Wednesday 9 December 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1970: James Fox in Performance

James Fox did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Chas in Performance. 

Performance is a curious, occasionally overly stylized film, about a violent gangster hiding out from his mob at the home of a faded rocker. 

James Fox, much like his older brother, is most often cast as upper crust English of a certain type. Much like his brother's most famous role The Jackal, we have there a strict departure from that. This is quite evident, in more ways than one, in the the fever dream opening of the film where we get a taste for his Chas in rather lurid detail. This as we hear Fox's distinct cockney accent he brings to the role. Something that he makes wholly natural and helps to detach himself entirely from his typical screen presence. Fox does more than the accent there's a darkness within it. An intensity by itself that creates not only the sense of a less upper class sort, but also the mark of a man whose defined within a darker side of life. This is seen all the more evident when we witness him in a dalliance. This where he enjoys strangulation within the act that we see a vile sadistic glee carry across Fox's face as he shows the nature of Chas. We see a similar manner though as we see him work his way within the mob. Fox's carries himself admirably in granting both a sense of a personal style, while also carrying that certain gaze within his eyes of a killer. This in Fox presenting a man who carries himself as though he is a slick businessman of some kind, while just the brutal thug that is the truth of the man is festering underneath the very thin carpet. 

We see this as Fox portrays a particularly pointed intensity of the man as he quick to ridicule in both hateful words and violence. This quickly leading him to be violently accosted by a superior and his men. This which Chas manages to escape by shooting the man. An actual key scene within Fox's performance. This being the enjoyment that comes across his eyes. This removing any of the quiet darkness, to rather reveal the more vile bliss the man finds within the act of violence. This though leads Chas both to become infamous within the world but also within his organization that wants him taken out due to the action. In order to avoid death he finds a flat he can stay in with the faded rocker Turner (Mick Jagger). Fox being terrific in creating the false face of the man, being technically more like the typical presence of his performances, as he attempts to look like a well to do British gentlemen. Fox is terrific though by presenting that even in these acts it is this sort of fight within himself. This in these slight contortions almost of his expression that shows the violent fiend, between his overly light way of speaking that "he's artist" simply looking somewhere to stay. There's a marvelous moment where we have the true Chas speaking on the phone to an accomplish, while also fielding questions from one of the residents. Fox switching from an affable enough voice to the resident, while immediately becoming himself to the accomplish. This not only in the timbre, but the very way he exudes a certain darkness out of himself by nature, when being himself. 
 
The film at this point however gets into basically a drug induced haze for an extended period, overly extended I'd say. Fox is good in these scenes though in presenting Chas forced out of his comfort zone in the antics of Tuner and his "secretary" Pherber (Anita Pallenberg). This in showing both the man without control in his manner as he's lost within the haze of it, but also the discomfort when prompted to participate. This slowly segues towards his state as a kind of haze that Fox presents though with less of an overt unease. This as we briefly seem to see a satiated man, albeit briefly. The film then really kind of loses itself to style, and doesn't really devise anything to remarkable in that extent nonetheless. This particularly since there is an instant whiplash on the concept of Chas perhaps changing through the experience, well other than the wholly random and rather laughable "what does it mean" ending to the film. Still Fox does deliver on his end in creating a compelling portrayal of a brutal criminal. Although this idea gets lost just as the film does, Fox still manages to stay above water in maintaining the character even as the film loses its mind purposefully. It stands on its own as a strong performance, and best that it was given that the film and the experience evidently helped to contribute to Fox abandoning film acting for six years. 

69 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Rating and thoughts on Mick Jagger.

Roger Parma said...

1. Williamson
2. Robards
3. Harris
4. Fox
5. Sellers

Michael McCarthy said...

I actually thought the very stylized direction worked well for the drugged out scenes, the problem for me was that same stylization was present from the very beginning of the film, making it less striking in the scenes where it was appropriate.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Hey guys!
Tell us your ranks of 1994 nominees in each category:

Song
1. "Till Love Touches Your Life" - Madron
2. "Thank You Very Much" - Scrooge
3. "Whistling Away the Dark" - Darling Lili
4. "For All We Know" - Lovers and Other Strangers
5. "Pieces of Dreams" - Pieces of Dreams

Adapted Score
1. Scrooge
2. A Boy Named Charlie Brown
3. Let It Be
4. Darling Lili
5. The Baby Maker

Original Score
1. Love Story
2. Patton
3. Sunflower
4. Cromwell
5. Airport

Sound
1. Patton
2. Ryan's Daughter
3. Tora! Tora! Tora!
4. Woodstock
5. Airport

Editing
1. MASH
2. Patton
3. Woodstock
4. Tora! Tora! Tora!
5. Airport

Special Visual Effects
1. Tora! Tora! Tora!
2. Patton

Costume
1. Cromwell
2. Scrooge
3. Darling Lili
4. The Hawaiians
5. Airport

Art Direction
1. Scrooge
2. Patton
3. The Molly Maguires
4. Airport
5. Tora! Tora! Tora!

Cinematography
1. Ryan's Daughter
2. Patton
3. Tora! Tora! Tora!
4. Women in Love
5. Airport

International Film
1. Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion
2. First Love
3. Tristana
I couldn't watch Hoa-Binh and Peace Over the Fields

Adapted Screenplay
1. MASH
2. I Never Sang for My Father
3. Women in Love
4. Lovers and Other Strangers
5. Airport

Original Screenplay
1. My Night at Maud's
2. Five Easy Pieces
3. Patton
4. Joe
5. Love Story

Supporting Actress
1. Karen Black
2. Lee Grant
3. Helen Hayes
4. Sally Kellerman
5. Maureen Stapleton

Supporting Actor
1. John Mills
2. Gene Hackman
3. Chief Dan George
4. John Marley
5. Richard S. Castellano

Lead Actress
1. Sarah Miles
2. Ali MacGraw
3. Glenda Jackson
4. Carrie Snodgress
5. Jane Alexander

Lead Actor
1. Jack Nicholson
2. George C. Scott
3. Melvyn Douglas
4. James Earl Jones
5. Ryan O'Neal

Director
1. Robert Altman
2. Franklin J. Schaffner
3. Federico Fellini
4. Ken Russell
5. Arthur Hiller

Picture
1. MASH (please Louis give the film and Altman a second chance)
2. Five Easy Pieces
3. Patton
4. Love Story
5. Airport

And what are your ranks?

Shaggy Rogers said...

Correction "Tell us your ranks of 1970 nominees in each category"

Tim said...

Louis: what are some actors that you think would be fitting for Ebenezer Scrooge played nowadays, preferably some that have not already?


I was thinking about the likes of
Dustin Hoffman
Ian McKellan
definitely Geoffrey Rush
F. Murray Abraham
Liam Neeson
Ben Kingsley
J. K. Simmons
Jonathan Pryce
not entirely sure about Tommy Lee Jones

and i was thinking someone like Ciaran Hinds or Ian McShane could be interesting as for someone who wouldn't know the story (let us just pretend someone like that existed, for the fun of it) the change would not be seen coming at all

Robert MacFarlane said...

Tim: Bill Nighy, easily.

Calvin Law said...

Issey Ogata

Bryan L. said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Bryan L. said...

Tim: For a Spanish-language version, I’d like to see Damian Alcazars’ take on it, if you have him sort-of start from his character in The Perfect Dictatorship.

Calvin Law said...

I’m gonna sit this predictions out and watch it play out from the sidelines, so to speak.

Calvin Law said...

Incidentally James’ son Laurence is one of the biggest most irrelevant cunts in British media right now. And quite talentless. The apple does fall far from the tree sometimes.

Matt Mustin said...

Tim: Mark Rylance, but he's gonna be my suggestion for everything, I think.

Robert MacFarlane said...

*Googles Laurence Fox*

Huh, I guess every country has their own Scott Baio.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Jagger - 4(A good performance on its own terms. Jagger is able to deliver the right type of intangible charisma needed for the part even as he's in a kind of daze the whole time. Jagger's though good in having an incisiveness within really his calm sort of beatnik demeanor that carries its own kind of intensity that effectively contrasts against what Fox is doing.)

Michael:

I will say because of that approach, I pretty numb to it by time it would've been earned.

Tim:

I will co-sign on Matt's choice, as I'd love to see whatever his interpretation would be.

Calvin Law said...

Jagger is the kind of performer I'd like to see work with say, a David Lynch, who could really turn something special out of him.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: any chance of Trevor Howard going up for Ryan's Daughter?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Given that you love Ryan's Daughter, could I have your thoughts on this interview with David Lean regarsing the contemporary critical reaction to it?

https://youtu.be/QvB-u7vVZus

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

*regarding

Mitchell Murray said...

In reference to my previous comments, I've now completed the second and third seasons of "The Seven Deadly Sins" (Side Note: The second "season" only has four episodes, so it could really be viewed as a pre-cursor to the third). Overall, there is a noticeable improvement over the first season, not so much in terms of action since that's always been a strength of the show, but in regards to storytelling. For one thing, they do thankfully cut back on the "fanservice" (at least, to a degree), which helps to establish a more consistent tone. Beyond that, there's also a greater level of stakes and character development shown throughout, which in spite of it's few contrivances, are still delivered upon much of the time.

Luke Higham said...

Michael McCarthy and Calvin: Would you be willing to watch The Confession with Yves Montand and Simone Signoret. I'm really curious to know your thoughts on them. I would myself if I could but got much greater priorities at the moment that are Non-blog related.

Luke Higham said...

Michael: Your ratings for Bourvil, Montand and Volonte in Le Cercle Rouge

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your 1940s cast & director for The Paper?

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this trailer https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LcDQqGJG8pA

Michael Patison said...

Calvin: I saw the Laurence Fox stuff and was pretty depressed about it (at least more so than I am whenever I read about some new hateful asshole). I quite like Lewis and him in it, so seeing all this is annoying. Also, how was Billie Piper dumb enough to marry him? He must've always been like this.

Mitchell Murray said...

I don't remember if we've covered this question before, but what's everyone's ranking for the 2004 supporting fields? Mine would be as followed:

Actor:

1) Church (4.5)
2) Owen (4)
3) Alda (3)
4) Foxx (2.5)
5) Freeman (2.5)

Actress:

1) Madsen (4.5)
2) Blanchett (3.5)
3) Okonedo (3)
4) Portman (2)

Haven't seen Linney, and based on the film's subject/reception, I'm not sure I really want to.

Calvin Law said...

Michael: He proudly stated once that in arguments with Piper, he would yell 'cut' at her to put arguments to an end. He thrives off the misogynistic racist identity he's crafted for himself that seems to have scarily spoken to a lot of people.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Mitchell:

1. Owen (4.5/5)
2. Foxx (3.5)
3. Freeman (3.5)
4. Church (2.5)

I haven’t seen Aviator in 15 years. Don’t even remember Alda.

1. Madsen (4)
2. Portman (3/3.5)
3. Linney (2.5)

Haven’t seen Hotel Rwanda. Vaguely remember linking Blanchett, but it’s too hazy a memory.


In other news, every single Disney announcement today makes me fear Capitalism more than I already did. I feel like brain shrunk centimeter by centimeter with each new piece of “content”. When they conquer some small island nations and declare themselves People’s Republic of the Mouse, don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Calvin Law said...

Mitchell:

1. Owen
2. Foxx
3. Freeman
4. Church
5. Alda

Like them all.

1. Madsen
2. Okonedo (easy 4.5 for me)
3. Blanchett
4. Portman
5. Finney

1) Church (4.5)
2) Owen (4)
3) Alda (3)
4) Foxx (2.5)
5) Freeman (2.5)

Mitchell Murray said...

Robert: Only a 2.5 for Church? Wasn't expecting that, I'll be honest. When it comes to current Disney, though, I'm right there with you friend. Makes me even more nostalgic for the likes of "Hunchback" and "Mulan" (The 98' version, obviously).

Calvin: Frankly, I never got the praise for Okonedo. She's fine in her supporting role, but I still think Cheadle thoroughly overshadows her.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Mitchell: I honestly found him irritating to the point where I was thankful whenever he was off screen. Truthfully I think 2.5 is me being generous since the character was written that way.

Mitchell Murray said...

Robert: To each their own, I suppose. I personally lean far more towards Louis' rating and thoughts, as I found Church quite endearing in what could've been a very unlikable role. What really helps him for me is that I fully bought Jack and Mile's relationship, and the chemistry between Church and Giamatti. For myself, there was a supportiveness and genuine (albeit misguided) attempts by Jack to cheer up his friend, which Church handled extremely well. His way of playing Jack as this teenager in an adult's body completely worked for me, right down to the looks he gives Miles as he explains how to sip wine. Even when Jack does some amoral things, I could still access the character because of Church, and because he made Jack so short sighted, yet weirdly earnest in the right situations.

I'll also admit...the scene where Jack charges towards some golfers like a drugged out ape still cracks me up to this day.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Jagger would be ideal for Lynch.

Probably not.

Tahmeed:

The whole situation about Ryan's Daughter has a whole lot to it. This as it isn't entirely true that Lean didn't make a film for 14 years because it, he also struggled to get his version of the Bounty off the ground, though I do think that disheartening experience could've pushed him to be less motivated to get it off the ground in some way.

Now just based on a personal view, I don't agree with the critics about the film. It is not Brief Encounter, Bridge on The River Kwai or Lawrence of Arabia but few films are. This is as it has flaws unlike those films. Having said that, I find there is so much to love about the film actually through the grand scale that Lean gives it. This in how alive the setting feels because of it, and how he depicts certain sequences, for example Mitchum trailing the affair "crime scene" is one of my favorite bits of direction from Lean period. The idea that it should've been smaller, feels like a criticism for the sake of it, or a specific one for the sake of what Lean was doing that few filmmakers would dare to do, or could do, in terms of scale. At the simplest point though, the truth is we've seen Lean tell the small scale version, twice, extremely successfully with Brief Encounter, less so with Passionate Friends, why not see something...you know different...

Of course, the bigger thing though is even if you don't like Ryan's Daughter, which is fine if you don't, to treat it as a cinematic atrocity, and to basically berate Lean (as those critics did), is simply nonsensical. Of course this is ongoing though where you have critics, who have less individual power now then they did then, who will take a sadistic pleasure in attacking "golden boys". Take the reception to Live By Night for a modern example, or even something like Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou, which that film's reception seems to be an artifact of that behavior, as a decade later that film is not considered the nadir of Anderson, rather though it was the point the critics decided to "tear him a new one"....you know because.

I will say Pauline Kael, who certainly knew how to write prose, is someone who both gave critics a name, but also gave them a bad name. This with the certain ego that existed in her reviews in particular in the vicious almost personal attacks on filmmakers she deemed lesser than. Although so many of her reviews are articulate, her admonishments though sometimes sound more intelligent than they are. The recently quoted review of Gena Rowlands in A Woman Under the Influence that "nothing she does is memorable, because she does so much", seems to cut deep, but it doesn't actually add up to an actual truth. Although I suppose she received her own comeuppance of a sort for her callous treatment of Lean shortly afterwards with what happened with "Raising Kane" though honestly her bad journalism there didn't tarnish her reputation probably as much as it should've.

Sorry for all that, but everything around Ryan's Daughter's critical reception elicits much passion from me.

Anonymous:

Looks like more fun to be had with the series, though I wished they had left the Chozen reveal to be seen, though from the looks of it, it will probably be a one episode excursion I imagine.

Bryan:

The Paper 1940's directed by Billy Wilder:

Henry Hackett: James Cagney
Bernie White: Walter Huston
Alicia Clark: Barbara Stanwyck
Martha Hackett: Paulette Goddard
McDougal: Karl Malden
Graham Keightley: Lionel Barrymore
Sandusky: Phil Silvers
Paul Bladden: Charles Coburn

Bryan L. said...

1. Williamson
2. Robards
3. Sellers
4. Harris
5. Fox

Matt Mustin said...

RIP "Tiny" Lister. I always liked it when he popped up in something.

RatedRStar said...

Ryan's Daughter is one of the those films where I feel the Academy actually did a good job recognising easily my favourite film of 1970 considering the mixed reception it got.

Tim said...

Mitchell:

1) Church (4.5)
2) Owen (3.5/4)
3) Foxx (3)
4) Alda (2.5)
5) Freeman (2/2.5)


Have not seen Linney yet


1) Madsen (4.5)
2) Okenodo (4.5)
3) Blanchett (3.5)
4) Portman (2)

Omar Franini said...

1. Williamson
2. Harris
3. Robards
4. Sellers
5. Fox

Anonymous said...

Michael, your thoughts on Harris, Williamson and Robards in their respective films.

Mitchell Murray said...

Another question for everyone: Who would you cast in a 2010s (or I guess, 2020s now) version of "Red Eye"?

Lisa: Mary Elizabeth Winstead (Let it be known, she's my immediate go to for thriller heroines)
Jackson: Daniel Bruhl

Calvin Law said...

Louis: thoughts on this Always Sunny scene? https://youtu.be/nzoxSohbzWo

BRAZINTERMA said...

RIP Kim Ki-duk

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Whenever you do finish The Queen's Gambit, could I have your thoughts on the series, Taylor-Joy and the rest of the cast's performances.

Anonymous said...

Luke & Louis, your 10 most anticipated films of 2021 (Post-February).

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: In the hope they are released in 2021.
1. The Northman
2. Dune
3. The Tragedy Of Macbeth
4. The French Dispatch
5. Soggy Bottom
6. Killers Of The Flower Moon
7. The Last Duel
8. Last Night In Soho
9. Next Goal Wins
10. The Way Of The Wind
HM: The Green Knight, Blonde and Annette

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If you're doing a list as well, may I have your reasons on the picks you've chosen.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

Will do.

Calvin:

Hilarious scene but also strangely heartwarming as well. Absolutely impeccably performed by Howerton.

Anonymous:

1. Soggy Bottom
2. Dune
3. The Tragedy of Macbeth
4. Babylon
5. The Northman
6. Killers of the Flower Moon
7. Next Goal Wins
8. The French Dispatch
9. The Green Knight
10. Blonde

Luke Higham said...

Forgot Babylon, that's also in my honourable mentions.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Soggy Bottom - (PTA nuff said)

Dune - (I mean enough had been said I think.)

The Tragedy of Macbeth - (McDormand and Washington doing Shakespeare seems enough of a reason, but throw in a Coen, and that's far more than enough.)

Babylon - (Chazelle has done no wrong in my book, so of course I'm anticipating it.)

The Northman - (I mean Eggers doing another idiosyncratic setting is already more than enough, I mean just looking forward to the visuals alone.)

Killers of the Flower Moon - (Scorsese is enough, the subject matter doesn't scream "Scorsese" is the only reason it's lower.)

Next Goal Wins - (Another Waititi film is enough, the subject matter, plus potential Fassbender redemption only helps things more.)

The French Dispatch - (Liked the trailer, Andersonx2 has never done me wrong.)

The Green Knight - (Loved the trailer, and have liked all of Lowery's films. Also have to give it to Dev Patel, he's completely turned me around on him.)

Blonde - (The reason it is #10 is because of the release troubles. Then again "Jesse James" had similar issues finding release, so who knows. I'd say though right now Dominick could be a Curtis Hansen, that is while he makes other good films, he really just had one masterpiece in him. Still, I'm interested to see him go up to bat once again.)

Bryan L. said...

Luke: Your Top Ten films for 1994, plus your Director & Acting wins.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Does Bradley Cooper get 5 with Soggy Bottom? For me, he already had 5 with A Star Is Born.

Anonymous said...

Louis, I was wondering, would you ever consider doing a write-up of Ewan McGregor's best work in The Ghost Writer.

Tim said...

Anonymous: 2010 already went through its second round, so you should not bet on it. But of course you can request a bonus review

Matt Mustin said...

Shaggy: Well, we should probably wait til the movie comes out, right?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I think that performance does deserve to be talked about further though best ask Louis after the rounds are completely finished.

Mitchell Murray said...

Shaggy: I also gave Cooper a 5 for "A Star is Born", but I can at least understand why Louis wasn't quite as enamored with the performance.

Anonymous: I, for one, wouldn't be opposed to a review for McGregor, even though I'd say it's my third/fourth favourite performance of his.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your ranking of the 1985 Oscar-nominated lead & supporting actresses

Luke Higham said...

Bryan: My top ten is more or less the same with the exceptions of Hoop Dreams and In The Heat Of The Sun (Have yet to see both) and I'd probably put Leon: The Professional and La Reine Margot in there.

Picture: The Shawshank Redemption
Director: Tarantino
Actor: Jackson
Actress: Owen
Supporting Actor: Landau
Supporting Actress: Kerr-Bell

Anonymous said...

1. Harris
2. Robards
3. Williamson
4. Sellers
5. Fox

Mitchell Murray said...

Everyone: What are your thoughts on this in terms of animation and/or music?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHBDJIbL-14

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Mitchell: That was a match up I never knew I needed until I'd received it. The animation is pretty great in bringing the action come to life, and the voice acting was also spot on. Great stuff.

John Smith said...

Louis, your thoughts on the episode franks little beauties from its always sunny in Philadelphia. The future of patriotism segment from the episode killed me.

Mitchell Murray said...

Tahmeed: The show has two more episodes left in it's current season, and that's still my favourite fight they've done all year.

I would greatly recommend watching the full episode, along with some of the show's other match ups. Some of my other recent favourites include...

Ghost Rider Vs Lobo
Sasuke Vs Hiei
Mob Vs Tatsumaki
All Might Vs Might Guy
Genos Vs War Machine
Goro Vs Machamp
Beerus Vs Sailor Galaxia

Luke Higham said...

Michael McCarthy: Your thoughts on The Molly Maguires.

Anonymous said...

In 2020 I managed to watch most of the films from 1970. Trevor Howard wins in supporting actor.

Bryan L. said...

Luke: Thanks, regarding 1994.

Bryan L. said...

To anyone that has seen The Molly Maguires, am I missing something with Harris? Don’t get me wrong; I thought he was quite good, but I felt the film & his character as written didn’t reach their full potential.

I was able to find an online copy of Hoffman and thought Sellers was very good. His performance there felt more integral to that film than Harris with his. That’s my take on it though, and I’m open to any rebuttals.

Luke Higham said...

Bryan: You and Calvin are on the same boat, I really want to know Michael's thoughts on him.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your top 20 geoffrey rush acting moments