5. Raj Kapoor in Awaara - Despite the somewhat disjointed nature of what
is required of him, Kapoor actually matches well any tone or style is
requested of him by himself as director.
Best Scene: Raj catches the "thief".
4. Richard Basehart in Fourteen Hours - Basehart keeps most of his more
theatrical tendencies under control to an effective portrayal of the
intense state of mind on the edge both literally and metaphorically.
Best Scene: Robert speaks with Dunnigan about the good things in life.
3. Oskar Werner in Decision Before Dawn - Werner effectively elevates his film through his moving and nuanced portrayal of a righteous traitor.
Best Scene: Happy argues for the deserter.
2. Trevor Howard in Outcast of the Islands - Howard gives a downright brilliant portrayal of man who only becomes worse after being given a chance for redemption.
Best Scene: Madness in the rain.
1. Michael Redgrave in The Browning Version - Good prediction Tahmeed. I have to admit the choice for the final overall was relatively easy despite my love for the performances of Marlon Brando, Montgomery Clift, Alec Guinness, Robert Walker, Trevor Howard and Alistair Sim from 1951. I thought Redgrave was a good actor before watching this film, but his extraordinary work here put him in even greater light for me. It is such precise yet naturalistic, uncompromising yet heartfelt, complex and poignant depiction of a man who has slowly given up on life.
Best Scene: The speech.
Updated Overall Lead
Updated Overall Supporting
Next Year: 1993 Lead
Showing posts with label Oskar Werner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oskar Werner. Show all posts
Sunday, 18 December 2016
Friday, 9 December 2016
Alternate Best Actor 1951: Oskar Werner in Decision Before Dawn
Oskar Werner did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Corporal Karl Maurer aka Happy in Decision Before Dawn.
Decision Before Dawn about a German being made a spy for the allies takes a little too long on its setup but is a decent thriller once it focuses on that character.
Oskar Werner plays the eventual lead of the film as Happy, who we first see as a German medic and POW but later becomes a spy for the Allies. The film takes a bit of time as it illustrates the plot by spending time with the Americans, planning the mission and setting up another German spy, who has the most predictable character arc one could imagine. The film eventually finds its way to focusing on Happy, who happens to also be played by the best actor in the film. Werner even kind of steals the film before he even gains the stronger focus as he proves his ability onscreen, just through his eyes as he is able to express the quiet outrage in Happy as he decides to work against his home country, in part due to seeing his fellow soldiers despicable behavior even while detained. Thankfully the film restricts its focus upon Happy sooner than later, and we are given one of Werner's first English language performances. Now he might not be as assured as his work in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, but that's a tall order to fulfill.
Werner once again has this real low key charm about him, and he immediately endearing in his portrayal of Happy. He importantly doesn't even need to try, there is just an innate honesty Werner brings to his performance, which is interesting given that he technically playing a traitor. Werner though brings basically home the message of the good traitor in his performance by bringing this effortless goodness that he exudes as Happy. This is also essential in that it makes it particularly easy to invest in Werner as Happy is sent back into his home country in order to discover an important bit of information. Werner actually has a particularly difficult challenge in that he really doesn't have anyone to work against in terms of portraying the man's on the mission, since Happy does not meet up with his liasons until near the film's ending. The rest of the time it is solely upon Werner to realize the struggle in Happy as he goes about his mission. Werner succeeds in this as he creates the sense of the underlying fear in Happy throughout the scenes, but does even more than that.
Werner gives further understanding of Happy through very nuanced indirect reactions within other interactions. For example there is great moment where Happy learns that his father is nearby, and Werner is able to express the concern in Happy for him while still keeping the shell of a soldier just going about his duty. There is so much dependent on Werner to capture so much of the emotional weight of the story. Werner never is lacking in this though and adds so much substance to the side relationships Happy strikes up while on his mission. This includes two "lowly" sorts one a woman few others care about and an affable fellow soldier. In both Werner presents such a palatable empathy in Happy and in turn makes those character more meaningful than they would have been otherwise. Werner is especially moving in a scene where he tries to passionate save someone from death. This all while Werner never loses the struggle of the mission in his very being. He keeps that pivotal central tension but finds the right amount of substance that benefits the film greatly. Eventually the film ends on a straight escape scene where technically some of that substance found earlier seems lost. Werner though proves his worth one last time though in the escape when Happy sacrifices himself for the sake of the mission. Werner has made Happy such a likable character that when this happens it is rather heartbreaking, even if the film itself still doesn't seem like it quite is appreciating what Werner is doing for it. It's performance which elevates the film, and though it might not be as assured as his later work, it is a strong early indication of Werner's talent.
Decision Before Dawn about a German being made a spy for the allies takes a little too long on its setup but is a decent thriller once it focuses on that character.
Oskar Werner plays the eventual lead of the film as Happy, who we first see as a German medic and POW but later becomes a spy for the Allies. The film takes a bit of time as it illustrates the plot by spending time with the Americans, planning the mission and setting up another German spy, who has the most predictable character arc one could imagine. The film eventually finds its way to focusing on Happy, who happens to also be played by the best actor in the film. Werner even kind of steals the film before he even gains the stronger focus as he proves his ability onscreen, just through his eyes as he is able to express the quiet outrage in Happy as he decides to work against his home country, in part due to seeing his fellow soldiers despicable behavior even while detained. Thankfully the film restricts its focus upon Happy sooner than later, and we are given one of Werner's first English language performances. Now he might not be as assured as his work in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, but that's a tall order to fulfill.
Werner once again has this real low key charm about him, and he immediately endearing in his portrayal of Happy. He importantly doesn't even need to try, there is just an innate honesty Werner brings to his performance, which is interesting given that he technically playing a traitor. Werner though brings basically home the message of the good traitor in his performance by bringing this effortless goodness that he exudes as Happy. This is also essential in that it makes it particularly easy to invest in Werner as Happy is sent back into his home country in order to discover an important bit of information. Werner actually has a particularly difficult challenge in that he really doesn't have anyone to work against in terms of portraying the man's on the mission, since Happy does not meet up with his liasons until near the film's ending. The rest of the time it is solely upon Werner to realize the struggle in Happy as he goes about his mission. Werner succeeds in this as he creates the sense of the underlying fear in Happy throughout the scenes, but does even more than that.
Werner gives further understanding of Happy through very nuanced indirect reactions within other interactions. For example there is great moment where Happy learns that his father is nearby, and Werner is able to express the concern in Happy for him while still keeping the shell of a soldier just going about his duty. There is so much dependent on Werner to capture so much of the emotional weight of the story. Werner never is lacking in this though and adds so much substance to the side relationships Happy strikes up while on his mission. This includes two "lowly" sorts one a woman few others care about and an affable fellow soldier. In both Werner presents such a palatable empathy in Happy and in turn makes those character more meaningful than they would have been otherwise. Werner is especially moving in a scene where he tries to passionate save someone from death. This all while Werner never loses the struggle of the mission in his very being. He keeps that pivotal central tension but finds the right amount of substance that benefits the film greatly. Eventually the film ends on a straight escape scene where technically some of that substance found earlier seems lost. Werner though proves his worth one last time though in the escape when Happy sacrifices himself for the sake of the mission. Werner has made Happy such a likable character that when this happens it is rather heartbreaking, even if the film itself still doesn't seem like it quite is appreciating what Werner is doing for it. It's performance which elevates the film, and though it might not be as assured as his later work, it is a strong early indication of Werner's talent.
Monday, 5 December 2016
Alternate Best Actor 1951
And the Nominees Were Not:
Raj Kapoor in Awaara
Oskar Werner in Decision Before Dawn
Trevor Howard in Outcast of the Islands
Michael Redgrave in The Browning Version
Richard Basehart in Fourteen Hours
Raj Kapoor in Awaara
Oskar Werner in Decision Before Dawn
Trevor Howard in Outcast of the Islands
Michael Redgrave in The Browning Version
Richard Basehart in Fourteen Hours
Sunday, 10 January 2016
Alternate Best Actor 1962: Results
10. Oskar Werner in Jules and Jim - Werner's role is limited yet his unassuming charm manages to keep himself from being overshadowed despite the film's apparent desire otherwise.
Best Scene: Jules talks about Catherine's True Nature.
9. Montgomery Clift in Freud - Clift manages to create a compelling portrait of Freud not through mannerisms, but rather finding the emotional core within the man's motivations.
Best Scene: Freud finding the truth behind Cecily's mental trauma.
8. Laurence Harvey in The Manchurian Candidate - Harvey portrays well the cold calculated man turned into a cold killer, but also manages to be extremely moving in portraying the vulnerabilities of the man.
Best Scene: The Assassination
7. Patrick McGoohan in in All Night Long - McGoohan gives a fascinating portrayal of an Iago like drummer, whose greatest joy comes from the torment of others.
Best Scene: Johnnie "accidentally" spills secrets to Rex.
6. Toshiro Mifune in Sanjuro - Mifune gives a great reprise of his role in Yojimbo, by slanting towards comedy and succeeding quite thoroughly in this regard.
Best Scene: The samurai observes the rescued women.
5. Tom Courtenay in The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner - I'll say right now that I had a great difficulty ranking these five, and found it even more impossible when having to include Peck, Wayne and Lemmon. These are all exceptional performances starting with Courtenay's intense yet heart wrenching depiction of young man lashing out due to his hatred of authority but also from his own fear.
Best Scene: The Beach.
4. James Stewart in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance - Stewart gives one of his best performances as both a young man passionately fighting for what is right, as well as an older man forcing to live with the lie that made his life.
Best Scene: The Senator finishes the story.
3. Robert Mitchum in Cape Fear - Mitchum creates one of the all time great cinematic villains, not through the depiction of a mastermind, but rather a violent creep who's completely content with his actions.
Best Scene: Cady's mentions his wife.
2. Tatsuya Nakadai in Harakiri - Nakadai gives an outstanding performance as he realizes not only an otherworldly spirit of righteous vengeance, but also the man who became it.
Best Scene: Hanshiro Tsugumo finishes his story.
1. James Mason in Lolita - Good Predictions JackiBoyz, RatedRStar. Mason gives an outstanding performance as he manages to balance everything in the film. He's the perfect straight man for Sellers's comedy, he manages to make Humbert far more sympathetic than should be possible, while giving an absolutely mesmerizing depiction of man being destroyed mentally and physically by his unhealthy obsession.
Best Scene: Humbert confronts Quilty.
Overall Rank:
Best Scene: Jules talks about Catherine's True Nature.
9. Montgomery Clift in Freud - Clift manages to create a compelling portrait of Freud not through mannerisms, but rather finding the emotional core within the man's motivations.
Best Scene: Freud finding the truth behind Cecily's mental trauma.
8. Laurence Harvey in The Manchurian Candidate - Harvey portrays well the cold calculated man turned into a cold killer, but also manages to be extremely moving in portraying the vulnerabilities of the man.
Best Scene: The Assassination
7. Patrick McGoohan in in All Night Long - McGoohan gives a fascinating portrayal of an Iago like drummer, whose greatest joy comes from the torment of others.
Best Scene: Johnnie "accidentally" spills secrets to Rex.
6. Toshiro Mifune in Sanjuro - Mifune gives a great reprise of his role in Yojimbo, by slanting towards comedy and succeeding quite thoroughly in this regard.
Best Scene: The samurai observes the rescued women.
5. Tom Courtenay in The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner - I'll say right now that I had a great difficulty ranking these five, and found it even more impossible when having to include Peck, Wayne and Lemmon. These are all exceptional performances starting with Courtenay's intense yet heart wrenching depiction of young man lashing out due to his hatred of authority but also from his own fear.
Best Scene: The Beach.
4. James Stewart in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance - Stewart gives one of his best performances as both a young man passionately fighting for what is right, as well as an older man forcing to live with the lie that made his life.
Best Scene: The Senator finishes the story.
3. Robert Mitchum in Cape Fear - Mitchum creates one of the all time great cinematic villains, not through the depiction of a mastermind, but rather a violent creep who's completely content with his actions.
Best Scene: Cady's mentions his wife.
2. Tatsuya Nakadai in Harakiri - Nakadai gives an outstanding performance as he realizes not only an otherworldly spirit of righteous vengeance, but also the man who became it.
Best Scene: Hanshiro Tsugumo finishes his story.
1. James Mason in Lolita - Good Predictions JackiBoyz, RatedRStar. Mason gives an outstanding performance as he manages to balance everything in the film. He's the perfect straight man for Sellers's comedy, he manages to make Humbert far more sympathetic than should be possible, while giving an absolutely mesmerizing depiction of man being destroyed mentally and physically by his unhealthy obsession.
Best Scene: Humbert confronts Quilty.
Overall Rank:
- Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia
- James Mason in Lolita
- Tatsuya Nakadai in Harakiri
- Jack Lemmon in The Days of Wine and Roses
- Robert Mitchum in Cape Fear
- Gregory Peck in To Kill a Mockingbird
- James Stewart in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
- Tom Courtenay in The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner
- John Wayne in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
- Terence Stamp in Billy Budd
- Toshiro Mifune in Sanjuro
- Patrick McGoohan in All Night Long
- Laurence Harvey in The Manchurian Candidate
- Frank Sinatra in The Manchurian Candidate
- Trevor Howard in Mutiny on the Bounty
- Richard Attenborough in Trial and Error
- Phillip Alford in To Kill a Mockingbird
- Montgomery Clift in Freud
- Sean Connery in Dr. No
- Paul Newman in Sweet Bird of Youth
- Peter Ustinov in Billy Budd
- Gregory Peck in Cape Fear
- Oskar Werner in Jules and Jim
- Peter Sellers in Trial and Error
- Robert Preston in The Music Man
- Paul Harris in All Night Long
- Burt Lancaster in Birdman of Alcatraz
- Henri Serre in Jules and Jim
- Marlon Brando in Mutiny on the Bounty
Alternate Best Actor 1962: Oskar Werner in Jules and Jim
Oskar Werner did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Jules in Jules and Jim.
Jules and Jim tells the story of the long lasting love triangle involving two friends and a very impetuous woman Catherine (Jeanne Moreau).
Jules and Jim is directed with a certain dreamy quality by Francois Truffaut. The music is always has this certain ease, as does the cinematography, and even the narration has this certain calm to it. There is a lightness kept to the story that stays even when one break in the story is a war. The earliest scenes of the film are shown all as some romantic vacation of sorts as Jules, and his friend Jim (Henri Serre) seems to live a life of such ease. This section in particular more of depicts images of the friendship between Jules and Jim, as well as Jules romance with Catherine, rather than detailed interactions between the two. Werner's performance is very much limited, though he is effective in depicting a certain spontaneous joy as we see him randomly live his life with Jim, and Catherine. Werner's work, like the film itself at this point, is purposefully breezy. as Werner quite plainly portrays a man enjoying life. This eventually ends on Jules marrying Catherine, and with that the film makes its first shift with both Jules and Jim entering into World War I.
World War I is only shown to be a brief distraction in terms of the story. The tone changes slightly, it still retains the same style, but Jules, Jim and Catherine all seem to slow down a bit. Jules's letter to Catherine is the moment of change for Werner's performance as he becomes far more restrained and frankly less enthusiastic in his performance. Werner is indeed quite effective in realizes the wear of the war, and the changed caused by just through his performance as there is clearly less joy in Jules, as he writes the letter to his wife. This continues as the story does as even after the war it becomes clear that Catherine's nature will cause her to ignore him, and in this case in favor of his friend Jim, even though the two have already had children. Julies, even though Catherine is leaving him, does not react as a jilted lover, and instead Werner depicts Jules as very much resigned in this fate. Werner, making use of that earlier scene during the war, actually makes this a fairly natural transition, and allows Jules's nonchalance towards Catherine's pursuit of Him, believable.
Werner carries the right sort of melancholy quality to Jules in any scene in which he discusses Catherine with Jim, as Werner echoes a certain despair, but as much depicts a sad understanding of exactly the woman she is. This leaves Jules in a strange spot, as well as Werner in a rather difficult place within the film as well. Jules actually becomes quite static for basically the second half of the film, as Jules must merely observe Jim and Catherine's behavior, while only really staying around because he's the father of Catherine's children. To Werner's credit though he actually isn't overshadowed, despite the story forcing him into such a position. Werner manages to get by through extremely low key charm, and just as well keeping a consistent honesty in his portrayal of Jules as he just keeps to himself while Jim and Catherine live out their problematic affair. Though Jules is often ignored as that affair becomes more intense, the final moments of the film end up from Jules's perspective. Even in this it is somewhat limited, though Werner's silent final moments are fairly moving as he reflects Jules's loss, as Jules once again remains the odd one out. Werner gives a good performance as his withdrawn yet engaging screen presence keeps Jules from being forgotten even when the film seems to have forgotten about him.
Jules and Jim tells the story of the long lasting love triangle involving two friends and a very impetuous woman Catherine (Jeanne Moreau).
Jules and Jim is directed with a certain dreamy quality by Francois Truffaut. The music is always has this certain ease, as does the cinematography, and even the narration has this certain calm to it. There is a lightness kept to the story that stays even when one break in the story is a war. The earliest scenes of the film are shown all as some romantic vacation of sorts as Jules, and his friend Jim (Henri Serre) seems to live a life of such ease. This section in particular more of depicts images of the friendship between Jules and Jim, as well as Jules romance with Catherine, rather than detailed interactions between the two. Werner's performance is very much limited, though he is effective in depicting a certain spontaneous joy as we see him randomly live his life with Jim, and Catherine. Werner's work, like the film itself at this point, is purposefully breezy. as Werner quite plainly portrays a man enjoying life. This eventually ends on Jules marrying Catherine, and with that the film makes its first shift with both Jules and Jim entering into World War I.
World War I is only shown to be a brief distraction in terms of the story. The tone changes slightly, it still retains the same style, but Jules, Jim and Catherine all seem to slow down a bit. Jules's letter to Catherine is the moment of change for Werner's performance as he becomes far more restrained and frankly less enthusiastic in his performance. Werner is indeed quite effective in realizes the wear of the war, and the changed caused by just through his performance as there is clearly less joy in Jules, as he writes the letter to his wife. This continues as the story does as even after the war it becomes clear that Catherine's nature will cause her to ignore him, and in this case in favor of his friend Jim, even though the two have already had children. Julies, even though Catherine is leaving him, does not react as a jilted lover, and instead Werner depicts Jules as very much resigned in this fate. Werner, making use of that earlier scene during the war, actually makes this a fairly natural transition, and allows Jules's nonchalance towards Catherine's pursuit of Him, believable.
Werner carries the right sort of melancholy quality to Jules in any scene in which he discusses Catherine with Jim, as Werner echoes a certain despair, but as much depicts a sad understanding of exactly the woman she is. This leaves Jules in a strange spot, as well as Werner in a rather difficult place within the film as well. Jules actually becomes quite static for basically the second half of the film, as Jules must merely observe Jim and Catherine's behavior, while only really staying around because he's the father of Catherine's children. To Werner's credit though he actually isn't overshadowed, despite the story forcing him into such a position. Werner manages to get by through extremely low key charm, and just as well keeping a consistent honesty in his portrayal of Jules as he just keeps to himself while Jim and Catherine live out their problematic affair. Though Jules is often ignored as that affair becomes more intense, the final moments of the film end up from Jules's perspective. Even in this it is somewhat limited, though Werner's silent final moments are fairly moving as he reflects Jules's loss, as Jules once again remains the odd one out. Werner gives a good performance as his withdrawn yet engaging screen presence keeps Jules from being forgotten even when the film seems to have forgotten about him.
Saturday, 21 November 2015
Alternate Best Actor 1962
And the Nominees Were Not:
James Mason in Lolita
Toshiro Mifune in Sanjuro
Montgomery Clift in Freud
Robert Mitchum in Cape Fear
Tom Courtenay in The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner
Rank Those Five or These Five:
James Stewart in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
Tatsuya Nakadai in Harakiri
Laurence Harvey in The Manchurian Candidate
Oskar Werner in Jules and Jim
Patrick McGoohan in All Night Long
Or both.
James Mason in Lolita
Toshiro Mifune in Sanjuro
Montgomery Clift in Freud
Robert Mitchum in Cape Fear
Tom Courtenay in The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner
Rank Those Five or These Five:
James Stewart in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
Tatsuya Nakadai in Harakiri
Laurence Harvey in The Manchurian Candidate
Oskar Werner in Jules and Jim
Patrick McGoohan in All Night Long
Or both.
Wednesday, 7 January 2015
Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1965: Results
6. Ian Bannen in The Hill - Well this was in no way a pleasure to even place the seventh spot in my ranking since I love all of these performances. Bannen merely gives another great performance of one man's own clever ways of survival as military prison guard while never losing his frustrations underneath.
Best Scene: The final confrontation.
5. Ian Hendry in The Hill - Hendry is also great in his uncompromising depiction of his character's sadism. What makes him standout though are the very human weaknesses he also brings to the character particularly in his portrayal of his character's attempt to be the proper military man.
Best Scene: The final confrontation as well.
4. Oskar Werner in A Spy Who Came In From The Cold - Werner actually does not have too much material but has to make a whole lot of it. Well he does so giving so much life and genuine passion to his character Fiedler that he makes it heartbreaking when it turns out that Fielder has been used all along.
Best Scene: Fiedler realizes he's been had.
3. Toshiro Mifune in Red Beard - The last great performance to be found from the collaboration between Akira Kurosawa and Toshiro Mifune. Mifune takes a rather unorthodox somewhat colder approach with the character of the wise mentor but succeeds wholly in earning the palatable emotions of every scene he is in, and effortlessly becoming a personification of compassion.
Best Scene: Red Beard goes to retrieve the patient from the Brothel.
2. Rod Steiger in Doctor Zhivago - Steiger has a great character and brilliantly realizes his complexity. He's a perfect smiling devil yet Steiger importantly shows that there still a bit of humanity to be found.
Best Scene: Komoravosky tells Zhivago what happened to Pasha.
1. Harry Andrews in The Hill - Andrews gives an outstanding performance as he carefully differs himself from the other two men playing guards by showing a man utterly devoted to the mindset of the military. Andrews never allows himself to be one note though using every moment to fully realize his character as man who tries to conduct things as a machine. It's hard enough ranking these six but becomes even harder having to consider Tom Courtenay's work in Doctor Zhivago as well, which only improved all the more on re-watch. I really hate to have to leave the Ians out of the top five. Now I do feel I could give any one of these men the win and they would be more than deserving. My choice goes to Courtenay as it's a performance that only gets better the more I think about it, plus if I want to cheat in my reasoning he was also great in King Rat.
Best Scene: Wilson deals with the potential riot.
- Tom Courtenay in Doctor Zhivago
- Harry Andrews in The Hill
- Robert Shaw in Battle of the Bulge
- Rod Steiger in Doctor Zhivago
- Richard Harris in Major Dundee
- Toshiro Mifune in Red Beard
- Oskar Werner in The Spy Who Came in From The Cold
- Ian Hendry in The Hill
- Ian Bannen in The Hill
- Tsutomu Yamazaki in Red Beard
- Ossie Davis in The Hill
- Gian Maria Volonté in For A Few Dollars More
- Charlton Heston in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Claude Rains in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Donald Pleasence in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Tom Courtenay in King Rat
- Roy Kinnear in The Hill
- Cyril Cusack in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold
- Michael Redgrave in The Hill
- Junzaburō Ban in A Fugitive From the Past
- Tom Courtenay in Operation Crossbow
- John Gielgud in Chimes at Midnight
- Hans Christian Blech in Battle of the Bulge
- James Mason in Lord Jim
- Edward G. Robinson in The Cincinnati Kid
- Trevor Howard in Von Ryan's Express
- Klaus Kinski in Doctor Zhivago
- Noel Coward in Bunny Lake is Missing
- Telly Savalas in Battle of the Bulge
- Alec Guinness in Doctor Zhivago
- Leo McKern in Help!
- Nigel Green in The Ipcress File
- Richard Attenborough in The Flight of the Phoenix
- Jack Watson in The Hill
- Terry Thomas in Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines
- Roy Kinnear in Help!
- Peter van Eyck in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold
- Warren Oates in Major Dundee
- Burgess Meredith in In Harm's Way
- Hardy Kruger in The Flight of the Phoenix
- Alfred Lynch in The Hill
- Charles Bronson in Battle of the Bulge
- Van Heflin in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- James Coburn in Major Dundee
- Dean Martin in The Sons of Katie Elder
- Eijiro Tono in Samurai Assassin
- Alberto Sordi in Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines
- Wallace Ford in A Patch of Blue
- Richard Harris in The Heroes of Telemark
- Christopher Lee in in Dr. Terror's House of Horrors
- Jose Ferrer in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Michael Hordern in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold
- Anthony Quayle in Operation Crossbow
- Ralph Richardson in Doctor Zhivago
- Peter Sellers in What's New Pussycat?
- Eli Wallach in Lord Jim
- Dirk Bogarde in Darling
- Keenan Wynn in The Great Race
- Ronald Fraser in The Flight of the Phoenix
- Victor Spinetti in Help!
- Peter Falk in The Great Race
- Sergio Fantoni in Von Ryan's Express
- Geoffrey Keen in Doctor Zhivago
- Vladimir Mensik in Loves a Blonde
- Woody Allen in What's New Pussycat?
- Michael Craig in Sandra
- Karl Malden in The Cincinnati Kid
- Denholm Elliot in King Rat
- Michael Redgrave in The Heroes of Telemark
- Robert Morley in Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines
- James Donald in King Rat
- Ken Takakura in A Fugitive From the Past
- David McCallum in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Peter Finch in The Flight of the Phoenix
- Patrick Cargill in Help!
- John Mills in King Rat
- Jean-Claude Brialy in I Knew Her Well
- Marino Mase in Fists in the Pocket
- Sal Mineo in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Patrick Wymark in Repulsion
- Jack Weston in The Cincinnati Kid
- Joseph Schildkraut in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Paul Lukas in Lord Jim
- Arthur O'Connell in The Great Race
- Telly Savalas in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Norman Bird in The Hill
- Ben Johnson in Major Dundee
- Donald Sutherland in Dr. Terror's House of Horrors
- Ed Wynn in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Jaime Sanchez in The Pawnbroker
- Klaus Kinski in For A Few Dollars More
- Bernard Lee in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold
- Derek Jacobi in Othello
- Ernest Borgnine in The Flight of the Phoenix
- Richard Haydn in The Sound of Music
- Mario Adorf in I Knew Her Well
- Williams Daniels in A Thousand Clowns
- Mario Brega in For A Few Dollars More
- Brandon De Wilde in In Harm's Way
- Henry Fonda in Battle of the Bulge
- Dennis Hopper in The Sons of Katie Elder
- Michael Gough in Dr. Terror's House of Horrors
- Desmond Llewelyn in Thunderball
- Jeremy Kemp in Operation Crossbow
- Finlay Currie in Bunny Lake is Missing
- Peter Cushing in Dr. Terror's House of Horrors
- Laurence Harvey in Darling
- Trevor Howard in Operation Crossbow
- Robert Ryan in Battle of the Bulge
- Guy Doleman in The Ipcress File
- Dana Andrews in Battle of the Bulge
- Jim Hutton in Major Dundee
- Kirk Douglas in In Harm's Way
- Harry Andrews in The Agony and the Ecstasy
- Christopher Plummer in Inside Daisy Clover
- Adolfi Celi in Thunderball
- Gene Saks in A Thousand Clowns
- James Gregory in The Sons of Katie Elder
- Tom Tryon in In Harm's Way
- James Fox in Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines
- Bernard Lee in Thunderball
- Rip Torn in The Cincinnati Kid
- Hardy Kruger in Lord Jim
- Maurice Dallimore in The Collector
- Martin Landau in The Greatest Story Ever Told
- Charles Bronson in The Sandpiper
- Michael Anderson Jr. in Major Dundee
- Martin Balsam in A Thousand Clowns
- Michael Dunn in Ship of Fools
- George Segal in Ship of Fools
- Robert Redford in Inside Daisy Clover
- Lee Marvin in Ship of Fools
- Ian Bannen in Flight of the Phoenix
- Brock Peters in The Pawnbroker
- José Ferrer in Ship of Fools
- Barry Gordon in A Thousand Clowns
Thursday, 1 January 2015
Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1965: Oskar Werner in The Spy Who Came in From The Cold
Oskar Werner did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning the Golden Globe and being nominated for BAFTA, for portraying Fiedler in The Spy Who Came in From The Cold.
Oskar Werner started an unfortunate three year trend of actors winning the Golden Globe for best supporting actor but not even being nominated for an Oscar. Naturally the Academy had to ignore Oskar Werner and Richard Attenborough, but made sure they recognized Daniel Massey's breathtaking work in Star!. In all seriousness though there was an odd bit of thinking where Supporting Actor was considered lesser actor evidenced by some controversy at Montgomery Clift and Judy Garland's Oscar nominations for Judgment At Nuremberg where it was considered below a star to be nominated for supporting. That ridiculously foolish thinking is perhaps why Werner and Rod Steiger could not be double nominated, and if you look there is long period of time where no one was double nominated. That is unfortunate since Werner although was deserving for his work in Ship of Fools, there is no reason that should have made him be ignored for his work as Fiedler in this film.
Fiedler is an east German intelligence agent who interrogates the falsely disgruntled British agent Alec Leamas (Richard Burton). It's a technically friendly interrogation as Leamas has been made out to be a fake traitor to give Fiedler misinformation to take down his superior Mundt as a British agent. Werner seems to have a simple enough role as Fiedler begins to derive his information from Leamas. What Werner does so well is give a great deal of life to Fiedler through the margins. Werner conducts himself brilliantly in these scenes doing so much through the smallest moment. For example when Leamas mentions Mundt was a former Nazi to the Jewish Fielder, Werner's reaction is pure perfection. He reacts as a man with this knowledge already but there is a discontent within in this even though he feigns not caring not to lead on to Leamas that he has a problem with Mundt. It's a great piece of acting by Werner but every second of his scenes with Burton are great as he gives so much character to Fiedler in every little reaction he makes.
There is such a likability that Werner brings as he goes through the questions as Werner presents Fiedler to be essentially an honest man in a profession entirely made up of dishonest people. Werner shows a man who is actually genuine as he tries to deal with Leamas in a respectful way even though Werner still conveys the proper intrigue and intelligence as Fielder slowly deciphers the information. It an interesting trick Werner pulls here as Fiedler could have just been there to be a plot point, but Werner does so much more than that in this scene. His performance stands separately from almost every other performance in the film because Werner presents a man who says who he is. There are things he covers up for sure such as his dislike for Mundt, but Werner portrays this as something he has to do rather than something he truly wants to do. Werner does such a fantastic job of establishing Fiedler, and even creating a sympathy for the man that he makes his final scene something truly special.
The last scene is a trial in front of a East German tribunal where Fielder presents the information, false information he got from Leamas, to incriminate Mundt as a traitor. Werner is outstanding as Fiedler gives his case to the court as he brings so much passion in his pleading to the courts to sentence Mundt for having betrayed the cause. It's fascinating what Werner does in that he shows us the only true believer, which happens to be the enemy cause, but it's hard not to feel for him because Werner presents Fielder's as true to that cause, unlike every other man we see in the spy game. The only moment that trumps the power of that scene though is when the court learns of the British plot to set up Mundt revealing that they were only using Fiedler. Werner is heartbreaking as he shows the utter disbelief and shock as the truth comes out. In Werner's face you can see a man who knows he's suddenly just lost his life. This is marvelous work from Werner as he does something really quite interesting that was absolutely up to the performance. Fiedler is the whole target of the spy trick set up by British Intelligence, but when it is executed it is not a pleasant feeling elicited. Werner's performance creates the brutality of the espionage because he so wonderfully humanizes this enemy, and presented a tragic man who doomed himself by only doing what he thought was right.
Oskar Werner started an unfortunate three year trend of actors winning the Golden Globe for best supporting actor but not even being nominated for an Oscar. Naturally the Academy had to ignore Oskar Werner and Richard Attenborough, but made sure they recognized Daniel Massey's breathtaking work in Star!. In all seriousness though there was an odd bit of thinking where Supporting Actor was considered lesser actor evidenced by some controversy at Montgomery Clift and Judy Garland's Oscar nominations for Judgment At Nuremberg where it was considered below a star to be nominated for supporting. That ridiculously foolish thinking is perhaps why Werner and Rod Steiger could not be double nominated, and if you look there is long period of time where no one was double nominated. That is unfortunate since Werner although was deserving for his work in Ship of Fools, there is no reason that should have made him be ignored for his work as Fiedler in this film.
Fiedler is an east German intelligence agent who interrogates the falsely disgruntled British agent Alec Leamas (Richard Burton). It's a technically friendly interrogation as Leamas has been made out to be a fake traitor to give Fiedler misinformation to take down his superior Mundt as a British agent. Werner seems to have a simple enough role as Fiedler begins to derive his information from Leamas. What Werner does so well is give a great deal of life to Fiedler through the margins. Werner conducts himself brilliantly in these scenes doing so much through the smallest moment. For example when Leamas mentions Mundt was a former Nazi to the Jewish Fielder, Werner's reaction is pure perfection. He reacts as a man with this knowledge already but there is a discontent within in this even though he feigns not caring not to lead on to Leamas that he has a problem with Mundt. It's a great piece of acting by Werner but every second of his scenes with Burton are great as he gives so much character to Fiedler in every little reaction he makes.
There is such a likability that Werner brings as he goes through the questions as Werner presents Fiedler to be essentially an honest man in a profession entirely made up of dishonest people. Werner shows a man who is actually genuine as he tries to deal with Leamas in a respectful way even though Werner still conveys the proper intrigue and intelligence as Fielder slowly deciphers the information. It an interesting trick Werner pulls here as Fiedler could have just been there to be a plot point, but Werner does so much more than that in this scene. His performance stands separately from almost every other performance in the film because Werner presents a man who says who he is. There are things he covers up for sure such as his dislike for Mundt, but Werner portrays this as something he has to do rather than something he truly wants to do. Werner does such a fantastic job of establishing Fiedler, and even creating a sympathy for the man that he makes his final scene something truly special.
The last scene is a trial in front of a East German tribunal where Fielder presents the information, false information he got from Leamas, to incriminate Mundt as a traitor. Werner is outstanding as Fiedler gives his case to the court as he brings so much passion in his pleading to the courts to sentence Mundt for having betrayed the cause. It's fascinating what Werner does in that he shows us the only true believer, which happens to be the enemy cause, but it's hard not to feel for him because Werner presents Fielder's as true to that cause, unlike every other man we see in the spy game. The only moment that trumps the power of that scene though is when the court learns of the British plot to set up Mundt revealing that they were only using Fiedler. Werner is heartbreaking as he shows the utter disbelief and shock as the truth comes out. In Werner's face you can see a man who knows he's suddenly just lost his life. This is marvelous work from Werner as he does something really quite interesting that was absolutely up to the performance. Fiedler is the whole target of the spy trick set up by British Intelligence, but when it is executed it is not a pleasant feeling elicited. Werner's performance creates the brutality of the espionage because he so wonderfully humanizes this enemy, and presented a tragic man who doomed himself by only doing what he thought was right.
Wednesday, 31 December 2014
Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1965
And the Nominees Were Not:
Toshiro Mifune in Red Beard
Rod Steiger in Doctor Zhivago
Ian Bannen in The Hill
Harry Andrews in The Hill
Ian Hendry in The Hill
Oskar Werner in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold
Jack Lemmon in The Great Race
For the Prediction Contest the Honor goes to:
Andrews
Toshiro Mifune in Red Beard
Rod Steiger in Doctor Zhivago
Ian Bannen in The Hill
Harry Andrews in The Hill
Ian Hendry in The Hill
Oskar Werner in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold
Jack Lemmon in The Great Race
For the Prediction Contest the Honor goes to:
Andrews
Wednesday, 11 September 2013
Alternate Best Actor 1966: Results
5. Oskar Werner in Fahrenheit 451- Werner gives a fairly effective performance as a man who goes to a cog in the machine to a free thinker but the power of his work is somewhat muted when the director basically takes over for him at the end of the film.
Best Scene: Montag confronts his wife and her friends.
4. David Hemmings in Blow-Up- Hemmings gives a good performance as a photographer in a haze who is forced to drift out of it when he discovers something unusual in a photograph.
Best Scene: Thomas tries to tell his agent about the murder.
3. James Mason in The Deadly Affair- James Mason gives a great and surprisingly emotionally charged performance as a government agent who lives through too many double crosses in both his professional and private life.
Best Scene: Dobbs figures out who his wife's most current affair is with.
2. Tatsuya Nakadai in The Sword of Doom- See Wallach's summary.
Best Scene: Ryunosuke "confronts" his past.
1. Eli Wallach in The Good, The Bad and the Ugly- Good Prediction Psifonian. Well this was not an easy choice to make as this year came down to Eli Wallach's and Tatsuya Nakadai's performances for me. Both are brilliant very physical performances that both excel in leading films even though they technically play reprehensible characters, in Nakadai's case extremely reprehensible. They are both outstanding in very different ways with Wallach giving a hilarious and very entertaining performance, and Nakdai is absolutely magnetic while being uncompromising in his depiction of the evil nature of his character. To try to decide between the two I re-watched my favorite scenes of each of their performances well that did not help either only reassuring the fact that I love both of their performances. I have to choose one though therefore I choose Wallach... I guess for the moment right now at this second.
Best Scene: Tuco meets with his brother.
Overall Rank:
Best Scene: Montag confronts his wife and her friends.
4. David Hemmings in Blow-Up- Hemmings gives a good performance as a photographer in a haze who is forced to drift out of it when he discovers something unusual in a photograph.
Best Scene: Thomas tries to tell his agent about the murder.
3. James Mason in The Deadly Affair- James Mason gives a great and surprisingly emotionally charged performance as a government agent who lives through too many double crosses in both his professional and private life.
Best Scene: Dobbs figures out who his wife's most current affair is with.
2. Tatsuya Nakadai in The Sword of Doom- See Wallach's summary.
Best Scene: Ryunosuke "confronts" his past.
1. Eli Wallach in The Good, The Bad and the Ugly- Good Prediction Psifonian. Well this was not an easy choice to make as this year came down to Eli Wallach's and Tatsuya Nakadai's performances for me. Both are brilliant very physical performances that both excel in leading films even though they technically play reprehensible characters, in Nakadai's case extremely reprehensible. They are both outstanding in very different ways with Wallach giving a hilarious and very entertaining performance, and Nakdai is absolutely magnetic while being uncompromising in his depiction of the evil nature of his character. To try to decide between the two I re-watched my favorite scenes of each of their performances well that did not help either only reassuring the fact that I love both of their performances. I have to choose one though therefore I choose Wallach... I guess for the moment right now at this second.
Best Scene: Tuco meets with his brother.
Overall Rank:
- Eli Wallach in The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
- Tatsuya Nakadai in The Sword of Doom
- Paul Scofield in A Man For All Seasons
- Richard Burton in Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf
- Rock Hudson in Seconds
- Uttam Kumar in Nayak
- Michael Caine in Alfie
- Per Oscarsson in Hunger
- Donald Pleasence in Cul-de-Sac
- Clint Eastwood in The Good, The Bad and the Ugly
- Tatsuya Nakadai in The Face of Another
- Sergei Bondarchuk in War and Peace Part I
- Peter O'Toole in How To Steal a Million
- David Hemmings in Blow-Up
- Lee Marvin in The Professionals
- Robert Mitchum in El Dorado
- Max von Sydow in Hawaii
- Lino Ventura in Le Deuxieme Souffle
- David Warner - Morgan - A Suitable Case For Treatment
- Roddy McDowall in Lord Love a Duck
- Burt Lancaster in The Professionals
- Jean Martin in The Battle of Algiers
- Paul Newman in Harper
- Vyacheslav Tikhonov in War and Peace Part I
- Anatoly Solonitsyn in Andrei Rublev
- Eddie Axberg in Here is Your Life
- Adam West in Batman
- Jack Lemmon in The Fortune Cookie
- Jean-Louis Trintignant in A Man and a Woman
- Oskar Werner in Fahrenheit 451
- Steve McQueen in The Sand Pebbles
- Lee Van Cleef in The Big Gundown
- Michael Caine in Funeral in Berlin
- Václav Neckář in Closely Watched Trains
- Lionel Strander in Cul-de-Sac
- Michael Caine in Gambit
- Alan Arkin in The Russians are Coming, The Russians are Coming
- Tomas Millan in The Big Gundown
- James Garner in Grand Prix
- Yves Montand in Grand Prix
- Brahim Hadjadj in The Battle of Algiers
- Charlton Heston in Khartoum
- John Wayne El Dorado
- Zero Mostel in A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum
- Robert Redford in The Chase
- Peter Cook in The Wrong Box
- Marlon Brandon in The Appaloosa
- Michael Caine in The Wrong Box
- Marlon Brando in The Chase
- Franco Nero in Django
- Carl Reiner in The Russians are Coming, The Russians are Coming
- Paul Newman in Torn Curtain
- James Garner in A Man Could Get Killed
- Peter Kastner in You're a Big Boy Now
- Stephen Boyd in Fantastic Voyage
- Bill Travers in Born Free
Sunday, 1 September 2013
Alternate Best Actor 1966: Oskar Werner in Fahrenheit 451
Oskar Werner did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Guy Montag in Fahrenheit 451.
Fahrenheit 451 is a bit of an odd adaptation of Ray Bradbury's novel about a dystopian future where firemen burn books which have been banned. The film frankly looks too 60's for its futuristic setting, and the changes from the novel don't really work for the most part. Also the choice to have Julie Christie play both Guy Montag's wife and the free spirited Clarisse seems quite unnecessary coming off as distracting more than anything. Having said that it still does hold some interest as at least one attempt to adapt the novel to the screen.
Another strange choice made in this film is the casting of Oskar Werner as Guy Montag. He definitely is not the first name that comes to my mind when I think of an average man of the 60's. Stuart Whitman, if was in The Mark type form, probably would have been the ideal man for the part of Guy Montag who at the beginning of the story is suppose to be just an average cog in the machine of society. He works as a fireman and does his job just as he should without any problems. Werner though is a very good actor and despite maybe not being the perfect choice in terms of casting he still commits himself particularly early on in the film as Guy pretty much just does what he is told, and doesn't seem to have any qualms about it.
Werner, as he apparently stated himself, plays Montag in almost a robotic manner early on. This actually fits perfectly for Montag's role in the film as he just is fitting in his place and nothing more. Werner plays him repressed in his emotions quite effectively because he is a man who not only seems to care nothing about the things that he is burning and the ideas they represent, but as well at home where he should be happy he still seems aloof just a man going through the motions. Werner importantly doesn't make him sad really just almost in a trance of indifference to all that is going on around him and being exactly the servant that the society wishes him to be.
The transition of Montag is still handled pretty well by Oskar Werner at least in the beginning as he starts to question just burning the books and starts to read them. Werner brings a quiet emotional resonance as he frankly just loosens on the robotics of the man and we see a fire instead building in Montag. Werner actually keeps it rather subtle which works well for Montag's character since after all Montag still must keep his revelation to himself. Werner builds the emotional pressure in Montag as well as the interest in the nature of books as well as his anger involving the treatment of the books, and his initial bursts of emotion at his wife and her friends as their behavior still fits to what society desires.
A problem though arises later in the film as the development of Montag almost seems to stop and unfortunately Francois Truffaut seems to take over for Oskar Werner in the development of Montag. One of the most pivotal scenes in which it is discovered that Montag has been hiding books and reading them and he is instructed by his chief to destroy his own home Werner is barely shown. This is particularly notable when Montag turns his flamethrower to one of his fellow fire men where it is hard to notice what Montag feels in the scene since Werner is not really allowed to even show his reactions. This continues pretty much to the end where Werner is given very little to do and it is a shame as Montag final transition to a man away from his old shell could have been truly powerful if Werner had been allowed to honestly portray this.
I should note that whenever Werner is allowed to show how Montag is feeling toward the end he is good and believable still. Werner portrayal though mostly is just glimpses of the man. These are fairly basic reactions to just what is going on around him. To be completely fair Werner is always believable in these reactions and never once does he fall short in terms of his actual performance. His character arc though is cut short due to Truffaut basically putting his performance to the side for the ending. Werner really could have made Guy Montag's story from drone to a free man something very special if he had been allowed to bring Montag fully to the end of the journey. Oskar Werner certainly showed the promise of this in the first 2/3rds of his performance, but Werner's work is cut short.
Fahrenheit 451 is a bit of an odd adaptation of Ray Bradbury's novel about a dystopian future where firemen burn books which have been banned. The film frankly looks too 60's for its futuristic setting, and the changes from the novel don't really work for the most part. Also the choice to have Julie Christie play both Guy Montag's wife and the free spirited Clarisse seems quite unnecessary coming off as distracting more than anything. Having said that it still does hold some interest as at least one attempt to adapt the novel to the screen.
Another strange choice made in this film is the casting of Oskar Werner as Guy Montag. He definitely is not the first name that comes to my mind when I think of an average man of the 60's. Stuart Whitman, if was in The Mark type form, probably would have been the ideal man for the part of Guy Montag who at the beginning of the story is suppose to be just an average cog in the machine of society. He works as a fireman and does his job just as he should without any problems. Werner though is a very good actor and despite maybe not being the perfect choice in terms of casting he still commits himself particularly early on in the film as Guy pretty much just does what he is told, and doesn't seem to have any qualms about it.
Werner, as he apparently stated himself, plays Montag in almost a robotic manner early on. This actually fits perfectly for Montag's role in the film as he just is fitting in his place and nothing more. Werner plays him repressed in his emotions quite effectively because he is a man who not only seems to care nothing about the things that he is burning and the ideas they represent, but as well at home where he should be happy he still seems aloof just a man going through the motions. Werner importantly doesn't make him sad really just almost in a trance of indifference to all that is going on around him and being exactly the servant that the society wishes him to be.
The transition of Montag is still handled pretty well by Oskar Werner at least in the beginning as he starts to question just burning the books and starts to read them. Werner brings a quiet emotional resonance as he frankly just loosens on the robotics of the man and we see a fire instead building in Montag. Werner actually keeps it rather subtle which works well for Montag's character since after all Montag still must keep his revelation to himself. Werner builds the emotional pressure in Montag as well as the interest in the nature of books as well as his anger involving the treatment of the books, and his initial bursts of emotion at his wife and her friends as their behavior still fits to what society desires.
A problem though arises later in the film as the development of Montag almost seems to stop and unfortunately Francois Truffaut seems to take over for Oskar Werner in the development of Montag. One of the most pivotal scenes in which it is discovered that Montag has been hiding books and reading them and he is instructed by his chief to destroy his own home Werner is barely shown. This is particularly notable when Montag turns his flamethrower to one of his fellow fire men where it is hard to notice what Montag feels in the scene since Werner is not really allowed to even show his reactions. This continues pretty much to the end where Werner is given very little to do and it is a shame as Montag final transition to a man away from his old shell could have been truly powerful if Werner had been allowed to honestly portray this.
I should note that whenever Werner is allowed to show how Montag is feeling toward the end he is good and believable still. Werner portrayal though mostly is just glimpses of the man. These are fairly basic reactions to just what is going on around him. To be completely fair Werner is always believable in these reactions and never once does he fall short in terms of his actual performance. His character arc though is cut short due to Truffaut basically putting his performance to the side for the ending. Werner really could have made Guy Montag's story from drone to a free man something very special if he had been allowed to bring Montag fully to the end of the journey. Oskar Werner certainly showed the promise of this in the first 2/3rds of his performance, but Werner's work is cut short.
Thursday, 29 August 2013
Alternate Best Actor 1966
And the Nominees Were Not:
James Mason in The Deadly Affair
Eli Wallach in The Good, The Bad and the Ugly
Tatsuya Nakadai in The Sword of Doom
David Hemmings in Blow-Up
Oskar Werner in Fahrenheit 451
James Mason in The Deadly Affair
Eli Wallach in The Good, The Bad and the Ugly
Tatsuya Nakadai in The Sword of Doom
David Hemmings in Blow-Up
Oskar Werner in Fahrenheit 451
Friday, 7 January 2011
Best Actor 1965: Results
5. Laurence Olivier in Othello- Laurence Olivier is always a master of the language of Shakespeare, but his performance as Othello is not as finely attuned as his other screen performances. It is a theatrical work, that is odd in many ways but I still think it was effective.
4. Lee Marvin in Cat Ballou- Marvin is properly menacing as the bad brother, and is hilarious as Kid Shelleen the good brother. It is a very enjoyable performance that I really do not mind that it won at all.
3. Oskar Werner in Ship of Fools- Werner gives a strong performance, and with Simone Signoret create a charming, yet tragic story of two people who find each other for a time. It is terrific, natural work in an otherwise bad film.
2. Rod Steiger in The Pawnbroker- Steiger gives an uncompromising powerful performance, as man who has become pessimistic and lost his humanity due to his horrific treatment. He creates an excellent portrait of this man and gives a truly dark, but an incredibly effective one.
1. Richard Burton in The Spy Who Came in From The Cold- Richard Burton is excellent in showing the dark sad history of this spy, and also his pessimistic view (Another pessimistic character no wonder Marvin won) of his current condition. He handles both the pretending to be a drunken defective and in being in reality a tired yet still functioning and technically loyal spy fed up with loss of humanity with perfection. Burton and Steiger was a hard choice for me, their performances are both equally great.
Deserving Performances:
Sean Connery in The Hill
Omar Sharif in Doctor Zhivago
Sidney Poitier in A Patch of Blue
Lee Van Cleef in For A Few Dollars More
Terrence Stamp in The Collector
4. Lee Marvin in Cat Ballou- Marvin is properly menacing as the bad brother, and is hilarious as Kid Shelleen the good brother. It is a very enjoyable performance that I really do not mind that it won at all.
3. Oskar Werner in Ship of Fools- Werner gives a strong performance, and with Simone Signoret create a charming, yet tragic story of two people who find each other for a time. It is terrific, natural work in an otherwise bad film.
2. Rod Steiger in The Pawnbroker- Steiger gives an uncompromising powerful performance, as man who has become pessimistic and lost his humanity due to his horrific treatment. He creates an excellent portrait of this man and gives a truly dark, but an incredibly effective one.
1. Richard Burton in The Spy Who Came in From The Cold- Richard Burton is excellent in showing the dark sad history of this spy, and also his pessimistic view (Another pessimistic character no wonder Marvin won) of his current condition. He handles both the pretending to be a drunken defective and in being in reality a tired yet still functioning and technically loyal spy fed up with loss of humanity with perfection. Burton and Steiger was a hard choice for me, their performances are both equally great.
Deserving Performances:
Sean Connery in The Hill
Omar Sharif in Doctor Zhivago
Sidney Poitier in A Patch of Blue
Lee Van Cleef in For A Few Dollars More
Terrence Stamp in The Collector
Labels:
1965,
Best Actor,
Laurence Olivier,
Lee Marvin,
oscar,
Oskar Werner,
Richard Burton,
Rod Steiger
Wednesday, 5 January 2011
Best Actor 1965: Oskar Werner in Ship of Fools
Oskar Werner received his only Oscar nomination for portraying Dr. Schumann in Ship of Fools.
Ship of Fools is a very flawed ensemble piece. I think the stories are spliced together very poorly with many being absolutely meaningless, some being unimpressive, and one being quite effective. The performances are the same way. There are performances like Jose Ferrer's which is astonishingly terrible, Lee Marvin who has a pointless character and there is no surprise that he was nominated for Cat Ballou and not this film, but luckily there is also Oskar Werner.
Oskar Werner easily could have been a dual nominee this year and in my opinion he should have been, since he also gave a very strong supporting performance in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, for which he won the Golden Globe, and he should have been nominated for the Oscar. Ship of Fools is an ensemble film, but if there is a lead than it most certainly is Werner. I found him to be the central figure of the film, and actually interacts a little with the other stories and not only his own.
Oskar Werner is the ships doctor, the ship filled with all sorts of characters but as the film says filled with fools. Werner's story on the ship is his relationship with another passenger La Condesa (Simone Signoret) who joins when they stop off at Cuba. This is really the only good part of the film, and this is because of Signoret and Werner. There part of there story is a romantic, but also tragic one, a story of love found between these two travelers but the love cannot really be fulfilled.
Werner and Signoret are perfect together from their first scene where Schumann medically helps Condesa in her cabin. There chemistry is so perfect and natural together that is simply wonderful. Together both of them are just spot on in creating the relationship between these two characters. They create a relationship that is not perfect, but it is incredibly charming one between them, despite also being a tragic one. This sort of relationship is incredibly complicated and difficult to be natural, but Werner and Signoret do this together without fault creating the only truly honest scenes in the film, and basically the only good scenes in the film.
Werner suggests so much about the doctor in the scenes with Signoret, and together they really tell about a lot about their characters even with the shortness of the screen time together. Werner has a few brief moments outside of his ones with Signoret. They mostly are showing the good nature of Schumann as he helps those on the ships, and also his anger at certain people on their ship for their narrow mind views. His major scene for him without Signoret is his final one. His final moments are made incredibly heartbreaking by Werner, and it is a tragic but a proper end to Schumann's, and La Cadesa's relationship. Werner's performance is not long, but it a strong effective piece of acting, that works wonderfully well with Signoret's equally strong work.
Ship of Fools is a very flawed ensemble piece. I think the stories are spliced together very poorly with many being absolutely meaningless, some being unimpressive, and one being quite effective. The performances are the same way. There are performances like Jose Ferrer's which is astonishingly terrible, Lee Marvin who has a pointless character and there is no surprise that he was nominated for Cat Ballou and not this film, but luckily there is also Oskar Werner.
Oskar Werner easily could have been a dual nominee this year and in my opinion he should have been, since he also gave a very strong supporting performance in The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, for which he won the Golden Globe, and he should have been nominated for the Oscar. Ship of Fools is an ensemble film, but if there is a lead than it most certainly is Werner. I found him to be the central figure of the film, and actually interacts a little with the other stories and not only his own.
Oskar Werner is the ships doctor, the ship filled with all sorts of characters but as the film says filled with fools. Werner's story on the ship is his relationship with another passenger La Condesa (Simone Signoret) who joins when they stop off at Cuba. This is really the only good part of the film, and this is because of Signoret and Werner. There part of there story is a romantic, but also tragic one, a story of love found between these two travelers but the love cannot really be fulfilled.
Werner and Signoret are perfect together from their first scene where Schumann medically helps Condesa in her cabin. There chemistry is so perfect and natural together that is simply wonderful. Together both of them are just spot on in creating the relationship between these two characters. They create a relationship that is not perfect, but it is incredibly charming one between them, despite also being a tragic one. This sort of relationship is incredibly complicated and difficult to be natural, but Werner and Signoret do this together without fault creating the only truly honest scenes in the film, and basically the only good scenes in the film.
Werner suggests so much about the doctor in the scenes with Signoret, and together they really tell about a lot about their characters even with the shortness of the screen time together. Werner has a few brief moments outside of his ones with Signoret. They mostly are showing the good nature of Schumann as he helps those on the ships, and also his anger at certain people on their ship for their narrow mind views. His major scene for him without Signoret is his final one. His final moments are made incredibly heartbreaking by Werner, and it is a tragic but a proper end to Schumann's, and La Cadesa's relationship. Werner's performance is not long, but it a strong effective piece of acting, that works wonderfully well with Signoret's equally strong work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)