Showing posts with label Christoph Waltz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christoph Waltz. Show all posts

Saturday, 11 May 2019

Alternate Best Actor 2013: Results

10. Alden Ehrenreich in Beautiful Creatures - Ehrenreich brings such a genuine charm and sincerity in his work that he manages to make up for a mostly bland part. 

Best Scene: The course of his life.
9. Domhnall Gleeson in About Time - Gleeson gives an appropriately charming and endearing turn that manages to balance the film's tone nicely.

Best Scene: Final talk with dad.
8. Toni Servillo in The Great Beauty - Although I had no great affection for his film, Servillo managed to carry me through it in his charming and reflective portrayal of a man trying to find meaning in hollow extravagance.

Best Scene: Finding a great beauty.
7. Sol Kyung-gu in Hope - Although somewhat underused by the film he's in, Sol does deliver in granting the appropriate heartbreak and anger in a father's reaction to a true horror being inflicted upon his family.

Best Scene: Shifting his daughter to another room. 
6. Terence Stamp in Song For Marion - Stamp delivers, even when his film gets a bit corny, offering a genuine portrayal of grief that rises above his material.

Best Scene: "Goodnight My Angel"
5. Ethan Hawke in Before Midnight - Hawke gives an excellent turn continuing naturally in his "maturation"  of Jesse especially in how that is reflected with his chemistry with Julie Delpy as Celine.

Best Scene: Hotel room fight.
4. Simon Pegg in The World's End - Pegg delivers an overtly hilarious performance as a man still living as a high school rebel, though is equally heartbreaking in revealing the sad truth of such a state.

Best Scene: Nothing got better.
3. Christian Bale in Out of the Furnace - Bale gives perhaps his quietest turn and one of his most powerful as a man defined by hardship essentially fulfilling a personal duty through revenge. 

Best Scene: Listening to the tape.
2. Christoph Waltz in The Zero Theorem - Waltz gives a turn completely unlike his Oscar winning ones, through his moving depiction of  of the struggle of an extreme introvert while maintaining the humanity needed for the film's surreal journey.

Best Scene: Turning Down Bainsley's Offer.
1. Masaharu Fukuyama in Like Father. Like Son - Good predictions Michael Patison, Charles H., Luke and Tahmeed. Fukuyama gives a great naturalistic turn that manages to give such a restrained yet truly poignant portrayal of a father coming to term with his faults through some very unlikely circumstances.

Best Scene: Reuniting with his son.
Updated Overall

Next: Supporting 2013

Monday, 25 March 2019

Alternate Best Actor 2013: Christoph Waltz in The Zero Theorem

Christoph Waltz did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Qohen Leth in The Zero Theorem.

The Zero Theorem is a return for Terry Gilliam to a world of overwhelming nonsensical bureaucracy, and for me, a return to form. This time through the story of a loner programmer given a most unusual task. A film I've found rather compelling both times I've watched it, strangely enough suffering from the flu while doing so both times. Of course I can't say for sure whether that aided or hindered the experience each time, or if in fact was somehow the cause of the illness...food for thought.

Christoph Waltz is an actor who as much as he was embraced by mainstream Hollywood by winning an Oscar in his breakthrough role, then won a second only three years later. As notable of an achievement as that is, it did not lead Waltz to avoid being used as most international performers are, which is that of the villain. Although to be fair that is where Waltz's breakout came from, however these roles were far thinner than his Oscar winning role of Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds. One notable exception to this is here, where he not only doesn't play the villain, he has the chance to solely lead a film. Most importantly though it grants Waltz a chance to show off his range outside of flamboyant foreigners capable of great violence, though on very different parts of the moral spectrum. Here though Waltz must call upon a different aspect of his talent as the part of Qohen Leth is that of the quiet programmer, who unlike Waltz's roles that became his claims to fame, is an extremely reserved man who would rather stay home at all times, and have as little interaction with others as possible. A man who rather hideaway in his former monastery apartment rather than live out in the cold alienating world of this future.

Waltz's performance is fittingly a great departure as he changes his physicality within the role, rather than the outgoing gestures of his Quentin Tarantino collaborations. Waltz internalizes his work much more with his often furrowed brow of a man always trying to avoid eye contact with those around him, and his meek walk of a man trying to avoid notice. Waltz effectively establishes this precarious place of Qohen as a man trying so hard to not be part of the world around him, and makes sense of this man. This man who speaks in pluralities of "we" rather than I. A logic that Waltz brings to life brilliantly as again this painful modesty of a man who can't even bring up the courage to speak as one, deflecting towards any feelings or ideas as a group. Although of course the man wants to avoid actually interacting with a group, Waltz is fantastic in finding the difficult comfort the man has in these statements of the we, that avoids both being himself, but also avoids being part of anything. He makes a man completely isolated yet wholly without an individualism, which is a fascinating juxtaposition that Waltz brings a remarkable life to.

What Waltz does in his establishment of Qohen is that he is able to humanize a character that could have been a grotesque series of tics. Waltz though manages to find essentially the logic behind every strange little mannerism of the man. The mannerisms are never perfunctory, as he manages to create not only that logic to them, but an emotional truth within. Yes they are farfetched in a certain sense, however Waltz breathes into them a real sense of the cause of each. The causes being these methods of the man to disconnect himself essentially from the experience of life. Waltz offers this as not something hollow, but rather with a genuine pathos. A inherent sadness that Waltz brings to his eyes, that carries itself a man deeply wounded at some point in his experience, which we never fully are told the circumstances of. Waltz realizes this struggle as something quite tangible that offers the needed soul within the film, to grant the film a purpose within the character of Qohen. This is before Qohen is given the most unusual task by management (Matt Damon), to finish a theorem that is meant to prove that life is meaningless.

Now this performance is still a lead in a Terry Gilliam so there is a matter of balance to be maintained with the purposefully mad tone he brings to the proceedings. A tone that Waltz masters with his performance that is able to both create an honest character within Qohen as a man, while having just the right bit of color essentially within his work as he interacts with the world. This is as he finds a certain level of humor in his work, which actually a facet of all of Waltz's successful performances that I've seen, although here he very much delivers them within still the expression of this man's interactions with the world around him. In his scenes with his the less sympathetic forces of the world including management, as well as the majority of the other company workers, Waltz's delivers wonderful bit of unease of this experience. A man whose very being seems shaken by every bit of interaction as this horrible strain. Waltz manages to even within the specific nature of the character offer just enough of the right reality, to find the befuddling humor within certain circumstances of technically great anxiety. This is just a welcome facet of Waltz's work, but what stays with me about this performance is actually the most human elements within it.

This is found through the two central relationships within the film, the first being with the beautiful Bainsley (Melanie Thierry) who seems perhaps a little too eager to begin a sexual relationship with him, though through virtual reality. Waltz though is again fantastic in showing the struggle within the reticence within Qohen even with her apparent aggressive affection. This is worn away of course, and Waltz though is great by not playing it as this overt lust within these scenes. He rather grants the sense of Qohen opening himself, still timid in his manner, but with just a bit of extroversion as he finally looks and interacts with her with a real appreciation for another person. This also comes when she questions a very specific habit of Qohen's which is to habitually wait for a single phone call that he finally explains. This explanation being a highlight of Waltz as an actor as he brings such a painful passion and even inspiration within his eyes as he explains that he waits for a phone call that will give him the meaning of life. Waltz is heartbreaking as this explanation, as delusional as it may seem, he grants such a terrible sincerity of a man who has this desperation need for answers and so firmly believes they will all be answered in a single message.

Unfortunately for Qohen, he discovers Bainsley seemingly to be just a tool of management to keep him happy while he finishes the project. The other relationship though is in his stranger, pseudo fatherly relationship with a physically unwell young intern sent to help him, Bob (Lucas Hedges), who doesn't fully know what to make of Qohen. Waltz's work in these moments though is excellent in again portraying the state of Qohen when he is challenged a bit, as Bob both questions and supports the loner. Waltz has some especially important moments in his work where he is allowed to discuss his own past, including the relationship with his wife. This description being a brilliant bit of acting by Waltz as he manages to be completely unemotional in his delivery of the destruction of apparently the love of his life, while in his eyes still showing this sense of an unhealed wound, of a man whose shut off himself to avoid any further pain. I love the moment of empathy Waltz again slowly reveals within Qohen for the physically troubled young man, that is without hesitation even if still modest. We see this challenge though against Qohen's personal protections, that Waltz poignantly reveals.

An even greater one comes as Bainsley appears speaking of genuine affection for Qohen, and offering him a way outd. Waltz only says a few words, however finds a real power within this silence and frankly anguish in the man weighing this love, against his delusions and essentially the fear of this unknown. Waltz again does so much within the minor detail of his expression, portraying so well the pain of a man who tries to internalize everything. His mistakes though come to ahead as he finds himself lost within the virtual world, and faced with an uncaring management. Waltz is outstanding in this scene again of finally unleashing his anguish more forwardly, as this intense despondency as he questions trying to prove that life is trivial. Unfortunately for him, management has already determined this based on Qohen refusing to live his life based on the need for his "meaning of life" phone call that would never come. In the end though Qohen finds some serenity within technically a false reality, but it is an amazing moment for Waltz. As in this scene he loses the physical restraints to show this man embracing his existence with a delight and unrestrained splendor, even if it is perhaps all now an illusion. This is a great performance by Christoph Waltz as he finds the essential humanity within this more surreal journey, showing another facet of his talent and range, that hopefully he'll be able to explore again sometime soon.

Tuesday, 26 February 2019

Alternate Best Actor 2013

And the Nominees Were Not:

Toni Servillo in The Great Beauty

Domhnall Gleeson in About Time

Christoph Waltz in The Zero Theorem

Simon Pegg in The World's End (feat. Shaun of the Dead/Hot Fuzz)  

Sol Kyung-gu in Hope

Predict these five or those five, or both:

Alden Ehrenreich in Beautiful Creatures

Ethan Hawke in Before Midnight

Christian Bale in Out of the Furnace 

Terence Stamp in Song for Marion

Masaharu Fukuyama in Like Father, Like Son

Sunday, 13 January 2013

Best Supporting Actor 2012: Christoph Waltz in Django Unchained

Christoph Waltz won his second Oscar from his second nomination for portraying Doctor King Schultz in Django Unchained.

Django Unchained is an entertaining, although overlong film, about a German bounty hunter who teams up to to bounty hunt with a slave Django (Jamie Foxx), and later to rescue Django's wife who is in possession of a wealthy plantation owner Calvin Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio).

It certainly is questionable if Christoph Waltz really is supporting here. This is not a completely closed case that he is either though in that there is a clear lead of Jamie Foxx as Django, there are many scenes without Schultz, and he clearly ends up not being the main character by the end of the film. That being said though he still has considerable screen time, he is in most scenes for a great deal of the film, as well as he pretty much commands most scenes that he is in though that really has a lot to with the quality of Waltz's performance. I would say that really I would not complain all that much if he were placed in either category.

There is a criticism of Waltz here that could be made, although I have not heard it or read it so far, that he is playing too much of a similar character to that of Hans Landa in Inglorious Basterds also directed by Quentin Tarantino. Both are intelligent and very suave Germans, but the key difference between the two is Hans Landa is quite evil and King Schultz is actually the hero of the film. Also Waltz playing a similar character does not diminish this performance in the least as who else could give this performance other than Waltz? The effort of Waltz in each role is equal and the simple truth is Waltz could have played this role first therefore such an argument never would be made.

Waltz is just brilliant from his first scene where he procures Django from two slavers first in attempted negotiation. Waltz's way with words is just fabulous and it perfectly accentuates the superiority of his character's intelligence in such an easy fashion. He also did this as Hans Landa, but where as Hans Landa he portrayed it as just one of his methods of attack on the psyche of his opponent, as Schultz he portrays with a lighter touch showing it to be merely the way Schultz is without any malice attached. Waltz shows that with Schultz his manner and style really is just the way he is, and that it doesn't have anything to do with any greater scheme like it would be with Landa.

Waltz is terrific in his creation of the style of Schultz though which is both very easy going in the way he speaks each and every word in a meticulous fashion, but at the same time Waltz brings across the quick incisive method that Schultz also does use when it comes to killing. In the first scene he brilliantly goes along in his way of speaking way above the slavers head, which Waltz does with style that is both entertaining but effective in creating Schultz as a character. When the slavers finally have had enough of him though he quickly dispatches them. Waltz is excellent because he barely shows Schultz as that violent, despite killing a man, because he still goes back to being so civil right after the fact.

In this performance Waltz absolutely makes the style of Schultz work completely without it seeming bizarre, nor stopping him from being a heroic character within the film. In every scene he is in Waltz makes it work through a great deal of charm he has, that this time does not have a hint of slime this time his smile tends to be genuine. Even when Schultz kills Waltz does this well by making it clear that Schultz has no hesitations really knowing that who is killing are bad men, therefore does not need to second guess himself, and his portrayal of his stance is properly honest so we do not second guess him either.

Unlike with Hans Landa who the audience were really kept at a distance from in any part of his plan fearing them more than anything, Waltz here is outstanding in the way he loses that coldness found in Landa instead creating a warmth within Schultz that allows us to be really in on his plans instead. Waltz makes it so when Schultz wins over on the slavers we can easily enjoy the victory right with through his welcoming performance here. Every one of his scenes where he talks himself out of a problem early on in the film is just terrific, and despite doing it several times Waltz makes each and everyone of these scenes very entertaining without feeling repetitive in the slightest.

Another reason I love this performance is how Waltz works with Jamie Foxx in the film. Jamie Foxx goes for basically a man with no name attempt in the vein of Clint Eastwood or Lee Van Cleef, or maybe that is what Quentin Tarantino wanted from the character, either way though it does not quite work because Foxx is not Eastwood or Van Cleef. The weakness of the leading man does not matter though because Christoph Waltz is there to save the day. Whenever Foxx could allow the film to falter due to his not nearly compelling enough performance, Waltz steps in and instantly energizes the scene with his wonderful presence. Not a single scene while Waltz is around falters because Waltz simply through his extremely entertaining performance stops them from doing so.

Waltz's domination of the scenes between Django and Schultz might sound like it would not work as Django is suppose to be lead. It works though because Waltz creates the relationship between the two as a bit of a mentor apprentice sort of relationship. In their scenes together Waltz is very good in making Schultz a gentle teacher to Django as both a technical advisory in the ways of the Bounty hunter, but also an encouraging factor that works quite well that creates a certain friendship that works well. Foxx's performance style of basically of being a modern action hero in this period is saved, for the most part, because Waltz lightens up as well as energizes everyone one of their scenes together that really saves the film.

Later on in the film when they go to save Django's wife Schultz takes a little bit of a back seat to the craziness of Calvin Candie and his head slave Stephen (Samuel L. Jackson) as the chief villains of the film. This is not Waltz's fault by any means but in certain scenes like one where Calvin orders a slave to be torn apart by dogs Schultz is regulated to the background. Still Waltz is very good and every chance he does have to to chime in he again infuses life into the picture, and he certainly makes sure that we do not forget him for a moment. Also very important through his short reactions Waltz very much shows a certain disgust brewing over the horrible behavior of the slave holder that is extremely well handled by Waltz that sets up Schultz's later actions.

Also when I say Waltz takes a back seat it is only brief, basically just on their way to Candieland. Waltz has a very good scene with Django's wife Broomhilda that is very amusing thanks to Waltz's expert delivery. Even better though is the scene where they all have dinner. DiCaprio, Jackson, and Waltz are just terrific here as they all play together. They are hilarious the way they trade the barbs with DiCaprio portraying Calvin's attempted sophistication, Jackson portraying Stephen purposeful lack of sophistication, and Waltz portraying honest sophistication. They work together just perfectly and make the scene work extremely well the way they just make entertaining but also the way Waltz sets up the ruse Schultz is playing all the while Stephen is detecting the ruse.

I will say this paragraph covers the severe SPOILERS of the film. After the ruse is detected and Schultz is forced to do things Calvin's way Waltz is terrific in subtle showing the slow moral anger that builds in Schultz. Waltz is outstanding in his last scene as Waltz finally shows Schultz let lose with his disgust against what he was repressing beforehand, and it is a powerful moment for the end of his performance. He though still ends his performance so brilliantly by showing his charm just one more time before he exits the film. I must say how good he is makes the last part of the film much harder to get through than it should have been. I have never missed a character more in a film this year than Schultz and the credit needs to go to Waltz for doing so.

Christoph Waltz is amazing because he not only made his character exceedingly entertaining but as well even towed along Jamie Foxx to make his performance tolerable. He honestly is the man who makes the entire film work. Without him the film could easily could have devolved into just an abundance of violence lacking the charm and fun necessary for the film. I would say this is particularly true as I do feel that the ending of the film does devolve into that a bit, and Waltz is absent from the conclusion. All I can say is this is just a brilliant performance as Christoph Waltz pulls such a terrific character that does not feel for a moment like he is just coasting on his previous work. All I can really say that lead or supporting this just a great performance either way, and simply is either one of the best lead or supporting performances of the year.

Thursday, 10 January 2013

Best Supporting Actor 2012

And the Nominees Are:

Alan Arkin in Argo

Philip Seymour Hoffman in The Master

Tommy Lee Jones in Lincoln

Robert De Niro in Silver Linings Playbook

Christoph Waltz in Django Unchained 

Wednesday, 7 December 2011

Best Supporting Actor 2009: Results

5. Stanley Tucci in The Lovely Bones- Tucci mostly just tries to be creepy which he does do well enough. His performance though lacks the visceral power a performance like this should have.
4. Christopher Plummer in The Last Station- Plummer although certainly competent never manages to make anything special out of Tolstoy.
3. Matt Damon in Invictus- This might seem like a surprise position but out of the bottom three Damon does succeed the most in his particular role. He brings the passion and spirit that the story needs.
2. Woody Harrelson in The Messenger- Harrlson gives an intense and powerful emotional performance when he is in uniform, but when out of it he relies  a little bit too much on his usual style.
1. Christoph Waltz in Inglourious Basterds- Waltz simply gives a great memorable villainous performance that manages to be both humorous and chilling, and succeeds with every single challenge found in the role.
Deserving Performances:
Michael Fassbender in Inglourious Basterds

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

Best Supporting Actor 2009: Christoph Waltz in Inglourious Basterds

Christoph Waltz won his Oscar from his first nomination for portraying Colonel Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds.

Inglorious Basterds details various going ons in occupied Nazi France.

Christoph Waltz portrays the Nazi S.S. officer Hans Landa who has the nickname the "Jew Hunter" due to his ability to find Jewish people hiding from the Nazis. This is most certainly a juicy villain role that Waltz instantly sinks his teeth into his role from his first scene where he interrogates a French farmer about the whereabouts of a Jewish family who is believed to be in hiding. It is a long drawn out scene but Waltz is brilliant as he displays Hans Landa's unique character, as well as Hans' methods as a detective.

Christoph Waltz in this first scene shows an odd sort of charisma in his performance that is simply perfect for the role of Hans Landa. It is not that he makes Landa likable really but there is an undeniable magnetic quality to his performance. He dominates the screen in every scene showing Hans Landa to be a man who is always in charge no matter what the situation might be. Waltz amplifies Landa's power by always having the utmost assurance in his performance.

What I really like about his performance though is shown best in his first scene as he so well realizes the sophistication and intelligence in Landa. He is brilliant in simply the way he works through the scene as he kindly approaches the farmer with certainly with a sense of superiority, but with a certain gentleness and calmness. Underneath the calm exterior Waltz always shows Landa almost breaks down the farmer with his almost slight and only somewhat related questions.

It would have been exceedingly easy to handle this part of his performance incorrectly. The whole style of Landa frankly with just slight fault could have made his opening interrogation seem implausible. Waltz absolutely nails it an makes the interrogation appropriately intense. He is especially effective in his final scene where he shows the true business side of Landa which is chilling especially in contrast to his earlier approach. Waltz is brilliant leaving absolute no doubt about Landa's abilities.

Waltz actually is not in the film for a great deal of time after the first scene but his impact from his first scene is not forgotten for a moment making his time of return have the impact it should. He stands as a powerful presence through the whole second half of the film. Waltz not only manages to keep Landa an imposing figure in each of scenes. What really makes him threatening though is Waltz manages to keep Landa somewhat ambiguous in his exact motives.

The final scenes of his film there is a rather large decision made by Landa that really could have come across as rather far-fetched. Waltz though throughout managed to establish Landa as more than just an evil Nazi but rather a pompous superior opportunist making his final decisions completely logical in the end. Waltz manages to bring this depth to Landa with a great ease, despite the fact the film gives him only a little time to develop this facet of the character.

If one were to complain about this performance at all it would be he can be somewhat self indulgent in his delivery of the line "Bingo" but I would say that even that actually works within his characterization of Landa who is self indulgent in his belief in his own superiority. Waltz simply gives a great memorable villainous performance that manages to be both humorous and chilling, and succeeds with every single challenge found in the role.

Thursday, 1 December 2011

Best Supporting Actor 2009

And the Nominees Were:

Woody Harrelson in The Messenger 

Matt Damon in Invictus

Christoph Waltz in Inglorious Basterds

Christopher Plummer in The Last Station

Stanley Tucci in The Lovely Bones