Tuesday 10 August 2021

Alternate Best Actor 1964: Eiji Okada in Woman in the Dunes

Eiji Okada did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Niki Junpei in Woman in the Dunes.
 
Woman in the Dunes is a masterful film about a school teacher becoming trapped in a dwelling at the bottom of a sand dune where a widow lives. 

I'll admit that brief description doesn't really do the film justice in terms of its overall achievement which is particularly mesmerizing in its idiosyncratic vision of director Hiroshi Teshigahara. A vision that was notably nominated for best director, which say what you want on the academy overall, they deserve some kudos for recognizing this achievement. Now is this a director's film, I would say so, it is hard not to, however the nature of the film I think in terms of what makes it truly great, rather than just great, is the human factor is ever prevalent. This is found within Eiji Okada's central performance as the school teacher Niki Junpei. This as we discover him participating in his hobby, alone, as he walks sand dunes in a secluded area looking for insects. Okada's performance here is one defined by a general affability and most of all curiosity in these moments. He evokes a man just enjoying his little hobby with an innate fascination for these creatures and his environment. There's a low key charm he brings to his performance befitting just a likable man. This effectively establishing then really are any man that his Junpei will be during the film as local villagers come upon him and advise he takes shelter at the bottom of a sand dune where a widow (Kyōko Kishida), who lost her family, lives. 

Okada's performance initially carries the same curiosity as he had before in this new situation. There is no alarm as he interacts with the woman rather Okada shows a genuine interest in this strange state of hers and just a general cordiality in his rather light delivery towards her. At this point Okada naturally creating what most viewers state would be in this situation and naturally crafts this surrogate within the experience. This being an essential element when Junpei discovers he cannot freely leave the dune on his own and discovers the widow, and now he, are essentially slaves to the local village who want sand harvesters. Okada's work then is terrific by the way that it completely allows us to be within this situation. A situation certainly symbolic in itself, however the film is great by working both in that sense while still being effectively literal as strange as the situation seems. Okada's work is fundamental in this as he always portrays a real person going through this struggle. Making initially for a kind of hero for us as we see in him the desperation in his attempts to escape and even the dogged sense of hope that sustains itself initially. He brings us so effectively into this mindset by so bluntly creating reality within the situation as the man tries to find a way out, but one way after another he finds himself back where he has started without gaining much of anything for it. 

His form of respite only coming in his interactions with the widow which is one of the most fascinating aspects of this film. This as Okada's and Kishida's chemistry really isn't anything normal as befitting of the situation. There is warmth certainly in there at times, but this is not a traditional romance, or even necessarily a romance at all. Their moments of intimacy, the most intimacy, have almost a functional even desperate quality about them. Their solace is together, but their solace isn't as two people in love, but rather two people finding comfort within a mutually dependent situation. Their interactions are with understanding but also that certain detachment. This as the woman is seemingly comfortable within the state, to the extent she can be, while Okada shows still that combination of overt frustration and a waning hope. This when he speaks towards surely people from his city will be looking for him, Okada's delivery is as a man who both believes it and doesn't believe at the same time. This as he hopes this will be the case but in his eyes there is the constant nagging sense that he is truly stuck within this situation despite his continued attempts. Eventually as more time goes by Okada's work naturally creates the sense of the frustrated resignation but also this strange calm. This as we have clashing moments. One of trying to appease his captors through some strange pornographic display, where he plays basically he male animal of a zoo. Okada successfully realizing this moment by playing it as base hunger as much as possible, not for the sex but rather the hope of getting to see the ocean again. This against as we see the man's attempt for escape by trapping a crow to use a messenger that essentially leads him to experiments and a hobby. Here that Okada portrays the most contentment of a man with a distraction in life that he is most comfortable with and in no way lacking with conflict. A man who has found his peace within the situation. In Okada's performance he so honestly portrays this as a state of life that it is actually rather disturbing because of how natural of a choice it seems. The strength of this work is that it keeps an essential anchor within the story. As much as the story means more than it appears, it also means what it shows, and the striking nature of that is found within Okada's performance. His performance that is a constant reality of a man in this seemingly unbelievable situation. The unbelievable situation becoming startlingly believable because Okada only presents us a real person going through all this, not just a symbol of one.   

48 comments:

Calvin Law said...

Okada being in this AND Hiroshima Mon Amour, what a fascinating achievement to be part of two New Wave masterpieces. And agreed, probably one of the most inspired nods ever by the director’s branch, who do indeed seem to be most frequent in making great decisions like this. Glad you loved it Louis.

Luke Higham said...

Ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast.

I'm so confident now in winning this contest.

Calvin Law said...

Hope Kishida is a 4.5 too.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Brilliant performance in a brilliant film, and I'm still torn between Teshigahara and Kubrick for my own Director win.

Louis: Thoughts on the direction and screenplay?

Anonymous said...

Louis: your director and cast for a 2000’s Green Knight?

Robert MacFarlane said...

I finally watched the original Dune all the way through instead of just bits and pieces over the years.

God that was fucking boring.

Anonymous said...

Louis, your top ten Signoret moments.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: what are your thoughts on the score of Foxcatcher?

Marcus said...

Louis: If you had never seen GOT, but was aware of the quality of its final season and ending, do you think you in 2021 would have given it a chance?

Matt Mustin said...

I watched The Lion in Winter and aside from a couple of minor flaws (and one huge one) I thought it was completely amazing.

O'Toole-5(He's so great here that I actually retroactively have more appreciation for what he did in Becket as well.)

Hepburn-5(Stunning. All-time great, actually.)

Hopkins-5

Dalton-4.5(One more scene and he probably could've been a 5 I think, he feels a *tiny* bit shortchanged.)

Castle-3

Terry-1(He was the major problem I mentioned. Distractingly bad, to an unfortunate degree.)


Calvin Law said...

Honestly Teshigahara is my win for the year and it's not even close, much as I love Strangelove and Kubrick's work there. I suspect the latter will remain Louis' win though, and deservedly so.

Matt: Hepburn (and O'Toole for the matter) is one of those performances that live up to the hype entirely.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

O'Toole's only second to Lancaster for me for The Lion in Winter, and Hepburn is definitely in my top ten female performances.

As for Becket, O'Toole is awesome there but I've come to find Richard Burton to be the MVP there.

Matt Mustin said...

Tahmeed: Oh me too, I much preferred Burton.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Kishida - 4.5(Her performance is a fascinating counterpart to Okada in that you are granted a different impression of someone having become of this state. This as her performance has this remarkable combination of both being content and discontented at the same time. Kishida shows there's something off in her state even as she speaks in general with this sense of this is simply what her life is. This though in creating the sense of almost an attempted dignity in turn seen most abundant in the attempted rape scene where she portrays effectively the refusal to bow to become fully just an animal within the views of their captors.)

Tahmeed:

Teshigahara's direction is amazing in creating one of the most lurid and tangible sense of place in any film. This sense of place though that is both mesmerizing but also horrifying all the same. Much has been said about the way he shoots the sand and it should be. There is the way he alone does that in creating it as this sort force or intimidating character all on its own. Almost portraying as kind of a supernatural force and how he achieves that is almost impossible to describe by how uniquely powerful it is. I think what is truly notable about his work though is his balance between the elements beyond that sense of place that is so striking on its own. Something that he amplifies through unsettling score that puts you in Junpei's mind, and the sound use. Even the way he depicts the villagers that are almost like demonic creatures in the terrifying prompted attempted rape scene and his initial attempt to climb up the rope ladder again. He balances this establishment of the mental state, that is so lurid and potent on its own, though I think with clarity in the moments between the man and the woman. His calm attention to these conversations and intimate moments are essential in keeping the right degree of reality even within the allegorical tale. With these Teshigahara creates the anchor in which to build his tapestry of isolation, desperation and I'd really say horror of the desert in a way that has never been replicated or realized such as this.

The screenplay I suppose shows a trust in Kōbō Abe for Teshigahara to properly adapt his novel through his direction. Abe wrote the screenplay and there isn't an attempt to represent the novels very important visual language, because that's obviously Teshigahara's job, instead he quite admirably takes his already potent story and brings the essentials within the progression of the story and moments of dialogue. I think there was potential pitfalls to not trust really the visual language of film, but that is never the case in as the film is written. It isn't a sparse screenplay, rather it intelligently keeps to the literal in terms of conversation and most of the depicted moments. It really is an example of restraint and leaving the showing to where it should be.

Anonymous:

The Green Knight 2000's:

Robert:

It sure is.

Anonymous:

1. Deception - Les Diaboliques
2. The Car - Room At the Top
3. Final reaction - Army of Shadows
4. Planning together - Les Diaboliques
5. Argument - Room at the Top
6. Goodbye - Ship of Fools
7. Planning - Army of Shadows
8. Plot thickens - Les Diaboliques
9. Finding the book - Ship of Fools
10. First meeting - Room at the Top

Lucas:

An effective score of largely ambient pieces that help to give an even greater sense of an unpleasant and disorienting even quality to the film. Again most pieces are that mixture of instruments meant really to avoid melody. Otherwise than a few pieces, particularly the main theme which is striking as this mix of a beauty and melancholy.

Marcus:

No. I have avoided other series "where the ending falls apart" and I bet with those series there's probably a potential dropping off point where there really isn't one for GOT. I don't think any other series was as about build up as that one, so for it to all fall apart makes it far more detrimental than any other series failing in the last act.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I respect your decision to give ratings whenever each year comes around. From the top ten Signoret moments that anonymous asked for, I'm glad that Signoret has 4 fives at this moment with Army Of Shadows above Ship Of Fools.

Your thoughts on Woman In The Dunes cinematography.

And what are your top ten Cate Blanchett performances.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: Could you possibly give Kwaidan a watch soon.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

The Green Knight 2000's directed by Tomas Alfredson:

Gawain: Ewan McGregor
Essel: Jennifer Ehle
The Lord: Liam Neeson
Mother: Charlotte Rampling
The King: Jeremy Irons
The Green Knight: Tom Noonan
Scavenger: Stephen Graham

8000S said...

Louis: I'm curious, were you surprised to find out that The Naked Spur was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay, even though it did deserve the nomination?

Also, I've read that aside from Mason, Lumet considered Laurence Olivier, Kirk Douglas, Paul Muni, and Burl Ives for the role of Sol Nazerman. Thoughts?

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I mean among a film of virtues Hiroshi Segawa's is perhaps its greatest. Two genius choices in the use of deep focus and the 1.33:1 ratio. Although not the same ratio, the same type of ratio in The Lighthouse with the emphasis is on the vertical rather the horizontal the creating this unique ability to create grand landscapes while still feeling isolating. This as the man never seems to be able to escape the space with the emptiness of the sides. This while giving such a deep and detailed view of the desert. Where the lighting they capture is both beautiful and alarming. Most of all though it is just how vivid every thing looks as captured within the frame. The composition of which is consistently stunning in just one striking image after another, in a film that really stands out on its own as a singular achievement in cinematography.

Blanchett:

1. I'm Not There
2. Blue Jasmine
3. Elizabeth
4. The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou
5. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
6. Veronica Guerin
7. Carol
8. Bandits
9. Cinderella
10. The Talented Mr. Ripley

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

No, because something that's not really talked about much is there was a period in the 50's and 60's where most A-list films were adapted from something, so the original screenplay lineup could be pretty wild.

I could see all of them working except Muni, which judging by the Last Angry Man was still stuck as an perpetual over-actor even at the end of his career.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

FYI, Kwaidan is Kobayashi's show through and through, I'd probably say Nakadai is the MVP in terms of the acting, but even his role is purposefully rather limited.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thanks, how much did you like it exactly.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I liked it, not among Kobayashi's best (which isn't saying much given how good his best is) but a nice show off of his visual and atmospheric skill as essentially the Japanese version of Tales from The Crypt. Although a little more deliberate than it needs to be, the technical elements alone make it worth watching.

Anonymous said...

I mean a lot of Breaking Bad fans can act the exact same way.

Every fandom has toxic people and it's best just to ignore them.

Anonymous said...

Also nobody is required to like Breaking Bad or any other media if they don't care for it. Everyone should just try to be respectful of other people's opinions.

Sean Ingram said...

Anonymous: Bro, I am not saying that the entirety of the fandom of The Sopranos is toxic. I am a huge fan as well. A good portion of the show's fandom is great but the other huge portion are some of the most toxic and just way too self entitled I have ever seen.... If you don't like Breaking Bad, it's absolutely fine but if you gotta shit on BB to prove that The Sopranos is superior and proceed to say how both TS and Sopranos are "WAY" better and how people who feel otherwise are completely wrong then that's honestly a douchebag move. Belittling BB fans for saying how they feel that Cranston's performance is the greatest in TV history is where I feel is crossing the limits... I got shat on so hard by The Sopranos' fan even though I was SO respectful and used the words "in my opinion" in every sentence I wrote, but NO, according to them I am just wrong and dumb!!

Emi Grant said...

I don't even know what sparked such conversation, but I'll add to Perfectionist's comment by saying I've had similar and equally unpleasant interactions with people from The Sopranos and Mad Men fandoms (mostly on the former, though).

Just average fandom stuff.

Sean Ingram said...

Emi: Basically, I asked Louis and others(in a now deleted comment here) about what they think of a good portion of The Sopranos' fandom on social media mostly youtube being just plain assholes to people who prefer BB and Cranston's portrayal as the best they have ever watched, just like I got heavily ridiculed on a youtube comment section for preferring Cranston's portrayal.... I then removed my comment here because I felt that I should chill, but on reloading the page I found out that Anonymous already replied to me, so I replied to him back, that's all. I am glad that you responded as well. An argument with a huge "The Sopranos" fan on Youtube today made me wanna share my frustration here.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I'd advise you guys to try to not take it to heart. Some people on YouTube are just plain assholes, and there's just no point arguing with them.

Glenn said...

Luke, your top 5 lead overall prediction.

Luke Higham said...

Glenn:

So close between the top 2.

1. Smoktunovsky
2. Attenborough
3. Ustinov
4. Pleasence
5. Urzi

Burton if upgraded has an outside chance to get in and mustn't rule out Quinn either.

Calvin Law said...

I can't imagine a world where Quinn doesn't stay in the top 5, I'll be honest.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

By the way, while Smoktunovsky deserves a review of his own, I'd love it if Louis did a dual review of Burton's Hamlet as well (as long as he is at least a 4.5)

Luke Higham said...

Tahmeed: I agree. Every Hamlet that is a 4.5 or higher needs to be examined in great detail.

8000S said...

Louis: Do you think Robinson would have gotten an Oscar nomination if Lumet had given the role of Nazerman? I wonder if he also considered him for the role.

Calvin Law said...

8000S: I think he would've, and would've probably been great too, though Steiger is hard to top in that role.

Tim said...

your modern day Cast and Director for The Fortune Cookie?

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Yes.

Tim:

The Fortune Cookie 2020's directed by The Coen Brothers:

Harry: Steven Yeun
Willie: Glenn Howerton
Boom Boom: Kelvin Harrison Jr.
Sandy: Samara Weaving
Chester: Jonah Hill
Professor Winterhalter: John Goodman

Emi Grant said...

Louis: Your thoughts on American Crime Story: Impeachment's trailer?

Also, do you plan on watching it?

Louis Morgan said...

Emi Grant:

Uhhh looks a touch heavy on the fake noses, and I'll admit I couldn't through the first episode of the second season. I really tend not to like Ryan Murphy's directing style but if Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski are back as the writing team I'll definitely give it a chance.

Matthew Montada said...

Hey guys. Anyone wanna planning on watching CODA this weekend? Just curious.

Razor said...

Matthew: That and maybe Beckett as well.

Calvin Law said...

Matthew: Just watched it and adored it so much. Should be a SAG ensemble shoo-in in an ideal world and whether he’s nominated or not, Troy Kotsur should get a review here.

Matthew Montada said...

Calvin: ratings for the cast?

Calvin Law said...

Matthew:

Jones - 5
Derbez - 3.5
Kotsur - 5
Walsh-Peelo - 3.5
Durant - 4
Matlin - 4.5

Louis Morgan said...

I'm decidedly less positive on CODA overall, I think there are some charming and moving elements, however (despite its Sundance premiere) thought it had a surprising studio style feel good tone to the whole thing. This with just a little more quirk then really needed and the story occasionally eeked a little towards unneeded melodrama, which by the way seems almost too close to Running on Empty at times. I'll admit I in particular clashed with one minor plot point that seems in clear violation of the Americans with Disability act, which just rang false and kind of illustrated the way the film occasionally was adding more than what was needed to create the stakes of the story. NOT that I hated it or anything, but I felt the genuine earnestness and heart that seemed behind the film occasionally clashed with the glossy sheen of it all.

8000S said...

More retro recasts.

The Prestige (1950s, directed by Michael Powell)

Robert Angier: Burt Lancaster
Alfred Borden: Richard Attenborough
John Cutter: Claude Rains
Olivia Wenscombe: Jean Simmons
Sarah Borden: Margaret Leighton
Nikola Tesla: Ronald Colman
Mr. Alley: Edmond O'Brien
Merrit: Edmund Gwenn

Memento (1960s, directed by Orson Welles)

Leonard Shelby: Paul Newman
Natalie: Eva Marie Saint
Teddy: Eli Wallach
Burt: Orson Welles
Sammy: Hume Cronyn
Mrs. Jankins: Jessica Tandy
Jimmy: Timothy Carey

The Departed (1970s, directed by Peter Yates)

Billy Costigan: Al Pacino
Colin Sullivan: Robert De Niro
Frank Costello: Sterling Hayden
Sergeant Dignam: Bruce Dern
Captain Queenan: Robert Mitchum
Arnold French: Robert Shaw
Madolyn Madden: Diane Keaton
Captain Ellerby: Hal Holbrook
Trooper Barrigan: Harrison Ford

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Any ratings and thoughts on the cast.