Hugh Grant did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a BAFTA, for portraying Mr. Reed in Heretic.
Heretic follows two Mormon missionaries (Sophie Thatcher, Chloe East) who unfortunately enter the house of a committed reddit user.
Hugh Grant plays that committed reddit user, and in so many ways Hugh Grant is this film because getting to see him just sink his teeth into a villainous performance is the majority of the reason to watch this film which…I’ll get into a little later. As right off the bat when the two Mormons sister Barnes (Thatcher) and Paxton (East) approach Grant’s Mr. Reed’s house to spread their word, Grant is a tremendous amount of fun. Grant is very much utilizing his known presence as the stuttering yet charming leading man, who may blink more than once, in setting up the seemingly harmless enough older man who wouldn’t mind inviting in the two women for a discussion on religion. Grant very much brings the charm he was typically called upon in the majority of his 90’s to 00’s performances with his bright smile and generally slightly goofiness that creates an affability. Grant alludes to the eventual nature of the character however in just slightly off glances as he encourages the two to come into his house, which they refuse until he assures that his wife is inside “baking pie”. Grant is convincing enough to bring in moments mostly by being the Hugh Grant presence we’ve come to expect, and is kind of the tee off for the character as essentially once they enter the house it is the slow switch from one nature to another.
Grant very much IS the film because so much of it becomes a whole lot of just talking about religion as Reed begins to discuss religion about them. Grant's first switch becomes a mix between his old charm though now with this growing directness in his delivery. Grant’s wonderful in the way he smiles after every sort of beat in the discussion almost to disarm them one more time, even as Mr. Reed, for someone seemingly just curiously interested in the Mormon church, offers some vast knowledge of the specifics of the founding of the faith. Where Grant emphasizes certain pieces of these descriptions with a cold analysis suddenly, where it seems less of him opening for further discussion and more so the first in what will be many attacks along the way. Something that continues as he questions more from each of the sisters, where Grant becomes more intense in his questioning and you see sort of any of that charm in Grant fade away suddenly in moments to great effect. Grant’s eyes become so cold such when he asks about Barnes’s deceased dad, specifics about his death and then asking if she’s contacted him from the presumed afterlife. Grant in particular suddenly loses any semblance of his little smile having a tremendous impact as his eyes instead begin to pierce as the man begins to try to break down both of the women to their very core.
At a certain point Reed kind of loses any notion of pretending he is just “curious” with slightly sinister undertones to just openly direct in his attacks on the beliefs of the women and notes that he will help them find the “one true religion” where all sort of warmth purges from Grant’s face which is most disturbing from him in particular. Which becomes more alarming when the women find they can’t get out from the door they came in and Reed doesn’t seem like he intends to allow them to leave. Grant is having a ton of fun in this performance, and very much makes these scenes work just by having the fun that he does. As Grant very much plays around with the nature of the character, such as when he purposefully builds dread, where Grant is very entertaining by very much playing Mr. Reed as knowing about his own increasingly sinister nature, and that Mr. Reed himself is having fun in the strange game of his. Grant selling honestly so many of the lines that frankly go a bit on and on to say the least in setting up that the women can’t leave, and making them sing simply by his delivery of them that infuses each with an energy that is captivating within his own performance even as honestly the dialogue starts to get a bit repetitive.
Following this we get Mr. Reed goes into his very long screed against religion by challenging every facet of their religious beliefs by connecting elements of pop culture and general beliefs while going about taking stabs at various aspects of religious beliefs. And what makes this scene work is largely Grant because he really colors every aspect as we very slowly rundown Reed’s thesis on the growth of monotheistic religions. Grant does this by just being so playful with all his different lines in going in really surprising directions in just throwing random bits of color to accentuate one line or another, creating an unpredictability within the very long exposition. Grant’s delivery is engaging in itself by itself, he’s just a delight to watch here in running with every line he has, but it also does serve the film in the way he switches on dime adds to the potential danger of the character. Because Grant so naturally goes goofy in one moment by his suddenly singing of “Creep” with an American accent, or at one point even doing a Jar Jar Binks impression, to being straight in his refined accent, to suddenly getting the glints in his eye of a most nefarious purpose. Grant is just dancing around with the lines that get through the scene just beautifully, and entirely makes the scene through his performance. Honestly I think if you had a lesser actor, the scene itself probably would crumble, but Grant makes it work.
Unfortunately the crumbling comes right after this scene anyways, where Mr. Reed makes the sisters choose a door and clearly the screenwriters had no particularly clever ideas of where to take this story after the screed scene. As we get into a whole dumb thing where Mr. Reed apparently has these captive troglodyte women to make a false miracle where one revives by eating a poisoned pie by having doubles, which in itself is a ridiculously dumb plan since he tells the women what’s in the pie, he could’ve just lied about the contents of the pie to begin with. Anyway it is all to get them to eventually find a hidden layer where every choice led to him controlling them to get them to say religion about control, which he wants because he wanted to be a serial killer who gets people to denounce their faith beforehand? To get them to become troglodyte women maybe? As we never do get why he even has them. Something? I don’t know, I don’t think the screenwriters knew either, as the film completely falls apart, finding nowhere to go and not really giving Grant anything interesting to do after a certain point. I’ll give Grant credit he’s still good, and elevates every line he does have, bringing the right still entertainment value mixed in with a chilling cutting into every time he springs up to hassle the women some more. But in the end he can do only so much with just how weak the material gets by the end of the film. Still even with the letdown of the film as a whole, Grant runs with the showcase he does get in the first half of the film, and successfully utilizes what made him such a popular actor in the first place combined with some new shades of his talent beyond the pigeonhole he had been placed into.
38 comments:
When you get to 2018, do you intend on watching A Very English Scandal. I intend on recommending Les Misérables the interim period before you do that year so it'll give you time to watch both it and The Terror.
I'm fairly confident I've won this lineup prediction.
'reddit user' lol.
have you decided on a set ranking for the cinematography nominees yet?
"Committed reddit user" is very funny.
Louis: What are your thoughts on Lior Raz in Gladiator II and Dave Merheje in Sometimes I Think About Dying?
What did you think of Washington and Norris in The Six Triple Eight, and could I get your rating for the former?
Tim:
Leaning towards
1. Nosferatu
2. The Brutalist
3. Maria
But razor thin margin still.
Lucas:
Raz - (I would say slightly underutilized in the plotting of the piece, still he's appreciated most for just allowing Mescal to show his immense talent for a few scenes, as their chemistry really is quite strong. They bring just a natural warmth together, where Raz manages to deliver an easy weight to his words where he conveys an innate humanity in the encouragement and wisdom of his character.)
Merheje - (Very much not your typical Hollywood love interest as he's just a somewhat goofy guy who likes movies, but he brings that goofiness in a believably disarming way against the purposefully extremely introverted Ridley. And while he mostly asked for the consistency he's also good just in the brief scene of frustration and confusion that he presents as straight earnest reactions to trying wrap his head around Ridley's character.)
Harris:
Washington - 1.5(I think she watched a whole bunch of drill sergeant performances and decided to go bigger. As her performance for a majority of the film is just ridiculous in terms of playing the overt type in a way that doesn't feel at all convincing and feels extremely performative in its broadness. Which would be okay if first you believed the broadness, you don't, or she conveyed nuance within it to kind of show the person within the part she plays to the troops so to speak, which she also doesn't do. She eventually has quieter moments but they come off as just a different person entirely and she moves to be okayish but hardly even particularly good to make up with just how ridiculous her performance is.)
Norris - (Speaking of ridiculous, Norris is just atrocious here I'm sorry to say, though given just about everyone is bad I think Perry just probably pushes his performers in the wrong direction. Norris goes for the most over the top southern General routine, playing the note as blustery as possible, with an accent and overall approach that isn't even slightly convincing. Making it worse is he has to be the villain which he goes even bigger with his grimaces and every reaction. Just terrible work.)
Luke:
Possibly.
I also finished Boardwalk Empire season 2, which I really liked as a continuation of the strengths of the first season and being particularly successful in terms of exploring some of the side characters more, particularly Eli, Van Elden and Harrow. Although I was not surprised to learn that the Commodore/Jimmy story was determined somewhat by behind the scenes requirements as I did feel it felt a bit rushed, however thought it ended quite powerfully regardless.
Cast Ranking:
1. Shea Whigham
2. Jack Huston
3. Michael Shannon
4. Michael Kenneth Williams
5. Michael Stuhlbarg
6. Michael Pitt
7. William Forsythe
8. Steve Buscemi
9. Paz de la Huerta
10. Kelly Macdonald
11. Dabney Coleman
12. Stephen Graham
13. Glenn Fleshler
14. Dominic Chianese
15. Julianne Nicholson
16. Aleksa Palladino
17. Gretchen Mol
18. Bill Camp
19. Anthony Laciura
20. Vincent Piazza
21. Anatol Yusef
22. Christopher McDonald
23. Erik LaRay Harvey
24. Ted Rooney
25. Adam Mucci
26. Bill Sage
27. Charlie Cox
28. Heather Lind
29. Paul Sparks
Top 3 I'd consider particularly outstanding.
Louis, what films would you pair each BP nominee with for a Double Feature?
I predict:
Dune Part II / The Empire Strikes Back
The Brutalist / The Pianist
I'm Still Here / Central Station
A Complete Unknown / Walk the Line
Nickel Boys / The Shawshank Redemption or Life is Beautiful
Emilia Perez / Chicago
Anora / True Romance
The Substance / Perfect Blue or Black Swan
Conclave / Black Narcissus
Wicked / Labyrinth or Wild at Heart
J96, you'll find his double feature choices here:
https://actoroscar.blogspot.com/2025/02/alternate-best-actor-2024.html
The Substance/Perfect Blue is an inspired pairing, though.
Louis, would you say Yura Borisov's performance in Anora is comparable to Robert Forster's in Jackie Brown, in that they're both giving rather subdued performances as quiet, good-hearted men involved in the world of crime who wind up in an entanglement with the titular protagonist?
Anonymous:
Yes that is actually a very apt comparison.
Louis: Did you mean to rank Alexander Karim in Gladiator II instead of Lior Raz?
Culkin and Saldana win BAFTAs, think that's the Supporting races done and dusted unfortunately.
Yeah sadly they're done. Such a shame that two lead, and not particularly exemplary performances are going to win (far less than exemplary when it comes to Saldana).
On the flipside, Brody and Madison are our BAFTA winners in the lead categories
Yeah the lead wins (in the lead category that is) at least were extremely deserving.
But Conclave wins Best Film, which ... sure ig
Delighted for Madison to win a televised award, think it helps Torres more than anything else. Although if she also surprises at SAG...then Lead Actress is a proper race that I won't know who will win until it's all said and done.
Tahmeed: If Madison wins at SAG, I think the Oscar is very much hers. Can't imagine a SAG and BAFTA winner losing to a Golden Globe and Critics' Choice winner
Anonymous:
BAFTA, as a best picture precursor is actually surprisingly weak. So I think it is still Anora's to lose.
Tahmeed:
I think even without SAG it is still a race, because Madison is the lead of the likely best picture winner. The only time in the last 20 years someone who lead best picture, with a major win (SAG or BAFTA) and lost was Ejiofor (and in that instance McConaughey weirdly wasn't even nominated for BAFTA).
Louis: Oh yeah, for sure, but still, underwhelming that Conclave won and not The Brutalist
Louis: Thoughts on this scene from Columbo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNZR58ysUUI
Eh, I was expecting Berger to pick up some of that BAFTA boost considering they loved him and AQOTWF.
I don't think it's nearly enough when everyone else has settled on Anora as the pick for this year, though, but it does help to be the favourite for Editing and Adapted Screenplay.
Also, while I don't really believe this will happen, if the Academy were to switch up on Zoe, I wouldn't be shocked if they went with Rossellini instead. Right time, right place for a legacy win in a film with some decent momentum. It's obvious it's still Zoe's to lose, but the only other possibility is her in my eyes.
Paddington in Peru sadly is missing a few essential ingredients in order to make the special marmalade sandwich of the previous two films. It actually isn’t quite as far off as some disappointing sequels, the returning actors are game enough, Banderas and Colman as the new pros in the bear world are most welcome, the scenario including the twists are all decent enough, some fine gags, but just enough things aren’t quite fully there, something say a better director might have refined. It is shot much flatter, the timing of the gags isn’t quite as good, and the heart isn’t nearly as palatable. Part of that also sadly is the sequelitis replacement of Sally Hawkins for Samantha Mortimer, and Mortimer isn’t even bad, she just doesn’t quite strike up the same specific chemistry that Hawkins had which kind of pulled the family together in a way. Still an easy enough watch, but doesn’t elevate the genre in the way the first two films successfully did.
Bonneville - 3.5
Mortimer - 3
Whishaw - 3.5
Harris - 2.5
Joslin - 2.5
Walters - 3
Colman - 3.5
Banderas - 3.5
Tous - 2.5
Atwell - 2(Why did they make her American?)
Thoughts on the cast.
Luke, your Mike Leigh ranking.
Adrien Brody, for my money, is the most unlikely 2 times Oscar winner EVER. Wins an Oscar and doesn't do a lot of note afterwards, and many people speculate that he's never going to reach that peak, and he immediately comes back to not only deliver a great performance, but straight up win his 2nd Oscar.
Anonymous: I'll give you my answer to that tomorrow.
So with BAFTAS here's my updated predictions
Picture: Anora
Director: Corbet
Actor: Brody
Actress: Moore
Supp. Actor: Culkin
Supp. Actress: Saldana
Matt: what makes you think Corbet will be different from Fincher in 2010 and Linklater in 2014 (i.e. DGA losers but GG and BAFTA winners), particularly when you're predicting the DGA-winning film to win Best Picture?
Anonymous: I don't know.
Luke:
Bonneville, Whishaw & Walters - (Both just good reprises and a natural continuation of their work from the previous films.)
Mortimer - (She really does try to bring a similar energy without just copying Hawkins, unfortunately it just doesn't quite cohere within the tone or with the chemistry with the family as well.)
Harris & Joslin - (Honestly felt like they were phoning it in at times.)
Colman - (She's fun in bringing an expected spritely energy that is befitting the overall tone of the Paddington style, and she has some fun with it. Her later turn I think she also delivers on, though I wish the film let her play around with the idea a bit more. She unfortunately just has to kind of stop at a certain point, rather really it to thrive in it like say what Grant was able to do with Phoenix.)
Banderas - (He is quite a bit of fun with enough of a heart mixed there at the same time. Banderas has a nice balance between charm and silliness to hit the tone well again, but like Colman I wished they just let him go even further with some of the elements.)
Tous - (Very eh).
Atwell - (Stiff and needless accent and just stands out in a somewhat bad way for a scene.)
I hope I'm Still Here has the same luck as The Secret in Their Eyes and A Fantastic Woman, because neither of them were nominated for a Bafta but won an Oscar.
Shaggy:
There's definitely hope as I figured BAFTA would care the least about the controversy, they also were likely voting before the real meat of it came out, maybe the Academy won't care either, but one needs to believe.
Louis: If Academy voters fall for this Netflix campaign, all I expect from them is only regret and shame for having voted for Emília Perez in a few years.
Post a Comment