Wednesday 10 January 2024

Alternate Best Actor 2015: Leland Orser in Faults

 Leland Orser did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Ansel Roth in Faults. 

Faults follows a down on his luck "expert" of cults being tasked to deprogram a young woman Claire (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) by her parents. 

Leland Orser is another reliable character actor, however a character actor who tends to fulfill a certain kind of role. Which is if you need someone who seems like they're on the furthest edges and have in fact already fallen off Orser is typically the man for the job. Faults then offers a unique opportunity for Orser to take a leading role, though technically a leading role within his wheelhouse. We open the film as such as we see Ansel Roth eating at a hotel restaurant, where he has twice used a voucher to get a free meal. Orser already is completely dialed into this certain state of the man as he insists upon his right to his meal. There's already that intensity within his work that denotes a man who certainly has been through much, and has this sort of shakiness in his voice that shows even as he's trying to confidently make his case, he is not particularly convincing as such. Orser's innately discombobulated presence takes this a bit further as he brings to life a distinct dark comedy in the manner of Ansel as he first attempts to argue about it with his breaking delivery, but there's really great low key physical comedy in his manner of quickly eating the last bit of his meal before it can be taken away, followed by attempting to continue his meal by eating ketchup. Orser's physical timing is ideal in just bringing such a severe petulance in the act, before he is ushered out. 

Ansel though is here slightly notably as an author of a famous book about the nature of cults and basically being an expert on cult deprogramming. But despite this Orser oozes with a pathetic state as his eyes are just filled with an exasperated anxiety as he struggles even to argue about getting his hotel room for another night and just tries to complain about his poster advertising his speaking engagement being knocked over with kind of a squeaking near whisper. Orser doesn't portray this as some new state that Ansel is in, rather Ansel has been in this state for a long desperate time. We see him in his speaking engagement where Orser brings just a hint more of confidence, not much more but rather enough of the sign of maybe some professional at some time presenting now the bare minimum effort. Although even that limited effort leads him to be attacked by the family member of a woman he deprogrammed that eventually committed suicide. Where Orser's delivery of the explanation is a wonderfully portrayed miserable deflection of explaining how it was still better that he did what he did even though she died. Orser's seething in this overflowing anxiety in trying to explain as basically a long prepared, yet still quite underwhelming, excuse for what he has done. 

The plot kicks in when the parents of a woman in a cult come to Ansel with a request for him to help them in this challenging task. Orser's performance is a magnificent ballet of inadequate awkwardness as he almost instantly tries to exploit any money from them. Including his requirement that they pay him for his new, unpopular book, where Orser does a juggling of words to find the price with just brilliant nervous energy that is funny, while also showing just how desperate the man is to make even just a little bit of money. When he discusses the case, mostly for the meal they promised him, Orser again presents just a little bit more confidence, not a lot but just a little as he runs down what he'll need, although his accentuation of a "lot of money" instantly shows how it is entirely all that Ansel is fixated on when it comes to the opportunity. That and again the free meal, where Orser again brings some dark comedy in the way he both slides the bill over to the parents, and speaks his thank you for the meal as the most weak willed of demands rather than of any genuine appreciation for what they've done to him. Orser sets up effortlessly this extreme state of the money who is insecure about everything, has some very specific background where he had some success, but now only in need for whatever will sustain him for a bit more time. 

And as he arranges for the kidnapping of Claire, Orser's performance does shift again naturally to the man in operation mode. He's again hardly some man exuding confidence, but what he does show is just that much more beyond even the speaking arrangement as he goes about something he has done before. Suddenly as he is giving out orders to his hired thugs, tasked with moving Claire into his deprogramming hotel room, there is finally a little more to him, not a lot but a little. Orser's particularly good in the moment where he's instructing Claire to follow his orders, lest the men "who aren't here friends" shall hurt her even though he won't. And in the moment you do get a glimpse of someone who has had some command of his methods, even if in a most limited amount. And such facades quickly fade as he begins with the actual start of the deprogramming where Orser is one man show of constantly switching between attempted forced upon confidence against the most extreme anxiety. Orser's is how the film thrives because of the way he approaches every moment there is a particular almost hard to specify energy in him making this act particularly unpredictable as he attempts, and frequently, fails to go through the steps with Claire in his so-called process. His moments of trying to put on this empathy and care in breaking her of her believes, while instantly shattering in his whole manner to be the man so filled with fear whenever she comes back with unexpected force, or when her father starts demanding strange orders like telling Claire that she looks pretty after she puts on tightly fitting clothes from when she was a teenager. 

Eventually this leads to the main reveal of the film which spoilers this in fact an elaborate ruse where Claire is in fact a cult leader, her parents are fake and just members of the cult, and the whole setup is to in fact indoctrinate Ansel into the cult. So what happens is a strange dance of control when Claire begins to turn the table on Ansel, first by the technique of confusing him in the beginning before becoming more overtly dominant after some time. This is the instance that may flop entirely if not for Orser because so much relies on his performance to convincingly show us a deprogrammer getting programmed.  And Orser is convincing as such by really building up the man defined by insecurities and that being exploited eventually. His performance portrays so effectively this desire for comfort within the nervousness, the insanity nearly things are spiraling out of control, so when Claire begins to comfort him, by basically offering specific controls for him, Orser earns it by showing the way Ansel as been looking for this for so much time. The particular moment of the transition is just outstanding work from Orser, because you see just how it is at this apex of the man approaching his nervous breakdown that is pulling him in every other direction. The emotional need was so incredibly severe and painful. The nervousness finally seems to find some genuine ease of his normally hectic state when she begins to manipulate him, and Orser being wholly convincing in portraying this fundamental shift. A shift that should be potentially ridiculous but one that Orser earns through how he builds to it, while also just in the moment the way he refocuses the intensity into his work, the way he looks at Winstead with this fascination and really sudden different kind of loving intensity. There's a bizarre kind of warmth in the moment that is great because it becomes extremely creepy, while also being convincing that the man is finding some sort of second life, in basically becoming a drone. And when she begins to order him, rather than the unfocused man without purpose, Orser is powerful in portraying this sudden eerie conviction in the man as he only follows orders and does exactly what she says. Orser's whole performance really is the key to the film, because so much is really focused on his carrying of the energy, in those moments of purposefully awkward dark comedy, the emotional desperation that leads us to believable see the de-converter become the converted. 

129 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on Winstead. Has she been upgraded on this viewing. If so, where would you rank her in 2015 Lead Actress.

Mitchell Murray said...

So I was wrong when I said this line up was totally new to me...I HAVE seen "Faults", but it was so long ago I barely remember the film. I think it was during a phase in my life where I was specifically seeking out Winstead's movies.

In any case, based on this very positive take on Orser, I'm inclined to give it a rewatch.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Winstead is still a 4.5. Her performance though is like Orser's but the opposite end, and in a way not as much of a high wire act as the greater extreme is in the ending scenes. She's good though certainly in portraying the lost in the wood act who just seems to be some fully brainwashed zombie who is quietly wistful for cult though quietly cutting at times where she as wistfully threatens Ansel at the same time. The shift when it happens is sudden, though certainly built towards, and that is where Winstead is at her best because she is genuinely captivating and charismatic in a way where you can believe he bending of will in the moment. Because she manages to do in a way that is both imperious while also being weirdly calming at the same time.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

He's indeed amazing in this.

Louis: Your top 10 favorite "I don't know who this actor/actress is, but now I need to see more of them" performances?

Bryan L. said...

Tony: Barbie strikes me as the annual "popcorn, crowd-pleasing" choice that does pick up several nominations, but not in Best Director. Then again, that could very well ending up being Alexander Payne.

Also, they've recently find room for a "prestige" choice in that Category, and Glazer/Song/Triet fit that bill.

Marcus said...

Louis: Who would you cast as Henry Kissinger in a good version of an Adam Mckay-styled hitpiece on him?

Bryan L. said...

I would also like to mention that each of Alexander Payne's Directing nominations (2004, 2011, 2013) have also included Martin Scorsese getting in that same year. More likely that it's just a coincidence, but still.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: your thoughts on the rest of the cast?

Matt Mustin said...

Marcus: Simon Russell Beale.

Emi Grant said...

So, 2 things:

1) WTF, SAGs?

2) I watched Dogman today (not the 2018 one, but one made by Luc Besson) and apparently not a lot of people loved it, but I enjoyed it quite a bit. Caleb Landry Jones is in my top 5 for Lead Actor. Possibly top 3.

Louis Morgan said...

Ytrewq:

Christoph Waltz - Inglourious Basterds
Ben Foster - 3:10 to Yuma
Jessie Buckley - Taboo
Issey Ogata - Silence
Sam Rockwell - Galaxy Quest (Though I unknowingly had seen him in TMNT)
Marion Cotillard - La Vie En Rose
Naomi Watts - Mulholland Drive
Choi Min-sik - Oldboy
Edward Norton - Primal Fear
Javier Bardem - No Country For Old Men

Marcus:

As bad as Golda was, I actually thought Liev Schreiber was convincing as Kissinger, despite getting very little to do overall, and honestly would like to see him expand on that with a decent script.

Lucas:

Grant & Ellis - (Both are also effective in playing their parts as seemingly the concerned parents, then shifting to this strange state of Ellis having this weird random aggression and specific weird lust at times. And Grant seeming distantly odd. And then are very good in their final scene in the sheer specific fascination they are in.)

Gries - (Funny by being completely separate from the rest of the film in playing someone who's not in any of it, and bringing that sort of more casual quality. Before his big scene, where he manages to play it well as just straight up horrified.)

Reddick - (His expected presence, though utilized beautifully with a quiet comical quality within just hos specific he is in his casual threatening manner.)

Anonymous said...

Louis: Rating for Liev Schreiber in Golda and what are your top 10 performances of his?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of The Teachers's Lounge.

Jonathan Williams said...

Louis: Thoughts on the visual effects of Dead Man's Chest (2006), At World's End (2007) and Transformers (2007).

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Would you like to see a Legend Of Sleepy Hollow film directed by Robert Eggers.

8000S said...

Louis: Now this might sound weird, but I have this theory that someone suggested Wincott for Black Mask in that Birds of Prey movie, but Cathy Yan believed that he was too obvious of a choice, so she went with McGregor.

Kind of like how I believe there was someone in the production team of Ghost Rider who also suggested Wincott for Blackheart, but Bentley got the part instead.

Let's face it, Wincott would have been the best part of those movies had he been cast in those roles.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

3

Luke:

Benesch - 4.5(Effortlessly carries the film, even when I think the film does entirely lose itself later on. Her performance though is terrific in terms of cultivating the central tensions in a believable way within her own performance. As she manages to portray the right sense of reality as she has the most immediate outside of her work as the pleasant outgoing teacher who brings the sort of sunny energy needed for a pre-teen group, while still showing enough of the quick sense of frustrations when needing to discipline the students. She's as good though in the staff scenes, where she shows a bit more modest energy than the actual natural state of the person, though we still see the sense of innate passion within the character as someone who definitely cares about her job and her students. She's then effective in putting both states through the wringer, balancing between the sense of exhaustion and frustration, while showing her trying to maintain the teacher's energy, and the authentic passion. Even when I do think the film goes too far in terms of the overall situation, I always found her work convincing.)

Lobau - 3.5(Although where I think the character goes stretches being convincing, I do think she gives an effective portrayal of this sort of self-righteous indignation trying to hide this pettiness that is constantly revealing itself.)

Everyone else is good at creating the reality of the school, in relatively simple parts.

Absolutely.

Jonathan Williams:

Dead Man's Chest and At The World's End, are both great in terms of their visual effects, and I think actually along with Transformers, was perhaps in some ways a strange last gasp with a lot big budget effects where I think the way to use CGI got lost a little bit as afterwards is where you see the shift to overconfidence in CGI. As while Davy Jones and his men are all CGI, they're on actual sets where I would imagine today, they'd just make the whole thing CGI. Anyway, there are some minor hiccups there, some of Davy Jones's other men were clearly not given as much time, but Jones himself STILL holds up, and it is impressive with just how impressive his CGI is. But also the environmental work is detailed, and convincing, and the kraken is a great grandiose effect. At the World's End is perhaps a bit more overt in some respects in some of the fantastical CGI, all effective as such and again there is a combination between the real and the CGI.

Transformers also still impresses in terms of the visual effects, where the Transformers themselves hold up visually, and again with combination with real effects, as a particularly impressive moment is when on the highway the one rips through another bus. But there are many such moments where the Transformers definitely feel part of the real environment, which is most impressive, and in away the idea of the transformation always works, as believe the robot from each vehicle. It's impressive work...in a less impressive film.

8000's:

I mean it should've been the case for both.

Louis Morgan said...

Also ASC

El Conde
Maestro
Killers of the Flower Moon
Poor Things
Oppenheimer

I'd say this is probably the Oscar five, as usually Oscar comes in with the more idiosyncratic choice, but since that is already there with El Conde, there's no reason to doubt this set.

Tony Kim said...

Surreal to see a whole 5-star review for a performance in a film that I recommended.

Louis: Do you have any longer thoughts on Schreiber as Kissinger.

Also, your thoughts on the use of music in The Holdovers, particularly "The Wind" and "Crying Laughing Loving Lying".

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

I think that Benny Safdie could also work as young Kissinger with Schreiber as a middle aged Kissinger and Beale as the old one, if we were to take a Love & Mercy-like approach to this film.

Mitchell Murray said...

Everyone: Random note here, but I was thinking about these two questions today and I was curious to see everyone's input.

First, my impression with this years best actress race is that Stone and Gladstone are the heavy weights. Without spoiling either film, because there still unavailable to me, who would be everyone's personal pick? My baseline instinct would be to give it to the newcomer (since this would be Stone's 2nd win out of 4 nods), but it should ideally be decided by merit above anything else.

Secondly, I was recently made aware that the final film role of Orson Welles was that of Unicron in the original 1986 "Transformers". For being such an icon in cinema, I'm admittedly illversed with Welles' filmography ("Citizen Kane" notwithstanding, since I watched it for a film class). My question, then, is where should I start with his body of work, either as a director or actor?

Calvin Law said...

I'd be equally happy with either winning. Stone is my #2 of the year, Gladstone is my #4, both would be fantastic winners. I would probably prefer Gladstone to win though because Stone is a previous winner and Gladstone's win would be historic on various levels.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Do you think Sessa has a good chance of making it to the final 5, a la Hedges/Manchester by the Sea? Hedges only had a SAG nomination before being nominated, and I think the goodwill for The Holdovers and its performances might get Sessa over the line at BAFTA and the Academy.

Bryan L. said...

Mitchell: Same boat as Calvin, really. I technically prefer Stone since her performance is more crucial to her films' success, but Gladstone winning would elicit a bigger reaction from me tbh.

Regarding Orson Welles, Touch of Evil would be a good start if you'd like to check him out both as an actor and director. Two birds one stone. It's a film that's easy to follow.

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

Not really, he does a good evocation of Kissinger's distinct mannerisms without being a caricature, but he doesn't really get to do anything beyond that.

I mean I love the whole soundtrack, Christmas Mix/70's mix was basically a can't miss for me but also love the implementation of it. "Crying Laughing Loving Lying", is a standout, I mean if you're going do a montage, do it to a great song, but also fitting as Angus in the scene is literally trying to "laugh" in a situation were he could be crying, as basically trying to find any joy he can uncover in the empty school. And then we get the ending where we also see the same choice by Mr. Hunham with his situation at the end.

The Wind's a thematically simpler implementation, but still a big fan regardless, where both really are in unexpected place as a pair, yet finding joy, with the song being such wonderful amplification of that.

Tahmeed:

I think he really needs to show up at BAFTA, even as a Jury save, to remind people for me to see it happening. But maybe The Holdovers has its best day, and it could happen, particularly as Melton is seeming less and less likely. I'm probably going with Dafoe/Ruffalo to fill the 4 & 5 in terms of my own predictions, as long as Ruffalo shows up at BAFTA. But I could see one where Ruffalo trades off with Dafoe (like Dano/Hirsch) and either Melton or Sessa get in. My point being, supporting actor is definitely wide open for probably just those last two slots, but you could sell me on Ruffalo, Dafoe, Brown or Sessa for them, maybe even Mescal.

Tony Kim said...

8000S: Since you were asking Louis about her a while ago, your thoughts on this? https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/selena-gomez-linda-ronstadt-biopic-1234944132/

Louis: Are you by any chance still predicting McAdams?

Robert MacFarlane said...

I'm predicting McAdams out of spite at this point.

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

No. It is possible to be nominated without any of the televised precursors, however such instances typically are part of a film that is already a contender or have some other factor like Riseborough with the campaign last year or Tommy Lee Jones for In the Valley of Elah, where the support for him somehow managed to shift from supporting actor to lead actor.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your cast for an Eggers version of Sleepy Hollow (With or without the additional characters from Burton's film).

Anonymous said...

PGA Ten
American Fiction
Anatomy of a Fall
Barbie
The Holdovers
Killers of the Flower Moon
Maestro
Oppenheimer
Past Lives
Poor Things
The Zone of Interest

Emi Grant said...

Man, what a great line-up and Maestro.

Tony Kim said...

Louis and Robert: Do you think she would've been any stronger a contender had the film been released during awards season, or would it have been about the same? I can imagine her getting nominated at SAG over Cruz, had that been the case.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the ending of Faults.

Anonymous said...

Tony: I personally believe if the movie was released during awards season, it would've been campaigned more, and McAdams would have been a stronger contender.

Louis Morgan said...

PGA predictions wise seems like a very convincing best picture lineup (given they included the more daring choices of Anatomy and Zone), so unless All of Us Strangers gets in Best film at BAFTA (which I didn't expect to show up here), I'd say this is the ten. Also this gives hope for Huller and Lee to come back after their SAG snubs.

Quality wise, I must echo Emi's thoughts, and I would love for Strangers to somehow push out Maestro, as that is the only genuine fly in this lineup.

Luke:

The ideal would be in fact an anthology film of adaptations of Washington Irving's three most famous stories, as I think too much expansion would weaken them. As essentially Rip Van Winkle as a mythical comedy, Sleepy Hollow as comedic horror, then The Devil and Tom Walker as a full on horror, and yes I have thought much about this idea.

Rip Van Winkle:

Rip Van Winkle: Ralph Ineson
Rip Van Winkle's Wife: Kate Dickie
Rip Van Winkle's Daughter: Anya Taylor-Joy
Hendrick Hudson: Willem Dafoe
Nicholas Vedder: Robert Pattinson

Sleepy Hollow:

Ichabod Crane: Robert Pattinson
Brom Bones: Alexander Skarsgard
Katrina van Tassel: Anya Taylor-Joy
Hans van Ripper: Willem Dafoe
Bultus Van Tassel: Ralph Ineson

The Devil and Tom Walker:

Tom Walker: Alexander Skarsgard
Tom Walker's Wife: Nicole Kidman
Old Scratch: Willem Dafoe
Captain Kidd: Robert Pattinson
Deacon Peabody: Ralph Ineson

Tony:

I actually think it would've gotten swallowed up among the later releases and maybe McAdams doesn't build the momentum to even get her critics wins she's gotten. I will say, just because of those critics wins, I do think she does have a vague possibility of a nomination still, just because the passion is there, I'm just not sure if any of it exists in the academy.

The ending is memorable ambiguous ending, in terms of what "Claire" will now do with Ansel, and properly chilling in what you see her power particularly in the casual moment of essential the communion suicides just before then and of course the bloody murders.

8000S said...

Louis: Of course, there have been comparisons between Carol and Douglas Sirk movies.

Sirk was actually interested in adapting the Highsmith novel in 1960 and cast Bacall in Blanchett's role and Natalie Wood in Mara's, with Chandler and Brackett writing the script.

Thoughts?

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Well, given the subject matter I don't think it had a chance of getting made, without being fundamentally changed though that certainly would've been a good cast, and writing team.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: what seasons of Curb Your Enthusiasm have you watched?

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Regarding your choice of Taron Egerton for Elvis Costello - knowing your lack of familiarity with the latter's music, by "that style of presence" were you referring just to what you've seen of him in his TV/film appearances?

Also, are you a fan of any of the other musicians that I listed.

Louis Morgan said...

Regarding Perfect Days, To those pretender films NOW this is how you do a film where "nothing happens", and perhaps in a weird way, a film as gradually paced as this one truly shows where it is all about the smallest details and where actually pacing in a way matters more. Anyway though, this film is in many ways just an ideal mix for me between, classic hits, a professional doing their job with quiet precision and passion, an appreciation for the little moments, wonderful scenes of quietly earned character, and just a particular love of life, while in no way forgetting about hardship. What a splendid joy of a film.

Plus it features the most fiendish villain of 2023: the double shift. 

Emoto - 3.5
Nakano - 3.5
Aso - 3.5
Ishikawa - 3.5
Miura - 4

Michael McCarthy said...

No one asked, but here are my “tops” for 2023 as of now

Picture:

1. Poor Things
2. Oppenheimer
3. The Zone of Interest
4. The Holdovers
5. All of Us Strangers
6. The Boy and the Heron
7. Killers of the Flower Moon
8. Monster
9. BlackBerry
10. The Killer

HM: Perfect Days, Past Lives

Actress:

1. Emma Stone
2. Sandra Hüller
3. Sakura Ando
4. Lubna Azabal
5. Greta Lee

HM: Mia Goth

Actor:

1. Paul Giamatti
2. Cillian Murphy
3. Andrew Scott
4. Dominic Sessa
5. Koji Yakusho

HM: Glenn Howerton

Supporting Actress:

1. Lily Gladstone
2. Rachel McAdams
3. Sandra Hüller (it’s not unlikely I’ll switch her to lead though)
4. Danielle Brooks
5. Claire Foy

HM: Da’Vine Joy Randolph

Supporting Actor:

1. Paul Mescal
2. Robert De Niro
3. Robert Downey, Jr.
4. Ryan Gosling
5. Holt McCallany

HM: Mark Ruffalo

Anonymous said...

Louis: Thoughts on the cast of Perfect Days.

Calvin Law said...

So happy you loved Perfect Days, Louis. Thoughts on the cast?

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Your thoughts on these scenes?

The Killer - "How Soon Is Now?"; the bear joke; confronting Claybourne.
KotFM - Lizzie's final vision; Ernest gets paddled; Mollie meets with a priest; the fire.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I kind of fail to see the Danielle Brooks praise? There’s nothing that makes her performance different than Oprah’s other than she sings.

Razor said...

Louis: Thoughts on Suzume's score and the titular song?

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

I mean I didn't say I had absolutely no familiarity with him, I'm still aware of him in a general sense, as well as his covers.

I mean I wouldn't say I'm a superfan out of any of them, but I definitely like a few songs from almost all of them.

The first assassination scene, I think speaks to something I've seen as many believing the film believes in the cynicism and nihilism of the Killer, and in my view misinterpreting the film, as the very first act as the professional killer shows for a lack of a better description "he's full of shit". Now just aesthetically, amazing in terms of the craft of Fincher's choices in the editing, the sound, the cinematography of the moment, of building towards the act. In terms of the scene, you have the intricate detail of the Killer, up until this point, carefully denoting every step of his meticulous process, every detail to a point without question, repeating his creed with such confidence...only to immediately screw up, which I love as an immediate juxtaposition. And it isn't that the Killer's completely incompetent, he's not, but he's truly an unreliable narrator.

Excellent joke delivery by Swinton in savory every detail, and the joke itself illustrates again cutting down the very notion of the detached killer, in this instance the hunter himself desiring something very different from the kill each time.

An anti-climax that I do love, because it is the complete reversal of the typical mastermind, amplified by Howard's performance who really is basically lost the whole time, completely conveying the guy who almost probably bought the hit on a lark. And is convincing in convincing you that he'd convince the killer to let it go, because he is so bad at explaining things other than as some kind of novice of the whole world he really didn't know anything beyond the basics.

I'd rather not comment on any further scenes from Killers of the Flower Moon, particularly any with De Niro or DiCaprio, until say a little over two weeks' time.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous & Calvin:

Emoto - (Enjoyably doofusy as really the opposite of mr. Harayama in almost every way, and just plays into the complete fool effectively. However, I did really love the one moment with the disabled kid, where we saw a bit of a different side of him, and there was a nice warmth I liked and maybe a suggestion at perhaps some better possibilities for him.)

Nakano - (Creates the right sense of the relationship of one based kind of an admiring fascination, though also respectful towards her relative in every interaction and creates just a reserved warmth, while also projecting sort of the energy of the youth that creates a separation.)

Aso - (For needing to convey much in a single scene, does so effectively in the conversation that creates the sense of this history filled though still respectful kind of distance in the interaction.)

Ishikawa - (Well what a splendid performance of her song, though just so much warmth and sense of character in just the interactions at the restaurant in just a few minutes.)

Miura - (All pale in comparison supporting wise to Miura, though really I'll save much of my words for the eventual review, because let's just say that Miura's whole sequence was easily my favorite in the film because it managed to cover so many ideas, and Miura is just wonderful himself in the scene in bringing this sort of almost apologetic manner, that also conveys a quiet sorrow, but also nostalgic appreciation, then a natural warmth kind of just to the connection with humanity.)

Razor:

Pulling out the stops in terms of just how grandiose it is at times in the purposefully very emotionally sweeping use of orchestral strings with really emphasis on the dramatic, and for me it wholly works as such. Mixed in with sort of these lighter comedic ditties of sorts for any of the cat hijinks, which again, slight in comparison but also certainly effective. The most memorable aspect of the score are the sort of realm break score elements, where a distinct sound is crafted in the hollowed voices with the strings and the more intense emotional emphasis. An altogether striking score, that would've been my #6 for 2022.

The title song, love the opening of it in the building of the single voice with a poignant single melody, and then the choir of voices on top of each other before building more and adding instrumentation. Creating a beautiful blend between this rather spiritual central vocal, that is balanced with a rather haunting quality of the continued voices that are separate in style as kind of memories in contrast yet not disparate. If I had a criticism, don't love the little interlude of truly random instrument choices briefly in the middle, but don't hate it either.

Calvin Law said...

I'm so looking forward to Yakusho's review.

Louis: would you agree that the film feels almost like a cross between Paterson and Lucky (and just a touch of Paris, Texas too?)

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Yes very much so.

Anonymous said...

Louis when do you intend to watch Zone of Interest, and will you post your top ten after that?

Anonymous said...

Louis: You think there's any chance Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor pulls off a Riseborough 2.0?

Shaggy Rogers said...

Hey guys
Let's play in the dark: tell us who will be Louis's 2023 winners?

Picture: Oppenheimer
Director: Christopher Nolan - Oppenheimer
Actor: Cillian Murphy - Oppenheimer
Actress: Emma Stone - Poor Things
Supporting Actor: Robert Downey Jr. - Oppenheimer
Supporting Actress: Rachel McAdams - Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret
Ensemble: Oppenheimer
Production Design: Killers of the Flower Moon
Sound Editing: Oppenheimer
Sound Mixing: Oppenheimer
Score: Oppenheimer
Editing: Oppenheimer
Visual Effects: Oppenheimer
Costume Design: Killers of the Flower Moon
Cinematography: Killers of the Flower Moon
Makeup and Hairstyling: Poor Things
Original Screenplay: Perfect Days
Adapted Screenplay: Oppenheimer
Song: I have no idea and I'm also very bad at songs

PS: I suspect Lily Gladstone may appear in supporting after review

Luke Higham said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Luke Higham said...

If Gladstone's Supporting, she's definitely taking the win. Poor Things has Costumes and Production Design in the bag. I think Downey Jr. will make top 5 but won't win. I'm going with Ruffalo at the moment.

Emi Grant said...

I wouldn't be surprised if Louis ends up taking to DeNiro more than any of us. He's my bet for Supporting atm.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I have no clue who's going to win Louis's Supporting Actor overall, no clear #1 and #2 like last year with Quan/Dano.

But if I had to wager a guess for his choices in each major category:

Picture: Oppenheimer
Director: Nolan
Actor: Murphy/Yakusho
Actress: Stone
Supporting Actor: De Niro/Downey Jr.
Supporting Actress: McAdams if Gladstone is in Lead
Adapted Screenplay: Poor Things
Original Screenplay: The Holdovers

Tony Kim said...

Somebody refresh my memory, has Louis given his thoughts on Robertson's score for KotFM already?

Matt Mustin said...

Tony: The score might get nominated so I think he's waiting.

Jonathan Williams said...

Louis: What are your ten favorite scores from TV shows.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Honestly I could see Louis giving it to Ruffalo. Truthfully, I'd greatly prefer that to De Niro and Downey.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I found Ruffalo fantastic in Poor Things, but I think Dafoe was even better. Youssef's work is also really staying with me, hope Louis upgrades him.

Matt Mustin said...

I guess I get why some of you are putting Gladstone in supporting but I think she's definitely lead.

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this interview with Javier Aguirresarobe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLSbP-ARME8&t=11s&pp=ygUUamF2aWVyIGFndWlycmVzYXJvYmU%3D

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Which was the first Oscar race you recall closely following?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Personally think Gladstone is lead myself, albeit barely. Also, McAdams is still better even in that race.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

I will definitely be able to watch it at the end of January, but I will take the first opportunity that presents itself. But if I can't see it before the 23rd, I will post my top ten before Oscar nominations.

Anonymous:

Probably not, unless I'm seeing something more prominent than just the director of the film lamenting the lack of buzz, as Origin hasn't made a whisper.

Tony:

Truly really closely (as in precursors and all), was 07.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: did you watch the final episode of The Curse?

Emi Grant said...

Just felt like chiming in to say I'm with Matt and Robert as far as Gladstone being lead (though I find Supporting placements reasonable).

Calvin Law said...

The thing about the Origin situation is I don't necessarily think it would've been a huge contender either way, but I there are genuine gripes to be had with Neon this awards season. Entirely focusing on Anatomy of a Fall does make sense but it is a fairly glaring indictment of the distributor when it has a film with such wide appeal like Perfect Days that is struggling to even make International Film lineups.

Tony Kim said...

I could see the argument for Gladstone being Lead for about the first half of the film, but by the end she became pretty firmly Supporting to me. If she's Lead, then so is De Niro, frankly.

Louis: So Kirsten Dunst was set to play Debbie Harry in a Michel Gondry-directed biopic back in 2007, do you think that casting choice would've worked?

Matt Mustin said...

Tony: It's not a question of screentime, for me. The movie is about Mollie. It follows Ernest, but it is about her.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on Emma Stone in The Curse and where would it rank in her career.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Also thoughts on Nathan Fielder and Benny Safdie in The Curse.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of El Conde.

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

Yes, I know it's divisive, but I loved the big swing.

Luke:

Stone - (A great year for her obviously with this and Poor Things, which are both very different in terms of her performances. Here her performance I think is probably one of the most brilliant renditions of basically a character who is almost completely fake in every way, without becoming one note, which is absolutely amazing work from Stone. Because essentially what Stone is doing is playing on different layers of fakery depending on what level of fakery she needs to do, or who she is being fake to. And with every fake person she is different kind of fake she is playing in playing basically being whatever expectation she needs to be for each person at each different type or place, and that is the greatness of her performance because she manages to be such a character in a completely dynamic way despite never really technically breaking out of this. Stone's final statement on the character is that she is fake, but how she is fake is where she finds the way her character can be fascinating. Because she is wonderfully HGTV fake, where she is everything she needs to be and so gracious, smiling and everything somehow is always great. She's fake socially to her friends, where everything is great, even when the people clearly hate her, she's fake though in being aggressive in being fake, where she is the most intense passive aggressive, she's fake with her husband as the most seasoned manipulator just in different ways, that is completely fascinating in how she is fake, she's fake with Safdie's Dougie, though this is probably where she is the most revealing because in these fake moments Stone is more so playing a game of being fake and having a sense of fun in almost allowing the game to reveal itself that much more. The only time she's ever close to being real is in portraying negative emotions, however even then she is almost quantifying them and using them in some way. It's stellar work at basically finding so many variations of surface level, that she finds depth by being this surface level in so many different ways.)

I don't have too much to say, except everyone is effectively nasty in being every wretched quality and basically just going about amplifying that into all grotesqueries of slight variations. The one standout for me was Gonet, who gets to play that note, but also gets to play another note of overt and comedic effect, which I certainly did enjoy.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Safdie - (His best performance, in what is becoming a growing arsenal for him. Safdie gives an absolutely fascinating performance who perhaps is the hardest to read of the three central characters, yet there is so much within this strange state of the man. On the most immediate surface he portrays the cynical producer who is there just to make a successful show by any means necessary, no matter who it hurts, and there Safdie brings a hilarious smarm, though with a particular sense of confidence in these moments showing as wretched as he is, he's not exactly incorrect in many of his suggestions in terms of the success they'll get with them, and Safdie is wonderfully insidious in the moments of the manipulative showman. Because Safdie really delivers lines in a way all his own, and in that way, he asks these really penetrating horrible questions in unexpected ways that come from the side. But just below that surface we see the scenes of him where he's actively insidious where Safdie brings this vicious intensity in showing really just how rotten he is in his hate towards those seemingly more successful than him at the same time. But even below that though we see that sort of festering hatred he has for himself and the sudden nearly random moments of emotional desperation I loved every time in portraying the man truly in some bizarre state. A state that seemed logical to his own existence, found Safdie consistently hilarious in showing Dougie just being himself in his way, and only in this way that Safdie's unusual approach I think could've made this work in the way that it does.)

Fielder - (Technically falls I think a little into the Larry David, Jerry Seinfeld, where I wouldn't say there's as much acting going on in a traditional sense, at least for most of the series, though Fielder's definitely better than the latter, and I'd also say the former in terms of not quite just successfully being himself. Now part of that is the expected presence, which does sell much of the comedy because he's such an awkward screen presence, yet the nature of this most obvious in that it is done with intention and with purpose, and most of all it works in making him this sore thumb in every situation where it plays to the weaknesses so to speak. BUT as much as this is the setup, when scenes do push him, unlike Seinfeld in particular, Fielder actually does sell them so his performance does go much further than that. This is particularly in the later episodes, where he doesn't completely remove his comedic awkward presence, which already works, but the scenes of showing his character's most intense desperations Fielder does successfully sell and does show genuine emotion within the particular nature stiff frame. And again, all the stiffness works to begin with, but when asked to not be stiff, he does do that as well.)

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: do you think you'll review The Curse on Letterboxd?

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: also, how wo iuld you rank the cast of the show? Sorry if thats a lot of questions

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

1. Stone
2. Benny Safdie
3. Nathan Fielder
4. Hikmah Warsame
5. Dahabo Ahmed
6. Dean Cain (Genius casting, but also surprisingly good)
7. Rachael Ray (No joke, genius use)
8. Gary Farmer
9. Nizhonniya Luxi Austin
10. Barkhad Abdi
11. Vincent Pastore
12. Christopher Calderon
13. Corbin Bernsen
14. Constance Shulman
15. Gigi Erneta

Emi Grant said...

RDJ just won Supporting Actor at the Critic's Choice. The sweep is real.

Calvin Law said...

Yeah, even though Globes and CC aren't industry precursors it has given him two speech opportunities, and with that I think he's close to locking up a win.

Tony Kim said...

Giamatti has won Best Actor at CCA. Cooper is officially now on life support given that he can't even win at a low-rent shindig like that. We should take these even less seriously than the Globes but at least Best Actor is shaping up into a race.

Emi Grant said...

Gotta say, it's fairly interesting how there's no clear winners for Original Screenplay. Barbie won (somehow) at CCA for a category they won't be nominated for at the Oscars.

You'd think this would've been the place to know if The Holdovers or Past Lives are the favorite to win, but nope. Looks like we gotta wait for BAFTA and WGA for that.

Luke Higham said...

Emi: WGA is coming after the Oscars this year.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Critics Choice Award Winners.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I'm good.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: So Kirsten Dunst was set to play Debbie Harry in a Michel Gondry-directed biopic back in 2007, do you think that casting choice would've worked?

Matt Mustin said...

Tony: That would've been perfect.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Thoughts on PTA making a movie w/Dicaprio, Sean Penn & Regina Hall? The Leo-in-Licorice-Pizza thing ended up just being a rumor, but glad that it's happening for real this time.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If you're watching How To Train Your Dragon 2 today, can I have ratings and thoughts on the cast.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Bryan: Finally this meeting will happen.
Will Louis give DiCaprio a victory in the overall with the PTA film?

Shaggy Rogers said...

I don't think anyone has said it yet, do you think it's possible for Scorsese to bring Day Lewis out of retirement for one more film?

Luke Higham said...

Shaggy: If The Wager is to be Scorsese's last major production, then I would love Day-Lewis to come back in a prominent supporting role.

Luke Higham said...

Also, I want him back to get 10 fives in his career.

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

I mean maybe, any musical biopic needs some actual idea beyond the trajectory set by Ray, unfortunately most just stick to the formula, Dunst/Gondry certainly is a decent combination on its own to suggest it could've been something worthwhile.

Bryan:

I mean Hall's pretty much always good, and DiCaprio and Penn can be great in the right circumstance, which with PTA (unless you're like literally two exceptions) always gets good performances out of his actors, so I'm excited, of course you only really needed to say PTA.

Luke:

All the reprises are good. Butler gets a standout moment where his character is romantic with Blanchett, that managed to bring that home in a really quietly warm way that's a tone you don't expect from him.

Hounsou - 2.5(Eh, just felt it was a lot of yelling from him, that's also the character, but didn't find it particularly interesting.)

Blanchett - 4(I have to admit her accent she uses her made me initially here her say in one scene "At least I'm not whoring" instead of "boring" and I was a bit taken aback. Anyway, her work though is very impressive in very invisible at being Blanchett, and effectively creating much nuance that mixes a sense of warmth but also this quiet weight of responsibility within the passion of her character for the dragons.)

Harington - 3.5(In some ways some of his more emotional work as he brings a lot of variety in his performance successfully going from the straight rogue, to the questioning villain to the hero, all through effective shifts in his vocal work.)

Jonathan Williams said...

Louis: Who would've been your preferred directors for Goblet Of Fire, Order Of The Phoenix, Half-Blood Prince and both parts of Deathly Hallows.

Bryan L. said...

Jonathan: He answered that question in the comments section for Michael Smileys' Kill List review.

Jonathan Williams said...

Bryan: Thanks.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Do you read any awards season blogs or discussion forums, like Gold Derby and the Oscar Race subreddit?

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

I used to more closely follow Goldderby, however the nearly unadulterated focus on film only in terms of awards prospects (which I do enjoy obviously), I found a bit tiresome after awhile.

Marcus said...

Louis: Would you say your rating philosophy has slightly changed over the years? I notice that you seem more generous in rating 'adequate' performances than you would have in the past.

Matthew Montada said...

I caught up on American Fiction today. Found it to be a razor-sharp satire with superb acting and writing. The more dramatic story beats worked for me a lot as well.

Jeffrey Wright - 4.5
Tracee Ellis Ross - 3.5
John Ortiz - 3.5
Erika Alexander - 4
Leslie Uggams - 3.5
Adam Brody - 3
Issa Rae - 3.5
Sterling K. Brown - 4/4.5
Myra Lucretia Taylor - 3.5
Keith David - 3.5
Okieriete Onaodowan - 3.5/4

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on these two Looney Tunes gags.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0t5krM8YeI&pp=ygUqdGFrZSBvbmUgc3RlcCBvbiB0aGF0IHJvcGUgYW5kIGknbGwgY3V0IGl0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmP8hJxWbmg&pp=ygUraSBzYXcgYSBndXkgZG8gdGhpcyBpbiBhIHRvb3RocGFzdGUgYWQgb25jZQ%3D%3D

Louis Morgan said...

Marcus:

Of course, partially I stopped considering whether or not the performance was Oscar nominated, as mentioned earlier, I probably would've been harder on Simmons for Being the Ricardos as a nomination when I first started, but now I try to separate a performance from the nomination in terms of quality. But also, what seems to be the case in general, is as one ages you naturally you either get harsher or easier going, I'm fine with being the latter.

8000's:

I mean both excellent bits by the speed of the moment. There's no time to really think, the gag just hits you instantly and hilariously.

Marcus said...

Rhea Seehorn has never won an Emmy for Better Call Saul, truly the most fraudulent awards show of them all.

Louis Morgan said...

Yeah especially since one win was plenty for Coolidge for The White Lotus.

Emi Grant said...

Marcus: This just straight up ruined my whole day, and I was doing great.

Tony Kim said...

That shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. BCS has always been an underdog on the awards circuit, and that wasn't going to change for the final season. Much as I love it, season 6 aired too long ago for it to still be fresh in the minds of Emmy voters, and Succession has basically sucked the air out of the room since then. Personally, I can live with BCS having a legacy closer to a "cult favourite" rather than an awards juggernaut.

Emi Grant said...

Tony: I can't.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

It's hard for me to denounce the Emmys entirely with so much love for Succession, Beef and The Bear, but it's baffling how prone they've become to sweeps in recent years.

Matt Mustin said...

Anyone have thoughts on this potential 1940s Batman cast I thought of?
Batman-Claude Rains
Catwoman-Lauren Bacall
Alfred- Edmund Gwenn
Riddler-Peter Lorre
Penguin-Sydney Greenstreet

Robert MacFarlane said...

What do you think of this 1980's casting of Angels in America?

Prior: Chris Sarandon
Louis: Griffin Dunne
Roy Cohn: Robert Loggia
Belize/Mr. Lies: Giancarlo Esposito
Harper: Lisa Eichhorn
Joe: Victor Garber
Hannah/Ethel: Geraldine Paige
The Angel: Joanne Woodward

Matt Mustin said...

Robert: Oooh Robert Loggia is PERFECT.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Since you've no intention of watching The Amazing Spider-Man (2012), your thoughts on this scene.

youtube.com/watch?v=61XnpbwnNL8&pp=ygUadGhlIGFtYXppbmcgc3BpZGVyIG1hbiBiZW4%3D

Calvin Law said...

Louis: thoughts on the direction of Fallen Leaves?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Matt: I just thought to myself "Sandpaper voice... EUREKA!"

8000S said...

Louis: What do you think of a 40's Face/Off with Bogart and Cagney in the main roles? For a 50's, Douglas and Lancaster?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on Tommila and Hennie in Sisu

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the "God Only Knows" scene/argument from Love & Mercy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmLbEEVwlMo&ab_channel=JoshBusfieldakabitterphase

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Direction defined by a purposefully muted approach with kind of the overt romanticism of the piece lingering in every frame without being the center of it, in a fascinating way. As so much is framing our characters at a distance from each other, or just lounging around, however shot and lit with an overtly vibrant quality to this lounging that is distinctly romantice. They speak to each other with distance, however careful is the frame to capture the glances in these longer takes of making sure we see the romance even as they refuse to overtly indicate any of it. The only thing admitting to it is the wonderful musical choices that do denote that romantic feeling. Although all the same as much as romance is on the edge of the frame, so is hardship, as the news of the Ukraine/Russia war is as frequent as the music as a counterbalance, and as much as we see the moments are waiting to breakout, the sudden moments of hardship are awaiting as expectedly in the mix. A work of contrasts, contrasts that magnificently make something singular in the end.

Luke:

Well just like the Gwen/Peter moments, the family drama moments aren't bereft of potential, Field, Sheen and Garfield are certainly very genuine in the opening scene and the later one. BUT, the whole direction of how Ben's killer unfolds is so shoddy quite frankly, and just kind of frankly bad looking that it undermines even a straightforward scene, though Garfield does sell the key moment, I'm left more distant for how we got there.

Tommila - 3(He's perfectly fine in some of the physical acting, but I didn't ever think he was more than fine. I certainly did not quite really feel I came into the mental space of his character, and still felt just like a generalized idea than a genuine person or if a mythical being fighting the Nazis, I might've accepted either. Almost more of an action figure doing various things, which Tommila delivers on a basic level but never more than that for me.)


Hennie - 2(Felt he was pretty underwhelming here. I mean pick a lane, as he neither makes a genuinely compelling villain where he's got some real depth and motivation, nor does he make him entertaining as just a "magnificent bastard". He's kind of vague, therefore forgettable, and worst of all really removes the proper catharsis one should want from the climax of the piece.)

8000's:

I mean sure, I feel Douglas and Lancaster would be particularly eager to imitate one another.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on Fargo Season 5 with cast ranking.

And your TV top tens.

8000S said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Ebert/Siskel stand ins in Emmerich's Godzilla?

Rather petty of Emmerich to have parodies of them in his movie just because they didn't like Independence Day.

Also, how did he not have Godzilla kill them both?

Jonathan Williams said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Sound Editing of The Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: How familiar were you with Fielder prior to The Curse, and your take on the ending.

Matthew Montada said...

Louis: ratings for the cast of Riceboy Sleeps?

Mitchell Murray said...

Extremely random throwback, but this idea came to me today, and it relates to Calvin's old blogspot, actually.

Lets wind the clock back to 2016, specifically the supporting actor race. I recall reading Calvin's take on the field, which ended with a little bonus section ranking the nominee's hair/beard styles (which Dev Patel wins easily IMO).

Anyways, at the risk of bringing up a odd or embarassing memory for you, Calvin, how would more recent acting races fare in that catagory? I can say personally that if my hair was thicker, I would try an copy Adam Driver (either nod) or Steven Yeun.

Louis Morgan said...

Will get to all requested thoughts in the next post.