Friday, 24 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Park Hae-il in Decision to Leave

Park Hae-il did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Det. Jang Hae-jun in Decision to Leave. 

Decision to Leave is the captivating neo-noir of a detective dealing with the mysterious wife of a man who fell off a mountain. 

Park Hae-il fills a classical role, mixed in with a whole lot of different ideas from this genre as crafted by Park Chan-wook. You have at the center very much the lead of so many noirs, as the straightlaced detective whose moral state is questioned by a femme fatale, a bit of very directly the detectives from both versions of Insomnia, and of course a strong dose of Jimmy Stewart from Vertigo. We open the film fittingly then with Park as the upright detective, against his less-so partner Soo-wan, as they go about their duties in the police department. Park's performance leans into the strait lace in the way of just a very precise man as he goes about his initial duties. He speaks to Soo-wan with an innate kind of authority as he speaks about their ongoing investigation of a known murder. That is wrapped around the idea of the character being constantly in a state of insomnia. Park makes this a fundamental aspect of his performance, as there is just some pressure within him that speaks to this at all times. He succeeds importantly in making it a given in always seeming at least slightly tired in these opening scenes, and showing a man where there is just a cloud over him. He doesn't overdo it, doesn't make it too severe, but rather creates the quiet sense of the man's burdens in his job wrapped within this state. 

We see his theoretical solace with his wife Jung-an (Lee Jung-hyun), a nuclear power plant worker who lives away from the big city, where Jang visits only on the weekends. This relationship is interesting because it isn't quite the obvious bad relationship you might see in a lesser version of this story. Rather Jung-an is perfectly loving towards Jang in an often very flirtatious way even if in a slightly overbearing way in which she kind of diagnoses him and makes regular check-ins regarding the state of their relationship. Park doesn't present Jang's manner in this relationship as anything that is not pure in the stance of just trying to love Jung-an back as much as he can, as he makes always make dinner for them and certainly frequently attentively listens to her. Park doesn't present as something that is actively weighing on him in any way, however, what Park manages to do with his performance is show the way this relationship is very much a passive one for Jang. He shows that Jang is very much listening to his wife, but in a way too often just listening to the point she is always the one talking without really the natural give and take you might expect. Park presents the way Jang very much differs just into a state of malaise, not of one that seems actively painful, but at the same time, there is not the sense of comfort or intrigue in it either. They are together, but it isn't a sense of a striking connection by any means. 

What Park effectively does between the at-home scenes and his working scenes is show the contrast between the two sides of Jang and in a way show that at home Jang is very different, maybe too different, from his existence at work. Because at work, even with the sense of the man's insomnia, Park shows a man much more active and assured in his manner. He presents Jang as very much a detective with conviction as he goes about his task, and creates the right striking presence of someone with that innate drive within his profession. When he discovers a man who has died falling off a mountain even, Jang investigates this by going up the mountain the same way, and in presenting this Park's performance is very much of this sense of calculation and care to his approach as an investigator. Park does what is really essential for any great portrayal of a detective whom we are following, which is to bring the audience into his sense of investigative thinking, so we are with the detective rather than just merely watching him. Park achieves is this in any scene where Jang and his partner are investigating it is never just simple reaction shots from him, rather he consistently creates the potent sense of Jang's mind taking the various clues in and trying to decipher what it is that is going on at this crime scene. He manages within his performance to create the appropriate sense of the investigative mind that defines who detective Jang is. 

The key complication of the film is the death of the man which leads Jang and his partner to look at his much younger wife, also a Chinese immigrant, Song Seo-rae (Tang Wei). And this is the central relationship within the film which develops itself in very unexpected ways throughout the film. In the beginning, she is just a suspect, however, Park's performance effectively plants the seeds right away just in his reactions to seeing Seo-rae where there is this subtle sense of captivation in her. It could be mistaken for just the suspicion of a detective but soon it is clear more than that. We see this initially through the contrasting opinions of the case between the more seasoned and professional Jang, against his fairly slobbish partner Soo-wan (Go Kyung-pyo), who may be a bit of a slob however his suspicions about Seo-rae do make some good points. Park's performance is terrific in being able to find the nuance in this state of denial in approaching it as such. For example denies her lack of obvious grief with a bit of a poetic aside, which Park delivers with sincerity but sincerity that alludes to fascination. When asking her to do anything to get more information for the investigation, Park speaks every word with kindness, perhaps too much kindness, and an obviously kind of strict sort of patience. 

The development of the relationship between the two is quite fascinating because it isn't initially this standard sort of chemistry between the two. Rather initially it is of the flirtation between the surface. Such as when Park takes a more intimate photo of injuries she has sustained from her husband. Park initially falls into this expected professional routine of calling in a policewoman to handle the photo and is perfectly awkward in trying to avoid the more overt sexual nature of the moment. When Seo-rae balks at the suggestion, Park's reaction denotes this internalized intrigue in the act and the growth of an essential fascination with her even while technically going about his duty. And what we see Park cultivate in the successive scenes of further investigation, prodded on by Soo-wan who thinks Jang is smitten with the woman, we see in Park's performance a particularly potent combination in the act of observation. It is great to work as performed because Park is able to convey still Park's attempt to maintain his professional distance, however, when observing her there is this combination of a building intensity of obsession and this strange kind of comfort when observing her. Park doesn't present it as an obvious lust but rather the man experiencing some notions that he simply doesn't get from seeing his wife, and Parks shows Jang being pulled into woman's allure. 

Importantly in this progression towards obsession, we do see Jang still very much the professional in another seemingly more straightforward murder investigation where we see him take down one of the men with a strict sense of determination and really aliveness within the act. We see him further admonish Soo-wan less than deft hand at faulty interrogation, and Park is great in his delivery of the correcting description with a specific sense of duty within it. His eyes are disappointed towards Soo-wan as a teacher disappointed in a student going in the wrong direction. In all of this, we see Jang as the investigator a man in his wheelhouse who is great at his job. And with Seo-rae we see the meeting of the world of the potentially romantic with this world. And the interaction between the two really is about all the little moments of interaction that build towards something more substantial. That is in a suggestive glance, but also just the way the two eat a sushi meal together. I love the performance of Wei and Park in this scene because it isn't about going big in any kind of lust in that moment, rather the sense of this strict sort of pleasant comfort between the two in what is a normal act, made less so by circumstance but not by the process in which we see the two go about it. 

Seo-rae ends up becoming more than suspect, not as an obvious sort of lust-filled interest, but rather a genuine romantic interest as the two progress. As the two connect not based on overt sexuality but rather a connection of personal interest. And the two's chemistry is unusual because the development is more gradual almost as we see them through the first few dates of a relationship where both parties are a little bit reserved. Take just the moment when Park takes in their mutual interest in the sea, where Jang doesn't hold on to it long just long enough to appreciate it. Then when she visits his apartment, providing guidance on a murder investigation, the sheer energy in the expression of the act we see Park as a new man in some respects. When he cooks for her there is so much spirit to it, far less than a domestic chore. When she provides some ASMR to help get him to sleep, Park expresses the purest form of a man finding true relaxation in her lullaby of sorts. The performances of both Wei and Park in their sort of "date" scene are amazing to work because each, especially Park who shows Jang isn't trying to get anything extra out of it other than be with her, put so little weight in the scene. Rather if you took the scene in isolation it could nearly be just a wonderful full date between the two, as at the moment they no longer feel like detective and suspect but something far more. 

And for the rest of the review to go on a spoiler alert is essential to dive into the intricacies of it, as both murder investigations come to a head. The first is the street gangster which just deserves mention for Park's performance which is so different from the rest of his performance but it wholly works at the moment. When he has the criminal dead to rights but is still threatened with a weapon, Jang distracts him by noting his romantic concerns, and Park shifts his delivery wholly to something kind of overtly romantic and of a different man from Jang. As almost a comic moment that wholly works though as we see it as a play, even if there seems some genuine emotion in it, as Jang basically says "psyche" and shoots the man to drop him quickly. The other is the investigation of Seo-rae, which is first closed as a suicide, however by chance further evidence proves that she in fact did kill her husband, while also destroying key evidence seemingly having manipulated Jang to help her do this. Park is outstanding in the confrontation scene because of how bluntly he expresses he presents the feeling of betrayal. The betrayal though is wrapped not in hate but actually in a sense of love in it. Park's delivery of Jang's frustration isn't as negatively inclined as it probably should be rather he effectively shows the profound effect Seo-rae has had on him by just how lost he is in every word. Park shows a man who unfortunately is still obsessed by Seo-rae and broken for it. 

To escape it all Jang moves to a smaller city with his wife, where the relationship really is even less than it was before, though again I appreciate that Park doesn't overplay this discontent. Rather he shows this sense of resignation as she continues to make all sorts of suggestions for him and we see a man just going through the motions, and indeed perhaps dying a bit inside at every turn. Unfortunately, things only get more complicated when Seo-rae appears with a new husband and the couple meet each other at a fish market. This is low-key one of Park's best scenes because he is able to say so much really in every moment of it. This is from his subdued yet still the extremely potent reaction to seeing Seo-rae and embodies still his fascination with her, the surprise of seeing her, and the desperate frustration within himself associated with her. My favorite aspect is Park's performance as a reflection to see how he is with his wife around others. Where he is nearly a husk who just directly repeats anything she particularly would like to hear from him, without any real passion but just the slightest hint of a husbandly duty that propels him through it. Park in the moment though shows the sorry state of Jang in the moment who just is completely lost in this relationship and in this city at this point. 

Matter quickly get more complicated as Seo-rae's new husband is also found dead. Park is amazing in the scene of the investigation in being just completely fed up with her at first, and just exuding this pent-up frustration in thinking she's purposefully played him again. Where now Jang was slow peddling the suspicion towards her, Park now exuding a determined suspicion since really he does know better, despite his small-time new partner, who also hero-worships him, wanted to take Seo-rae at her word not knowing any better. This investigation to doesn't go the expected way, and Park is incredible in embodying the immediate switches, and the emotional swings of Jang throughout this sequence. Where his performance is outstanding is the fact that he never gets lost for a moment, nor does one moment seem too sudden to the next. As his determination changes to release his old fascination with Seo-rae again, as she insists there was genuine feeling between them. Park's reaction in the scene is great because he doesn't show himself going to their old state, even when kissing her, in that he is almost in this state of arrested emotional development in being just wholly lost on how exactly to react as his eyes denote the feelings for her are unquestionably strong yet still is the state of frustration over the past betrayal. 

Jang through this still trying to investigate properly, where he finds Seo-rae didn't kill her husband but did kill someone else to lead to her husband's death. In each revelation Park now shows the building towards the climax of the film, as every bit of the sheer complication of this relationship is in Park's increasingly frantic and really broken state, which only exacerbates things his wife leaves him based on her suspicions of an affair. Park shows the man as no longer able to really hold himself together through his duties as a detective, even as all of it leads to the revelation that Seo-rae is a murderer, but also did love him. Leading to a final scene of Jang desperately trying to find her, unbeknownst to him she has already set up her suicide. Park is astonishing in this scene because he shows all of it come out in this moment, and is this earned release of everything Jang has been holding out. Park now shows Jang wearing his desperation, his obsession for her, his love for her but also the tragedy of losing her in this moment. Park makes Jang this complete mess and is heartbreaking in showing the man truly just lost both in terms of finding her and completely emotionally as he searches for the woman who broke his very existence. This is a masterful performance by Park Hae-il, because he never gets lost in the narrative even when the character technically often is. He brings us so tangibly into this man's state, through every facet of his investigation but also more importantly his obsession. 

24 comments:

Shaggy Rogers said...

My final prediction for top 10

1. Farrell
2. Park
3. Nighy
4. Mescal
5. Fiennes
6. Skarsgard
7. Kammerer
8. Chalamet
9. Rylance
10. Bajestani

Shaggy Rogers said...

Another actor from Park Chan Wook who will take #2 overall

Calvin Law said...

Amazing performance, and how could I not agree with every word here? That final scene is one of the best acted scenes I've seen in awhile. In addition to everything you've said, I love how surprisingly hilarious his work is at points - the way he runs when chasing after the suspect, the turtle scene.

Louis: your thoughts on the direction, cinematography and editing (which I agree is *so* good at putting you in the mind of the insomniac) of the film.

Calvin Law said...

I also love the contrast between this review and Park's first review for Memories of Murder in terms of the kinds of characters that play.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Astounding portrayal of obsession, easily my #2 of the year (and I suspect he is at least #2 for you as well).

Louis: Your thoughts on Tang, and your updated top 10 films of the year.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: And your thoughts on the ending of this film (love the payoff of translations, voice messages, and everything that just leads up to that beach sequence).

Anonymous said...

Who are your best leading and supporting actress nominees 2010-2019?

Anonymous said...

Louis what is your director top ten?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Easily my second favorite performance of the year after Farrell.

Aidan Pittman said...

Loved this performance as well and of course the whole film. And wholly agree with Calvin in just how funny he was at times, I was really impressed by how well he realizes the range of the material. Honestly might be my own Lead Actor win if not Farrell.

Tony Kim said...

Very good review, one of my new faves of yours.

Have you seen, or do you have any plans to see, any of the following recent films:
We're All Going to the World's Fair
Descendant
Barbarian
Happening

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Astonishing work.

Happening is a 2021 release.

Do you intend to see Creed III soon.

Oliver Menard said...

The first time I saw this film I knew Park would be my favorite performance of the year. Might be my #1 of the decade so far.

Louis: Your top 10 directing moments for Park Chan-wook.

Mitchell Murray said...

So, random note here, but I finished the second season of "The Crown" tonight. I must admit, it took me a lot longer to complete the second season than the first, which I fear might be a recurring trend later on. One of the initial appeals of the series was learning about a period in the royals history I wasn't overly familiar with (lates 40s-mid 60s). Now that we're getting into more contemporary events, though, I wonder how much speculative writing/ploting is going to jump out to me. I also must say, and this really speaks to the quality of his performance...I did miss John Lithgow as Churchill; He was a major asset to the first season, and gave a striking take on the man that also didn't shy from some of his shortcomings.

Now having said all that...seaoson two is still a strong bit of TV. It's held back by pacing and many individuals/events being sidelined, but what is given focus is presented effectively. There is a consistent attempt (and a largely successful one) to discuss the significance and contradictions of the Royals. Again, for someone who was worrying the show might be a fluff piece, I'm glad certain levels of grey are being brought up. I'm also going to miss Claire Foy's splendid performance as Elizabeth, which is equal parts a strong physical embodiment and a finely observed dramatic turn.

Aidan Pittman said...

Got to see the Oscar nominated animated shorts. A good batch this year even if the apparent frontrunner has incredibly on-the-nose writing and The Flying Sailor is basically just exactly what it sounds like. Still great looking across the board and appreciated the visual storytelling and experimentation of the ones utilizing them the most.

1. Ice Merchants (on YouTube and *highly* recommended)
2. My Year of Dicks (on Hulu)
3. An Ostrich Told Me the World is Fake and I Think I Believe It (on Vimeo)
4. The Flying Sailor (on YouTube)
5. The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse (on Apple TV+)

Emi Grant said...

I might have to re-watch this one because I was quite sleep deprived when I first watched it and didn't really vibe with the third act at all (outside of the ending, which felt appropriately haunting).

Park might be on my Top 3 for Best Actor, but it looks like I might've taken a thing or two for granted on his performance just from reading this review.

Calvin Law said...

Aidan: Agree that Ice Merchants should be winning this category easily, so good.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: retro castings for Park based on his work here?

RatedRStar said...

I still get a kick out of Riz Ahmeds reaction to reading the Best Short nominees lol.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Park's direction, as typical for Park, is really using every element to craft a mental and emotional state of mind in the viewer that is reflective of his main character. That's with big swings and small ones in terms of his choices as a director. For example, the production design here isn't something that screams its presence, but it is brilliant design work, particularly if you look at Jang and Seo-rae's apartments that don't just tell us something about the characters, it actually enforces a certain subconscious suggestion like in the mountain/ocean wallpaper. I love Park's small sort of choices of normalcy here that in some ways I think harken back most to Joint Security Area, in terms of the joy of life. Here is the attention to food for example, and the act of making food, as he wants us to appreciate what joy Jang is able to derive from that. Or keeping a simple moment like Seo-rae's and Jang's cleaning up together after their fancy sushi dinner, a scene that itself could seem unneeded, yet speaks strangely so much to their connection in the moment. He's also about the big swings with his choices in the editing that rarely lets the viewer collectively breathe, the cinematography that is beautiful to look at but too creates this kinetic and dynamic quality both which place us within Jang's particular state of mind so tangibly. His overall choices though are a fascinating combination of slick neo-noir energy, but here with that intensity of a doomed romantic blend. Park makes very emphasized and remarkable choices of when to pull back, like the "Date" scene, which makes a profound impact, or heightens all the more as with the final minutes of the film.

The cinematography by Kim Ji-young (who also shot A Bittersweet Life) is just gorgeous to begin with, as typical for Park films anyways, which always gives you such a keen sense of environmental feeling. Whether that be the sense of the height of the mountain, or really even the chilled air of the beach, or the right in the day. Every choice realizes this whether it is just careful framing or the specific lighting and grading choices that evoke so much almost again at the subconscious level of understanding. Of course, it is also just so dynamically shot just disregarding what it achieves, as it pinpoints every figure in a shot so potently in a way that creates either connection or isolation so powerfully. Or the camera movements here that so often create some feeling of intention, often of obsession, which are so remarkable. Every shot is basically amazing in one way or another, but they are also always amazing with some kind of purpose.

Louis Morgan said...

The editing is showy in the right way, and like another one of my favorite edited films of the year, The Fabelmans, the editing itself contributes to again crafting a specific mental space, though in both films very differently. Here is the near constant cutting, and not just the cutting, but also the rare holds at the ends of the scene that is more typical. These transitions in most films might even describe as rough. But that is entirely the point here as it crafts that insomniac state where it isn't so much about being sleepy but rather about constantly having to think, and we see that process in every constant cut. And that is brilliantly realized because only do we really slow down in the overtly romantic scenes where it seems like Jang is finding solace do we too get solace. In contrast that near the end when his life is falling apart, the edit becomes more frantic as it forces you into this state of unease so well.

Tahmeed:

The ending is indeed this, I wouldn't say elegant in that part of what makes it so powerful is because of how frantic it is, but this natural coherence of every thread within the plot just about, with more so the emotional realization of everything that Jang has been going through to basically finally have him explode emotionally in such a way, that we see performed, we also though see in his isolation in the cinematography and we are there with him as the editing makes it seem like we have enough time even though we've already lost.

Tang - (Her performance is in itself the mystery at the center of the film, and it would've been very easy to be too obtuse or too obscured with the performance. Tang's performance though finds just the ideal consistently in terms of giving us clues but keeping us wanting more throughout the film. Because at first she just seems kind of cold and uncaring as the wife of the dead man, though with these moments of notable allure, she plays actually so well by not putting too much on them. She offers just a moment to entice what is it that is really going on with her. There is the sense of the strange intrigue that she crafts by being so wonderfully enigmatic in moments where she could be flirtatious or not, she could be sinister or not, effortlessly balancing these moments to pull us in, but never to tell exactly what is going on either. The scenes of her being closer to Jang, and seeming well just straightforward are ideal because she does seem sincere (and the truth is that she largely is in the end), however by what we know of the character we cannot be sure. Tang tells the truth in these scenes and on re-watch in particular you see even as she technically has ulterior motives the emotion, interest, and overall more giving manner are the genuine truth about her despite technically being manipulations still. In the after-the-move scenes, she too is great in the fish market scene by presenting one way as kind of the seemingly blithe woman, while in every glance giving so much more than that when looking upon Jang and his wife. The dissection of what is going on Tang manages to be frustrating again in the right way as you cannot trust anything about her, yet Tang still manages to make you question the moments of her character both believing her or believing her to be a lie. She successfully ropes you in so artfully that she still entices you while not fully giving it away, until the very end where she delivers the fundamental truths of the character so simply yet so powerfully, in a moment where nothing is hidden, but the method in which we receive in turn is so haunting because of it.)

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

I haven't seen those (Happening is indeed 2021 for me), but I do intend to check out a few more 2022 films in the interim between when I'm finished with the alternates and the Oscars.

Anonymous:

Check any results page for the alternates of a given year and you'll find my female lineups.

Anonymous:

I'm going to save that one for the results.

Luke:

When it comes out near me.

Oliver:

Park (Who really has great directing moments even in films I don't love):

1. The Elevator - Oldboy
2. The Beach - Decision to Leave
3. Scrapbook - Oldboy
4. Climbing the mountain/Solving the crime - Decision to Leave
5. The Basement - The Handmaiden
6. The truth of the Lady - The Handmaiden
7. Hallway Fight - Oldboy
8. Collective vengeance - Lady Vengeance
9. Mania in the "hotel" room - Oldboy
10. Family Photo - JSA

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Jeff Bailey
Dr. Harvey
Harry Caul

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Decision to Leave 1940's directed by John Huston:

Detective: Humphrey Bogart
Widow: Claire Trevor
Wife: Gladys George
Partner 1: Dan Duryea
Parnter 2: Thelma Ritter

Decision to Leave 1950's directed by Alfred Hitchcock:

Detective: James Stewart
Widow: Kim Novak
Wife: Vera Miles
Partner 1: Wendell Corey
Parnter 2: Mercedes McCambridge

Decision to Leave 1960's directed by Masaki Kobayashi:

Detective: Tatsuya Nakadai
Widow: Yoshiko Yamaguchi
Wife: Machiko Kyo
Partner 1: Mikijirō Hira
Parnter 2: Kyoko Kagawa