Saturday 2 January 2021

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1970: Charlton Heston in Julius Caesar

Charlton Heston did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Mark Antony in Julius Caesar. 

I decided to go elsewhere in the lineup mainly by virtue that I previously covered a powerhouse Shakespearean Heston turn built around a great speech. Then when starting to write my response to give thoughts on his work, it became quite long anyways, so might as well make it an official review. That being said, this is another powerhouse Shakespearean turn by Heston. Where in the 53 version it was a matter of dueling speeches between Mason and Brando rejecting Caesar and praising him. In this version there is no duel to be had, Heston simply owns the second speech, but also might as well be the entirety of the film. It is fascinating the way that Heston isn't usually an actor one thinks of as this deeply emotional performer, but when he's speaking Shakespeare it is hard to describe as anything but. Heston is brilliant here within the speech this as he essentially makes an entire event within itself in his single speech. This as he performs his Antony as true to his intention to remember Caesar, but also to seek revenge within the speech. This as he opens it with an initial sense of grief before falling back into himself, until leading the people into fascination of the will. Heston playing around with the will in part this intentional manipulation in his eyes, but also a vicious hate that is wholly genuine that reveals itself every time he speaks of the "honorable men" who killed his friend. Heston controlling the crowd one parts the greatest eulogy one can give, but also a conductor controlling the crowd to his will. Each moment Heston imbues with such potency. This particularly as he looks upon the body of the murdered Caesar. Heston is amazing as every word drifts off his tongue with such magnificence in Heston's delivery. This as the words themselves are not only magnetic in Heston's deliver, but there is such a sense of the emotional quality within the state still of Antony. This in being a man wishing to reek havoc on the conspirators. Again though I also love the moments where Heston tempers himself, and uses a calmer expression of his voice when specifically manipulating the crowd. This again his whole manner is simply conducting each man to his will, as he directs them with a calmer purpose. Heston artfully moves back and forth within the speech making the speech both truthful and a strategic manipulation. It is a shame Heston didn't perform Shakespeare more often as in both instances there is a ferocity and emotional intensity of his work that was rarely seen within him. Strangely enough, the words of the bard seemed to compel him to let loose more than ever as a performer. This being a striking example, that puts one of his co-stars in particular to shame, of Heston thriving beyond the expectations of himself his performer. Heston's typical strong presence is of course here, but there is far more than that. Although true the role is largely the speech, however it is the highlight of the film, particularly given how dull Robards is as Brutus. It deserves higher praise though as Heston's delivery is that of a brilliant version of Julius Caesar, even if the rest of the film doesn't meet that standard, Heston elevates every second he is onscreen to deliver this dynamic and quite mesmerizing portrayal of Caesar's most loyal man. 

50 comments:

Luke Higham said...

I'm pleased you reviewed him.

Michael McCarthy said...

YES thank you for this!!! I’d go for a full 5 and he’d be my runner up behind Warner. I’ll also be keeping an eye the ‘72 Lead Bonus Rounds where Heston’s Antony may just reappear...

Anonymous said...

Luke, what are you looking forward to most when we return to 2016.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: War & Peace/The Night Manager/The Hollow Crown

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of Tora! Tora! Tora!
Films To Watch:
Kes
Loving
Figures In A Landscape
Deep End
Rider On The Rain
King Lear (Juri Jarvet)
Witchhammer
Soldier Blue
Jealousy, Italian Style
A Swedish Love Story

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

1. Warner
2. Oates
3. Plummer
4. Kinski
5. Cribbins

GM said...

1. Warner
2. Oates
3. Cribbins
4. Plummer
5. Kinski

Anonymous said...

1. Warner
2. Oates
3. Plummer
4. Kinski
5. Cribbins
Luke your top ten david warner performances with ratings

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
5
1. The Ballad Of Cable Hogue
2. Time After Time
4.5
3. Little Malcolm
4. Cross Of Iron
5. The Bofors Gun
6. A Christmas Carol
7. Tom Jones
4
8. Time Bandits
9. The Omen
10. From Beyond The Grave

Shaggy Rogers said...

1. Howard
2. Malden
3. Warner
4. Oates
5. Mills
6. Plummer
7. Heston
8. Guinness
9. Kinski
10. McKern

Louis Morgan said...

Watched Minari, which is great. This one just is so incredibly rich in terms of the quiet appreciation of the life of this family, and a film very much about the American dream in a rather wonderful. Free from obvious melodrama, even the more dramatic moments feel very natural and earned, and just a charming and heartfelt piece. Reminded of a more modern, though still technically period take, on The New Land honestly, in the best of ways.

Han - 5
Youn - 5
Cho - 4
Patton - 4

Luke:

The Pizza Triangle is Jealousy, Italian Style.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Everyone is more than decent in Tora! Tora! Tora!, but every role is very, and I'll say purposefully, functional.

Luke Higham said...

Thoughts on the cast. Happy you're saving Kim as well.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: What rating would ild you give Edward Woodward for the 1984 Christmas Carol?

Luke Higham said...

Robert: If I'm not mistaken, Louis gave him a 3.

Anonymous said...

Louis what would be your winner for visual effects for 1970?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Luke: That sounds WAY too low. He should be a 4.5 at a minimum.

Luke Higham said...

Robert: I know, a 3's very harsh in my opinion.

Luke Higham said...

You can find it on Mikkelsen's review for Casino Royale.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Han - (Her performance very much is what so much of the film is in microcosm. This just being a purely and wholly honest performance. This as there is no moment you don't feel you are just watching this person within this world. This with a lot of technical brilliance within it, even if it is so naturally, even covertly utilized. This in portraying the different way she reacts towards Yeun, towards her children and towards people outside the family. This in her shyness when dealing with only English speakers, against the more brazen manner within her own language. She's wonderful in creating such an honest sense of the conflict against Yeun, this in portraying these natural frustrations towards the day to day existence rather than dealing with his greater dream. Every one of their intimate scenes is a marvel as you feel you are seeing decades of history in their fights, as they are so complex just as they are natural. Fantastic work.)

Youn - (I will formally request that Calvin focus the majority of his bile towards potential future snubs on this category, as this is not a stuffed category in the least and Youn should be guaranteed a spot. I'll say at least the critics are doing their part this year, when they really let down Zhao by just going with the Dern hype train. Anyways what really makes me mention this, is if you think about it, this performance is basically the great version of what Glenn Close should be doing in Hillbilly Elegy, in fact this film reminded me of that film in many moments, of just seeing great film-making against terrible film-making with somewhat related material...somewhat. Anyway, on her own Houn is just absolutely wonderful in every respect of her work. This in being the off-beat grandmother, not as a caricature but a genuine person. This showing sort of the culture clash of it all, but also her attempts to kind of try hard to be a loving grandmother while dealing with potentially hostile grandchildren. She finds such an elegant and moving balance in these moments. Moments that are deeply affecting but also can be quite funny, but also so naturally delivered by Youn. I'll say I was concerned that the second half of her performance would be limited, but even with that I was quite impressed by her physical work, and the fact that she made all the greater emotional impact within her reactions. Just absolutely outstanding work.)

Cho - (Kind of overshadowed by design within the film, but I did think she brought the right natural sort of "big sister" qualities needed in her moments. She doesn't really get a lot of moments to herself, but I liked how she fit within the family dynamics to be sure.)

Patton - (Doing his best Stephen Root doing this performance impression I think. I quite enjoyed his work here and I even think he bordered on potentially sticking out within the film. I felt though he managed to never go too far with his off-beat characterization and in the end became endearing in his own idiosyncratic sort of way.)

Robert:

I'll admit I've always been too philosophical about the part of the Spirit of Present, towards his portrayal, feeling perhaps it should be more overtly warm as is the traditional take, because what he does he does extremely well, that of the far more confrontational, even punitive, in his manner towards Scrooge throughout. Though re-watching very recently I did feel he definitely carries warmth as well, even if overall his take focuses on an innate intensity, but really I should appreciate the daring of it, and the success of it within itself.

Anonymous:

Please refer to "My Wins".

Luke Higham said...

Louis: What rating would you give him now.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Based solely on his own merits, 4.5.

Anonymous said...

Louis now that you've seen Minari what do you make of its Oscar chances?

Calvin Law said...

Louis: I agree so much on The New Land comparison. In turn I do think that is also one thing that could hurt its chances overall with awards due to the lack of melodrama with some of the performances, though I do think overall it is awards friendly enough it might be too subtle for some. I’m so, so glad you loved it though. Also true on the Close/Youn comparison and I do hope that contrast will further incentivise voters to ahem...do the right thing.

Louis: your brief thoughts on the score and cinematography to Minari.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Aside from One Night In Miami, Pieces Of A Woman and Falling, could you also check out Saint Maud when you have the chance. It's Kermode's favourite of 2020.

Calvin Law said...

Saint Maud is probably going to be near impossible to track down stateside for Louis. For some reason A24 has been particularly bad at releasing films this year (even its UK release wasn’t great in terms of accessibility).

Michael McCarthy said...

1. David Warner
2. Warren Oates (could definitely be argued as co-lead though)
3. Bernard Cribbins
4. Klaus Kinski
5. Christopher Plummer

Kinski and Plummer are close and I might change them if one of them is reviewed first. I went with Kinski just because of how monumentally better a film he seems to be in than the other characters (likely because he didn’t know he was in a Dracula movie when they were filming it). I’d also feel bad putting my request last.

Luke Higham said...

Michael: Your ratings for Oates, Cribbins, Kinski and Plummer.

Bryan L. said...

Louis or Luke: Wait, do we have to submit our prediction in this review or can it be in the next? Since Heston technically wasn't in the lineup.

Luke Higham said...

Bryan: It'll be fine for the next review.

Calvin Law said...

Also, Louis: do you think Yeun could be argued as supporting? I don’t actually think it would’ve been that fraudulent to campaign him there and he’d have a much better chance of getting in, but I’m not going to hate on the choice because he is lead my in my books, and I respect that Yeun and A24 are going for the bigger risk (and probably didn’t envisage Ahmed being as big a contender as he is, which I should make clear I am also so down for getting in).

Bryan L. said...

Luke: Thanks.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Sadly if anything my estimation for it has gone down. One big reason was I forgot it was being distributed by A24, which has really been doing terribly in terms of getting nominations since Ladybird. As in they couldn't get Ethan Hawke a nomination despite ruling the critics awards, and they were the ones who were part of the 0 nominations for the Farewell. Secondly it also probably appeals to the same voter bloc as the Nomadland supporters, hopefully there is enough love to go around, but unfortunately its another knock against its chances. I still will predict Youn, who just too hard to believe that she will be ignored in that field, though I wish I could call her a lock. It SHOULD be an EASY SAG Ensemble nominee, SHOULD be, but sadly I don't know if it will be.

Luke:

I've been looking for it actually, unfortunately Calvin's statement is correct.

Calvin:

"brief thoughts" I assume in hope that I'll be covering them in more detail on nomination day? If that's the case I appreciate the optimism.

I even share the hope as both would be extremely deserving of nominations, the score in particular would be a great choice for a winner. The score, that completely accidentally feels musically similar to Nomadland, though as this more overtly hopeful and playful riff on that style. The cinematography actually similar as well, in its great appreciation for the American landscape, though again with a greater optimistic focus, with the approach accentuating lush green fields and beautiful skies.

I think you could easily argue Kim as the sole lead, or perhaps even calling it a pure ensemble, I put him, Yeun and Han as leads though because I feel the focus is on David's personal journey, and the relationship of the husband and wife defined by his farming dream. I wouldn't describe it as category fraud though to put the parents in supporting, particularly not for Han, even if I don't personally.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: yep, a great deal of naive optimism, though if they don't I might ask in greater detail down the line if you don't mind.

Calvin Law said...

And yeah who knows what's going on with A24? I know they lost their premiere awards season strategist to Netflix and campaigning is always expensive (something I do dislike about the awards circuit since at the end of the day it shouldn't be that relevant how much money a studio/distributor spends, but it is what it is), but there's no reason they would be doing this badly. Although in all honesty there haven't been that many very Oscar friendly A24 films as of late.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Would love to, and given my own affection for the film, I hope your optimism pays off.

Michael McCarthy said...

Luke: 4.5 for Cribbins, 4/4.5 for Kinski. Still ruminating on the exact rating for the other two.

Anonymous said...

Louis: When do you plan on revealing your Top 10 films of 2020 list? Will you wait until March, or are there any other releases you want to check out before you decide.

Anonymous said...

Louis: If he hadn't gotten health problems which lead to his retirement, which roles do you think William Powell would have been great in the 60's?

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

There's no reason to wait until March, I honestly post it typically after I've seen most major critically acclaimed releases. As again, something like Judas and the Black Messiah will not be considered for 2020's top ten. So, basically I'll be posting it after I've seen One Night in Miami, around the 15th, as I should be able to Pieces of a Woman, and a few other films between now and then.

Anonymous:

Parnell Emmett McCarthy
Benjamin Rand
Willy Clark

Luke Higham said...

1. Warner
2. Oates
3. Cribbins
4. Plummer
5. Kinski

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

1. Warner
2. Oates
3. Cribbins
4. Plummer
5. Kinski

Anonymous said...

1. Warner
2. Oates
3. Cribbins
4. Plummer
5. Kinski

Anonymous said...

Anonymous2: I'll change mine as well.
1. Warner
2. Oates
3. Cribbins
4. Plummer
5. Kinski

Anonymous said...

Luke and other commenters, what performance do you hope louis upgrades in the future and what performances were you disappointed that louis did not upgrade?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'll pick one and it's Anthony Hopkins in The Remains Of The Day. An anonymous user intends to recommend a rewatch if Louis is going ahead with recommendations after this lineup and I personally would like a re-examination before his review for The Father. I was abit disappointed for Guinness but I have no hard feelings about any decisions he makes, aside from that one time many years ago when DDL was only a 4.5 for There Will Be Blood.

Mitchell Murray said...

Anonymous: I wouldn't mind seeing upgrades for Clive Owen in "Closer", Robert de Niro in "Silver Linings Playbook" and Lucas Hedges in "Manchester by the Sea". They are a 4/3.5/4 for myself, respectively, and I still find it odd that Louis liked de Niro less than Arkin or Jones.

Bryan L. said...

If I’m not mistaken, Saint Maud comes out on Digital/DVD on February 1st (in the UK at least), so there could be an online copy up around that point.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the screenplay for Patton? I sometimes forget it was co-written by THE Francis Coppola.

Matthew Montada said...

Hey folks. I have a few films to catch up on since i just came back from a trip to Tennessee (mostly Oscar Contenders like Nomadland, Promising Young woman, Minari, etc.). First one i just finished watching was Nomadland. Absolutely in love with this film. Louis and Calvin pretty much have said what needs to be said about this film. One of the best of the year. I have my review here in Letterboxd if you guys wanna check it out.

https://letterboxd.com/matt_0515/film/nomadland/

Here are my ratings for the cast:
Frances McDormand - 5
David Strathairn - 4.5
Linda May - 3.5
Charlene Swankie - 4
Bob Wells - 4
Peter Spears - 3