Sunday 12 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Felix Kammerer in All Quiet on the Western Front

Felix Kammerer did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Paul Bäumer in All Quiet on the Western Front. 

All Quiet on the Western Front while not quite the masterpiece of the original adaptation, is still an excellent remake that finds effective variation within the same story.

The greatest similarity between the two versions is that our focal point entrance to experiencing the great war is a group of four school boys who sign up for the war. A relatively minor change happens early on as Paul in the original film, as performed by Lew Ayres, has a slightly more doubting reaction when watching the speech by their schoolteacher setting himself up differently as not fully into the idea of the war even as he goes along with peer pressure. This is downplayed substantially as we do see Paul pushed along by his classmates again, however, Kammerer's portrayal of this is more so a "sure why not" than granting any reservations to it. He does present a certain kind of naïve shrug to the whole thing about just going along with his more adamant friends, however less with doubt and more just with an "I guess I'm doing this now" attitude. This isn't a criticism of Kammerer's performance however and instead grants Paul really as this starting point within the film as just a naïve young man going along with his friends for "an adventure". When he is going along the process of joining and gets a coat from a now-dead soldier, Paul's question about it is again performed by Kammerer as just a good schoolboy in a sense of just wanting to make sure he isn't getting something owed to something else, rather than doubting what is in front of him. 

Kammerer's work from this point on becomes the focal point in which to see the reality of their situation as they proceed into the war and face the very harsh realities of its existence. Kammerer's performance just watching as they see medics needing the truck for wounded men captures the dawning realizations naturally as just the minor hint of concern as they begin on their journey. What Kammerer also brings through shortly afterward is this naturally empathetic quality in Paul as the men are instructed to wear gas masks, and Paul helps another soldier help, getting himself into trouble for not getting the mask on fast enough. Kammerer's reaction brings a natural humanity in the moment of helping him out and brings just a natural ease in the part that makes it very easy to invest in Paul within the situation, as a good man, albeit definitely not a hero. On the first night of the actual war we see kind of the nature of playing the game at war, and though they are starting to see the truth of it, Kammerer's reactions again bring so naturally the dawning reality however as something that isn't fully there, yet. As we see Paul take on watch duty at night, taking a potshot at the enemy lines, which Kammerer portrays with a boyish eagerness, really just a boy at play. As natural though is his immediate reaction of fear and disbelief when his helmet gets shot off, and Paul runs into a bit more reality on his first night. 

What follows I think is really a grouping of different moments that one can connect to Kammerer's work that all speak to the strength of this performance. that is his ability to very much make the battle scenes that much more visceral and intense by always presenting our essential facet to every minute of these scenes. Kammerer's work delivers this focal point, not as a shallow surrogate for the audience, but rather as a very powerful reflection of just what one normal man would look like facing the reality of war after having been bluntly ignorant of it. Kammerer's work is consistently incredible in every war sequence, as he's never in any sequence in such a simple way. Take even that opening night which quickly gets worse to the point where one of their friends dies so quickly after entering the war. Kammerer is able to express the immediacy of the fear of the situation that initially envelops him, while also showing in just a moment the heartbreak in just seeing his friend die. Kammerer captures the immediacy of the horror both in just a sense of personal fear and also in terms of seeing his friend die around him. This is a consistent factor throughout every action scene throughout the film, each that is that much more visceral and emotional because of how pointed Kammerer's work is. Every reaction speaks so much to the horror of it all, whether making one feel the horror of seeing friends die by flame thrower or just the gut "ah shit" reaction of seeing tanks headed his way. It is stellar work in terms of selling every sequence that much more via performance. 

Kammerer's work though is beautifully balanced in the scenes where we are not directly on the battlefield and are just among the other men trying to live in moments of relative peace. Kammerer's great as this quieter man in Paul yet never uses that to be dull within a scene. He develops a great sense of camaraderie with all the other students he had gone in and there is just a sense of that connection in his work that is wonderful. Take even the moment of listening to one of his friend's sexual success with a French local, Kammerer's reactions are again pitch perfect in creating the sense of appreciation for his friend, and even a wistful wish within his own lack of experience in that regard. Kammerer in all of these interactions grants the sense of men truly being comfortable with one another and getting what joy they can out of life. The most potent aspect of this relationship though is his interactions with the more experienced soldier Kat (Albrecht Schuch). Their chemistry together is absolutely amazing because we have such genuine progress between the two as Kat begins as this "fun uncle" as he shows Paul the ropes. Kammerer's manner towards Schuch is so striking though in the way Kammerer shows this sense of warmth towards the man, an admiration but also a sense of connection. Take the scene where Paul reads a letter from Kat's wife to Kat, although it is hard to take your eyes off Schuch in the scene, Kammerer is also great in the way he delivers the words in moments you see Paul also taking it in, such as Kat's son had died. Kammerer grants such a potent sense of empathy in his performance. The two together though are so good because no moment is singular. They are convincing in the moment of sharing their mutual heartbreak over their plight, but they are just as convincing in the moment of just this real love the men share, as they share their plight together. There is a sense of fun in the two together, in their misadventures of stealing from a farmer, and the two are absolutely convincing in crafting this relationship in a way that feels so tangible and so very poignant within all the horror. 

Although Paul is very much our entry point to the various aspects of experiencing the war, the overarching story of Paul is how he is changed throughout his experiences in the war. Kammerer brilliantly brings this to life in really every subsequent scene from the earliest moment of letting his friends pull him where he very much just has that naïve fresh-faced eagerness, to the first battle where the horror of it plunges that right out of him. In every successive scene, we see the contrast in Kammerer's performance where his face loses any sense of immediate naivety but also seemingly any hope in life. His delivery begins with that eagerness that quickly matures, not to a normal adult, but that of an innate exasperation of someone who has already seen too much in this life. Kammerer naturally embodies this state of immediate and intense maturation, as his face alone just wears differently in his performance from the fresh-faced boy to the grizzled soldier. There isn't any makeup or obvious choice in this, it is just Kammerer's performance that conveys this age. Although this is a process we see in his work throughout there is a fundamental change in two moments in particular. The first is one of the essential scenes of the original film and novel, where Paul stabs a French soldier alone in the trenches, a scene that differs in being almost silent in its execution. Kammerer is outstanding throughout the sequence as we see initially just the intensity of survival as he jumps and stabs the man. Kammerer's work is heartbreaking though as that intensity painfully loses itself to this moment of realization we see on his brow and he suddenly sees the enemy soldier for what he is, a fellow man. Kammerer's sudden rush of feeling and attempted hospitality of trying to give the man what medical help he can is devastating. Kammerer's making this shift from being the blunt instrument of war to the man realizing that he has murdered so painful and so tangible as every action feels so filled with regret with such a tremendous sense of pathos in his eyes. The other fundamental shift comes when Kat gets shot by a local farm boy for their thievery of food, which begins as the two barely seem to recognize the seriousness. Kammerer's reactions are again great as he slowly is filled with desperation as it becomes more apparent the need for medical help is for Kat, though he doesn't take it fully in until when he gets Kat to the hospital who has already died from blood poisoning. Kammerer's work again makes you feel every moment of their previously loving relationship in their anguish that he presents as something that goes to the bone, as it doesn't feel like the first time but rather the pain is of so many losses of this ilk. And the man we see after this point is now really just a husk, his eyes now fashioning the thousand-yard stare really lost within his trauma, and even in the pointless final battle we see a man just going through the motions of life because he honestly died in spirit with Kat. This is an amazing performance by Felix Kammerer that gives us the full journey of a soldier that isn't all about death, in fact there is so much life in his portrait however what we then see is the true tragedy of it via the slow removal of that through the machinery of war. 

44 comments:

Calvin Law said...

Fantastic performance, and this write-up is definitely encouraging me to up him to a 5. The stabbing scene is particularly impressive. I have a feeling he was in the top 10 in terms of getting votes.

Hope Ayres gets upgraded to a 5 too at some point.

Luke Higham said...

1. Abbott
2. Bajestani
3. Song
4. Rylance
5. Pattinson

Anonymous said...

Louis what would be your score top ten?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Outstanding work on every front that matches Ayres for me.

Oliver Menard said...

A masterful performance. He's got a firm spot in my top 5 of the year and he tops Ayres for me.

1. Park
2. Kammerer
3. Skarsgård
4. Fiennes
5. Chalamet

1. Abbott
2. Bajestani
3. Song
4. Rylance
5. Pattinson

Matt Mustin said...

Watched The Outfit. It's definitely not great (in fact the script is pretty silly if you think about it) but it's entirely solid, anchored by a fantastic lead performance.

Rylance-5
Deutch-2.5
Flynn-4
O'Brien-3.5
Beale-3
Amuka-Bird-3

moviefilm said...

1) Hae-il
2) Fiennes
3) Kammerer
4) Chalamet
5) Skarsgard

1) Bajestani
2) Kang-ho
3) Rylance
4) Abbott
5) Pattinson

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

1. Park
2. Fiennes
3. Skarsgård
4. Kammerer
5. Chalamet

1. Abott
2. Song
3. Bajestani
4. Rylance
5. Pattinson

Anonymous said...

Btw Louis, could you add these performances to the supporting ranking? If you don't mind of course.

Andy Serkis in The Batman
P.J. Byrne in Babylon
Ingvar Sigurdsson in The Northman
Don McKellar/Scott Speedman in Crimes of the Future

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Original Score:

My Nominees:

Babylon
The Banshees of Inisherin
The Batman
The Fabelmans
The Northman

Rest of the Top Ten:

6. Nope
7. Decision to Leave
8. The Woman King
9. Pinocchio
10. Broker

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: I think I also predicted the right order for the Best Actor Oscar 2022. My prediction is in the lineup post

How do you think George Clooney would have done as J.J. Sefton?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Rating and thoughts on Jon Hamm in Confess, Fletch.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on The Northman's Costume Design, Production Design and Makeup & Hairstyling. I want to get your thoughts on the technical aspects before Cast, Direction and Screenplay on Skarsgard's review.

Bryan L. said...

IASIP: The Gang Tries to Win a Championship

Marcus said...

Louis: Why do you think there are far fewer films/TV shows set in a college or university setting compared to high school?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Marcus: College is a less universal experience than high school, and it's associated with at least some degree of privilege by virtue of cost. It's a shame though, because shows like Community and Normal People really show what you can do in that setting (although I think the gang stopped attending classes after some point in Community, but I digress).

Anonymous said...

Louis: your top 10 Michelle Yeoh acting moments.

Anonymous said...

Luke, how would you rank this year's comic book films in terms of anticipation.

Luke Higham said...

1. The Flash (I'm not gonna lie, yesterday's trailer got me hooked)
2. Across The Spider-Verse
3. Guardians 3
4. Shazam 2
5. Ant-Man 3
6. The Marvels
7. Aquaman 2
8. Blue Beetle
9. Kraven The Hunter

Anonymous said...

Louis: Say your Top 10 Best Actress and Supporting Actress of 2022. Do the same thing what you are doing in the technical categories, say your 5 nominees and rank the rest (#6-10).

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If you are giving that ranking, Top 25 for Supporting and Top 40 for Lead with additional 4+ honourable mentions

Luke Higham said...

With lowest 5 and 4.5.

Matt Mustin said...

Anonymous: Could you ask that in a nicer tone?

Tony Kim said...

Louis - What are your thoughts on these alternate casting choices for The Fabelmans?

Mitzi:
Rachel McAdams
Kirsten Dunst
Greta Gerwig

Boris:
Alan Arkin
Albert Brooks
Fred Melamed

Burt:
Adam Driver
Jake Gyllenhaal
Jesse Eisenberg

Luke Higham said...

Personally I would rather you saved those rankings for the results since Tang Wei and IU need re-watches.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Tony: Melamed would've been an interesting choice, while I feel both Brooks and Arkin would have been better as the sarcastic grandpas rather than the inspirational, energetic ones. Eisenberg and Gyllenhaal on the other hand could have been a bit too intense for a naturally kind character like Burt, physically and acting-wise (Dano was perfectly cast in that regard).

Matt Mustin said...

Ytrewq: Sight unseen you could say the exact same thing about Dano in that role. This is the guy who was in There Will Be Blood, Prisoners and played The Riddler.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Tony: Eisenberg is great within his niche of insecure, neurotic men, but a role like Burt Fabelman just needs an innate warmth I haven't seen from him yet. Dano did display that he could do that earlier with Okja.

Driver could have been interesting, at the very least as a counterpoint to his work in Marriage Story.

Matt Mustin said...

Brooks I think could've done something really special actually.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: If you've read David Foster Wallace's 'Good People', do you think it could work as a feature film? If so, who would you cast in the central roles?

Shaggy Rogers said...

For those who saw The Fabelmans, did it change your negative opinion about The Greatest Show on Earth? Did it get worse, better or nothing changed?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Tony: I would have loved to see McAdams. I imagine her take would be more psychological and perhaps a bit more generous. Dunst might have worked. As much as I loved Gerwig in 20th Century Women, she would be SUPER anachronistic for 1950’s/60’s.

Arkin would have been too easy and obvious. Melamed is too young. Brooks might have been interesting.

Eisenberg would probably have come off as too clinical (also, like Gerwig, anachronistic in style). I no longer trust Gyllenhaal to play a role like Burt without adding something unnecessary or distracting. Driver could have worked, he’s malleable.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Come to think of it, Mel Brooks as Boris would've been a cool choice, I'm sure he still has the vigor required for the part despite the age.

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

You are correct.

Uh, I think it is a role that plays theoretically to his strengths, however, I don't think he'd allude to the darkness of the character as well, as part of what makes Holden so great are you can believe he might be the mole before the truth is revealed.

Luke:

Hamm - 3.5(Hamm is an interesting performer in that he has very much the traditional leading man looks, he has acting chops both with comedy and drama, however, he just doesn't quite work as a leading man which is kind of strange, but I guess it's that certain "je ne sais quoi" when it comes to stardom. This is generally a good performance, he hits his general charm and sardonic marks effectively enough. Has enough comic timing and everything, yet there still is something missing from it all.)

Luke:

Amazing costume work, and it is pretty laughable that it was consistently ignored in every tech category, I mean even if you don't like the film I find it hard to deny that every aspect is pretty meticulous in terms of transporting you to this era. The costumes speak immediately to the period but also as quickly to the character in terms of creating the different royal garb, to barbarian, and each individual of their nature like Kidman's more flowing dresses. Combine that with not only is it accurate to the period, but it is also striking as such in the way it is so well designed. Combine that one more time with some fantastic fantastical costumes like the magnificent valkyrie outfit and Bjork's entire costume. Every bit of it is striking and it is altogether amazing work.

Craig Lathrop's production design is once again stellar, in once again crafting something so unique yet wholly transportive in that quality. Mixing blunt reality with this certain specific style in reflecting the brutality. It is the extraordinary mix though in sort of the basic fitting period with the grand edges of the more wealthy elements reflected in the initial "court" or just some of the ornate qualities of Kidman's room. Multiple villages though each distinct in their own ways such as the grass-covered huts contrasting the village of the attack. But again combine that with some more slightly fantastical elements such as the volcano, Dafoe's "tunnel" or the tomb, it is tremendous work once again.

Louis Morgan said...

As for the makeup and hairstyling, Valkyrie braces, what more do you need? Really though here's a case where the hairstyling itself does need its own praise because of how eye-catching all of it is on its own, and again how much it manages to say just in itself. With though brilliant more extravagant makeup work. Mixing dirt, grime, and viscera, but also creation like Bjork's look, and the skeleton warrior. Amazing work across the board.

Marcus:

Tahmeed summed it up nicely.

Anonymous:

1. Seeing the worth in Waymond - EEAO
2. Talking Joy that life is worthwhile - EEAO
3. Experiencing other worlds for the first time - EEAO
4. Goodbye/love - Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon
5. Refusing Alpha Gong Gong's order - EEAO
6. Reacting to Jobu's entrance - EEAO
7. Divorce - EEAO
8. Calm conversation with Diedre - EEAO
9. Refusing to come home to see her dying husband - The Lady
10. Every weapon fight - Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon

Anonymous:

The female acting categories will wait for the results as per usual.

Tony:

McAdams, I think definitely could've worked and would've been similar but more tempered I think. Dunst I think could've gone either way. I think Gerwig could've been atrocious and as noted by Robert extremely out of place in the period.

I've already seen Arkin's performance in my head. Brooks could've been something interesting. Not sure what but might've been something special. Melamed is indeed too young.

Driver I think could've been great as well and seems a role he'd do well with. Don't trust Gyllenhaal with it at all. Eisenberg is too innately cold, and I don't think would've brought the right "dad' energy.

Tahmeed:

I have. I think the internal monologue is essential there so it would be tough though not impossible. However I feel like you'd need to expand not based on that story, but maybe include other "good people" consideration situations based on their specific moralities along with that one based around goodness as attached to Christian morality. To make it a tapestry of "good people" dealing with decisions based on their own moralities.

Anyway.

Lane: Xolo Maridueña
Sheri: Sadie Sink (though she does need success outside of Stranger Things after The Whale)

Shaggy:

No change. Just admiration for Spielberg's ability to use even a bad film well.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: That expansion of Good People definitely sounds interesting. Maybe throw in Anya Taylor-Joy and Nicholas Hoult as the couple from 'Hills like White Elephants' as contrast?

Bryan L. said...

Louis: It’s funny that you mention that about Jon Hamm, since I’ve been pondering lately as to why he hasn’t hit stardom in films, despite having the looks and charm for it. Do you think he might be better suited for roles like his turn in Baby Driver? (For example.)

Tony Kim said...

Wasn't expecting such a flurry of responses to my Fabelmans post. Really enjoyed reading all of your responses.

Ytrewq: God I wish I'd thought of Mel Brooks earlier. Honestly, a part of me thinks that if he had been cast, not only he would've hit more precursors than Hirsch, he could be closer to winning than you might think.

Robert: Melamed is a *hair* too young, not egregiously so, I think.

I don't fully agree with those who think Eisenberg and Gerwig would have been too anachronistic, I can certainly see them being successfully directed to fit more in with the period. Admittedly Gerwig would've been bad had she been directed to play it as theatrically as Williams, but in a more naturalistic register she could've been fine.

Generally agree with the replies to my Burt suggestions. All those guys I mentioned would've had darker takes on the characters that would've been... not necessarily "better", but undoubtedly interesting, a quality I was more focused on while making all these choices. While I liked Dano's performance, one problem I had with him was that he didn't quite project paternal authority (which worked in some scenes, but didn't in others), and I was trying to think of actors who could be more commanding in that respect. Regarding Gyllenhaal, I haven't seen the film Widlife, but I think I considered him based on what I heard about his role in it - strangely enough, considering who directed that one.

Overall, McAdams and Driver are probably my favourites from the group. I'd be interested in hearing if anyone else has alternate suggestions for Burt and Mitzi.

Anonymous said...

What scene did Dano need to project "Paternal authority" that you felt was lacking? Burt wasn't supposed to be a domineering dad.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

I could see that as a direct contrast.

Bryan:

Yes. He's much better suited as a character actor type despite his appearance.

Tony Kim said...

Anon: No, I get that he's not supposed to be domineering, but even still Dano at times looked and sounded too boyish to be fully plausible as a teenager's father. I'm thinking of the scene where he argues with Sammy and yells "You got something you want to say to me?"

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Tony: I don't understand that criticism, Dano projects plenty of authority in scenes where Burt is forced to be more forceful, like when he tells Sammy to focus on editing camping trip film. He's a loving dad first, so I think Dano makes the right choice to make moments like that not seem like Burt's way.

Tony Kim said...

Tahmeed: Well I thought Dano was good in that scene, but what stuck out to me there was more his conflicting emotions and concern for his family rather than forcefulness. But you make an interesting point.