Tuesday 22 December 2020

Alternate Best Actor 1970: Richard Harris in The Molly Maguires

Richard Harris did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Detective James McPharlan/James McKenna in The Molly Maguires. 

The Molly Maguires is a good though not great film (and the subject matter/scenario implies that possibility) about a detective infiltrating a criminal gang of discontented Irish miners in Pennsylvania.
 
I'll be honest going into this film the first time I honestly expected a reversal of the roles. This being with Sean Connery as the infiltrating policeman and Richard Harris as the Irish radical. That's not the case though an interesting reversal of expectations against the actors' more typical presences. Harris though gets an alternative towards the potentially more wild role as the quiet detective carefully infiltrating the organization by first coming to town like any old immigrant. This is where we perhaps get a little more expected Harris with the first thing he does is getting into a fight. Harris is always game to that kind of intensity though that isn't the truth of the character, and even this instance is portrayed by him as very much minor within the nature of his James. Where we get more of the man actually is where we follow him immediately after that where he meets with his police contact. This is where we see Harris's overarching approach in this role which is a very quiet and internalized performance from him. This as we initially see him speaking towards his handler, that which he puts no great joy in remarking on the duty. Initially rather Harris just carries himself with a sort of professional distance within the situation. Speaking towards it without pleasure, but without an exact conflict. Harris rather initially depicts the professional within James as he goes about his task. 

We follow then James as he goes about his infiltration of the group by essentially making himself seem like the most normal of men in the situations. Harris is good in playing the part of James playing the part, not as this major facade but rather the man James would be if he weren't a detective. The tell really being almost entirely within Harris's eyes that carry with them an incisiveness in certain moments as he attempts to decipher where he can find his path into the Molly Maguires led by Connery's "Black Jack" Kehoe. Otherwise we see James living his life as a miner and there Harris excels within his work as the quiet leading man. This in just presenting a charm, though tempered for Harris, in his moments with a local religious woman Mary (Samantha Eggar). This in creating an earnest kind of chemistry between them. This where we perhaps see the real James in these effectively tender moments in which the two share their seemingly modest dreams outside of the dismal living. In the community Harris doesn't project James being a leader, but rather seemingly just a good man looking for a path. This after one test after another by Cohoe's men, these tests that James beats again through a modest consistency. Harris again portraying well just the calm demeanor of the man who is doing his job well by mostly not making a great deal of noise and just gradually making his way into the organization of the Molly Maguires. 

Within this though we see as the further James infiltrates the further there is a sense of empathy for the plight of the men. Harris is terrific in presenting this certain shame that grows in his performance and a certain underlying passion when he states a certain understanding of the men's discontent. Harris offering a certain almost academic manner of the man still firmly doing his job as detective but with a sense of concern for the nature of what forces every man, even himself, to go to such extremes for his own livelihood. When he does infiltrate the organization then Harris portrays James as both working against them but also trying to save them. This in delivering a real passion in the moment of speaking so calmly an urging to not take risky maneuvers and to avoid bringing the law against them. This while showing not a hint of satisfaction when he maintains his position as spy within the ranks of the organization. Eventually this resolves with the men being arrested and sentenced to be executed. I will say this is where the flaws of the film are felt, the biggest one being that Connery's Black Jack I think should've been on more even footing as a lead with a more substantial connection between him and James. The biggest reason for this is the best scene of the film is the final one where we really emphasize this relationship which sadly wasn't given enough time to it. Harris though makes the most of the scene. This as he delivers a powerful sense of empathy in his eyes, but there is also still this certain urge for understanding. This as he speaks with an broken camaraderie. This as he speaks with warmth on their old times together, but a sadness around this. This as Harris conveys the idea of James not exactly knowing what to do with the man he did call friend. He grants the sense of that friendship but also articulates the right modest passion when he tries to understand why Jack didn't stop despite James trying to save him. When Jack finally pushes him though Harris reveals a greater depression in James for what came about his task. This as Harris naturally segues this to a bit of hostility, sensibly as Jack literally attacks him. The hostility though that he paints with a painful shade of grey as man aware both are victims of the same system. Frankly this scene should've gone on for longer, however the strength of the moment suggests what is missing within the rest of the film. This in truly exploring the relationship between both men and really their ideologies on how to escape their plight, one with the system the other against it. Still Harris provides a strong anchor for the film here and really delivers as much as he can within the confines of the piece. It's a very good performance, I just wish the film was a bit more dynamic of a piece overall for him to work with.

115 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Have you seen A Man called Horse.

Bryan L. said...

Louis and Mitchell: Thank you.

Luke Higham said...

It makes me a little sad that this is going to be his last review.

Luke Higham said...

I hope Guinness is next.

Mitchell Murray said...

Louis: Overall, what would be your thoughts on Peter Stormare as an actor?

I'll admit, this question is mostly related to me watching "Swedish Dicks" (Not porn related, I swear), which I'm finding fairly enjoyable, if incredibly lightweight.

John Smith said...

Hahahaha i love that show Louis. That show is funny if you watch as swede. Lots of funny references to swedish culturw.

Anonymous said...

Anyone watched Midnight Sky?

Louis Morgan said...

Midnight Sky is if you ever wanted The Road, The Martian, Logan and Gravity all mixed together into one bland paste of a film. Take any interesting aspects from those films and purge anything of note, and you have Midnight Sky. Bland characters (the little girl companion being mute pretty much sums it up), boring action scenes, an underdeveloped scenario and some rather wonky effects, it has it all. Also that twist...just awful.

Luke:

Connery - 4(Again the character isn't given really enough moments to define himself beyond his final scene. Connery is good the rest of the time in offering a lower key version of his typical charisma to create a believable dogged if somewhat hopeless leader of a cause. He's great though in his final scene though as it is the one scene he gets to sink his teeth into and he doesn't waste it. This in realizing both a moment of really a sense of the character's own understanding that his cause itself was likely going to be a failure though still the passion for it. He's best in his final moment in Harris in so naturally realizing the greater more violent discontent in the man as he lashes out.)

Eggar - 3(Gives a fine portrayal of essentially no more than the "love interest", this mainly as she has a nice chemistry with Harris even if it doesn't amount to much.)

Thought everyone else was fine if not overly distinctive.

Yes.

Mitchell:

Well of course Fargo is the best expression of his abilities that both being his sort of comedic deadpan, and his killers kind of menace he can bring out. Everything else I've seen him in has been working within either side of that variation. Whether that be a more overtly brutish or a bit more overtly comedic, or some mix of the two. He's always reliable with either cause, though typically far from the pinnacle example of it. Still always a welcome presence if at time underused (I always back to things like the Last Stand and ask "Why wasn't he just the main villain?").

Bryan L. said...

Louis & Luke: O’Toole and Harris as the two leads in a 60s UK The Departed?

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

YES, with Harris as the Good Cop, O'Toole as the bad one.

Luke Higham said...

Bryan: Completely agree.

Matthew Montada said...

Louis: thoughts and ratings for the cast of The Midnight Sky?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Could you check out Soldier Blue (1970).

Louis Morgan said...

Matthew:

Clooney - 3.5(His performance is the only thing I even remotely connected with in the film. This even as devised it is like the most simplified version of a character like this. Nonetheless Clooney managed to deliver some substance within his portrayal of depression that segues towards dogged conviction. This portraying well more than anything the physical needs of the part and the idea of the emotional desperation that drives his character. Although the character is far too limited for him to really develop it into anything particularly interesting it is a good performance.)

Jones, Oyelowo, Bichir, Boone, Chandler - 2.5(Now none of them are actively bad but I didn't care about their forgettable characters at any point. They are all there, they read their lines with enough of a convincing quality, but there is nothing even remotely memorable about their performances. Even their big emotional moments feel pretty muted and standard. Chandler for example has a scene which really should've called for a more McConaughey in Interstellar style
reaction, but instead we get a pretty modest reaction all things considered. All of them honestly give these rather "content" performances and that is a major problem as none of the characters are at all interesting leaving their straight forward performances equally boring. )
Luke:

Maybe, however several other films have priority over it first.

Matt Mustin said...

Remember when George Clooney had a really promising directing career ahead of him? What happened there?

Anonymous said...

Louis what would be your TV top fives for this year?

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

A good question, it's been all downhill since Good Night and Good Luck.

Anonymous:

Series:

1. The Last Dance
2. Better Call Saul
3. The Queen's Gambit (Just finished it)
4. What We Do in the Shadows
5. Fargo

Actor:

1. Bob Odenkirk - Better Call Saul
2. Matt Berry - What We Do in the Shadows
3. Nicholas Hoult - The Great
4. Ben Mendelsohn - The Outsider
5. Hubert Point-Du Jour - The Good Lord Bird

Actress:

1. Rhea Seehorn - Better Call Saul
2. Anya Taylor-Joy - The Queen's Gambit
3. Elle Fanning - The Great
4. Natasia Demetriou - What We Do in the Shadows

(Have seen others but wouldn't nominate them for anything, even to fill a list.)

Supporting Actor:

1. Ethan Hawke - The Good Lord Bird
2. Tony Dalton - Better Call Saul
3. Ben Whishaw - Fargo
4. Jack Huston - Fargo
5. Timothy Olyphant - Fargo

Supporting Actress:

1. Jessie Buckley - Fargo
2. Marielle Heller - The Queen's Gambit
3. Julianne Nicholson - The Outsider
4. Phoebe Fox - The Great
5. Maya Hawke - The Good Lord Bird

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on The Queen's Gambit, The Great, The Outsider, The Good Lord Bird and The Last Dance with thoughts on the casts for the first 4.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Where would the performances of Hoult, Mendelsohn, Taylor-Joy and Fanning rank in their respective careers.

Luke Higham said...

Not taking THOTKG and Babyteeth into account.

Anonymous said...

Louis, where would Hawke's work rank in his career.

John Smith said...

I loved Hoult in the great. He was really great portraying this manchild who mistakes love for obedience and respect for fear.

Calvin Law said...

Surprised Jordan didn’t make it into your Lead lineup. Think he’d take that personally.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Is Hoult still in The Great by the end of season 1.

Anonymous said...

Luke, Your predictions for the official and alternate lineups for Supporting Actor.

Luke Higham said...

Official
Leslie Odom Jr.
Daniel Kaluuya
Sacha Baron Cohen
Paul Raci
Stanley Tucci

Alternate
Laurie/Whishaw
Diggs/Groff
Hoult
Mendelsohn
Rylance
Dennehy
Larsen

I could see Louis going the 1/2 extra reviews route, as he did with 99.

If Larsen doesn't make it then Diggs/Groff will take the bonus slot.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

The Queen's Gambit is very much a sevenish hour film just in terms of production value and overall approach within the story of the chess player very much as the sports movie. This in intertwining it between one's challenges of personal demons and isolation, and those factors being the more important qualities in the end. Wasn't surprising to learn that the book was written by the same writer as the hustler. This as it very much takes a similar approach in the exploration of character as involved with a particular game. This one far more uplifting than that story, and effectively so. It earns its length just by spending time with the details and creating a vibrant world Beth inhabits, even as it stays with her consistently and her personal arc.

Taylor-Joy - (She continues only to impress once again, and is really creating quite the series of remarkable performances (apparently New Mutants aside). This is very much a performance where one can admire the form of the character and Taylor-Joy granting so much honesty towards every step of Beth's journey. This as Taylor-Joy is particularly impressive in that she is entirely convincing in being the teenage Beth with the shyness within the character's and the more repressed internalized state. This though in naturally progressing the character's maturity both just as a woman but also as this kind of star. In this though she naturally segues even her toxic decay related to her past, and interactions with others in often fascinating ways. I love the way she is able to realize kind of the middle ground between introversion and extroversion. This in showing the confidence within her success creates a certain extroversion, yet still there is that introversion of her work in interacting with others where there is this certain difficulty within the most intimate moments. Every point of the character's arc is immaculately realized within Taylor-Joy's performance, and in turn by creating such an earned arc, it is also a deeply satisfying one by the end of the series.)

Camp - (Offers the right impact in bringing this sort of quiet, yet understated power within his presence as the initial truly supporting father figure. Camp finds the right balance in portraying this sort of quiet insular man still showing love, but naturally within his own way. I only wish he had gotten another scene along the way.)

Louis Morgan said...

Heller - (Absolutely wonderful work in realizing the quiet state of distress initial in her character. Portraying so well an innate sadness within her, even as she initially puts front this hopeful warmth in her interactions with Taylor-Joy. She naturally realizes a more openly loving relationship so effectively by showing the spark within herself that gets lit in reacting towards Beth's success. This in showing naturally this honest mother/daughter relationship that develops between the two.)

Melling - (It is a little amusing to me that of the young Harry Potter cast, discounting one timer Robert Pattinson, the most talented one might be Dudley Dursley. Melling's good in portraying just the expected sort of nerdy ego in his initial appearance. This in naturally than and effectively presenting the frustrations in his defeat. One of the surprises for me is in his return, where I thought Melling excelled in being whole lot of different awkwardness, but bringing this real sense of heart within all of it.)

Fortune-Lloyd - (Appropriately slick if too slick. I think I most liked him in his final return in bringing a more earnest quality within his manner.)

Brodie-Sangster - (This one I'm a little torn on, as I'm not sure how seriously we are supposed to take him as the "cool" chess player, as his whole demeanor, right down to the duster, reminded me of Mac from Sunny's attempts to be cool. Perhaps "cool" for a chess player, and there I suppose I can accept his performance more so as a whole lot of egotistical bluster. This as he is good later in portraying his romantic moments against Taylor-Joy in playing the ego even within that, though with the minor moments of seemingly something a bit more earnest.)

Ingram - (Have to say within her return probably was the weakest element in the series, and perhaps telling per the source material, as she just seemed like a combination of every 60's African American cliche all put together and distributed in rapid fire. She acquits herself as well as she can, but it felt a little much as written.)

Calvin:

Well then I would've had to have included Isiah Thomas in supporting, so I don't think I could've won either way.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Glad you took to The Queen's Gambit and its cast, Louis.

Louis: Could I have your thoughts on Beth's final games with Luchenko and Borgov, and also the final scene in the park?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: And your thoughts on Isla Johnston's performance.

Anonymous said...

Luke, have you rethought what the 70 Lead top ten is going to be.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:

1. Scott
2. Nicholson
3. Williamson
4. Hackman
5. Robards
6. Guinness
7. Sellers
8. Volonte
9. Delon
10. Fox

I'd put Harris in #11 though he could be placed lower depending on how well he reacts to Montand in The Confession and Tom Courtenay in One Day In The Life Of Ivan Denisovich

Louis Morgan said...

The Great I enjoyed as basically The Favorite the series, even it is also the Favorite the series in less great way so to speak. This as it is not as good as the Favorite, but it is good as the Favorite's TV alternative. It also is naturally more key, really to enable more sustainability, and I certainly enjoyed its brand of madness. Working both as a comedy, and a semi-drama at times, balancing the sides pretty well though I wouldn't say flawlessly. Still definitely found it to be rather entertaining overall. Hoult also does make it to the end, though they technically could write him out for a season 2, that would be a foolish thing to do.

Hoult - (Speaking of, Hoult is about 80% of the comedy in the show, and for me he wholly worked in delivering that quality. I suppose befitting given he was the one thing that translated from the "film version". Hoult doing what he does best, that being called never being a boring leading man, although what he does here is very different from his more wit induced comedy in the Favorite. Here here's barmy and fool, and I was all there for it every step of the way. Being an absolute hoot at being a complete fool and selling every moment to the nth degree. This with impeccable timing, particularly enjoy his delivering of some of Peter's most insensitive remarks such as the one on burning all pox effected servants. Now I think what is essential about his work though is later on creating some degree of nuance, even within how purposefully broad he is as Peter. He's a great deal of fun, but the moments of showing the potentially better Peter, are realized with great skill and are essential in giving more life to his character. He really is needed for the show, so it would be a major mistake to give him the true Peter fate any time sooner than the final episode of the series.)

Fanning - (Fanning's performance is quite the artful foil to Hoult's insanity, and often times the best moments are the combination of her reactions against his insanity. Unlike Hoult though she is more attuned towards selling the dramatic elements of the series. In that quality she excels in creating the sense of really the stakes within her intention to create a coup. This in the moments of the sort of personal frustration which she portrays well initially and more openly. This though being as good in creating the facade of the happy Empress there trying desperately to create the vision of a perfect royal couple. This against though the scenes of more directly dramatic nature in reacting to the horrors created by her husband's poor rule. Fanning being best in the moment of really learning the "manipulation" being effectively sloppy at first and earning the gradual growth in skill.)

Louis Morgan said...

Fox - (Similar to Fanning in carrying a lot of the dramatic moments. Although she does have a more overarching comic approach in portraying her constant state of frustration as the servant with former nobility, essentially being Stone's role in some ways, but not all ways. Fox delivers that sort of cutting incisiveness needed for the role though with a bit more humanity within the character. This which really grows throughout the series, and Fox handles each step of this well, keeping it from becoming overtly melodramatic, and finding a balance between the two sides effectively.)

Dhawan - (Technically is part of the more dramatic side however his performance is almost entirely comedic. This in this constant state of frustration and fear. It works and is properly quietly amusing throughout in keeping the sort of overly pressured bureaucrat in every regard.)

Wakefield/Lee - (As seem to be the intent of the series, each character seems one thing but we slowly get more depth to them as the series goes on. This working almost every time however. This including them who seem the overly horrible sycophants, though effectively so. Eventually though we see the more intimate nature of their relationship and the two are terrific in developing a sense of an actual love between the two despite her being the Emperor's mistress. Lee is particularly effective in the latter half in showing the slowly decaying of the man's facade as the emperor's "Best friend".)

Godley - (The first time I think I've seen him play a part that wasn't just some minor side part, which he's typically good at as limited as that is. Godley though makes quite a bit out of his bigger role here in bringing the needed grandiose and self-aggrandizing state of a fairly unscrupulous "holy" man. Again though Godley does find nuance within this, both in the moments of speaking of his real passion for faith that he speaks with a more genuine quality naturally showing a deeper side than the initial perspective.)

Hodge - (For most of the series is just a buffoon, and a comical enough one in that time. He's good though when he finally is given something of substance and makes the most out of offering perhaps the general that existed long before his failures.)

Bromilow - (A good rendition of portraying the same time of bonkers as Hoult, if less actively aggressive about it. She's more one note, but effectively so in portraying the consistent sort of mania in her eyes in a fairly amusing way.)

de Souza - (Fails the "Julian Sands" test, this in that I find the "other man" far more interesting than him. I don't know something about his smile made me want Peter to murder him randomly, maybe that's a bit extreme but there was just something about his face. Anyway, the part as written is supposed to be kind of the ideal man compared to Peter, and perhaps too much, but de Souza's attempts at the charm doesn't really realize it to the point that you really accept him as the "match made in heaven". This as he just comes off as a bit boring, particularly when he starts getting moody, and of course compared to Hoult's Peter, but just in general.)

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on tony dalton's performance in better call saul

Louis Morgan said...

Previously discussed my disappointment in The Outsider.

The Good Lord Bird is good, but it isn't great. One of the reasons being is its tone is often a little too unwieldy for its own good. There's also the element of the lead character pretending to be a girl, an idea that probably plays well in the novel, but in visual medium it comes off sillier than it is supposed to. Still when it works it really works, most those things that work involve Hawke directly who is the biggest character in it, but I felt too often absent to be really considered the lead or even co-lead.

Joshua Caleb Johnson (correction he should be #5 in lead) - (Manages to actually elevate the idea of his character rather remarkably, in that he himself is never ridiculous even though the idea behind it so often is. He gives a nice endearing quality within his performance and makes for a good anchor throughout the series, even if I was often just waiting for Brown to show up again. To his point though his performance always was good, and even did his best to sell the whole idea of the female facade without seeming just absurd, though still not convincing.)

Knapp - (Completely different presence from the other films I've seen him. Delivers as basically the kind of Aragorn presence, in the sort of more stable leader compared to Hawke, and good at just being the straight forward source of comfort via expertise.)

Other Brown Boys including Ellar "Death Threats Mae" Coltrane - (Actually everyone is more than decent, even Coltrane here. Not too much is asked of him, but he's fine here.)

Louis Morgan said...

Zahn - (Kind of the most extreme moment being basically Django Unchained degree of ridiculous. I think for the overall product probably would've been better without him, though I did think he was entertaining enough in what he had.)

Point-Du Jour - (Fine in his usually fairly comic reactions of disbelief at both the racists he has to deal with and the crazed Brown.)

Diggs - (I would say maybe just a little too modern for his own good, as to a certain extent he isn't completely away from his Thomas Jefferson. Having said that his charisma still comes through and certainly delivers a larger than life presence. I think he might've done well to temper his style just a little bit, even within the series's more heightened tone, it would've been nice to really accept him as Douglass, more than a stylized Douglass.)

Hawke juniorette - (Wonderfully luminous work from her once again. Just incredibly charming and cheerful right when the series needs it.)

Russell - (Really there just to bring a certain presence of the force again Brown, and delivers that well with that presence he inherited from his old man.)

Hawke - (I'll preface that I'm not sure this performance will be for everyone but I loved it. This as he goes all in essentially creating that look Brown has in historical photographs. This certain intensity that is an inherent quality in the man weighed down by the importance by his mission. Hawke certainly delivers on that intensity though emphasizes all the more though to really portray as a certain kind of madness that inflicts the man. This in creating a sense of danger in the man with a potential for violence within that. Hawke achieves something essential though in that he makes Brown an extremist, but an extremist that you do understand. This as combined with the intensity we get such a powerful sense of the righteousness of his quest within Hawke's forceful delivery. This as Hawke presents a who truly propels himself with a nearly biblical ferocity. Hawke finds more importantly this incredible balance by being always true to the character he presents. This is quite the achievement as he is one thing that really works within every tone, even though Hawke's performance is one of a fascinating consistency. This as Hawke is hilarious at times, particularly when questioning if "Onion" sinned in the brothel, or when he leads an early charge. This same type of candor though is found in the truly moving moments of the man recognizing both his failures to fulfill his quest but also explaining the dire need for it. Hawke makes it all whole by being so true and vivid in the realization of Brown as really this distinctive idiosyncratic figure. A figure in the show itself you take several different ways because of Hawke's performance that is as a mad man, a righteousness, a terrorist but also a crusader for good. Brilliant work.)

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Hoult: #3 behind Mad Max and The Favourite.
Fanning: #2 behind Ginger & Rosa
Mendelsohn: Below many performances.
Taylor-Joy: #1

Anonymous:

Hawke: #2 behind First Reformed.

Luke Higham said...

Pleased that you absolutely loved another performance from Ethan Hawke.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

The Last Dance - (I have no inherent interest in Basketball, but I found this documentary endlessly fascinating and compelling every step of the way. This even with the approach to be specifically a series of character studies more than anything, and thought it was absolutely brilliant as such, and supports an important idea that not every doc needs to be "important" to be great. Even more impressive I felt this way all 10 episodes, and almost felt I could've gone longer just by how well edited and directed it was. This in making so many dramatic moments of creating moments in Jordan's career through editing and the snippets of the different interviews. I was particularly impressed how it managed to consistently find new ground and angles in this approach, and never seemed repetitive despite technically so many scenes are "the Bulls win this game". It is a testament to the doc that is creates narratives out of almost every game they show. It helps though by how detailed it is in making the "characters" so very vibrant throughout, particularly Jordan himself, who you can sense is still attempting to crafting his image even in the doc interview, although often through his own words making the most "anti-Jordan" moments in the doc, which keeping the moments in is part of what makes the doc great and far from a puff piece.)

Michael McCarthy said...

That’s a shame, I really enjoyed The Molly Maguires myself. That might be part of why Harris is as high as he is for me.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Does anyone here watch 'Kim' s Convenience'? Been watching it lately, found it a delightful show.

Tim said...

i watched Scrooged for the first time yesterday. I know, shame on me.
That said, it was all around a great time, with many great mordern additions to the greatest story of all time and humor that actually never seemed out of place for me.


Murray: 4.5
Goldwaith: 3.5
everyone else is a collective 3

Matt Mustin said...

I actually watched the original Miracle on 34th Street for the first time, and I found it pretty irresistible through just how charming and earnest it is.

Gwenn-4 (100% lead, but I get why they put him in supporting)
Payne-3.5
Wood-4
O'Hara-3
Lockhart-3.5
Frawley-3.5
Tonge-3
Hall-3

Matt Mustin said...

Tahmeed: I've seen an episode or two, it's pretty funny.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I watched When Harry Met Sally... and loved every single second of it. I think it might be my new favorite romantic comedy?

Calvin Law said...

In light of recent relevant Golden Globes news, I rewatched The Farewell and boy did it hit hard (though in a nice way).

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

Each of those moments, really are the sort of building, I find earned, feel good ending that the series achieves. The first being the warmth within Luchenko's acceptance of his defeat towards her. Borgov then delivering the climax the series needs, and managing to do it all within the chess board, without seeming over the top. A classic Rocky style moment realized, but within Chess. Then I think park is just a wonderful coda to end on as basically suggesting an optimistic path for her, this in appreciating the way others appreciate her talent more than anything.

Johnston - (A good performance mostly in terms of giving Taylor-Joy really the starting point to build off of. This as Johnston's performance is almost entirely internalized and isolated. She's good in portraying that effectively in the sort of cold yet emotional state of the character. This though while also hinting at Beth's potential later on, in presenting the sort of satisfaction and thrill that exudes from her when playing chess.)

Anonymous:

I've previously given those thoughts.

Calvin:

It is ridiculous to hear that they're doing the same thing to Minari as well. Both films were American productions and should be considered as such. With the logic they're using, Inglourious Basterds should've been placed in foreign language film as well, since over 60% of its dialogue wasn't in English. Of course any concerns could be eliminated if they'd eliminate their silly rule that foreign films can't compete in their best pictures.

Luke Higham said...

The HFPA can fuck right off. This decision doesn't surprise in the least since they've lost all credibility in my eyes for years now.

Tim said...

Robert: am not surprised ... at. all.


Concerning The GG, i always felt tipped off that the Hollywood FOREIGN Press never allowed foreign language features in the big race

out of all of them, they should be the last to cut them out

Calvin Law said...

Louis: I agree. I don’t know why they don’t let foreign language films compete in the drama/musical and comedy categories, it’s not like there’s a foreign film every year that threatens to shake it up, and win in both categories, Parasite would’ve been the anomaly not the norm last year. Why don’t they just let them compete in both categories? Still very strange to me.

Calvin Law said...

And in all fairness Minari wasn’t going to get into Drama I think anyway (though I’m certain The Farewell would have been very likely last year) and it has a more likely change in Foreign. But it’s just the principle of things.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Tim: What’s that supposed to mean?

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your choices for the rest of the cast & director in the 60s UK Departed/Infernal Affairs? To round out the two lads I mentioned.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

The Golden Globes foreign pictures rule has never made sense to me, especially when so many of these films placed in that category as a result (Parasite, The Farewell, The Hunt, Another Round, just to name a few) are far better films than the supposed 'main' contenders. It's antiquated elitism at its most glaringly obvious.

Tim said...

Robert: that it's the single greatest RomCom of all time

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Which 2020 releases are you planning to see by New Year.

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Directed by Peter Yates:

Costello: James Cagney
Dignam: Robert Shaw
Queenen: Ralph Richardson
French: Harry Andrews
Madolyn: Diana Rigg
Captain Ellerby: Peter Finch
Barrigan: Tom Courtenay

Luke:

At the very least Soul and Wonder Woman 1984.

Anonymous said...

Luke, Are there any performances from 2021 you're highly anticipating.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
Bradley Cooper in Soggy Bottom (If there's anyone who can get a 5 star performance from him, it's PTA)
Denzel Washington and Frances McDormand in The Tragedy Of Macbeth
Dev Patel in The Green Knight
Michael Fassbender in Next Goal Wins
Ana De Armas in Blonde
Mark Rylance in The Way Of The Wind

From other films that are on my most anticipated list, I need abit more info or need to wait for festival reviews to determine who the MVPs are.

Luke Higham said...

Also, having Patel on that list is another reason why I really want a David Copperfield review as it'll be a warm up in a way to what is potentially an amazing performance.

Anonymous said...

Luke, are you disappointed Harris didn't get a 5 in this film? With a better script, it could've been possible, like with The Field.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: There's always the initial disappointment that lasts about 10 seconds and then I'm over it. I've said before that The Field would've been his greatest performance with a far superior script and you could definitely say the same here with the nature of the role that he played. I'm that big of a fan of his that I'm dismayed when a potentially great performance is hindered in some way, kinda like Denzel Washington to a degree.

Anonymous said...

Luke, fair enough. Are you still going to give your updated Oscar predictions tomorrow?

Luke Higham said...

You could even put Cromwell in that conversation too.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Maybe, I gave predictions for the Acting Categories not that long ago. I might just save it for New Year since Louis will be doing his again then.

Anonymous said...

Luke, what about Camelot.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Louis warned me off from watching it with Harris' review, possibly a strong 4.5 if it wasn't directed by Joshua Logan. I have listened to the entire soundtrack though and he's really good but honestly I actually liked Burton more as King Arthur.

Luke Higham said...

And Merry Christmas everyone to my fellow brits on the blog and all from around the globe. :)

RatedRStar said...

Merry Christmas everyone!!

Matt Mustin said...

Has anybody had any first time watches for the Holiday this year? I watched The Ref (1994), which I liked a lot, Better Watch Out (2017), which I HATED, Bad Santa, which I thought was good enough, and as mentioned above, Miracle on 34th Street.

Matt Mustin said...

Sorry, to clarify: First time watches of Holiday films specifically.

Emi Grant said...

Happy Holidays everyone. Hope you're all having a good one.

Emi Grant said...

Matt: I'll try to get to A Christmas Tale this year.

BRAZINTERMA said...

Hello Louis and everyone!
To celebrate today speak your lists of Christmas movies. If anyone had already made this list before here on the blog, speak again because you may have seen another remarkable film after the time.

10º Gremlins
9º Remember the Night
8º A Christmas Story
7º Meet me in St. Louis
6º It's a Wonderful Life
5º A Christmas Carol / Scrooge (1951)
4º The Nightmare Before Christmas
3º Die Hard
2º Home Alone
1º Edward Scissorhands

And you what is your TOP 10? Comment!
Merry Christmas Louis and everyone!

Anonymous said...

Louis: Thoughts on Howe's work in this film? Also, your screenwriter for that 60's Mississippi Burning (with Ritt directing it and Howe shooting it)?

Luke Higham said...

I completely forgot Lance Henriksen in Falling for Alternate Supporting.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If you're watching them today, Thoughts on Soul & Wonder Woman 1984 and their casts with ratings.

Anonymous said...

Anyone watched News of the World? If so, what did you think of Zengel?

Louis Morgan said...

Merry Christmas everyone, a bit less busy than my usual Christmases, for obvious reasons, though it did allow me to watch Soul....and may be able to see Wonder Woman later, we shall see.

Anonymous:

I have to say Howe's work here is probably one of his least interesting. It is mainly just competently shot in just really the standard color aesthetic for the time. There was nothing notable beyond that in my view in terms of any of the choices.

I'd say Irving Ravetch and Harriet Frank Jr.

Luke:

Well as our resident Pixar Scrooge, I have to say I rather liked Soul. Perhaps it was the limit on slapstick, which I didn't feel overdone, perhaps it was the story was rather spirited (no pun intended) managing to do it without a last minute villain reveal which I appreciated, perhaps the wonderful use of music, both in score and a diegetic sense, or the animation which I found particularly beautiful here in the "Earth" scenes. Of course it still sticks to the overall Pixar formula of "having to get home road-trip involving a duo", but unlike Onward it didn't feel so obvious within this approach, nor was it horribly repetitive like that film. I was overjoyed to find the whole film did not take place in the spirit world, for example. Not flawless still, part of the resolution definitely like they threw up their hands and said "eh we will just go with the simplest solution". Also, not sure how I feel exactly about it, but the semi-villain in the film is directly lifted from Hunt For the Wilderpeople (again as I enjoyed the villain there, don't hate the choice exactly, it just feels a little too blatant). Still definitely a better Pixar in my book.

Foxx - 4
Fey - 3.5
Rashad - 3
Diggs - 3
Bassett - 3
Norton - 3
House - 3
Ayoade - 3
Braga - 3

Luke Higham said...

Thoughts on the Soul cast.

Luke Higham said...

I'm ashamed to say, my dad got me Tenet on DVD (Knowing that I'm a Nolan fan) but I'm still thankful to him with the way things are right now.

Anonymous said...

Anyone watching News of The World/Promising Young Woman soon?

Bryan L. said...

Luke: You can at least rewatch it now with subtitles and finally understand what everyone was saying. So there’s that.

Merry Christmas y’all.

Bryan L. said...

Matt: For the first time? Just the 1951 Scrooge, and it was awhile back actually. Should definitely watch another asap.

Anonymous said...

Louis, is Soul now your favorite Jamie Foxx performance or is it still Baby Driver?

Anonymous said...

Guys, whoch 5 performers do you think have the most promising year (2021) ahead of them.

Anonymous said...

Guys, which 5 performers do you think have the most promising year (2021) ahead of them.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
1. Bradley Cooper (Soggy Bottom and Nightmare Alley)
2. Anya Taylor-Joy (Last Night In Soho and The Northman)
3. Adam Driver (Annette and The Last Duel)
4. Oscar Isaac (Dune and The Card Counter)
5. Willem Dafoe (The Northman, The French Dispatch, Nightmare Alley and The Card Counter)

Luke Higham said...

Robert: Have you seen Clemency yet. If so, is Aldis Hodge Co-Lead or Supporting.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Luke: I haven’t (to my embarrassment), but I have a friend who named him his supporting win last year.

Anonymous said...

Luke, your rating & thoughts on Chadwick Boseman in MRBB

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: 5, It's quite an extraordinary piece of work from a performer that had even greater potential than I had imagined. I won't say more because I don't think I could do it justice.

ruthiehenshallfan99 said...

Merry Christmas, everybody!

Louis Morgan said...

Watched Wonder Woman as well, which I enjoyed, though definitely flawed in a lot of ways. One being it is too long (though easier to deal with the length of a film like this than other more dour DCEU fair), this as it could easily have been at least a half hour shorter (for example one could cut out the opening ten minutes and lose nothing. This as it really serves no purpose other than to make the morality message as obvious as possible). The length being particularly noticeable when the film honestly only has 4 real characters, which again I wouldn't say it even needed more if it was tighter as is. It also is sloppier than the first in a lot of ways (the invisibility ability not being even remotely setup for example). Now I did enjoy the interactions and journeys of the characters we did have, enjoyed much of the action, and even actually rather took to the idea of sort of the classic style morality tale that very much relates to the old school days of superheroes (though again I think they could've done a lot less spoon feeding in that regard). Still the question is did I find it entertaining in general, and that answer is yes, more or less.

Gadot - 4
Pine - 3.5
Wiig - 4
Pascal - 4

Will get to thoughts on the performances of both later.

Michael McCarthy said...

I just finished WW84 and I’m surprised how easy you were on it Louis. I thoroughly enjoyed Wonder Woman (2017) and I was tired of this within the first hour. Also, I thought Pascal was HORRIBLE.

Aidan Pittman said...

I know I'm late now, but Merry Christmas guys!

Michael McCarthy said...

Like the film itself wasn’t terrible, but for some reason it just felt like the last straw for me in on the subject of “can we please break up every corporation that owns any major intellectual property.” I just miss seeing blockbusters that have their own personalities you know?

Calvin Law said...

So in positive news, I watched Minari finally. I know I hyped it up before, and I’m going to have to take a break from talking about it. Because I was blown away even from my sky high expectations.

Aidan Pittman said...

Calvin: I'm absolutely dying to see it right now, same for Nomadland, especially given that 2020 has been..... 2020. Hoping I'll get to both in the near future.

Matt Mustin said...

Not a 2020 movie but I finally saw Glass (Shyamalan) and it's very, very stupid.

McAvoy-3.5
Willis-1(Not even kind of trying)
Jackson-2.5(He's phoning it in too, but not as much as Willis, and he still manages to be at least slightly compelling just through his natural presence)
Paulson-2
Taylor-Joy-2.5
Clark-1
Woodard-1.5(Not entirely her fault, but she's certainly not blameless)

Matthew Montada said...

Watched Wonder Woman 1984 last night. Add this to the pile of disappointments from this year. I give it a C- (4/10). Don’t have much to say. I do have a short review on my Letterboxd though if you guys wanna check it out.

Here are my ratings for the cast:
Gal Gadot - 3.5 (She didn’t stand out to me that much compared to the first one, but i did give her an extra +0.5 for the ending. If it wasn’t for the ending, she would be a 3)

Chris Pine - 3 (was mostly used for dumping exposition and dumb jokes, but he manages to make the material he’s working with SOMEWHAT work, even if him and Gadot don’t have the same chemistry as they did in the first one. Not a fan of what they did with his characterization. Side Note: his explanation for bringing him back was BEYOND stupid.)

Kristen Wiig - 2 (Sorry Louis, but i just did not buy this performance at all. Her line delivery just felt off for me most of the time and she never feels like she fully embodies her character in any way.)

Pedro Pascal - 4 (Easily the MVP of this entire cast. The character that he’s working with is about as 1-dimensional as he can be, but Pascal manages to make the garbage material that he’s working with sound good through his gleefully over-the-top performance. Also, kudos for actually trying to bring some emotional depth to his character, especially near the end.)

Louis Morgan said...

Foxx - (I'll say his tendency to overact actually makes him more suited for vocal performances. This as it becomes a kind of strength given that his voice is itself expressive, which works wonders here to give the character a real life of its own in every step of his journey. Foxx finding a real sense of the needed vibrancy for the character's passions, but also hitting the specific moments in the more reflective moments. My favorite performance of his.)

Fey - (Kind of the more expected Pixar sidekick beat, but she does it well. This even when I thought she might be too much at first, I could see eventually that is the point. This as she nicely tempers it and switches naturally towards a more enthusiastic approach, and then later a more depressive one.)

Everyone else hits their specific beats in Soul well, particularly enjoyed Ayoade's entirely comic deliveries and not torn on House's actual performance as she's great at that.

Gadot & Pine - (The chemistry was less well exploited this time around, but I still thought it was there. In turn they very much carried me through a lot of moments, just because I bought into them to such a degree, even when a lot of their material wasn't exactly great. Still since they had a core of something it carried through for me, Gadot in particular I thought managed well with the more emotional moments granted to her, even if the big one did feel a bit rushed within the script.)

Wiig - (Well I did believe her transformation, and more than anything just liked the idea of having her as a comic book villain in general. I do think while their could've been a lot more meat within the transformation itself, again it is harder when there are literally only characters of any substance total. Still I took to her as a villain even if it was not particularly well used overall.)

Pascal - (The easiest one I think I can defend because, yes he's over the top, but as over the top "tv pitchmen" go, he's not that over the top. I think his approach wholly made sense, and for me worked, as Pascal threw himself into just bringing to life that intensity of a singular greed that drove the whole idea of character. This while for me, even though it is an extreme anti-note, still hitting the specific emotional element granted to his character.)

Michael:

Well I did say it was "Flawed in a lot of ways". Sometimes one needs to recognize "gut reaction" and while watching the film, I said "I don't mind this", but you won't see me attempting to defend the film.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Did you watch Bowling for Columbine when you covered 2002.

Matthew Montada said...

Just finished watching Soul. One of the year’s best AND it was an anticipated film of mine that didn’t disappoint me for once (the more i think about a film like Mank, the less i like it). I give it an A (9.5/10)

Here are my ratings for the cast:
Jamie Foxx - 4
Tina Fey - 3.5
Questlove - 2.5
Phylicia Rashad - 3
Angela Bassett - 3
Daveed Diggs - 2.5
Graham Norton - 3
Rachel House - 3
Richard Ayoade - 3

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Cromwell's Score and Costume Design.

Anonymous said...

Luke, your top five James & Edward Fox performances

Luke Higham said...

James:
1. Performance
2. King Rat
3. The Servant
4. A Passage To India
5. Charlie And The Chocolate Factory

Edward:
1. The Day Of The Jackal
2. The Dresser (83)
3. The Dresser (15)
4. The Go-Between
5. A Bridge Too Far

Calvin Law said...

I've heard that apparently they might be running Mikkelsen in Comedy/Musical for Another Round. Not a bad placement (it is a dramedy after all) and he could actually contend for a win if they go for him there considering the absence of competition.

Mitchell Murray said...

Calvin: Funny that you should mention Mikkelsen, because I re-watched "Casino Royale" today, and my love for the film and it's performances have only been verified.

I also revisited "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", which is another 80's comedy that I continue to enjoy a great deal. Beyond that, I fully support Robert's winning request for Alan Ruck, since his performance is really the crux of the film's success.

Mitchell Murray said...

And on another note, I'd just like to mention that this year's season finale for "Death Battle" (a show I've promoted a few times) is premiering on Monday. The fight will be Hulk Vs Broly IE two planet busting rage monsters who like the colour green.

In reference to the show, what would be everyone's thoughts on the animation/music of this fight - Genos Vs War Machine?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBJsQ_RzSp0

Calvin Law said...

Louis: your ranking of the Fast and Furious films?

Bryan L. said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

I've seen it long before then.

Luke:

The costumes serve their purpose effectively. This just a slightly generalized historical representation. I wouldn't say that sort of take the next step beyond that however. This as they are convincing enough if not in themselves remarkable like say those of A Man For All Seasons in comparison for example. They are more then good on their own end.

The score is decent to at times a bit too bombastic in its approach. This in part is direction that too often uses to accentuate moments in such an absurdly extreme way.

Calvin:

1. Fast & Furious 6
2. Fast Five
3. Furious 7
4. Hobbs & Shaw
5. The Fate of the Furious