Austin Butler received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Elvis Presley in Elvis.
Elvis tells the story of the king of Rock and Roll through the eyes of Elvis's nefarious manager Blofeld...I mean Colonel Tom Parker (Tom Hanks).
Austin Butler joins the long-running list of Oscar-nominated performers playing famous musicians, a list that is filled with many uninteresting biopics that often (often deservedly) are mocked as easy academy catnip yet rather perfunctory efforts for most viewers. This sometimes extends to the often lip-synching performances by the leads, which extends as far back as at least as far back as when Cornel Wilde played Frederic Chopin. This film on the former end is mostly that, though filled through the madness of director Baz Luhrmann's style (something I wish I could love, but mostly gives me a headache), which given how tired these films are, I might've disliked less than I usually do. The other bit of strangeness is through the perspective of the Colonel pleading his case to the audience that he didn't cause Elvis's downfall, something I might've liked more if Tom Hanks wasn't so obnoxiously hammy (he could've been hammy still given the film's heightened tone just not obnoxiously hammy). This perspective does make Elvis a strange leading character in the first act or so of the film, as he takes quite a long time to appear beyond just glimpses as the colonel attempts to chase him down, and even in his first appearances, Elvis is purposefully seen as a distant figure, with the emphasis more so on his impact than in offering a more internalized perspective. The up-and-coming Austin Butler initially appears just as the idea of Elvis, and his work is almost entirely based upon a few scant words and his physical movements. Of course in a larger-than-life figure such as Elvis, that is a task in itself. And I'll say Butler is bluntly up to the task, even with the at times very overdone makeup, even beyond intention I think. His vocal performance, which apparently permanently transformed Butler's voice to that of Elvis's, is downright impressive. Elvis's voice is something that is very often impersonated and is often that of an impression. It would be very easy to become a caricature, however, Butler's vocal work does go beyond that. Butler's voice feels like Elvis's voice and doesn't feel like a put-on, which with someone like Elvis isn't a small feat in itself.
The physical movements of Elvis are of course as iconic as anything else about him, so again, Butler does have a challenge, because again while frequently impersonated in this regard, it is something else to embody this in a convincing sense. And Butler seeks to fully capture Elvis's stage persona, in almost every aspect. This includes the way he just holds his head, to every different dance move and gyration, his grander movements as really this king stage so often that plays to the crowd, emotes within the song and just sells the energy of every song far beyond what is expected from any performer. Butler again is absolutely convincing in every step of this, literal and otherwise. He does embody that presence so potently without again feeling the parody, he feels like we are seeing Elvis with the sheer power of his work here. It is remarkable and shouldn't be handwaved because of how much he makes it a given throughout the film. The one facet that Butler does not do is consistently sing as Elvis, though there is a bit of it, and Butler does a more than fine job if perhaps his vocals aren't as powerful as Elvis's (hence the dubbing), though seems like if they had just let him sing Butler would've been up to the task. As Butler really is everything he needs to be as this image of Elvis without question. He has that down, and I would say goes far beyond other similar performances that feel far more like impressions. Butler realizes the icon, as a icon, but he also is convincing just as a performer who came to be an icon. It is striking work that in no way seems ever less than he should be, and dances around any of the pitfalls that are so common with these sorts of performances.
But all that stage persona stuff can only amount to so much, as good as it might be if it all falls apart when he's off-stage. In a way, despite not being documented in the same way, Butler has to deliver a greater truth, when the film finally settles down enough to give Elvis a more in-person focus. And here is where I will again praise Butler, and again his evocation of Elvis truly is notable because he is as convincing when he is Elvis off stage. His manner is similar but less performative. However less performative in the right way. He still sounds like Elvis, and still has the manner of the man, but he's not playing for anyone, he's just being himself. Butler is convincing as Elvis the man, who is presented with largely a positive depiction of the man, however, working even within that context though Butler grants humanity that has greater depth alluded to even if not always explored. Butler in many ways succeeds because he does two things. When we see Elvis emote, it feels like Elvis emoting, but it also feels like a person emoting. He makes the essential jump to allow us to just believe him as Elvis, which on its own is quite an achievement. And again the emotions of many of these scenes are relatively simple, disappointment with his career at times, heartbreak over the death of his mother, and eventual romance with Priscilla. Butler brings the passion of the man towards music as sincerity. He brings a simple boy's sadness in the death of his mother and with Priscilla (Olivia DeJonge) just a lower key charm that is the stage Elvis however more modest, more genuine. Again while I don't think this is exactly exploring the deepest truths of Elvis, Butler is absolutely convincing in realizing what the film lets him present.
As per usual the biopic trudges along a bit as we see Elvis fall into personal anguish as the aimless artist, although we get this note twice over. And where Butler continues to excel even when the film gets a bit baggy in comparison. Butler's physical performance continues to be quite remarkable because he successfully transitions through each of Elvis's stages, which are all kind of iconic in their own way. That is he does become more restrained, though more passioned in some ways, with greater maturity in the man's voice, as Butler does really two impressions and both are convincing. Even the overweight Elvis late in the film, Butler modifies his work again to give that larger-than-life presence that has as much passion but is suffering far more from the literal and metaphorical weight of his life. We of course get some perfunctory biopic moments, such as the man pushing back his state of malaise to make a statement in his comeback special. Again while I don't think these scenes really are of too much note, Butler's performance combines a sense of frustration of standing still and the ferocity of finally releasing his passion more directly in his comeback song. Butler's portrayal of the slow demise of the man is well done. Just shows the man physically becoming so much less, everything including his charm and passion reducing in his eyes, with a greater frustration towards the duplicitous Colonel. Although the scenes are a little repetitive, Butler continues to thrive in bringing to life every phase of the man's life even the most painful, which the film treats with sort of a gentle pain in that it never gets as raw as it could in that regard. I suppose that is where my praise is limited in that the film never let's Butler go past a certain point, which is unfortunate, however still notable what Butler does even in the confines of the role. It is a challenge not to be a parody, it a challenge not to be underwhelming when portraying such a iconic pop culture figure, it is challenge not to seem too distant. Butler avoids all of that, he's convincing in bringing Elvis to life as the iconic star, but he's also convincing in bringing to Elvis to life as a man. Although I certainly think a greater film could've been made out of Elvis the man, I couldn't think of a better man to portray him than Butler based on his very strong performance here.
31 comments:
It seems like I might just have to get around to this, if only for Butler's performance.
Where I’m left cold and what ultimately soured me on his work here is Butler’s real-world persona apparently being permanently altered by this oh so serious performance of his, including the “permanent” voice change. Does anyone here really think it’s permanent? I think not. It’s probably just for 2022 awards season and if he loses the Oscar to Farrell or Butler, it’ll probably be gone the next week.
It’s as if he actually thinks he is Elvis. Sorry Austin but you’re not Daniel Day-Lewis or Robert De Niro, there’s no need to regurgitate the tired “method acting” trope. It’s very disappointing and unnecessarily egocentric.
But putting those qualms aside, Louis, this was a terrific review. Reads more like a 5 than a 4.5 to me, but I suppose the film’s detriments did impact this.
Excited for Fraser’s review now.
Good review, Louis, but the wrong kid die- I mean, yeah, Butler was pretty good. I feel like I'd appreciate his work more if I re-watched the movie, but I'm in no rush to do so.
Out of the last 12 Best Actor Oscar winners we've had, where would Butler rank for you if here were to win?
Easy 5 for me, actually. He's great throughout but I have to give him particular credit for the concert scenes where he so completely becomes Elvis I just straight up accepted that I was looking at the real thing, which is pretty amazing. I have to say also his work has had a surprising amount of staying power with me.
Nanou: I don't care about any of that. What's on the screen is what matters to me.
Nanou: I'm no singing expert, but I don't find it too hard to believe as a former metal vocalist. I've lost my ability to do certain kinds of screams after trying to emulate a different technique. I didn't really hurt myself as much as I found myself unable to scream like before after getting used to a different style.
If I were to guess with Butler's case, it might be more of a muscle memory thing than say, permanent vocal chords damage, but still.
Matt: I don’t begrudge you for that, but I can’t say the same. All I’ll say is at least Butler isn’t a murderer or rapist so there’s no real harm in watching his work.
Emi Grant:
#7 behind Hopkins, Dujardin, McConaughey, Affleck, DiCaprio and Day-Lewis (not in order).
Nanou:
I'd go easier on him personally, as other actors have spoken of accidentally losing their natural accents to roles before. Also I for one would love to see Elvis Feyd-Rautha.
Wasn't a big fan of the film (liked it more than I thought I would but still found the narrative to be incredibly generic and bland), but I was genuinely surprised by how much I liked him here. Especially given how hard it is to sell Elvis without coming off as a cartoon character, he really impressed and made it feel like I was watching the King himself, even though I'd agree he could've been all the better had the film given him better material.
It's a really good performance. I'd give him a 4. I thought the film limited his work. I'd rather see any of the other 4 win the Oscar. Butler's the safest choice to win because it's yet another biopic performance, and another music biopic at that.
I'm in no real rush to watch this film, to be perfectly honest. I'm not a huge fan of Luhrmann by any means, and I've likewise heard his take on Elvis could've been more critical. Related question: Can anyone here say if they mention Priscilla being underaged? That's one of the big "icky" things with Elvis, and I genuinely don't know if the film references it or not.
That said, I've heard nothing but praise for Butler here, as everywhere I look people are calling this one of the most uncanny impersonations of a pop star/singer in some time. And considering the only other performance of Butler's I've seen is Tex from OUATIH - that's quite a jump, so it's nice to hear that gamble paid off with many people.
Mitchell it doesn't cover that, but really I don't see any biopic covering that as it would kind of derail the whole thing. It's not going to get into that, particularly as Priscilla certainly has had plenty of time to paint that interaction more negatively and has chosen not to (despite divorcing Elvis in his lifetime), so for us to moralize about given only she knows if he did anything inappropriate, and hasn't said so, doesn't make a lot of sense.
Nanou: Any actor who plays such a prominent figure as Elvis would obviously do their homework on the man's voice, especially when there's hundreds of hours of voice samples available online (if not more). Also, people's voices do tend to change naturally over the years based on circumstances.
Great performance and I like the film a lot, too, though with reservations. Don't really have an issue if he wins though me feckin heart's with Farrell or Nighy. His off-screen voice thing is an overblown issue, it happens.
Mitchell: it mentions it very briefly in passing in an early scene then never again.
Good write-up, Louis. Like many of you, I can't call myself a fan of the film, but Butler is genuinely electrifying. Extraordinary transformation and, as Louis eloquently points out, is quite incredible in bringing to the forefront Presley's humanity, even though he's unfortunately bogged down by the writing. Much stronger than the myriad of biopic performances that are often nominated (and often win) in this category and, while there are a few better options for the Academy to give Best Actor to this year, I will have no qualms seeing Butler's stardom be coronated with an Oscar in March.
On the voice thing, I sort of find it refreshing to see an actor so committed to their role that it's had a permanent effect on their voice, instead of seeing them return to how they normally speak. (Absolutely no disrespect intended to the Gary Oldmans and Cate Blanchetts of the world, though.) Butler very clearly has committed super intensely to this transformation and his inability to drop Elvis's voice is so clearly a testament to just how much effort the guy has put into this unbelievable transformation.
Great work from a new star. Hope he delivers in Dune: Part II.
I guess Fraser is being reviewed last.
On the accent thing, I guess I have a simple take...
If I spent 1-2 years studying someone's specific way of talking/presenting themselves, it would be very hard to drop. Even if it's a slight act on his part, Butler may honestly prefer talking in his new voice, so I don't exactly blame him for trying to keep it going. Indeed, I don't find my own voice anything special (I've had recent troubles with articulation/certain sounds, but also I just have a relatively "plain" Great Lakes accent), so if I had the chance to try something new I'd commit myself as well.
Your top 10 Musician biopics?
Anonymous:
1. Amadeus (duh)
2. The Pianist
3. Topsy Turvy
4. I'm Not There
5. Love & Mercy
6. Coal Miner's Daughter
7. Sid & Nancy
8. Yankee Doodle Dandy
9. Bound for Glory
10. The Buddy Holly Story
I kind of admire that this movie stares Walk Hard straight in the face and says "Yeah, so what?"
Absolutely loved Turning Red. Very refreshing change to Pixar's formula, but just a great movie on it's own.
Chiang-4
Oh-4
Morse and Park-3
Ramakrishnan-3.5
Lee-3.5
Wai Ching Ho-3.5
Louis: Your thoughts on these scenes https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=c5gfCEk_zLE https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hfIuQ5KdhFM
He's nevertheless a 5 for me. Even if the movie doesn't amount to a whole lot except for Luhrmann's typical visuals, Butler still completely disappears into the role and I wouldn't mind if he were to emerge as a winner.
Sidenote: I have no idea why people have been making such a fuss about his voice, frankly.
An electrifying performance, that's all I will say.... Loved it a lot. As for the voice thing, I can actually relate with the guy, cause I don't think that's intentional. Has happened with me during my teenage years when I started singing. If you have put a lot of time and practice into emulating someone, it might affect you for a while.
Louis: who do you think was 6th place in Director, and the acting categories?
If I had to hazard a guess,
Berger
Sandler
Deadwyler (sigh)
Redmayne
De Leon
whenever i hear or read something about a Baz Luhrmann film, i always have to think about that quote from Cloud Atlas about how the silence between the notes is the key to every music.
If this guy had the same reasoning with editing, i might have the slightest degree of interest in this film. Seriously, shots are allowed to hold for longer than a second, nobody would mind!
Calvin:
Berger
Cruise
Deadwyler
Dano
De Leon
Louis: Your thoughts on the voices of Song Kang-Ho, Lee Byung-Hun and Choi Min-sik.
Anonymous:
The first scene is just great simple acting of just showing the eventual breakdown of Kim who has basically been living in this emotional bubble that powerfully breaks in that moment.
I mean the scene that gives purpose to Burnett's casting where you see the change being so remarkable to the sunny woman who really does have enough, and likable manner only exists so far. Burnett playing the scene honestly as someone just trying to deal with this sudden break in what was her reality. Odenkirk is also great in the scene in playing two different cons the first as the charming man who wants to help her son, then as the brutal criminal attempting to be something he never was, which the change in him is great as you see her face fall and the real Jimmy reveals himself as he doesn't go the next step.
Calvin:
Director: Probably Berger, based on All Quiet's overall haul.
Actor: Sandler, I guess, however, I'd guess Mescal on had considerably lower totals than Nighy upwards, so I think several candidates probably were all close together.
Actress: Deadwyler indeed, with de Armas having been #3 all along (never count out icon votes I guess).
Supporting Actor: Leaning towards Dano due to the SAG support, with The Fabelmans doing well but not quite well enough to get Dano in.
Supporting Actress: I'd say those five, in the end, were probably very solid, however probably De Leon based on Triangle getting into picture.
8000's:
Song has such a charmingly goofy voice.
Lee's voice is really that of the classic stoic type, that unlike most translated even to English (it's a shame Hollywood wasted him).
Choi is a fittingly pretty all over the place and really for the lack of a better word, crazy voice.
Louis: Can you rank your top 10 best Song Kang Ho's perfomances (lead and support)?
Post a Comment