Monday 15 May 2023

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1961: Murray Melvin in A Taste of Honey

Murray Melvin did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning CANNES, for portraying Geoffrey in A Taste of Honey. 

A Taste of Honey follows a young woman Josephine (Rita Tushingham), living in somewhat dismal circumstances with her alcoholic mother Helen (Dora Bryan), who gets impregnated by a sailor.

Murray Melvin comes into the film about halfway through after Jo is essentially left alone in her mother's ramshackle apartment after both her mother and her lover have gone. Melvin's character is notable here in being one of the very first prominent and openly homosexual characters. More notable I think because the film isn't focused upon his prosecution as such, as was the case with the characters of Victim also from 1961. This is a trait of Melvin's Geof, but it doesn't define his existence. We are introduced when Jo invites him to live with her part due to his circumstances as an outsider, which she sees herself as too. Melvin's performance is particular in his portrayal of Geof's state as kind of not quite assured of his place as Jo quizzes him on his preferences. I think it is important to note the way Melvin depicts this not as shame in his reaction but rather fear and frustration of someone who knows his way of life was literally a criminal offense at the time. Melvin's performance does deliver a certain awkwardness within Geof, however, the awkwardness he presents is specifically in being mixed within a society that in no way accepts him. Melvin's performance has a combination of overt tension within his physical manner as he attempts to ignore Jo's prods initially, but what is remarkable in his performance is his eyes which always denote this greater understanding and intention. Murray just in his eyes conveys far more consideration within his experience than he will fully share really at any time throughout the film. 

An important moment happens early on in the relationship when Jo pesters Geof about his relationships with men and essentially treats him as some sort of exhibition for her to play with. Melvin is great at this moment in the immediate sense of real frustration you see in his eyes and just blunt disregard for the nonsensical line of questioning. Murray is terrific because as much as he shows the real vulnerability in Geof in the frustration, he also does portray a quiet strength within the character by so tangibly presenting this direct refusal to become some kind of object to be ridiculed or gawked at by Jo. Of course, the overriding quality of Jo as a character is her childishness that goes along with her need of being an actual adult given she will be a mother soon, and in turn, she does eventually take a more respectful tone towards Geof turn their relationship grows. Melvin's performance is essential in making this relationship meaningful which is quite contrasting in terms of the performances. Tushingham's performance is very juvenile, intentionally so and effectively so, and while there are elements of that in Melvin's performance there is also this subtle, nearly hidden directness within his work that gives Geof such a tremendous impact within the narrative. 

Melvin's performance isn't one really so much about big moments but a series of little moments throughout his performance where he just manages to deliver so much depth within Geof's particular story that lives in tandem but also in separation from Jo. Much of the time we see Geof attempting to be the responsible one when it comes to raising the baby, and while his delivery again denotes a nearly blithe manner of the man just stating a light need, his manner is much more direct in creating this sense of urgency in terms of getting prepped for the child. Melvin projects this consistency in the concern and shows very much an instinctual sense of trying to prep as a good father would even as Jo is often doing very much the opposite. Melvin creates a particularly potent sense of empathy just quietly in this manner, even again he contrasts this often with his delivery, which doesn't feel inconsistent rather he depicts a certain shyness of Geof trying to be careful how he comes onto the situation even if he cares deeply. The moment of trying to ask Jo to marry him is brilliant work from Melvin because he shows throughout it that it does very much come from love though not a place of sexual interest. Even when he kisses her it is of this kind of act of attempting to live up to the expected standard and Melvin is wonderful in that the kiss is distant, but now in his eyes, the intention of the concern of Geof is wholly true. In his work, as he attempts to basically make things right with Jo, by bringing her mother back, who he isn't aware of her real nature, Melvin is great in just his reactionary moments. The moment of objecting to their instant hostility, and Melvin quietly noting the ever real concern of Geof throughout it all. His best scene actually might be a completely final one in the final where we see Geof considering going to stay with Jo or leave her. And Melvin is able to say so much in this consideration and is truly moving in reflecting the way Geof is considering this connection, while also sensing the imperfectness of it all at the same time. Melvin's performance is a great one because I think there were so many ways this character could've drifted off into stereotype or even just to limit him as there only to be the "best friend". Melvin successfully, even if so subtly, always makes Geof as the man very present within every action, showing where the man seeks connection, while still is his own person even when existing in this relationship. It is a fantastic performance that delivers so much warmth in his supportive state, but as consistently crafts his own powerful portrait of a man in his own kind of personal isolation. 

43 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast.

Anonymous said...

Louis, did you watch season two of Slow Horses.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: I fully get what you meant regarding Barry/BCS……but I was actually referring to NoHo Hank (sporting flashy suits, his successful business, repressing trauma about someone from his past…sort of). My mistake!

Robert MacFarlane said...

I’m watching Season 3 of The Great, and episode 6 pulls one of the biggest midseason gambits I’ve seen in quite some time. Or at least, a midseason gambit I respect and understand.

(I’m REALLY salty about Sally for the reasons you mentioned in the other post.)

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Haven't seen the specific films you mentioned for McAdams, though she's certainly a similar type to both Day and Keaton. Debicki as Lisa is dead-on, I could see her in a lot of Grace Kelly roles.

Regarding imaginary recastings, which method do you use more - thinking of which actors are similar, or thinking of roles that are similar to ones they've played? Do you also ever mentally recast certain roles when watching a movie?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Such a brilliant performance of a character that was really ahead of its time. Love that you mentioned the ending, his reaction of hope and pained acceptance is perfection.

Calvin Law said...

Fantastic performance and concur with you and Tahmeed on this portrayal of a gay character being rather ahead of its time. What are your thoughts on Melvin in general, because he was an actor who I always liked seeing pop up in things for his voice and screen presence, but this performance makes me wish he'd gotten more chances to sink his teeth into a properly substantial role.

Calvin Law said...

Also, Louis: your thoughts on the Jess/Greg scene from last episode of Succession? In some ways perhaps one of the most important scenes in really letting the enormity of what just happened sink in, imo

Shaggy Rogers said...

Hey guys
Update on my Top 10 prediction of Louis' supporting actor in 1961:
1. Clift
2. Nakadai
3. Stephens
4. Gleason
5. Melvin
6. Schell
7. Scott
8. Ganjirō II
9. Malden
10. Wallach

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the whole wasabi sequence in the most recent Succession? Always love seeing Adam Godley show up.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Tushingham - 5(Her performance I think walks the line between juvenile and adult so effortlessly, which is particularly essential for the film. Although Jo is well written as a character I think there could've been an easy way for the character to fall into simplicities or to just be intolerable given that many of her behaviors are pretty horrible in their petulance. Tushingham's presence though brings this petulance quite bluntly and perhaps is intolerable in moments, however even in those moments though she realizes these as the actions of someone whose maturation was broken and left incomplete. The way she balances the bratty moments is the moments of childish joy or wonder in other scenes. She manages to be wholly convincing in these scenes, like the ending shot of the childish joy of a sparkler, she manages to make from the same stunted growth as the rest of her behavior however in doing so makes one be able to stand how she is so essentially broken by her poor childhood. And I think you have with these other moments the honest moments of trying to find some joy in her life that are so earnest, and as honest are the moments of frustration with her plight. Tushingham doesn't excuse Jo for her behaviors, which aren't always great, but at the same time she does show you all the very human vulnerabilities that make Jo who she is.)

Bryan - 4.5(Her performance I think manages to avoid the cliches of the bad mother because she finds variation really in her horribleness, but she's not always horrible in the way. Bryan is rarely exactly warm but there are moments when she exudes a certain connection with her daughter even if it is always fundamentally broken in some way. Bryan though does create the sense of history of mother and daughter so potent and so real. She is of course hostile and she creates really the future Jo potentially in so many ways in her eagerness for the cheap thrills and even the childish joys at times. Her performance like Tushingham doesn't simplify the brokenness ever but rather makes it all painfully real in its rawness.)

Stephens - 3.5(Has the sort of pompousness but I think he actually finds the right balance not to become over the top. Stephens shows this sort of annoyance towards Jo quite bluntly, and his own sort of immediacy of a lustfulness of his more theoretically joyful behavior.)

Danquah - 3.5(He doesn't have too much to do, but I do like his performance as a contrast to really everyone else in the film. Someone who isn't caught up with past traumas and in turn, you can see how he is such an obvious temporary solace.)

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

I haven't but only just because I haven't gotten around to it.

Tony:

I don't when watching a movie, try just to take it in. I typically think about the actor's general range and presence, which includes other performances, but also theoretically who would do well/be interesting in the part.

Calvin:

Excellent use of one of the most prominent background characters of all time in Jess, and I think the right time in giving her a bit more, that I liked was still in her kind of calm asides line but with just a bit more directness. Braun is great in the scene though in expressing the weight as he's thinking about it but also setting it aside. Above all though there is something darkly comical in the moment of consideration along with the weight that is very much there.

Tahmeed:

Loved it as the perfect random bit of comedy, and while Godley is a bit in the milquetoast type role he's usually placed in (though proven by The Great he's capable of far more) I was so happy that they had this scene to give him more to do. And great suffering acting from him, also great MacFadyen turning into attempting full bossing around Tom, and Braun having pitch-perfect delivery in his less than hurried way and his correcting "It's just a hint of lemon" that was just the perfect button on the scene.

Tony Kim said...

It'd be pretty funny if McKern just turns out to be a 5 and Louis' #1.

Louis - Your thoughts on Rachel McAdams in these roles:
Erin Brockovich
Elle Woods
Gloria (Colossal)
Rachel Dawes
Hildy Johnson
Fran Kubelik
Amy Dunne

Anonymous said...

Louis: your thoughts on Samantha Morton as an actress?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

In a very up-and-down season so far, I have to admit that tonight's Ted Lasso was great, and genuinely recaptured everything that felt missing before. Waddingham was especially brilliant throughout, but Goldstein and Temple are great too.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I’m not sure I agree with Tahmeed. Nate gets a redemption arc because he got laid? The whole thing with the dad felt unconvincing.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Robert: I don't think Nate has redeemed himself yet either, but I'd argue the stuff with his family helps explain the self-sabotaging and self-loathing that has practically defined his character from the beginning. I do agree with you regarding the stuff with Jade, I felt it undermined everything Mohammed did in Season 2 way too soon.

Anonymous said...

Louis, thoughts on Dead Reckoning Part 1 trailer.

Anonymous said...

Luke, if 2009 is due to be next, what are your rating predictions for the lead actor lineup.

Luke Higham said...

Darin - 5
Foster - 5
Whishaw - 4.5
Rahim - 5
Giamatti - 4.5
Taylor-Johnson - 4
Holbrook - 5
Song - 4.5/5
McHattie - 4.5
Stuhlbarg - 4.5

8000S said...

Louis: Thoughts on these scenes from the animated adaptation of the Dark Phoenix saga?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWts_5blT_I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of-c6ZJNP8c

Also, any thoughts on the voice actors for Sebastian Shaw and Emma Frost? Honestly, whoever voiced him was perfect for the part.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I just finished Season 3 of The Great. With the exception of a misgiving concerning one character's fate in the first episode (and even then my thoughts are complicated), I thought the season was entirely brilliant and deserves at least 10 acting nominations. Honestly it's one of my favorite seasons of TV I've watched in some time, and it sucks that Hulu/Disney seems to be burying it this year. Fanning this year's MVP, though Freddie Fox had me laughing with basically every line reading and facial expression.

Marcus said...

Louis: Your top 10 Antonio Banderas acting moments?

Anonymous said...

2009 be next, please. The Worst Year of the 2000s

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Killers Of The Flower Moon trailer.

Luke Higham said...

DiCaprio's positioned as the LEAD whereas Plemons took a backseat.

Calvin Law said...

Killers of the Flower Moon looks incredible, some really haunting shots in there. Particularly looking forward to Gladstone who looks extremely promising.

Anonymous said...

De Niro looked really sinister from his few seconds. I think he will steal the show.

Matt Mustin said...

I think Gladstone will be MVP.

Tony Kim said...

KotFM looks unsurprisingly excellent.

Luke: Doesn't surprise me, the THR article announcing Plemons' casting conflicted with other reports saying that DiCaprio and Gladstone are the leads.

Robert MacFarlane said...

There was a recent interview where Scorsese and DiCaprio explained why Plemons' character wasn't the protagonist like the book. https://deadline.com/2023/05/martin-scorsese-interview-killers-of-the-flower-moon-leonardo-dicaprio-robert-de-niro-1235359006/

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

Brockovich - (Seems like a role she'd do well with as it requires low key earnestness which is what she's best at.)

Elle Woods - (Well I haven't seen Legally Blonde...)

Gloria - (I often see her in the same generalized type as Hathaway, but prefer McAdams, except when it comes to singing, so yes.)

Rachel Dawes - (No I think the character needs an innate edge which I haven't seen in her, and no I don't count Regina George's particular edge as the type of edge I think would've helped the character. Though Katie Holmes also most definitely lacked such an edge too, however I will say she would've been better than Holmes regardless.)

Hildy - (Ideal casting really and I'd love to see her do a full on screwball comedy written well of course.)

Fran Kubelik - (Ideal casting once again as low key humor, heart, but vulnerability is in the right wheelhouse.)

Amy Dunne - (Well she'd certainly bring some actual "amazing" to her Amy that was completely absent from Pike's portrayal, who was obviously psychopathic from the start. Don't know if she'd be as convincing in the psychopathic scenes though so a toss up.)

Anonymous:

Morton doesn't just look like Emily Watson, but also very much feels so much like her in her early work that was this combination between intensity and extreme vulnerability, that they both crafted in such a dynamic screen presence. Both having such power just in one teary eyed look. Although also capable of some enjoyable kookiness when needed as well. Similarly though sadly, like Watson, she's struggled a bit in later years to find decent roles and has struggled more with them. Although I think that speaks more to the film industry than her talent which is considerable.

Anonymous:

More Mission Impossible scenes...so more than enough for me.

8000's:

I mean much much better than certain other Dark Phoenix adaptations. Anyway, the first scene actually allows some genuine badassery from Wolverine, quoting Dirty Harry of course, which was nice as I think something strange in the series was how common it was for the X-men just to constantly get their butts whooped on a regular basis. The same is true for the second scene with the rest getting a bit of something to do, though I'm not sure Shaw's explanation to defeat Beast exactly makes sense. Although the ending of the scene perhaps is most fundamental to what certain movie adaptations get wrong, in that there must be a corruption for the Phoenix to have any relevance and just instant evil is dumb. The Phoenix here instead is pulled along and the turning on Mastermind being essential in going darker, and for the limits of a show is a decent scene of mental torture.

Both arch versions of the character, however they certainly deliver on the generalized pompous regal-ness but with the right intensity to convey actual menace.

Marcus:

1. Meeting his old lover - Pain and Glory
2. Directing his actor - Pain and Glory
3. Admiring his "creation" - The Skin I Live In
4. Drugged up interview - Pain and Glory
5. Dispensing punishment - The Skin I Live In
6. Training - The Mask of Zorro
7. About his mother - Pain and Glory
8. I will never stop fighting for this life - Puss in Boots: The Last Wish
9. Salacious sword fight - The Mask of Zorro
10. All his lives - Puss in Boots: The Last Wish

Robert:

Having only watched the first episode I was quite shocked by that exit.

Luke:

Unsurprisingly looks stunning in just about every regard from those snippets. And I'll be honest, I've seen enough and just want to see the film now.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: On one had, I feel their exit was too abrupt (also concerning optics), but on the other hand... I really didn't feel their absence at all for the rest of the season. I'm not sure if it's because the performer never really resonated with me past the first season, or if maybe the character lacked purpose after a certain point. I do think it was a tad cruel how little thought it's given afterwards.

Still, if that's my only complaint for the season, it's a pretty ho-hum complaint. You're in for a ride, man.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Do you think you could see McAdams as Birdie Jay in Glass Onion?

Who do you think would've been an ideal choice for Rachel Dawes? Admittedly not a very substantial role, but the arc could've been truly affecting had Nolan landed on the right actress.

Also, your thoughts on this interview clip with Jonathan Banks? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU81CHyYlgM

Matt Mustin said...

Tony: Honestly, Rachel is a pretty weak character as written, I think Gyllenhaal did as well as probably anyone could have.

Tony Kim said...

Matt: Well she was better than Holmes at least, but I think darker and edgier roles are her strong suit. She also never quite struck the right chemistry with either Eckhart or Bale.

Calvin Law said...

I saw Fast X, and if you've been down for the ride thus far you'll be down, if not, then not so much. I enjoyed myself.

Diesel - 3.5
Momoa - 3
Rodriguez - 3
Statham - 3
Gibson - 3
Ludacris - 3
Cena - 4
Brewster - 3
Kang - 3
Emmanuel - 3
Larson - 2.5
Ritchson - 3
Melchior - 3
Theron - 3.5

RatedRStar said...

Indiana Jones getting very bad reviews lol its not a surprise to me I thought the trailers were poor.

Luke Higham said...

Jesus, now at 33% on RT. That's embarrassing.

RatedRStar said...

Still though I am happy that Harrison Ford has won the honorary Palme d'Or, I hope he wins an honorary Oscar as well at some point.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Don't know If I should even bother with Indy's misadventures after Last Crusade. I'll pretend that after reuniting with his dad he just retired and nobody bothered him.

Shaggy Rogers said...

A friend of mine saw the film in Cannes. He said that this new one and Kingdom of the Crystal Skull make The Temple of Doom better.

Louis Morgan said...

Fast X certainly was a series of stupid scenes...that I found entertaining. Which actually for me is a definite upgrade over the last two, even if this film really makes no bones about being incomplete.

Diesel - 3
Momoa - 3
Rodriguez - 2.5
Statham - 3
Gibson - 3
Ludacris - 3
Cena - 3.5
Brewster - 2.5
Kang - 2.5
Emmanuel - 3
Larson - 2
Ritchson - 3
Melchior - 3
Theron - 3.5(Finally has fun).

Robert:

Looking forward to the rest.

Tony:

Most definitely and I probably would've preferred her.

I honestly think if Gyllenhaal had started with the role there could've been more between her and Bale. The problem is she was trying to make up ground while also exiting, and I think anyone would've struggled to ace stepping into that role.

I mean it's moving, as you can see how much the role meant to him, and really as a character actor of his age, he probably never thought he'd find this kind of success in the way he has from what was originally just a last minute guest spot. Also as per usual Cranston's comedic timing is brilliant.