state of the man so clearly expressing his love, but being so petrified within his doubts all the same. This right to the final shot of the film, where Mukherjee is entirely silent, yet in terms of the married relationship nothing more needs to be said in conveying what the man is going through as he tries to reach out to his wife to truly connect with her. This is a wonderful performance by Shailen Mukherjee by creating the genuine tragedy in the causality from the central relationship of the film.

27 comments:

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Agreed 100% with this, truly heartbreaking work that I don't even think Tagore's original story would have allowed for. Ray truly was a master of adaptation.

Louis: Your thoughts on the swing scene from this film, and the following song? Both of those songs are just classic 'Robindro sangeet' that are particular favorites in my family.
https://youtu.be/MT-1ETlxJHM

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Also, slight change to predictions:

1. Plummer
2. Mukherjee
3. Cronyn
4. Tomlinson
5. Mason

Luke Higham said...

I'll wait for Michael before considering a change.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Might as well be time to right a previous wrong of mine, request wise:
I'd like to request Uttam Kumar's work in Nayak for a backlog review for 1966 Lead.

Tim said...

1) Plummer
2) Tomlinson
3) Muhkerjee
4) Cronyn
5) Mason

Luke Higham said...

Is anyone hoping to see Julie Andrews getting upgraded.

RatedRStar said...

1. Plummer
2. Mukherjee
3. Cronyn
4. Mason
5. Tomlinson

Michael McCarthy said...

I’ll take a stab at this despite not having seen a couple of these.

1. Christopher Plummer
2. Hume Cronyn
3. Shailen Mukherjee
4. David Tomlinson
5. James Mason

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your top 20 steven yeun and jk simmons acting moments

BRAZINTERMA said...

5º James Mason
4º Shailen Mukherjee
3º David Tomlinson
2º Hume Cronyn
1º Christopher Plummer

Robert MacFarlane said...

1. Tomlinson
2. Plummer
3. Cronyn
4. Mukherjee
5. Mason

Aidan Pittman said...

1. Plummer
2. Cronyn
3. Mukherjee
4. Tomlinson
5. Mason

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Are you ready to give thoughts on The Green Knight and the cast or do you need to watch it again first.

Stephen Patterson said...

1. Plummer
2. Cronyn
3. Tomlinson
4. Mukherjee
5. Mason

Matthew Montada said...

Hey guys. Anybody planning on watching the new Candyman this weekend? I hope to get catch it myself tomorrow. In the meantime, i’m going to watch the old one in preparation.

Mitchell Murray said...

Random note here, but after finishing the second (and sadly final) season of "Earth's Mightiest Heroes", I'd wholeheartedly call it a great show. At the risk of being a broken record, I'd highly reccomend it for those seeking a well done animated series, and a possible respite from the MCU.

Calvin Law said...

Matthew: I'm seeing it today or tomorrow depending.

Agreed entirely on this review Louis, he's devastating. And since I've watched/rewatched all of the lineup now, have to say I really did not care for The Fall of the Roman Empire but since Louis seemed to quite like it:

1. Plummer
2. Mukherjee
3. Cronyn
4. Tomlinson
5. Mason

Matt Mustin said...

1. Plummer
2. Mukherjee
3. Cronyn
4. Tomlinson
5. Mason

Calvin Law said...

Saw Candyman. It's good, not great - though it has some very impressive elements like the puppetry and some of the atmospheric bits - , don't think it tops the original for me though (which admittedly I quite like).

Abdul-Mateen II - 3.5
Parris - 3
Stewart-Jarrett - 2.5
Domingo - 4

Omar Franini said...

1. Plummer
2. Cronyn
3. Mukherjee
4. Tomlinson
5. Mason

Louis: if you have time, could you watch these movies:
-I Am Cuba
-Yearning
-Pale Flower
-Intentions of Murder
-The Soft Skin
-Before the Revolution

My request is Sergey Bondarchuk for Fate of a Man (1959)

8000S said...

Louis: Thoughts on this interview with Anthony Mann.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDrxEJgXCzI

I've seen some people referring to him as a stylistic descendant of Raoul Walsh. Also, thoughts on the missed opportunity of a collaboration between Mann and John Wayne.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your cast & director for an English-language version of The Perfect Dictatorship.

Marcus said...

Louis: Your cast and director for a biopic of the lives of Percy Bysshe and Mary Shelley?

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: what are your thoughts on Peter Jackson as a director, and your retro directing choices for him?

Bryan L. said...

Marcus: I’ve read that Elle Fanning was good as Mary Shelley. For Percy, Robert Pattinson, Nicholas Hoult, maybe Jack Lowden as well.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

I mean the secret to great direction in a way is in a scene such as this. I mean on paper so simple it would seem yet so much is conveyed within capturing the act of the swing so beautifully, again such a simple act, but the joy in Mukherjee's expression, with the fluidity of the movement creates so much more within that simple act.

I mean I guess I was just waiting for Ray to do the songs in a way, as I loved this scene, again love the naturalism of him just singing at the piano at first before technically becoming an overt musical number. Simple but beautifully and joyfully rendered. Again also works brilliantly as the most clear point of direct affection shown by him throughout the story, though guarded by doing via song.

Luke:

I'd rather give it a re-watch particularly for Vikander's performance.

Omar:

I'll try to get to those.

8000's:

Mann unsurprisingly speaks on film and his own work with a great intelligence. This in speaking both towards his understanding of the visual power in film, but also his speaking of his work in introducing the far greyer hero to the western. You can sense from the interview a real passion for film even in a low key way, and against testament to a great director is that kind of passion.

Bryan:

Governor: Russell Crowe
Congressman: Jared Harris
Producer: Miles Teller
Director: Chris Pine
Anchor: John Carroll Lynch

Louis Morgan said...

Marcus:

Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos (As the serious takes apparently have not worked.)

Lord Byron: Nicholas Hoult
Mary Shelley: Emma Stone
Percy Shelley: Jack Lowden

Lucas:

That's a real question there, as it is fair to say he has one of the most oddball filmography in a way that is a mix between Francis Ford Coppola and George Lucas. I mean he started with his personal schlock, which based on Braindead alone is actually rather entertaining in its schlockiness by going full force in Jackson's choices. Then Heavenly Creatures came that is *almost* an outlier. This as his visual choices, and use of VFX is still present though in a far more unlikely method, though effective in creating sort of the psychological madness of the central characters and thrusts of their passions which are visually realized, just as they are in the central performances. Jackson gives time to both with a deftness that you wouldn't expect from the guy who did the zombie baby. Then Frigtheners that is basically the budgeted version of his earlier work, and feels a bit like a studio job, though as studio jobs go his vision is still there. Jump though and you get one of the least likely jumps, well since George Lucas went from cars to Space ships I guess. Lord of the Rings other than some hints in sort of the ring influenced scenes, you'd never guess was the previous filmmaker. This though in service to crafting three brilliant fantasy epics, and really a singular piece. An amazing work though that works with character, visuals, aesthetic and scope. Jackson deserves credit in some how managing it, and in a way where like 95% of his choices, serviced to make all time great cinematic experiences out of a potentially unwieldy material. I'll say They Shall Grow Old is an outlier really so forgetting that, since then I think his work in a way has been a failure to capture the greatness of his two greatest achievements, which are so different on their own. King Kong, is a remake of King Kong, through the lens of LOTR, though I think far more successful than his return to LOTR with the Hobbit, where his direction felt perfunctory with the passion erased (which due to del Toro's drop out, sounds like he did entirely because he had to.). The Lovely Bones is basically a failed version of what Heavenly Creatures achieved, in merging fantasy or imagination with brutal truths and troubling emotions. There though I'll give him more credit and just say you can have an off day, or an off film, particularly with EXTREMELY difficult material like that film. So to summarize, I have no idea to say about Jackson, other than he was entertaining schlockmeister, a sensitive artist of tricky material and then a master epic and visual filmmaker, then he became a lesser version of those last two, maybe return to the schlockmeister? Or stick to the documentaries? I mean They Shall Not Grow Old was well done.

So retro directing (Heavenly Creatures/LOTR Jackson)

Carrie
Jason and Argonauts
Les Diaboliques