Song Kang-ho did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning CANNES, for portraying Ha Sang-hyeon in Broker.
Broker is a good film about the "brokers" of an abandoned child, who go with that child's mother to find a buyer while being tracked by police. On re-watch, though I would say it isn't Kore-eda's best, getting bogged down a bit by the amount of plotting he includes particularly a strangely haphazard one involving a gangster wanting the child.
Having said that there is still plenty to appreciate about this film within Kore-eda's typical appeal about calm observation via slightly atypical circumstances. This time working with a South Korean cast, led by two well-known South Korean vets Bae Doona as the seemingly cold cop tracking the brokers, and Song Kang-ho as the lead broker. The very idea of the brokers at the core of the story seems a particularly corrupt idea, as Song's Ha along with Gang Dong-won's Dong-soo, who is also an orphan himself, collect babies abandoned at a local church and sell them on a black market. You don't instantly reject them, despite their actual job seeming a bit diabolical on the surface because of the performances of both men, though particularly Song who is his typically charming self. Song brings that innately joyful presence of his that does quickly disarm you from being too suspicious of the men, and you instantly suspect that they must have some better motivation despite how potentially horrid their chosen crime may be. Song just exudes a good man so you believe they must have a good reason and in every aspect of his performance in a way he is putting any viewer at ease because in every instance, even when destroying evidence of their crime, Song presents an affable manner seemingly of a man who isn't nefarious despite the nefarious deed he seems to be committing.
Matters get slightly more complicated quickly when the mother of the child comes back, Moon (Lee Ji-eun), joins the two men in their slightly rough van to try to sell the child. Early on we do get an explanation for this practice where Ha explains that they would rather the child not just be left an orphan and that they do search for a genuinely loving home. Song's performance is essential in this scene because you absolutely need to believe Ha at this moment. And with Song you absolutely do, who just delivers every word with just sincerity and a kind optimism that is emphasized in every word. His expression isn't of a man hiding something more, as strange as the practice is, and as much as they are making money from the practice, Song shows that Ha is performing a real duty to help the child out in his mind. And everything Song does in the performance shows the good nature of the character. His presence might as well be described as sunshine here with the great big smile that is most often adorning his face in every given moment. Song showing consistently a man who just wants to help the situation even while doing it in a way that most would deem questionable and is in fact illegal when it comes to practical description.
For much of the film, which is most often on this ragtag group, who are eventually joined by another young orphan just to add to this, and where Song is a great deal of just emphasizing the optimistic manner of his character. Song doesn't present him as foolish within this idea either, rather his manner with this is always as someone keenly empathetic towards those around him and keenly aware of the problems they may be facing. That is where Song does excel in creating a sense of true empathy in really the moments quite simply where Ha isn't smiling and in these moments Song does bring a real emotional depth in the sense of the character's willingness to try to understand others. I love particularly his pivotal scene with Moon where they talk about her choice to abandon her child, and while Ha asks the occasional pressing question which Song delivers with the most genuine sense of concern, his eyes at the same time show this respectful restraint within the character. It is wonderful to work in portraying this sense of the man's real honest goodness even within his profession as the reinforcing trait in Song's performance consistently throughout the film is his care and concern for others. It is simply a given and that is what it should be.
Now Ha, despite ostensibly being one of the leads of the film probably has the least given to him in terms of backstory for the four main leads of the film. The one scene that differs from this is when we see Song visit his own daughter, where he clearly some deadbeat dad to some extent as he is promising money for his estranged wife and trying to connect with his daughter. Although I think the scene itself is implemented a little imperfectly just it feels placed in the narrative in an overly disconnected way, Song is great in the scene. As this is a scene where Song doesn't show cheerfulness as the basic emotion in the man. Rather he is filled with a certain insecurity and where in every other moment you see his lack of hesitation to emotionally reach out there's a real power to the restraint in the power of his work at the moment by showing Ha nearly lost for words and holding back his emotions. In turn, what Song shows is Ha dealing with his real pain at the moment where in particular when his daughter quotes a dismissive remark about him, Song is heartbreaking at the moment when he thinks that is coming from his own daughter as you see in his subtle reaction just how much pain is in this.
Speaking of disconnected scenes though, there are none more disconnected than the gangster also seeking the child, which frankly should've just been removed from the film since they feel so rushed. Sadly Song is the one involved in these scenes. This is particularly in the final scenes with the gangster where two extremely rushed and very brief scenes need to show the typically happy-go-lucky man not only not happy but going straight to murdering the gangster. An idea that I think could've worked if it was built in a more substantial way, but the whole process feels rushed and haphazard. Song is good to his credit, though the odds are stacked against him because he legitimately doesn't have enough time to really convey that determination to take such a rash act. It isn't entirely convincing, not due to Song, I think he does what he can but the writing sabotages the attempt. The same is true for his extremely brief final scene, where Song's silent expression does reveal the weight of the crime, but it is so brief, it limits the power of seeing Ha fall to this point. Again Song does what he can but I do think Kore-eda does a disservice to his performance in both scenes. And I hate in part having to leave this review as such because I don't want to be misunderstood this is a wonderful performance still. He's so great in every little naturalistic moment we get with him and the group. I have to say although the limits of the film, keep this from being one of Song's best performances, and in the scheme of the film, I will say the two female leads left the greatest impression, which was true on my initial watch but only became more abundantly clear on re-watch.
76 comments:
Yeah, his performance and the film faded a bit on rewatch for me as well, though I was hoping that wouldn't happen for you. Glad to see that Bae and Lee seem to have had staying power for you.
Louis: do you think Broker would've gotten in had it been South Korea's submission?
Calvin:
No, because I don't think the passion was quite there for it, and I think it would've suffered more from not being Decision to Leave than Decision to Leave suffered from not being Broker. And it is important to remember that the academy now has returned to their pre-Parasite attitude for South Korea, ignoring its last three submissions, despite this year's being one of the most acclaimed films of the year certainly one of the most accalimed non-English language films. Parasite might just be the extreme outlier, rather than the break in the trend.
That's a sobering thought now that you put it that way. I guess makes it all the more astonishing what happened with Parasite (in both a good way for it, but in a bad way for South Korean films in general).
What's everyone's final BAFTA predictions?
Louis what is your cinematography top ten?
Louis: Your ranking of the Kore-eda films you've seen so far.
Anonymous:
Cinematography:
My Nominees:
Bardo
Blonde
Decision to Leave
The Fabelmans
The Northman
Rest of the Top Ten:
6. Pearl
7. Nope
8. Babylon
9. Top Gun: Maverick
10. EO
Oliver:
1. Like Father, Like Son
2. Still Walking
3. Shoplifters
4. After the Storm
5. Broker
Really lovely performance. I'll agree the film struggles with all its subplots it throws in there but I felt the general direction Kore-eda pushes things in keeps it consistently moving regardless. Helps that Song and the rest (especially IU) sell it so well.
Not his best work, don't know why the film seemed to throw a moment at him that would have made sense for the poor father in Parasite but just doesn't here. That being said, it's still wonderful work for the rest of it, I guess I was just willfully ignoring some of the film's limits on my first watch.
Louis: Your extended thoughts on Lee Ji-eun's performance, and thoughts on Im Seung-soo's performance?
I think I was a bit less distracted by the gangster scenes than y’all, but I absolutely agree that Bae Doo-na and *especially* Lee Ji-eun were the standouts.
Also I know I’m a post late but I’m THRILLED my favorite male performance of the year got a five, I’d be absolutely tickled if he sneaks into the top 5.
All Quiet won the BAFTA for Adapted Screenplay.
Codnon wins BAFTA, she needed that.
Keoghan won. What.
Hopefully that puts Condon on a Rylance/Hopkins type route to an Oscar win.
Ecstatic about Condon winning, hoping it translates to SAG and the Oscar.
As for Keoghan, I don't think he's winning SAG over Quan.
Elvis wins Casting. How?
EEAAO wins Editing.
All Quiet wins Cinematography.
Banshees takes Screenplay.
Navalny takes Documentary.
All Quiet takes Score.
All Quiet wins Sound.
Top Gun went 0 for 4.
Elvis took Costumes.
Banshees takes Best British Film.
Babylon takes Production Design
Berger took Director.
Elvis wins Makeup.
Emma Mackey won the Rising Star Award.
Austin Butler won.
Blanchett won.
All Quiet won Best Film.
Well, Farrell is not winning.
I know, and it hurts.
Shame about Farrell but happy for Condon and McDonagh otherwise considering Banshees. Pretty iffy about that Documentary win though (think Navalny is fine albeit important but Fire of Love and Moonage Daydream were easily much better IMO). Obviously a great showing for All Quiet although I doubt this leads to a BP Oscar win, but at the very least it's looking at several wins. Also think this sets up Butler and Blanchett for Oscar wins, both of whom I'm guessing will also take SAG.
Seeing as how the oscar ceremony isn't until March 12th, and I'm notoriously bad at guessing their wins early on...I'll save my honest predictions until we're closer to the date.
Mitchell: One thing that has struck me is how many Canadian politicians have great speaking voices. William Lyon MacKenzie King, Louis St. Laurent, John Diefenbaker, Lester B. Pearson, Pierre Trudeau, Tommy Douglas, Robert Stanfield, Brian Mulroney, Joe Clark, John Turner, Jack Layton, Jean Chretién, Ed Broadbent... I could honestly listen to any of those guys reading the phone book.
Also, it's not fully current news, but I saw the trailer for "The Flash" today and...I have some concerns.
I was halfway through the trailer when I said "oh...this is Flashpoint mixed with No Way Home". I'll admit that may be a gross and unfair simplification, but at the same time, I can't be the only person seeing the similarities. And with the recent news with Ezra Miller...well, it's difficult for me to truly get excited about his upcoming work. It's cool to see Michael Keaton in the suit - no question there - but I seriously doubt we'll see him in any action scenes without CGI doubling.
Yah...hard to get excited for this one, frankly, which sucks because I'm a DC guy; I own "The Flashpoint Paradox" on DVD, for god sakes.
8000s: Sorry for not responding to your comment earlier, but I did see it and I do agree.
Honestly, it's strange for me to hear someone give such praise about Canadian voices/accents in general. Maybe it's because I've grown up with it all my life (great lakes region, specifically), but I never really thought of our accent as particularly unique or cool sounding - from a linguistic perspective, anyways. It might have something to do with some of the guys you mentioned not being "modern Canadians" (IE Mackenzie being from 19th century England), or from other parts of Canada besides Ontario.
All Quiet winning big is great, but I'm not convinced it's in the best Best Picture race. If Berger were nominated for Director I might feel differently. It's got a shot at Adapted Screenplay, Cinematography, Score and tech awards no doubt. Farrell has to be the Benedict Cumberbatch of the lead actor race this year. A performance you really want to see win over the obvious safe bet, but I don't think it's happening.
Regarding BAFTA:
Quality wise:
Estatic to see Condon win. Although I prefer Quan, I don't mind at all some other recognition being handed out in the form of Keoghan. All Quiet (film, screenplay), Berger, Banshees for Screenplay, Blanchett all strong choices. Less enthusiastic about Butler, but at least he's not bad though there are better choices. Most choices were at the very least decent, except Elvis in makeup & Hairstylign which sadly is probably going to repeat with Oscar.
Prediction Wise:
Picture: That's an interesting wrinkle. I'd say its wide open in many directions will be very interesting to see where PGA goes.
Director: Berger winning helps the Daniels more than anything, who I'd say are winning now.
Actor: Sadly, which I think we all knew in our hearts, that's probably it for Farrell and Butler will get the biopic bump and the overly easy win.
Actress: Yeoh needs SAG to conted at this point.
Supporting Actor: 100% think Quan still wins, but it does firm up Keoghan as the #2.
Supporting Actress: So glad there's a chance for Condon now, a bigger chance since Farrell lost. As it will be weird if Banshees doesn't get an acting prize so I think her stock just rose a great deal. Still will be close, but this was essential.
Oliver:
To be fair the director's branch will do what it does, I imagine Berger would've gotten in if it had been the full body voting on that category.
Mitchell: I mean, many Canadians that aren't from Ontario DO have great speaking voices, like Stanfield who was born in Nova Scotia, Clark who was born in Alberta, Duff Roblin (considered by many to be the greatest Premier of Manitoba, and was born there) or Chrétien from Quebec. Hell, most of the voice actors that work in Vancouver have great speaking voices as well.
Speaking of Quebec, I have to say that I do find Genevieve Bujold to have the loveliest Quebecois accent.
Louis: What are your thoughts on the trailer of The Flash?
RIP Richard Belzer
Tahmeed:
Lee - (Well to add to my earlier comments, her performance I think kind of suggests that the film might've been even more just from her perspective entirely since she so much becomes the most important figure whenever she is onscreen. Her performance is one that actually matches Bae's performance in a certain sense in that she presents you initially with one thing, and slowly reveals so much more than that. As she opens as like Bae she seems rather cold if not quite distant as the mother, and even as she decides to go with the men she's still fairly cold. Lee's fantastic though because in these moments there is nuance to suggest more than we will discover even at this moment, there is so much more going on in that reserved quality that we slowly uncover. She's great at revealing herself quietly in moments of more life that you see someone who has kind of pigeonholed herself into being emotionally closed off from everything, and what we see is her slowly letting herself feel anything at all. In the feeling though she is heartbreaking in revealing the guilt of her early abandonment but also her attempts at reaching any kind of tenderness. I think there could've been a lot of ways to overplay this role, but consistently her work brings such honesty to every little turn that you believe this transformation. Unlike with what happens to Song's character, her later moments of change feel absolutely earned as we are granted every step of this transformation within her work. She earns the reveal of the murder, but also the sense of emotional exhaustion tied with her "past" that she brings such a genuine depth to. This while wholly earning the little moments of revealing more openly that tenderness. It is amazing work.)
Im - (The character who also makes it is not quite an ensemble as he has less perspective than the rest of the characters. As per usual there is such a great naturalism that Kore-eda is able to bring out of his child actors and he feels just as natural to the scenes as his adult counterparts. Bringing the rest sense of fun in the adventure and a kind of hopefulness in what a child can be. Although I'll say I do think there is a missed opportunity, in that I don't think Kore-eda does *quite* enough with him particularly towards the end.)
8000's:
Looks like it will be either a complete mess or entertaining.
Louis: Was Song a 5 before you rewatched the film?
As the biggest Yeoh fanatic on here, I will have to quietly concede that she may well become the Micheal Keaton to EEAAO (Farrell also fits this box if Banshees is the BP winner).
Marcus:
No, he was probably a *stronger* 4.5, as still I thought the ending of his character seemed a little rushed but in my head I kind of pushed past it, more so than I was able to do this time around.
Calvin: I still think there's a good chance she could win at SAG, I think Blanchett was especially favored to win BAFTA regardless.
Louis: Your overall ranking of the Oscar-nominated films for this year.
Louis: Your thoughts on this scene https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OBUFGcWMsxA
Yeah, 4.5 seems about right thinking on it more.
Also caught up with Wakanda Forever, which I largely enjoyed despite the many very clear flaws. I think I just love Wakanda, is the thing.
Wright-4.5
Guirira-4
Nyong'o-3.5
Duke-3(I think they combined his character with Kaluuya's because the writing is all over the place with him)
Huerta-3
Coel-3
Thorne-3(I liked her presence enough even though her character was just kinda shoved in there)
Freeman-2.5(Not exactly "bad" but should've been cut)
Louis-Dreyfus-2(This is just NOT working)
Jordan-3.5
Bassett-4(The nomination, let alone her apparent front-runner status, is baffling, but she's definitely good.)
Louis: Considering we've already got Gary Oldman winning an Oscar for portraying Churchill, do you think that some point someone is going to win an Oscar for portraying FDR?
And if you don't mind, thoughts on FDR's voice.
8000S: This seems much more possible in a scenario of someone portraying Theodore Roosevelt actually, since people tend to speak highly of him each time he's mentioned, while FDR's reputation has suffered due to the Japanese interntment camps controversy. Plus Teddy and Churchill just had that larger than life, tough leader vibe to them that was much more defined than that of FDR and we all know how much Academy loves these type of characters.
Ytrewq: I'm sure FDR is still widely regarded, internment camps and all.
Louis: Thoughts on The Northman's editing.
Can't wait for Skarsgård's review next.
8000s: In all fairness, there's probably something negative you could find/discuss with Theodore - perhaps with his secret support of the Japanese during the Russo-Japanese war, or his intimidation of Columbia with the building of the Panama Canal. Nonetheless, with a modern view in mind, his legacy aged rather well. He was famously for big business and conservationism, and seemingly progressive in his views given the story about Minnie Cox, and the apparent diversity of the Rough Riders.
Now with Churchill and FDR, there's comparitively more to unpack with their legacies of course. I think many people are sympathetic to FDR because he was very sick, very tired, yet still kept his country above water in a bad stretch (The Depression and WW2). Churchill is the same way where he was absolutely the right person in the right spot to keep British moral alive in WW2. His actions in India, though, are...a bit more deplorable.
Oh, and as for FDR's voice - famously distinctive in his style and non-rhotic pronouncations, and perhaps reflective of his patrician background. It's one of those voices that an actor would need to get 100% right, sort of like JFK.
Mitchell: I'm sure you meant he was anti-big business, though not to the extent of Robert La Follette, another progressive Republican who was to his left.
Honestly, I'd recommend anyone to extensively read about the Progressive Era, an era where there were progressives in both the Democratic and Republican parties, like Teddy, La Follette, Hiram Johnson, George Norris, William Borah and Edwin Morrow in the GOP and Wilson and William Jennings Bryan in the Dems.
Mitchell: Also, one fun fact about FDR is that he wanted to form a party of both liberal Democrats and liberal Republicans with Wendell Willkie, the GOP candidate in 1940. Sadly, that never came to fruition.
Mitchell: Regarding legacies, it seems like Grant, Truman and Eisenhower nowadays are more respected for their presidency than they were when they were alive.
8000s: I'd agree in regards to Truman and Eisenhower. Truman's administration is certainly clouded by Hiroshima/Nagasaki, which were terrible losses of human life regardless of Japanese aggression or the risk of continuing the war. In his own time, though, Truman recieved more flack for his firing of Douglas McArthur during Korea, which likely cost him the race against Eisenhower. In retrospect, this was the right call since McArthur was insane and wanted to escalate the conflict by invading China.
As for old "Ike"...I'd argue his legacy as a General overshadows his achievements as President. He really was a forceful presence in the USA's side of WW2, and his leadership at D-Day honestly is the tail end of that service.
Also, I can submit a fun little fact about Eisenhower...
Apparently Ike was raised so patrician that if he swore infront of a woman, he would blush from embarassment.
Mitchell: I guess I really respect Truman and Eisenhower for having the balls to desegregate the armed forces and the schools, respectively. And Ike knew that repealing the New Deal was suicidal, so he governed the US as a pragmatic centrist.
Luke: I'm still holding out hope for a review of Charan and Rao in RRR before the alternates end, but I don't think it's very likely.
Louis: What do you think are the best examples of the "hero's journey" in film?
Tahmeed: He could still review them after the Alternates are finished, I think, if he finds a copy. The Death of Stalin ensemble review was posted just days before that years’ Oscars, so it’s happened before.
Tahmeed: Same as Bryan. If he doesn't then might have to wait a minimum of 4 years for that write-up. You'll probably want the 2020 bonus round (Very little left for him to watch) to come as soon as possible.
Screw the wait, tell us who Louis's 2022 winners will be and what we'll see in his video.
Picture: The Banshees of Inisherin
Director: Steven Spielberg - The Fabelmans
Actor: Colin Farrell - The Banshees of Inisherin
Actress: Cate Blanchett - TÁR
Supporting Actor: Ke Huy Quan - Everything Everywhere All At Once
Supporting Actress: Kerry Condon - The Banshees of Inisherin
Ensemble: The Banshees of Inisherin
Production Design: Babylon
Sound Editing: All Quiet on the Western Front
Sound Mixing: Top Gun Maverick
Score: The Fabelmans
Editing: The Fabelmans
Visual Effects: The Batman
Costume Design: The Northman
Cinematography: Decision to Leave
Makeup and Hairstyling: The Northman
Original Screenplay: The Banshees of Inisherin
Adapted Screenplay: All Quiet on the Western Front
Song: "Naatu Naatu" - RRR
Come on guys, say your predictions.
Have no fear and nobody here is betting money.
Those look on point because I think he's already listed his picks for most categories when the nominations came out.
Don't have much to say about the BAFTAs, still not a fan of their tastes for the past few years but you can't say they didn't give us some interesting wins.
Anonymous: The BAFTA Best Casting category is odd. Joker won a few years ago. I wonder if most of the voters are lazy and simply think "casting = lead performance".
Calvin: On Decision to Leave, I wonder if MUBI being unable to do a bigger campaign, and the major critic's organizations not awarding it contributed to the snub.
Louis: On Jessie Buckley, disagree on her not having the right presence/appearance for Joplin, but appreciated hearing your responses. What do you think of her as Clementine in Eternal Sunshine and Viola in Shakespeare in Love?
Bryan:
Ask again in the results.
Anonymous:
A great basically purely dramatic scene, where in way there's a testament to Root's range as a performer because one moment his Fuches is so silly yet is as convincing in this scene in where you see the determination and the power of his manipulation.
8000's:
Yes if anyone cracks the code, as so far the most prominent haven't been just "not good" they've been nearly terrible.
I mean overly particular like Katherine Hepburn that in itself presents a challenge, though not impossible to accomplish.
Luke:
In a way old school epic style editing though with some key moments where there is a bit more stylistic insanity thrown in. I think the film finds a happy medium between the two to craft a narrative that takes the moment for one just to absorb the grandeur and spectacle of it, with enough of a tautness within it to still have that more modern revenge style actioneer (even if that isn't really the purpose of the film).
Tony:
I could see her in both roles. Clementine I'd honestly say is a role which is well written, but in many ways is what the actress would bring to it with the specifics. Viola she'd probably knock out and I'd say bring a bit more innate verve to it.
Post a Comment