Austin Butler did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Feyd-Rautha in Dune Part II.
Austin Butler takes upon the role of Feyd-Rautha the psychotic and competent nephew of chief overt villain Baron Harkonnen (Stellan Skarsgård), a role famously played by Sting in the 84 film, which much derided overall though many still take pleasure to this day in his repeated use of “I WILL KILL HIM”, so there was a little bit of an expectation going in with this character as the chief rival to Paul Atriedes (Timothée Chalamet). Which fittingly cast fellow musician biopic actor in the role, and general up and comer in Austin Butler. I previously praised Butler for what he did in Elvis though I didn’t love the film overall, he was good and particularly had a very strong presence as a performer, something that even carried over to his otherwise severely underwritten role in The Bikeriders from 2024. And on the immediate surface, Butler offers the goods as Feyd-Rautha, right from the outset as Butler’s bald look is most striking and he adds on top of that another very daring vocal performance, this time going for a severe impression of Skarsgård just as he did for Elvis in Elvis. A great choice though as he just naturally fits right into the Harkonnen without seeming like an accent just for the sake of it, he really breathes life into the character through it. Amplifying the character all the more is the physical bravado he brings in every moment of his performance, as he very presents Feyd-Rautha who is someone who wants to present himself as the force of violence and destruction. Walking and just handling himself as a man who loves every bit of violence he sows. Something that Butler accentuates potently in each of his scenes, from the opening where he casually kills a few women to test out his knife, and before that even his speaking on what he could remove with such a frankly sexual overtone to every moment of Butler’s delivery of these descriptions. He makes Feyd-Rautha the proper villain in every sense, taking the moment of killing one of Paul’s allies with noting that the execution will be pleasure with such sincerity and perhaps more than a bit of physical arousal. Offering the ideal foe to Paul in the final fight, where I have particular affection for tossing Paul’s line back to him of “May thy knife chip and shatter” as though he is living his absolute best life before the fight.
All of that would make for a good version of the character alone, finding his own way to bring to life his sadism in a less over the top but still very blunt way akin to Sting’s however with more depth even within that. But there is more to this performance than just depicting his villainy, as good as Butler is at that. Rather Butler doesn’t make him pure evil, not that what he shows him to be good, but doesn’t make him a black hole. As there’s even some vulnerability that Butler shows quite effectively, from his anger when the Baron setup a situation where he could be killed where Butler brings real vulnerability behind that, or in that gladiatorial game beforehand where he almost gets killed, Butler’s fantastic in the moment where the man has the knife on him, and in Butler’s laughing about it, there’s genuine fear glimpsed in him before he turns it around at the last minute. But Butler goes further by going as far as he can in terms of the idea of honor within the character. Something Butler consistently emphasizes that grants more nuance to the character than just another evil man, even if he is that. As in that gladiator fight, when he kills the spy, or even his own reaction to the end of the final duel, each time Butler’s delivery is with absolutely utmost honesty in his respect. He genuinely cares about the idea of honor and his eyes of someone who sees value in a real opponent or fighter. I love particularly the moment where in the original film Feyd-Rautha pestered Paul over Chani calling her his pet which Sting delivered with an extra bit of psychotic hectoring. Butler handles differently and in an intriguing way as he makes the whole moment weirdly genuine when he asks “any special attention for the pet”? Butler presents it as Feyd-Rautha very odd being yet in his deranged mind respectful offer to his opponent. As much as the character is this force for evil, and Butler delivers on that impactfully each second he’s onscreen, Butler does find nuance within the evil, creating life within the role beyond the specifics of the character in this narrative.
32 comments:
Louis: Any upgrades.
Thoughts on Villeneuve's direction.
And the title says Alternate best actor instead of supporting.
And finally have my Original song lineup:
"Better The Devil" - Strange Darling
"Dying" - Dying
"Kiss the Sky" - The Wild Robot
"My Stranger" - Your Monster
"No Matter What I Do" - Strange Darling
Louis: I completely forgot to ask you this but what is your director top ten.
He's stuck with me a lot longer than I thought he would. Very clever choice to mimic Skarsgard (and a great imitation at that), but his physicality and added touches really cut a compelling villain.
I'll go ahead with my Supporting Actor ranking prediction
1. Pearce
2. Maclin
3. Pearson
4. Borisov
5. Strong
6. Washington
7. McBurney
8. Dafoe
9. Skarsgård
10. Rogowski
I thought Guy Pearce was great, but I am kind of hoping someone else takes it this year. Obviously my ideal choice is Denzel but I’d be more than happy with Maclin or Pearson.
Louis, thoughts on the Critics Choice Winners? That Anora win was totally unexpected. Has there ever been a film that has only won BP and nothing else at CC?
Luke:
Villeneuve is a natural continuation of his work on the first film though with an even wider scope and greater ambition. The scale of the work in terms of every aspect is so remarkable and captivating in terms of the detail he gives the world both in creating the houses, the world and so forth, and the very tangible sense of place in the desert or the black sunned world of Geidi Prime. His work is an achievement just in the vision but there are moments that are particularly stand out in just great filmmaking, such as the attack on the Harkonnen spice craft, both duel scenes along with again the whole presentation of Feyd-Rautha’s birthday, and especially the first worm ride of Paul which is done just as one of the great purely cinematic scenes. While also telling an overall story rather captivatingly is both a realization and subversion. As you see the moments of grandiose splendor of romance purely but Villeneuve slowly subverts that in the specific religious fervor he develops that gradually becomes less inspiring and more disturbing at a certain point. The one aspect I think is imperfect is the pacing of the last act does feel rushed and there is the hanging question of Villeneuve’s choice, that carried from the last film, to focus less on the political and plot elements, though I would say this lessened a bit here, it was still present in the cutting out of Tim Blake Nelson and Stephen McKinley Henderson which shows it to be very much directing not a screenplay choice. And while what we got is terrific, I do wonder if filling out the story that much more could’ve made it a full on masterpiece which I don’t quite consider this film or this duology to be.
Let me hold on until I see I’m Still Here, which should be soon.
J96:
I genuinely don't care about critics choice and don't think they influence anything in terms of the actual race.
Louis: What is your 6-10 for Original Song if you have one? And what are your thoughts on the rest of the cast of Dune: Part II?
Louis: With both Succession and The Apprentice under his belt, is Jeremy Strong a great actor in your view.
Louis: Your retro directorial choices for Jacques Audiard? Seems like he's drawn to protagonists who are on the border of the criminal world (either trying to get out or entering it.) Emilia Perez was just a terrible example of that.
Bryan: Well, On the Waterfront then, right?
Matt: That'd be a good shout, I think. France-set with Matthias Schoenaerts in that case.
The next review will be delayed till tomorrow for various reasons but included in those reasons I was able to see I'm Still Here.
The Oscars may potentially commit their most egregious error ever in voting if this film loses to a film that I will not sully this review by mentioning here, not just in terms of the quality of filmmaking but also the intention of it, as here’s a film that genuinely cares about people having lost loved ones to the heinous acts of humanity, and isn’t just using it to falsely score phony points of importance. Anyway, let’s forget that potential future horror, and just celebrate the greatness of this film. I was taken aback by just how powerful of a work this slowly became to me in the way it unravels so captivatingly. Walter Salles slowly weaves us into the world of this single family in Brazil so brilliantly, by giving us those edges of the dictatorship around the scenes, of just family life, that is filled with so much character, joy and depth, that went that reality fully storms into it, we feel that impact like few films can deliver on because we feel like we're part of this family. And what Salles does, particularly via the extraordinary work of Fernanda Torres, is makes you feel every aspect of the weight of this crime, because we’ve lived with this family, we know them, and it is truly haunting what we see ripped from them. And while there were many ways to explore this specific story, I loved Salles’s choice here to keep it so intimately within the life of the family with such powerful moments that feel so raw, so tangible and just so incredibly moving in making the human connection to history. I loved every second of this film, and walking out, that special feeling crept up on me, where I knew this was an experience that was going to stay with me in the way only great films do.
Torres - 5
Montenegro - 4
Mello - 4.5
The family members (except the additional ones in the epilogue) - 4
Was not expecting I'm Still Here to be your new Best Picture win. Holy shit.
Louis, your ranking of the 20 nominated performances this year?
Hot damn, we share a #1! When was the last time that happened, Fury Road?
I’m Still Here may or may not be my favorite of the best picture nominees this year, but I would absolutely say it’s the one we need most right now.
Wow.
Thoughts on the cast?
Nice review. Now that you have seen Torres, how would you rank her among this year’s Best Actress Nominees?
Louis: You can hold off on Torres if you feel you have enough on your plate right now with the Dune II cast.
Hooooly shit.
I postponed an I'm Still Here/Brutalist double feature for tomorrow. Looks like I'm in for a transcendental experience.
I guess that easily settles the question of who Louis's Best Actress choice will be.
Sean Baker wins DGA.
And Anora wins PGA, this changes a lot. Glad that this crystallizes the fact that Emilia Perez won't win Picture at the very least.
To quote Gascon, light always triumphs over darkness.
Greatly relieved.
They were pretty close in throwing their whole reputation down the toilet.
*blasts Greatest Day by Take That* You take your wins where you can get them this awards season.
Those Anora/Baker wins, YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Lucas:
I'm good with those five when comes to song.
Zendaya - (Her performance is of course the major change of the entire adaptation and the position of Chani from love interest to being the one most disturbed by Paul's actions. And Zendaya excels here on both fronts, in not over playing the tough Fremen element, rather just bringing a convincing ease particularly in letting down the guard just enough to believably play the over romantic moments she does share with Chalamet. By very much showing it quietly in the middle of survival. Then progressing effectively to the shift in her performance in the slowly growing discontent that gradually progresses in each scenes. Something that she brings nuance and a tremendous weight to by bringing within it first quiet concern, that slowly amplifies to genuine horror, then overt sense of personal disgust and betrayal by the end of the film.)
Ferguson - (Effective reprise that is smaller scale in some ways, and we get largely that shift from the concerned mother to this incisive harbinger of Paul, however with sinister overtones that she manages to not position quite effectively as this fixation on the purpose less than some sort of brandishing the evil that will be unleashed.)
Brolin - (Good reprise like how he brings very much a direct earthy honesty towards the old Paul in a way contrasting everyone else who starts treating him as the overt savior.)
Pugh - (Honestly a pretty dull role when you break it down as mostly she is just delivering a lot of exposition and reacting to things, which I think she does entirely fine with but doesn't manage to elevate all that much off the limits of the page.)
Bautista - (In getting to do slightly more than just playing the over thug, plays the moments of the overt pathetic fear fairly well.)
Walken - (I think miscast for a director like Villeneuve who wasn't going to push him to go flamboyant, as really why cast Walken as the Emperor of the Universe just to make him a pretty dull politician? In turn Walken seems adrift much of the time, except his one scene with Paul where you see the potential of a far better performance, but the rest of the time you ponder how this guy ever got in charge to begin with.)
Seydoux - (Fine essentially seductress angle, very much within her type but it works.)
Skarsgard & Rampling - (Both don't get to do much new but are good in bringing what they brought in the first film.)
Bardem - (Brolin throws a lot of essential levity within the film by managing to both entirely sell Stilgar's overt religious fervor however to subvert it just enough to make it comedic at the same time, particularly his blind yet fervent delivery of how his messiah would claim naturally not be him. While also just having some naturally fun moments such as describing the dangers of the desert to Paul where he brings a great comedic ease that is particularly needed for the overall rather serious approach of the film.)
Bryan:
The Room
Son of The Mask
The Garbage Pail Kids Movie
I will not give any non-demeaning answers regarding Audiard until this awards season is over.
Anonymous:
I think he's very talented actor with the potential for greatness who has finally begun to funnel that talent in the right direction. But he'll need to prove some greater consistency going forward for me to call him a great actor fully, as even Armageddon Time was half/half for him, and just a few years ago he had The Gentlemen, so he's in the right direction now, hopefully he keeps to it then I would use that term.
Tahmeed:
Bit surprised myself.
Robert:
I believe so.
Anonymous:
Ask again in the alternate lead results.
J96:
1. Torres
2. Madison
3. Moore
4. Erivo
5. Gascon
Speaking of Bikeriders, thoughts on Jodie Comer? I know people loved her but she was just too broad for me. I know the accent is accurate but I meant her mannerisms and body language were just too hammy.
Post a Comment