Austin Butler did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Feyd-Rautha in Dune Part II.
Austin Butler takes upon the role of Feyd-Rautha the psychotic and competent nephew of chief overt villain Baron Harkonnen (Stellan Skarsgård), a role famously played by Sting in the 84 film, which much derided overall though many still take pleasure to this day in his repeated use of “I WILL KILL HIM”, so there was a little bit of an expectation going in with this character as the chief rival to Paul Atriedes (Timothée Chalamet). Which fittingly cast fellow musician biopic actor in the role, and general up and comer in Austin Butler. I previously praised Butler for what he did in Elvis though I didn’t love the film overall, he was good and particularly had a very strong presence as a performer, something that even carried over to his otherwise severely underwritten role in The Bikeriders from 2024. And on the immediate surface, Butler offers the goods as Feyd-Rautha, right from the outset as Butler’s bald look is most striking and he adds on top of that another very daring vocal performance, this time going for a severe impression of Skarsgård just as he did for Elvis in Elvis. A great choice though as he just naturally fits right into the Harkonnen without seeming like an accent just for the sake of it, he really breathes life into the character through it. Amplifying the character all the more is the physical bravado he brings in every moment of his performance, as he very presents Feyd-Rautha who is someone who wants to present himself as the force of violence and destruction. Walking and just handling himself as a man who loves every bit of violence he sows. Something that Butler accentuates potently in each of his scenes, from the opening where he casually kills a few women to test out his knife, and before that even his speaking on what he could remove with such a frankly sexual overtone to every moment of Butler’s delivery of these descriptions. He makes Feyd-Rautha the proper villain in every sense, taking the moment of killing one of Paul’s allies with noting that the execution will be pleasure with such sincerity and perhaps more than a bit of physical arousal. Offering the ideal foe to Paul in the final fight, where I have particular affection for tossing Paul’s line back to him of “May thy knife chip and shatter” as though he is living his absolute best life before the fight.
All of that would make for a good version of the character alone, finding his own way to bring to life his sadism in a less over the top but still very blunt way akin to Sting’s however with more depth even within that. But there is more to this performance than just depicting his villainy, as good as Butler is at that. Rather Butler doesn’t make him pure evil, not that what he shows him to be good, but doesn’t make him a black hole. As there’s even some vulnerability that Butler shows quite effectively, from his anger when the Baron setup a situation where he could be killed where Butler brings real vulnerability behind that, or in that gladiatorial game beforehand where he almost gets killed, Butler’s fantastic in the moment where the man has the knife on him, and in Butler’s laughing about it, there’s genuine fear glimpsed in him before he turns it around at the last minute. But Butler goes further by going as far as he can in terms of the idea of honor within the character. Something Butler consistently emphasizes that grants more nuance to the character than just another evil man, even if he is that. As in that gladiator fight, when he kills the spy, or even his own reaction to the end of the final duel, each time Butler’s delivery is with absolutely utmost honesty in his respect. He genuinely cares about the idea of honor and his eyes of someone who sees value in a real opponent or fighter. I love particularly the moment where in the original film Feyd-Rautha pestered Paul over Chani calling her his pet which Sting delivered with an extra bit of psychotic hectoring. Butler handles differently and in an intriguing way as he makes the whole moment weirdly genuine when he asks “any special attention for the pet”? Butler presents it as Feyd-Rautha very odd being yet in his deranged mind respectful offer to his opponent. As much as the character is this force for evil, and Butler delivers on that impactfully each second he’s onscreen, Butler does find nuance within the evil, creating life within the role beyond the specifics of the character in this narrative.
9 comments:
Louis: Any upgrades.
Thoughts on Villeneuve's direction.
And the title says Alternate best actor instead of supporting.
And finally have my Original song lineup:
"Better The Devil" - Strange Darling
"Dying" - Dying
"Kiss the Sky" - The Wild Robot
"My Stranger" - Your Monster
"No Matter What I Do" - Strange Darling
Louis: I completely forgot to ask you this but what is your director top ten.
He's stuck with me a lot longer than I thought he would. Very clever choice to mimic Skarsgard (and a great imitation at that), but his physicality and added touches really cut a compelling villain.
I'll go ahead with my Supporting Actor ranking prediction
1. Pearce
2. Maclin
3. Pearson
4. Borisov
5. Strong
6. Washington
7. McBurney
8. Dafoe
9. Skarsgård
10. Rogowski
I thought Guy Pearce was great, but I am kind of hoping someone else takes it this year. Obviously my ideal choice is Denzel but I’d be more than happy with Maclin or Pearson.
Louis, thoughts on the Critics Choice Winners? That Anora win was totally unexpected. Has there ever been a film that has only won BP and nothing else at CC?
Luke:
Villeneuve is a natural continuation of his work on the first film though with an even wider scope and greater ambition. The scale of the work in terms of every aspect is so remarkable and captivating in terms of the detail he gives the world both in creating the houses, the world and so forth, and the very tangible sense of place in the desert or the black sunned world of Geidi Prime. His work is an achievement just in the vision but there are moments that are particularly stand out in just great filmmaking, such as the attack on the Harkonnen spice craft, both duel scenes along with again the whole presentation of Feyd-Rautha’s birthday, and especially the first worm ride of Paul which is done just as one of the great purely cinematic scenes. While also telling an overall story rather captivatingly is both a realization and subversion. As you see the moments of grandiose splendor of romance purely but Villeneuve slowly subverts that in the specific religious fervor he develops that gradually becomes less inspiring and more disturbing at a certain point. The one aspect I think is imperfect is the pacing of the last act does feel rushed and there is the hanging question of Villeneuve’s choice, that carried from the last film, to focus less on the political and plot elements, though I would say this lessened a bit here, it was still present in the cutting out of Tim Blake Nelson and Stephen McKinley Henderson which shows it to be very much directing not a screenplay choice. And while what we got is terrific, I do wonder if filling out the story that much more could’ve made it a full on masterpiece which I don’t quite consider this film or this duology to be.
Let me hold on until I see I’m Still Here, which should be soon.
J96:
I genuinely don't care about critics choice and don't think they influence anything in terms of the actual race.
Post a Comment