Tuesday 21 February 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Alexander Skarsgård in The Northman

Alexander Skarsgård did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Amleth in The Northman.

The Northman tells the tale of Amleth, the inspiration for Hamlet, about a Viking prince who must avenge the death of his father at the hands of his uncle. 

Alexander Skarsgård takes on the role that eventually would inspire Hamlet, though, in this version of the story, it is fair to say Skarsgård's Amleth has more in common with Maximus Decimus Meridius than most depictions of the Danish prince. I will bluntly say Skarsgård hasn't been a favorite actor of mine going into this film, not that I hated him as a performer, but more often than not I felt it was just "there" as a performer. As Amleth, under the guidance of Robert Eggers's visionary direction, this appears to be the role that was meant for Skarsgård. Partially this just is very strictly speaking physically needed for the role, that of a classical barbarian, as we are introduced to Amleth as an adult here on a wayward path as part of a Viking raiding party, Skarsgård being cut for the role quite literally. Skarsgård's physical work though is down to carb counting and protein intake, and while this is an essential facet of the character really, it isn't all there is to Skarsgård's performance. Skarsgård embodies the berzerker fully in every inch of himself as we see the sheer ferocity of his performance that does carry with this animalistic insanity as we see Amleth go about his "task" of slaughtering defenders of a village in the raid. Skarsgård becoming every inch of that force for violence that is incredibly striking all on its own. Skarsgård's presence here is absolutely tremendous in every sense, in creating this warrior of old, but also in this instance becoming a very specific screen presence that is essential for such a film. 

Often times acting in films of Northman's ilk can be less considered but in many ways, it is actually more essential than many films in terms of making the world convincing. The truth is this sort of material, even with Eggers's attention to detail and crafting such a vivid aesthetic, can fall apart instantly if the actors seem even slightly detached from the period. Northman avoids that by having a fully invested cast nearly across the board, however, Skarsgård is the focal point of it all, and thankfully for the film, he perhaps is the most invested in the material. Part of that is the aforementioned physicality but goes far beyond that. Skarsgård achieves the most essential element which is just simply being Amleth in the man who also transports us to this time. There isn't a line in his performance that never feels off despite being not only written to reflect the period but also with Amleth having to deal with really some of the most operatic notions within the piece. Skarsgård's performance doesn't wink, nor does it seem to force the style of the piece, he rather embodies and amplifies it so powerfully. Skarsgård speaks every line with an absolute conviction that speaks to the period as would a Shakespearean actor with any lines from the bard. With these lines that could be even more twisty potentially, Skarsgård makes them sing in their way, and behind them is this absolute ferocious truth within every word. Skarsgård's work does what is so remarkable it manages to embody the period as much as the aesthetic and embody the tone of the mythical legend in such a way that brings to life the grandeur of a piece but without losing any sense of essential humanity within it. 

Where there exists still the challenge yet is when Amleth is not speaking, which for the first half of the film is more often than not, Skarsgård must carry the film through silence. Skarsgård with that in mind does have a greater connection with any performer trying to lead a sword and sandal epic as the stoic lead, which is itself often handwaved but a specific challenge all its own. A challenge that Skarsgård charges head first into meeting it with every bit of determination necessary. His performance though absolutely brings you into his presence in that way, and one of the powerful examples of it, as Skarsgård face throughout this film is a fascinating kind of juxtaposition on all its own. Because in a certain sense, he is the stoic man, in which he is just compelling in that internalization. What is tremendous though is what he can do within that certain often purposeful constriction that never feels like a constriction. He tells the story of Amleth so often just through his face and does not falter within that. Take for example the raid sequence in which after his berzerker ferocity dies down, Skarsgård's eyes are distant and that of resignation as he looks upon the rest of the slaughter showing a man very much in an aimless state among the barbarians. Contrasting that with when a witch condemns the shirking of his fate, or really any of the witch or spiritual guide speaking of any ilk speaks to Amleth. As much as the other half's delivery is essential to such prophecies, it is Skarsgård's performance that grants them a connection. As in his eyes, and his reactions, he not only grants them profound tangible gravity he also personalizes them within the connection to Amleth, showing the man realizing his purpose, not as something that gives him relief but rather as this weight upon his soul. 

When Amleth finds his way to his uncle, now an exile with his family, lending himself into slavery in order to exact his revenge, Amleth takes upon different roles in turn so does Skarsgård. Skarsgård is great in presenting the guarded presence of the slavey who retires from most sight and does not seem to want to be looked upon, let alone do anything beyond what is expected of him. In that, though Skarsgård at a second's notice presents the cunning glint in the eye of Amleth. Skarsgård with as much ease conveys the sort of calculator but with a sense of the emotional connection of the man coming back to his stolen home, seeing his mother, and seeing the uncle that betrayed his family. Skarsgård doesn't simplify the emotion just because of the nature of the role seemingly as stoic, he is able to still have that stoic presence at times while bringing so much of a sense of the internalization of Amleth's struggle just underneath the most immediate surface. Skarsgård in a funny way perhaps is the bridge between what the studio probably wanted from the film and what Robert Eggers wanted, to which I honestly think the medium we found was fine by my measure. Skarsgård though achieves that by on one end being the proper expected "hero" (well Amleth technically falls under "least bad") with his commanding often quiet presence however just behind that filled with emotion and this is even through the romance we get with fellow slave/witch Olga (Anya Taylor-Joy). The latter even, Skarsgård brings the same conviction to as the romantic lead, not that this is that in a straightforward way, rather Skarsgård achieves this by in these moments with Taylor-Joy showing even this tiniest bit of relief of the man's burden albeit even for a moment. A glint of sincere affection, hope even, which speaks volumes even when lessened to even this minor degree. Again Skarsgård is the expected "hero" but achieves it not in exactly the old-school way. 

Skarsgård's performance realizes particularly potently both what you want from such a character in terms of the expectation but it also ends up being not quite the expectation as well. And no scene speaks more powerfully to this than the moment in which he goes to confront his mother (Nicole Kidman) ostensibly to offer his rescue for her from his terrible uncle. Unfortunately, rather than show her appreciation she rather reveals that she was glad that his father was killed having hated him the whole time. Skarsgård's reaction in this scene is amazing because in his eyes it is just horror or heartbreak to find out this truth, there is this fundamental break in his whole reality. The vulnerability suddenly that he reveals within Amleth at this moment is so tremendous and the sense of real disbelief at it is so profound in every second of it. His mother crushes the specific reality of his mission, and Skarsgård expresses the brutality this is upon the very concept of his life. And within this, vengeance in a way no longer is the simple quest to kill the bad guy and save the day for everyone. There is of course the dark ferocity as he goes about the remainder of his quest, which changes as he must defend the potential future of his own progeny, Skarsgård effectively playing contrasting notes between the real warmth in his moments with Olga against the sheer intensity of his violence as he goes about killing everyone associated with the old murder. There is no disconnection however as Skarsgård plays each note as truthfully as the other. And in turn, gives a more complex realization of this "hero's" journey, which again throughout hasn't been about satisfaction but rather this expectation of destiny to a degree. Take for example the final moment where the two men lay out the gauntlet for their duel, in this moment, where Amleth has killed two her swore not to, though really he had very little choice in the matter, Skarsgård's face isn't of satisfaction but rather a kind of resignation. Again though on the theme of subversion with living up to the expectation, Skarsgård delivers that in the final duel in the belly of the volcano, and I just want to highlight the great screaming acting that marks the final moment of his performance. Screaming can be pretty ridiculous on its own but  Skarsgård shows how to properly activate it here in the final moment where it appears he may die without achieving his goal. His screams begin as just the visceral pain of his wounds, however, with each scream Skarsgård conveys the man finding his strength and determination until his final one is filled with such tremendous power. A particularly brilliant bit of performance, as it is just all screams, but with each scream, Skarsgård managed to convey that final will to fulfill his destiny. Skarsgård delivers here a great performance that meets the challenge of this role. He is the stoic hero seeking revenge, but he is also so much more than that. Completely convincing us of that journey, of this world, but also enriching it with a genuine emotional depth through all of it.  

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

First! Hey Louis, at some point will we get a full list of all of your nominees and top 10-20 for this year?

Also, will we get an updated ranking of all of the Oscar nominated performances from every year?

Anonymous said...

Hey Louis, have you read “Reviewing Performances”, the female equivalent to this blog? Are there any other blogs like this for female performances?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the cast, direction and screenplay. Any rating upgrades.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Although the film has lost a bit of its staying power with me, can't deny that this is a pretty awesome performance by him.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: After Nosferatu, which 5 time periods would you love to see Eggers tackle next.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I doubt it would give him much satisfaction updating that list.

Luke Higham said...

Which past films do you think Eggers would've been perfect for. After watching The Northman a 2nd time, I felt that he would've been perfect for Lord Of The Rings if it hadn't yet been filmed.

Luke Higham said...

If not then Children Of Hurin would be best suited to him.

Emi Grant said...

It was a bit of a wait to get to this review, but I'm glad it's finally here. A very satisfying 5 review for Skarsgard.

A bit of a random question Louis, and it's ok if it's better to save it for later, but after re-watching Season 2 of Better Call Saul for like, the fifth time, I was wondering, how do you think Michael McKean would fare on the role of Anthony in The Father?

If anything I do think he might lack the incredibly warm presence of Anthony Hopkins, but re-watching that scene on the stretcher from Klick, I really think he could rise up to the challenge of portraying the character's vulnerability and the difficulty of his condition.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on HBO's Napoleon series finally going into production.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Emi: Pretty good choice. In fairness I don't think McKean is far behind Hopkins in terms of being very warm if the role demands that, though he rather represents a "best bud since childhood" type of presence as opposed to Hopkins' grandfatherly one.

Matt Mustin said...

Great performance. I've always liked him and it was great to finally see him front and center in a role where he could show off how good he is.

Michael McCarthy said...

It’s funny, when I saw The Northman I thought to myself “I don’t know if I’d give this performance a five, but I have no doubt in my mind that Louis will.”

Anonymous said...

Every time Napoleon's old project appears I always ask myself if Kubrick were alive these days what would he do? Make a film for Warner, make a mini series or offer it for some streaming?

Calvin Law said...

He's very good here, and I do very much agree the technical omissions for this throughout awards season was strange.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Well, I'm been slowly giving my tens as requested, lead will come soon along with the female categories.

Sorry but an emphatic no on the second, the list is just too unwieldy. Not really a fan of very general "all-time" lists for the very same reason.

Anonymous:

I have, Giuseppe used to be a regular around here. Fritz and the Oscars doesn't update frequently, but still has a backlog of reviews. There were several others that as far as I know are defunct now.

Luke:

Kidman - (Her performance is interesting because one might question her casting until it reveals itself. Although on re-watch her scene with Hawke is very interesting and actually paints her work later on considerably differently, in that she doesn't play those moments as the overt prisoner but rather in a way she is even trying to work the system in those moments. Her big scene is with Amleth of course, where she is amazing, and I would say in some ways Kidman plays the role even more nefarious than as written. Because Kidman doesn't play it as an overt victim rather she presents her character as very much knowing the system she exists in and finding any manipulation she can to play the system. Kidman in a sense suggests doesn't care about anyone really, even Fjolnir, in other than for her he was probably easier to manipulate than Aurvandill had been. We see that in her moment of attempting to seduce Amleth which Kidman plays as straight in the attempt to see if she basically can move her source of control to her next spot, and see how he reacts based on her unleashing of all her disregard for her old family. That moment just being so very striking in itself where again Kidman very much plays into just how callous the queen is and powerfully so.)

Taylor-Joy - (I mean she has a great credit in just being seemingly fitting to any period you would want to place her in. She fits in wherever you put her. That's the case here once again and she excels in being able to play at any moment. Interestingly she plays a different shade of what Kidman is doing, in showing the same sort of survivalist manipulation but just being less aggressively callous about it. Specifically in her chemistry with Skarsgard, she delivers sincerity in a romance of mutual desperation in a way, but what she brings wholly works in that sense. Also like Skarsgard throwing herself into the intensity of it all so well, particularly in her final scene where she does well to play big the incantation but always brings genuine emotion within the desperation of the moment.)

Hawke - (Always impressive with how much range he really does have as once again can disappear far from the modern man, and is believable as such a King. Although he doesn't have too much to do, I did love the affectionate moments you get mixed in with the sort of grayer sense of resignation within his situation and potential evils he himself is part of just as he is.)

Dafoe, Bjork & Sigurosson - (All exist within a similar notion and all are great in this notion. This in throwing themselves with such intense conviction in these dramatic mythic messages that are filled with as much insanity as you would say logic. Each is intense in its own potent and fascinating way. Dafoe in his pestering way as the fool, Bjork as truly mythical in seeming most beyond the world, and Sigurosson having a wonderful balance between the two.)

Louis Morgan said...

Bang - (Found his performance more impressive on re-watch in what he does do in the margins of the work, where I think he does bring a bit more nuance than just being the bastard you want to see die. He certainly is that and effectively so in the moments of particularly intensely cold hate towards his victims. Throughout though I think he shows that there is more humanity in this as even when he reacts to the fool's taunt, Bang plays it more so he is genuinely upset at the Queen being dishonored than suspicion being fallen on him. Later on every loss, you feel genuine desperation after every act. I especially love the moment of throwing down the gauntlet as his resignation is with genuine sadness, and his final battle with Skarsgard, there's much more than hate going on in the battle, almost a strange kind of understanding between the foes in this moment.)


As much as I'm a big fan of the cast Eggers's direction is the star of the film. Again the sheer attention to detail in the aesthetic is masterful in his clear inspection of every front, and mastery of this technique that is so rare. There isn't a facet of the film that feels contrasting, rather they cohere to immerse you as much as possible. That is attention to detail, to period, but also just through his own touches of further immersing you in the style of cinematography, the use of sound, and the choices of a score. No facet is disparate from Eggers's direction. That includes the aforementioned performances, which are essential in crafting the world. Of course, I think Eggers direction goes beyond that even which is a fascinating mix between harsh brutality and operatic grandeur. That is the action and violence, are as gritty as it comes, lensed with such intensity throughout the film, such as the one shot through the village and every little bit there that just shows how unforgiving the period was. Moments like this are throughout where he just doesn't relent. At the same time though, I love the more operatic strokes, that are specific but so powerful, whether it be the fever dream moments of the witchcraft, the truly spectacular moments alluding to the family tree, or the ride to Valhalla which is one of my favorite singular images of 2022, and of course the dramatic battle in the Volcano which is very specifically this mix between such viciousness but grand since it is in the middle of a volcano. Eggers crafts a one-of-a-kind epic, that they don't make these days, but they also never made them quite like this which is hard to say for a period piece or a story related to Hamlet.

Louis Morgan said...

The screenplay obviously has more or less the structure laid out by the legend, but also a bit from Shakespeare's own adaptation of it in Hamlet. Of course, if the structure works, don't break it, and in that, since it has all the essential beats of the man's motivation, his tricks, then the dramatic resolution of it all. The Eggers hardly take a simplistic route in any moment though in just the choices in terms of the staging of so many scenes, the spiritual segues, and even the added subversion by the changes to the Queen (brilliant changes that thematically enrich this tale and speaks more so n some ways to the time.) The dialogue though is perhaps their greatest risk and challenge, and again if the actors didn't pull it off it would've faltered regardless. Still, once again they are quite brilliant in managing to craft the stylized period dialect without making seem too alien, too silly, or not seeming right. The dialogue though is yet another aspect of the immersion successfully so that doesn't make it seem alien strangely enough rather pulls us all the more into the specifics of it, which feels right to period and just enlivens the very world of the Northman. If one were to lobby a criticism of the screenplay the midsection is slightly episodic, however, episodes do build, though less taut in a certain sense than the opening and the ending scenes. Not a major criticism for me, and for my measure is more than made up for how every one of those episodes is presented to us.

Periods:

American West (Well traveled but would love to see his take).
French Revolution
Fall of the Roman Empire (Like the west I'd feel like he'd throw out the "guidebook" so I'd love to see what that would look like.)
The Black Plague
Boer Wars

Film:

The Revenant (I think he would've made the best version honestly)
Barry Lyndon
The Night of the Hunter

Emi Grant:

I could see it as part of Saul as a man struggling with the state of his mind, though I think he might not nail as much of the more overtly charming aspects of the character (the interview scene) and nor would be as menacing. Would be a different take but I could see it.

Luke:

I'll believe it when I see it, only because they can even shoot something and still not release it (Like the Affleck/Schoenaerts Lewis and Clark series). Will be interested to see it if it comes out to see kind of what Kubrick's vision, in general, was, though it will be notable if the director (is it still Fukunaga?) does their own thing beyond the script, or tries to their best guess at what Kubrick would've done.

Anonymous said...

Louis what would be your adapted screenplay top ten?

Anonymous said...

Louis what are your adapted and original screenplays top ten?

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Adapted Screenplay:

My Nominees:

All Quiet on the Western Front
Bones and All
Living
The Northman
Puss in Boots: The Last Wish

Rest of the Top Ten:

6. The Batman
7. The Phantom of the Open
8. Top Gun: Maverick
9. The Quiet Girl
10. Emergency

Marcus said...

Louis: Could I have your thoughts on the voice acting from this short scene from Dragon Ball Z?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePEmIMp2etA&ab_channel=xHellAMVz

8000S said...

He was fantastic, so was the entire movie, frankly.

Luke Higham said...

Director top 5 prediction.
1. Spielberg
2. Park
3. Eggers (The analysis itself pretty much puts him in runner-up contention)
4. McDonagh
5. Berger/Field

Anonymous said...

Louis what is your original screenplay top ten?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: If RRR was India's submission, do you think it would have made the International Feature top 5? Part of me thinks it could have been #2 or #3 behind All Quiet and Argentina 1985, but Decision to Leave's omission gives me pause.

Louis Morgan said...

Marcus:

A little over the top on the whole, though I did feel there was a little bit of nuance there towards the end.

Anonymous:

Original Screenplay:

My Nominees:

The Banshees of Inisherin
Decision to Leave
The Fabelmans
The Menu
Tar

Rest of the Top Ten:

6. Everything Everywhere All At Once
7. Return to Seoul
8. Turning Red
9. RRR
10. Triangle of Sadness

Tahmeed:

No, because it didn't make the BAFTA five. I think in the end many just really liked "Naatu Naatu", and maybe its over the top energy was too much for the often very serious category from the get go.