Brendan Gleeson received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Colm Doherty in The Banshees of Inisherin.
Brendan Gleeson has finally received his Oscar nomination, a fact that I think probably hasn't been celebrated enough, particularly as he received recognition for work that is an extension of the previous masterful collaboration, In Bruges, between performers with him and Colin Farrell, and director/actor with him and Martin McDonagh. As with In Bruges, the two are playing characters linked, however in very different environments and experiences from the two hitmen in a bad place (mentally not literally, we all know Bruges is like a fairytale). Gleeson's role here is very different from the compassionate older hitmen of that film, playing a particularly difficult role because in some ways Colm is intentionally often an enigmatic figure as we most frequently see him from the perspective of Farrell's Pádraic. Our first glimpse is as his presumed friend Pádraic stops by his house one morning, to which Colm does not respond to his knock. Gleeson's performance begins obscured through a window and his expression of some anger would seem though more so a man burdened by something. Gleeson's walk as Colm in itself is a great bit of character revealed just in his dramatic saunter, which again suggests someone who isn't at all walking on air. Every step feels filled with stone, his face worn by something, though we're not sure of what that is as of yet. Pádraic set up at their isolated island's pub for the two of them as though it seems he would any old day, however, this day isn't any old day. Gleeson's performance achieves a perfect tone in this scene as he is very funny while also being wholly serious in presenting the intention. Gleeson's eyes fixed into a serious glare and a very cold delivery as every word he says is about avoiding Pádraic, being anywhere other than he is. Gleeson moves around as though a man with a mission though that mission only being to avoid the man formerly known as his good friend. The actual discussion is one-sided as Gleeson's stare is so painfully without warmth as he seems to stare through Pádraic. His delivery is a kind of perfection as he states simply does not like Pádraic anymore. Comical because of just how bluntly Gleeson says it but also speaking to the state of Colm. Colm notes his disinterest in Pádraic as a man, without a specific coldness, that isn't hate but is rather a cruel certainty.
There's a particularly important moment early on as Pádraic and his sister Siobhan (Kerry Condon) pass Colm, on the walkway soon afterward. Gleeson's face seems to illustrate some bit of mystery to Colm's intentions as it is the face of a deeply depressed man, suffering in his state. This is against his moments of rejecting Pádraic which Gleeson consistently presents as the most fervent bit of conviction in the man, and an absolute as he denies Pádraic rights to friendship again and again. Gleeson through this actually gives some sense to what the character is doing, as he slowly peels away his purpose, even in his strange way that lacks the vocabulary of a man who can diagnose himself. Gleeson's noting that Colm no longer wants to waste time with Pádraic's tales of his animal's shite and no longer wants to waste time in general with the man. Gleeson's work is fascinating because he doesn't simplify this emotion, while also being very funny still in again the very blunt delivery he brings to it. Nothing the not wanting to waste his time though there is a greater melancholia about it. What is fantastic about what Gleeson does is present a certain inability to quite grasp exactly what he is saying as he is saying this however in terms of the broader implications, however, Gleeson's face wears with it that burden of a man facing his own mortality without fully being able to verbally express what that means. Gleeson logically presents that Colm is trying to find some strange purpose through two sources, one consciously and the other subconsciously. The subconscious is his dismissal of Pádraic where Colm is stubborn in his insistence that he's a dull man who he can't waste his time with. Gleeson performs every dismissal with a kind of breathy release in each statement and again with conviction as though putting Pádraic out of his life will somehow make his life more worthwhile. A demented idea potentially, however, Gleeson reveals in a way that is funny just how direct it is, yet in that directness creates a subtle sense of the vulnerability in terms of the man's mortality that fuels this conviction. Take just the way Gleeson says that Pádraic is dull, the first in that blunt funny way, the second though with a real pathos that emphasizes that this choice means a great deal to him. The conscious is very obvious, however well performed by Gleeson, that being the man's passion for music. This is probably the simplest aspect of Gleeson's performance, but as it should be. This aspect, Gleeson presents as just a simple joy in Colm's life as he finds purpose through his violin playing and attempting his new composition.
What Gleeson does consistently fully embodies this choice that is strange in the way that has such humane detail in each instance. When he expresses his need for a bit of peace, Gleeson is genuine in evoking a man trying to come to terms with his eventual demise. In the first more intimate technical moment of confession, which is a masterclass in comedic work by Gleeson but also great sense of emotional character. Gleeson is hilarious in his incredulous looks at the priest for trying to speak up for Pádraic, and his real bit of annoyance when noting he'll be "pure fucked" if he dies during this week when the priest hasn't forgiven him. When noting his loss of despair though, and throwing down his sins, Gleeson is so bluntly honest in his delivery as the way this particular man calculates things as he does. The lessened despair is that of a pure joy that Gleeson is presenting simply as that. Gleeson makes any sense, to the strange sense it is through his very violent non-violent method of trying to stop Pádraic's friend requests once and for all, as he threatens to cut off his own fingers every time his old friend speaks to him. Gleeson's work is all about the emotional conviction in this threat, which really isn't a threat but rather a promise in the way Gleeson states it so matter of factly, and even with a hint of sympathy as he notes he doesn't desire to hurt Pádraic's feelings despite it all. And I must note his final physical gesture of shushing Pádraic as the end of the threat, is such a wonderful bit of performance, as in that Gleeson shows just how real this all is to Colm. And the strange thing is that this isn't about Colm hating Pádraic, as illustrated by his help of the man after he's gotten beaten by the local police bully. Gleeson's physical performance again is fantastic because there is just a hint of a moment of his weakness as he seems to want to rekindle the friendship but quickly flattens it again in his heart to try to maintain his distance still.
This doesn't fix the conflict though as a drunk Pádraic confronts Colm, and it probably is easily one of my favorite scenes of 2022. As the conflict becomes philosophical between niceness and being remembered. Gleeson's performance plays off of Farrell so perfectly, as the low to the high in a certain sense, as he speaks with a such a fierce sense of understanding of his side as he disregards niceness and reveals such potent passion for the idea of music being more important than niceness. Gleeson brings such hope in every word about the music and such disregard towards niceness. Gleeson in every moment sells Colm's position, while also showing in a way this deep sorrow beneath it all in a way, as Gleeson brings hints of shame in his brow in those moments of disregard and a bit of a pained optimism. Gleeson shows a man for his sense of mortality needs this to be the truth, otherwise, he can't quite live with his death in sight. And as much as Colm is impressed by that moment, Pádraic's stumbling talk the next morning is less so. I love Gleeson's performance of the reaction to the moment which is anger, however not anger that is hate-based, rather wholly frustration based as in his face you see a man who realizes he must now go along with his finger-cutting threat, and also that no matter what he does it just doesn't seem to be getting through. And after the initial finger cut, one of Gleeson's best scenes is his talk with Siobhan trying to talk some sense into the situation. Gleeson is truly heartbreaking, even as insane as his finger cutting is because the verbalization of his sense of impending death is so deep seeded into his work that he shows a man who is in a way broken by knowing he's going to die. What Gleeson shows is this man is very much stuck within his internalized dread at the expense of his old friend. And what we actually see is the final break in this is when Colm's second finger cutting leads to the death of Pádraic's emotional support miniature donkey. Gleeson's reaction is kind of oddly sweet because you see in his eyes the immediate sense of real guilt and apology towards the act. Just the way now that Gleeson reacts to Farrell changes, and he no longer looks through him or detaches from him, he once again genuinely looks with interest towards him. Gleeson's whole manner changes and you see that sense of empathy now in his work, which was a key to his performance in In Bruges. And it is a remarkable change, as Gleeson shows a man who realizes his choice was that of a man who was on an island without community. I adore Gleeson's final confessional scene where again he manages tone so effortlessly, still being hilarious when arguing for the concern needed for miniature donkeys and that punching a policeman should not be considered a sin. When remarking on his guilt for the death of the donkey and his own despair, Gleeson is painfully open and vulnerable showing a man now fully experiencing what he had been trying to hold in. Conversely, though his final moment, Farrell really says it all, because just watches Gleeson's interactions with Farrell in the scene. The man looks, he listens and he understands. Gleeson shows the change in Colm so potently, as the man now once again truly listening to his fellow man and his friend, the choice he had abandoned that set stage for this bloody affair. Gleeson delivers yet another outstanding performance with Farrell and McDonagh. So naturally realizing the comedic and dramatic worth of the latter's prose, but also managing to craft such a tangible portrait of humanity out of such a potentially strange and enigmatic idea.
44 comments:
It is amazing to see Gleeson finally be an Oscar nominee. Love this work immensely, especially the cracks in his armor that he presents throughout that alludes to Colm and Padraic's earlier friendship.
No complaints here - outstanding portrayal. Really walks the balancing act of being cold yet observant, outwardly hostile yet wracked with dread internally. Another actor may have played Colm as more detached or contemptuous, but Gleeson finds moments of such tenderness and vulnerability within a complex character motive.
Brilliant work from a brilliant actor, and while I may still like his turn from "In Bruges" more, it was a great choice by the academy to recognize this performance.
Not sure if he's my favorite of the film's cast, but he's stuck with me the most. Others will accuse of him of just playing the same gruff guy he usually does, but I felt he brought a hint of despair to the gruffness that makes Colm all the more complex and tragic. And yes, it's so great to see Gleeson finally get a nomination, one of the most overdue out there.
An incredible performance full of history and complexity. Gleeson's one of the most consistent actors in the world and I was overjoyed to finally see him locked in for a nomination. He'd be my #2 behind Quan.
Louis: Would you say it's a two horse race between Gleeson and Quan, or do you feel like the Academy is dead set on a Quan win.
Also, that second confessional scene has some frankly brilliant delivery from Gleeson...
-Do you think God gives a damn about miniature donkeys Colm?
-I fear he doesn't...and I fear that's where it's all gone wrong
Just in those two lines, you can completely see where Colm's mind is at. Despairing over if he's done enough with his time, scared that he doesn't mean anything if god won't even look after a farm animal. The character's actions are perhaps difficult to like or justify, but Gleeson makes them so palpable within the context of Colm's inner crisis.
It’s actually a very accurate depiction of depression. Apathy and projection can be major signs, and I think a lot of his frustrations with Pádraic came down to him believing he was just as boring of a man as the friend he cut off. I never believed he ever truly disliked him until Pádraic revealed he tricked his student. I believe in the final scene he actually wanted to be friends again.
Oliver: I'd guess Quan has the edge slightly, mainly due to his Globe win, the popularity of his film, and his comeback narrative. Conversely, if "Banshees" were to win any actor oscar, Gleeson's might the best bet (Farrell will be fighting with Fraser, Keoghan could split votes with Gleeson, and Condon is competing with Basset). Also, Yeoh has been gaining a lot of support/a few wins thus far, so Quan isn't the only cast member voters could push for.
Really, I think we'll have to wait for SAG to better gauge each of their chances.
He's great, in the confessional scenes especially, but just in general his gruffly enigmatic work really builds to something special. I did relate to a lot of what ColmSonnyLarry was saying and feeling, even if I didn't necessarily agree with how he went about doing it (to put it mildly). Very satisfying to finally see him get a nomination.
And I'll be rewatching tomorrow (finally comes out in cinemas here!) but I feel like with time this could end up as my favourite McDonagh film.
I don't want to jinx it like we did Smit-McPhee last year, but I think Quan is more of a guarantee for EEAAO winning an acting Oscar.
As for Lead Actor based on strength of films and nominations throughout, I'd say it's between Farrell and Butler.
I still haven't watched this, which frustrates me beyond belief since McDonagh is possibly one of my 3 favorite directors working right now and I can't believe I haven't caught up on the In Bruges reunion yet, but I gotta say I wholeheartedly agree on Gleeson finally being an Oscar nominee.
Beyond criminal it has taken this long, and I think some of us have taken it for granted mainly due to how "safe" his nomination was throughout the past couple of weeks.
On Oscar races, I'm pretty certain Quan will be taking it. He just has so much support and energy built up right now that I don't think we've seen in the supporting actor race in years that seems impossible to break down. I think it helps that his performance is easier for all audiences to get behind compared to Smit-McPhee last year, who I personally thought was great but I'm not surprised he ended up being a harder sell for a full-on win.
As for Lead Actor I still think Butler will win unless SAG doesn't go for him. Farrell would be great but the Academy has proven themselves as preferring biopic performances over critically acclaimed turns, especially when they're in a popular BP nominee (i.e. Redmayne over Keaton in 2014, Malek over Cooper in 2018, etc.). Just my two cents, though.
Obviously amazing performance. "Thanks for looking after me dog, anyway."
Very happy to see Gleeson finally receive a nomination for this after 24 years of Oscars bullying, really. I hope it will raise his status in a way, as I think despite being a veteran actor with lots of great performances, he somewhat skirts on by in general consciousness - I noticed many still seem to remember him for playing Mad Eye Moody or even a goofy dad in Smurfs 2 (the horror...the horror). Maybe for In Bruges if you're extra lucky.
He was great.
Gleeson has definitely been at the stage of being an actor people respect but kind of taken for granted by many, so definitely particularly satisfying to see this raise his stature a bit.
6 fives for Gleeson. Loved his performance here.
Oliver:
I think Quan more or less has it in the bag, less so I think because of Quan's narrative (because those often fall short e.g. Stallon/Rourke/Keaton) but rather he's the most universally beloved aspect of the film even by those who don't care for it. Given how well the film did nomination wise he should be its more guaranteed "above the line" win. Gleeson I think has the smallest of chances only in terms of the academy likely I'd assume, given how well it did, wants to give Banshees a win somewhere in its 4 acting nominations. Farrell is the best bet there, but he's far from a guarantee, so well I'm not predicting a swerve, it wouldn't say it 100% impossible, just very unlikely.
Louis: Thoughts on the direction and screenplay of When a Woman Ascends the Stairs.
Louis and everbody!
The unanswered question: is Gleeson lead or supporting for you?
Louis said he considers Gleeson lead.
Louis put him in Supporting after a re-watch and the Screentime data more or less confirmed it.
Louis: Forgot to ask you on the last post, but has Lawrence gone up for Causeway?
Is McDonagh a safe bet to win Screenplay?
If McDonagh does win, that's two extremely Irish movies in a row to get that award.
I think Original Screenplay is between Banshees and EEAAO.
I think it will be McDonagh. He'll win BAFTA, he wasn't nominated at WGA so that won't matter (sidenote: if say, Fabelmans wins there I think McDonagh has it in the bag but if TAR or EEAAO does it'll still be a race), and it does seem an obvious place to award the film.
Sidenote, wish him and Peele's screenplays were competing against one another this year again.
Also, I'd recommend all to read McDonagh's screenplay, it's *really* well laid out, really flows well and he presents everything in a clear and engaging fashion on the page, a rather good read as opposed to say, a Tarantino script (not so much the content, more the presentation). Though note to several things he takes out especially towards the end (in the film's best interests, I'd say).
https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/The-Banshees-Of-Inisherin-Read-The-Screenplay.pdf
Oh and sidenote on WGA he wasn't eligible there to begin with, so doubly so not mattering.
R.I.P. Sylvia Syms
RIP Sylvia Syms
RIP Sylvia Syms
RIP Sylvia Syms
Goodbye Best Supporting Actress 1958
Louis and Luke, thoughts on Willem Dafoe potentially reuniting with Robert Eggers for Nosferatu.
Rest in peace, Sylvia Sims.
Louis and everyone: On a different, lighter note, I was watching an interview with Mark Hamill recently. He was talking about shooting the trash compactor scene in "A New Hope", about Harrison Ford having a good grasp of the "overview" in a scene, and about how "he could make a good director if he wasn't so lazy".
Beyond the funny dig at his old co-star, does anybody think there's truth to that statement? Maybe Ford's skillset is purely suited to being an actor, but at the same time, he certainly knew how to hold the screen in his prime. I would think there's some validity to him knowing how to compose shots, organize a story (presumably of an action/comedic/adventure sort), and consult with technical experts for the rest. Then again, Ford nowadays isn't exactly known for committing 100%, so it may depend on what era of his career we're looking at.
Mitchell: If Viggo Mortensen's directorial efforts are anything to go by, not every great actor should direct.
Louis: What would you say are the best scenes in these performances?
-Michael Douglas in Solitary Man
-Keanu Reeves in Matrix
-Malcolm McDowell in Caligula
-George Segal in Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf
-Kyle MacLachlan in Twin Peaks
-Dennis Hopper in Hoosiers
-Kevin Conroy in Batman:TAS
Tahmeed: Point taken. Even in films were the actor themselves isn't starring, there can be a struggle to translate their talent and vision, or simply find a compelling tone/thematic point.
Ytrewq: It's not from the Animated Series, but probably my favourite scene of Conroy's entire Batman career is the tombstone confession from "Mask of the Phantasm". I found the raw desperation and torment of Conroy's voice to be quite moving. It's such a strong moment for him, but also just a powerful scene in Batman media as a whole.
Anonymous: I hope it's a more substantial part than his role in The Northman.
RIP Sylvia Syms
RIP Sylwia Syms
8000's:
For the sake of trying to maintain my pace, I'm holding off on longer thoughts outside of 2022 discussion until afterwards.
Matt:
I think he has a great chance, I could see Field or the Daniels taking it as well though. He's probably on his third Original screenplay for BAFTA in all likelihood.
Tahmeed:
No, felt the same way about her performance.
Calvin:
The screenplay just in itself is great, but as with In Bruges, you can see McDonagh's sense as a director in what he rightly edits out in the process.
Anonymous:
More Dafoe the better.
Mitchell:
If it's not an actor's ambition probably one should stay out of it. For every Charles Laughton there is at least one Viggo Mortensen.
Ytrewq:
Douglas - (Tips to Eisenberg. Which I just noticed there's at least two films about wannabe lotharios giving Eisenberg tips.)
Reeves in Matrix - (Early interrogation by Smith)
McDowell - (Uhhh it hasn't been long but I've already purged much of it out of my mind.)
George Segal - (Discussing Honey's pregnancy)
MacLachlan: For Dougie Jones: Hearing the piano, For Doppelcooper: Arm Wrestling, For Dale Cooper: "I am the FBI"
Hopper - (When Hackman visits him)
Conroy in Batman:TAS - (Overall the tombstone scene, in the series Batman's nightmare in Two Face)
So, anyone have any thoughts on the Riseborough controversy? Me, I'm just kicking back and enjoying the drama.
Personally I think they should just let her have it, it is not as though she came into it with nothing, she got the Indie Spirit nod, she got plenty of praise, the fact is she never was going to be nominated without that effort. I mean either that or change the rules to no campaigning whatsoever.
Post a Comment