Josh O’Connor and Mike Faist did not receive Oscar nominations for portraying Patrick Zweig and Art Donaldson respectively in Challengers.
The film itself is shuffled timewise between different phases in the lives and the relationship of the three central characters, however for the review I think it would be easiest to examine the progression of O’Connor and Faist’s performances in chronological order. As one of the successes of both performances is creating the different ages of the character, as while obviously neither O’Connor nor Faist look like teenagers they do much to create the vibe of them when we see them as a formidable doubles team. Each just has a lack of weight in their performance, the lack of weight being the lack of life experience in both of them. There’s an ease about them and really even the hope of youth in their relaxed physical manner and their faces that just have no harshness in them. Although there is some hairstyling involved, perhaps some makeup but mostly it is just the vibe where the two excel in that state of two young guys, more so high schoolers than anything else. A sequence where the two also lay some essential groundwork in their tennis playing each portray the simple joy of performance between the two as you see that both Patrick and Art love playing together. They are truly a team in the sequence as performers as well as they both exude that same energy as one. Something that continues as we see the two together as a pair, where the chemistry between them is quite fantastic. As the two have a warmth in their banter, even when they are purposefully pestering each other a bit, Faist and O’Connor trade them off as proper buddies. Although I think essentially you get the dominant, or the less negative way of saying it, the older brother vibe that O’Connor brings in a greater innate confidence about himself over Faist who plays it all a bit smaller and purposefully the meeker of the two who looks upon Patrick with the sense of always never quite being what he is.
Unfortunately for the pair’s relationship Patrick decides to take Art to see upcoming tennis superstar Tashi Duncan (Zendaya) at a game. A game where O’Connor and Faist’s reaction is that of instant and overwhelming combination of awe and arousal as each man is smitten by her very being. This leads both to go to a party to try to hook up with Tashi. Something where O’Connor and Faist both excel in filling different roles within the scheme of the attempted relationship with Tashi. The consistency within the scenes is the mutual obsession in each of their eyes once they strike up a conversation with her and the various, at first friendly, little barbs against each other where the delivery of them by Faist and O’Connor have that swiftness of true teenager boys having a certain kind of measuring contest, that may be in all good fun…or perhaps not. Within their methods to woo Tashi though each presents themselves a bit differently, as O’Connor brings out what will be something that is consistent in his performance and I love the way that O’Connor utilizes this choice as a weapon utilized both by his performance and actually by Patrick as a purposeful choice. With Patrick there is this side grin, that O’Connor makes the choice to purposefully present only a certain moment of Patrick trying to project his strongest confidence and put forth his best charm offensive. Something we see along, with his rapid fire delivery of someone finding any kind of way to hit on something within Tashi to make her interested in him. Which for her is tennis, where you see actually the greatest fixation in Tashi. Faist on the other hand wisely isn’t competing with O’Connor on that front of the scene, instead actually becomes more insular at times, but rather shows Art’s method as attempting to make a single important strike to get her attention. As with Art’s pivotal lines, that is where Faist puts the most confidence, as he works up to try to make his impact where he can, while often looking off in slight frustration at the ease O’Connor brings with Patrick.
The two have pseudo success early on as Tashi invites the two into a makeout threeway, however she eventually moves them into making out with each other much to Luca Guadagnino’s…I mean Tashi’s delight. Which speaks much to the relationship between the two guys which definitely goes into a sexual relationship in addition to their friendship even if both men wouldn’t immediately admit to such things. However what it really is, is the start of manipulation of Tashi of the men as she makes her number the prize of a championship game, that previously Patrick admitted he’d throw for Art, but now it becomes personal. Within the game you see the first break as O’Connor now goes all in with the confidence bringing a bravado with every moment of his play and even being very close to mocking in his overly satisfied reaction to Art’s losses. Where Faist counters that effectively by showing Art becoming more serious, tighter in his manner, more determined in a way but also now weighed with jealousy for Patrick’s success. Something that is only exacerbated when Patrick not only gets the number he indicates by Art’s own serve style that he successfully had sex with her as well. Something where you see the ego of Patrick grow, meanwhile the frustration of Faist’s performance only becomes all the more internalized and intense. Something that continues as we get our first time jump to Art and Tashi at Stanford, meanwhile Patrick has gone pro not to exactly the greatest of successes.
Through the scene we get our first age up where Faist loses that youthful energy being that much more serious, meanwhile O’Connor’s confidence now has more of a put-on. It isn’t as though he’s truly not confident but you see the guy having to purposefully put it on a bit more. From that though we more so see the progression of the relationship with Tahsi with each. The first where Art not so subtly tries to put some doubts into Tashi’s mind, where throughout the scene Faist’s chemistry with Zendaya is one of constant doubt, quiet frustration and just a fixation on the need behind her. This contrasts with O’Connor where at first you see the two getting on quite well, sexually as they chat up tennis and we see Tahsi turned on by that and O’Connor shows Patrick very much turned on by Tashi. Unfortunately Patrick tires of her fixation on only tennis to which she in turn denies him sex. O’Connor’s great in the way he presents Patrick’s specific lack of BS when it comes to Tashi’s manipulation around tennis. O’Connor while still presenting his own fixation by sexual need overtly, combined with this very blunt disinterest with her overt machinizations and obvious disinterest with him outside of being a tennis player. O’Connor though not making it quite so simple putting in part an attack against Tashi when he calls himself her peer, but within the bluntness of his delivery we see the emotional vulnerability just beneath it of the pain he does feel connected to her seeming dispassion for Patrick if he’s not a tennis player.
Shortly after their fight however Tashi has a career running injury, that in turn also leads to the rejection of Patrick by both Tashi and Art. Leading her to Art, where Faist is great in the way he constructs Art’s, well, constructed confidence. It isn’t real confidence as he chats up Tashi later to join his team as a coach, and really more so to get a bead on starting a relationship with her. What Faist does is craft the attempted confidence of indifference, something he presents with a callous stare and speaking about tennis as though it is nothing to him in a certain sense, though it obviously is much. Faist pointedly undercuts this however when it turns romantic such as stating his desire to kiss her with so little confidence and just the most desperate sense of an ask with a self-defeating attitude. Faist showing so much still Art’s fixation on her as this unobtainable goddess in a way to the point that even when he does obtain her it in no way builds genuine confidence. Something quite obvious in our briefest time jump where we see Patrick approach an engaged Tashi and hookup with her. I think the thin nature of the scene is really key particularly in O’Connor’s performance. O’Connor doesn’t present as genuinely desperate love or anything of the ilk, rather is just direct with almost a non-verbal of saying “I’m hot you’re hot, let’s have sex” with once again his weaponized grin to help sell it all. Contrasting that with Art who catches a glimpse of the situation, where Art is becoming a tennis champion at the same time, and Faist is great in playing the posture now of the star athlete in his general demeanor walking around but when looking at that we see the same guy desperately trying to insert himself into the conversation with Tashi and Patrick.
After this we get the most substantial time jump where Art is the very successful, though pivotally not legendary, tennis player who is married to Tashi, have a child and even essentially an industry behind them as a team. Faist in these scenes shows that complete transition and it is remarkable how he can go from the up and comer star, to now the spent star who is past his prime. Faist does so through the sort of seriousness of his intensity in these scenes portraying the man dogged by his success in a way and just constantly has this weight about him. What doesn’t help matters is his relationship with Tashi has not changed as she truly controls the pair despite not being the tennis star, and even now that he’s married to her with a child he’s still not equal to her. Faist still showing the same fixation though now with I think a greater sadness about it because there’s a hopelessness about it, such as his delivery of “I love you” to Tashi, followed by frankly a dismissive “I know”. His “I love you” being so filled with years of frustration, years of being in love, but not truly being love himself. Faist playing so well this duality of a desperate state despite also having that intensity of the successful man. Speaking of desperate states, we find Patrick as a starving fringe tennis player, who can’t even afford his hotel room. O’Connor is absolutely amazing in this phase of playing Patrick, because he’s downright hilarious yet he’s still in character. Because what O’Connor does is still have that same confidence but now he doesn’t quite have all what he needs to fully back it up. I love the moment where he tries his classic grin on the hotel manager, where you can see the attempt but now it comes off as a bit sleazy and desperate despite not exactly being all that different from when it was successful. O’Connor playing so well into this juxtaposition of confidence now is his only thing he can hold onto to hide his desperation. As we see when talking to an official and his eyes just focus on her breakfast sandwich, and for the moment O’Connor just shows a very hungry man and really the very pathetic state of Patrick at this time. Or even when he hookups with a woman solely to get a bed to sleep in due to his lack of funds, where O’Connor is comic gold in just how he puts on the barest interest, and particularly his perfect quick reaction of “screw it” by dropping all pretense and just starting to make out with her to get to his end goal.
The central element of this final time period though is a tennis tournament which is a tune up for Art, a last ditch effort for Patrick, and naturally the two come face to face for the victory. Where the battle between them is obviously about far more than just the game or even what the game means for their career. Leading up to it we get two pivotal scenes, one being the only major scene between Patrick and Art since the end of their friendship where they share a sauna much to Art’s dismay. It’s an amazing scene in terms of the performances of both. Because on the surface you have each playing a part at first, where Faist is projecting callous confidence, a disregard for Patrick as though he is the great man and Patrick is just some random sleazebag. Contrasting that O’Connor is great in bringing the lack of shame possible for a man with nothing to lose coming in with his hectoring attitude and manner of trying to impose his will against Art best he can. Eventually within the argument though there’s a fantastic moment where you see the “act” in O’Connor let up as he gets to something deeper in his eyes and genuinely delivers Patrick’s almost apology by saying he liked playing with him. Something where Faist shows Art almost stiffen all the more to try to hold firm to his earned confidence of his career and bring too much admance to his sneer of any meaning to their old days. We also get Patrick and Tashi essentially opening up negotiations with each other, as Patrick tries to present himself as a prospect both as a tennis player and as a lover basically. Something where again O’Connor’s remarkable by as much as he brings that confidence it is the confidence of a man who is in dead end and as much as he pushes there’s always the nagging sense in his eyes of not nearly being as great as he wishes he was. What Patrick does have though is Tashi’s number metaphorically, where O’Connor plays the straightest moments in Patrick in stating his disgust with her in a way, while at the same time showing his obvious lust for her in almost the same breath in seeing her as the sexy manipulator essentially. Where O’Connor’s performance captures a specific knowing where he has the directness of the truth, but also the certain resignation that he’ll give into her anyways since he can’t rid himself of his attraction to her. All of it culminating in the final game, where each present their own forms of lying to themselves, where O’Connor brings that pestering attitude, mixed in with moments of vicious frustration, and Faist matches that with that “Above it all” attitude of the great athlete mixed in with his own vicious frustration where the simple truth is neither guy is having any fun. That is until Patrick secretly reveals his affair with Tashi, and in turn her active manipulations of both, and we get the final play between the two in the tiebreaker for the match. It has be said the sequence is oustanding, the best in the film, one of the best of 2024 and Faist and O'Connor are pivotal. Becuase as much as it is a lot editing, score, and specific directorial choices by Guadagnino, their work is essential in creating the gradual loss of the frustrations of each men, to slowly building up joy as they play, to finding the sense of friendship again, to building together this moment of pure jubiliation as they embrace each other. The scene would not work if Faist and O'Connor did not make you believe the silent connection that is reformed through the game, which they absolutely do and make the film end on such a unbelievable high. Both performance are pivotal however throughout the film, as each successfully creates such a tangible personal journey that amplfy the other's by the contrast that they create in those journeys and natures of the two men, with the consistency being the obvious talent of both actors.
22 comments:
Louis: What's your rating now for Zendaya.
They're both fantastic. I lean slightly towards Faist because of his incredible phsyicality and also how heartbreaking he ended up being (and his slightly embarrassed look after O'Connor just blurts out who finished first when they masturbated together is one of my favourite small reactions in the film) but they are both excellent.
I've been waiting to ask this all year. Thoughts on the score?
Louis: Thoughts on the direction and screenplay, delighted you gave them both 5's.
Along with Murphy and Stan, I think we’ll be getting 10 5’s.
Prediction for the final top 10:
1. Brody
2. Stan (A Different Man)
3. Murphy
4. Hoult
5. Domingo
6. O’Connor
7. Faist
8. Stan (Apprentice)
9. Chalamet
10. MacKay
Louis: What are your thoughts on Zendaya in the film?
Interesting thing I've noticed on rewatches is the little reactions that O'Connor gives to indicate Patrick being more keen to be open about his attraction to Art whereas the latter is more closed off about it. Great performances by the two of them, I would basically say they're on an even keel for me.
Louis: Could you also add Franz Rogowski in Great Freedom to the winning requests page, Calvin picked him.
Anonymous: Tell us your final predictions for lead and supporting actress.
Fernanda Torres and Felicity Jones are winning.
I thought Trine Dyrholm would win.
Shaggy: I thought so too but comparing Louis' thoughts on each, he's clearly more enthusiastic about Jones.
Louis: Who would you say are the five best late bloomers of all-time. E.g. Mark Rylance and Christoph Waltz
Anonymous: I didn't write it right. Tell me your TOP 10 lead and supporting actresses.
Louis: Do you think Brody and Madison might win SAG?
Luke:
4.5 still.
Matt:
One of those scores that it is impossible to separate from the film and so much so crafts so much of the energy within the score. That is the purposeful forward uptempo momentum where syncopation is the standard even with the less intense pieces from the score. Where there is a purposeful creation of the electronic score to craft basically the momentum of a proper volley within the precise instrumentation that is very much its own combo even within the oeuvre of Reznor/Ross scores. And there is actually a surprising range from the pieces of say “Lullaby” to of course “Match Point”. And one has to talk about match point to talk about the score, where there is just so much intensity into every aspect of it, with the backing of the beats that indeed sound like tennis balls bouncing, that just building magnificently with the various slightly disparate elements, building to a peak, then somehow building to even more by adding more, without ever becoming too much, adding to the overall tense yet exhilarating nature of the score. It is an amazing score and perhaps the most egregious snub.
Tahmeed:
Much to my own surprise Guadagnino’s work absolutely worked for me, and I’ll say even though Queer didn’t work for me on the whole the directorial verve of the piece was still often impressive. And quick note, I did watch it again, and my feelings haven’t changed that one’s just not for me. Challengers though absolutely is where Guadagnino goes all in to make tennis both cinematic and highly sexualized. Succeeding in both in his purposeful accentuation on the sweat, the muscle changes, the breaths, but also on the intensity of even the crowd viewing it. And I will say one of the great costume choices of the year is without a doubt Tashi’s ominous sunglasses in the final match. And as much as he invigorates tennis onscreen in a way it certainly never was elsewhere, he also does so in his positioning and approach, of the game and the sexual charge of his three players on and off screen. Backing up by his utilization of the Reznor/Ross score and the punctuation of the editing. But I think he nicely does balance his hand with his overt scenes by giving those moments with his actors, though he will occasionally push them all extra close to emphasize the intimacy of the triangle, but it creates a nice balance. My only critique on his end would be his VFX of the storm which is less than perfect, but it’s something I can overlook given how much he does with this film.
Well John Magaro from Past Lives’s screenplay I think is pretty terrific, particularly in terms of the daring nature of the piece by going through different time periods, making three not particularly likable protagonists without aggressive moralizing, and very much going abroad with Tennis relating to sex however in a way that is balance nicely. I think Kuritzkes puts enough cheeky lines and overt sexuality in there that brings the right sense of humor to the potentially ridiculous idea, while doesn’t overcook it to pure camp by bothering to find a real core to each of the characters. And I love the choice of not developing anyone beyond the three, because by doing so he keeps within that tension of the relationship being the definition of their lives, their tennis careers and their relationships. Successfully showing the volleys so to speak to build towards what each man does to the other, to what Tashi does to them, and making sure we can get to that final game effectively. And speaking of, Kuritzkes’s screenplay structure is nearly flawless in its way of breaking the chronological order in way that invigorates and informs the final game rather than getting in the way of it. The only major criticism I have is the implementation of the Atlanta scene just feels less precise and particularly how it introduces then goes forward is the one bit that still doesn’t quite work for me. I think storywise that beat is important but there might’ve been another way to have included it. Regardless, even with that criticism it is a great screenplay.
Lucas:
Zendaya - (I’ll start out with my minor criticism and maybe it is just because she does still look so young and she just had that working against her. Regardless, unlike Faist & O’Connor where I 100% felt the stages of the ages of the characters and their life experiences in a believable way, I didn't quite believe Zendaya's presence fully felt “older” in her “present” scenes. Having said that I liked everything else she does in the role however, in bringing pivotally this sort of bluntness in her performance where there are specifically the moments where you see the keenest eyes in the way she is playing around with both men. Zendaya has the best moments in those silent ones where you can see what she gets out of it, particularly in her reaction to the final game which is pitch perfect throughout. She’s also though very effective in projecting a different kind of confidence from O’Connor, or the false confidence of Faist, as her is an authoritative confidence within her character, where she doesn’t really grant any doubt within her character rather has this firmness in her deliveries that don’t leave room for any sense that what she is doing could possibly be less than perfect. Such as her delivery of “I Know” that isn’t Han Solo hiding his feelings, it is truly dismissal as though such love is just something she accounts for no more than that.)
Luke:
If we're saying their breakout came after 45ish:
Morgan Freeman, Mark Rylance, Samuel L. Jackson, Richard Farnsworth & Paul Scofield.
Marcus:
Yes. I think The Brutalist underperformed in part because probably many voters hadn't seen it yet, and Brody was still able to get in because he got votes sight unseen thanks to the thinness of the category and the early word on his performance was so positive. And as I've noted before, Chalamet really isn't like Foxx or Malek, in that both had much more dramatic material to work with (Blindness, Racism, AIDS, Drug addiction, closested homosexuality) than Chalamet (...wants to play with an electric guitar).
SAG is more likely to vote on "narrative" but Anora is very strong there, so absolutely think Madison can win given she is so essential to her film.
Louis: Rating and thoughts on Daniel Craig.
Louis: What are your thoughts on Timothy Spall in Wicked Little Letters?
So Louis, what were your thoughts on the direction and cinematography of Nickel Boys?
Louis: I know he was originally cast as Laszlo, but how do you think Joel Edgerton would’ve fared as Harrison instead? I’d hate to take away Pearce’s long-overdue nom, but that role seemed like it would’ve fit Edgerton more than Laszlo.
Luke:
Craig - 4(This is one where I didn’t fundamentally connect to the performance and maybe it was the material, the film or perhaps it was Craig. I just never quite found myself invested in Lee as a person as he tries to go on a strange personal quest in South America. Having said that, I do think Craig is interesting in the way he presents his performance as a basically one of constant awkwardness of a man who is, as he’d say it, “queer”, but weirdly hasn’t quite accepted that fact despite living it out. Craig presents the man as a ball of uncertainties at all times, so even when he is having sex the man still doesn’t quite seem comfortable within himself by not fundamentally knowing what he’s supposed to be doing. Craig’s performance works at being lost, and even in the Manville segment, he’s even amusing in playing that being lost a bit more literally in a funny way. But I suppose maybe my problem is that he never gets not lost at any point? To the extent that I found Craig an interesting starting point for a character, but I never thought he went beyond that starting point in a way that I found compelling at the very least. And it isn’t even his broadness, I thought that worked as a man embarrassed by himself in a strange way, or at least conditioned by society to be so. I do like the performance but again like the film, maybe like how I liked the sense of place, but I didn’t find it went anywhere terribly interesting, perhaps I liked what Craig presented as the sense of psychological place but didn’t find where he went terribly interesting.)
Lucas:
Spall - (Not his most or least inspired performance, but does find a bit of being an irascible grump where you get a sense of where Colman’s character is coming from before we even approach that element. Spall chose just to be largely comedic though with purpose in that grumpiness that made his work tonally make a bit more sense than the film did overall.)
Harris:
Well I’ll talk about them together because I’d say they go even more hand in hand in this film than most, as Fray’s and Ross’s choices together very much are pivotal to the film. And I’ll begin with the mistake in my mind, which is the Diggs scene, which I get directorially they are meant to show a different time and space. But in terms of the cinematography and the direction, I found the scenes ugly and hard to look at, if not nearly headache inducing by just having this big head in the middle of the frame with far too much blur on the outsides. Did not care for the choice in the least. Then Ross, I will also say I think in the last act gets too much into the documentary elements losing the personal narrative a little too much in cutting in so much stock footage, and I will say this idea for me was better utilized in The Brutalist. Having said that, their work together for the rest of the film is quite remarkable in crafting such a specific vantage point, where you feel the visceral space through the clarity of the shots, but also the way it has certain points of fixation as a person does glancing around a space. There the film works in creating the feeling within that space, through the cinematography that gives such a sense of place, both moments of warmth and harshness. Where Ross’s work in granting the immediacy of being in this space and witnessing the experience as closely as possible, such as the first abuse scene where the sound design is utilized as pivotally in creating a specific horror within the situation. There are so many such choices that craft a one of a kind experience that is successful. And again while I think that one major choice doesn’t work, and a few others don’t upon reflection, so much does in that unique presentation thanks to that clarify of vision of both Ross and Fray.
Bryan:
Yes, though I feel we basically saw his version with Great Gatsby.
Post a Comment