Friday 15 January 2021

Alternate Best Actor 1999: Bob Hoskins in Felicia's Journey

Bob Hoskins did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Joe Hilditch in Felicia's Journey. 

As with almost any of Atom Egoyan's films I'd categorize as good (though a bit drawn out and suffers from being a bit top heavy when it comes to interesting characters), Felicia's Journey is a strange, though intriguing, bird of film about a older man who tries to "help" a young desperate pregnant woman, Felicia. 

Always hate coming onto a performance late as I finalize a year, as I really should've just taken the time for Bob Hoskins here, as this performance is unlike anything else that I'd seen from Hoskins. Now I've always been a fan of Hoskins's as an actor, with his potent bottled up presence, that almost seemed to hide a great emotional range. This found in his great performances in Mona Lisa and The Long Good Friday, as different kinds of volatile men, and of course his low key hilarious yet still emotional work in Who Framed Roger Rabbit?. This though is something quite different from Hoskins's as his very presence has no traits of a working class, or once working class, bruiser. This man is something else. This is found right off in Hoskins's instantly curious and fascinating work. This in his more affected accent. This with a sort of odd politeness innate within his voice. For a lack of a better shortcut, Hoskins kind of plays this part as though he was Ian Holm playing this part, and that is high praise. This as Hoskins erases your mind of those other turns, in his gentler voice he brings here, but also his manner that matches the same. We see him as this commercial chef and as so there is a fanciful manner to this man that Hoskins creates, that grants us some sense of who he is, and keeps us quite intrigued in what he might be. 

We follow many scenes of Joe just living through the day, and there is something even in this within Hoskins's performance. There is a levity to it, though not in the sort of comedic sense. Rather Hoskins is way of movement here is almost a way of floating through a given scene. He doesn't quite interact as is the normal way, marking Joe with this strange kind of very odd kind of grace. Hoskins is rather mesmerizing just to watch be here, as you can't instantly decipher the man, and part of the fascination is watching Hoskins give us hints. This as we see him preparing a meal, while watching a TV chef (who we will later learn is his long dead mother), Hoskins's performance has a kind of violence in the preparation. When eating the meal, and watching the woman still, Hoskins's performance is one of sheer brilliance. This sort of boyish curiosity he brings in examining the meal, and a comfort as he bites as though he is a baby being fed by his mother. There is something unquestionably off-putting about it, but what I love is how enigmatic it is just the same. Hoskins doesn't immediately tells us exactly who Joe is exactly. He creates a mystery about the man, and really is the facet of the film that reels you into it. This as there's just something about Hoskins's performance that makes you want to learn more about this man, even if you may be concerned with that might exactly go. 

Now we see Joe as he begins to offer some advice to Felicia, and there is just something about that accent that Hoskins uses here. It is a masterstroke, as it is this incredible combination of comfort and discomfort at the same time. This as he speaks so gently that at quick glance, particularly if someone was need of help of any kind, it is with that of just a good intention if off man, but spending more time with it, there's just something not quite right about it. Felicia eventually more directly takes Joe's help as he begins to give her rides. Hoskins's performance is everything as he asks her questions with that small voice of his, seemingly comforting. When she mentions she's pregnant though, there is a smile, and change of tone of his expression that is most unnerving. Hoskins portraying Joe's "charity" to perhaps not be some simple kindness of a lonely man. There is a strange game though we see when Felicia reveals any vulnerability as Joe puts forth the utmost empathy it would seem. Again it is with perhaps a quirk, or something worse, that he offers his words of wisdom, but Hoskins himself doesn't portray this as facade exactly even. There is something more demented going on than just that. This as see a progression of other young desperate women that Joe's "helped" in the past. 

Hoskins's work here is outstanding, and part of why he is so fascinating to watch, is he presents a man who is in a strange world of his own at all times. This developed from his equally strange relationship with mother we see in flashback. Hoskins even in a moment of Joe just watching a clip of Salome, there is a man starting on some alternate wavelength of experience. When we see him speak to Felicia of his fake wife, Hoskins speaks with overtures of the good nature of parenthood, but even in this, he's kind of outside of the conversation even as he's speaking directly to her. Hoskins portraying a man who is always thinking within some other realm even when within this process that one would assume would be more symbiotic. It is in this that Hoskins alludes to what Joe really is doing with all this. This as he develops the sense of the man's mind where his interaction is always with a strange kind of detachment and self-obsession. When speaking of his fake wife, even killing her technically by saying she has died in hospital, his words turned as though he is almost speaking to himself still. This as he tells himself this story just as he is telling her. This performance is quite terrifying as Hoskins reveals Joe's nature as more sinister in each successive scene. This as we slowly come to realize that Joe is in fact a serial killer of these young women, and Hoskins paints a most unnerving portrait of the way this man goes about his ways.
 
 This as he brings Felicia along, with a cherub's smile and a country priest's voice. This though in moments bringing forth the nature of the hate that is simmering within him, that Hoskins evokes in wholly chilling moments as Joe becomes more determined with his current "charity".  When Joe goes about finally planning to kill her, Hoskins is so matter of fact in the movements, which is particularly off-putting as we see a man who likely has gone through this kind murder again and again. When he describes putting the girls to "sleep" as he's in the process of killing Felicia, suddenly that gentle voice of becomes something truly disturbing. The only point in which the man's world seems to completely break, as he attempts to wrap up his crime, two Christian missionaries come calling. Hoskins's incredible as he shows the final break in the man as he watches their presentation to him. Hoskins's voice loses any of its grace, his manner is not longer lost in its state. There is desperation, a fear, a man suddenly blunted by a random reality that penetrates his typical deranged state. Hoskins brilliantly internalizing the breakdown within the man almost in sheer disbelief when confronted with something then than his own delusions. Hoskins's performance presenting the greater degradation of the man's mind as he seems tp hold less and less into the delusion and in turn his psychosis is shown more overtly in every respect. His eyes filled with tears, his body wavering, and his voice quacking as his crimes are discovered. A man with no delusions left to cling to, therefore also no life to cling to. This is a fantastic work by Bob Hoskins that shows an even greater range than I already knew he had. A daring, and dynamic portrait of a most unusual and unhinged man. 

106 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Yay, another 5 for Hoskins. :)

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast.

Mitchell Murray said...

1) Hoskins
2) Mason
3) Woods
4) Anderson
5) Newman

Calvin Law said...

Okay wow. Definitely need to see this

1. Hoskins
2. Anderson
3. Mason
4. Newman
5. Woods

Also I watched News of the World and I’m like...why is stuff like this still considered Best Picture contender calibre stuff? I don’t think it’s a terrible film but there’s absolutely nothing in it besides some of the technical elements that even comes close to being subjectively awards worthy. And it’s so dated!! Having said that. I could definitely imagine someone like Tommy Lee Jones absolutely delivering on a version of this story

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I'm going back to my original prediction, I've always had a strong feeling about this performance.

1. Hoskins
2. Anderson
3. Mason
4. Newman
5. Woods

Aidan Pittman said...

1. Hoskins
2. Anderson
3. Mason
4. Newman
5. Woods

Matt Mustin said...

Genius performance that makes the film.

1. Hoskins
2. Mason
3. Anderson
4. Newman
5. Woods

Also, I watched the first two episodes of WandaVision which I LOOOOVED.

Stephen Patterson said...

1. Hoskins
2. Anderson
3. Mason
4. Newman
5. Woods

Bryan L. said...

1. Hoskins
2. Anderson
3. Mason
4. Newman
5. Woods

Robert MacFarlane said...

Perhaps it’s my own inherent cynicism towards the MCU, but so far I’m not huge on WandaVision’s idea of homage/pastiche. There’s no commentary, no substance beyond cuteness. I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised, but I keep seeing conceptual checks not being cashed. I never understood the idea of this sort of thing if you’re not going to actually say something about it. Granted, that kind of sums up my thoughts on the MCU outside Black Panther in terms of deeper themes. But concept deserves more meat to it.

Calvin Law said...

The only MCU content I'm going to check out this year are Shang Chi and Eternals, maybe Black Widow. I'll admit a year off from it has kind of dwindled my passion overall for it.

Matt Mustin said...

I don't know, I honestly do think WandaVision's really doing something cool.

Calvin Law said...

Matt: how’s the cinematography in it? I’ve heard varying responses.

Matt Mustin said...

Calvin: I like it. It replicates the old 50's sitcoms well. It's not amazing, but it does it's job.

Michael McCarthy said...

I chuckled a couple times at WandaVision, but honestly Mr. Robot did it better (and I don’t even like Mr. Robot that much).

Anonymous said...

1. Hoskins
2. Anderson
3. Mason
4. Newman
5. Woods

Luke, your top ten pieces of music from Fantasy/Sci-Fi films.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'll get back to you on that later today.

Calvin: Your top 5 Blackadder episodes.

Calvin Law said...

Luke: I’ll do a top 10.

1. Goodbyeee
2. Corporal Punishment
3. Sense and Senility
4. Dish and Dishonesty
5. General Hospital
6. Ink and Incapability
7. Private Plane
8. Captain Cook
9. Potato
10. Duel and Duality

Don’t read too much into the relative absence of Season 2 episodes. I just really love Seasons 3 and 4 so much.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

1. Hoskins
2. Mason
3. Anderson
4. Newman
5. Woods

Calvin Law said...

I saw Nine Days today and Winston Duke should definitely be a contender for the 2021 future lineup.

RatedRStar said...

1. Hoskins
2. Mason
3. Anderson
4. Newman
5. Woods

Matthew Brown said...

1. Hoskins
2. Anderson
3. Mason
4. Newman
5. Woods

Louis, your thoughts on Michael Fassbender in Prometheus.

Luke Higham said...

In regards to WandaVision, I was willing to give it a chance after the 'Daydream Believer' trailer but word of mouth here has changed my mind completely. I have no time for MCU shows at all. With the films, there's only a select few I really care about.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Have you seen Cobra Kai season 3 yet?

John Smith said...

1. Hoskins
2. Anderson
3. Mason
4. Newman
5. Woods

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
Fantasy:
Concerning Hobbits/The Bridge Of Khazad-Dûm - The Fellowship Of The Ring
The Riders Of Rohan - The Two Towers
Minas Tirith/The Lighting Of The Beacons - The Return Of The King
Dragonheart theme
Hedwig's Theme/Leaving Hogwarts - Harry Potter And The Philosopher's Stone
Lily's Theme - Deathly Hallows Part II
The Medallion Calls - Pirates Of The Caribbean: Curse Of The Black Pearl

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Cassidy - 3(I don't think her performance really quite capitalizes on the potential therein. I think she's more than fine in going through the general steps of the character, but her performance is in a way too passive for such a passive character. She should be overshadowed by Hoskins to an extent, but this is to a greater extent than was needed. Really her work should've worked around his, but is instead almost completely forgotten around it. She's still fine but the impact of the character could've been far greater if she managed to internalize more effectively.)

Khanjian - 3(Her scenes are often Egoyan's spotlight scenes in terms of direction that really makes her performance seem far more off-putting. This as her manner is that of the slightly overdone tv hostess and mother type. She does this well, but it is what is around her work that makes it all so striking.)

Karanj - 3.5(I actually like her work, as brief as it is in contrast to Hoskins. In showing someone who kind of is also on their own wavelength that differs than most same as Joe, but ends up bringing him down through this eventually and accidentally.)

Matthew:

I'm quite sure I covered that before.

Calvin:

Glad we agree on that one, I thought it might've been this year's Ford v. Ferrari for me (though I greatly prefer that film).

Tahmeed:

Just finished it.

Luke Higham said...

Forgive the lack of Princess Bride, I went with tracks that have stuck within my mind for much longer.

Anonymous said...

Louis: In retrospect, what did you think of the teaser trailer for True Grit.

Razor said...

1. Hoskins
2. Mason
3. Anderson
4. Newman
5. Woods

Calvin Law said...

Louis: your cast ranking for season 3 of Cobra Kai? I forgot to mention on here but I really dug it like Tahmeed. Especially all the character developments and certain upgrades (Eli finally being tolerable!) and loved the return of Chozen.

Calvin Law said...

And while I’m not sure if we needed that much added depth to Kreese it was certainly very well executed.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Not sure the song entirely works, but the editing does.

Calvin:

1. Yuji Okumoto (My favorite part of the season)
2. William Zabka
3. Xolo Mariduena
4. Ralph Macchio
5. Courtney Henggeler
6. Martin Kove
7. ?
8. Bret Ernst
9. Ron Thomas
10. Terry Serpico
11. Barrett Carnahan
12. Tamlyn Tomita
13. Ed Asner
14. Gianni DeCenzo
15. Jacob Bertrand
16. Mary Mouser
17. Tanner Buchanan
18. Vanessa Rubio
19. Payton List
20. Khail Everage

I'll admit when they pushed the "kids" acting this season, I only felt Mariduena was *fully* up to the task.

Luke Higham said...

Bridges is up to a 3.5.

Louis: Any upgrades for the rest of the cast.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

No, Barry Pepper=MVP, still stands for me.

Anonymous said...

Damn, really hoped for a Steinfeld upgrade. At least you liked Bridges a little more on this viewing.

Calvin Law said...

Thoughts on Okumoto? I also do agree to an extent, Mariduena is by far the best actor of the kids (List was definitely a weak link) but the writing and the adults made up for it. I also thought this season featured some of Macchio’s best work so far.

David Jones said...

1. Hoskins
2. Mason
3. Anderson
4. Newman
5. Woods

Louis: Have you ever seen Doctor Who.

Mitchell Murray said...

Louis: Yah, that updated review for Bridges more or less sums up my thoughts as well: I like the performance overall, but I won't defend all of his acting choices.

I would still put Firth ahead of him as well, since I was always slightly more positive towards his work.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Could I have your expanded thoughts on the cinematography for Pieces of a Woman? Thinking about it, it really made the film feel “off” for me. As in, the aesthetic didn’t really match the type of story/themes the film was about (or was attempting).

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Okumoto - (Thought he managed to do quite a bit of things in relatively limited screentime. This in half his performance is just pretty entertaining and funny. The first half "unintentionally" as the steadfast man that may or may not have been reformed and isn't giving Daniel an inch. His blunt delivery being a great contrast against Macchio portraying Daniel trying to figure this guy out. Then overtly, and "intentionally" funny when he directly trolls Daniel based on his old perspection of him. Both sides of that are wonderful but I really loved was Okumoto showing basically the potential of Chozen turning into a Miyagi type who has self-actualized. This as he brings so effectively the nobility spirit of the karate without overplaying it, but keeping it absolutely earnest. Finding the right heart within the words just as Moirta had done. My favorite moment of his though is his brief reflection on his state after the second film, and found Okumoto quite moving as he brings back those emotions in the moment only to reveal the better man that came from his hate. Loved what they did with his character, and thought Okumoto granted it an honest poignancy.)

David Jones:

No.

Bryan L. said...

(I get the feeling that the films’ aesthetic was more of the directors’ choice rather than the cinematographer himself though.)

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Well on the cinematographers actual front it is a well shot film, I'd say fairly objectively. There's just some remarkable scenes captured, particularly the fog on the bridge shot. The aesthetic, without keeping in mind the material, is rather vibrant and really seems rather pristine. Having said that, it all feels ill-fitting to the material. It looks like something more akin to if someone was making a callback to Douglas Sirk or something, not this attempt at some raw drama that the film aspires to be. Mind you a film could look beautiful and still hit that emotion, but the way director uses the cinematography here is odd. Makes the whole thing seem glossy which seemed against the idea of the film. Although I'd say cinematographer Benjamin Loeb more than did his job, it was in the service a poorly conceived notion by Kornél Mundruczó.

Emi Grant said...

Louis: Is the film The Climb a 2020 release by your rules? If so, any chances you could check that out?

Luke Higham said...

Emi: IMDB confirms it so I wouldn't worry about that.

Louis Morgan said...

Emi Grant:

I've seen it.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on it and the cast with ratings.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Are there any other 2020 films you've seen that haven't been mentioned.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Just finished Promising Young Woman. Just loved every minute of it, and that ending is right up there with Another Round's for my favorite of the year.

Ratings
Mulligan- 5 (Easily my Lead Actress win)
Burnham- 4 (Loved how the first half of his performance harkened back to Emory Cohen's in Brooklyn, but I felt he was quite effective with later revelations as well)
Brie- 3.5
Lowell- 2.5 (Interesting how they got two of the main actors from GLOW, and Lowell practically gives a far lesser iteration of that performance. That being said, he is part of what makes that ending oh so satisfying)
Greenfeld- 2.5
Brown- 3.5 (Didn't know Hadley from Shawshank could be such a warm father, nice performance)
Britton- 3
Coolidge- 2.5
Mintz- Plasse- 3
Molina- 3.5/4 (Really striking portrayal of guilt)

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Could I have your overall thoughts on Cobra Kai Season 3, and your thoughts on ?'s performance? I thought that even if the nostalgia was at risk of being overdone, I felt the way it was handled with their performance was terrific.

Emi Grant said...

Louis: Oh, have you given your thoughts on it before? I must have missed it.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Fantastic Mr. Fox with ratings and thoughts on the cast.

Thoughts on the direction, screenplay, art direction and score.

Matthew Brown said...

Louis, your thoughts on 'Boggis, Bunce and Bean' and 'Petey's Song'.

Mitchell Murray said...

Everyone: Thoughts on this in terms of animation, music and character representation?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHJvi_NfpGM

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

There are several, but honestly it means I only have minor enthusiasm towards them, if any, or am wholly indifferent.

The Climb I kind of liked. It's kind of funny in its odd and loose way of detailing a relationship that constantly influences sets of other relationships. It has some enjoyable moments, one involving doing Batman voices, and its relation moments are decently enough handled in definitely mumble-core sort of way, which I can quite hate. I didn't hate it here, so that is definitely a success to some degree.

Covino - 3.5(Much better here in his self-directed work here than his turn in News of the World. He's good though in bringing enough comedy as the goof off and even as the depressed goof off. He's enjoyable in really the consistency of the guy just seeming to be screwed up in a few ways, but enough of a kind of endearing energy even within his most despicable qualities.)

Marvin - 3(Best described as a lug. His performance though does work in a largely passive way of the guy whose emotions are pretty limited even in times of distress, basically deferring to his best friend's reaction. Marvin's performance in turn is passive to this degree but effectively so in creating the chemistry with Covino as two doofuses.)

Rankin - 4(Her performance is the best in the film. This in creating sort of the most within the idea of the dealing with the some ways toxic relationship at the center. She's good in very much not being just a shrew, even as the character is written in some ways. Rankin never simplifies the performance to suit this, rather showing her moments of anger and attack towards Covino's Mike as something wholly earned. This though with balance in creating the perspective as she finds the right sort of signs a kind uncertainty within the relationship even as she speaks towards support of it.)

Tahmeed:

Overall I enjoyed the season. I think it works best, once again in two lanes. This being either the pure Johnny stuff, which always manages to find a good mix of comedy while also being heartfelt, and anything involving Daniel that alludes to Miyagi, this particularly here in the Japanese visit. This as just Johnny's ongoing redemption story continues to work well in a subversion of the original films, while the other keeps the spirit of the films alive. Apart from that I did like Daniel's home story as well, particularly how Amanda was used, and the climax involving the special guest.

Now the Kreese past stuff I think as written was fine, if not wholly necessary really, I'm fine with him just being almost pure evil. I do think the production design and visual directing though of those scenes left more than a little to be desired, but it is what it is, and they weren't terrible.

Now the kids stuff stays perhaps a little too ridiculous for its own good, and is strictly in Karate Kid 3 territory at this point in how the situation just is absolutely over the top. Even with that it has enough of a humor about it, to still kind of work, even if I think it is the element that shows I think the series has a certain self-life. Still don't hate anything there either, though did they need to make one hate Robbie even more? Still, what I enjoy about the series I still really enjoy, and what I'm less enthusiastic about, still kind of has a certain charm even when quite silly.

As for ?, was a definite fan of the performance, particularly as I feel it was true to the original nature of the character. This as she didn't try to bring some Oscar-nominated style pathos to the part or anything like that. She was rather true to the character she was, and I liked that she brought the same charm within that. This particularly in her moments with both Zabka and Macchio, where she brought just the right sort of warmth and sense of nostalgia in their moments together. I also appreciated the redemption for the character in giving the other side to the story at the opening of Karate Kid 2.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Did you see Mulan.

Anonymous said...

Luke, your thoughts on Tom Hardy in Oliver Twist, if you’ve seen it

Calvin Law said...

Mulan sunk all the way from a 4 to a 2.5 for me on reflection though I still stand by Tzi Ma’s performance.

Also on the note of reviews I reckon if Rylance ends up being an alternate, Abdul Mateen-II and Redmayne could be easily reviewed in the same review with him especially since they share quite a few scenes together.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I haven't seen it in full, but he was definitely good from what I remember. I've only seen the Polanski version in full from that decade.

Mitchell Murray said...

Calvin: I'll admit, I'm still somewhat conflicted about Redmayne. I admire his general approach in the role, and his way of portraying Tom's zealous but misplaced passion. I think he's especially good in the scenes after Tom unconsciously stands for the Judge, and the shame he conveys in his attempts to defend himself.

That said, his accent still prevented me from liking him as much as Rylance or Cohen. For me, I had the same nitpick with him as I did with Tom Holland in "The Devil All The Time", where I could see the effort being put into his inflections and mouth posturing. I just found it a tad distracting throughout (particularly in his early scenes), and something that kept me a certain distance from an otherwise interesting turn.

Louis Morgan said...

Watched the first episode of Wandavision, which I enjoyed, though I would entirely agree with Robert's point. Then again I really think that is par for course for the MCU, which has perfected movie as "product" honestly. I don't even mean that in a disrespectful term exactly either, rather what they make for the most part is entertaining. That is an achievement (just ask some DCEU movies and Rise of Skywalker) however whenever I hear reviews saying things like "Marvel is so successful at tackling different genres" like for example Ant-Man being called a great heist movie, or even now Wandavision being compared to David Lynch, I roll my eyes more than a little (well I actually don't roll my eyes, I'm not really an eye rolling type of person, but you know what I mean.).

Luke:

I liked Fantastic Mr. Fox, but I'm definitely far from the "best Wes Anderson movie" crowd. I will say though given Anderson's whimsical methods and manner he was ideal for adapting Roald Dahl who loved his whimsical descriptions. We get then a fitting combination of the two, with a lot of Anderson's comedy boosting and propping up the various elements. I think I more than anything just enjoyed the world, more than really the plot, which is from Dahl's book. Not that I disliked any element of the film, but I liked it most when it was just about random stuff in the animal world honestly.

Clooney - 3.5(His voice real is an ideal animated voice with his baritone. That fits for really the sitcom dad almost that Mr. Fox is in some way, and does actual deliver, for me, one of his more charming turns. This in bringing it through his voice to make enough of an endearing quality within Mr. Fox's various hi-jinks.)

Streep - 3(I think her vocal work is entirely respectable, she doesn't really do all that much through the course of the film. A shame in a way, as his vocal abilities is actually one talent of hers I won't at all dispute, for example her Simpsons vocal work is top notch.)

Schwartzman - 3.5(If there's one thing he can do, it is work into silliness, by the way, I took WAY too long to figure it out, but his Fargo role should've played by his cousin, NICOLAS CAGE!!! anyways, I digress severely. Schwartman's voice is well suited and very vibrant here in creating just a properly self-absorbed nerd.)

Dafoe - 3(What's not to enjoy about Dafoe voicing a rat really? I think the snapping his character does was the most enjoyable bit of it.)

Murray - 3(Some Murray dryness is always appreciated particularly as a perpetually annoyed Badger.)

Gambon - 3(Fine sort of villainous vocal work to be sure.)

Anderson - 3(One of those performances where the seeming amateurish qualities to it is what makes it work, as contrast to Schwartman's very distinct work, his is proper kind of ordinary if not even a bit bland in a way that works.)

Well start with just Anderson's direction. Direction that is sort of pure light Anderson direction, and a pure emphasis on kind of aesthetic. This as it doesn't have a hint of the darkness or even strong emotion of his other works. This isn't a criticism really, as the work is purposefully a children style fable, just with some semi-adult comic things thrown in there. In turn then the focus is on that comedy, which is funny as his comedy usually is, and aesthetic, which is properly vibrant as his usually is.

I saw about half of Mulan, didn't really care for what I saw, and really don't have a great desire to finish it off based on that experience.

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: I think the David Lynch thing is ridiculous, especially since that's not what they're going for at all.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Could Bo Burnham go up for Promising Young Woman? Also, do you plan on rewatching the film before giving throughts on the cast.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

*thoughts

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

Probably not, though I'll say he's a firm 4 for me now. I'd only really need to re-watch it for Greenfield and Lowell in terms of giving thoughts, I can tell you why I think Mulligan is brilliant right now.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: could I have your thoughts for Mulligan, Molina, Britton, Mintz-Plasse, Shannon and Brown/Coolidge then?

Matthew Montada said...

Louis: rating and thoughts on Wallace Wolodarksy as Kylie in Fantastic Mr. Fox? I think he is hilarious XD

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Well let me do Mulligan last, as I do not want to not rush that. Though I do have to ask everyone, did anyone else think she was a serial killer from the trailer or was that just me?

Molina - (Well I guess he and Mulligan should team up more, seems to be good for both of them. Molina is great though from the moment you see him in creating the sense of a man just racked by his guilt. This in portraying just the way he looks and speaks to her as all this constant confession. What I love is Molina does it without an overt self pity rather he speaks towards a man who wishes punishment for his crimes. He's distraught but also earnest in every moment showing a man who truly cannot grip what he has done. Molina finding just the broken emotional state, and even finding sympathy for the man who knows he's sinned and wishes to face his judgment for it.)

Britton - (Her performance in contrast to Molina portraying rather someone who is quite assured of their position and self despite previous actions. Her performance emphasizing initially sort of the false sympathy that borders on blithe indifference. This naturally seguing towards a genuine fear, where she presents the right honest horror of the moment that technically implicates the character's dishonesty previously.)

Mintz-Plasse - (The film does well to create a variety of creeps and Mintz-Plasse I felt did his well with a nice balance between comedy and just unpleasantness, even as technically one of the lesser creepers in the scheme of the film. For me his usual styling, tempered here actually a bit, was ideal for the sloppy fool that he is)

Shannon - (Just a nice quick bit of heart from her. Brings the right authenticity to the moment, to grant a sense of the old pleasant relationship and as contrast towards Cassie's vengeful spirit.)

Brown - (Always funny to see him in a warm role, and I thought he delivered on that effectively. I particularly thought he was quite moving in his last scene. This in portraying well a father who doesn't quite understand his daughter but wholly does love her.)

Coolidge - (Thought she bordered a bit on caricature, in a role that just didn't call for it. She's not overly bad or anything, but Brown essentially did what she needed to also do.)

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Mulligan - (I mean I've been a fan of Mulligan since her breakout in 09, but this really is not only a continuation of that promise but also an expansion of it. This performance, again I'll say, because it needs be said. In some qualities Mulligan delivers what should've been in parts of Amazing Amy in Gone Girl. This as she portrays the different personalities with ease that Cassie puts on. This in each of her situations she wholly effectively puts on the needs of any situation to play into becoming the false "prey". Mulligan is terrific in this, particularly in making the "switch" every time all the sharper when it occurs. Her work is absolutely striking in how exact and incisive these moments are. Of course she isn't just the woman who has had too much to drink. This as she's equally striking as the old college friend or the lustful stripper. Mulligan creates each different riff, then pulls out the rug magnificently. Each example of that isn't even the same. I love the way that Mulligan wields the intensity of her performance so marvelously. This in say the first one how blunt it is, or with Mintz-Plasse how more casual and more indirectly dismissive she is. This or with Dean, where she is so directly vicious yet calm and calculated of it, or of course in a final moment where she goes full avenging angel. I love the variety of just that part of her performance. Just that part, because there's all the other scenes of Cassie. This where we have her semi-public personality as the sardonic woman in her initial scenes with Burnham, where Mulligan so wonderfully balances genuine romantic chemistry, with different shades of reservations. One side more dismissive in a comic sense, and hesitations as related to her own trauma and sense of perceived duty. We have this also in the moments with her parents, where Mulligan shows the broken elements of Cassie so affectingly, that never compromises the power of the character. She rather naturally reveals the depth throughout. This particularly in so many moments are in reaction towards unexpected revelation such as in her scene with Molina in particular. Mulligan never simplifies Cassie into a one note revenge seeker, but truly develops that idea both in terms of present intent, past motivation and future conflict. It is outstanding work that I loved every minute of.)

Matthew:

Ahh that's who that was.

Wolodarsky - 3.5(Absolutely hilarious work to be sure, his deliveries just throughout are a hoot with his low key near deadpan worry that plays wonderfully well against Clooney's confidence. They make for an enjoyable and endearing duo, and I particularly like how his delivery doesn't quite give any more clues about what he is thinking when playing possum.)

Calvin Law said...

Louis: I never thought she'd be an outright serial killer but I did get a different vibe from the trailer of what she was setting out to do. I feel like that was a marketing strategy and the film even kind of leads you on with that with the first shot of her during the credits scene with the jam dripping donut. While it's technically marketing misdirection I actually liked it in that It created one set of expectations for the film which is deftly subverted into a far more interesting one.

Calvin Law said...

Love your thoughts on Mulligan by the way, Louis, so spot on about how much depth there is to the role. Which of course, credit to the writing as well, but also credit to Mulligan for nailing every element of it.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I'll agree with the fact that they intentionally gave a different vibe, which unfortunately did lead to a backlash against it from a certain vile part of the Internet.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Burnham and Brie? Also, what did you think of THAT song choice in the ending.

Calvin Law said...

Tahmeed: I'm very interested in hearing those thoughts on those performances and the song, but might be a good idea for them to be prefaced with a SPOILER alert just for people who haven't seen it yet.

Calvin Law said...

As for my thoughts on the song choice, let's just say it made up for It Chapter 2.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: to add onto Tahmeed’s, thoughts on Laverne Cox.

Luke Higham said...

Loved the Mulligan thoughts. :)

Louis: Can I have the rest of your thoughts on Fantastic Mr. Fox. (Screenplay, art direction, score and the two songs that Matthew mentioned)

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Speaking of Mulligan, do you intend on seeing The Dig later this month.

Matthew Brown said...

Louis, I agree completely. Incredible work from Mulligan.

Do you think she may have a chance of winning it this year. I'd say she's a lock for a nomination too.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

The Screenplay manages what is the challenge of adapting Dahl, which again he's less conferenced with plot, and is more interested in long descriptions and telling of little "bits" more than a truly cohesive plot. Baumbach and Anderson's screenplay manages to include both really that spirit and their own spirit in the mix of the two. This as it really is the general plot outline, though beefed up a bit with the son plot, and the series of Andersonisms. These Andersonisms really needed to give more to the story, and adds really a large part of the enjoyment of the film. Of course like the book the plot is fairly flimsy when you break it down, but there's enough all around it, particularly in all the funny little character bits to more than makeup for that.

The art direction is of course pure budgeted Anderson. This with the sheer vibrancy of the colors used, and just the warm pastel colors of it all. The world itself being a splendid sort of fairy tale world of detail, again ideal for Dahl. I think also finding just the right sort of combination of character and really ugliness in the designs of the animals, that doesn't go too far in being atypical or cutesy.

Well the score is strictly a Desplat doing Anderson score, which unsurprisingly is very light for Desplat with a real emphasis on the whimsical naturally. This as despite being definitely orchestral at times, the instrumentation choices are all higher pitched, played with lighter tones. This fitting well to create really an overtly pleasant and charming score more than anything. Boggis, Bunce and Beans, for example being relatively simple bit of scales, so charmingly played with the strange mix of instruments. Petey's Song seems pure Anderson with all the nonsense in the combination of Bango, "spring" and completely nonsensical lyrics. Enjoyable in all that silliness however.

And of course I'll see The Dig, after it was well reviewed, hard not to see something with both Fiennes and Mulligan.

Louis Morgan said...

***SPOILER ONLY POST SKIP OVER IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN****

Cox - (Just a good straight forward "supporting" supporting performance.)

Brie - (Does flighty and slightly air headed well. She manages though not to play it on a purely comic note and brings a degree of insidiousness in the dismissive qualities towards Cassie's concerns about the past. She's then though quite effective in portraying just the genuine horror and bitterness of her state in the second meeting.)

Burnham - (Well part of his performance is just as a good low key romantic lead. I think here he effectively managed to use, but not overplay sort of his stand up style energy, something less true for The Big Sick for example. Here he balances it by making that the charm to the character but not overplaying it so he becomes a caricature. He pulls back in the right moments of genuinely speaking to Cassie. Of course then the turn happens, and I'll say I'm glad he does not suddenly switch his performance to a villain. He rather brings the right sort of selfish fear in his reactions and explanations. Then even his sort of worst moment towards her he shows a pettiness, but it brings it naturally of a man, fairly, wounded.)

I'll admit I first wondered if the song has been overused, then I thought well just used well in Deadpool, terribly in It Chapter 2 (like I literally thought there was some error with the sound in the theater when I saw that one), and Fingers came out in 1978. So without out of my mind, though a properly fitting song, that really does hit its mark with the right degree of catharsis.


**************END SPOILERS*******************

Louis Morgan said...

Matthew:

I do think she has a chance of winning if they go ingenue, which they typically do. They just need to kind of "get the okay" from the precursors to do so. Davis right now is supposedly the front runner, something I don't understand in several different ways, but I don't see her on any impeachable position, particularly as the critics are favoring McDormand (rightfully) on the previously winning vet side of the race.

On the "ingenue race" Kirby at the moment seems her biggest competition, and out of the two films, I think Promising Young Woman has a far greater chance at being an overall player than Pieces of a Woman, which helps Mulligan greatly. In fact I could even see the film maybe winning Original Screenplay if the chips fall in the right way.

Luke Higham said...

Matthew: She needs to win both BAFTA (Vs. Kirby) and SAG (Vs. Davis) for an Oscar win to be a sure thing.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your Wes Anderson ranking.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

1. The Grand Budapest Hotel
2. The Royal Tenenbaums
3. The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou
4. Bottle Rocket
5. Isle of Dogs
6. Fantastic Mr. Fox
7. Moonrise Kingdom
8. Rushmore
9. The Darjeeling Limited

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Pleased we both have the same #1.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: Your category placement for Aldis Hodge in Clemency.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Luke: I'll remain cautiously optimistic about Mulligan's chances, I'd be pissed off if she misses out like Gyllenhaal in Nightcrawler. If she had say Saoirse Ronan's (deserved) track record, she'd be a definite shoo-in for a win.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: If I may ask, why do you have The Darjeeling Limited at #9? If I’m not mistaken, you mentioned that Rushmore was your least favorite Wes Anderson film, in Bill Murrays’ review for that film.

Anonymous said...

Louis, what is your rating and thoughts on Jack Nicholson in The King of Marvin Gardens? Also have you rewatched Night Moves with Gene Hackman. I think it's one of his best performances.

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Please note said review was 6 years ago, I am not a robot and my opinion does change. This barely is an example of that however as the two films were always the bottom rung of his work for me, but I'll grant Rushmore as being more cohesive.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Alrighty. Since you've now seen all of his films to date, your top ten directing moments of Andersons'?

Stephen Patterson said...

Louis, what happens if I get a prediction right.

Tim said...

-your 90s cast for Inception
and
-your thoughts on the screenplay and score of Grand Budapest Hotel?

Tim said...

Stephen Patterson you will be allowed to request a performance that he will definitely review in the future then. Choose one that's at least somewhat worth talking about

Mitchell Murray said...

Stephen: And if you don't have a performance in mind, you can always save the request until you do. The worst that can happen is Louis/company are slightly less enthusiastic about the portrayal than you are.

That's precisely what happened when my first winning request was reviewed - Marcel Lures in "Hart's War". I gave him a 4 while Louis gave him a 3.5, which I don't regret in the slightest.

Stephen Patterson said...

Thank you and thanks for the advice Tim and Mitchell.

Calvin Law said...

Luke: he’s on the border but I would consider him supporting, and he would be a 5 in my books.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Thoughts on this deleted scene from the Terminator?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5XWE6Y10sw

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

1. Jaguar Shark - The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou
2. Suicide attempt - The Royal Tenenbaums
3. Jopling chasing Kovacs - The Grand Budapest Hotel
4. Prison escape - The Grand Budapest Hotel
5. Mountain Pass - The Grand Budapest Hotel
6. Monsieur's end - The Grand Budapest Hotel
7. Opening - The Royal Tenenbaums
8. Margot Arrives Late - The Royal Tenenbaums
9. The storm - Moonrise Kingdom
10. Royal with the boys - The Royal Tenenbaums

Tim:

Well The Grand Budapest is truly made on Anderson's direction, as it is kind of the film it seems like he had been building up to in terms of aesthetic and finally achieved it. The screenplay though is certainly wonderfully written as kind of a hodgepodge of European hoping films in terms of mystery, random upheaval and of course a period setting. This though all funneled through the Anderson world essentially, and it is splendid as such. The film is so much in just detailing the world as fashioned by a concierge and his lobby boy. That is the entry way, but where this excels more than say Fox, is an allowance for a bit more pathos. This not just in the written ending for Monsieur H., but also the lonely man we actually see behind it all, with companionship being key. This combined though with also the whole framing of the story as something long past, both in the man's reflection of his adventures, but even an author's reflections of his own remembrance. Of course having said that, it is also just delightful, with particularly winning and clever dialogue throughout, that makes for a most entertaining ride of sorts every step of the way. A pure joy in that regard, and just some of the very best Anderson comedy to be found.

Desplat again does seem a bit of a spiritual match for Anderson in many ways, and once again the score is filled with a decided whimsy. This though with a fitting sort of kind of underlying darkness strangely enough with its at times semi-Zhivagoesque score, though mixed in a way to be more fitting towards an Andersonian style. Kind of a strange idea in some way, that wholly works in supplying a unique energy to the unique film, with its simple though lovely melody and its pseudo-period/place fitting instrumentation choices.

Inception:

Cobb: Bruce Willis
Arthur: Elias Koteas
Ariadne: Emmanuelle Beart
Eames: Russell Crowe
Saito: Ken Takakura
Yusuf: Om Puri
Robert Fischer: Gary Oldman
Mal: Lena Olin
Maurice Fischer: Richard Harris
Professor Miles: Alec Guinness

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

I can see why it was deleted. Although it is interesting to see Cameron setting setting up the sequel, even Sarah's intentions, but the scene is awkward, particularly Kyle pulling the gun on her, and Hamilton's acting is a bit off here.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: Bottom 10 performances of 2020?

Louis Morgan said...

Robert:

1. Owen Asztalos - Hillbilly Elegy
2. Gabriel Basso - Hillbilly Elegy
3. Amy Adams - Hillbilly Elegy
4. Glenn Close - Hillbilly Elegy
5. Ella Jay Basco - Birds of Prey
6. Jeremy Strong - The Gentlemen
7. Lesley Manville - Let Him Go
8. Michael Covino - News of the World
9. Armie Hammer - Rebecca
10. Henry Golding - The Gentlemen

Luke Higham said...

I won't be able to get it out of my mind seeing Lesley Manville on a Bottom 10 list.

Louis Morgan said...

Well she should've really let Melissa Leo play the part, rather than play it like Melissa Leo.

Razor said...

Louis: Hammer and Golding still 2’s?

Louis Morgan said...

Razor:

I'd bump them both down to 1.5's, though I do hope there's a silver lining with Hammer's that it will help people see just how brilliant Olivier was in the role.