Friday 1 July 2022

Alternate Best Actor 1979: Malcolm McDowell in Time After Time

Malcolm McDowell did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying H.G. Wells in Time After Time. 

Time After Time follows H.G. Wells attempting to stop Jack the Ripper through time. A true breath of fresh of air of film as enjoyable entertainment even with its final scene that has a bit of dud element regarding Jack's final fate. Although this was unquestionably helped by a dire triple feature I suffered of Caligula, more on that in a bit, Natural Enemies, one of the most miserable, repetitive and just mean spirited films that is best avoided by all, and 1941, which is almost fascinating in its particular failure however not enough to make it any less of a slog. 

Anyway back to Time After Time which is a low key entertainment, that opens basically the same as Murder by Decree as we see Jack the Ripper stalking victims though this time making his escape via going to a dinner party held by H.G. Wells who in this universe just finished inventing a time machine. McDowell playing a unique role for both playing not only a decent man but in fact a hero as the central protagonist here, but also playing a rather modest fellow. This is a far cry from his other noted work as the infamous Caligula in the infamous film Caligula. A film that would be best used by abstinence training facilities to ward individuals off from ever having sex again, as never has sex, nudity and eroticism in general come off as less appealing as in Caligula. If you want to ensure no one is turned on in a given situation, just watch Caligula, of course that is essentially the opposite of seemingly its intention. The film has little else to note except its attempts a debauchery as it barely has what one would describe as a story, and characters are almost all one note sex fiends of one kind or another. McDowell is the best part of the film, as opposed to Peter O'Toole who just may be the highest actor ever recorded on film and I'm not referring to his distance as positioned from the earth, or John Gielgud who almost is comical in that he is bringing a more traditional attempt at gravitas. McDowell understands the film he's in, and is trying to bring something to it. He has a nice deranged smile throughout it all, and probably that's the best way to go, as one would have to be deranged to have agreed to be in that production it seems. So that energy McDowell brings does work, and again also works for the nature of Caligula in the film as the most depraved man in existence essentially. Again though the writing is atrocious so basically McDowell just needs to float from scene to scene being either sexually deranged, violently deranged or violently deranged while being sexual. McDowell does this as well as to be expected however he can't quite pave away beyond the garbage dump that is around him. He's good to the extent the film allows him to be, but the film isn't interested in Caligula as a character, it's just interested in whatever grotesqueries they decided he got up to. 

Anyway back to his absolutely wonderful work in Time After Time that is far cry from his work in Caligula in basically every way imaginable. McDowell's work here is remarkable because it is so anti-McDowell, in a performance that not only asks him to be subdued, but also demands specific charm from him rather than say the charisma we typically get here. McDowell from his first appearance presents us with a most affable Wells, with this quiet earnestness he brings as he speaks of his new invention. It is with a slight smile but even a bit of shyness that McDowell shows someone who hesitates to even speak of his accomplishments too openly. There is a sincerity in his eyes though as he presents them and even speaks towards his lack of bravery in regards to testing the machine out. He makes one instantly like his Wells though as this intelligent but very unlikely hero for us to follow. He takes from the respected author to making him an underdog to root for with incredible ease. The task of hero is then thrust upon him when his dinner guest turns out to be none other than Jack the Ripper who escapes via Wells's time machine, leaving Wells needing to do the same, leading him to find himself within San Francisco in 1979. Here in a way is where we get the secret weapon of the film, and really of McDowell's performance, as we follow Wells as he attempts to navigate the future. This as we have a whole secondary film really as we follow Wells as he discovers this new world of phones, televisions, automobiles and McDonalds. McDowell is terrific by bringing this sense of discovery in his performance as even reacting to french fries or a McDonald's bench, there is this honest sense of curiosity that he brings. McDowell touches upon it with the right comedic sense, he doesn't overplay it to the point of caveman, but brings the right touches of humor in the moments of Wells's lack of certainty with the various new inventions. I have particular affection for the way McDowell speaks towards every phone as though it were a distant loudspeaker. McDowell awkwardness manages to be funny while also making Wells most endearing. In this whole setup McDowell creates so much of the entertainment of the film by realizing this fun naturally as Wells is truly a man out of time trying to figure things out. He makes that right sense of discovery both in disbelief and just a little bit of proper humorousness in just showing the man being out of his depth. 

The situation gets complicated when Wells comes across a bank teller Amy Robbins (Mary Steenburgen), who takes a liking to him. Again this is such a different side to McDowell who typically on screen has less savory relationships with women more often than not. This is a great change of pace for him as McDowell is winning in providing just the sweetest of charm in his chemistry with Steenburgen. McDowell has a great naturalism in projecting the modest in his show of love with her that is most appealing, even if Steenburgen's performance makes me very confused as I go from randomly from thinking she's just a unique presence to terrible from moment to moment. Nonetheless the two create the proper investment in their chemistry that is off-beat in the right way with McDowell showing Wells always to be very much the man of his time navigating the modern woman with these terrific expressions of amusement, confusion and positive fascination. This in turn raises the stakes as Wells attempts to stop Jack who has no trouble jumping head first back into his murdering ways in the 70's. McDowell is fantastic in every moment of these scenes because his avenue is so idiosyncratic. In that he is never a simple hero, and take any moment there's much to be taken from it from sort of the left field choices in his work that are always absolutely winning. Take his light comic timing when Wells attempts to convince the local police to help him by giving Sherlock Holmes as his pseudonym. Even in the way he runs, or operates a telephone booth, McDowell brings the right uncertainty and less than capable power to a man just trying his best in a theater that is far from his expertise. He's equally good though in showing his reactions of horror towards Jack, where the power within McDowell's emotional breakdowns is that of a wholly decent man suffering greatly from witnessing the worst of humanity. McDowell gives a very moving performance in these moments and adds an extra bit of gravitas to the proceedings. Of course that is the truth of the entirety of McDowell's work here, which is always adding a bit extra to the point I think his performance is really what makes the film work. It could've been easy to make Wells too much of a cartoon, or too much of a stiff, but McDowell finds the right tonal balance to make a hero you want to see succeed in love, against the ripper, and also have just some fun watching as he struggles to operate a telephone. 

110 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the casts of all 3 films.

Luke Higham said...

*4 films

I'm glad you liked him in Caligula.

Luke Higham said...

And your rating for McDowell in Caligula.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I remember actually liking 1941 when I saw it as a kid. Maybe it is bad.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on these 2 sections of McDowell's SAG interview.

39:10-51:45

1:15:30-1:23:00

Luke Higham said...

Youtube.com/watch?v=ozhWcadhDA0

Luke Higham said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Luke Higham said...

Peter O'Toole was high as fuck on Marijuana during that entire shoot.

Luke Higham said...

You must've loved that Hotel Room scene a great deal to not mention DW by name in your review.

Anonymous said...

Watching Caligula felt like seeing Alex Delarge's fantasies come to life.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Now after reading that review and watching the video Luke suggested I'm trying to imagine how would a surreal biopic about the making of Caligula look like and I'm not sure if that would be most amazing or the most horrid thing to see.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Caligula's production design and what did you think of the decapitation wall machine.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Stranger Things really stuck the landing this year. Honestly the finale might be their best episode.

8000S said...

Louis: What are your thoughts on the ending of Drunken Angel?

Calvin Law said...

Really enjoyed him in this. Delightful and different use of an actor I did not know could be this endearing/charming.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I mostly liked Volume 2 of Stranger Things. Sadie Sink still overall MVP, but Millie Bobby Brown and Caleb McLaughlin are right behind her.

Luke Higham said...

I really hope Dewaere gets a 5 on the next review.

Perfectionist said...

Regarding Stranger Things(SPOILER ALERT),










I want to ask you guys if you feel that the REDACTED should have died for the impact there?? Considering this is a criticism that I have been hearing a lot about the finale...

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Perfectionist_ad: The way they handled it wasn't perfect, but I felt it was more than impactful enough for the most part.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If you actually do consider doing write-ups on your female 5s in the distant future, the way I personally would structure it would be to start off with the Silent Era and work your way up to the present and for each year in both categories go from the lowest 5 to the highest.

Glenn said...

Louis, thoughts on 'Across The Stars' and 'Han & Leia' (Love Theme) from Attack Of The Clones and The Empire Strikes Back respectively.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your director and cast of Inherit the Wind in 1970s, 2000s, 2010s and 2020s.

Matt Mustin said...

Anonymous: For 2010s, Tommy Lee Jones for director and star.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Rules don't change just because I mentioned the films, also I'd rather separate my mind from them for a bit.

McDowell is a great storyteller, and his Caligula mentions of both the ridiculousness of it all and O'Toole state is hilarious. Same goes for his Olivier tale which is a classic Olivier, similar to some of Peter Ustinov's recounting though I think McDowell is far more affectionate towards Olivier. Especially enjoyed McDowell impression of Olivier's of starting big then bringing it in.

Steenburgen - (I don't how to rate her honestly here, as her performance kind of baffled me as there are so many moments where I thought "That's just weird choice" to "that's a weird choice that kind of works". I definitely liked her chemistry with McDowell though so on that front her performance definitely worked even if her presence is hard to place as wonderfully unique or a bit awkward. Maybe a bit of both.)

Robert:

Well to be fair, it is pure slapstick, I might've liked it as a kid as well...maybe.

8000's:

Drunken Angel's ending is right within Kurosawa's wheelhouse of the bittersweet, though here more on the hopeful side of things even with the unfortunate fate of Mifune's character, it does create the hope for the other characters to be rid of the old Yakuza. The real triumph being the survival of Sanada's other patient. Wonderfully filmed though in showing the slum still, but creating this hope within the slum by focusing on the joy of the two characters as there is some optimism to be embraced within the tough world.

Glenn:

I mean what a gorgeous love theme for such a dull dull romance. Definitely Williams is reworking some of his Hook score, but I think effectively so towards a real powerful sentiment in giving the Star Wars flair. It is a gorgeous epic theme, and if only the romance was willing to match its power. This in just really bringing so much grandeur in the build and return to the main melody, again...what a shame.

Now here's a romance worthy of its theme with Han and Leia. This with such a gorgeous theme and really kind of the sense of build within the romance itself. From the brief instrumentation, to building with the strings as the full theme begins to implement itself with such profound and striking sense of feeling. Again though only building itself more with the Star Wars grandeur, but really a genius theme in that it crafts the idea of the romance in itself in that it starts in spurts then is oh so powerful when it fully reveals itself.

Anonymous:

Inherit the Wind 1970's directed by Sidney Lumet:

Darrow: Henry Fonda
Bryan: James Stewart
Mary Bryan: Donna Reed
Mencken: Walter Matthau
Scopes: Donald Sutherland

Inherit the Wind 2000's directed by Tommy Lee Jones (I concur with Matt):

Darrow: Tommy Lee Jones
Brady: Albert Finney
Mary Bryan: Katherine Ross
Mencken: Michael Keaton
Scopes: Brendan Fraser

Inherit the Wind 2010's directed by Bennett Miller:

Darrow: Billy Bob Thornton
Brady: Jeff Bridges
Mary Bryan: Laurie Metcalf
Mencken: Brad Pitt
Scopes: Joseph Mazzello

Inherit the Wind 2020's directed by Steve McQueen:

Darrow: Mark Rylance
Brady: Jeff Daniels
Mary Bryan: Embeth Davidtz
Mencken: Michael Fassbender
Scopes: Jack Lowden

Mitchell Murray said...

Everyone: On the note of "Caligula" and productions regarding Roman history, who would you cast as Caligula's nephew Nero?

The subject is far from comfortable, I concede, but there might be some potential in exploring the dangers of Nero's character; Specifically, the entitlement and cruelty of a teenaged boy who never fully matured, and who was thrust into a position he never wanted or prepared for.



Matt Mustin said...

Mitchell: You know what, Taron Egerton could probably do it.

Mitchell Murray said...

Also, for a music related question, what would be everyone's thoughts on the following songs?

Courage - The Tragically Hip
For the Glory - All Good Things
Hollow Dreams - Brandon Yates (Theme for the Death Battle match up "Madara Vs Aizen", and I'll link the animation itself for context).


Madara Vs Aizen (Approx. 4 minutes):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFAEBdFOsKw

Mitchell Murray said...

Matt: Fully agree there...he even has a rough resemblance to some of Nero's depictions, apart from the neckbeard.

Calvin Law said...

Saw Elvis, I liked it actually though it is far too surface level. Butler is very good and I don't begrudge the early Best Actor buzz, though Song Kang-ho all the way for me. Hanks is an embarrassment but Stephen Root would've been perfect in the role, but honestly the role just should've been trimmed down to make space for other elements.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: What's your current top 5 for 1999 and 2016 Best Original Song.

Matthew Montada said...

Calvin: ratings for the cast of Elvis?

Calvin Law said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Calvin Law said...

Butler - 4.5
Hanks - 1
DeJonge - 3.5
Thomson - 2
Roxburgh - 2.5
Harrison - 3
Wenham - 2.5
Smit-McPhee - 2.5
Montgomery - 3.5

8000S said...

Louis: Thoughts on Nakai's and Atsuta's work in Throne of Blood and Black River, respectively.

Anonymous said...

Louis: I liked your choices. Thanks

Anonymous said...

While we're discussing HG Wells, how would you rank his literary works you've read Louis?

8000S said...

Mitchell: Who the hell cares about Death Battle anymore?

Marcus said...

8000S: Maybe let's not talk down what someone else is interested in? People are allowed to like things other than Ozu and Bergman's films.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Louis: your 10 best Jeffrey Tambor moments and thoughts on his performance in Arrested Development?

Luke Higham said...

8000S: Come on man, that was really unnecessary, you should be better than that.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

8000S: Do better.

8000S said...

Luke and Tahmeed: Yeah, sorry about that.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: According to his agent, Heath Ledger was scheduled to meet with Steven Spielberg to discuss the idea of him playing Tom Hayden in a film about The Chicago 7, but he unfortunately passed away before they could do so.

Also, Ledger also considered taking on the lead role in a biopic about Sean Flynn, Errols’ son who was a Vietnam War photojournalist and went missing. Flynn was also an inspiration for Dennis Hoppers’ character in Apocalypse Now.

Thoughts?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Bryan: Suffice to say, he would've been amazing as a lead in a photojournalist's solo movie.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Luhrmann mentioned recently that Ledger was in contention for Christian in Moulin Rouge!. Thoughts on this as well.

Mitchell Murray said...

8000s: Well, I can't speak for everyone of course, but I've followed the series basically from the start. It's changed dramatically over that time, and I'm continually impressed by the team's level of research, creativity and fondness for the media involved. Once more, I owe DB a great deal for introducing me to some of my favourite series (especially in the Anime genre like "Mob Psycho 100" and "Yu Yu Hakusho"), and for educating me on characters I already knew (ex. Reverse Flash, Zatanna, Magneto, Obi Wan Kenobi, etc.).

8000S said...

Mitchell: I see. Sorry if I came out as being too harsh.

Mitchell Murray said...

8000s: It's fine.

Also, since I brought it up, "Mob Psycho 100" has a new season coming out this year, so I rewatched the first season last week. The show hits a unique note for me in that it's so vibrantly animated and funny (not to mention my kind of wierd), but is ultimately anchored by a middle school kid dealing with middle school problems. In that regard, I was again amazed by the thematic and character depth found in the series. Some points I'd particularly point out would be as followed (Spoilers ahead!):

1) Mob's literal bottling of emotions being shown as a metric - all in response to a tramautic memory and denial of his true self - is just a genius narrative device.
2) Ritsu having everything Mob wishes he had personally/socially, yet still insecure about his struggles with psychic powers, the one area his brother excels at/actively avoids.
3) Teruki builds his whole identity and status on the powers Mob reluctantly uses, only to be humbled by the first person he can't physically overpower - and more importantly, the first person who doesn't view him as special.
4) The whole branch of Claw showcased in season 1, after so much build up, turn out to be little more than kids who refuse to grow up; They hold onto a childish notion of their world being playground, refusing to accept their role in society, or that being gifted doesn't automatically make you superior or successful.
5) Reigen being a wonderful contraction as a man who's career is a total lie, but who's presence in Mob's life is wholly genuine and supportive. His ability to give Mob the advice he needs whenever it's needed, and even his way of wanting to service his clients (mind you, in ways they aren't paying for) is the crux of the character's appeal.
6) And the icing on the cake, of course, is "99" which is one of the catchiest Anime OPs I've ever heard, but also ties into the show's themes of fulfilling yourself without being overly special.

So yah, I thoroughly enjoyed revisting the show, and as someone who likes OPM, this is One's masterpiece.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Mitchell: Huh, didn't even know Season 3 was coming out before I read your comment. I'll also probably rewatch the show before the premiere.

Anonymous said...

Louis, what are your thoughts on Michael Rooker, Hugo Weaving and Cliff Curtis as actors?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Do you intend on watching The Staircase.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

1999:

1. "Mountain Town" - South Park
2. "La Resistance" - South Park (Could become my win honestly.)
3. "These Days" - Two Hands
4. "Up There" - South Park
5. "What Would Brian Boitano Do?" - South Park

2016:

1. "Audition" - La La Land
2. "Sparkle" - Your Name
3. "You're Welcome" - Moana
4. "Start A Fire" - La La Land
5. "Brown Shoes" - Sing Street

8000's:

Again Nakai truly should be spoken of as one of the all time great cinematographers consistently. This as he really excels at whatever it was it was tasked with. Here we get another Kurosawa choice in what really is one film of his shot like a horror film with the deeply contrasting black and white, but also the choice of composition and space which emphasizes specific space so brilliantly in either creating the characters in isolation, or isolating an idea such as the approach arming or the Mifune's own army all looking at him at the end. It is incredibly dynamic work both in terms of the lighting and visual composition, that again is unique within the genre with such power.

Again while simply a "good" film, and less than that merely by Kobayashi standards, in that you merely expect more from him, incredibly well shot still by Atsuta in creating a modern style though still with strong contrasting shots, and a strong use of expanded space with creating the composition of shots that do indeed grant visual storytelling so beautifully.

Ytrewq:

I mean his performance in Arrested Development was a hilarious home run call in every so many scenes throughout the series, as he was always very specifically used and absolutely did dominant in his hilarious striking one offs as George Sr. with the right comedic domineering energy to his work. This as he managed to find the funny basically in playing the character with a certain consistent nefarious quality, while still being able to be naturally silly as well. His work as Oscar I think works in terms of being the contrast to George, and in a way is more subdued, though works in the purposefully less comical confines.

1. Fake kidnapping - AR
2. Money in the Banana stand truth - AR
3. The power of conversion - AR
4. "What the fuck are you doing" - The Death of Stalin
5. Mexican legal system loophole - AR
6. "I don't let them tell me what to do" - AR
7. Figuring out the batting order - AR
8. Reprimanding Tobias - AR
9. Deciding Beria's fate - The Death of Stalin
10. Teaching lessons - AR

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

I mean both seem roles that he would've been ideal for as obviously he could fly off the handle via the Dark Knight or even that Lord of Dogstown energy would've worked for Flynn. For Hayden just his leading man energy would've been ideal there.

Luke:

Well he could sing, and be charming, so I think he could've done as well as McGregor potentially.

Probably not.

Anonymous:

Rooker is just a great actor who I think always found him typecast to some extent off his Henry role, even before that film got a wide release oddly enough. He's always been pigeonholed as a slightly nefarious sort or hard man, and to his credit though he's consistently good in that type of role. He has a fantastic emotional range even within his menacing frame, as shown by Henry best of course, but you see that throughout his career to the point it is basically a hidden weapon. He's someone who also pretty consistently gives it his all regardless of the size of the part or the quality of the film. I mean take his performance in Cliffhanger where he absolutely tries his best to bring a genuine acting turn in what is just a cheesy action movie. Although he's someone who I think hasn't always been asked to stretch his range in terms of the characters he's asked to play, he has always been consistently good in those characters, and has shown range even within those limitations. A properly great character actor who I wish was used more than he is.

Hugo Weaving is actually kind of an interesting actor, like Ben Mendelsohn, though possibly to an even more extreme extent which is if you take his work in Oceania related productions compared to his American productions you really get almost two different performers. Now American productions Hugo Weaving is a good actor, a charismatic villain who typically is fun to watch but very much is always the villain. The only exception to this I can really think of is his vocal work in V for Vendetta. Now scratching even the small surface to his LOTR work, you get to see him play just a good character with required gravitas. Go a little further though and then you unearth performances like in Proof, Priscilla, The Dressmaker and of course his heartbreaking work in Hacksaw Ridge, where there is such a great range to this performer on the whole. Now I haven't even seen half of his lauded Australian work, but the work I have shows he can do a lot more than villains, showing a great emotional range along with his striking presence, and his ability actually to do off-beat along with extremely straight performances.

Cliff Curtis is an actor frequently cast as anyone other than a Maori New Zealander, and certainly is good in fitting to any setting he gets thrown into. Another actor like Weaving actually where if you only watch American productions his range seems less utilized. Although Curtis is typically consistently good in his bit parts and typically adds a little bit of something. He always has seen like someone who has more in the tank than is always used though. Proof of that is The Dark Horse which was a bigger role, and he was terrific in it, showing so much he rarely gets to show in terms of emotional depth and empathy in his role. Someone who doesn't get to do that enough, though he is someone you can always depend on to give a brief character life, and hope that they'll get some depth in terms of the writing....though that rarely happens sadly for the latter.

Robert MacFarlane said...

What happened to Drive It Like You Stole It?

Louis Morgan said...

I don't know, I think I heard it too many times. Admittedly it's more to do with me than the song.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: Ah, playlist syndrome.

(Also, La Resistance is the better SP song)

8000S said...

Louis: Kinda wish you also talked about the use of fog and mist in that movie, since it's fantastic.

Mitchell Murray said...

Louis: Yah, Curtis is someone who rarely seems to play characters of his own ethnicity/nationality. The one exception I've personally seen is "Whale Rider", which is a film I honestly like a lot, and he's very good in it.

Matt Mustin said...

Saw The Black Phone. It's barely even fine. The problem is that it's clearly based on a short story, because they did not do a good job expanding it. So much feels very superfluous. There is one absolutely terrific element though. Yes, you guessed right.

Thames-3
McGraw-2
Hawke-4.5(I absolutely LOVED everything he did here, there's just not much of him.)
Davies-1.5
Mitchell-3
Ransone-3(Pointless character, but he brought something to it)

Everyone else is acceptable at best.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

As for 2016, my own top 5 is:

1. 'Sparkle' - Your Name
2. 'To Find You' - Sing Street
3. 'Nandemonaiya' - Your Name
4. 'Drive it Like You Stole It' - Sing Street
5. 'Up' - Sing Street

La La Land hasn't stayed with me at all over the years.

Calvin Law said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Calvin Law said...

Thought Thor Love and Thunder was a real mixed bag, some of the humour is really grating in particular and it's way too rushed, but I did rather love its central conceit of the Two Thors.

Hemsworth: 4
Bale: 3.5
Thompson: 3.5
Waititi: 3
Portman: 4
Crowe: 3.5

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Amsterdam trailer.

Calvin Law said...

Looks like a terrible SNL parody.

Glenn said...

Luke, what are your early 2022 overall win predictions.

Luke Higham said...

Picture: Killers Of The Flower Moon
Director: Damien Chazelle - Babylon
Actor: Hugh Jackman - The Son
Actress: Ana De Armas - Blonde
Supporting Actor: Robert De Niro - Killers Of The Flower Moon
Supporting Actress: Lily Gladstone - Killers Of The Flower Moon

Mitchell Murray said...

Luke: So, I can appreciate the idea of what Russell seems to be attempting - namely the depression era backdrop and the casting of several newcomers to his films (Robbie, Schoenaerts, Malick, etc.). That being said, if the film's style is anything like "American Hustle", I'll probably be annoyed despite having so many actors I like.

8000S said...

Speaking of Babylon, it'll be interesting to see Tobey Maguire of all people as Charlie Chaplin. Can't wait for the memes.

Marcus said...

The only question I came out of that Amsterdam trailer with was how many Oscar nominations will it take for Christian Bale to get his morals back?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

*sees Chris Rock in a trailer*
Boy, I'm sure nothing wrong will come out of it.

Tim said...

what is up with Christian Bale's hair? that looks like his character from The Machinist had Buffalo Bill-ed Dr Emmett Brown

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Well I'll say this at least David O. Russell isn't Adam McKay when it comes to directing comedic dramas (I mean have liked O. Russell films outright)...but he's still David O. Russell. Seems like another probably really interesting story that is going to be filtered through Russell nonsense. I mean an amazing cast, like McKay, I wouldn't put past either as having pacts with the devil with the ensembles they can construct then often waste or misuse. Even if it is a mess, which I don't like to bet against films being good, but...you know, I would not count it out as a potential Oscar contender as even Joy was still able to get an Actress nomination. Hope its great honestly, but this wasn't a promising start in my mind.

Tony Kim said...

Amsterdam honestly looks really bad. The trailer plays like 20th Century didn't have a grasp on the film's tone and had no idea how to market it. As far as I can tell DOR seems to be going for a sort of rollicking screwball comedy vibe, but none of the laugh lines make any sense clipped out of context. Even the cinematography looks flat by Luzbeski's standards.

Good to hear "I'd Love to Change the World", though.

8000S said...

Louis: What are your thoughts on the voices of Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft? Considering Roosevelt's status as being the most badass president, you'd expect him to have a deep voice, which he didn't have.

Marcus said...

Louis: Which performers have you seen who pick the best films to be a part of consistently? (aside from John Cazale obviously).

Calvin Law said...

RIP James Caan.

RatedRStar said...

RIP James Caan

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP James Caan

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

RIP James Caan, can't believe it.

Luke Higham said...

RIP James Caan

8000S said...

R.I.P. James Caan.

Tim said...

oh no

R.I.P. James Caan

Bryan L. said...

R.I.P. James Caan

Anonymous said...

RIP James Caan.

Marcus said...

RIP James Caan

Aidan Pittman said...

R.I.P. James Caan

ruthiehenshallfan99 said...

RIP James Caan

Louis Morgan said...

RIP James Caan.

Robert MacFarlane said...

RIP, Jimmy

Louis Morgan said...

Watched Thor: Love and Thunder, thought it was a big mess. Waititi I felt pulled a James Gunn with Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2. where it seems he convinced himself he can do no wrong, which sadly leads to aggressive confidence in his comedy, which seemed to lead to not being particularly funny. Now, I liked this a bit more than Guardians 2, I at least got a chuckle here and there, BUT not consistently and for me there were quite a bit of thuds here. More so I think the choice in narrative was probably a bit mistaken as two very dark plot elements don't really cohere well with the comedy, where I think the separation of the plots helped manage the tone in Ragnarök a bit better. Although I actually do think Gorr in isolation was a good character, I think he should've been more active within the plot. The whole Jane Foster conceit I don't think hit the marks it intended particularly well as I still don't think Portman and Hemsworth have all that much chemistry. It doesn't help that the pacing is very rushed with a lot of sloppiness to the whole thing. Although I didn't hate it I guess, it definitely was a big disappointment for me.

Hemsworth - 3.5
Bale - 3.5
Thompson - 3
Waititi - 2(Hate to say it but the bit has run stale).
Crowe - 3.5(The best bit for me.)
Portman - 3

8000's:

Interesting question, Taft sounds like a respected news anchor and Roosevelt sounds like the oldie radio voice in the purest sense a voice that if any man would play him, they'd probably be best not to try a direct imitation. Much like properly McDowell above decided not to imitate Wells's actual voice given it equally is specific to a time that is hard to translate.

Marcus:

Give me a bit to research that one.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Any thoughts on the cast.

Shaggy Rogers said...

RIP James Caan.
There goes one of the last people in the movie El Dorado, he was lucky enough to work with Hawks, Wayne and Mitchum.

Matt Mustin said...

RIP James Caan and Kazuki Takahashi.

Razor said...

RIP James Caan.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Matt: Yeah, Takahashi was another big hit today. I will always cherish the screwed up little horror manga that accidentally turned into a children's card game franchise.

Maciej said...

RIP James Caan

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Hemsworth - (While I felt they balanced Thor as a bit more hapless in the last film, here I thought they tilted a little too far there. Having said that, Hemsworth acquits himself consistently even if I don't think the material is always the best. He can do the comedy, and tries to sell even the more woeful material, and tries his best to carry the dramatic moments despite again not finding his chemistry with Portman terribly potent.)

Bale - (Thought he really delivered on the emotional intensity of the role, which is to be expected and a bit of a shame that he is sidelined so frequently, as I think if his character was actively hunting our heroes this could've been a properly great comic villain. This as Bale also adds a nice creep factor to his performance in the moments of the character loving the moments of the kill. Now of course he's basically in a different movie, but he was good in his movie.)

Thompson - (Thought she was perfectly fine I just didn't think she was as well utilized here.)

Waititi - (I think Korg was used in just the right amount previously, which actually wasn't a lot total, here though he became redundant and now it was the same joke one too many times.)

Crowe - (The best part of the film in just playing the most greasy and sleazy of Zeus's possible. He has the right amount of fun with it, and is genuinely just completely amusing here, being easily the highlight of the film. This as it was one scene where the comedy worked thanks to Crowe.)

Portman - (Again lacks that chemistry, but I also thought she really wasn't very good in the comedic moments to be perfectly honest. I did think she was more than decent though in her more dramatic moments even if those beats I thought were very rushed.)

Marcus:

I'll leave off self-directors (E.g. Charlie Chaplin)

Daniel Day-Lewis - (Even with Nine and I hear his few hard to find 80's films, his extreme selectivity pays off.)

Tom Cruise - (His stinkers stand out because usually his films are pretty good.)

James Stewart - (Really haven't seen many truly bad films featuring him.)

Burt Lancaster - (Again haven't seen too many stinkers from him...even when I might not even always love his performances.)

Cary Grant - (Once you get past his shaky early work, his films are typically at least good.)

Humphrey Bogart - (Again rare is the outright stinker with him along with several classics.)

Montgomery Clift - (Even with Raintree County and The Young Lions, his record is pretty good.)

Calvin Law said...

RIP James Caan.

Finished Season 3 of The Boys, bit unwieldy a season in parts particularly towards the end but overall, another great entry. Cast ranking:

1. Antony Starr
2. Jensen Ackles
3. Karl Urban
4. Laz Alonso
5. Dominique McElligott
6. Erin Moriarty
7. Jack Quaid
8. Karen Fukuhara
9. Tomer Capone
10. Colby Minifie
11. Jessie T. Usher
12. Chace Crawford
13. Claudia Doumit

Anonymous said...

Speaking of Ackles, has anyone else here seen any episodes of Supernatural?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Anonymous: I've seen a fair bit of it a long time ago, and Ackles's performance was my favorite.

8000S said...

Louis: I watched Pale Flower a few days ago. Thoughts on Shinoda's direction and Masao Kosugi's cinematography in that movie? It looks he served as assistant director to Ozu before he became a director himself. Funnily enough, Ryo Ikebe plays the lead in Ozu's 1956 Early Spring.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Continuing my recent TV movie trend, I watched Tuesdays with Morrie. Nothing special honestly and a very cheesy movie as well (further accented by multitude of closeups and that grainy TV movie quality). However, it's carried by its two leads:

Azaria-4(Yes, this may be his best performance since Simpsons. Though he overuses that opened mouth facial expression, Azaria effectively portrays his character who becomes naturally more and more invested in the life lessons of his former university professor and as such turns into a more self-reflecting, fulfilled person, wholly earning his heartbreaking final scene)

Lemmon-4(This could have been a very schmaltzy, friendly philosophical old man performance, but not with actor like Lemmon being in charge. He adds some charm, gravitas and life experience to his every sentence and makes it truly special, while also not forgetting about the moments of Morrie's vulnerability and dispair as his health worsens. However, instead of making it look like antithetical to his optimistic character, Lemmon potrays it as a factor that adds something to Morrie and supports his earnest life philosophy. What could've been a trivial character frenzy, Lemmon turns into something certainly worthy of being one of his final performances.

8000S said...

Just by watching Pale Flower you can see that Ozu must have been quite the influence for Shinoda, since he also is a master at creating compositions.

Tony Kim said...

RIP James Caan and Tony Sirico.

Louis, do you give thoughts on clips from TV shows you haven't seen?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP Tony Sirico

BRAZINTERMA said...

I finished reading Killers of the Flower Moon and loved it. Scorsese has a great material on his hand.
As for my vision of the adaptation, I believe it will follow the same epic format as Gangs of New York and The Irishman.
I'm also very curious how Scorsese is going to transform DiCaprio's character from a supporting in the book to lead in the movie.

Michael Patison said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Michael Patison said...

Finally got around to watching King Richard. I found it to have some solid bones, but a script that can't decide when to move on and is too afraid to examine the man at any level approaching character study. The pacing is just painful and infuriating sometimes. Particularly, the entire section where Richard shops around for coaches while being completely unyielding could be cut in half and still tell the same story with the same lesson: he could be stubborn and controlling. The same sequence over and over again 3 or 4 times. He was stubborn and controlling, but look how much he loves his kids and wants them to succeed. Then it's all alright then, I guess. No need to examine that in, ostensibly, a biopic. Especially odd since he goes to a weird periphery toward the end with Venus's match only to reappear with an ending that went full-on inspirational (out of sync with other aspects of the movie) and clearly ended that way because the writer didn't know how to finish and gave up or something. Wouldn't it have made sense to push him there a little earlier and see how his kids' psyches were affected? Just a thought. Anyway, I found it both very good and very frustrating. 6.5/10

Smith: 4/4.5 (Probably the first time I've found him to in any way disappear in a role. Even so, I agree with Louis's review that he never goes far enough in portraying the negative aspects. I think this has some to do with the film's lack of examination of or catharsis for how toxic and controlling he could be, but Smith's work must bear some responsibility by not raising the question forcefully enough.)
Ellis: 3.5/4 (Her speech in the kitchen raises her from solid work to being really quite good. Just solid true support the rest of the time.)
Bernthal: 3/3.5 (Pretty enjoyable as just being such a supportive figure for the girls. Somebody else could've brought a greater sense of what drove him to continue working with them despite Richard being such a monumental asshole and self-centered prick. Even so, none of Bernthal's notes are wrong. They're just not as right as they could be.)
Neither of the girls is drawn specifically enough to have any thoughts.

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Shinoda's direction actually reminded more of Melville than Ozu interestingly enough. That in this is very much building this kind of criminal atmosphere with this intensity within the personalities present. In this though crafting a kind of, for a lack of a better word, "cool" about the proceedings even when it may be dealing with any kind of dark deeds. What is supported by Ozu I suppose is the calm of his direction and the careful focus upon the individual characters, within certain scenes restraint in terms of having actors have their moments so to speak.

Again where I really felt more so a Melville style was in the cinematography which is all about contrasts and really creating particularly dynamic shots that often emphasize the individual that is a bit less Ozu focused in many ways. Still some brilliant shots throughout in really creating such creative ways in expressing moments of intensity within the characters, and creating the atmosphere of the absolutely striking shots of contrasts between black and white, with powerful use of a pure blackness so long that works wonders in creating the darkness of the world that the central characters inhabit.

RIP Tony Sirico

Louis Morgan said...

Tony Kim:

I have in the past, though I'd rather not over do it, and I'd rather not do it for potential spoilery scenes of series that I might watch at some point.