Sunday 5 February 2023

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2022: Nicholas Hoult in The Menu

Nicholas Hoult did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Tyler in The Menu. 

Let's think about a very tall man, a man with an eye for talent, and the ability to appreciate greatness, however, lacks the ability to achieve himself. No, not Adam McKay, though I think "Adam's bullshit" would be a much more accurate name for Don't Look Up, and would like to fashion a version of reality where he tries to explain his satirical brilliance to Stanley Kubrick, however no let's talk about Tyler performed by Nicholas Hoult. Nicholas Hoult, who, probably would not have been the first person I would've named as someone I would've willingly, in fact enthusiastically, reviewed for four separate performances at the outset of this endeavor. However, Hoult once again has proven, that put him in a proper character role, and not as a boring leading character, and you've got something special on your hands. That is the case once again in The Menu, as seemingly one of our entry characters along with his date "Margot" (Anya Taylor-Joy) go on a special course meal in a private island restaurant along with many rich patrons. However, that is not the intention of Tyler as a character, who really is best examined with spoilers in mind, since this performance plays all the better when you know from the outset that Tyler knows that, this special "menu" is planned with the head chef Julian Slowik (Ralph Fiennes) planning a murder-suicide of all guests and his staff by the end of it. 

Hoult's performance is the most comedic performance in the film, which overall is a satire, however, his work doesn't approach really to any real drama. Hoult in the earliest scenes portrays the most fervent passion for food which Hoult presents as this point of fixation and the only point of concern as he speaks on every single thing regarding this interest of his. Hoult's performance conveys this single-minded focus quite hilariously as really a very nerdy overt enthusiasm for everything that is far too much at all times. Just from his wide eyes about everything that he hears about the food, and the sort of dreamy look he gives as he sees the dishes and upon Slowik as the purest of idols for him. Even the way Hoult performs consuming the food speaks to this and he is hilarious by just how much joy and how much he gets out of every bite that he takes. Hoult shows that Tyler is experiencing more than just satisfaction with every bite, every bite has this obsessive quality within his work, speaking towards a certain kind of demented madness that defines the character. Also defines him as just being hilarious as every little aside from Hoult is funny in presenting just how single-minded Tyler is about everything, and just how much he reveres Julian Slowik as a godlike figure to him. Something that Hoult has previous experience with here, however here presented even more humorously in every little glance of his of overt deep fascination with the word of the man, or even the mouthing of the same information as though he is evoking genius. 

As the night becomes all the direr for the guests, Hoult's performance in a way becomes funnier, though, in terms of that, it is really just the context of the situation where Tyler is insane and only cares about the food even though as people are being maimed or killed around him. Hoult's little bits of insertion though are pointed bits of comedy because of the contrast of his work against everyone else who conveys at least some hint of horror to their situation. Hoult's performance is wonderfully oblivious at all times, and really the only time he shows any genuine horror is when Margot expresses her dissatisfaction with the meal. Hoult's petulant frustration and horror, which is so disregarded again is comically cruel as he emphasizes how nothing matters to Tyler except the food and approval from Slowik. We see Tyler try to get as he names aspects of the food such as identifying part of the tea with such enthusiasm, that is hilarious as it comes in otherwise such a tension-filled moment around Tyler. All actions of Tyler are food fixation to the point even when the guests have the chance to escape, we see Tyler only wanting to get back in to have what the female guests were afforded, with Hoult presenting this longing as he sees the food. Eventually, he gets paid attention to as Slowik reveals that Tyler got in with the knowledge of the true nature of the night, initially receiving praise from Slowik, which Hoult's nodding, like a well-trained dog is pure gold, lapping up any praise he gets. Unfortunately, just as when a previous Hoult character idolized someone, things don't go well when he is put to the test, and that happens here as Slowik gives Tyler the chance to make a meal. Hoult's reactions are all pitch perfect as his physical manner becomes nearly petrified and his line deliveries of a man completely lost in this state of extreme anxiety. Hoult's complete fumbling in every moment is the perfection of failure as his face is a man completely overwhelmed. When Slowik tears down not only Tyler's terrible meal, but everything about Tyler, the face of resignation in Hoult is again one more bit of pure comedic gold, as it isn't depression, it is a man whose whole concept of existence has been shattered into this deep pit of sorrow, however, pitched in just the right way to be hilarious in this moment of hopelessness. A delightful performance by Hoult through and through, and just another reminder that the more Hoult we get in oddball supporting roles, the better. 

49 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Thoughts on the cast and any upgrades.

Calvin Law said...

Love his work here, my second favourite performance of the cast after Chau. Knowing Tyler's whole deal makes everything he does even funnier on rewatch.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: thoughts on this retro cast for The Menu (circa 90s/00s)?

Chef Slowik: Miguel Ferrer
Margot: Sheryl Lee
Tyler: Kyle MacLachlan
Elsa: Joan Chen
Lillian: Piper Laurie
Ted: Richard Beymer

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this films’ screenplay & direction.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Very entertaining performance that verged on being the highlight of the film for me.

Michael McCarthy said...

Calvin:

Richard: Russ Tamblyn
Anne: Mary Jo Deschanel
Movie Star: Ian Buchanan
Felicity: Sherilyn Fenn
Bryce, Soren & Dave: Dana Ashbrook, James Marshall & Eric DaRe
Katherine: Lara Flynn Boyle (think Wayne’s World)
Jeremy: Lenny von Dohlen

Michael McCarthy said...

Actually, Wendy Robbie for Anne. And while we’re at it, David Patrick Kelly as the Sommelier.

Matt Mustin said...

Very enjoyable performance, and yes the revelations make it even better on rewatch. Fiennes is still easy MVP for me though, and in fact his performance got better on rewatch too for me.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

I'm actually contemplating increasing his rating to 5 at some point. There's something bizarrely poetic about a guy who is the only one calm amidst all the chaos, but solely beacuse he has become so obsessed with an already unhinged "Master" figure. Hoult couldn't have portrayed this mindset in a better way.

Mitchell Murray said...

Still haven't seen this movie, but I've heard decent enough things for it all around, so I'll keep it on the watchlist.

As for Hoult, I would agree that prior to 2015, I wouldn't have expected him to deliver such entertaining supporting work so consistently. I'm still not sure he needed a review for "True History of the Kelly Gang" (though he's solid there), but certainly "Mad Max: Fury Road" and "The Favourite" show some of his best work.

And yeah...it's kind of strange that Hoult's the same height as Adam Driver, Chris Hemsworth and Michael Shannon, but that doesn't usually show itself in his physical presence.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this review of Glass Onion? Judging by your LB reviews of the film I think you may find this interesting.

https://www.alternateending.com/2022/12/glass-onion-2022.html

Robert MacFarlane said...

Hoult seems to really excel in playing overconfident nincompoops.

Marcus said...

Love that Adam Mackay periodically catches strays on this blog, even when he doesn't have a film out. Never change, Louis.

Matt Mustin said...

Marcus: McKay produced The Menu, so he's fair game.

RatedRStar said...

Anytime I hear about this movie I just desperately want a burger now, just like with Nightmare Alley where I fancied a full English breakfast lol.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

I'll be fine with occasional digs at McKay even when these won't be related to the reviews in question.

Oliver Menard said...

Hoult is one of my favorites to watch from his generation. One of the best supporting players in the game today. He's excellent here.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Wouldn't ever want to take that role away from Jesse Plemons, but do you think Hoult would have been a good fit for Todd in Breaking Bad? The callous disregard for human life he displayed here as Tyler (although played more for comedy) made me think he could have been interesting.

8000S said...

Louis: How do you think Mitchum would fare as either Bud White or Jack Vincennes?

Houndtang said...

I watched One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest again today. I was pretty sure that Will Sampson had been nominated for Supporting Actor and was surprised when I checked and saw it was only Dourif who was. Was Sampson in contention for a nod do we think?

Matt Mustin said...

Houndtang: No.

Calvin Law said...

Houndtang: He definitely should've been, but that was a pretty competitive year. When I think about what I love about the film, Sampson's performance is always up there and I think he's definitely an underrated element of the film. Plus, would've been cool to get an indigenous actor some rep.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I'd give all the collective guests up to a 3.5, I think everyone actually has a little bit of a moment on re-watch and was more impressed by the ensemble as a whole.

and upgrades for

Taylor-Joy - 4.5(Re-watching it I valued her performance all the more as an essential anchor within the piece and consistently acting as very much a straight human to invest in against the overall concept. Her performance though is particularly good in portraying real calculation and thought without always having to say it. She reveals a lot just in careful reaction and is able to convey "Margot" thought process to earn very much her method of escape.)

Chau - 4.5(Speaks to her talent that really both performances of the year show two different successes. One of her realistic more substantial turn, in terms of screentime, in managing to bring real life to the melodrama of a bad script, and doing her most with a broad character with a lot less in terms of how much she is given on the page. She is wonderfully demented and particularly as she shows what a certain tweak in delivery can be. That is she just sounds so intense in her descriptions as any guide would be but is just that much more intense in her way. She brings the right sort of insanity within the controlled intensity that is just wonderful, while also being genuinely quite threatening consistently.)

Calvin & Michael:

Love it. MacLachlan would in particular fit Tyler like a glove.

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

The screenplay is the film's greatest asset, and there's plenty to praise about the film in general and SHOULD'VE had Triangle of Sadness's spot, I film I even like. As THIS is how you do a class commentary. Because it doesn't use it as a cheat code for "dumb rich" and actually manages the flaws of its individuals much more artfully as the seven deadly sins in a way that naturally reveals character. On re-watch in particular, I actually was all the more impressed by how well the screenplay establishes everyone not just Julian, Tyler, and Margot. it isn't just a single beat, in each conversation, particularly if you compare it to a film made by Tyler or Triangle, you do get a sense of each group as real people, even if technically the flaws define them in this situation. The flaws though are articulated particularly well, with enough naturalism in these interactions even as it is a comic satire. And I think again, the screenwriters don't single note "rich are dumb" or something simple, they find variations within the commentary on each person as a different variation but also more so on the idea of "high class" restaurant and foodie culture. That is while being extremely well realized in developing the structure through the courses of the menu, effectively ratcheting tensions and again through that finding variation in its themes while just telling on the surface a compelling thriller situation. On that particular note, the interplay between the two most developed characters, Margot and Julian, is fantastic as it explores more of each so naturally, and while doing that intertwines with it how Margot can potentially survive. Her learning the way isn't just one picture, but we actually see through her more rounded commentary on the food throughout the film. Also, it's incredibly funny, every little Tyler aside but particularly the exact reasoning behind Julian's ire towards the movie star and his conversation with his assistant.

Louis Morgan said...

Having said that it could've been bungled actually if a director I think sought to put their own personal stamp on it too directly, or overemphasize what is in the script. For example, I think certain filmmakers, like the original choice Payne, would've made all the characters more cartoony and encouraged the actors to overplay their roles. I also think many might've made a mistake by playing Slowik as some avenging angel. Mylod, who is best known as a television director, on the other hand, finds the right tone by having most of the cast play it straight and finding the places to accentuate the extremes in right places. Mylod's work is tight for the lack of a better word, cutting out some extra and really unneeded bits in the script, not a criticism of the script by the way just praise for intelligent direction. Mylod seems to know the situation itself is ridiculous enough that to overplay in that way would be to the detriment and his choices to be more direct, more realistic in terms of some more general choices, allows there to be tension however tension subverted with the humor within the tension. He artfully never compromises either. In part, I think in a way he takes a lot of the more ridiculous potential moments and increases tension in them. For example, the whole "Yes CHEF" could've been silly but it is genuinely probably the scariest thing in the film by the way Mylod emphasizes it. His choices are consistently not showy, beyond the emphasis of the courses and in general directing to some nifty, and underrated, production design. He leans on the script in the right way but doesn't let the script do all the talking. It's concise and precise working matching the nature of the screenplay, and frankly work that deserves more praise through its restraint, which is sometimes the right choice.

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

Largely makes points I don't disagree with, except regarding the cast.

Tahmeed:

I certainly could've seen it.

8000's:

I think Vincennes busted Mitchum in-universe so it would've been fitting. I think Mitchum could've excelled with either but would be an ideal Bud. Though if say one had the ideal Lancaster/Douglas/Mitchum trio we never got, I'd go Ed/Bud/Jack.

Houndtang:

I don't think so only because it seemed like the lineups were random anyways, Globes actually only had Meredith from the eventual final five (though they had Burns in lead) but given Dourif later won the BAFTA, I think he was the focus from the supporting cast.

Robert MacFarlane said...

According to Aimee Carrero, Mylod encouraged the cast to have one "free" take after they got the scripted ones down, which is how stuff like Fiennes's reading of "Taco Tuesday" and Taylor-Joy's "thank you" as Slowik walks away from the table with a pissed expression made it into the film.

Matt Mustin said...

Robert: Keeping that "Taco Tuesday" take in was an amazing choice.

Anonymous said...

Louis what would be your VFX nominees?

Anonymous said...

And your makeup & hairstyling?

Louis Morgan said...

Robert:

Quite the clever way to include improv, as just watching the film you'd never guess it, but only made the film better.

Anonymous:

VFX Nominees:

Avatar: The Way of Water
The Batman
Nope
Three Thousand Years of Longing
Top Gun: Maverick

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Makeup & Hairstyling Nominees:

All Quiet on the Western Front
Babylon
The Batman
Crimes of the Future
The Northman

BIG HM to EEAO and All Quiet.

Oliver Menard said...

Louis: Your cinematography and production design nominees.

Calvin Law said...

Chau's 'Tortillas deliciosas' is probably my favourite line delivery of the year. Glad to see her get bumped up to a 4.5.

Matt Mustin said...

Calvin: My favourite from her is probably "We gel! :)"

Calvin Law said...

With regards to cinematography I'd heartily recommend everyone check out EO and Athena if they're looking to fill out their lineup.

Calvin Law said...

Matt: Another incredible line delivery. And one of my favourite moments in the film is actually Judith Light's silent reaction towards Taylor-Joy in the end.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: Yeah, I doubt Payne would have allowed such breathing room. I talked to someone who worked on one of his sets, and they said he’s violently against any ad-libbing. And also that he was a bully and a dick.

Matt Mustin said...

Robert: Also, his movies suck.

Emi Grant said...

Louis: How well do you think Nicholas Braun would've faired in this role?

I kept thinking throughout the whole thing that there's aspects of Tyler that had, to put it kindly, "Cousin Greg energy" in a way.

Matt Mustin said...

Pretty much loved Bones and All. Thought Guadagnino managed to find the exact right tone of weirdly enough a quiet beauty, aided wonderfully by his leads, that makes the moments of horror and violence all the more shocking.

LOVED the score, of course.

Russell-5(Absolutely essential as she, along with Chalamet who she shares amazing chemistry with, grounds the film and keeps the humanity in it and ends up making a film about cannibals rather touching as strange as that sounds.)

Chalamet-5(OK, I've been a bit of a skeptic about his perceived greatness, somewhat to the point of stubbornness in that I didn't even fully buy him in Dune that much, but he completely turned me around with this quiet, compelling, grounded and altogether beautiful work, and of course again he has amazing chemistry with Russell. So good job on shutting me down dude, you showed me.)


Holland-3(Not a lot to do but he makes his impact.)

Rylance-4.5(OK, let me just start by saying this is one of the most "love it or hate it" performances I've seen in quite some time, so if you hate this, you're right, don't come at me. That said, I thought he was very effective in bringing just the right amount of creepy absurdism, which plays beautifully against what Russell and Chalamet are doing.)

Stuhlbarg-4(Only one scene but he is creepy as fuck. Also I guess he can just play pretty much anything?)

Green-3

Sevigny-3.5

Harper-3

Cobb-2.5

Horowitz-3



Oliver Menard said...

Rylance is a strong 4.5 for me and I doubt Louis will give him anything lower.

Michael McCarthy said...

Matt: Isn’t it funny how Chalamet’s portrayal of an addiction was so much more subdued and authentic here than it was in Beautiful Boy? That’s what hit me the hardest about this performance.

Marcus said...

Louis: If Quan wins it all, where would he rank amongst your favorite Oscar winners.

Also, your top ten performances in Martin McDonagh's films.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: How did your interest in analyzing acting start? Was there a specific performance that triggered your interest for you?

8000S said...

Louis: Speaking of Ed and Bud, how do you think Clift and Brando would fare in the parts?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

8000s: I think in the 50's, Clift and Brando would be a good pick for either role. Maybe John Garfield for Vincennes?

Louis Morgan said...

Robert:

Not surprising, and I mean if you're going to be a dick at least make better films.

Oliver:

Rather space them out a bit so ask again on the next post.

Emi Grant:

I think he would've done well, though would've kind of been more of a give away, since Hoult is naturally a bit suave so you expect more out of him from the outset to which Tyler consistently, and hilariously disappoints. I would agree there is a lot of Cousin Greg energy, particularly in the final cooking sequence.

Marcus:

I'd rather get into rankings like that more so in the lead results.

Tony:

Honestly can't remember what was the exact impetus, other than kind of trying to explain my choices for the best of the year.

8000's:

Early 50's Clift would've been an amazing Ed and Brando Bud (think you need the greater physicality that Brando has for Bud).

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Do you remember what caused your interest in film in general? What attracted you to this medium?

Also, what are your thoughts on Peter Deming as a cinematographer, and his work on The Menu?