5. George Chakiris in West Side Story- He dances well, and sings okay, but he certainly acts very poorly.
4. Peter Falk in A Pocketful of Miracles- Falk is the only good thing about the movie, and he tries his best to be funny but his performance just is pushed too much in the background to over come the terrible film he is in.
3. George C. Scott in The Hustler- Scott is brilliant as Burt showing his manipulations in a brilliantly, realistically, and as cruelly effective as possible. He never ever false as Burt and that is what makes his performance all the more effective.
2. Jackie Gleason in The Hustler- Gleason gives a great performance through
a relatively simple character by the fantastic way he creates something
legendary out of simply playing pool.
1. Montgomery Clift in Judgment At Nuremberg- Clift has one scene and makes
more than the most of it. He creates a true victim in his
characterization of this man who was severely mistreated by the Nazis.
His powerful performance creates the strongest scene in the film.
Showing posts with label George Chakiris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Chakiris. Show all posts
Friday, 27 August 2010
Wednesday, 25 August 2010
Best Supporting Actor 1961: George Chakiris in West Side Story
George Chakiris won an Oscar from his only nomination for portraying Bernardo, leader of the sharks, in West Side Story.
West Side Story is a film that I will admit holds my interest well watching it, even though there are many clear flaws in the film.
George Chakiris does two things well enough in the film, which I will say before I get to everything he does not do so well. He dances well he is right on step, and does not do anything wrong with that. Also he sings well enough, not amazingly but he is fine. Now how about his acting, well that is where the problems come from. Chakiris plays the leader of the Sharks, a rather cockey man, who hates the Jets and its members,. He has problems with America and Americans. This is the way Bernado is written and that is all Chakiris attempts for. He does nothing to even try to show more of Bernado than what is written, but again this is not his biggest problem.
His biggest problem is that he fails even to meet the written requirements of Bernado's character. He never seems really cocky to me, more of someone trying to be so. Which is surprising that the was unable to do something so simply as that. Now he never is believable in any other way such as his hatred of the Jets, he just does not really seem believable as a gang leader. He is never interesting or even really entertaining, the biggest thing which contributes to this is his incredibly dull line readings. Everything he says is just boringly said by him with little emotion shown even in scenes which are suppose to be incredibly intense. He never satisfies the needs of the part even, which to tell you the truth is not very much, and even if he did satisfy the needs of the part he still would be an undeserving winner. He adds nothing to the part and cannot even fulfill it, clearly a performance I do not like. He only dances well and sings fine that's it.
West Side Story is a film that I will admit holds my interest well watching it, even though there are many clear flaws in the film.
George Chakiris does two things well enough in the film, which I will say before I get to everything he does not do so well. He dances well he is right on step, and does not do anything wrong with that. Also he sings well enough, not amazingly but he is fine. Now how about his acting, well that is where the problems come from. Chakiris plays the leader of the Sharks, a rather cockey man, who hates the Jets and its members,. He has problems with America and Americans. This is the way Bernado is written and that is all Chakiris attempts for. He does nothing to even try to show more of Bernado than what is written, but again this is not his biggest problem.
His biggest problem is that he fails even to meet the written requirements of Bernado's character. He never seems really cocky to me, more of someone trying to be so. Which is surprising that the was unable to do something so simply as that. Now he never is believable in any other way such as his hatred of the Jets, he just does not really seem believable as a gang leader. He is never interesting or even really entertaining, the biggest thing which contributes to this is his incredibly dull line readings. Everything he says is just boringly said by him with little emotion shown even in scenes which are suppose to be incredibly intense. He never satisfies the needs of the part even, which to tell you the truth is not very much, and even if he did satisfy the needs of the part he still would be an undeserving winner. He adds nothing to the part and cannot even fulfill it, clearly a performance I do not like. He only dances well and sings fine that's it.
Labels:
1961 Best Supporting Actor,
George Chakiris,
oscar
Tuesday, 24 August 2010
Best Supporting Actor 1961
And the Nominees Were:
Montgomery Clift in Judgment At Nuremberg
Peter Falk in Pocketful of Miracles
George Chakiris in West Side Story
Jackie Gleason in The Hustler
George C. Scott in The Hustler
Who do you pick? What do predict my ranking will be?
Montgomery Clift in Judgment At Nuremberg
Peter Falk in Pocketful of Miracles
George Chakiris in West Side Story
Jackie Gleason in The Hustler
George C. Scott in The Hustler
Who do you pick? What do predict my ranking will be?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






