James Cagney did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Tom Powers in The Public Enemy.
The Public Enemy is a largely compelling gangster film if a bit episodic, about the rise of a street thug.
Although James Cagney had been in other films prior to this one, The Public Enemy marked his breakout as a performer and established him as a star until his retirement. Cagney was one of the most talented performers of his era and much like another performer I'm going to write about soon, he shows a certain side of what can show real talent as a performer. Although often talent is most revealed by showing how one can play a number of different roles, which Cagney was also capable of, there is another talent in successfully finding variation in theoretically similar roles. Cagney was known as a gangster performer, but what is so remarkable is how well he differentiated his gangster turns. You have the sympathetic man falling into the wrong line of work in The Roaring Twenties, you have the hard-bitten but also heartbreaking depiction in Angels With Dirty Faces, and of course, you have the vile psychopathic, yet somehow still sympathetic, turn as Cody Jarrett in White Heat. All very different in their own ways, yet the consistent factor is they are all compelling in the hands of Cagney. Tom Powers of course is the original and I think a defining feature is the youth of Cagney's work here. Cagney looks young and was young. And with that, as much as Cagney was always an energetic performer, even in Ragtime, his manner here is different. It is less refined in a way, but in a way that wholly crafts its own charisma, that is all it is own even if a bit different from the more specific one Cagney ended up cultivating. There's a greater sort of pointed intensity that is just innately within his manner and just a potency about him that very much sets Tom apart. We meet Tom as a young man, and Cagney feels absolutely young. Almost a boy more than a man, particularly in the earliest scenes, and this sets up a most fascinating start for his portrayal of the character.
An early scene that realizes Cagney's approach is when Tom's straight-laced brother confronts him about his early illicit activities, which Tom scoffs at. Cagney's delivery though has an innate viciousness, before Tom is punched down for his threats. The moment afterward is what I love so much with Cagney's just the way he looks with his hair up his eye blaring with hate, he looks more like an angry dog in some ways, and his kick of the door his brother exited it from is with this animalistic instinct in his manner. Tom interestingly is somehow even the most actively rotten gangster, as you even argue Cody was mentally ill, to begin with, and was raised by someone worse than himself, as Tom chooses this life more so than any of the other famous Cagney gangsters. His advancement is very different as Cagney only makes Tom more rotten as we go along. Summarized early on perhaps, and iconically so, as Tom treats his girlfriend with a grapefruit to the face for questioning. What makes the scene so brilliant is Cagney's performance of it. It is comical in a strange way, it is juvenile in the way Cagney bites down his tongue like a schoolyard kid doing a prank, yet still twisted in the intensity and sadism in his eyes. It's a one-of-a-kind moment of psychopathy because in all reality, as Cagney makes it entirely Tom as this man playing with his amorality as a kid would, having fun with it, in a decidedly evil way, even while still in a decidedly childish way. Cagney shows a man who loves it, even as he's filled with so much hate at the same time. There is something in his face here that often offers a demonic glint to it, as Tom is someone who's lost his way, rather it is a man who has found his way, unfortunately.
The notion of childishness is pervasive within Cagney's overall approach which when you get to the heart of his Tom Powers, he's essentially a child playing the crook. Cagney's approach makes sense for the character, particularly when Tom goes and kills a horse that "killed" a benefactor in an accident. That moment of revenge has a petty manner, there isn't overt hate but rather a petulant urge that defines the moment. His later interactions with other women further this idea behind the real nature of Tom. Cagney portrays such shyness in the moments he shares with the more assertive gun moll Gwen (Jean Harlow). Cagney basically looks down in these scenes showing a little boy really trying to bring up the courage to ask the attractive girl, rather than any kind of gangster establishing any sort of dominance. This point is made all the more clear when another associate's girlfriend goes so far as to essentially date rape Tom. Cagney throughout the sequence presents essentially a meek nothingness within Tom when someone else takes control of him, particularly a woman. Cagney exudes nervousness and accentuates a boy without confidence towards the opposite sex, without any innate ability. He's not the gangster in charge of it, he's just a boy playing a game, a game that gets rather complicated when dealing with a woman, as he fails to understand women in any particular way.
The gangster life itself reveals itself as a gang as Tom finds himself ill-suited to actually establishing himself as a man of power, as his friend is quickly killed in an attack leading Tom to attempt to deal with things himself. This leads to the second most iconic scene of the film as Tom decides to take on the other gang alone in the rain, walking to them through a city street. Cagney's performance is a major facet of what makes the moment memorable. Cagney's physical work is incredible because basically the way he even sort of puffs out his chest, the way he stares with a menacing glare, even his marching tough walk, it is all an act. The act of being more than he is and Tom isn't being a gangster, Cagney's playing Tom as Tom playing the part of the gangster. The reality of this becomes abundantly clear when Tom is somewhat successful but seriously wounded from the gunfight. Cagney's physical work is as impressive as he wanders around wounded and even his delivery about their shooting skills is again like a kid who's just been beaten at a game. In the final moment of this approach, we see his family visit Tom in the hospital, all showing concern for their son despite his previous actions. Although Cagney's physicality here is limited, being confined to the hospital bed, his delivery is fantastic in creating just this subdued even shy manner as he asks for forgiveness. Not as a man with a sense of needing redemption, but rather again the apology of a child asking for forgiveness. Although I think one could argue that Cagney shows some signs of working out his presence fully as a performer here, and while I think such a criticism would be legitimate, for me even that I think adds to the overall portrayal of his Tom Powers as a boy playing at the gangster. Cagney creates such a powerful presence on screen that is defined by physicality, however, there is so much more within his work in crafting a portrait of a different kind of lost youth essentially. It isn't the same dominating force he would later become as his more confident gangster in White Heat and "Angels", yet Cagney is wholly successful, and it is not surprising he established himself with this turn, in creating a captivating one of kind presence onscreen.
54 comments:
Pleased he got his 3rd five at last.
Louis: I remember back in 2013, being shocked that he wasn't reviewed for 1931 lol, then again it was Lugosi, Robinson, Lorre, Chaplin and Karloff so it was a great year, it did feel weird at the time though that Cagney missed lol.
RateRStar:
Well occasionally I do have to fulfill the role of the Academy myself, by doing an unexpected snub.
Ratings and thoughts on the cast of Hustle?
So, this is related to the current oscar race...tonight I watched a bit of Hollywood Reporter's yearly actors round table.
I must say, Quan's reflection of his career was very insightful, as was Farrell's own retrospective about "Alexander". Fraser, meanwhile, is still so striking in his interviews as he's obviously been through so much, yet continues to be so outwardly warm and empathetic.
Also...Butler's still struggling to drop his Elvis voice.
Mitchell: did you also think Fraser sounded like he was about to cry every second? Because to me it sounded as if he had a lump in his throat the entire time and that just made me sad
Tim: Yah, it was honestly very moving to hear that level of vulnerability, which he seemed to be barely holding back.
Bare in mind, I still haven't seen "The Whale" as my local/online viewing options have always been limited for new releases. I didn't know, however, that it's story was seemingly influenced by the screenwriter's (Samuel D Hunter) own life.
I know the film's been divisive, so I'll hold off on expanded thoughts for my own viewing. That said, I guess it's easy to forget as film viewer the inner workings that go into these projects. We only get to see the finished product; We rarely get to experience the time, effort and emotion that film makers/actors put into them.
Great work by Cagney. Glad to see another 5.
I've seen The Whale twice now and it is a film with issues, but Fraser's efforts and experienced pull through a compelling performance, and I've loved his press tour, especially his interactions with Quan, which on a sidenote that Round Table is one of my favourites in years. I found Jeremy Pope's introspections particularly compelling.
Also, there's something particularly fascinating to this kind of 'early' gangster with Cagney here and say, Attenborough in Brighton Rock. I'd kind of like to see someone like Harris Dickinson take a crack at this kind of role.
yeah, i won't be able to see The Whale for a while either. It's theatre release is set for April (and it's not guaranteed it will run anywhere near me) which means the Blu Ray release probably won't happen before late August or September at the earliest
Louis: The film making at times is kinda ahead of its of time, like the second iconic scene as you said, the rain for example =D lol as odd as it sounds it looks kinda not very 1931, I do wonder why this was only nominated for story.
Saw The Son, hated the son, pretty much everything stems down to its direction but the cast isn't great.
Calvin: Ratings on the cast?
Hey guys
Update on my Top 10 prediction of Louis' lead actor in 1931:
1. Lorre
2. Robinson (Little Caesar)
3. Cagney
4. Chaplin
5. Lugosi
6. Karloff
7. March
8. Simon
9. Raimu
10. Robinson (Five Star Final)
Ytrewq:
Jackman - 2
Dern - 2.5
Kirby - 3.5
McGrath - 1.5
Hopkins - 2
Though I have been quite certain for a while that the 5th slot is going to be Mescal as I stated in nominees prediction section and that's what I want it to be of all the potential 5th slot guys(I believe Park has no chance now, sadly), Cruise's potential nomination doesn't seem as bad when you realize that Jackman was considered the most obvious nominee for the prize months ago.
Regarding the best actor category, have you guys been settled with your top 5??? Mine are Farrell, Park, Mescal, Fiennes and Pattinson. I think I comfortable for now with this quintet.
Luke, Your final 5 predictions for Lead/Supporting Actor and any remaining female performances.
Supporting
Quan
Gleeson
Dano
Schuch
Keoghan
Lead
Farrell
Fraser
Nighy
Mescal
Skarsgård
Park
Song
Chalamet
Fiennes
Rylance for 1 of his turns
These 10 I feel pretty confident about. Any one of Pattinson, Butler, Calva and Kammerer could happen as well.
And I don't see any more for the ladies.
Perfectionist_ad: Seeing that I won't see Fraser for a while, my Lead Actor top 5 so far is:
1. Colin Farrell - The Banshees of Inisherin
2. Park Hae-il - Decision to Leave
3. Paul Mescal - Aftersun
4. Song Kang-Ho - Broker
5. Ralph Fiennes - The Menu
My top five for the moment is:
1. Colin Farrell in The Banshees of Inisherin
2. Ralph Fiennes in The Menu
3. Robert Pattinson in The Batman
4. Austin Butler in Elvis
5. Alexander Skarsgard in The Northman
That is not at all final, I still have lots to see.
Perfectionist: In its current state:
1.Colin Farrell in The Banshees of Inisherin
2.Park Hae-il in Decision to Leave
3.Alexander Skarsgard in The Northman
4.Austin Butler in Elvis-5
5.Ralph Fiennes in The Menu-4.5
PGA Noms this year:
Avatar: The Way of Water
The Banshees of Inisherin
Black Panther: Wakanda Forever
Elvis
Everything Everywhere All At Once
The Fabelmans
Glass Onion
TÁR
Top Gun: Maverick
The Whale
Regarding PGA:
Avatar, Banshees, EEAO, The Fabelmans, Tar, Elvis, and Top Gun all prove they are top seven material. Although I'd say this means the least for Avatar since PGA loves moneymakers. Major get for the Whale which I think helps Chau out the most. Glass Onion needed that after being ignored by SAG, Knives Out of course also made it here, though it missed eventually. I think it *could* get in thanks to the full ten, but don't think it necessarily will. I don't think this changed things for Wakanda Forever too much, as this was its best bet, and honestly, I thought it would get in here. I think it and the Glass Onion are the most vulnerable in favor of a foreign contender (All Quiet) or a more BAFTA-driven contender (Living). Women Talking, despite the ensemble nod, feels done honestly beyond adapted screenplay, and I almost chalk that nod up to the fact that maybe some voters just voted for it because it just seems like a SAG best ensemble film. Same with Babylon.
Like it or not, Avatar is getting nominated. They could've nominated No Way Home or some random marvel flick every year save for Panther but they didn't.
Anonymous:
I don't think anyone is doubting that, the question is how well it will do overall.
So random question for everyone here...
I was watching a recent interview with Don Cheadle, and he claimed that producers were initially looking at Will Smith or Cuba Gooding Jr for his role in "Hotel Rwanda".
How does everyone think they would've faired? It's not a part that really plays to either's strengths, not to mention the hurdle with the accent ("Ali" was still relatively recent at this time). I can't help but think both would've struggled to give the same dramatic truth Cheadle did.
Mitchell: In this scenario I don't know what would be a worse scenario - Smith appearing lost and distant or Gooding Jr's histrionics.
got around to 2 big '22 releaeses recently.
Nope is pretty entertaining for the most part and i do like how Peele evolves scale-wise. Also, that was one of the most original aline designs i've seen.
But Palmer's and Perea's characters could be a bit annoying now and then and the pacing was a bit off. The first 30-40 minutes were a tad too slow, while the ending felt a bit rushed. How many movies do you know where the middle is the best part?
I wished for it overall to be a bit longer and especially Wincott's actions should have been set up more properly. It's on theme, not seemed kind of out of place in that moment.
And on Yeun's backstory: at first i was simpy confused as to what the point of it was supposed to be. Then it's explained in one off-hand remark by Kaluuya, and i just came to realise that that was a bit of wasted time for something that in the end had so little consequence.
Despite all of that, over the past days it actually stayed with me more than Us did.
Kaluuya - 4.5
Palmer - 3.5
Yeun - 4
Perea - 3
Wincott - 3.5
David - kind of wasted
I pretty much adored Everything Everywhere All At Once though. After the trailer i had been sceptical if it would be my thing (because of the sausage fingers specifically) but this is so funny, creative and emotionally resounding that it's absolutely irresistable. And i have never laughed so hard at a sentence that merely consisted of the word "Bagel!" and the mere sight of a raccoon.
Yeoh - 5
Quan - 5
Hong - 3.5
Hsu - 4.5
Shum - 3
Curtis - 4
*alien designs
RatedRStar:
The great scenes of the film are indeed very "timeless" I guess, particularly the rain scene that uses environment in a way most films didn't even attempt to broach at the time.
Matthew:
I will start I don't think Sandler is going the distance, definitely feels SAG only since he'd be 100% a sole nominee.
Latifah - 3(I have to say while I think she and Sandler had a good friendship style chemistry didn't' fully by them as a long time married couple. She brings a nice energy.)
Foster - 3(Overqualified for such a part, I mean one of his weakest years for me, as again found this a turn where I thought he was fine, but FAR from anywhere near the expectation I have for him.)
Hernangomez - 3(I think there are some stiff moments here and there, but also has some earnest moments that work as well. Not perfect but more than decent, which is definitely decent for an athlete trying acting.)
Duvall - (Is in the movie. Easy paycheck I'm guessing, but here's hoping he appears in a better role soon.)
Louis: How about Anthony Edwards? He was actually the highlight of the film for me. Found his antagonistic heel turn very funny.
Louis: Your thoughts on Chung-hoon Chung's work in Oldboy and Sympathy for Lady Vengeance.
Louis: Also thoughts on this scene from Dragon Ball Z.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLG709GlaDg
Louis: Your top 10 performances from Stanley Kubrick's films?
Louis: If you're watching Violette Nozière next, may I have your ratings and thoughts on Huppert and Audran.
Marcus:
1. Kirk Douglas (Paths of Glory)
2. Sterling Hayden (Dr. Strangelove)
3. George C. Scott
4. Peter Sellers (Dr. Strangelove)
5. Malcolm McDowell
6. James Mason
7. Shelley Winters
8. Jean Simmons
9. Laurence Olivier
10. Peter Sellers (Lolita)
Hey guys
Continuing the evaluation of the entire decade of 2010, say what were the most questionable or weak picks of the Louis winners:
Picture: I Saw The Devil
Director: Paul Thomas Anderson - Phantom Thread
Actor: Gary Oldman - Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
Actress: Jessie Buckley - Wild Rose
Supporting Actor: Christopher Walken - Seven Psychopaths
Supporting Actress: Lindsay Duncan - Birdman
Ensemble: The Master
Production Design: Cloud Atlas
Sound Editing: Take Shelter
Sound Mixing: Drive
Score: 1917
Editing: Cloud Atlas
Visual Effects: Melancholia
Costume Design: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
Cinematography: Valhalla Rising
Makeup and Hairstyling: Cloud Atlas
Original Screenplay: Phantom Thread
Adapted Screenplay: Can You Ever Forgive Me?
Song: "Do You Want to Build a Snowman?" - Frozen
And what are yours?
That's a rather uncomfortable question to give an answer to and I have far too much respect for Louis to do so.
Shaggy: None of those are questionable at all and that is such a weird question to ask.
Louis, aside from Yankee Doodle Dandy, are there any other performances from Cagney that could get upgraded.
For City Lights and The Great Dictator I really wished Chaplin had an upgrade
Louis: Speaking of upgrades, could James McAvoy go up for The Last King of Scotland? I found him to be incredibly compelling as this innocent outsider wholly buying Amin's theatrical facade and later founding himself in hot water. Hell, I wouldn't even say he's overshadowed by Whitaker at all.
I think The Great Dictator will happen when he does 1940. The speech scene alone should get him a 5.
Shaggy: Louis's picks are not the be-all, end-all. You can disagree with them, but calling his (or anyone's) choices weak or questionable is ridiculous.
Cagney's now up to a 4.5 for Yankee Doodle Dandy.
Calvin:
3.5(I'd agree I thought he did the hectoring pretty well, particularly his smug satisfaction brimming from his face when on the ground.)
8000's:
Park's collaboration with his cinematography is obviously a key one, as the cinematography likely has to realize particularly difficult and daring choices. The camera movement, the framing composition, and the shots, after are dynamic in the extreme. The way the two play successfully with angular focal points is that the action point may not be in the center, yet is crafted in purposeful choices that fill the rest of the frame with dynamic space. The use of the sudden focus and the removal of focus is a choice that may be a sloppy filmmaker makes by mistake yet Park and Chung do so in a way that feels so natural even though they bring attention to it. Choices that create a sense of sort of a madness perspective, yet so beautifully done as such. Then the lighting and the color grading of Oldboy is a fascinating blend through theoretically washed out with vibrancy, again a dangerous mix that the achievement is how good such a potentially mistaken choice can be.
Lady Vengeance one could argue is slightly less daring, however still absolutely gorgeous work that strives for challenging choices. Here there tends to be more open space, though still often off-the-wall, seemingly choices, in places his subject so precisely if just a little off=kilter that makes them stand out. Chung with Park leaves more choices of space around the subject, yet the space is flat, sort of leaving the characters just where they are in a different way. The lighting and color grading, are more overtly vibrant, beautifully so as such, with a particular choice to make the central character always so well lit, even angelic, even in her darkest moments.
Decidedly "operatic" to put it generously, and not in the way I particularly appreciate, but I'm glad people like it.
Luke:
I could not find an ideal copy of it.
Ytrewq:
Not to a 5.
Every time someone brings up Yankee Doodle Dandy, I instantly think of the song Over There, and it's stuck in my head for hours.
Louis: Could you check out Story Of Women (1988) instead of Violette Nozière.
Louis: Are you planning on doing screenplays for the next top 5s post.
Louis, forget my last comment,
Did you try this copy.
ok.ru/video/1225628256866
Guys listen
What I said is not to say that they are Louis' worst choices or mistakes, and I respect his decisions.
Give Steiger in The Pawnbroker your win.
Post a Comment