Kieran Culkin received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Benjamin "Benji" Kaplan in A Real Pain.
A Real Pain tells the story of two cousins going to visit the homeland of their deceased grandmother in Poland.
Kieran Culkin recently won an Emmy for playing Roman Roy, a man who often says inappropriate things to cover up his deep rooted trauma in Succession. While Culkin here plays a man who often says inappropriate things to cover up his deep rooted trauma, but this time he's called Benji. The differences are slightly more in that Benji is decidedly poor (or perhaps just where Roman would be if he didn't have a rich father) and he's a bit less nefarious though still often caustic or creates conflict with his statements. Actor's have received praise and awards for similar roles before, and playing a similar role does not inherently mean a performance is bad or just coasting, if the actor finds a new way into a similar character or shows new range within the same type of character. I will bluntly say, I don't think Culkin does either of those things in this performance. In fact, he finds less in the role. This isn't to say he's exactly doing what he did as Roman, but it is very close. From the opening scenes where we see the uptight, responsible David (Jesse Eisenberg) contrasting against his cousin, Benji, Culkin comes in with his trademark, on or off screen, chaotic energy where he very much bounces around in his delivery that is nearly always slightly sarcastic and tends to have relaxed if not slightly random posture. We get all that, and to be fair, this is fitting enough for Benji to create the sense of a man who is eccentric, does things his own way, and very much differs from his much calmer cousin. However, except for saying less cruel things, or at least seeming to not mean them in some cases, Culkin's performance feels very much like he's hitting repeated beats without surprising variation to those beats. It feels just like Benji is a nicer Roman. Maybe unfair, but at the same time Culkin could've differentiated these performances more, but he doesn't.
We get kind of two types of scenes within Benji acting out as he does, which the film assumes are all very endearing no matter what. This comes into play when we see him with the tour they’re seeing Poland through, which including Holocaust related sites, including the tour guide James (Will Sharpe), an older Jewish woman Marcia (Jennifer Grey), a man who went through the Rwandan genocide Elgoe (Kurt Egyiawan), there’s also a married couple but they matter less than the already other underwritten characters. The first type of scene is where Benji acts out seemingly to get everyone involved or out of their shell. Which Culkin brings an energy to, such as assigning roles at a WWII monument for each of the people, and everyone thinks is amazing because it is written as such. I must admit, I don’t find Culkin quite has the specific endearing energy the film assumes he has here, seems kind of annoying at times, so everyone absolutely loving him without question feels contrived and part of it is Culkin doesn’t entirely sell it to me, despite certainly bringing a chaotic energy to the proceedings however seems more forceful than inviting. The other are moments where he attacks our guide for seeming not showing enough respect, which Culkin is less smiley in these moments, but other than looking slightly annoyed I will say there’s a lack of depth. These moments, I assume, are to show Benji acting out due to his especially hard to cover up the real trauma he’s going through by thinking about what his deceased grandmother went through, but Culkin’s frustration feels very much on the surface. I’ll say part of the reason for this feels so evident to me is that I’ve seen Culkin convey this very type of action covering emotion in Succession, so much more successfully, with so much more intensity in his eyes, sense of anxiety in every moment reflecting someone putting up their emotional defenses. Culkin in his earlier work found variations even in this notion where you really felt the sense of history as he acts up, here Culkin tries but it feels like he’s acting up in order for the scene to have Benji acting up rather than a natural expression of his character’s inner turmoil.
There is emotional turmoil in this performance but it feels like moments set aside for them. We open seeing him alone at the airport clearly depressed, where his expression is well performed by Culkin and convincing as such. When he talks about his grandmother we have a mini breakdown over her loss, again natural pain shown as the emotions surface in Culkin’s face. The same is true when they take the concentration camp part of their tour and it leaves Benji sobbing. The sobbing is all again very convincing as we see the man just writhing in anguish. But, unlike in Succession where those bigger emotional moments fueled other quieter or defensive moments, these moments feel isolated within the narrative and sadly I have to say within Culkin’s own performance. Because the emotion is so limited in the eccentric acting out scenes, these feel sometimes like emotions for the sake of them. The thing is each moment isn’t any kind of check point or arc within his overall work. They are moments for that moment, they don’t fuel how he is in the next few scenes or where Benji is going from there. The film wants us to believe all of this turns Benji for the better by the end when we see him thoughtful but happy in the same spot at the airport at the end of the film. Culkin portrays that expression convincingly just as he had the other, but I never felt I saw what truly created this change in the man from possibly suicidal to finding renewed life.
It all just happens and while it speaks to the weakness of the screenplay it also speaks to limitations of Culkin’s own performance that feels like autopilot more often than not. Not a bad autopilot, he’s good at the approach in a general sense but it never is especially inspired. Take the core relationship between David and Benji, where Culkin acts up a storm being eccentric while Eisenberg stays reserved most of the time. Okay, that dynamic is clear and obvious but does it feel like we truly sense the history between them? I would say not really, just get the basic gist, even when we lead to conflict it is basic notes of frustration between them, no sense of years of conflict or breaking apart or anything that truly would elevate it to feeling like we’ve come into these two at an essential crossroads. The whole grandmother element I think is fundamental in what is missing because the character is missing, yes in conception we don’t meet her, but we should meet her through Culkin’s performance, but we don’t. When Culkin talks about her, he’s sad sure, but you don’t get shades of tenderness, of guilt, of nostalgia, to really let us fundamentally feel the loss beyond a generalized sadness. Culkin isn’t bad, but much like the film, he’s aggressively fine. There’s nothing here that feels new in Culkin’s repertoire, and to be perfectly honest it feels like a lesser variation of his far greater work in Succession. In Succession Roman felt like a real person. Here while Culkin can convey real emotions, in the end Benji feels like a screenwriter’s creation only, who we’re told is charming, yet we don’t really sense that, we told he’s troubled but mostly we just see that he’s sad. Benji was clearly a role tailor made for Culkin, but maybe too much, because it all feels very safe and feeling safe makes Benji feel a little false.
33 comments:
I admit I have a hard time judging this performance on any metric, because his looks, mannerisms, and speech patterns in this specific role reminds me of someone I know and don’t really get along with. It’s actually uncanny.
1. Pearce
2. Borisov
3. Norton
4. Strong
5. Culkin
My thoughts exactly. I think I was rather kind to him because I was trying to see the 'brilliance' so many people saw...but I kept thinking the whole time that I've seen a much better version of this exact performance before.
Thoughts and rating for Eisenberg?
1) Pearce
2) Borisov
3) Strong
4) Norton
5) Culkin
I'll reserve judgement for this performance until I see it. Side note, though: His Variety interview with Colman Domingo was quite entertaining.
Also, I just want to say in advance, Louis...I do not envy the minefield you'll be stepping into when reviewing Stan and Strong.
And this here is why it's generally NOT a good idea to write with specific actors in mind.
1. Pearce
2. Borisov
3. Norton
4. Strong
5. Culkin
Mitchell: That interview is fantastic.
1. Pearce
2. Borisov
3. Strong
4. Norton
5. Culkin
Matt: Not trying to invalidate your (seemingly) not-so-high opinion there on Culkin's work, but the role actually wasn't written with Culkin in mind. In fact, Eisenberg was considering playing Benji until Emma Stone advised him against playing a livewire character while directing.
Anonymous: Well that's very odd then.
I also actually haven't seen him yet I'm just going by what this review says.
1. Pearce
2. Borisov
3. Strong
4. Norton
5. Culkin
Generally agree on this (and the film, which hasn't stayed with me at all), but might give him a little more credit, I think one moment I particularly liked was the slap thing towards the end. Him and Eisenberg have good chemistry though I'd also agree with Robert that Eisenberg stands out more.
I'm kind of hoping there might be an upset given the film underperformed overall, but if he wins it'll be a lesser win but not an awful one, category fraud aside.
Louis: Were there still a few musical numbers in Emilia Pérez that you thought worked well like you said in your initial review and if so, wich ones? And what rating would you give to Adriana Paz now?
Hope Paz stays a 3. The film is bad but I thought she almost willed it into becoming good with her scenes.
1. Pearce
2. Borisov
3. Strong
4. Norton
5. Culkin
Now that I’ve seen all of the Supporting Actor nominees, I have to say… kinda mid? None of them are bad, but Borisov is the only one I’d consider for a ballot.
I haven't seen ANY of the nominees. I gotta catch up.
1. Pearce
2. Strong
3. Borisov
4. Norton
5. Culkin
1. Pearce
2. Borisov
3. Norton
4. Kendall
5. Roman
Awfully tempted to predict Borisov at #1 here.
Louis: Thoughts on 'Kiss The Sky' from The Wild Robot.
1. Borisov
2. Pearce
3. Norton
4. Strong
5. Culkin
@Harris
I wouldn't jump on that, Robert and Louis often disagree.
Anonymous: I mean, not always. I'm pretty sure we'll match up on the Actor lineup. Though I guess this year that might not be the case for Supporting Actor, considering two of my favorites were from Furiosa.
I have friends who have seen A Real Pain and said it is the most comfortable film of the season awards. It is not long, it is not heavy and it is not complex. According to them, it is perfect to watch after The Brutalist or hours before the Oscar ceremony starts. Even with this low rating of Louis I will follow their advice.
Shaggy: Do whatever you want, man.
Shaggy: That's fair.
Louis: Do you intend on seeing Flight Risk.
Tahmeed:
Eisenberg - 4(His performance probably resonated slightly more with me this time around, though I did always prefer his performance over Culkin’s as I feel he more successfully fills his role than Culkin does entirely his. Eisenberg is playing into his finicky wheelhouse as well but I more so believed that finickiness here and for certain moments his grounded reactions helped make sense flow a bit smoother to me in his reactions to Culkin. Additionally, as much as we see David as the put together guy, I did get the most emotion out of his speech scene, which by the way why all the characters would barely say bye to him after showing his heart in that moment doesn’t really add up. But regardless, I felt more to Benji’s struggle in Eisenberg’s portrayal of the emotional frustration of sadness but also anger combined in trying to reason with how he sees his cousin. And while Eisenberg consistently gives him less scenes to “act out” I did find myself more consistently getting a real sense of someone closer to a real person with him than with Culkin.)
Luke:
“Kiss the Sky” is better than all of the actual song nominees and actually has an impact within the film itself, with lyrics actually having something to do with the film and its overall thematic message. Has wonderful quiet build towards the wholly invigorating uptempo change with the additional instrumentation and voices to the chorus to really essentially cry the idea of getting to fly in the way it progresses so powerfully. Beautifully constructed in the balance between that and the quieter built up to make a proper inspirational song.
Well probably not anytime soon, but I’m sure I’ll probably watch it when it’s on a streaming service somewhere.
Lucas:
As noted on the previous post, I was grasping for straws in my previous review coming at the film before anyone around here had seen it and the critical consensus suggested it was divisive but largely good. So I was trying to find something to hold onto to explain it, and if you asked me then what the good numbers were, I wouldn’t have been able to come up with them. Paz is unchanged honestly she’s the best part of the film.
Shaggy:
Well I like to be like X in JFK, don’t take my word for it, do your own research, come to your own conclusions. There’s very few films I’d tell someone not to watch.
Perfectionist:
I don’t think Matt was attacking him.
Louis: Apologies to Matt, if not. Maybe a lapse in my judgement.
1. Pearce
2. Borisov
3. Norton
4. Strong
5. Culkin
POSSIBILE SPOILERS FOR THE BRUTALIST (I can delete the comment if someone is bothered about it)
Louis: your thoughts on Alwyn in The Brutalist? Is there any chance to have his performance reviewed? There are some bits of his work that I can’t take off my mind, like the ending reactions or even the way he says with that prickly smile “We tolerate you” to Laszlo. I don’t think he’s a charismatic actor in general, but here, his not so charming presence worked perfectly within the character to portray a puppet, someone who wants to emulate his father, while in reality he’s much closer to Laszlo in a way. I mean, this maybe up to interpretation, but I think his reactions when Erszebet explains what happened to Lazlo are a big hint about his trauma and the real nature of the abusive relationship with his father in my opinion , as if he wanted to repress this side and become like him (the scene with Zsofia for example). I also think the same could be said about his sister Maggie, and not by chance she never says anything. What do you think about this aspect?
Omar:
I'll admit I wasn't sure of what to make of his performance entirely the first time around and whether or not he was leaning too much into trope as the spoiled rich son. But then I too thought he was great in his last scene in expressing far more than just anger or even disbelief in his reaction in that scene. And I would agree that he managed to suggest those perhaps memories pouring out in the freak out through the sequence as clearly he not only believes it about his dad, he doesn't quite know to react to it. I look forward to seeing how I feel fully on rewatch with the context of the ending with the rest of his performance.
Post a Comment