Showing posts with label Peter O'Toole. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter O'Toole. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 April 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2004: Results

10. Daniel Wu in New Police Story - Wu makes for a pretty whiny and obnoxious villain. Not in a way that works either. 

Best Scene: Last "duel".
9. Cameron Bright in Birth - Bright delivers on the specific hollow note asked of him but never makes an impact beyond that. 

Best Scene: Being challenged.
8. Tim Meadows in Mean Girls - Meadows finds the right tone for the material hitting his comedic marks while still being believable. 

Best Scene: Riot control.
7. William Hurt in The Village - Hurt manages to deliver what dramatic heft he can from the tricky material even if it only allows him to go so far with it. 

Best Scene: Explaining his decision. 
6. Bud Cort in The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou - Cort gets the most out of his unusual role being both funny but also finding his own little arc as the surprisingly supportive "bond company stooge". 

Best Scene: Human being. 
5. Billy Bob Thornton in The Alamo - Thornton is the most interesting part of his film finding honesty in his deconstruction of man who knows he doesn't live up to his "living legend" status. 

Best Scene: Talking to Bowie. 
4. Nick Nolte in Clean - Nolte gives a very quiet and moving portrayal of man managing his own grief while also trying to honestly negotiate between family members dealing with the same loss. 
 
Best Scene: Important talk with his grandson.
3. Alfred Molina in Spider-Man 2 - Molina manages to thrive within the idea of the comic book villain while still providing essential grounding to provide balance. 

Best Scene: Finale. 
2. Peter O'Toole in Troy - O'Toole provides honest gravitas to tricky material and even more importantly emotional truth. 

Best Scene: Priam speaks to Achilles. 
1. Al Pacino in The Merchant of Venice - Good predictions Omar, Tony, Bryan, Shaggy, Tybalt, Tahmeed, Ytrewq, Luke, Robert, Harris, Maciej, Tim, RatedRStar, My top three of the year all are dealing with tricky material. O'Toole finding life in material that so many become stiff and awkward from. Hoffman finding genuine comedy even when so much of the attempted comedy around him is falling flat. Then Pacino who is in a slightly different situation in that he's dealing with Shakespeare however trying to accentuate a certain context many would argue was not intended in the original material. Pacino though excelling in this alternative approach and finding humanity within his "villain". Although I still settle on Hoffman. Because honestly being good in the bad comedy is a particularly rare occurrence and it's notable while I still found his film largely unfunny, I still laughed thanks to Hoffman. And really put say Dan Fogler, or even Jack Black into that role, I don't think they would've escaped the mediocrity let alone make the mediocrity into something that actually worked.  

Best Scene: "Do we not Bleed" 

Next: 1953 Lead

Friday, 24 April 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2004: Peter O'Toole in Troy

Peter O’Toole did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying King Priam in Troy. 

Troy tells the story of the Trojan war.

It is always fascinating with any sword and sandal film how easy it is to be a Quo Vadis instead of a Ben-Hur, a Samson and Delilah instead of a The Ten Commandments…a Troy instead of a Gladiator. Where the tone and aesthetic skewed just slightly one way or another makes it feel just silly dress up rather than any kind of captivating rendition of the type. As already noted Troy struggles within it falling into that dress up quality more frequently than not with the performances particularly frequently falling into that stilted attempt to sound almost too regal or legendary or whatever, it doesn’t work. The most notable exception to this situation is the legendary Peter O’Toole in the role of the Trojan King, the father of Paris (Orlando Bloom) and Hector (Eric Bana). Paris who creates the problem by taking Helen (Diane Kruger) from her actual husband, leading to the Greek army of Agamemnon (Brian Cox attempting more so the Ustinov/Laughton method for these things though I wouldn’t say he’s entirely successful as such) to invade Troy. Hector on the other hand is the great warrior and the responsible brother dealing with the weight of war. Priam stands then as the often stoic regal figure which O’Toole is more than happy to provide. O’Toole importantly just gives the utmost devotion to creating a genuine gravitas to the proceedings and doing his best to make you believe this world. O’Toole does achieve this as he finds the right combination between the regal but with enough of honestly a relaxed quality to not become that stiff quality a few of his co-stars struggle with. 

O’Toole is able to establish Priam as the old King with some wisdom but maybe too much of a connection to the old ways. O’Toole in a way presents a degree of a front as the wise King while we get more within certain moments where O’Toole thrives in bringing humanity within the legendary qualities so to speak. As we have O’Toole successfully delivering the words of Priam’s belief in the god Apollo where he can match the sort of elevated tone in every word of his delivery. O’Toole importantly makes it look easy which is in a way part of it, he doesn’t need to seem as though he’s dressing up as this man, he is this man. O’Toole takes it further however when we have the additional moments of the director’s cut where you see the love Priam has for his son Hector combined with his reason for that earlier devotion. When Priam tells of his prayer to Apollo that he believed saved the very young Hector’s life, O’Toole offers a quieter delivery where there is this strict sincerity of a father finding strength within that belief and most importantly the sense of the love for his son within the story. Contrasting that perhaps a bit, even though the film doesn’t do much with it, is O’Toole reactions during Paris’s one sided losing fight against Helen’s actual husband Menelaus (Brendan Gleeson), where we mostly see him trying to maintain that kingly grace yet when Paris shows obvious cowardice in the fight, O’Toole temporary disgust is just a great moment from the actor where you see most intense genuine emotion that Priam must keep down. An intriguing bit that sadly doesn’t get too much development beyond that moment. 

An even greater moment comes as a series of circumstances leads the greatest Greek warrior Achilles (Brad Pitt) to seek revenge for his cousin killed by Hector, as we see Achilles call out Hector for a one on one duel. Before Hector goes, knowing the likelihood of his fate, we get two moments from O’Toole where he manages to express the sides of the character in each. As first we have him wish for luck from Apollo essentially where O’Toole delivers it with the firm conviction of the caring king and devoted worshipper. Followed by a great bit of physical work where we see this quick, emotional and really instinctual extra moment where the man is shown behind the king. O’Toole in his hurried delivery bringing instead of the regal quality, the warmth and desperate love of a father one more time to a son he knows he’ll likely never speak to again. A notion that is only all the more powerful when Hector is not only killed by Achilles, but Achilles makes a mockery of his corpse by dragging Hector around on his chariot. This leads to not only O’Toole best scene but easily the best scene in the entirety of the film as Priam sneaks into the Greek encampment to ask Achilles for his son’s corpse to allow for a proper burial. 

O’Toole’s amazing in this scene bringing such a potent combination of qualities. As we sense the overriding grief beneath every word and his eyes carry the heartbreak of a man who would never fully recover from this loss. Yet Priam’s first action is to kiss Achilles’s hands, the hands that killed his son and supplicate himself. O’Toole finds such power in his quiet and nuanced delivery of each word of true wisdom and warmth as he appeals to Achilles’s humanity with such a pure sense of belief in the greater nature of man. When speaking of Achilles’s own father’s death it isn’t pester but rather connect with the sense of regret of an older man who has seen so much pain and death in the world. O’Toole manages to create even warmth to this killer of his son in the moment, finding still while projecting such striking grief and creating a true poignancy of the moment of the father believing in humanity in what should be in his moment of greatest doubt. O’Toole is able to combine such overwhelming vulnerability as so much of his physical work is of a man near a complete emotional breakdown in the way his lip quivers, however countered with the strength in his voice of a man who believes he will succeed in this task. It feels a wholly natural combination of a man empowered by his grief, which naturally is no easy idea to convey, yet that always feels convincing thanks to the greatness of O’Toole. I mean O’Toole is so great in the scene that Pitt, in maybe the least of his performances, even becomes decent in the scene almost seemingly in reaction to what O’Toole is delivering. It is extraordinary work in the scene from O’Toole particularly within a film that is filled with so much of it is overwrought and stiff. O’Toole wholly elevates that scene to think you’re watching a much better film than you are through his great talents as a performer. A talent that I would say in the theatrical cut in particular is underexploited outside of the scene, though the more than crumbs he gets from those deleted moments thankfully do allow O’Toole to elevate himself beyond a one scene wonder and reactor who knows how to sell the material. O’Toole elevates every moment he does have to create a captivating portrayal of the King as a king but also a man, with one extraordinary scene that is worthy of mention along with the very best of his illustrious career. 

Monday, 16 March 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2004

 And the Nominees Were Not:

Al Pacino in The Merchant of Venice

Peter O'Toole in Troy

William Hurt in The Village

Nick Nolte in Clean

Billy Bob Thornton in The Alamo

Predict These Five, Those Five Or Both.

Tim Meadows in Mean Girls

Daniel Wu in New Police Story

Cameron Bright in Birth

Alfred Molina in Spider-Man 2

Bud Cort in The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou

Sunday, 15 December 2013

Peter O' Toole R.I.P.


Wednesday, 13 July 2011

Best Actor 1969: Results

5. John Wayne in True Grit- Wayne's performance is an odd one with his strange choice to play the part as if he was Wallace Beery, which does not work particularly well for the role. This was certainly a career award since Wayne gave better performances before and after this one.
4. Peter O'Toole in Goodbye, Mr. Chips- O'Toole plays Chips rather differently than Robert Donat did, and a lot less effectively. Chips undergoes far fewer changes, and stays rather stiff throughout. I did think O'Toole was properly stiff, without being excessively boring, as well as has a few fairly effective moments such as his big speech.
3. Richard Burton in Anne of the Thousand Days- An interesting year where three nominated characters were again or before portrayed in Oscar nominated performances. Burton's performance is extremely over the top making every emotion known as much as possible. I can't say this is the wrong approach for King Henry entirely as some moments do work, but his overall effect is lacking.
2. Jon Voight in Midnight Cowboy- There was no question who was going to be in the top two slots this year the only way Wayne, O'Toole and Burton could have competed with these two is if their best performances were nominated this year, but all three of those performances were far, far from their best, the only real question was in what order the top two would be. Voight stands second, why, it is hard for me to say, because Voight is amazing in his performance of Joe Buck. His performance is a raw amazing performance, that could not be more effective if he tried. He gets every single moment of this challenging performance correct, I could not ask for more.
1. Dustin Hoffman in Midnight Cowboy- This was really hard to choose, and I will admit a tie seemed reasonable because the two of their performances depend on each other so well, and they achieve so much together. I finally went with Hoffman, why, well again it is hard for me to say, but Hoffman is incredible he takes a enormous amount of risks from his voice to his physical characterization but they all feel entirely natural, and only add to Enrico "Ratso" Rizzo as a character. Every moment he is on screen he is amazing, and his performance is simply one the most heartbreaking performances ever given.
Deserving Performances:
William Holden in The Wild Bunch

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

Best Actor 1969: Peter O'Toole in Goodbye, Mr. Chips

Peter O'Toole received his fourth Oscar nomination for portraying Arthur Chipping in Goodbye, Mr. Chips

This version of Goodbye, Mr. Chips is a musical version of the inspirational school teacher. Although I must say I was surprised by many of the changes that went far beyond the simple adding of some terrible songs.

Peter O'Toole depiction of Mr. Chips is very different from the Oscar winning depiction of the character by Robert Donat in the 1939 original. O'Toole Chips is even far more prim and proper, and this seems to be caused by the fact that he really is a rather stiff fellow more than the original Chips who was more of that way do to his shyness. Another change in this version, that really surprised me, was the fact that Chips is genuinely disliked by many of students who find him too harsh of a teacher. I felt this was genuinely surprising, and again this is a very very different Chips than the one everyone seemed to love of the 1939 original.

O'Toole portrays Chips in a very no nonsense way for a great majority of the film. He is a man of his principals and his morals, and certainly will not change them for anyone no matter how rich an investor who does not like him may be. O'Toole how proper portrayal is well handled, with a little humor from just how proper he is which comes out from time to time, although not enough for me to really like this portrayal. Chips still marries a independent woman named Katherine, but this time she is a singer played by actual singer Petula Clark. Their relationship technically seems slightly more natural because they do not get married in 5 second like Chips and Katharine in the original, but at the same time the chemistry between the two actors is not nearly as charming.

O'Toole and Clark have some nice moment together that is true, particularly in his scene where he states his love for her in his very dignified way, but it never becomes all that special, which probably can at least partially given to the fact that Clark is not really all that much of an actress, and much of the relationship falls on O'Toole's shoulders. All Clark really has to do is sing a song for each part of the relationship. O'Toole never really does all that much in this part, nor is he required to do all that much. Chips in this version strangely stays about the same at the beginning as he is in the end. I suppose his relationship with his students is a little better, and he is a tad less proper but really there is not all the much of a change shown in O'Toole's performance.

This is a consistent performance by O'Toole that does have a certain charm to it, even if it is not that much of one. His performance though does shine quite well in his few moments that he is given to shine. One such example being his reaction to hearing some tragic news, his reaction of disbelief and sadness is well handled and moving enough. His best single moment though comes from his final long speech about his retirement. It has the right passion and ease in this speech to suggest Chips' long history with the students, as well as showing how much they all have meant to him. His speech is the best part of the film really since the film does a poor job of establishing Chips' relationship to his students, therefore leaving basically it all to O'Toole, which O'Toole is able to convey quite well.

This performance although having its moments of strength, and it is technically consistent, it never becomes anything that special in any aspect. He really does not age until the last scene of the film, Chip's whole purpose in life seems to mainly be his relationship with his wife in this version, and that relationship is only sort of charming at best. There just is nothing that stands out here, except I suppose you get to hear O'Toole singing, and I suppose his uninspired approach to each song fits the uninspired lyrics and music of each song. This is not a bad performance at all, it is always technically good, but just like the film it really left me wanting far more than it delivered.

Saturday, 9 July 2011

Best Actor 1969

And the Nominees Were:

Dustin Hoffman in Midnight Cowboy

Jon Voight in Midnight Cowboy

John Wayne in True Grit

Richard Burton in Anne of the Thousand Days

Peter O'Toole in Goodbye, Mr. Chips

Wednesday, 30 March 2011

Best Actor 1980: Results

5. Jack Lemmon in Tribute- Lemmon's whole performance seems like Oscar baiting at its worst. It is hammy all the way, which might be okay if it worked, but it does not.
4. Robert Duvall in The Great Santini- I genuinely liked Duvall portrait of the abusive Bull Meechum. He created an interesting family dynamic through his performance, and never turned his character into a one dimensional figure which it easily could have been.
3. Peter O'Toole in The Stunt Man- I actually upped O'Toole rating because I thought about my main criticism, that I wanted more of him, which is hardly a criticism. His performance is pretty much a supporting one, and such is an extremely effective one. 
2. Robert De Niro in Raging Bull- De Niro performance is quite a remarkable achievement. He creates a fascinating complex portrait of a man who at heart is simple thug. He takes this thug though a realizes a complete human being, who is made by De Niro to be both frighteningly effective in his exterior anger and jealousy, and subtly honest in Lamotta's hidden sensitivity and vulnerability.
1. John Hurt in The Elephant Man- I can easily see the philosophy behind giving Hurt the win here. He is by far the most pleasant of the characters here, which is funny since it shows how low the other characters are since Merrick is such a nice man despite being given such a hindering deformity. Also Hurt's performance is brilliant in how much emotion he conveys through only his eyes and his voice, and also how honestly human he is as John Merrick.
Deserving Performances:
Donald Sutherland in Ordinary People

Friday, 25 March 2011

Best Actor 1980: Peter O'Toole in The Stunt Man

Peter O'Toole received his sixth Oscar nomination for portraying film director Eli Cross in The Stunt Man.

The Stunt Man is a story of a man who hides from the police acting as the stunt man to a manipulative domineering director. The film is certainly an interesting effort as well as entertaining at times, but it sort of loses its way in the second half. 
 
It is rather interesting that Timothy Hutton was nominated and won for his clearly leading role in the Supporting role for Ordinary People, yet Peter O'Toole here is really a supporting performance, although a domineering supporting performance. O'Toole's character knows the secret of the stunt man who is hiding from the police, and chooses to exploit him just as he exploits and manipulates the rest of his cast and crew. O'Toole dominates the film here from his first appearance as we only hear an audio comment on a random perspective. O'Toole's voice carries this certain kind of menace to it alone. There is a power to the man on that alone and from it you seem to sense the strength of the man's power and ambition. The ferocity within the man that is unlike anything you'd expect from a sensitive artist, rather he is perhaps some demonic overlord.

O'Toole performance is filled with charisma, honestly one of his most charismatic turns in his post-60's career, as we see the power of the man. O'Toole wields the personality beautifully and is extremely entertaining here. O'Toole has this infectious kind of mischief quality within his performance. He finds this fascinating kind of combination between a brutal darkness and a sense of fun with the material. O'Toole's eyes suggesting the coldest of killers while his delivering suggests something else. There is something within him as he directs his film. A kind of savoring quality in producing the manipulations. I particularly like one moment when his crew is talking about how the film will end up being cut in the end by the studio. Eli Cross though says he knows they will not cut his film, or else he will kill him. O'Toole delivers this line with such insane glee, that is both hilarious and brilliant in showing the intensity of the man's particular ego.

O'Toole said he based his performance on his Lawrence of Arabia director David Lean, and that is certainly interesting in terms of his perspective of the man who made him a star. O'Toole portrayal being that of an unrelenting egotistical dictator. There is though that sense of fun with it that might be in part of sending up his old collaborator. This as O'Toole plays the villain, but quite the entertaining villain in that sense. This as O'Toole performance doesn't quite simplify the director's nature. This as much as he is the terror, and quite the stunning terror in terms of how menacing he is in every word he speaks, even when speaking with just a rather unnerving calm. This as he O'Toole crafts a seeming contradiction in the devotion to his art while also seeming to essentially being a brute in his tactics in service towards his vision.

Eli Cross rules the film set within the film, while O'Toole rules the film itself. This as whenever he is onscreen it comes to life. This as O'Toole brings so much relish in showing the man getting so much out of crafting his vision. This as there is the genuine thrill of it all even beyond his moments of cruel dictatorship. O'Toole is fascinating in the way he really approaches any given scene as he actually treads around a singular note. This as he wields the darkness of the character. There are the moments where he speaks as though he's just having fun in messing with his actors, his crew and his stuntman. O'Toole creates a terrific enigma in this. This as he'll shade the moments of fun with a strict killer's intent suddenly within his face. O'Toole is wonderful by playing with every expectation. His delivery is particularly fascinating as his vocal adjustments is masterclass in how a slight change in emphasis makes a man seem a mad genius one moment and a hideous monster the next. O'Toole is utterly unpredictable here and it is beautiful. Although I wish this performance was in the film more, because whenever O'Toole is onscreen it works, that cannot be held against O'Toole who is great here and runs away with a truly great supporting turn. 

Thursday, 24 March 2011

Best Actor 1980

And the Nominees Were:

Peter O'Toole in The Stunt Man

Robert Duvall in The Great Santini

Robert De Niro in Raging Bull

John Hurt in The Elephant Man

Jack Lemmon in Tribute

Thursday, 30 December 2010

Best Actor 1982: Results

5. Jack Lemmon in Missing- Lemmon has a few moments of strong emotional impact, but the script calls for very little of him most of the time. Also I felt there was a lack in a natural flow in his performance.
4. Peter O'Toole in My Favorite Year- Peter O'Toole is good, and charming as a washed up movie star. His performance is not incredible but it is a nice funny and entertaining performance by O'Toole.
3. Dustin Hoffman in Tootsie- An incredibly enjoyable performance by Hoffman here. He makes sure every joke hits home with his terrific comedic timing. He makes the film also believable despite playing a man playing woman. Many scenes could have come off as just odd, by Hoffman makes them humorous, and also adds even more with the oddly poignant transformation caused by being a woman for awhile.
2. Ben Kingsley in Gandhi- Kingsley is quite good in the challenging role of Gandhi. He always seems completely authentic as Gandhi, in every scene and at every age. I never once doubted him as Gandhi, which is a spectacular achievement by Kingsley.
1. Paul Newman in The Verdict- Newman gives a full portrait of a man from being tired and broken down, but slowly growing toward a redemption of sorts. I personally finds this performance to be an outstanding and powerful performance which is incredibly true and authentic. A heartbreaking performance which may not have the technical challenges of Kingsley and Hoffman's characters, but Newman is the who made Galvin a truly empathetic man to me which is something a performance rarely does for me, but this one did completely.
Deserving Performances:
I decided to change other deserving performances since rewriting the performances in my ranking in my nominees is rather redundant. For the deserving performances this year I cannot think of any but I am open to suggestions.

Friday, 24 December 2010

Best Actor 1982: Peter O'Toole in My Favorite Year

Peter O'Toole received his seventh Oscar nomination for portraying washed up movie star Alan Swann in My Favorite Year.
My Favorite Year is unfortunately not that funny of a comedy the lead that is not O'Toole gets rather annoying, but there still is O'Toole to make the film enjoyable enough.

Peter O'Toole plays Alan Swann a Erroll Flynn esque movie star who is past his prime and allows his vices to get the best of him quite easily. Peter O'Toole as soon he walks on seem right for the part of Swann. He has the right cocky swagger even when he drunk, the right swagger of a over the top movie star. I like the fashion in which he played Swann as a drunk which is colorful since it is a comedy, but I do not think he over did it. I think his drunken mannerisms worked well, and he really did derive a good amount of humor from Swann's drunkenness.

Alan Swann when he is not drunk is looking for women. O'Toole really walks a careful line with Swann here, because Swann could very easily of been a completely obnoxious character, or seemed a little too slimy. But under O'Toole care Swann comes off a charming even if slimy man that simply is interesting to and rather entertaining to watch. I think he is entertaining to watch in just about every scene he tries to be so, the only problem is the film fails to focus on him enough, and spends a little too much time perhaps with the writer who looks after him played rather impressively by Mark Lynn-Baker, since O'Toole really is the film.

Swann has more than simply his entertaining antics though and has a little more to his character. A lack of a relationship with an estranged daughter that he finds trouble confronting. O'Toole adds the right poignancy to these quiet moments of Swann's without making these scenes seem disconnected with his scenes of antics. I will say the majority of his performance are his antics which are most entertaining at the end when he gets stage fright. O'Toole shows Swann anxiety with a nice amount of humor and delivers the "I'm not and actor, I'm a movie star line" as well as possible. He rounds out his performance with showing the swashbuckler actor part of Swann rather comically at the end, making O'Toole performance a nice comedic turn even if not amazing by any standards. 

Saturday, 18 December 2010

Best Actor 1982

And the Nominees Were:

Peter O'Toole in My Favorite Year

Paul Newman in The Verdict

Ben Kingsley in Gandhi 

Jack Lemmon in Missing

Dustin Hoffman in Tootsie

Monday, 8 November 2010

Best Actor 1962: Results

5. Burt Lancaster in Birdman of Alcatraz- Burt Lancaster does his best despite Robert Stroud being an incredibly oddly written character. Lancaster does succeed as much as he can with his material, and does show his charisma and star quality almost throughout the film.
4. Marcello Mastroianni in Divorce Italian Style- Mastroianni is downright hilarious, and creates a brilliant performance of deadpan brilliance. His performance is simple at times by always appropriately so, and always to maximize the hilarity of his performance.
3. Gregory Peck in To Kill A Mockingbird- Gregory Peck gives an especially effective and just about perfect performance as Atticus Finch. He is especially brilliant in his creation of Atticus which is absolutely magnificent. He also adds the right heart in his scenes with the children, and the right power and passion especially in his final speech at the trial.
2. Jack Lemmon in Days of Wine and Roses- Lemmon gives a brilliant and searing performance. Lemmon excels in all of his scenes, first carefully suggesting his alcoholism early on, but later having truly chilling moments involving his most troubled moments of alcoholism. A truly brilliant performance that is sometimes hard to watch simply because he is so good.
1. Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia- Peter O'Toole gives a performance of true greatness as Lawrence. He not only holds interest throughout his long running film, but he also shows an incredible unique portrait of a fascinating man. His transition of all forms are brilliantly shown, and he gives a performance of utter brilliance. O'Toole is absolutely perfect in every moment of his incredible performance, that I think is one of the greatest, and certainly O'Toole's best.

Deserving Performances:
James Mason in Lolita

Sunday, 7 November 2010

Best Actor 1962: Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia

Peter O'Toole received his first Oscar nomination for portraying T.E. Lawrence in Lawrence of Arabia.

Lawrence of Arabia is simply a fantastic film, a true epic, that is both a spectacular sight to behold, but also is brilliantly written, showing the interesting relationships between nations, and creating incredibly complex and memorable characters. On an interesting Oscar related side note this film has  not only Peter O'Toole who has the most unsuccessful Best Actor Nominations but also Claude Rains and Arthur Kennedy who share the most unsuccessful supporting actor Oscar nominations.   

Peter O'Toole seemed to be tailor made to play Lawrence, if it was not for their height difference I would say O'Toole is almost a dead ringer for the real Lawrence in this film. Like Gregory Peck from this year, O'Toole from the creation of the part just seems perfect for the part. I never for a moment question him as Lawrence, and this is something that is very good for his performance. He never needs to try to convince me he is Lawrence and merely is this saves time for O'Toole in a way, and adds no unneeded distractions in his performance such as a voice or mannerisms. Again like Gregory Peck seemed to be the only person who could be Atticus Finch, and only Peter O'Toole could really be T.E. Lawrence, which is a true achievement since unlike Atticus Finch, Lawrence was a real person.

Peter O'Toole also does something that seems rather simple in this part, but is essential to the success of the film. That is he is always completely watchable for the entire length of this very long film. His performance always remains interesting throughout the film, never loses his charisma or energy for a moment. This is very much needed for a long epic such as this, since O'Toole stays watchable he and the film never become at all boring, or tiresome, and the film stays interesting for its whole running time. O'Toole stays watchable therefore he stays as a character you can follow throughout this gigantic epic in a very similar way one could follow Vivien Leigh through Gone With The Wind, which is a true achievement. 

Peter O'Toole fulfills the role of a lead in an epic completely but his role is not that of a simple hero in anyway. O'Toole shows the various aspects of Lawrence brilliantly despite how strange and complicated some aspects of the character can be. O'Toole is particularly effective in showing Lawrence and his transformations throughout the film which are many and many different complications. One of his transformation is his original position of a fairly unassuming solider, who follows his orders and goes deep into the desert. He is a rather plain spoken man who wishes to learn and O'Toole early shows the proper earnestness and understanding of Lawrence as he finds out more about the Arab people. He shows both a great interest in their ways but later and distaste when his original guide is killed simply because the guide drank from the wrong water well. O'Toole mixes Lawrence feeling well, it seems fairly simple at times, but O'Toole is also the viewers guide into this life and O'Toole excels in this spectacularly well.

Lawrence though soon gains more knowledge of the Arabs, and transitions from an outsider to not one of them but something different. He becomes of Arabia but not an Arab in a odd but fascinating fashion. He gains their trust through his ability, and his connection with them. O'Toole here creates another presence that is larger than life. His gain in confidence and control is shown to have always been there by O'Toole and something that finally needed a chance to be realized. He becomes a hero of sorts to the Arabs, because of his command and charisma. It is certainly a challenge for O'Toole to have the right charisma and power in his performance but he does. I never questioned his ability to calm and lead the people who were incredibly energetic, and very much unsubdued. O'Toole is able to prove this great ability of Lawrence without absolutely no faults which is simply incredible.

O'Toole is fascinating also in showing an aspect of Lawrence that the film did not even need to draw attention but it does, and adds greatly to the character of Lawrence. This is the idea of Lawrence's masochism at first that slowly turns into sadism. The film does not draw that much attention to the film but it is shown with incredibly subtlety by O'Toole, the film overtly mentions briefly but the transition is all up tot O'Toole. Early on he shows his ability to hold a match for long, and his slight strange pleasure he clearly shows in his face when he blows out his match.

He changes over the film to sadism, a sadism that grows within in Lawrence, which O'Toole shows carefully and all too effectively. His pleasure he shows when he executes a friend of his is chilling because O'Toole shows it with complete naturalism. His love of killing grows and O'Toole is coldly realistic despite this oddity of Lawrence especially in his scene where he tells the General that he enjoyed killing. It is truly fascinating because O'Toole does not turn him into a psychopath but rather a man who simply gets an odd pleasure from killing which seems far more chilling than if he was just a psychopath. O'Toole is particularly haunting in his revenge scene where the purest brutality of Lawrence comes out when he calls for no prisoners. A that whole sequence O'Toole is truly freighting showing how Lawrence has changed and how his enjoyment of causing pain had grown to such a point.

O'Toole still has one last point of his performance which is the most compelling and essential. That is Lawrence's growing madness of sorts. Not the traditional madness of going insane or his sadism, but his growth of his belief that he is some sort of savior to the Arab people. O'Toole brilliantly suggests this early by Lawrence's confidence in his plans and his abilities. He brilliantly leads this to his own view of himself growing larger and larger in his eyes. He is especially strong because Lawrence starts fairly unsure at the first moment. He grows though but not completely after an early victory. But he shows both a confidence and fear when he announces his victory to his command. He shows that Lawrence seems partially afraid and partially astounded by what he has done and what he is becoming. Lawrence even more so develops his own image of being this odd savior to these people. O'Toole excels in showing Lawrence's larger than life dementia of sorts, something that seems completely odd and impossible, but isn't because O'Toole makes it so. He becomes a man of complete power and control, over these people, a man who believes many serve his cause simply because he is the one in charge. This aspect of his performance is awe inspiring to behold, and simple magnificent.

Here is a performance that is simply perfect, yet all too incredible because Lawrence is a complex character, one of the most complex in a film. O'Toole finds the right tone, the right madness, and the right reality for every aspect of Lawrence's psyche. O'Toole performance is one that I could write and write about because there is simply so much to it. Every single scene O'Toole shows such magnificence in his performance, that only the greatest of performances can have. O'Toole never seems false or strange but real, and makes Lawrence completely as Lawrence should be. O'Toole's performance has so much to it that I could not really even described completely everything there is to his performance. I did not even mention many of his incredible individual scenes showing Lawrence's history with Ali (Omar Sharif),or spectacular single scenes such as when he fakes the proper British mannerisms in an odd attempt to fit in with the world where he is not more than a man. This is performance that I find is something that is truly awesome to behold. O'Toole performance is one that I believe should be considered even more legendary than it is, it is that great and perfect in my opinion.